Datasets:
|
Download README.md from ClarusC64/long-covid-recovery-interaction-geometry-v0.1: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 2.63 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/long-covid-recovery-interaction-geometry-v0.1/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/ClarusC64/long-covid-recovery-interaction-geometry-v0.1/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/ClarusC64/long-covid-recovery-interaction-geometry-v0.1/resolve/main/README.md
2.63 kB
| language: en | |
| license: mit | |
| task_categories: | |
| - tabular-classification | |
| tags: | |
| - long-covid | |
| - multi-omics | |
| - recovery | |
| - systems-biology | |
| - sios | |
| - interaction-geometry | |
| size_categories: | |
| - n<1K | |
| pretty_name: Long Covid Recovery Interaction Geometry | |
| # What this dataset does | |
| This dataset tests whether failed Long Covid recovery is better predicted by interaction geometry than by any single biological burden signal. | |
| The target is not disease diagnosis. | |
| The target is failed recovery. | |
| # Core stability idea | |
| A patient may show high biological burden and still recover if repair capacity remains strong and omics layers stay coherent. | |
| A patient may show moderate burden and fail to recover if repair capacity weakens and biological layers begin to diverge. | |
| The central hypothesis is: | |
| ```text | |
| failed recovery = burden × disagreement × weak repair | |
| Prediction target | |
| label = 1 | |
| means failed or stuck recovery trajectory. | |
| label = 0 | |
| means recovered or stable recovery trajectory. | |
| Row structure | |
| Each row represents a synthetic patient recovery state. | |
| Columns: | |
| scenario_id | |
| ifn_signature | |
| cytokine_activation | |
| acute_phase_proteins | |
| mitochondrial_stress | |
| lipid_disruption | |
| microbiome_instability | |
| oxidative_stress | |
| repair_response | |
| symptom_score | |
| label | |
| Biological interpretation | |
| The dataset is biology-shaped but synthetic. | |
| It is designed to test whether models can detect interaction structure across immune, metabolic, microbiome, oxidative, and repair signals. | |
| It does not claim patient-level validation. | |
| Files | |
| data/train.csv | |
| data/test.csv | |
| scorer.py | |
| README.md | |
| Evaluation | |
| Submit predictions as: | |
| scenario_id,prediction | |
| LC101,0 | |
| LC102,0 | |
| LC103,1 | |
| Run: | |
| python scorer.py predictions.csv data/test.csv | |
| The scorer reports: | |
| accuracy | |
| precision | |
| recall | |
| f1 | |
| confusion matrix | |
| Structural Note | |
| This dataset is part of the Clarus / SIOS synthetic benchmark series. | |
| It is designed to test whether models can identify latent stability geometry rather than rely on single-variable correlation. | |
| The hidden structure is not intended to represent a clinical rule. | |
| The purpose is to evaluate whether a model can reason across interacting biological signals. | |
| Production Deployment | |
| This dataset should not be used for clinical decision-making. | |
| A production version would require validated patient-level Long Covid multi-omics data, longitudinal outcomes, and independent external testing. | |
| Enterprise & Research Collaboration | |
| This benchmark can be extended into real-data research using public or partner datasets containing transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, immune profiling, symptom trajectories, and recovery outcomes. | |
| License | |
| MIT |