AdithyaSK's picture
AdithyaSK HF Staff
Publish 100 swe_next Harbor tasks
d40299b verified
Raw History Blame Contribute Delete
30.9 kB
# This file is dual licensed under the terms of the Apache License, Version
# 2.0, and the BSD License. See the LICENSE file in the root of this repository
# for complete details.
from __future__ import annotations
import pytest
from hypothesis import assume, given
from hypothesis import strategies as st
from packaging.specifiers import Specifier, SpecifierSet
from packaging.version import Version
from tests.property.strategies import (
SETTINGS,
local_labels,
nonlocal_versions,
pep440_versions,
pre_tags,
related_version_triple,
release_versions,
small_ints,
specifier_sets,
)
pytestmark = pytest.mark.property
class TestFilterContainmentConsistency:
"""Implied by the definitions of filter() and contains(): filtering a list
of versions should produce exactly the versions that individually satisfy
the specifier."""
@given(
spec=specifier_sets(),
versions=st.lists(pep440_versions(), min_size=0, max_size=15),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_filter_equals_manual_containment(
self, spec: SpecifierSet, versions: list[Version]
) -> None:
"""filter(vs) should equal [v for v in vs if v in spec]."""
strs = [str(v) for v in versions]
filtered = list(spec.filter(strs, prereleases=True))
manual = [s for s in strs if spec.contains(s, prereleases=True)]
assert filtered == manual
@given(
spec=specifier_sets(),
versions=st.lists(pep440_versions(), min_size=0, max_size=15),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_filter_preserves_order(
self, spec: SpecifierSet, versions: list[Version]
) -> None:
"""filter() must return versions in the same order as the input."""
strs = [str(v) for v in versions]
filtered = list(spec.filter(strs, prereleases=True))
# The filtered list must be a subsequence of the input.
it = iter(strs)
for f in filtered:
for s in it:
if s == f:
break
else:
raise AssertionError(f"{f} not found in remaining input")
@given(
spec=specifier_sets(),
versions=st.lists(pep440_versions(), min_size=0, max_size=15),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_filter_is_subset_of_input(
self, spec: SpecifierSet, versions: list[Version]
) -> None:
"""Every version in filter output was in the input."""
strs = [str(v) for v in versions]
filtered = list(spec.filter(strs, prereleases=True))
for v in filtered:
assert v in strs
class TestSpecifierSetAndConsistency:
"""Implied by the definition of SpecifierSet.__and__: the & operator
combines two specifier sets, and the result should match a version iff
both operands match it."""
@given(
specifier_a=specifier_sets(),
specifier_b=specifier_sets(),
version=pep440_versions(),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_and_matches_iff_both_match(
self,
specifier_a: SpecifierSet,
specifier_b: SpecifierSet,
version: Version,
) -> None:
"""(a & b).contains(v) iff a.contains(v) and b.contains(v)."""
combined = specifier_a & specifier_b
both = specifier_a.contains(version, prereleases=True) and specifier_b.contains(
version, prereleases=True
)
assert combined.contains(version, prereleases=True) == both
@given(
specifier_a=specifier_sets(),
specifier_b=specifier_sets(),
version=pep440_versions(),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_and_is_commutative(
self,
specifier_a: SpecifierSet,
specifier_b: SpecifierSet,
version: Version,
) -> None:
"""a & b and b & a accept the same versions."""
ab = specifier_a & specifier_b
b_and_a = specifier_b & specifier_a
assert ab.contains(version, prereleases=True) == b_and_a.contains(
version, prereleases=True
)
class TestSpecifierRoundTrip:
"""Implied by the normalization rules: parsing a specifier and converting
it back to a string should produce a stable, equivalent representation."""
@given(version=nonlocal_versions())
@SETTINGS
def test_specifier_str_round_trip(self, version: Version) -> None:
"""Specifier(str(Specifier(s))) == Specifier(s)."""
for op in [">=", "<=", ">", "<", "==", "!="]:
s = f"{op}{version}"
assert Specifier(str(Specifier(s))) == Specifier(s)
@given(version=nonlocal_versions())
@SETTINGS
def test_specifier_set_str_round_trip(self, version: Version) -> None:
"""SpecifierSet(str(SpecifierSet(s))) == SpecifierSet(s)."""
s = f">={version},<={version}"
assert SpecifierSet(str(SpecifierSet(s))) == SpecifierSet(s)
@given(spec=specifier_sets())
@SETTINGS
def test_specifier_set_str_round_trip_general(self, spec: SpecifierSet) -> None:
"""Any SpecifierSet round-trips through str."""
assert SpecifierSet(str(spec)) == spec
class TestVersionPropertyConsistency:
"""Implied by the version scheme: the .public, .base_version, .major,
.minor, .micro properties must be consistent with the parsed version
components."""
@given(version=pep440_versions())
@SETTINGS
def test_public_strips_local(self, version: Version) -> None:
"""Version(v.public) equals v with local removed."""
pub = Version(version.public)
assert pub == version.__replace__(local=None)
@given(version=pep440_versions())
@SETTINGS
def test_base_version_strips_suffixes(self, version: Version) -> None:
"""Version(v.base_version) has no pre/post/dev/local."""
base = Version(version.base_version)
assert base.pre is None
assert base.post is None
assert base.dev is None
assert base.local is None
assert base.release == version.release
assert base.epoch == version.epoch
@given(version=pep440_versions())
@SETTINGS
def test_major_minor_micro_agree_with_release(self, version: Version) -> None:
"""major/minor/micro are the first three release components."""
assert version.major == version.release[0]
assert version.minor == (version.release[1] if len(version.release) > 1 else 0)
assert version.micro == (version.release[2] if len(version.release) > 2 else 0)
@given(version=pep440_versions())
@SETTINGS
def test_is_prerelease_iff_pre_or_dev(self, version: Version) -> None:
"""is_prerelease is True iff pre or dev is set."""
assert version.is_prerelease == (
version.pre is not None or version.dev is not None
)
@given(version=pep440_versions())
@SETTINGS
def test_is_postrelease_iff_post(self, version: Version) -> None:
"""is_postrelease is True iff post is set."""
assert version.is_postrelease == (version.post is not None)
@given(version=pep440_versions())
@SETTINGS
def test_is_devrelease_iff_dev(self, version: Version) -> None:
"""is_devrelease is True iff dev is set."""
assert version.is_devrelease == (version.dev is not None)
@given(version=pep440_versions())
@SETTINGS
def test_public_version_ordering(self, version: Version) -> None:
"""A version with local is >= its public version."""
pub = Version(version.public)
assert version >= pub
class TestMetamorphicVersionModifications:
"""Implied by the ordering rules: known modifications to a version
should produce predictable ordering changes."""
@given(version=release_versions())
@SETTINGS
def test_adding_post_increases(self, version: Version) -> None:
"""V.postN > V for any final release V."""
post = Version(f"{version}.post0")
assert post > version
@given(version=release_versions())
@SETTINGS
def test_adding_dev_decreases(self, version: Version) -> None:
"""V.devN < V for any final release V."""
dev = Version(f"{version}.dev0")
assert dev < version
@given(version=release_versions(), tag=pre_tags, number=small_ints)
@SETTINGS
def test_adding_pre_decreases(
self, version: Version, tag: str, number: int
) -> None:
"""V.aN/bN/rcN < V for any final release V."""
pre = Version(f"{version}{tag}{number}")
assert pre < version
@given(version=pep440_versions())
@SETTINGS
def test_bumping_last_segment_increases(self, version: Version) -> None:
"""Incrementing the last release segment produces a greater version."""
release = list(version.release)
release[-1] += 1
bumped_str = ".".join(str(s) for s in release)
if version.epoch:
bumped_str = f"{version.epoch}!{bumped_str}"
bumped = Version(bumped_str)
assert bumped > version
@given(
version=pep440_versions(),
higher_epoch=st.integers(min_value=1, max_value=5),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_higher_epoch_always_wins(
self, version: Version, higher_epoch: int
) -> None:
"""A version with a higher epoch is always greater."""
epoch = version.epoch + higher_epoch
other = Version(f"{epoch}!0")
assert other > version
@given(version=release_versions())
@SETTINGS
def test_appending_zero_segment_is_equal(self, version: Version) -> None:
"""V.0 == V due to zero-padding rules."""
extended = Version(f"{version}.0")
assert extended == version
@given(
version=nonlocal_versions(),
local=local_labels,
)
@SETTINGS
def test_adding_local_does_not_decrease(self, version: Version, local: str) -> None:
"""V+local >= V for any version."""
with_local = Version(f"{version}+{local}")
assert with_local >= version
class TestCompatibleReleaseBounds:
"""Implied by the compatible release definition: ~=V.N is equivalent
to >=V.N, ==V.*, which means it has a clear lower and upper bound."""
@given(version=release_versions(), candidate=pep440_versions())
@SETTINGS
def test_compatible_lower_bound(self, version: Version, candidate: Version) -> None:
"""If candidate matches ~=V then candidate >= V."""
assume(candidate.local is None and len(version.release) >= 2)
spec = Specifier(f"~={version}")
if spec.contains(candidate, prereleases=True):
assert candidate >= version
@given(version=release_versions(), candidate=pep440_versions())
@SETTINGS
def test_compatible_upper_bound(self, version: Version, candidate: Version) -> None:
"""If candidate matches ~=V.N then candidate < (V_prefix+1).0."""
assume(candidate.local is None and len(version.release) >= 2)
spec = Specifier(f"~={version}")
if spec.contains(candidate, prereleases=True):
# Build the upper bound: bump the second-to-last segment.
prefix = list(version.release[:-1])
prefix[-1] += 1
upper = Version(".".join(str(s) for s in prefix))
if version.epoch:
upper = Version(f"{version.epoch}!{upper}")
assert candidate < upper
@given(version=release_versions(), candidate=pep440_versions())
@SETTINGS
def test_compatible_matches_iff_expansion_matches(
self, version: Version, candidate: Version
) -> None:
"""~=V.N matches iff >=V.N, ==V.* both match."""
assume(candidate.local is None and len(version.release) >= 2)
tilde = Specifier(f"~={version}")
# Build the expansion: >=V, ==prefix.*
prefix = ".".join(str(s) for s in version.release[:-1])
if version.epoch:
prefix = f"{version.epoch}!{prefix}"
expanded = SpecifierSet(f">={version},=={prefix}.*")
assert tilde.contains(candidate, prereleases=True) == expanded.contains(
candidate, prereleases=True
)
class TestTrichotomy:
"""Implied by the version ordering being a total order and the specifier
definitions. The inclusive operators (>=, <=) have no exclusion rules
and together with == form a true trichotomy. The exclusive operators
(>, <) have pre/post/local exclusions so they are subsets of the
inclusive operators."""
@given(
candidate=pep440_versions(),
specifier_version=nonlocal_versions(),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_inclusive_trichotomy(
self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version
) -> None:
"""Exactly one of <=S (and not ==S), ==S, >=S (and not ==S) holds.
Equivalently: >=S and <=S partition the version space into three
disjoint groups (less, equal, greater) with ==S being the middle."""
less_equal = Specifier(f"<={specifier_version}").contains(
candidate, prereleases=True
)
equal = Specifier(f"=={specifier_version}").contains(
candidate, prereleases=True
)
greater_equal = Specifier(f">={specifier_version}").contains(
candidate, prereleases=True
)
# If equal, both inclusive ops match.
if equal:
assert less_equal
assert greater_equal
else:
# Exactly one of <=S or >=S matches (not both, since == is
# excluded, and at least one must hold by totality).
assert less_equal != greater_equal, (
f"candidate={candidate}, spec={specifier_version}: "
f"<={less_equal}, =={equal}, >={greater_equal}"
)
@given(
candidate=pep440_versions(),
specifier_version=nonlocal_versions(),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_greater_equal_equals_greater_than_or_equal(
self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version
) -> None:
""">=S matches iff >S or ==S matches.
This may fail for pre/post/local-excluded versions (where >S
rejects a version that is strictly greater in ordering). When
it does, it reveals the exclusion gaps in > and <."""
greater_equal = Specifier(f">={specifier_version}").contains(
candidate, prereleases=True
)
greater_than = Specifier(f">{specifier_version}").contains(
candidate, prereleases=True
)
equal = Specifier(f"=={specifier_version}").contains(
candidate, prereleases=True
)
# >V is a subset of >=V, and ==V is a subset of >=V, so
# (greater_than or equal) implies greater_equal. The reverse also
# holds: >=V matches only if the candidate is either strictly greater
# or equal, and the exclusions in >V only reduce its set.
if greater_than or equal:
assert greater_equal
# The converse (greater_equal implies greater_than or equal) can fail
# when >V excludes a post/pre/local of V. That gap is tested by the
# cross-operator consistency tests elsewhere.
@given(
candidate=pep440_versions(),
specifier_version=nonlocal_versions(),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_less_equal_equals_less_than_or_equal(
self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version
) -> None:
"""<=S matches iff <S or ==S matches (same caveat as above)."""
less_equal = Specifier(f"<={specifier_version}").contains(
candidate, prereleases=True
)
less_than = Specifier(f"<{specifier_version}").contains(
candidate, prereleases=True
)
equal = Specifier(f"=={specifier_version}").contains(
candidate, prereleases=True
)
if less_than or equal:
assert less_equal
class TestZeroPaddingSpecifierInvariance:
"""Implied by the zero-padding rules: if V == V.0 as versions, then
every specifier must treat them identically."""
@given(version=release_versions(), candidate=pep440_versions())
@SETTINGS
def test_zero_padded_candidate_matches_same_specifiers(
self, version: Version, candidate: Version
) -> None:
"""spec.contains(V) == spec.contains(V.0) for all specifiers."""
padded = candidate.__replace__(release=(*candidate.release, 0))
for op in [">=", "<=", ">", "<", "==", "!="]:
spec = Specifier(f"{op}{version}")
assert spec.contains(candidate, prereleases=True) == spec.contains(
padded, prereleases=True
), f"{op}{version}: {candidate} and {padded} disagree"
class TestPrereleaseFlagOnlyAffectsPreReleases:
"""Implied by the pre-release handling rules: the prereleases flag
should only affect versions that are actually pre-releases."""
@given(spec=specifier_sets(), version=pep440_versions())
@SETTINGS
def test_non_prerelease_unaffected_by_flag(
self, spec: SpecifierSet, version: Version
) -> None:
"""For non-prerelease versions, prereleases flag has no effect."""
assume(not version.is_prerelease and version.local is None)
assert spec.contains(version, prereleases=True) == spec.contains(
version, prereleases=False
)
class TestAndAgreesWithStringConcatenation:
"""Implied by SpecifierSet.__and__ semantics: the & operator should
produce the same containment results as comma-joining the specifier
strings."""
@given(
specifier_a=specifier_sets(),
specifier_b=specifier_sets(),
version=pep440_versions(),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_and_equals_comma_join(
self,
specifier_a: SpecifierSet,
specifier_b: SpecifierSet,
version: Version,
) -> None:
"""(a & b).contains(v) == SpecifierSet(f"{a},{b}").contains(v)."""
via_and = (specifier_a & specifier_b).contains(version, prereleases=True)
joined = str(specifier_a) + ("," + str(specifier_b) if str(specifier_b) else "")
via_str = SpecifierSet(joined).contains(version, prereleases=True)
assert via_and == via_str
class TestLocalInvarianceForOrderingSpecifiers:
"""Implied by the spec: local version labels MUST be ignored entirely
when checking if candidate versions match a given version specifier
(except == with a local label)."""
@given(
version=nonlocal_versions(),
specifier_version=nonlocal_versions(),
local=local_labels,
)
@SETTINGS
def test_local_ignored_for_all_ordering_ops(
self, version: Version, specifier_version: Version, local: str
) -> None:
"""Adding local to a candidate doesn't change ordering specifier
results."""
with_local = Version(f"{version}+{local}")
for op in [">=", "<=", ">", "<", "~="]:
if op == "~=" and len(specifier_version.release) < 2:
continue
spec = Specifier(f"{op}{specifier_version}")
assert spec.contains(version, prereleases=True) == spec.contains(
with_local, prereleases=True
), f"{op}{specifier_version}: {version} and {with_local} disagree"
class TestComplementFilterPartition:
"""Implied by != being the exact complement of ==: filtering with
== and != should partition the input list exactly."""
@given(
specifier_version=nonlocal_versions(),
versions=st.lists(pep440_versions(), min_size=0, max_size=15),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_equal_not_equal_partition_versions(
self, specifier_version: Version, versions: list[Version]
) -> None:
"""filter(==V, vs) + filter(!=V, vs) == vs (as multisets)."""
strs = [str(v) for v in versions if v.local is None]
equal_spec = SpecifierSet(f"=={specifier_version}")
not_equal_spec = SpecifierSet(f"!={specifier_version}")
equal_filtered = list(equal_spec.filter(strs, prereleases=True))
not_equal_filtered = list(not_equal_spec.filter(strs, prereleases=True))
assert sorted(equal_filtered + not_equal_filtered) == sorted(strs)
@given(
specifier_version=release_versions(),
versions=st.lists(pep440_versions(), min_size=0, max_size=15),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_equal_not_equal_wildcard_partition_versions(
self, specifier_version: Version, versions: list[Version]
) -> None:
"""filter(==V.*, vs) + filter(!=V.*, vs) == vs (as multisets)."""
strs = [str(v) for v in versions if v.local is None]
equal_spec = SpecifierSet(f"=={specifier_version}.*")
not_equal_spec = SpecifierSet(f"!={specifier_version}.*")
equal_filtered = list(equal_spec.filter(strs, prereleases=True))
not_equal_filtered = list(not_equal_spec.filter(strs, prereleases=True))
assert sorted(equal_filtered + not_equal_filtered) == sorted(strs)
class TestCrossOperatorConsistency:
"""Implied by the combination of the inclusive and exclusive ordered
comparison sections, plus the version matching and exclusion sections.
The six comparison operators (>=, <=, >, <, ==, !=) are defined
independently but their semantics must be consistent with each other
and with the version ordering."""
@given(
candidate=nonlocal_versions(),
specifier_version=nonlocal_versions(),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_greater_than_is_subset_of_greater_equal(
self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version
) -> None:
"""If v matches >V then v must also match >=V."""
greater_than = Specifier(f">{specifier_version}")
greater_equal = Specifier(f">={specifier_version}")
if greater_than.contains(candidate, prereleases=True):
assert greater_equal.contains(candidate, prereleases=True), (
f">{specifier_version} accepts {candidate} "
f"but >={specifier_version} rejects it"
)
@given(
candidate=nonlocal_versions(),
specifier_version=nonlocal_versions(),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_less_than_is_subset_of_less_equal(
self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version
) -> None:
"""If v matches <V then v must also match <=V."""
less_than = Specifier(f"<{specifier_version}")
less_equal = Specifier(f"<={specifier_version}")
if less_than.contains(candidate, prereleases=True):
assert less_equal.contains(candidate, prereleases=True), (
f"<{specifier_version} accepts {candidate} "
f"but <={specifier_version} rejects it"
)
@given(
candidate=nonlocal_versions(),
specifier_version=nonlocal_versions(),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_greater_than_and_less_than_are_disjoint(
self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version
) -> None:
"""No version can match both >V and <V."""
greater_than = Specifier(f">{specifier_version}")
less_than = Specifier(f"<{specifier_version}")
assert not (
greater_than.contains(candidate, prereleases=True)
and less_than.contains(candidate, prereleases=True)
), f"{candidate} matches both >{specifier_version} and <{specifier_version}"
@given(
candidate=nonlocal_versions(),
specifier_version=nonlocal_versions(),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_greater_equal_and_less_equal_intersection_implies_equal(
self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version
) -> None:
"""If v matches both >=V and <=V then v must match ==V."""
greater_equal = Specifier(f">={specifier_version}")
less_equal = Specifier(f"<={specifier_version}")
equal = Specifier(f"=={specifier_version}")
if greater_equal.contains(candidate, prereleases=True) and less_equal.contains(
candidate, prereleases=True
):
assert equal.contains(candidate, prereleases=True), (
f"{candidate} matches >={specifier_version} and "
f"<={specifier_version} but not =={specifier_version}"
)
@given(
candidate=nonlocal_versions(),
specifier_version=nonlocal_versions(),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_not_equal_accepts_everything_greater_than_accepts(
self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version
) -> None:
"""If v matches >V then v must also match !=V."""
greater_than = Specifier(f">{specifier_version}")
not_equal = Specifier(f"!={specifier_version}")
if greater_than.contains(candidate, prereleases=True):
assert not_equal.contains(candidate, prereleases=True), (
f">{specifier_version} accepts {candidate} "
f"but !={specifier_version} rejects it"
)
@given(
candidate=nonlocal_versions(),
specifier_version=nonlocal_versions(),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_not_equal_accepts_everything_less_than_accepts(
self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version
) -> None:
"""If v matches <V then v must also match !=V."""
less_than = Specifier(f"<{specifier_version}")
not_equal = Specifier(f"!={specifier_version}")
if less_than.contains(candidate, prereleases=True):
assert not_equal.contains(candidate, prereleases=True), (
f"<{specifier_version} accepts {candidate} "
f"but !={specifier_version} rejects it"
)
@given(
specifier_version=nonlocal_versions(),
version_a=nonlocal_versions(),
version_b=nonlocal_versions(),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_greater_equal_monotonic(
self, specifier_version: Version, version_a: Version, version_b: Version
) -> None:
"""If a matches >=V and b >= a, then b must also match >=V."""
spec = Specifier(f">={specifier_version}")
if spec.contains(version_a, prereleases=True) and version_b >= version_a:
assert spec.contains(version_b, prereleases=True), (
f">={specifier_version} accepts {version_a} but rejects "
f"{version_b} even though {version_b} >= {version_a}"
)
@given(
specifier_version=nonlocal_versions(),
version_a=nonlocal_versions(),
version_b=nonlocal_versions(),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_less_equal_monotonic(
self, specifier_version: Version, version_a: Version, version_b: Version
) -> None:
"""If a matches <=V and b <= a, then b must also match <=V."""
spec = Specifier(f"<={specifier_version}")
if spec.contains(version_a, prereleases=True) and version_b <= version_a:
assert spec.contains(version_b, prereleases=True), (
f"<={specifier_version} accepts {version_a} but rejects "
f"{version_b} even though {version_b} <= {version_a}"
)
@given(
candidate=nonlocal_versions(),
specifier_version=nonlocal_versions(),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_equal_wildcard_is_superset_of_equal(
self, candidate: Version, specifier_version: Version
) -> None:
"""If v matches ==V then v must also match ==V.*."""
# Wildcards are only valid on pure release segments.
assume(
not specifier_version.is_devrelease
and not specifier_version.is_prerelease
and not specifier_version.is_postrelease
)
equal = Specifier(f"=={specifier_version}")
equal_wild = Specifier(f"=={specifier_version}.*")
if equal.contains(candidate, prereleases=True):
assert equal_wild.contains(candidate, prereleases=True), (
f"=={specifier_version} accepts {candidate} "
f"but =={specifier_version}.* rejects it"
)
@given(
specifier_version=nonlocal_versions(),
version_a=nonlocal_versions(),
version_b=nonlocal_versions(),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_greater_than_monotonic(
self,
specifier_version: Version,
version_a: Version,
version_b: Version,
) -> None:
"""If a matches >V and b > a, then b must also match >V."""
spec = Specifier(f">{specifier_version}")
if spec.contains(version_a, prereleases=True) and version_b > version_a:
assert spec.contains(version_b, prereleases=True), (
f">{specifier_version} accepts {version_a} "
f"but rejects {version_b} even though "
f"{version_b} > {version_a}"
)
@given(triple=related_version_triple())
@SETTINGS
def test_greater_than_monotonic_related(
self, triple: tuple[Version, Version, Version]
) -> None:
"""If a matches >V and b > a, then b must also match >V.
Same property as above but with versions sharing a release segment."""
specifier_version, version_a, version_b = triple
spec = Specifier(f">{specifier_version}")
if spec.contains(version_a, prereleases=True) and version_b > version_a:
assert spec.contains(version_b, prereleases=True), (
f">{specifier_version} accepts {version_a} "
f"but rejects {version_b} even though "
f"{version_b} > {version_a}"
)
@given(
specifier_version=nonlocal_versions(),
version_a=nonlocal_versions(),
version_b=nonlocal_versions(),
)
@SETTINGS
def test_less_than_monotonic(
self,
specifier_version: Version,
version_a: Version,
version_b: Version,
) -> None:
"""If a matches <V and b < a, then b must also match <V."""
spec = Specifier(f"<{specifier_version}")
if spec.contains(version_a, prereleases=True) and version_b < version_a:
assert spec.contains(version_b, prereleases=True), (
f"<{specifier_version} accepts {version_a} "
f"but rejects {version_b} even though "
f"{version_b} < {version_a}"
)
@given(triple=related_version_triple())
@SETTINGS
def test_less_than_monotonic_related(
self, triple: tuple[Version, Version, Version]
) -> None:
"""If a matches <V and b < a, then b must also match <V.
Same property as above but with versions sharing a release segment."""
specifier_version, version_a, version_b = triple
spec = Specifier(f"<{specifier_version}")
if spec.contains(version_a, prereleases=True) and version_b < version_a:
assert spec.contains(version_b, prereleases=True), (
f"<{specifier_version} accepts {version_a} "
f"but rejects {version_b} even though "
f"{version_b} < {version_a}"
)