Download README.md from SlayerLab/gollem-v5-ckpts: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 5.11 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/SlayerLab/gollem-v5-ckpts/resolve/768f42f0101810a0d6b5302a0f9e1eec343fac3d/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://SlayerLab/gollem-v5-ckpts@768f42f0101810a0d6b5302a0f9e1eec343fac3d/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/SlayerLab/gollem-v5-ckpts/resolve/768f42f0101810a0d6b5302a0f9e1eec343fac3d/README.md
license: apache-2.0
language:
- en
library_name: pytorch
pipeline_tag: text-generation
tags:
- tiny-lm
- gpt
- nanogpt
- glint-tiny-ml-leaderboard
- english
datasets:
- SlayerLab/minimal-en-corpus-5b
GoLLeM-v5 — Tiny English Language Models (16M-32M)
Research checkpoints of sub-100M-parameter English language models, GPT-style decoders (nanoGPT lineage) trained for the Glint Tiny-ML Leaderboard. This repository is a controlled single-factor scaling study: identical architecture/hyper-parameters/seed, varying only tokens and model width.
Model details
- Architecture: decoder-only Transformer (nanoGPT lineage), learned positional embeddings, tied input/output embeddings.
- Sizes: 16M variant = 6 layers / d_model 408 / 6 heads (17.4M params); 32M variant = 6 layers / d_model 576 / 9 heads (31.4M params).
- Context length: 1024 tokens.
- Tokenizer: BPE, vocab 12288 (
tokenizer.json), shared across all checkpoints. - Training: AdamW, lr 6e-4 -> 6e-5 (cosine), batch 64 x 1024 (65,536 tok/step), seed 1337, bf16 (RTX 5090).
Checkpoints
| checkpoint | params | shape | tokens | BLiMP | ARC-Easy | WikiText-2 BPB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
bpe16m_3.2B/ckpt.pt |
17.4M | L6 d408 h6 | 3.2B | 67.40 | 38.22 | 1.2161 |
bpe16m_6B/ckpt.pt |
17.4M | L6 d408 h6 | 6B | 68.92 | 39.10 | 1.1943 |
bpe16m_10B/ckpt.pt |
17.4M | L6 d408 h6 | 10B | 70.36 | 39.52 | 1.1815 |
bpe32m_baseline/ckpt.pt |
31.4M | L6 d576 h9 | 10B | 70.08 | 42.59 | 1.124 |
Usage
These are raw nanoGPT-lineage checkpoints (plain torch state dicts), not transformers AutoModel
weights. The model class and a ready board-scoring harness are included in this repo:
train_gpt_ref.py— GPT definition (rebuild the GPT of the tabled shape,load_state_dict, trim logits to vocab 12288).glint_parity_eval.py— the exact Glint board-scoring forward (256-token clip, raw log-prob) for BLiMP / ARC-Easy / WikiText-2.
import torch
from tokenizers import Tokenizer
tok = Tokenizer.from_file("tokenizer.json") # BPE-12k, vocab 12288
ckpt = torch.load("bpe16m_10B/ckpt.pt", map_location="cpu")
state = ckpt.get("model", ckpt) # load into the GPT from train_gpt_ref.py
Training data
SlayerLab/minimal-en-corpus-5b
— ~5.40B BPE-12k tokens, English, decontaminated against the benchmark test sets. A broad high-quality mix:
FineWeb-Edu, DCLM, StackExchange, open-web-math, FineMath, scientific papers, books/Gutenberg, code, CC-News.
A decontaminated expansion to ~8.3B tokens (added FineWeb-Edu + OpenStax science) feeds later runs.
Evaluation
All metrics use the Glint benchmark protocol (Glint-1.3/benchmark.py), i.e. the board-comparable definitions:
- BLiMP — 67 configs (train split), each sentence clipped to the first 256 tokens, raw sentence log-prob preference (
good > bad), no length normalization. - ARC-Easy — test split, zero-shot, raw accuracy over
LL(question + choice) - LL(question). - WikiText-2 — byte-normalized bits-per-byte (the board's
wikifield is byte-scale; token-perplexity is tokenizer-dependent and not directly comparable across models).
A generic lm-eval-harness run scores BLiMP/ARC roughly 2-3pp higher than this protocol; the numbers here are the board-comparable ones.
Positioning (honest): leaderboard ranks are reconstruction estimates — we reverse-engineered the board scoring formula and validated it (it reproduces a published reference model's public rank exactly), then applied it to our Glint-protocol metrics. Under that reconstruction the 16M@10B checkpoint sits around #18/74 and the 32M baseline around #20/74. These are credible estimates, not confirmed entries; an official submission is required to confirm.
Key findings (single-factor study)
- Tokens drive BLiMP, not size. BLiMP keeps climbing with tokens (~+1.8pp per doubling, 3.2B->10B) without plateauing on the board protocol; 16M->32M at matched 10B tokens left BLiMP flat.
- Capacity + knowledge drive ARC. 16M->32M at matched tokens lifted ARC-Easy +3.07pp.
- Efficiency is size-bonus-weighted, so the smallest model reaching a given raw score ranks highest; ARC is the binding lever toward the top, targeted next via knowledge distillation.
Roadmap
- Crown run: 16M @ expanded ~8.3B-token corpus (BLiMP lift from more/better data).
- ARC boost: knowledge distillation from a strong in-house teacher (decontaminated), plus science-dense data.
- Larger raw-score variant under evaluation.
Limitations
Base (not instruction-tuned) research models at 16-32M parameters, English-only. Expect limited factual knowledge and coherence; not intended for production use.
Provenance
Full dialectical record, evaluation artifacts and eval-protocol details in labvault
21_09_GoLLeM-v5-Skalowanie-Glint/ (see 90-Ewaluacja/EvalHarnessParity.md). Trained on RunPod RTX 5090.