Datasets:
Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ size_categories:
|
|
| 24 |
This dataset provides **synthetic interaction traces** for studying **mixed-initiative decision making** under uncertainty, with **attention-sensitive interruption costs** and **decision-theoretic thresholds** inspired by ideas in Eric Horvitz’s CHI’99 *LookOut* work.
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
**Source code:**
|
| 27 |
-
https://github.com/
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
**Developed by DBbun LLC — January 2026.**
|
| 30 |
|
|
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ A reproducible, decision-theoretic benchmark where each episode logs (i) calibra
|
|
| 48 |
Calibration metrics (AUROC, ECE), monotonicity checks, baseline policy comparisons, and diagnostics.
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
- **`mixed_initiative_traces.config.json`**
|
| 51 |
-
Full generator configuration including random seed,
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
---
|
| 54 |
|
|
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ Each row represents a **single mixed-initiative decision episode**.
|
|
| 133 |
Whether the suggested action was actually appropriate.
|
| 134 |
|
| 135 |
- **`p_true`** *(float, 0–1)*
|
| 136 |
-
Calibrated posterior probability of correctness.
|
| 137 |
|
| 138 |
- **`p_model`** *(float, 0–1)*
|
| 139 |
Agent’s reported belief after miscalibration.
|
|
@@ -211,34 +211,45 @@ Each row represents a **single mixed-initiative decision episode**.
|
|
| 211 |
|
| 212 |
### Expected utilities
|
| 213 |
|
| 214 |
-
These fields store the **expected utility values computed at decision time**, before sampling the user response.
|
|
|
|
| 215 |
|
| 216 |
- **`eu_no_action`** *(float)*
|
| 217 |
Expected utility of taking **no action**, balancing avoided interruption cost against delay or missed-opportunity cost.
|
| 218 |
|
| 219 |
- **`eu_action`** *(float)*
|
| 220 |
-
Expected utility of taking the **primary action immediately**, combining benefit, error penalty, and interruption cost.
|
| 221 |
|
| 222 |
- **`eu_dialog`** *(float)*
|
| 223 |
Expected utility of initiating **dialog or clarification**, trading lower risk for a chance to improve correctness.
|
| 224 |
|
| 225 |
- **`eu_scope`** *(float)*
|
| 226 |
-
Expected utility of taking a **scoped or partial action**, providing reduced risk with partial benefit.
|
| 227 |
|
| 228 |
---
|
| 229 |
|
| 230 |
### Analytic decision thresholds
|
| 231 |
|
| 232 |
-
Each threshold represents the **minimum belief probability** at which one action dominates another in expected utility.
|
|
|
|
| 233 |
|
| 234 |
-
- **`p_star_noaction_action`**
|
| 235 |
-
|
| 236 |
-
- **`p_star_dialog_action`**
|
| 237 |
-
- **`p_star_noaction_scope`**
|
| 238 |
-
- **`p_star_scope_action`**
|
| 239 |
-
- **`p_star_scope_dialog`**
|
| 240 |
|
| 241 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 242 |
|
| 243 |
---
|
| 244 |
|
|
|
|
| 24 |
This dataset provides **synthetic interaction traces** for studying **mixed-initiative decision making** under uncertainty, with **attention-sensitive interruption costs** and **decision-theoretic thresholds** inspired by ideas in Eric Horvitz’s CHI’99 *LookOut* work.
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
**Source code:**
|
| 27 |
+
https://github.com/DBbun/Mixed-Initiative-Lookout-CHI99
|
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
**Developed by DBbun LLC — January 2026.**
|
| 30 |
|
|
|
|
| 48 |
Calibration metrics (AUROC, ECE), monotonicity checks, baseline policy comparisons, and diagnostics.
|
| 49 |
|
| 50 |
- **`mixed_initiative_traces.config.json`**
|
| 51 |
+
Full generator configuration including random seed, utility matrices, attention model parameters, and constraints.
|
| 52 |
|
| 53 |
---
|
| 54 |
|
|
|
|
| 133 |
Whether the suggested action was actually appropriate.
|
| 134 |
|
| 135 |
- **`p_true`** *(float, 0–1)*
|
| 136 |
+
Calibrated posterior probability of correctness derived from latent evidence.
|
| 137 |
|
| 138 |
- **`p_model`** *(float, 0–1)*
|
| 139 |
Agent’s reported belief after miscalibration.
|
|
|
|
| 211 |
|
| 212 |
### Expected utilities
|
| 213 |
|
| 214 |
+
These fields store the **expected utility values computed at decision time**, before sampling the user response.
|
| 215 |
+
They are the quantities used by the policy to choose an action.
|
| 216 |
|
| 217 |
- **`eu_no_action`** *(float)*
|
| 218 |
Expected utility of taking **no action**, balancing avoided interruption cost against delay or missed-opportunity cost.
|
| 219 |
|
| 220 |
- **`eu_action`** *(float)*
|
| 221 |
+
Expected utility of taking the **primary action immediately**, combining expected benefit, error penalty, and interruption cost.
|
| 222 |
|
| 223 |
- **`eu_dialog`** *(float)*
|
| 224 |
Expected utility of initiating **dialog or clarification**, trading lower risk for a chance to improve correctness.
|
| 225 |
|
| 226 |
- **`eu_scope`** *(float)*
|
| 227 |
+
Expected utility of taking a **scoped or partial action**, providing reduced downside risk with partial benefit.
|
| 228 |
|
| 229 |
---
|
| 230 |
|
| 231 |
### Analytic decision thresholds
|
| 232 |
|
| 233 |
+
Each threshold represents the **minimum belief probability (`p_model`)** at which one action dominates another in **expected utility**.
|
| 234 |
+
All thresholds are computed **analytically** from the utility model.
|
| 235 |
|
| 236 |
+
- **`p_star_noaction_action`** *(float, 0–1)*
|
| 237 |
+
Threshold above which **action** is preferable to **no action**.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 238 |
|
| 239 |
+
- **`p_star_noaction_dialog`** *(float, 0–1)*
|
| 240 |
+
Threshold above which **dialog** is preferable to **no action**.
|
| 241 |
+
|
| 242 |
+
- **`p_star_dialog_action`** *(float, 0–1)*
|
| 243 |
+
Threshold above which **action** is preferable to **dialog**.
|
| 244 |
+
|
| 245 |
+
- **`p_star_noaction_scope`** *(float, 0–1)*
|
| 246 |
+
Threshold above which **scope** is preferable to **no action**.
|
| 247 |
+
|
| 248 |
+
- **`p_star_scope_action`** *(float, 0–1)*
|
| 249 |
+
Threshold above which **action** is preferable to **scope**.
|
| 250 |
+
|
| 251 |
+
- **`p_star_scope_dialog`** *(float, 0–1)*
|
| 252 |
+
Threshold above which **dialog** is preferable to **scope**.
|
| 253 |
|
| 254 |
---
|
| 255 |
|