Request for a Faster UD-Q4_K_XL Quantization of Qwen3.8-Flash-Next

#14
by NamerPRO - opened

Hi AtomicChat team!

I’m currently using your AD-4.27bpw-Q4_K_M-M64 quantization of Qwen3.8-Flash-Next on my:

  • Intel Core i9-14900HX
  • RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8 GB VRAM)
  • 64 GB DDR5 RAM

It runs at around 16 tokens/sec, which is excellent for my hardware.

I noticed that other quantization approaches, such as UD-Q4_K_XL, may potentially provide better quality at a similar size.

Would it be possible for AtomicChat to create a UD-Q4_K_XL build of Qwen3.8-Flash-Next that retains the quality advantages of UD quantization while achieving performance close to your current AD-4.27bpw-Q4_K_M-M64 (~16 tok/s)?

If this is technically possible, I’d really appreciate such a build.

Ideally, it would also be great if you could provide the same evaluation metrics you already provide for your current builds:

  • In memory
  • On SSD
  • Total size
  • Mean KLD
  • Same top-1 %
  • PPL ratio

My goal is simply to get the best possible quality while keeping the ~16 tok/s performance of your current Q4_K_M build.

Thanks for your work on these quantizations!

UD-Q4_K_XL is approaching 5-bit average and it bumps up most tensors, not just the n-gram table, which means it won't even be close to size in terms of VRAM|RAM resident + SSD resident. And with only 8GiB+64GiB setup, you'd be short in memory, heck I can barely run Unsloth's UD-IQ4_XS in my 16GiB+64GB (just around ~6GB free for some stuff to do) so it's a hopeless wish unless you add more RAM to your system.

Hi AtomicChat team!

I’m currently using your AD-4.27bpw-Q4_K_M-M64 quantization of Qwen3.8-Flash-Next on my:

  • Intel Core i9-14900HX
  • RTX 4070 Laptop GPU (8 GB VRAM)
  • 64 GB DDR5 RAM

It runs at around 16 tokens/sec, which is excellent for my hardware.

I noticed that other quantization approaches, such as UD-Q4_K_XL, may potentially provide better quality at a similar size.

Would it be possible for AtomicChat to create a UD-Q4_K_XL build of Qwen3.8-Flash-Next that retains the quality advantages of UD quantization while achieving performance close to your current AD-4.27bpw-Q4_K_M-M64 (~16 tok/s)?

If this is technically possible, I’d really appreciate such a build.

Ideally, it would also be great if you could provide the same evaluation metrics you already provide for your current builds:

  • In memory
  • On SSD
  • Total size
  • Mean KLD
  • Same top-1 %
  • PPL ratio

My goal is simply to get the best possible quality while keeping the ~16 tok/s performance of your current Q4_K_M build.

Thanks for your work on these quantizations!

how did you get 16 t/s with 8 gb vram/64 gb ram?with which llama.cpp version, context size and which flags?

Sign up or log in to comment