GSM8K: publish the FIRST Quark run (0.94/0.92, gate seed 1234) — chosen before any result existed to prefer, which removes the selection question rather than arguing about it

GSM8K: publish all four runs (3-seed promotion gate + campaign cell). Strict-match spans 0.88-0.94 across seeds, a +/-3 item spread on n=50 — wider than the gap to the reference, so the row does not support a quality claim in either direction

results table: HTML with category bands and a two-line label column, so it does not squish on mobile (5 columns instead of 6; n moved into the label)

crc32.txt: regenerate — 4 of 8 entries were stale (written before the tokenizer/chat-template were rebuilt), so the shipped manifest would have failed verification on half its files

report GSM8K as a range: two runs exist at the same seed and the card published the higher one; align AA-LCR arm B to its score.json (0.800, not the rejudge pass) so every arm uses the same judging pass

correct the tau2 telecom row: prior values were from other models (Ornith / GX10 pair), not the Qwen3.8-27B arms — real reference is 0.939, gap is 8 sims not 14

tau2: add airline (0.840 vs ref 0.760) and correct the telecom error count (1 of 114, not zero); drop the single-run quality comparison against AMD's build and state the structural difference instead

throughput: correct arms (C vs B at matched 262k, think-ON, measured on this artifact); drop think-OFF figures that belonged to the earlier MXFP4 build; note the W4A4 declaration

model card: what is quantised, serving on the RDNA4 port, measured results as of 2026-08-17, reproduction recipe

MXFP4 (AMD Quark 0.12) weights for RDNA4 — MLP/expert projections 4-bit, attention/norms/embeddings/router/vision bf16

initial commit