raw: 1. The image is completely black, indicating no discernible content or details. This suggests a severe degradation in perceptual quality, as there is no information to assess sharpness, noise, or other qualities.


raw:
1
The image is very dark and lacks clear details, making it difficult to discern any specific features or content. The overall impression is one of low visibility and poor quality.


raw:
1
The image is heavily blurred, making it difficult to discern any clear details or content. The lack of focus and clarity significantly degrades the perceptual quality.


raw: 1. The image is heavily blurred and lacks any discernible details, making it difficult to identify any specific content or features. This level of degradation significantly impacts the perceptual quality, making it the lowest possible rating on the given scale.


raw:
1
The image is heavily degraded with significant noise, compression artifacts, and blur, making it difficult to discern any clear details or content.


raw:
1
The image is heavily degraded, with significant noise and compression artifacts, making it difficult to discern any clear details or features.


raw:
1
The image is heavily blurred and lacks clear details, making it difficult to discern specific features or objects. The overall quality is very poor, indicating severe degradation.


raw:
1
The image is heavily distorted, with visible artifacts and a lack of clarity, making it difficult to discern details.


raw:
1
The image is heavily blurred, making it difficult to discern any details or content. The lack of clarity and sharpness significantly degrades the perceptual quality.


raw:
2

The image appears to have a moderate level of noise and lacks sharpness, which affects its overall quality. The details are not very clear, and there are some artifacts present, which are not ideal for a high-quality image.


raw: 2. The image is somewhat blurry and lacks detail, which is typical for low-resolution or compressed images. The lack of sharpness and detail suggests it is not of high quality.


raw:
3

The image appears to have some noise and lacks sharpness, which slightly degrades its quality. However, the details are still discernible, and there are no severe artifacts or blurring present.


raw:
1
The image is heavily blurred and lacks clear details, making it difficult to discern any specific features or content. The overall quality is very poor, indicating a severe degradation in perceptual quality.


raw:
3

The image has a moderate level of noise and some blurriness, which slightly degrades its quality. However, the details are still discernible, and the overall composition is clear.


raw:
1
The image exhibits heavy noise, compression artifacts, and a lack of sharpness, making it difficult to discern clear details or content.


raw: 2. The image appears to have a significant amount of noise and blurriness, which affects the overall clarity and detail. The edges are not sharp, and there is a lack of fine detail that would be present in a high-quality image.


raw:
1
The image is heavily degraded with visible noise, compression artifacts, and a lack of sharpness, making it difficult to discern details.


raw:
3

The image appears to have some level of noise or compression artifacts, which slightly degrade the overall quality. The details are not very sharp, and there is a lack of clarity in the edges and textures.


raw:
1
The image is heavily blurred, making it difficult to discern specific details or features. The lack of sharpness and clarity suggests a low perceptual quality.


raw:
4

The image is clear and sharp, with vibrant colors and no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details of the flower's structure are well-defined, indicating a high perceptual quality.


raw:
1
The image is heavily blurred, making it difficult to discern details, which significantly degrades its perceptual quality.


raw:
3

The image appears to have a moderate level of blur, which affects the overall sharpness and detail. The lighting and colors are somewhat muted, and there is a lack of fine detail that would be expected in a high-quality image. The subject is recognizable, but the lack of clarity detracts from the quality.


raw: 3 The image has a soft, painterly quality with a warm color palette, but the details are not very sharp and there is a slight blur, which prevents it from being rated higher.


raw:
3

The image appears to have some noise and lacks sharpness, which is why it doesn't qualify for a higher rating. However, the main subject is still recognizable, and the colors are vibrant, which is better than a severely degraded image.


raw: 3 The image has a high level of detail and clarity, but the subject matter is highly stylized and surreal, which may affect the perception of quality. The colors are vibrant and the lines are sharp, but the subject's expression and the blood splatter are intentionally exaggerated for artistic effect.


raw: 3 The image appears to have a moderate level of noise and lacks sharpness, which is typical for images that are heavily compressed or have been processed to a high degree of abstraction. The details are not very clear, and the overall quality is compromised by these factors.


raw: 4 The image is vibrant and clear, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The colors are well-defined and the details are sharp, indicating a high perceptual quality.


raw: 3 The image appears to be a digital painting with a stylized, somewhat abstract quality. The colors are vibrant, and the lines are smooth, but there is a lack of fine detail and the image does not have the crispness or clarity that would be expected in a high-quality photograph or a detailed digital artwork. The overall impression is one of a stylized, artistic rendering rather than a high-resolution photograph.


raw: 3 The image is clear and the details of the portrait are distinguishable, but there is a slight blur and the lighting is not optimal, which slightly reduces the quality.


raw:
4

The image appears to be of high quality with vibrant colors and clear details, though it may be slightly overprocessed or enhanced, which is common in astronomical images to bring out features. The stars and nebulae are well-defined, and there is a good balance of light and shadow, indicating a high-quality image.


raw: 4 The image is clear and sharp with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The character model is well-defined, and the lighting is even, contributing to a high-quality appearance.


raw: 3 The image has a soft focus and some noise, which slightly degrades the quality, but the subject is still recognizable and the lighting is well-balanced.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean and sharp details, but there is a slight yellow tint that might be considered a minor imperfection.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean lines and vibrant colors, but there is a slight blur around the edges which slightly reduces the score.


raw: 4 The image is clear and sharp with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details in the character's face and hair are well-defined, indicating a high-quality image.


raw: 2. The image is blurry and lacks sharpness, which affects the overall quality. The details are not clear, and the image appears to be out of focus.


raw: 4 The image is clear and sharp, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details of the mirror frame and the reflection are well-defined.


raw:
3

The image has a moderate level of blur and lacks sharpness, which affects the overall quality. The lighting and color are somewhat muted, and there is a lack of fine detail that would be expected in a high-quality image.


raw: 3 The image appears to be a painting with a soft, somewhat blurry quality, which is typical for artistic renderings. The details are not sharp, and there is a lack of fine detail that would be expected in a high-quality photograph. However, the colors and composition are well-defined, indicating a good perceptual quality for a painting.


raw:
3

The image appears to have a soft, painterly quality with a lack of sharpness and detail, which is characteristic of a certain artistic style or filter rather than a degradation in quality. The colors are vibrant, and the subject is recognizable, but the overall impression is more artistic than photographic.


raw: 3 The image is clear and the details are distinguishable, but there is a slight blur and the lighting is not optimal, which slightly reduces the quality.


raw: 3 The image appears to be of moderate quality, with some noise and compression artifacts present, but the details are still discernible.


raw:
4

The image is visually striking and the details are clear, with a high level of sharpness and a clean composition. The lighting and colors are well-balanced, and there are no visible artifacts or noise that would detract from the overall quality.


raw: 4 The image is clear and well-lit, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The subject is in focus, and the details are sharp, indicating a high-quality image.


raw: 4 The image is clear and the colors are vibrant, but there is a slight lack of sharpness and detail that prevents it from being a perfect 5.


raw: 4 The image is clear and well-lit, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details of the person's clothing and the texture of the goose are sharp, indicating a high-quality image.


raw:
3

The image appears to have a moderate level of detail and clarity, but there are some artifacts and distortions, particularly around the edges of the subject and the background, which slightly degrade the overall quality.


raw: 3 The image has a high level of detail and color, but the lines are not perfectly sharp, and there is a slight lack of clarity in the edges, which prevents it from being rated as a high-quality image.


raw: 4 The image is clear and well-composed, with good detail and color, but there is a slight graininess that suggests it might be a digital reproduction of a painting rather than a high-resolution photograph.


raw:
4

The image is vibrant and detailed, with a high level of visual complexity and a clear, sharp focus on the subject matter. The colors are rich and the lines are well-defined, indicating a high-quality digital illustration. However, the image is not completely artifact-free, as there are some minor imperfections that slightly detract from the overall quality.


raw:
4

The image appears to be of high quality with clean lines and sharp details, though there is a slight lack of depth and texture that might be due to the digital nature of the character model. The lighting is well-balanced, and the character's features are rendered with good clarity.


raw: 4 The image is visually appealing with a clear and vibrant depiction of a dragon, but it lacks the fine detail and sharpness that would be expected in a high-quality image. The colors are rich and the contrast is strong, but there is a slight softness to the edges that prevents it from being a perfect 5.


raw: 4 The image is clear and sharp, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The lighting and contrast are well-balanced, and the subject is in focus.


raw: 4 The image is clear and well-lit, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details of the equipment and the individuals are sharp, indicating a high-quality image.


raw: 4 The image is clean and sharp with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details in the rock and the water are well-defined, and the lighting is even, contributing to a high-quality appearance.


raw: 4 The image is clear and sharp, with good detail and a clean background, indicating a high quality photograph.


raw: 3 The image has a soft, painterly quality with a focus on the subject's face, but the background is somewhat blurry and lacks detail, which slightly reduces the overall quality.


raw:
4

The image appears to have a high level of detail and clarity, with smooth gradients and a lack of visible noise or compression artifacts. The lighting and color are well-balanced, contributing to a high-quality visual presentation.


raw: 3 The image has a moderate level of noise and lacks sharpness, which slightly degrades its quality. However, the details are still discernible, and the lighting is balanced, making it a decent quality image.


raw:
4

The image is vibrant and detailed, with a high level of clarity and a wide range of colors. The spiral structure is well-defined, and the stars are numerous and distinct, indicating a high-quality image. However, the image is not perfect, as there are some minor artifacts and the colors are somewhat saturated, which slightly reduces the score to 4.


raw: 3 The image has a clear subject and a well-defined environment, but the lighting and reflections create some visual noise and artifacts, which slightly degrade the overall quality.


raw: 3 The image appears to have some noise and lacks sharpness, which is why it doesn't qualify for a higher rating.


raw:
4

The image is of high quality with clean lines, sharp details, and vibrant colors. The character and background are well-defined, and there are no visible artifacts or noise. The lighting is even, and the overall composition is pleasing to the eye.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean and sharp details, minimal noise, and no visible compression artifacts or blurring.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean lines and sharp details, but there is a slight lack of depth and the lighting could be more natural.


raw: 4 The image is clear and well-lit, with good detail in the subject and background. There are no noticeable artifacts or compression issues.


raw: 4 The image is vibrant and clear, with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details in the trees and flowers are sharp, and the colors are well-saturated, indicating a high-quality image.


raw: 4 The image is visually striking and has a high level of detail, with a clear and sharp focus on the tunnel's interior. The lighting and color gradients are well-executed, contributing to a high-quality appearance. However, there is a slight presence of noise, which slightly detracts from the perfect score.


raw:
4

The image is of high quality with clean lines, sharp details, and vibrant colors. The lighting is well-balanced, and there are no visible artifacts or compression issues. The subject and background are distinct, and the overall composition is pleasing to the eye.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean lines and sharp details, but there is a slight softness in the background which might be due to the artistic style rather than degradation.


raw: 4 The image is clean and sharp with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details of the flowers are well-defined, and the colors are vibrant, indicating a high-quality image.


raw:
4

The image has a high level of detail and clarity, with smooth gradients and a lack of noise or compression artifacts. The lighting and shading are well-executed, contributing to a high-quality appearance.


raw: 3 The image is clear and the details of the Eiffel Tower are well-defined, but the red splatter effect and the lack of a background context slightly reduce the overall quality.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean and sharp details, but the background is slightly blurred which is a common technique to emphasize the subject. The colors are vibrant and the subject is well-defined.


raw:
4

The image is of high quality with clean lines and sharp details, but there is a slight softness in the lighting and shading that prevents it from being a perfect 5.


raw: 4 The image is clean and sharp with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details are well-defined, and the colors are vibrant, indicating a high-quality image.


raw: 4 The image is clear and well-lit, with good detail and color accuracy. However, there is a slight softness to the image that prevents it from being a perfect 5.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean lines, sharp details, and no visible noise or compression artifacts. The lighting and shading are well-executed, contributing to a visually appealing and realistic appearance.


raw:
4

The image is of high quality with clear details, vibrant colors, and no visible noise or compression artifacts. The underwater scene is well-lit and the textures of the rocks and plants are sharp.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean lines and vibrant colors, but there is a slight lack of sharpness in the fur texture, which prevents it from being a perfect 5.


raw:
4

The image is vibrant and clear, with a high level of detail and a smooth color gradient. The lines are sharp, and there are no visible artifacts or noise, indicating a high perceptual quality.


raw: 4 The image is clean and sharp with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details of the donut and its toppings are well-defined, and the lighting is even, contributing to the high quality of the image.


raw: 4 The image is clear and sharp, with good lighting and color balance. There are no visible noise, compression artifacts, or blur. The subject is in focus, and the details are well-defined.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean and sharp details, vibrant colors, and no visible noise or compression artifacts. The focus is excellent, and the subject is well-composed.


raw: 4 The image is clear and sharp, with good lighting and detail in the garden and building. There are no visible noise or compression artifacts.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean lines and sharp details, but there is a slight lack of depth and contrast that prevents it from being a perfect 5.


raw:
4

The image appears to be of high quality with clean and sharp details, although there is a slight vignette effect which slightly reduces the overall quality. The lighting is well-balanced, and the subject is in focus.


raw: 4 The image is clear and sharp, with good color saturation and contrast. The details of the train and the surrounding environment are well-defined, and there are no visible compression artifacts or noise.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean, sharp details and no visible noise or compression artifacts. The lion's fur and facial features are well-defined, and the lighting enhances the texture and depth of the image.


raw: 4 The image is clean and sharp with no visible noise or compression artifacts. The details in the room and the reflections in the windows are clear, indicating a high quality image.


raw: 3 The image is clear and the details are distinguishable, but there is a slight lack of sharpness and the background appears a bit blurry, which slightly reduces the overall quality.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean and sharp details, vibrant colors, and no visible noise or compression artifacts. The focus is on the cat's face, and the background is softly blurred, which enhances the subject.


raw: 4 The image is high quality with clean lines and sharp details, but there is a slight vignette effect which slightly reduces the overall quality.


raw: 3 The image is clear and the subject is well-defined, but there is a slight graininess and the contrast is not very high, which slightly reduces the overall quality.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean and sharp details, but there is a slight softness in the lighting which might be considered a minor flaw.


raw:
4

The image has a high level of detail and vibrant colors, but there is a slight blur and some noise, which prevents it from being a perfect 5. The composition is visually appealing, but the lack of sharpness and some noise detract from its quality.


raw: 4 The image is visually appealing with vibrant colors and a clear focus on the butterflies. The background is slightly blurred, which helps to emphasize the butterflies, and the lighting is soft and natural, contributing to the overall high-quality appearance. However, there are some minor artifacts and slight noise, which prevent it from being a perfect 5.


raw: 4 The image is high quality with clean lines and sharp details, but the black and white format and the subject's expression add a certain artistic quality that might be seen as slightly less than perfect for a strictly high-quality rating.


raw: 4 The image is of high quality with clean and sharp details, minimal noise, and no visible compression artifacts or blurring. The subject is well-composed and the lighting is even, enhancing the overall perception of quality.