Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
Search is not available for this dataset
subset
int64
0
99
query
int64
0
19
diff
float64
-0.01
0.01
score_sum
float64
-0.02
0.02
0
0
0.002764
-0.0003
0
1
0.000305
0.001337
0
2
-0.00066
0.000109
0
3
0.000388
-0.001056
0
4
-0.000461
-0.000041
0
5
-0.00027
0.000599
0
6
-0.001759
0.000781
0
7
0.00088
0.000298
0
8
-0.001327
-0.000947
0
9
-0.00079
-0.001456
0
10
0.000752
-0.000601
0
11
-0.001413
0.001041
0
12
-0.001335
-0.000728
0
13
-0.002938
-0.001447
0
14
-0.000157
-0.000381
0
15
0.000515
0.000182
0
16
-0.001933
-0.001052
0
17
0.000113
0.001034
0
18
0.000752
0.00042
0
19
-0.003185
-0.001793
1
0
0.000252
0.001264
1
1
-0.000837
-0.007357
1
2
-0.002009
0.000301
1
3
0.002215
0.012796
1
4
-0.000489
-0.000294
1
5
0.002465
-0.005566
1
6
0.000548
-0.007041
1
7
0.00029
-0.003922
1
8
0.00088
-0.000374
1
9
0.000767
0.000185
1
10
0.000648
0.002885
1
11
-0.002601
0.000401
1
12
-0.000574
0.00057
1
13
-0.00189
-0.000282
1
14
0.000336
-0.002762
1
15
-0.001614
0.004383
1
16
-0.001099
-0.001465
1
17
-0.000463
0.001377
1
18
0.00147
-0.006073
1
19
0.001417
0.000802
2
0
0.002055
0.00049
2
1
-0.001759
-0.004732
2
2
-0.003499
-0.000693
2
3
0.00099
0.006649
2
4
-0.001874
-0.000069
2
5
-0.001037
-0.004389
2
6
-0.002508
-0.004361
2
7
-0.00124
-0.002959
2
8
-0.000313
-0.000413
2
9
-0.000768
0.000727
2
10
-0.002918
-0.000643
2
11
-0.001024
0.002342
2
12
0.002156
0.005218
2
13
-0.001185
0.000116
2
14
-0.000314
-0.001605
2
15
-0.002185
0.002138
2
16
-0.001001
-0.002477
2
17
0.000582
0.001347
2
18
0.000348
-0.005762
2
19
-0.002719
-0.000475
3
0
-0.000303
-0.000137
3
1
-0.000858
0.003115
3
2
0.000085
-0.000495
3
3
0.0013
-0.003565
3
4
-0.000502
-0.000044
3
5
-0.001252
0.001366
3
6
0.001267
0.002508
3
7
-0.000436
0.00079
3
8
-0.001656
-0.000355
3
9
-0.000568
-0.000534
3
10
0.000704
-0.000361
3
11
0.001435
0.002032
3
12
0.001215
0.00048
3
13
0.001228
-0.000153
3
14
0.001199
0.003129
3
15
0.000326
-0.000927
3
16
-0.000921
-0.000741
3
17
-0.001263
-0.000487
3
18
-0.000757
0.002868
3
19
0.000088
-0.001192
4
0
0.000421
-0.001558
4
1
-0.001363
0.000487
4
2
-0.000029
0.000473
4
3
0.001247
-0.002087
4
4
-0.00131
-0.001404
4
5
-0.003523
0.0012
4
6
-0.004735
0.001392
4
7
-0.001059
0.000993
4
8
0.000472
0.001197
4
9
-0.000243
0.000737
4
10
0.000669
0.000363
4
11
0.000921
0.001484
4
12
-0.001887
-0.000366
4
13
-0.000915
-0.000266
4
14
0.000464
0.000726
4
15
0.000064
0.000157
4
16
-0.000502
0.000838
4
17
0.001441
0.001385
4
18
0.001686
0.001511
4
19
-0.001892
-0.002039
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

Retrain bank: plan_muon_eps1e17_4k_bs256

This repository contains 100 fully retrained language models, not just scores.

Each model is GPT-2 (gpt2) fine-tuned on the same 4,000-document corpus with a different random 1% (40 documents) held out, from the same seed and the same data order as the base model in retrained/base. Retraining is deterministic within one environment, so the models differ only by the documents removed.

That is the expensive part of any leave-k-out attribution study, and it is reusable: a new attribution method can be evaluated against this bank without retraining anything.

What is here

path what it is
retrained/base/ the unablated fine-tuned model
retrained/subset_*/ 100 models, each missing a different 1% of the corpus
validation.csv the ground truth: per (subset, query) change in loss caused by that removal
subsets.json which document ids each subset removed
config.yaml the exact training configuration
filter_proponents_*/ tail-filter results: loss change when a scorer's top-ranked 1% is removed

Using it

from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download
import pandas as pd

path = snapshot_download("EleutherAI/metasmoothness-bank-plan_muon_eps1e17_4k_bs256", repo_type="dataset")

# ground truth: what removing each subset did to each query's loss
truth = pd.read_csv(f"{path}/validation.csv")

# score your own method, then correlate its predicted influence against `diff`
# LDS = mean over queries of Spearman(predicted subset sums, measured diff)

Measured on this bank

metric value
MAGIC LDS 0.3020
EK-FAC LDS 0.3031
metasmoothness 0.9037
tail-filter delta, MAGIC 0.01345 nats
tail-filter delta, EK-FAC 0.01844 nats
tail-filter delta, random control 0.00025 nats

LDS is the mean per-query Spearman correlation between a scorer's predicted subset influence and the measured diff. The tail-filter delta is a different question on the same bank: remove the 1% a scorer ranks most influential, retrain once, and measure the query loss change against the bank's random removals as the matched control.

Provenance

  • optimizer muon, lr 0.0004, batch size 256, 2 epochs, 32 steps, seed 42
  • corpus: smollm2, 4,000 documents
  • retrains for one bank all run on a single GPU type: mixing types changes the retrained models by enough to shift LDS by ~0.05, which is larger than most effects being measured.

Produced by bergson.

Downloads last month
46

Collection including EleutherAI/LDS-retrain-bank-muon-N4k-bs256