uid stringclasses 10
values | dataset_id stringclasses 1
value | jurisdiction stringclasses 3
values | court_level stringclasses 5
values | year int64 2.02k 2.02k | area_of_law stringclasses 7
values | pillar stringclasses 1
value | series stringclasses 1
value | input_legal_aid_demand stringclasses 5
values | input_legal_aid_capacity stringclasses 9
values | input_representation_rate stringclasses 5
values | input_wait_time stringclasses 4
values | input_case_outcomes stringclasses 9
values | input_policy_signals stringclasses 10
values | question stringclasses 1
value | ground_truth_label stringclasses 2
values | ground_truth_rationale stringclasses 10
values | outcome_signal stringclasses 2
values | early_window_months int64 0 9 | source_citation stringclasses 1
value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LA-TR-001 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,021 | Civil | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Moderate demand | Adequate capacity | High representation | Short wait | Merits reached | Stable funding | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Capacity meets demand and representation remains high. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
LA-TR-002 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,020 | Family | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | High demand | Reduced capacity | Low representation | Long wait | Defaults and unsafe settlements | Funding cuts | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Demand exceeds supply leading to low representation. | access_failure_risk | 9 | Synthetic |
LA-TR-003 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | US | State | 2,019 | Housing | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | High eviction demand | Expanded aid capacity | Moderate representation | Manageable wait | More hearings on merits | Pilot funding | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Expanded capacity improves representation. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
LA-TR-004 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | US | State | 2,018 | Debt | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | High demand | Very low capacity | Very low representation | Long wait | Defaults dominate | Advocacy reports | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Severe capacity gap drives defaults. | access_failure_risk | 7 | Synthetic |
LA-TR-005 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | EU | Trial | 2,022 | Consumer | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Moderate demand | Adequate capacity | High representation | Short wait | Merits reached | Stable policy | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Balanced system keeps access intact. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
LA-TR-006 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | UK | Tribunal | 2,023 | Employment | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | High demand | Limited advisors | Low representation | Long wait | Claims abandoned | Review underway | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Advisor shortage leads to abandonment. | access_failure_risk | 6 | Synthetic |
LA-TR-007 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | US | Federal | 2,020 | Civil Rights | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Moderate demand | Clinic support available | Moderate representation | Manageable wait | Cases proceed | Grant funding | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Support structures align supply and demand. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
LA-TR-008 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | EU | Trial | 2,021 | Civil | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | Rising demand | Static capacity | Declining representation | Long wait | More pro se losses | Policy concern | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Static capacity under rising demand reduces representation. | access_failure_risk | 8 | Synthetic |
LA-TR-009 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | UK | County Court | 2,019 | Housing | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | High eviction demand | Emergency funding boost | Moderate representation | Shorter wait | More defended cases | Temporary funding | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | coherent | Emergency funding restored capacity temporarily. | stable | 0 | Synthetic |
LA-TR-010 | legal-aid-demand-capacity-coherence-decay-v0.1 | US | State | 2,021 | Family | systemic_legal_coherence | 4B | High custody demand | Limited aid lawyers | Low representation | Long wait | Unsafe agreements | Bar reports | Does aid capacity match demand. Answer coherent or incoherent. | incoherent | Capacity gap produces unsafe outcomes. | access_failure_risk | 5 | Synthetic |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.