Is there any information provided in the article about the cost of rail access from Miami to the port and who would be funding it?
Generate according to: A Miami-Dade County transportation board last week agreed to review the movement of Port of Miami freight by rail although a key proponent says port officials are skeptical.
When the Metropolitan Planning Organization Governing Board met Thursday, members considered solutions to a funding shortfall for a planned $1 billion-plus port tunnel.
Highlighting deficiencies with the county’s road network, Miami City Commissioner Johnny Winton suggested a modification to a resolution to incorporate a review of movement of port freight by rail.
"The port tunnel is going to pop up on Watson Island, jump off (State Road) 836 and go right by the $450 million Miami Performing Arts Center and a tremendous number of new condos," said Mr. Winton, "and all the cargo traffic is going to go right through there."
A feasibility study is expected to be ready by the end of the year. Mr. Winton said that is only part of the solution – the method of transporting goods through the tunnel is its complement.
"My concern is that once the cargo containers go over the river, they’re going to get half a mile down the road and in 15 or 20 years, they’re not going to go anywhere," he said, "because the cargo all has to go to west Miami-Dade because 836 is a mess and it’s going to be worse."
Viability of transporting freight by rail, he said, was discussed Oct. 17 at the port.
"There are significant forces opposed to this analysis, and they’re principally coming from the port," Mr. Winton said. "They don’t want this analysis done. They’re already convinced it doesn’t work. They told me."
Meanwhile, he said, officials at Florida East Coast Industries, which owns rights of way that are part of the project, has been cooperative, he said.
"I’ve had extensive discussions with President Adolfo Henriques and others from Florida East Coast Industries," Mr. Winton said. "The suggestion is that we look at a feasibility analysis to determine the impact of moving as much cargo as we can off the port by rail. We’d have to put the rail line in a tunnel or open trench.
"I don’t know what the appropriate vehicle is, and nobody else does right now. It would go (north) to 72nd Street and then go due west."
The original resolution before the governing board directed staff to develop a plan to finance the unfunded portion project and to identify additional improvements to help fill needs of the port – including rail access and other improvements.
Mr. Winton suggested and the board accepted a modification that added an obligation to commission an independent, objective study funded by the organization on the viability and cost of rail access from Miami to the port by surface or tunnel.
Is there any information provided in the article about the cost of rail access from Miami to the port and who would be funding it?
Generate according to: A Miami-Dade County transportation board last week agreed to review the movement of Port of Miami freight by rail although a key proponent says port officials are skeptical.
When the Metropolitan Planning Organization Governing Board met Thursday, members considered solutions to a funding shortfall for a planned $1 billion-plus port tunnel.
Highlighting deficiencies with the county’s road network, Miami City Commissioner Johnny Winton suggested a modification to a resolution to incorporate a review of movement of port freight by rail.
"The port tunnel is going to pop up on Watson Island, jump off (State Road) 836 and go right by the $450 million Miami Performing Arts Center and a tremendous number of new condos," said Mr. Winton, "and all the cargo traffic is going to go right through there."
A feasibility study is expected to be ready by the end of the year. Mr. Winton said that is only part of the solution – the method of transporting goods through the tunnel is its complement.
"My concern is that once the cargo containers go over the river, they’re going to get half a mile down the road and in 15 or 20 years, they’re not going to go anywhere," he said, "because the cargo all has to go to west Miami-Dade because 836 is a mess and it’s going to be worse."
Viability of transporting freight by rail, he said, was discussed Oct. 17 at the port.
"There are significant forces opposed to this analysis, and they’re principally coming from the port," Mr. Winton said. "They don’t want this analysis done. They’re already convinced it doesn’t work. They told me."
Meanwhile, he said, officials at Florida East Coast Industries, which owns rights of way that are part of the project, has been cooperative, he said.
"I’ve had extensive discussions with President Adolfo Henriques and others from Florida East Coast Industries," Mr. Winton said. "The suggestion is that we look at a feasibility analysis to determine the impact of moving as much cargo as we can off the port by rail. We’d have to put the rail line in a tunnel or open trench.
"I don’t know what the appropriate vehicle is, and nobody else does right now. It would go (north) to 72nd Street and then go due west."
The original resolution before the governing board directed staff to develop a plan to finance the unfunded portion project and to identify additional improvements to help fill needs of the port – including rail access and other improvements.
Mr. Winton suggested and the board accepted a modification that added an obligation to commission an independent, objective study funded by the organization on the viability and cost of rail access from Miami to the port by surface or tunnel.
user
The article mentions that a feasibility study is expected to be conducted by the end of the year to determine the viability of transporting freight by rail from Miami to the port. However, there is no information provided about the cost of the rail access or who would be funding it. The article only mentions that officials at Florida East Coast Industries are cooperative with the project.
assistant
Can you please provide more information on the funding shortfall for the port tunnel project in Miami-Dade County?
user
According to the article, there is a funding shortfall for a planned $1 billion-plus port tunnel in Miami-Dade County. The Metropolitan Planning Organization Governing Board met to consider solutions to this shortfall. Miami City Commissioner Johnny Winton suggested a modification to a resolution to incorporate a review of movement of port freight by rail. The original resolution directed staff to develop a plan to finance the unfunded portion of the project and to identify additional improvements to help fill needs of the port, including rail access and other improvements. However, there is no further information provided on the details of the funding shortfall and how it will be addressed.
assistant
Can you provide more details about the modifications made to the resolution regarding the review of the movement of port freight by rail?
user
According to the article, a modification was made to the original resolution to incorporate a review of the movement of port freight by rail. The modification added an obligation to commission an independent, objective study funded by the organization on the viability and cost of rail access from Miami to the port by surface or tunnel. The aim of the study is to determine the impact of moving as much cargo as possible off the port by rail. The study will analyze the feasibility of the rail access option and the cost implications. The feasibility study is expected to be ready by the end of the year, and no further details regarding the modifications were provided.
assistant
Can you tell me more about the deficiencies with the county's road network in relation to the movement of port freight?
user
In the article, Miami City Commissioner Johnny Winton highlights deficiencies with the county's road network in relation to the movement of port freight. He expressed concerns that the cargo containers would get stuck in traffic once they reach the road network outside of the port area. He said that the cargo has to go to west Miami-Dade, but the road system is already a mess and will only get worse. This is important because it suggests that without better transportation options, the movement of port freight could be severely hindered by local traffic conditions, which could lead to longer shipping times and increased costs. This is why Mr. Winton is advocating for a feasibility study into the potential of moving as much cargo as possible off the port by rail.
assistant