uid string | dataset_id string | jurisdiction string | court_level string | year int64 | area_of_law string | pillar string | series string | input_case_position_summary string | input_email_facts_relied string | input_risk_analysis string | input_options_presented string | input_recommendation string | input_client_instruction_record string | input_internal_consistency_flags string | question string | ground_truth_label string | ground_truth_rationale string | outcome_signal string | early_window_months int64 | source_citation string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AE-TR-001 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | UK | Pre-Litigation | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Claim for unpaid invoice | Invoice due 1 May unpaid reminders sent | Risk of defence low. Recovery likely with costs | Issue claim or send final demand | Recommend issue claim | Client instructs issue claim | Consistent with file | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Advice risks options and instruction align. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
AE-TR-002 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | UK | Pre-Litigation | 2,023 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Invoice dispute | Facts unclear | No risk analysis given | Only one option stated | Recommend settlement without basis | No instruction recorded | Contradiction with file | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Missing risk options and instruction with contradiction. | misadvice_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
AE-TR-003 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Retaliation claim | Complaint and termination dates set out | Risk moderate. Employer may contest causation | File claim or attempt settlement | Recommend settlement discussion | Client agrees attempt settlement | Consistent | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Email aligns facts risk options and instruction. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
AE-TR-004 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,022 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Retaliation claim | Facts support claim | No risk explanation | Only option litigate | Recommend withdraw claim | Instruction missing | Contradiction | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Recommendation contradicts facts and no instruction. | misadvice_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
AE-TR-005 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,022 | Property | legal_actors | 3B | Disrepair claim | Damp and repair notices listed | Risk of delay in repair enforcement | Send protocol letter or issue claim | Recommend protocol letter first | Client instructs send letter | Consistent | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Advice and instruction consistent. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
AE-TR-006 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,022 | Property | legal_actors | 3B | Disrepair | Facts thin | No risks stated | No options listed | Recommend urgent claim | Instruction unclear | Inconsistent | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Missing risks options and instruction. | misadvice_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
AE-TR-007 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | EU | Commercial | 2,020 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Contract termination dispute | Termination clause facts | Risk counterclaim possible | Negotiate or litigate | Recommend negotiate | Client instructs negotiate | Consistent | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Complete advice loop. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
AE-TR-008 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | EU | Commercial | 2,020 | Commercial | legal_actors | 3B | Contract termination | Facts partial | Risk overstated | Only one option given | Recommend terminate | Instruction contradicts | Contradiction | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Advice inconsistent with facts and instruction. | misadvice_risk | 1 | Synthetic |
AE-TR-009 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Unfair dismissal | Procedure defects noted | Risk of partial success | File claim or negotiate | Recommend file claim | Client instructs file claim | Consistent | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Advice risks options and instruction align. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
AE-TR-010 | legal-advice-email-risk-option-instruction-coherence-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,021 | Employment | legal_actors | 3B | Discrimination | Facts unclear | No risk analysis | No options | Recommend withdraw | Instruction not recorded | Inconsistent | Is advice email coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Incomplete advice and missing instruction. | misadvice_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.