title: Competing theoretical frameworks to explain state behavior vis-a-vis the NPT : exploring the minimal role of the NPT in nuclear decision making
abstract: The impact of the NPT on nuclear decision-making appears to be minimal at best. Competing dominant strands of international relations theory cannot explain the lack of influence the NPT has on the decision to remain nuclear or choosing a path of nuclear forbearance. Dominant strands of international theory including realism, constructivism, and regime theory when considered alone give only shallow explanations for nuclear decision-making. Further, these theories cannot account for the existence 
journal: cIRcle (University of British Columbia)