Datasets:
Download README.md from Macrostack/macrostack-open-alternatives: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 4.02 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/Macrostack/macrostack-open-alternatives/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/Macrostack/macrostack-open-alternatives/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/Macrostack/macrostack-open-alternatives/resolve/main/README.md
license: cc-by-4.0
language:
- en
pretty_name: Macrostack Open Alternatives
size_categories:
- n<1K
task_categories:
- tabular-classification
tags:
- open-source
- self-hosting
- software-alternatives
- cloud
- licensing
- vendor-lock-in
configs:
- config_name: default
data_files:
- split: train
path: data/alternatives.csv
Macrostack Open Alternatives
387 verified open-source and self-hostable alternatives to 85 proprietary products, across 78 categories and the five layers of the AI and cloud stack.
Maintained at macrostack.net. Data version 2026-09-05.
What makes this different from a listicle
Every licence is read from the project's own LICENSE file rather than from a
marketing page. That sounds like a small distinction and it is not: vendors
routinely describe source-available and business-source licences as "open
source", and a dataset that repeats the marketing is worse than no dataset.
Each row also carries what a person actually needs in order to decide:
self_hostable— can you run it yourself at alllocal_first— does it work with no networkpricing— the shape of the cost, not a number that rotssovereignty_score— a transparent 0–100 score for how much control you keepstack_layer— where it sits, L1 chips through L5 applications
Of 387 entries, 295 are open source and 311 are self-hostable.
Columns
| Column | Meaning |
|---|---|
alternative |
The open or self-hostable option |
replaces |
The proprietary product it is an alternative to |
vendor_replaced |
Who sells that product |
category, category_slug |
The decision category |
stack_layer, stack_layer_name |
L1 chips → L5 applications |
license |
SPDX identifier, read from the project's own LICENSE |
open_source |
True only for an OSI-approved licence |
self_hostable |
Can be run on your own infrastructure |
local_first |
Works without a network connection |
sovereignty_score |
0–100, how much control you retain |
recommended |
Our pick in that category |
pricing |
free · freemium · paid · usage |
kind |
software · service · hardware |
website, repo, docs |
Canonical links |
last_verified |
When a human last checked the row |
source_page |
The page on macrostack.net this row is rendered on |
Use it
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("Macrostack/macrostack-open-alternatives", split="train")
# Self-hostable options that are genuinely open source
open_selfhost = ds.filter(lambda r: r["open_source"] and r["self_hostable"])
print(len(open_selfhost))
Straight from the source, always current:
curl -sL https://www.macrostack.net/data/macrostack-alternatives.csv
Licence and attribution
CC-BY-4.0. You may use this commercially. Attribution is a condition of the licence, and it must include a link:
Data from Macrostack — CC-BY-4.0
Method and limits
The full method is at https://www.macrostack.net/methodology.
Worth stating plainly:
sovereignty_scoreis our judgement, not a measurement. The inputs are documented; the weighting is a considered opinion and you may disagree with it.recommendedis a single pick per category and never reflects a commercial relationship. Several top-ranked entries here have no affiliate programme at all, which is the point.pricingis a shape, not a price. Real prices change faster than any dataset can track, so we record the model instead.- Coverage is deliberately narrow. Infrastructure, developer tooling, AI and business software. Not consumer apps, not games.
Corrections are welcome — every row links to the page it came from.