--- tags: - blackhole - p150 - tt-dit-server - tt-model-cache - tt-model-container - tenstorrent - ttnn - tt-metal - tt-nn - keypoint-detection - superpoint - tt-model-catalog pipeline_tag: keypoint-detection license_link: https://huggingface.co/magic-leap-community/superpoint license: other license_name: magic-leap-superpoint base_model: - magic-leap-community/superpoint --- # superpoint-p150 SuperPoint (Magic Leap's self-supervised interest-point detector and descriptor) running entirely on one Tenstorrent Blackhole p150a via tt-nn: image in, keypoints with scores and 256-d descriptors out. Weights: [magic-leap-community/superpoint](https://huggingface.co/magic-leap-community/superpoint) · Paper: [arXiv:1712.07629](https://arxiv.org/abs/1712.07629) · Upstream code: [magicleap/SuperPointPretrainedNetwork](https://github.com/magicleap/SuperPointPretrainedNetwork) · Port: [changh95/tt-superpoint](https://github.com/changh95/tt-superpoint) Runs on **p150** (mesh `P150`). Packaged and published with [tt-model-manager](https://github.com/tenstorrent/tt-model-manager) 0.1.0 (manifest schema 5.1). ## Quickstart ```bash tt-model pull changh95/superpoint-p150 --with-weights tt-model serve changh95/superpoint-p150 ``` - Weights [`magic-leap-community/superpoint`](https://huggingface.co/magic-leap-community/superpoint) at `734450e9ffe2` go to your HF cache; the image does not contain them. - Serves on port 20000 (or the next free port); ready when the log says `Application startup complete`. ### Run with tt-cli ```bash tt serve changh95/superpoint-p150 printf '{"image":"%s"}' "$(base64 -w0 code/sample_data/house_in_field_1080p.jpg)" > req.json curl -s localhost:20000/predict -H 'Content-Type: application/json' -d @req.json tt model stop changh95/superpoint-p150 ``` - `POST /predict`: `image` (base64 PNG/JPEG); optional `max_keypoints` (1024, `-1` = all above threshold), `keypoint_threshold` (0.005), `nms_radius` (4), `return_descriptors` (true). - `GET /health`, `GET /info`. ### Response ```json {"num_keypoints": 539, "keypoints": [[610.0, 703.125], [1042.5, 446.25], [1122.5, 442.5]], "scores": [0.609375, 0.589844, 0.582031], "original_size": {"height": 900, "width": 1600}, "image_size": {"height": 480, "width": 640}, "scale": {"x": 2.5, "y": 1.875}, "descriptors": {"format": "npz", "key": "descriptors", "dtype": "float16", "shape": [539, 256], "data": "..."}, "serving_path": {"traced": true, "device_nms": true}, "timing_ms": {"preprocess": 17.7, "device_forward": 5.3, "postprocess": 1.3, "total": 24.3}} ``` - `keypoints` are `[x, y]` in original image pixels, sorted by descending `scores`; the network frame is 480×640 and `scale` = original / network. - `descriptors.data` is a base64 NPZ: `np.load(io.BytesIO(base64.b64decode(data)))["descriptors"]` gives `(N, 256)` float16 rows, L2-normalised, in keypoint order. ### Demo | Top-500 keypoints on the 480×640 network frame of `code/sample_data/house_in_field_1080p.jpg` (`media/sample.png`, natural image) | |:---:| | ![](media/sample.png) | ### Accuracy and speed | Metric | Value | |---|---:| | Pre-NMS score map · descriptor map PCC vs fp32 torch reference | 0.9971 · 0.9991 | | Keypoint set vs reference (natural image, top-500, 2 px) | recall 98.20% · precision 99.40% · F1 98.80% | | Inference, served over HTTP (warm, batch 1, 480×640, 1600×900 JPEG in; median of 50 requests) | 5.3 ms device (trace + device NMS) · 1.3 ms host post-processing · 18 ms JPEG decode/resize · 24.7 ms end-to-end (~40 FPS) | | Same, legacy path (`TT_FUSED=0`: untraced, host NMS) | 12.4 ms device · 26.5 ms host NMS · 56.8 ms end-to-end (~18 FPS) | | Same forward on an RTX 5090 (same host, port's torch reference, eager PyTorch, batch 1, incl. H2D/D2H; bf16 / fp16 autocast) | 1.6 / 1.5 ms → GPU 3.2–3.4× faster than the p150a's 5.1 ms device forward (incl. device NMS); fp32-strict 2.9 ms (1.7×); best `torch.compile` 1.2 ms. End-to-end both sides are bound by the ~18 ms JPEG decode/resize (GPU 21.5 vs p150a 23.9 ms) | ### Caveats - Every image is resized to 480×640 (bilinear, /255, channel 0); one image per request, batch 1, requests serialised on the chip. - This server runs the whole device graph as one metal trace per request with a standard-op device NMS (radius 4; bit-identical to the host single-pass NMS) and an `rms_norm` descriptor L2-norm (bf16-rounding-level vs the legacy chain; PCC 0.9991 either way). bf16 + HiFi2 + fp32 accumulate throughout (bfloat8/LoFi drop score PCC to ~0.91). No custom kernel: the port README's `sp_eq_mul_mask` path is not built into this image. - `nms_radius` other than 4 falls back to the host NMS on the traced scores (same keypoints, ~25 ms slower); `TT_FUSED=0` in the environment restores the untraced legacy path (validated 2026-09-12). - Weights are research-only: the Magic Leap SuperPoint licence allows academic or non-profit organisation NONCOMMERCIAL research use. - Not an OpenAI-compatible API; `GET /v1/models` is a stub so the tt-model ready card does not 404. - Validated on tt-metal `v0.78.0-dev20260820` (main `8b98410e730`), single p150a only; numbers above measured 2026-09-13 through this container image (`DEVICE_VALIDATION.md`). - GPU comparison: GPU bf16/fp16 3.2–3.4× faster on the device forward, but the served request is host-bound on both sides (JPEG decode/resize ~18 ms), so end-to-end the GPU is only 1.1× faster. RTX 5090 rows (2026-09-14): same host, the port's own torch reference (same weights) run eagerly in PyTorch 2.11 cu128 with fp32 weights + autocast unless stated, no TensorRT; medians of 50 iterations after warm-up, H2D/D2H included; the p150a rows are the served bf16 fused path incl. upload/readback. p150a power was not measured, so no efficiency comparison is made. Full table: [`GPU_COMPARISON.md`](GPU_COMPARISON.md). ### Licensing - Weights: [magic-leap-community/superpoint](https://huggingface.co/magic-leap-community/superpoint), `other` ([Magic Leap SuperPoint licence](https://huggingface.co/magic-leap-community/superpoint/blob/main/LICENSE), noncommercial research use only); not redistributed here. - Port and serving code (`code/`): Apache-2.0 (SPDX headers on the modules), from [changh95/tt-superpoint](https://github.com/changh95/tt-superpoint), distributed under the same upstream terms since a port cannot grant more than its upstream does. ## Provenance The exact sources the image was built from — `code/` in this repo is byte-identical to the model code inside the image: | component | built from | | --- | --- | | tt-metal | [`8b98410e730bb504fea43a88609756e34821d91d`](https://github.com/tenstorrent/tt-metal/commit/8b98410e730bb504fea43a88609756e34821d91d) | | `code/` digest | `ae768681d4aa677d` (sha256, first 16 hex digits) | | built | 2026-09-13T15:21:44+00:00 by tt-model 0.1.0 |