--- license: apache-2.0 base_model: EvanOLeary/laguna-xs2-dense-k8-cuda-sft pipeline_tag: text-generation library_name: transformers tags: [moe-to-dense, densification, laguna, cuda, kernels, sft, code] language: [en] --- # Laguna-XS.2 → Dense (K=8) · **CUDA-SFT-extended** (follow-up SFT) A **~3.0 B dense** CUDA-kernel model — a **follow-up SFT** on top of [laguna-xs2-dense-k8-cuda-sft](https://huggingface.co/EvanOLeary/laguna-xs2-dense-k8-cuda-sft), trained on **more CUDA / C++ kernel code**. ## Lineage ``` poolside/Laguna-XS.2 (33B/3B-active MoE, 256 experts) → densify (K=8 dense SwiGLU) → DO-ACP warm-start → reconstruction-pretrain (kernel mixture, "V2") → SFT (SakanaAI CUDA, level_1+2, 400 steps) = laguna-xs2-dense-k8-cuda-sft → SFT-extended (level_1+2+3, +500 steps) = THIS MODEL → RFT/GRPO (verifiable reward) = next (laguna-xs2-dense-k8-cuda-rft) ``` ## Why a follow-up SFT (rationale) The first SFT (400 steps, level_1+2) produced a model that emits working CUDA on **simple ops** (ReLU/Tanh ~3/4 at pass@k) but showed two gaps: - **Thin C++ idiom coverage** — it botches more involved C++/CUDA constructs (e.g. `float4* v = float4* ptr;` instead of `reinterpret_cast(ptr)`), so vectorized kernels fail to compile. - **Limited CUDA breadth** — harder ops (Sigmoid/GeLU/Softmax) compile/verify inconsistently. This follow-up **extends the SFT** with **more CUDA + C++ kernel data** (Sakana `level_1+2+3`, +500 steps from the previous checkpoint) to broaden C++/CUDA coverage before RL. It is the **mid checkpoint** in a 3-way comparison: `SFT` → `SFT-extended` (this) → `SFT-extended-RFT`. ## Training | | | |---|---| | Base | `laguna-xs2-dense-k8-cuda-sft` (continued, not from scratch) | | Data | `SakanaAI/AI-CUDA-Engineer-Archive` `level_1,level_2,level_3` (correct kernels), PyTorch→CUDA, chat-formatted, prompt masked | | Objective | causal-LM cross-entropy on the CUDA completion only | | Trainable | `routed_dense` + `lm_head` + norms (1.19 B) | | Optimizer | AdamW 1e-5, grad-clip 1.0, grad-accum 8, seq 2048, **500 steps** | ## Evaluation Benchmarked 3-way (SFT / SFT-extended / SFT-extended-RFT) on **KernelBench-Lite L1** (10 elementwise ops, **K=4**, subprocess-isolated compile+correctness vs PyTorch eager). Results table: [github.com/Tyronita/laguna-dense-cuda-kernels](https://github.com/Tyronita/laguna-dense-cuda-kernels). ## Intended use Research base for **RFT** (RL on verified compile+correctness+speedup). Kernels are not verified at generation time — compile & check before use, and isolate execution (a bad kernel corrupts the CUDA context).