repo2rlenv-swe-next / tasks /swe-next-1a113b4bab7fa544fc2b /environment /source /tests /property /test_specifier_implied.py
Download tasks/swe-next-1a113b4bab7fa544fc2b/environment/source/tests/property/test_specifier_implied.py from FineEnvs/repo2rlenv-swe-next: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 30.9 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/FineEnvs/repo2rlenv-swe-next/resolve/main/tasks/swe-next-1a113b4bab7fa544fc2b/environment/source/tests/property/test_specifier_implied.py
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/FineEnvs/repo2rlenv-swe-next/tasks/swe-next-1a113b4bab7fa544fc2b/environment/source/tests/property/test_specifier_implied.py
-
curl -L -o test_specifier_implied.py https://huggingface.co/datasets/FineEnvs/repo2rlenv-swe-next/resolve/main/tasks/swe-next-1a113b4bab7fa544fc2b/environment/source/tests/property/test_specifier_implied.py
30.9 kB
| # This file is dual licensed under the terms of the Apache License, Version | |
| # 2.0, and the BSD License. See the LICENSE file in the root of this repository | |
| # for complete details. | |
| from __future__ import annotations | |
| import pytest | |
| from hypothesis import assume, given | |
| from hypothesis import strategies as st | |
| from packaging.specifiers import Specifier, SpecifierSet | |
| from packaging.version import Version | |
| from tests.property.strategies import ( | |
| SETTINGS, | |
| local_labels, | |
| nonlocal_versions, | |
| pep440_versions, | |
| pre_tags, | |
| related_version_triple, | |
| release_versions, | |
| small_ints, | |
| specifier_sets, | |
| ) | |
| pytestmark = pytest.mark.property | |
| class TestFilterContainmentConsistency: | |
| """Implied by the definitions of filter() and contains(): filtering a list | |
| of versions should produce exactly the versions that individually satisfy | |
| the specifier.""" | |
| def test_filter_equals_manual_containment( | |
| self, spec: SpecifierSet, versions: list[Version] | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """filter(vs) should equal [v for v in vs if v in spec].""" | |
| strs = [str(v) for v in versions] | |
| filtered = list(spec.filter(strs, prereleases=True)) | |
| manual = [s for s in strs if spec.contains(s, prereleases=True)] | |
| assert filtered == manual | |
| def test_filter_preserves_order( | |
| self, spec: SpecifierSet, versions: list[Version] | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """filter() must return versions in the same order as the input.""" | |
| strs = [str(v) for v in versions] | |
| filtered = list(spec.filter(strs, prereleases=True)) | |
| # The filtered list must be a subsequence of the input. | |
| it = iter(strs) | |
| for f in filtered: | |
| for s in it: | |
| if s == f: | |
| break | |
| else: | |
| raise AssertionError(f"{f} not found in remaining input") | |
| def test_filter_is_subset_of_input( | |
| self, spec: SpecifierSet, versions: list[Version] | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """Every version in filter output was in the input.""" | |
| strs = [str(v) for v in versions] | |
| filtered = list(spec.filter(strs, prereleases=True)) | |
| for v in filtered: | |
| assert v in strs | |
| class TestSpecifierSetAndConsistency: | |
| """Implied by the definition of SpecifierSet.__and__: the & operator | |
| combines two specifier sets, and the result should match a version iff | |
| both operands match it.""" | |
| def test_and_matches_iff_both_match( | |
| self, | |
| specifier_a: SpecifierSet, | |
| specifier_b: SpecifierSet, | |
| version: Version, | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """(a & b).contains(v) iff a.contains(v) and b.contains(v).""" | |
| combined = specifier_a & specifier_b | |
| both = specifier_a.contains(version, prereleases=True) and specifier_b.contains( | |
| version, prereleases=True | |
| ) | |
| assert combined.contains(version, prereleases=True) == both | |
| def test_and_is_commutative( | |
| self, | |
| specifier_a: SpecifierSet, | |
| specifier_b: SpecifierSet, | |
| version: Version, | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """a & b and b & a accept the same versions.""" | |
| ab = specifier_a & specifier_b | |
| b_and_a = specifier_b & specifier_a | |
| assert ab.contains(version, prereleases=True) == b_and_a.contains( | |
| version, prereleases=True | |
| ) | |
| class TestSpecifierRoundTrip: | |
| """Implied by the normalization rules: parsing a specifier and converting | |
| it back to a string should produce a stable, equivalent representation.""" | |
| def test_specifier_str_round_trip(self, version: Version) -> None: | |
| """Specifier(str(Specifier(s))) == Specifier(s).""" | |
| for op in [">=", "<=", ">", "<", "==", "!="]: | |
| s = f"{op}{version}" | |
| assert Specifier(str(Specifier(s))) == Specifier(s) | |
| def test_specifier_set_str_round_trip(self, version: Version) -> None: | |
| """SpecifierSet(str(SpecifierSet(s))) == SpecifierSet(s).""" | |
| s = f">={version},<={version}" | |
| assert SpecifierSet(str(SpecifierSet(s))) == SpecifierSet(s) | |
| def test_specifier_set_str_round_trip_general(self, spec: SpecifierSet) -> None: | |
| """Any SpecifierSet round-trips through str.""" | |
| assert SpecifierSet(str(spec)) == spec | |
| class TestVersionPropertyConsistency: | |
| """Implied by the version scheme: the .public, .base_version, .major, | |
| .minor, .micro properties must be consistent with the parsed version | |
| components.""" | |
| def test_public_strips_local(self, version: Version) -> None: | |
| """Version(v.public) equals v with local removed.""" | |
| pub = Version(version.public) | |
| assert pub == version.__replace__(local=None) | |
| def test_base_version_strips_suffixes(self, version: Version) -> None: | |
| """Version(v.base_version) has no pre/post/dev/local.""" | |
| base = Version(version.base_version) | |
| assert base.pre is None | |
| assert base.post is None | |
| assert base.dev is None | |
| assert base.local is None | |
| assert base.release == version.release | |
| assert base.epoch == version.epoch | |
| def test_major_minor_micro_agree_with_release(self, version: Version) -> None: | |
| """major/minor/micro are the first three release components.""" | |
| assert version.major == version.release[0] | |
| assert version.minor == (version.release[1] if len(version.release) > 1 else 0) | |
| assert version.micro == (version.release[2] if len(version.release) > 2 else 0) | |
| def test_is_prerelease_iff_pre_or_dev(self, version: Version) -> None: | |
| """is_prerelease is True iff pre or dev is set.""" | |
| assert version.is_prerelease == ( | |
| version.pre is not None or version.dev is not None | |
| ) | |
| def test_is_postrelease_iff_post(self, version: Version) -> None: | |
| """is_postrelease is True iff post is set.""" | |
| assert version.is_postrelease == (version.post is not None) | |
| def test_is_devrelease_iff_dev(self, version: Version) -> None: | |
| """is_devrelease is True iff dev is set.""" | |
| assert version.is_devrelease == (version.dev is not None) | |
| def test_public_version_ordering(self, version: Version) -> None: | |
| """A version with local is >= its public version.""" | |
| pub = Version(version.public) | |
| assert version >= pub | |
| class TestMetamorphicVersionModifications: | |
| """Implied by the ordering rules: known modifications to a version | |
| should produce predictable ordering changes.""" | |
| def test_adding_post_increases(self, version: Version) -> None: | |
| """V.postN > V for any final release V.""" | |
| post = Version(f"{version}.post0") | |
| assert post > version | |
| def test_adding_dev_decreases(self, version: Version) -> None: | |
| """V.devN < V for any final release V.""" | |
| dev = Version(f"{version}.dev0") | |
| assert dev < version | |
| def test_adding_pre_decreases( | |
| self, version: Version, tag: str, number: int | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """V.aN/bN/rcN < V for any final release V.""" | |
| pre = Version(f"{version}{tag}{number}") | |
| assert pre < version | |
| def test_bumping_last_segment_increases(self, version: Version) -> None: | |
| """Incrementing the last release segment produces a greater version.""" | |
| release = list(version.release) | |
| release[-1] += 1 | |
| bumped_str = ".".join(str(s) for s in release) | |
| if version.epoch: | |
| bumped_str = f"{version.epoch}!{bumped_str}" | |
| bumped = Version(bumped_str) | |
| assert bumped > version | |
| def test_higher_epoch_always_wins( | |
| self, version: Version, higher_epoch: int | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """A version with a higher epoch is always greater.""" | |
| epoch = version.epoch + higher_epoch | |
| other = Version(f"{epoch}!0") | |
| assert other > version | |
| def test_appending_zero_segment_is_equal(self, version: Version) -> None: | |
| """V.0 == V due to zero-padding rules.""" | |
| extended = Version(f"{version}.0") | |
| assert extended == version | |
| def test_adding_local_does_not_decrease(self, version: Version, local: str) -> None: | |
| """V+local >= V for any version.""" | |
| with_local = Version(f"{version}+{local}") | |
| assert with_local >= version | |
| class TestCompatibleReleaseBounds: | |
| """Implied by the compatible release definition: ~=V.N is equivalent | |
| to >=V.N, ==V.*, which means it has a clear lower and upper bound.""" | |
| def test_compatible_lower_bound(self, version: Version, candidate: Version) -> None: | |
| """If candidate matches ~=V then candidate >= V.""" | |
| assume(candidate.local is None and len(version.release) >= 2) | |
| spec = Specifier(f"~={version}") | |
| if spec.contains(candidate, prereleases=True): | |
| assert candidate >= version | |
| def test_compatible_upper_bound(self, version: Version, candidate: Version) -> None: | |
| """If candidate matches ~=V.N then candidate < (V_prefix+1).0.""" | |
| assume(candidate.local is None and len(version.release) >= 2) | |
| spec = Specifier(f"~={version}") | |
| if spec.contains(candidate, prereleases=True): | |
| # Build the upper bound: bump the second-to-last segment. | |
| prefix = list(version.release[:-1]) | |
| prefix[-1] += 1 | |
| upper = Version(".".join(str(s) for s in prefix)) | |
| if version.epoch: | |
| upper = Version(f"{version.epoch}!{upper}") | |
| assert candidate < upper | |
| def test_compatible_matches_iff_expansion_matches( | |
| self, version: Version, candidate: Version | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """~=V.N matches iff >=V.N, ==V.* both match.""" | |
| assume(candidate.local is None and len(version.release) >= 2) | |
| tilde = Specifier(f"~={version}") | |
| # Build the expansion: >=V, ==prefix.* | |
| prefix = ".".join(str(s) for s in version.release[:-1]) | |
| if version.epoch: | |
| prefix = f"{version.epoch}!{prefix}" | |
| expanded = SpecifierSet(f">={version},=={prefix}.*") | |
| assert tilde.contains(candidate, prereleases=True) == expanded.contains( | |
| candidate, prereleases=True | |
| ) | |
| class TestTrichotomy: | |
| """Implied by the version ordering being a total order and the specifier | |
| definitions. The inclusive operators (>=, <=) have no exclusion rules | |
| and together with == form a true trichotomy. The exclusive operators | |
| (>, <) have pre/post/local exclusions so they are subsets of the | |
| inclusive operators.""" | |
| def test_inclusive_trichotomy( | |
| self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """Exactly one of <=S (and not ==S), ==S, >=S (and not ==S) holds. | |
| Equivalently: >=S and <=S partition the version space into three | |
| disjoint groups (less, equal, greater) with ==S being the middle.""" | |
| less_equal = Specifier(f"<={specifier_version}").contains( | |
| candidate, prereleases=True | |
| ) | |
| equal = Specifier(f"=={specifier_version}").contains( | |
| candidate, prereleases=True | |
| ) | |
| greater_equal = Specifier(f">={specifier_version}").contains( | |
| candidate, prereleases=True | |
| ) | |
| # If equal, both inclusive ops match. | |
| if equal: | |
| assert less_equal | |
| assert greater_equal | |
| else: | |
| # Exactly one of <=S or >=S matches (not both, since == is | |
| # excluded, and at least one must hold by totality). | |
| assert less_equal != greater_equal, ( | |
| f"candidate={candidate}, spec={specifier_version}: " | |
| f"<={less_equal}, =={equal}, >={greater_equal}" | |
| ) | |
| def test_greater_equal_equals_greater_than_or_equal( | |
| self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """>=S matches iff >S or ==S matches. | |
| This may fail for pre/post/local-excluded versions (where >S | |
| rejects a version that is strictly greater in ordering). When | |
| it does, it reveals the exclusion gaps in > and <.""" | |
| greater_equal = Specifier(f">={specifier_version}").contains( | |
| candidate, prereleases=True | |
| ) | |
| greater_than = Specifier(f">{specifier_version}").contains( | |
| candidate, prereleases=True | |
| ) | |
| equal = Specifier(f"=={specifier_version}").contains( | |
| candidate, prereleases=True | |
| ) | |
| # >V is a subset of >=V, and ==V is a subset of >=V, so | |
| # (greater_than or equal) implies greater_equal. The reverse also | |
| # holds: >=V matches only if the candidate is either strictly greater | |
| # or equal, and the exclusions in >V only reduce its set. | |
| if greater_than or equal: | |
| assert greater_equal | |
| # The converse (greater_equal implies greater_than or equal) can fail | |
| # when >V excludes a post/pre/local of V. That gap is tested by the | |
| # cross-operator consistency tests elsewhere. | |
| def test_less_equal_equals_less_than_or_equal( | |
| self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """<=S matches iff <S or ==S matches (same caveat as above).""" | |
| less_equal = Specifier(f"<={specifier_version}").contains( | |
| candidate, prereleases=True | |
| ) | |
| less_than = Specifier(f"<{specifier_version}").contains( | |
| candidate, prereleases=True | |
| ) | |
| equal = Specifier(f"=={specifier_version}").contains( | |
| candidate, prereleases=True | |
| ) | |
| if less_than or equal: | |
| assert less_equal | |
| class TestZeroPaddingSpecifierInvariance: | |
| """Implied by the zero-padding rules: if V == V.0 as versions, then | |
| every specifier must treat them identically.""" | |
| def test_zero_padded_candidate_matches_same_specifiers( | |
| self, version: Version, candidate: Version | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """spec.contains(V) == spec.contains(V.0) for all specifiers.""" | |
| padded = candidate.__replace__(release=(*candidate.release, 0)) | |
| for op in [">=", "<=", ">", "<", "==", "!="]: | |
| spec = Specifier(f"{op}{version}") | |
| assert spec.contains(candidate, prereleases=True) == spec.contains( | |
| padded, prereleases=True | |
| ), f"{op}{version}: {candidate} and {padded} disagree" | |
| class TestPrereleaseFlagOnlyAffectsPreReleases: | |
| """Implied by the pre-release handling rules: the prereleases flag | |
| should only affect versions that are actually pre-releases.""" | |
| def test_non_prerelease_unaffected_by_flag( | |
| self, spec: SpecifierSet, version: Version | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """For non-prerelease versions, prereleases flag has no effect.""" | |
| assume(not version.is_prerelease and version.local is None) | |
| assert spec.contains(version, prereleases=True) == spec.contains( | |
| version, prereleases=False | |
| ) | |
| class TestAndAgreesWithStringConcatenation: | |
| """Implied by SpecifierSet.__and__ semantics: the & operator should | |
| produce the same containment results as comma-joining the specifier | |
| strings.""" | |
| def test_and_equals_comma_join( | |
| self, | |
| specifier_a: SpecifierSet, | |
| specifier_b: SpecifierSet, | |
| version: Version, | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """(a & b).contains(v) == SpecifierSet(f"{a},{b}").contains(v).""" | |
| via_and = (specifier_a & specifier_b).contains(version, prereleases=True) | |
| joined = str(specifier_a) + ("," + str(specifier_b) if str(specifier_b) else "") | |
| via_str = SpecifierSet(joined).contains(version, prereleases=True) | |
| assert via_and == via_str | |
| class TestLocalInvarianceForOrderingSpecifiers: | |
| """Implied by the spec: local version labels MUST be ignored entirely | |
| when checking if candidate versions match a given version specifier | |
| (except == with a local label).""" | |
| def test_local_ignored_for_all_ordering_ops( | |
| self, version: Version, specifier_version: Version, local: str | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """Adding local to a candidate doesn't change ordering specifier | |
| results.""" | |
| with_local = Version(f"{version}+{local}") | |
| for op in [">=", "<=", ">", "<", "~="]: | |
| if op == "~=" and len(specifier_version.release) < 2: | |
| continue | |
| spec = Specifier(f"{op}{specifier_version}") | |
| assert spec.contains(version, prereleases=True) == spec.contains( | |
| with_local, prereleases=True | |
| ), f"{op}{specifier_version}: {version} and {with_local} disagree" | |
| class TestComplementFilterPartition: | |
| """Implied by != being the exact complement of ==: filtering with | |
| == and != should partition the input list exactly.""" | |
| def test_equal_not_equal_partition_versions( | |
| self, specifier_version: Version, versions: list[Version] | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """filter(==V, vs) + filter(!=V, vs) == vs (as multisets).""" | |
| strs = [str(v) for v in versions if v.local is None] | |
| equal_spec = SpecifierSet(f"=={specifier_version}") | |
| not_equal_spec = SpecifierSet(f"!={specifier_version}") | |
| equal_filtered = list(equal_spec.filter(strs, prereleases=True)) | |
| not_equal_filtered = list(not_equal_spec.filter(strs, prereleases=True)) | |
| assert sorted(equal_filtered + not_equal_filtered) == sorted(strs) | |
| def test_equal_not_equal_wildcard_partition_versions( | |
| self, specifier_version: Version, versions: list[Version] | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """filter(==V.*, vs) + filter(!=V.*, vs) == vs (as multisets).""" | |
| strs = [str(v) for v in versions if v.local is None] | |
| equal_spec = SpecifierSet(f"=={specifier_version}.*") | |
| not_equal_spec = SpecifierSet(f"!={specifier_version}.*") | |
| equal_filtered = list(equal_spec.filter(strs, prereleases=True)) | |
| not_equal_filtered = list(not_equal_spec.filter(strs, prereleases=True)) | |
| assert sorted(equal_filtered + not_equal_filtered) == sorted(strs) | |
| class TestCrossOperatorConsistency: | |
| """Implied by the combination of the inclusive and exclusive ordered | |
| comparison sections, plus the version matching and exclusion sections. | |
| The six comparison operators (>=, <=, >, <, ==, !=) are defined | |
| independently but their semantics must be consistent with each other | |
| and with the version ordering.""" | |
| def test_greater_than_is_subset_of_greater_equal( | |
| self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """If v matches >V then v must also match >=V.""" | |
| greater_than = Specifier(f">{specifier_version}") | |
| greater_equal = Specifier(f">={specifier_version}") | |
| if greater_than.contains(candidate, prereleases=True): | |
| assert greater_equal.contains(candidate, prereleases=True), ( | |
| f">{specifier_version} accepts {candidate} " | |
| f"but >={specifier_version} rejects it" | |
| ) | |
| def test_less_than_is_subset_of_less_equal( | |
| self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """If v matches <V then v must also match <=V.""" | |
| less_than = Specifier(f"<{specifier_version}") | |
| less_equal = Specifier(f"<={specifier_version}") | |
| if less_than.contains(candidate, prereleases=True): | |
| assert less_equal.contains(candidate, prereleases=True), ( | |
| f"<{specifier_version} accepts {candidate} " | |
| f"but <={specifier_version} rejects it" | |
| ) | |
| def test_greater_than_and_less_than_are_disjoint( | |
| self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """No version can match both >V and <V.""" | |
| greater_than = Specifier(f">{specifier_version}") | |
| less_than = Specifier(f"<{specifier_version}") | |
| assert not ( | |
| greater_than.contains(candidate, prereleases=True) | |
| and less_than.contains(candidate, prereleases=True) | |
| ), f"{candidate} matches both >{specifier_version} and <{specifier_version}" | |
| def test_greater_equal_and_less_equal_intersection_implies_equal( | |
| self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """If v matches both >=V and <=V then v must match ==V.""" | |
| greater_equal = Specifier(f">={specifier_version}") | |
| less_equal = Specifier(f"<={specifier_version}") | |
| equal = Specifier(f"=={specifier_version}") | |
| if greater_equal.contains(candidate, prereleases=True) and less_equal.contains( | |
| candidate, prereleases=True | |
| ): | |
| assert equal.contains(candidate, prereleases=True), ( | |
| f"{candidate} matches >={specifier_version} and " | |
| f"<={specifier_version} but not =={specifier_version}" | |
| ) | |
| def test_not_equal_accepts_everything_greater_than_accepts( | |
| self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """If v matches >V then v must also match !=V.""" | |
| greater_than = Specifier(f">{specifier_version}") | |
| not_equal = Specifier(f"!={specifier_version}") | |
| if greater_than.contains(candidate, prereleases=True): | |
| assert not_equal.contains(candidate, prereleases=True), ( | |
| f">{specifier_version} accepts {candidate} " | |
| f"but !={specifier_version} rejects it" | |
| ) | |
| def test_not_equal_accepts_everything_less_than_accepts( | |
| self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """If v matches <V then v must also match !=V.""" | |
| less_than = Specifier(f"<{specifier_version}") | |
| not_equal = Specifier(f"!={specifier_version}") | |
| if less_than.contains(candidate, prereleases=True): | |
| assert not_equal.contains(candidate, prereleases=True), ( | |
| f"<{specifier_version} accepts {candidate} " | |
| f"but !={specifier_version} rejects it" | |
| ) | |
| def test_greater_equal_monotonic( | |
| self, specifier_version: Version, version_a: Version, version_b: Version | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """If a matches >=V and b >= a, then b must also match >=V.""" | |
| spec = Specifier(f">={specifier_version}") | |
| if spec.contains(version_a, prereleases=True) and version_b >= version_a: | |
| assert spec.contains(version_b, prereleases=True), ( | |
| f">={specifier_version} accepts {version_a} but rejects " | |
| f"{version_b} even though {version_b} >= {version_a}" | |
| ) | |
| def test_less_equal_monotonic( | |
| self, specifier_version: Version, version_a: Version, version_b: Version | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """If a matches <=V and b <= a, then b must also match <=V.""" | |
| spec = Specifier(f"<={specifier_version}") | |
| if spec.contains(version_a, prereleases=True) and version_b <= version_a: | |
| assert spec.contains(version_b, prereleases=True), ( | |
| f"<={specifier_version} accepts {version_a} but rejects " | |
| f"{version_b} even though {version_b} <= {version_a}" | |
| ) | |
| def test_equal_wildcard_is_superset_of_equal( | |
| self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """If v matches ==V then v must also match ==V.*.""" | |
| # Wildcards are only valid on pure release segments. | |
| assume( | |
| not specifier_version.is_devrelease | |
| and not specifier_version.is_prerelease | |
| and not specifier_version.is_postrelease | |
| ) | |
| equal = Specifier(f"=={specifier_version}") | |
| equal_wild = Specifier(f"=={specifier_version}.*") | |
| if equal.contains(candidate, prereleases=True): | |
| assert equal_wild.contains(candidate, prereleases=True), ( | |
| f"=={specifier_version} accepts {candidate} " | |
| f"but =={specifier_version}.* rejects it" | |
| ) | |
| def test_greater_than_monotonic( | |
| self, | |
| specifier_version: Version, | |
| version_a: Version, | |
| version_b: Version, | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """If a matches >V and b > a, then b must also match >V.""" | |
| spec = Specifier(f">{specifier_version}") | |
| if spec.contains(version_a, prereleases=True) and version_b > version_a: | |
| assert spec.contains(version_b, prereleases=True), ( | |
| f">{specifier_version} accepts {version_a} " | |
| f"but rejects {version_b} even though " | |
| f"{version_b} > {version_a}" | |
| ) | |
| def test_greater_than_monotonic_related( | |
| self, triple: tuple[Version, Version, Version] | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """If a matches >V and b > a, then b must also match >V. | |
| Same property as above but with versions sharing a release segment.""" | |
| specifier_version, version_a, version_b = triple | |
| spec = Specifier(f">{specifier_version}") | |
| if spec.contains(version_a, prereleases=True) and version_b > version_a: | |
| assert spec.contains(version_b, prereleases=True), ( | |
| f">{specifier_version} accepts {version_a} " | |
| f"but rejects {version_b} even though " | |
| f"{version_b} > {version_a}" | |
| ) | |
| def test_less_than_monotonic( | |
| self, | |
| specifier_version: Version, | |
| version_a: Version, | |
| version_b: Version, | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """If a matches <V and b < a, then b must also match <V.""" | |
| spec = Specifier(f"<{specifier_version}") | |
| if spec.contains(version_a, prereleases=True) and version_b < version_a: | |
| assert spec.contains(version_b, prereleases=True), ( | |
| f"<{specifier_version} accepts {version_a} " | |
| f"but rejects {version_b} even though " | |
| f"{version_b} < {version_a}" | |
| ) | |
| def test_less_than_monotonic_related( | |
| self, triple: tuple[Version, Version, Version] | |
| ) -> None: | |
| """If a matches <V and b < a, then b must also match <V. | |
| Same property as above but with versions sharing a release segment.""" | |
| specifier_version, version_a, version_b = triple | |
| spec = Specifier(f"<{specifier_version}") | |
| if spec.contains(version_a, prereleases=True) and version_b < version_a: | |
| assert spec.contains(version_b, prereleases=True), ( | |
| f"<{specifier_version} accepts {version_a} " | |
| f"but rejects {version_b} even though " | |
| f"{version_b} < {version_a}" | |
| ) | |