--- language: - en license: mit pretty_name: Aviation Avionics Isolation Reset and Containment Mapping v0.1 dataset_name: aviation-avionics-isolation-reset-containment-mapping-v0.1 tags: - clarusc64 - aviation - avionics - containment - recovery - redundancy-management - safety task_categories: - tabular-classification - tabular-regression size_categories: - n<1K configs: - config_name: default data_files: - split: train path: data/train.csv - split: test path: data/test.csv --- # Aviation Avionics Isolation Reset and Containment Mapping ## Purpose This dataset models how avionics systems should respond after divergence or fault detection. Detection alone does not prevent failure. The response determines whether the system stabilizes or cascades. This dataset trains systems to choose the correct containment and recovery strategy. ## Core concept Once redundant avionics systems diverge, the system must decide: - which unit to isolate - whether to reset - how to prevent propagation - how to preserve redundancy Incorrect containment can: - propagate corruption - remove healthy systems - overload pilots - escalate into failure The dataset focuses on optimal containment decisions. ## Task definition Given a divergence or fault scenario, the model must: - identify likely fault source - determine isolation priority - recommend reset or not - define containment boundary - estimate propagation risk - output minimal stabilization plan The objective is system coherence restoration. ## Required outputs - suspected_fault_source - isolation_priority - reset_recommendation - containment_boundary - propagation_risk_score - stabilization_confidence - minimal_action_set ## Data structure Each row represents a fault scenario. ### Key fields - scenario_id - aircraft_phase - subsystem_set - divergence_summary - fault_candidates - isolation_options - reset_options - containment_actions - propagation_risk - optimal_strategy - notes - constraints ## Why this dataset matters Avionics redundancy protects aircraft only if faults are handled correctly. Key risks: - isolating the wrong unit - resetting too early - failing to contain drift - losing redundancy This dataset trains coherent response selection. It moves from: fault detection → controlled stabilization. ## Evaluation Models are evaluated on: - correct fault source identification - appropriate isolation choice - reset decision accuracy - containment completeness - propagation risk estimation Scoring includes: - classification accuracy - action completeness - reasoning integrity ## Use cases - automated fault containment - redundancy management - flight safety decision support - avionics simulation - resilience engineering ## Relationship to companion dataset This dataset follows: aviation-avionics-narrative-drift-and-divergence-detection That dataset detects divergence. This dataset determines the response. Together they form a full loop: detect → contain → stabilize. ## Limitations Structured benchmark format. Not raw avionics logs. Future versions may include: - richer time-series - larger scenario sets - simulator-derived cases Version: v0.1