Automatic Speech Recognition
PEFT
Safetensors
Tibetan
tibetan
low-resource
whisper
lora
8bit
Eval Results (legacy)
Instructions to use billingsmoore/tibetan-asr-nict-tib1-whisper-tiny-lora-8bit with libraries, inference providers, notebooks, and local apps. Follow these links to get started.
- Libraries
- PEFT
How to use billingsmoore/tibetan-asr-nict-tib1-whisper-tiny-lora-8bit with PEFT:
Task type is invalid.
- Notebooks
- Google Colab
- Kaggle
Add model card with paper results and citation
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,37 +1,127 @@
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2 |
base_model: openai/whisper-tiny
|
| 3 |
datasets:
|
| 4 |
- billingsmoore/tibetan-asr
|
| 5 |
-
|
| 6 |
-
-
|
| 7 |
-
|
| 8 |
-
|
| 9 |
-
- asr
|
| 10 |
-
|
| 11 |
-
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 12 |
---
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-
#
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-
Fine-tuned
|
| 17 |
-
one of five architectures (Whisper Tiny/Base/Small, Wav2Vec2, HuBERT) and six adaptation strategies
|
| 18 |
-
(standard fine-tuning, 8-bit/4-bit quantization, LoRA, and 8-bit/4-bit QLoRA) benchmarked in:
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> J. Moore, S. Li and P. Lauren, "Evaluating Tibetan ASR With Segmented Word Error Rate: Beyond Character-Level Metrics," in *IEEE Access*, vol. 14, pp. 101790-101805, 2026, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3709206.
|
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-
- **Base model:** `openai/whisper-tiny`
|
| 27 |
-
- **Dataset:** `billingsmoore/tibetan-asr`
|
| 28 |
-
- **Language:** Tibetan (`bo`)
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
## Citation
|
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-
If you use this model, please cite:
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
```bibtex
|
| 37 |
@ARTICLE{moore2026tibetanasr,
|
|
@@ -43,4 +133,17 @@ If you use this model, please cite:
|
|
| 43 |
pages={101790-101805},
|
| 44 |
doi={10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3709206}
|
| 45 |
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 46 |
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
---
|
| 2 |
+
language: bo
|
| 3 |
+
license: apache-2.0
|
| 4 |
+
library_name: peft
|
| 5 |
+
tags:
|
| 6 |
+
- automatic-speech-recognition
|
| 7 |
+
- tibetan
|
| 8 |
+
- low-resource
|
| 9 |
+
- whisper
|
| 10 |
+
- lora
|
| 11 |
+
- peft
|
| 12 |
+
- 8bit
|
| 13 |
base_model: openai/whisper-tiny
|
| 14 |
datasets:
|
| 15 |
- billingsmoore/tibetan-asr
|
| 16 |
+
metrics:
|
| 17 |
+
- cer
|
| 18 |
+
- wer
|
| 19 |
+
model-index:
|
| 20 |
+
- name: tibetan-asr-whisper-tiny-lora-8bit
|
| 21 |
+
results:
|
| 22 |
+
- task:
|
| 23 |
+
type: automatic-speech-recognition
|
| 24 |
+
name: Automatic Speech Recognition
|
| 25 |
+
dataset:
|
| 26 |
+
type: billingsmoore/tibetan-asr
|
| 27 |
+
name: NICT-Tib1 (Lhasa Tibetan)
|
| 28 |
+
split: test
|
| 29 |
+
metrics:
|
| 30 |
+
- type: cer
|
| 31 |
+
value: 0.7555
|
| 32 |
+
name: CER
|
| 33 |
+
- type: wer
|
| 34 |
+
value: 1.0461
|
| 35 |
+
name: BoTok-SWER (Segmented WER)
|
| 36 |
---
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
+
# Whisper Tiny — Tibetan ASR (QLoRA, 8-bit)
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
+
Fine-tuned **`openai/whisper-tiny`** for automatic speech recognition (ASR) on **Lhasa Tibetan**, released alongside:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
> J. Moore, S. Li and P. Lauren, "Evaluating Tibetan ASR With Segmented Word Error Rate: Beyond Character-Level Metrics," in *IEEE Access*, vol. 14, pp. 101790-101805, 2026, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3709206.
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 |
+
This repo is one of 14 model checkpoints released with the paper, benchmarking 5 ASR architectures (Whisper Tiny/Base/Small, Wav2Vec 2.0 Base, HuBERT Base) under full fine-tuning, LoRA, and QLoRA (8-bit/4-bit) adaptation. See [billingsmoore/tibetan-asr-*](https://huggingface.co/billingsmoore) for the full set.
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
## Model description
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
Whisper is an encoder–decoder transformer, originally pre-trained by OpenAI on 680,000 hours of weakly-labeled multilingual speech-text data, fine-tuned here for sequence-to-sequence Tibetan transcription. This checkpoint uses **QLoRA fine-tuning (LoRA adapters trained on top of an 8-bit quantized base model)**.
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
**LoRA configuration:** r=8, alpha=16, dropout=0.1, targeting the attention projections (`k_proj`, `q_proj`, `v_proj`, `out_proj`) and both feed-forward layers (`fc1`, `fc2`) of every Whisper transformer block.
|
| 51 |
+
|
| 52 |
+
Base model weights are loaded in 8-bit precision (symmetric rounding, double quantization) via `bitsandbytes` before LoRA adapters are applied.
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
## Training data
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
Fine-tuned on [NICT-Tib1](https://huggingface.co/datasets/billingsmoore/tibetan-asr), a corpus of transcribed Lhasa Tibetan speech from 20 speakers (Soky, Gong & Li, 2022). The data was split by speaker (85/15, not by utterance) so that no speaker appears in both splits: 15,099 training utterances from 17 speakers, 1,547 test utterances from the remaining 3 speakers.
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
## Training procedure
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
- Base model: `openai/whisper-tiny`
|
| 61 |
+
- Learning rate: 3.75e-5
|
| 62 |
+
- Max steps: 4000 (warmup 500)
|
| 63 |
+
- Effective batch size: 16 (per-device batch size 2, gradient accumulation 8)
|
| 64 |
+
- Mixed precision: fp16, with gradient checkpointing
|
| 65 |
+
- Generation max length: 225
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+
## Evaluation results
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
Evaluated on the 1,547-utterance NICT-Tib1 test set under five metrics: Character Error Rate (CER), Syllable Error Rate (SER), and three Segmented Word Error Rate (SWER) variants using different automatic word segmenters (BoTok-SWER, BERT-SWER, and Gem-SWER, the last computed on a 500-utterance subset for API cost reasons). All values are micro-averaged. See the paper for full bootstrap confidence intervals.
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
| Metric | Value |
|
| 72 |
+
|---|---|
|
| 73 |
+
| CER (micro) | 0.7555 |
|
| 74 |
+
| SER (micro) | 0.9908 |
|
| 75 |
+
| BoTok-SWER (micro) | 1.0461 |
|
| 76 |
+
| BERT-SWER (micro, full 1,547-utt. test set) | 0.558 |
|
| 77 |
+
| Gem-SWER (micro, 500-utt. subset) | 1.2158 |
|
| 78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 79 |
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
### Full model family comparison (standard fine-tuning)
|
| 82 |
+
|
| 83 |
+
| Model | Repo | CER | SER | BoTok-SWER | BERT-SWER | Gem-SWER |
|
| 84 |
+
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 85 |
+
| HuBERT Base | [tibetan-asr-hubert-base](https://huggingface.co/billingsmoore/tibetan-asr-hubert-base) | 0.1352 | 0.3690 | 0.4477 | 0.161 | 0.9653 |
|
| 86 |
+
| Wav2Vec 2.0 Base | [tibetan-asr-wav2vec2-base](https://huggingface.co/billingsmoore/tibetan-asr-wav2vec2-base) | 0.0745 | 0.2152 | 0.2747 | 0.097 | 0.7447 |
|
| 87 |
+
| Whisper Tiny | [tibetan-asr-whisper-tiny](https://huggingface.co/billingsmoore/tibetan-asr-whisper-tiny) | 0.1560 | 0.2351 | 0.2975 | 0.118 | 0.6759 |
|
| 88 |
+
| Whisper Base | [tibetan-asr-whisper-base](https://huggingface.co/billingsmoore/tibetan-asr-whisper-base) | 0.1417 | 0.2083 | 0.2600 | 0.105 | 0.6314 |
|
| 89 |
+
| **Whisper Small** | [tibetan-asr-whisper-small](https://huggingface.co/billingsmoore/tibetan-asr-whisper-small) | **0.1185** | **0.1692** | **0.2042** | **0.086** | **0.5337** |
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
|
| 92 |
+
> [!WARNING]
|
| 93 |
+
> **This is a LoRA/QLoRA fine-tuned checkpoint. In the paper's benchmark, all LoRA and QLoRA configurations showed catastrophic word-level degradation** relative to full fine-tuning of the same base model, despite retaining partial character-level accuracy. This repo is published for reproducibility of that (negative) result, not as a recommended deployment artifact. If you need a usable Tibetan ASR model, use the [standard fine-tuned checkpoint](https://huggingface.co/billingsmoore/tibetan-asr-whisper-tiny) instead.
|
| 94 |
+
|
| 95 |
+
## How to use
|
| 96 |
+
|
| 97 |
+
```python
|
| 98 |
+
from transformers import WhisperForConditionalGeneration, WhisperProcessor
|
| 99 |
+
from transformers import BitsAndBytesConfig
|
| 100 |
+
from peft import PeftModel
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
bnb_config = BitsAndBytesConfig(load_in_8bit=True, llm_int8_skip_modules=None)
|
| 103 |
+
base_model = WhisperForConditionalGeneration.from_pretrained(
|
| 104 |
+
"openai/whisper-tiny", quantization_config=bnb_config, device_map="auto"
|
| 105 |
+
)
|
| 106 |
+
model = PeftModel.from_pretrained(base_model, "billingsmoore/tibetan-asr-whisper-tiny-lora-8bit")
|
| 107 |
+
processor = WhisperProcessor.from_pretrained("openai/whisper-tiny", language="bo", task="transcribe")
|
| 108 |
+
|
| 109 |
+
# generate as usual, e.g.:
|
| 110 |
+
# inputs = processor(audio, sampling_rate=16000, return_tensors="pt")
|
| 111 |
+
# predicted_ids = model.generate(**inputs)
|
| 112 |
+
# transcription = processor.batch_decode(predicted_ids, skip_special_tokens=True)
|
| 113 |
+
```
|
| 114 |
+
|
| 115 |
+
## Limitations
|
| 116 |
+
|
| 117 |
+
- Trained and evaluated only on read-speech, modern **Lhasa (Central) Tibetan** news recordings; performance on Amdo or Kham dialects, Classical Tibetan, or spontaneous/conversational speech is unknown.
|
| 118 |
+
- The test set contains only 3 speakers (by design, to prevent speaker leakage), which limits how confidently results generalize across speaker, age, and prosodic variation.
|
| 119 |
+
- CER alone understates errors that matter at the word level for Tibetan; see the paper for why SER and SWER are necessary complements when judging output quality.
|
| 120 |
+
- LoRA/QLoRA adapters showed severe sequence-level collapse in this study (SWER often exceeding 1.0, i.e. worse than a random-length hypothesis) despite retaining moderate CER — treat this checkpoint as a research artifact documenting that failure mode, not as a usable transcription model.
|
| 121 |
|
| 122 |
## Citation
|
| 123 |
|
| 124 |
+
If you use this model, please cite the paper and the source NICT-Tib1 corpus:
|
| 125 |
|
| 126 |
```bibtex
|
| 127 |
@ARTICLE{moore2026tibetanasr,
|
|
|
|
| 133 |
pages={101790-101805},
|
| 134 |
doi={10.1109/ACCESS.2026.3709206}
|
| 135 |
}
|
| 136 |
+
|
| 137 |
+
@inproceedings{soky2022nict,
|
| 138 |
+
title={Nict-tib1: A public speech corpus of lhasa dialect for benchmarking tibetan language speech recognition systems},
|
| 139 |
+
author={Soky, Kak and Gong, Zhuo and Li, Sheng},
|
| 140 |
+
booktitle={2022 25th Conference of the Oriental COCOSDA International Committee for the Co-ordination and Standardisation of Speech Databases and Assessment Techniques (O-COCOSDA)},
|
| 141 |
+
pages={1--5},
|
| 142 |
+
year={2022},
|
| 143 |
+
organization={IEEE}
|
| 144 |
+
}
|
| 145 |
```
|
| 146 |
+
|
| 147 |
+
## License
|
| 148 |
+
|
| 149 |
+
Released under Apache License 2.0, inherited from the base model `openai/whisper-tiny`.
|