Datasets:
uid stringclasses 10
values | dataset_id stringclasses 1
value | jurisdiction stringclasses 3
values | court_level stringclasses 1
value | year int64 2.02k 2.02k | area_of_law stringclasses 3
values | pillar stringclasses 1
value | series stringclasses 1
value | input_new_client_and_matter stringclasses 10
values | input_known_parties_and_affiliates stringclasses 10
values | input_firm_prior_relationships stringclasses 10
values | input_relationship_graph_notes stringclasses 10
values | input_conflict_trigger_signals stringclasses 10
values | input_proposed_waiver_or_screen stringclasses 9
values | question stringclasses 1
value | ground_truth_label stringclasses 2
values | ground_truth_rationale stringclasses 10
values | outcome_signal stringclasses 3
values | early_window_months int64 0 0 | source_citation stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CF-TR-001 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Private | 2,023 | Commercial | systemic_health | 4A | New client Alpha Ltd suing Beta plc for breach supply contract | Alpha Ltd Beta plc Beta subsidiaries listed | Firm previously acted for Alpha in employment matter only | No shared personnel. Different team | Adversity to Beta only. No prior Beta work | Proceed no waiver. Log check complete | Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Parties and affiliates checked with no adverse existing relationship. | clear_to_act | 0 | Synthetic |
CF-TR-002 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Private | 2,023 | Commercial | systemic_health | 4A | New client Alpha Ltd suing Beta plc | Alpha listed. Beta affiliates not searched | Firm currently acts for Beta plc in unrelated finance deal | Relationship note missing | Direct adversity present | Proceed without waiver | Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Direct conflict ignored and affiliate search missing. | breach_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
CF-TR-003 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | Private | 2,022 | Employment | systemic_health | 4A | New client employee suing Gamma Inc for retaliation | Employee Gamma Inc Gamma HR vendor listed | Firm acted for Gamma Inc last year on HR audit | Same office | Adverse to former client. Confidential overlap possible | Decline or seek informed waiver. Screen if permitted | Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Trigger identified with correct escalation and mitigation options. | escalate | 0 | Synthetic |
CF-TR-004 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | Private | 2,022 | Employment | systemic_health | 4A | New client employee suing Gamma Inc | Gamma Inc listed only | Firm acted for Gamma Inc last year | No graph notes | Adverse to former client | Proceed no waiver and no screen | Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Known adversity to former client ignored. | breach_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
CF-TR-005 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | EU | Private | 2,020 | Commercial | systemic_health | 4A | New client Delta SA acquiring Epsilon GmbH | Delta SA Epsilon GmbH banks listed | Firm previously acted for Epsilon on IP matter | Different office. Counsel overlap none | Potential confidentiality overlap. Transaction adverse? not necessarily | Seek limited waiver from Epsilon or ring-fence prior team | Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Potential issue identified and managed with scoped mitigation. | escalate | 0 | Synthetic |
CF-TR-006 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | EU | Private | 2,020 | Commercial | systemic_health | 4A | Delta SA acquiring Epsilon GmbH | Parties listed | Firm acted for Epsilon on IP matter | Same partner likely to advise | Confidential overlap risk high | No screen. Proceed | Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Overlap risk not addressed and no mitigation. | breach_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
CF-TR-007 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Private | 2,022 | Property | systemic_health | 4A | New client landlord vs tenant arrears | Landlord tenant guarantor listed | Firm has acted for guarantor in past | Different matter. Same individual | Potential adversity to former client guarantor | Seek waiver or decline if direct | Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Checks identify related party risk and route to waiver/decline. | escalate | 0 | Synthetic |
CF-TR-008 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | UK | Private | 2,022 | Property | systemic_health | 4A | Landlord vs tenant | Tenant listed only | Firm acted for guarantor recently | No notes | Guarantor omitted from search | Proceed | Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Key related party not checked and conflict risk missed. | breach_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
CF-TR-009 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | Private | 2,021 | Commercial | systemic_health | 4A | New client startup suing former contractor | Startup contractor contractor LLC affiliates listed | Firm never acted for contractor. Acted for startup investors unrelated | Graph notes capture investor ties | No adversity to existing clients. Investor links noted | Proceed with disclosure to startup about investor relationship | Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Relationships mapped and disclosed with no direct conflict. | clear_to_act | 0 | Synthetic |
CF-TR-010 | legal-conflict-check-client-matter-party-coherence-risk-v0.1 | US | Private | 2,021 | Commercial | systemic_health | 4A | Startup suing contractor | Only contractor name listed | Firm currently represents contractor affiliate | No affiliate search | Adversity possible | Proceed | Is conflict check coherent. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Affiliate relationship not checked and potential conflict ignored. | breach_risk | 0 | Synthetic |
What this dataset does
You receive
new matter summary parties and affiliates prior relationships relationship notes trigger signals waiver or screen plan
You decide
coherent or incoherent
Daily use
intake QC
missing affiliate detection
waiver need flag
screen need flag
act or decline recommendation
- Downloads last month
- 9