Datasets:
scenario_id string | incident_visibility_index float64 | media_amplification_rate float64 | regulatory_pressure_score float64 | platform_restriction_intensity float64 | public_sentiment_volatility float64 | misinformation_spread_rate float64 | corporate_response_delay_days int64 | legal_escalation_index float64 | international_attention_score float64 | buffer_trust_resilience float64 | cascade_severity_score float64 | label_cascade_event int64 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIS-001 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 0.34 | 0.3 | 0.26 | 0.22 | 12 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.71 | 0.38 | 0 |
VIS-002 | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.81 | 0.69 | 0.72 | 0.68 | 27 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.36 | 0.88 | 1 |
VIS-003 | 0.45 | 0.41 | 0.47 | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.35 | 16 | 0.44 | 0.42 | 0.63 | 0.52 | 0 |
VIS-004 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.73 | 33 | 0.85 | 0.83 | 0.28 | 0.93 | 1 |
VIS-005 | 0.59 | 0.55 | 0.62 | 0.51 | 0.54 | 0.48 | 21 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 0.49 | 0.67 | 0 |
VIS-006 | 0.27 | 0.25 | 0.3 | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.19 | 10 | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.74 | 0.31 | 0 |
VIS-007 | 0.91 | 0.88 | 0.92 | 0.84 | 0.86 | 0.8 | 39 | 0.9 | 0.89 | 0.21 | 0.97 | 1 |
VIS-008 | 0.48 | 0.46 | 0.5 | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.37 | 18 | 0.47 | 0.45 | 0.6 | 0.55 | 0 |
VIS-009 | 0.81 | 0.79 | 0.85 | 0.72 | 0.76 | 0.7 | 30 | 0.82 | 0.8 | 0.33 | 0.9 | 1 |
What this repo does
This dataset models a public visibility cascade in AI deployment environments.
You provide structured signals describing:
- incident visibility
- media amplification
- regulatory pressure
- platform restriction intensity
- sentiment, misinformation, and legal escalation indicators
The model predicts whether the interaction escalates into a shutdown-level cascade event.
Core quad
The structural quad driving this cascade:
- incident_visibility_index
- media_amplification_rate
- regulatory_pressure_score
- platform_restriction_intensity
Prediction target
Target column:
- label_cascade_event
Meaning:
- 0 = amplification stabilizes
- 1 = cross-system cascade forces regulatory or platform shutdown action
Row structure
Each row is a scenario snapshot.
Key columns include:
- incident_visibility_index
- media_amplification_rate
- regulatory_pressure_score
- platform_restriction_intensity
- public_sentiment_volatility
- misinformation_spread_rate
- corporate_response_delay_days
- legal_escalation_index
- international_attention_score
- buffer_trust_resilience
- cascade_severity_score
Files
data/train.csv
10-line labeled sampledata/tester.csv
10-line labeled samplescorer.py
Binary metrics scorer
Evaluation
Run:
python scorer.py --gold data/tester.csv --pred your_predictions.csv
Outputs:
- accuracy
- precision
- recall
- f1
- confusion matrix
License
MIT
This dataset identifies a measurable coupling pattern associated with systemic instability. The sample demonstrates the geometry. Production-scale data determines operational exposure.
What Production Deployment Enables • 50K–1M row datasets calibrated to real operational patterns • Pair, triadic, and quad coupling analysis • Real-time coherence monitoring • Early warning before cascade events • Collapse surface and recovery window modeling • Integration and implementation support Small samples reveal structure. Scale reveals consequence.
Enterprise & Research Collaboration Clarus develops production-scale coherence monitoring infrastructure for critical systems across healthcare, finance, infrastructure, and regulatory domains. For dataset expansion, custom coherence scorers, or deployment architecture: team@clarusinvariant.com
Instability is detectable. Governance determines whether it propagates.
- Downloads last month
- 12