| { |
| "card_set": { |
| "date": null, |
| "label": "Evidence | Guertin Targeted", |
| "case": "27-CR-23-1886", |
| "case_title": "State v. Matthew D. Guertin", |
| "jurisdiction": "Minnesota Fourth Judicial District", |
| "judge": null, |
| "type": "findings", |
| "description": "Case 27-CR-23-1886: 200 filings, 14 judicial officers, 6 competency evaluations, 1,139+ days open, zero dispositions. The sole defendant with case activity in 2025. 99th-100th percentile on every measurable axis. The case that was never supposed to produce a forensic database.", |
| "source_doc": "MCRO Forensic Reports: Guertin Case Update, Cole-Prochazka Inversion Report, Discovery Fraud Evidence Chain, Narrative Arc Report", |
| "participants": [], |
| "card_count": 13, |
| "curator": "Claude" |
| }, |
| "cards": [ |
| { |
| "id": "guertin-targeted-001", |
| "seq": 1, |
| "type": "text", |
| "speaker_id": "other", |
| "speaker": "CASE OVERVIEW", |
| "speakers": ["other"], |
| "full_text": "CASE 27-CR-23-1886: State of Minnesota v. Matthew David Guertin\n\n- 200 filings across 31 distinct filing types\n- 14 judicial officers\n- 6 competency evaluation cycles\n- 1,139+ days open\n- Zero dispositions\n- The only defendant in the MCRO corpus with case activity in 2025\n\nGuertin holds US Patent 11,577,177 B2 (26 claims) for InfiniSet — a rotating treadmill virtual production system. Netflix's patent (US 11,810,254 B2) cites his at the top of 'References Cited.' He was arrested 24 days before his patent was granted.", |
| "page": null, |
| "source_url": null, |
| "evidence_links": [ |
| { |
| "label": "All 200 Guertin Case Filings", |
| "url": "/source-files/#children?case_id=27-CR-23-1886&mode=split&title=27-CR-23-1886+—+200+Filings+Zero+Dispositions+1139+Days", |
| "view": "children" |
| } |
| ] |
| }, |
| { |
| "id": "guertin-targeted-002", |
| "seq": 2, |
| "type": "text", |
| "speaker_id": "other", |
| "speaker": "FORENSIC FINDING", |
| "speakers": ["other"], |
| "full_text": "THE PATENT TIMELINE\n\n- March 19, 2021: Guertin files provisional patent 63/163,135\n- March 31, 2021: Scanline VFX president files near-identical patent — 12 days later\n- November 2021: Netflix acquires Scanline for ~$100 million\n- January 21, 2023: Guertin arrested — 24 days before patent grant\n- February 14, 2023: US Patent 11,577,177 B2 granted (26 claims)\n- November 7, 2023: Netflix patent granted — Guertin's listed at top of References Cited\n\nThe man whose patent sits atop Netflix's References Cited was arrested, evaluated for competency three times, and told his claims were delusional — without anyone checking the public patent database.", |
| "page": null, |
| "source_url": null, |
| "evidence_links": [ |
| { |
| "label": "Guertin Case Filings", |
| "url": "/source-files/#children?case_id=27-CR-23-1886&mode=split&title=27-CR-23-1886+—+Patent+Holder+Declared+Incompetent", |
| "view": "children" |
| } |
| ] |
| }, |
| { |
| "id": "guertin-targeted-003", |
| "seq": 3, |
| "type": "text", |
| "speaker_id": "other", |
| "speaker": "FORENSIC FINDING", |
| "speakers": ["other"], |
| "full_text": "THREE EVALUATORS, ONE DIAGNOSIS, ZERO VERIFICATION\n\n1. Dr. Rogstad (Mar 2023): In-person, ~2 hours. Diagnosed 'Unspecified Schizophrenia Spectrum.' Acknowledged 'limits of my expertise in relation to technology matters.' Never verified the patent.\n\n2. Dr. Milz (Jan 2024): Zoom, ~2 hours. Secretly recorded. Fabricated substance use history contradicted by the transcript. Never verified the patent.\n\n3. Dr. Cranbrook (Dec 2024): ZERO clinical contact. Supervisor of both prior evaluators. Diagnosis 'maintained based upon record review.' Report metadata shows author 'Hines, Anne' — not Cranbrook.\n\nOf 37 claims classified as delusional across all three evaluations, 21 (56.8%) are independently verified true. Zero are affirmatively contradicted.", |
| "page": null, |
| "source_url": null, |
| "evidence_links": [ |
| { |
| "label": "5 Rule 20 Evaluation Orders", |
| "url": "/source-files/#children?case_id=27-CR-23-1886&filing_type=Order-Evaluation+for+Competency+to+Proceed+(Rule+20.01)&mode=split&title=5+Rule+20+Orders+—+6+Evaluation+Cycles+for+One+Defendant", |
| "view": "children" |
| } |
| ] |
| }, |
| { |
| "id": "guertin-targeted-004", |
| "seq": 4, |
| "type": "text", |
| "speaker_id": "other", |
| "speaker": "FORENSIC FINDING", |
| "speakers": ["other"], |
| "full_text": "10 ESOLUTIONS-SIGNED DOCUMENTS — #1 RANKED\n\nGuertin's case contains 8-10 documents signed with eSolutions digital signatures — the highest count of any defendant in the corpus. This is 4.4x the corpus mean, placing him at the 95.7th percentile.\n\nHe is the ONLY defendant with an eSolutions-signed document in 2025.\n\neSolutions signatures show a 86.5% null cryptographic validation rate across the corpus, and 100% of them have edits after the digital signature was applied.", |
| "page": null, |
| "source_url": null, |
| "evidence_links": [ |
| { |
| "label": "Guertin eSolutions Documents", |
| "url": "/source-files/#children?case_id=27-CR-23-1886&doc_set=META_ESolutions-Signature&mode=split&title=Guertin+—+8+eSolutions+Docs+4.4x+Corpus+Mean+95.7th+Percentile", |
| "view": "children" |
| }, |
| { |
| "label": "All 134 eSolutions Documents", |
| "url": "/source-files/#children?doc_set=META_ESolutions-Signature&mode=split&title=134+eSolutions+Signatures+—+Guertin+Ranked+%231", |
| "view": "children" |
| } |
| ] |
| }, |
| { |
| "id": "guertin-targeted-005", |
| "seq": 5, |
| "type": "text", |
| "speaker_id": "other", |
| "speaker": "FORENSIC FINDING", |
| "speakers": ["other"], |
| "full_text": "THE COLE/PROCHAZKA INVERSION\n\nJudith L. Cole: Hennepin County's highest-volume prosecutor — 878 cases, PDF metadata author on 123 documents across 86 cases. ACTIVE in 52 of 53 dockets where she appears. The ONLY docket where she is INACTIVE: Guertin's case.\n\nThomas Prochazka: Appears in 7 dockets. INACTIVE in 6 of 7. The ONLY docket where he is ACTIVE: Guertin's case.\n\nProbability of this exact inversion occurring by chance: approximately 1 in 99,000.", |
| "page": null, |
| "source_url": null, |
| "evidence_links": [ |
| { |
| "label": "Guertin Case Docket", |
| "url": "/source-files/#parents?case_id=27-CR-23-1886&mode=split&title=27-CR-23-1886+Docket+—+Cole+INACTIVE+Prochazka+ACTIVE+(1+in+99000)", |
| "view": "parents" |
| } |
| ] |
| }, |
| { |
| "id": "guertin-targeted-006", |
| "seq": 6, |
| "type": "text", |
| "speaker_id": "other", |
| "speaker": "FORENSIC FINDING", |
| "speakers": ["other"], |
| "full_text": "THE SECOND INCOMPETENCY FINDING: January 16-17, 2024\n\nGuertin's second incompetency order was created at 8:26:48 AM, signed by Referee Mercurio 31 SECONDS later, and countersigned by Judge Klein at 9:22:46 AM.\n\nThe scheduled hearing was at 1:30 PM — five hours AFTER the order was already signed.\n\nThe order was entered 'administratively' with no hearing, no testimony, and no opportunity to contest. Its XMP title reads: 'Commitment Order (MI, DD)' — a conservatorship template applied to a criminal competency document.", |
| "page": null, |
| "source_url": null, |
| "evidence_links": [ |
| { |
| "label": "2 Guertin Incompetency Orders", |
| "url": "/source-files/#children?case_id=27-CR-23-1886&filing_type=Finding+of+Incompetency+and+Order&mode=split&title=Guertin+—+2+Incompetency+Orders+(Second+Signed+Before+Hearing)", |
| "view": "children" |
| } |
| ] |
| }, |
| { |
| "id": "guertin-targeted-007", |
| "seq": 7, |
| "type": "text", |
| "speaker_id": "other", |
| "speaker": "FORENSIC FINDING", |
| "speakers": ["other"], |
| "full_text": "COMPETENT — THEN OVERRIDDEN IN 26 DAYS\n\nApril 3, 2025: Judge Koch finds Guertin COMPETENT after 40 pages of sworn testimony. Koch's order is the first MSIP-labeled document in the entire 4,251-document corpus.\n\nApril 29, 2025: Judge Hudleston — on her FIRST appearance on the case — overrides Koch and orders a 4th evaluation. She calls Guertin's Motion to Dismiss 'compelling in many regards' and states he surpasses '99.9% of the population' in intelligence. Then orders another evaluation.\n\n26 days. The shortest different-judge competency override in the corpus (next: 57 days; median: 539 days).", |
| "page": null, |
| "source_url": null, |
| "evidence_links": [ |
| { |
| "label": "Koch Competency Order (Apr 3)", |
| "url": "/source-files/#children?doc_sha256=6e296082826a09d26ebdab4d5d068616f1b3cca5a2a5f02a075ab4d99f6702e1&pdfpage=1", |
| "view": "children" |
| }, |
| { |
| "label": "All Guertin Filings", |
| "url": "/source-files/#children?case_id=27-CR-23-1886&mode=split&title=27-CR-23-1886+—+Competent+Apr+3+Overridden+Apr+29", |
| "view": "children" |
| } |
| ] |
| }, |
| { |
| "id": "guertin-targeted-008", |
| "seq": 8, |
| "type": "text", |
| "speaker_id": "other", |
| "speaker": "FORENSIC FINDING", |
| "speakers": ["other"], |
| "full_text": "APRIL 28, 2025: THE LARGEST SINGLE-DAY FILING IN THE CORPUS\n\nThe day before the pivotal Hudleston hearing, Guertin filed:\n- 61 documents\n- 50 docket indexes\n- 8,075 pages\n- ~934 MB\n\nThis is 6x the next largest single-day filing by any other case in the entire corpus. Every document was a forensic exhibit — the same evidence you can browse on this website.", |
| "page": null, |
| "source_url": null, |
| "evidence_links": [ |
| { |
| "label": "Guertin Case Filings", |
| "url": "/source-files/#children?case_id=27-CR-23-1886&mode=split&title=27-CR-23-1886+—+8075+Pages+Filed+Apr+28+2025+(6x+Largest+in+Corpus)", |
| "view": "children" |
| } |
| ] |
| }, |
| { |
| "id": "guertin-targeted-009", |
| "seq": 9, |
| "type": "text", |
| "speaker_id": "other", |
| "speaker": "FORENSIC FINDING", |
| "speakers": ["other"], |
| "full_text": "TARGET 4 CONVERGENCE\n\nForensic analysis identifies 4 defendant clusters linked across 8 independent axes — language, eSolutions signatures, XMP metadata contamination, shared judicial officers, tracking fonts, shared hash objects, cross-cluster docket drift, and Cole authorship.\n\n1. Matthew Guertin (Cluster 1570) — focal cluster\n2. Muad Abdulkadir (Cluster 674) — biographical mirroring of Guertin's evaluation\n3. Adrian Wesley (Cluster 290) — XMP title 'Contested Competency for Adrian Wesley' appears on 2 documents in GUERTIN's cluster\n4. Peter Lehmeyer (Cluster 696) — exclusive tracking font bridge to Guertin\n\n89.8% of bridge artifacts chronologically appeared in another cluster BEFORE Guertin's case. Out of C(80,4) = 1,581,580 possible 4-cluster combinations, only this one shows convergence across all 8 axes.", |
| "page": null, |
| "source_url": null, |
| "evidence_links": [ |
| { |
| "label": "Guertin Tagged Documents", |
| "url": "/source-files/#children?doc_set=GUERTIN&mode=split&title=200+Guertin+Documents+—+Target+4+Convergence+Across+8+Forensic+Axes", |
| "view": "children" |
| } |
| ] |
| }, |
| { |
| "id": "guertin-targeted-010", |
| "seq": 10, |
| "type": "text", |
| "speaker_id": "other", |
| "speaker": "FORENSIC FINDING", |
| "speakers": ["other"], |
| "full_text": "THE EXAMINER TABLE: 0.004%\n\nOf 155,357 case event rows in the parents_case_events table, only 6 (0.004%) have the examiner field populated.\n\nAll 6 belong to Guertin's case.\n\nIn a system processing thousands of competency evaluations, only one defendant has any examiner data recorded. The defendant who built a forensic database to prove it.", |
| "page": null, |
| "source_url": null, |
| "evidence_links": [ |
| { |
| "label": "Guertin Case Docket", |
| "url": "/source-files/#parents?case_id=27-CR-23-1886&mode=split&title=27-CR-23-1886+—+Only+Case+with+Examiner+Data+(6+of+155357+Events)", |
| "view": "parents" |
| } |
| ] |
| }, |
| { |
| "id": "guertin-targeted-011", |
| "seq": 11, |
| "type": "text", |
| "speaker_id": "other", |
| "speaker": "FORENSIC FINDING", |
| "speakers": ["other"], |
| "full_text": "LINKEDIN SURVEILLANCE: 4.22 STANDARD DEVIATIONS\n\n597 profile searches on Guertin's dormant, never-promoted LinkedIn account (MattGuertin612) over 3 years. 194 distinct searching entities spanning government, military, intelligence, medical, financial, and media sectors.\n\nPeak: 25 searches in one week — July 20, 2023. That is 4.22 standard deviations above the mean.\n\nJuly 20, 2023 is the exact date the Petition for Judicial Commitment was filed.\n\nAll 99 LinkedIn notification emails are DKIM-verified, dual-signed (linkedin.com 2048-bit + maile.linkedin.com 1024-bit), delivered via single-hop TLS 1.2. Zero indicators of forgery.", |
| "page": null, |
| "source_url": null, |
| "evidence_links": [ |
| { |
| "label": "All 200 Guertin Documents", |
| "url": "/source-files/#children?case_id=27-CR-23-1886&mode=split&title=27-CR-23-1886+—+LinkedIn+Peak+on+Commitment+Petition+Date", |
| "view": "children" |
| } |
| ] |
| }, |
| { |
| "id": "guertin-targeted-012", |
| "seq": 12, |
| "type": "text", |
| "speaker_id": "other", |
| "speaker": "FORENSIC FINDING", |
| "speakers": ["other"], |
| "full_text": "GUERTIN'S CLAIM VERIFICATION RATE\n\nAcross all hearings where claims were testable:\n- Guertin: 0% false-claim rate\n- Prosecutor Hamid: 25% false-claim rate\n- Koch competency hearing (Mar 5, 2025): 47 claims tested, 61.3% verified true, 0% false\n- Motion to Dismiss (Apr 16, 2025): 42 claims, 66.7% verified true, 1 verified false (date imprecision)\n- Emergency Motion (May 7, 2025): 38 claims, 78.9% verified true, 0% false — highest rate of any filing\n\nThe man three evaluators called delusional has a higher factual accuracy rate than the prosecution.", |
| "page": null, |
| "source_url": null, |
| "evidence_links": [ |
| { |
| "label": "Guertin Filings", |
| "url": "/source-files/#children?case_id=27-CR-23-1886&mode=split&title=Guertin+—+0%25+False+Claims+vs+Prosecution+25%25+False", |
| "view": "children" |
| } |
| ] |
| }, |
| { |
| "id": "guertin-targeted-013", |
| "seq": 13, |
| "type": "text", |
| "speaker_id": "other", |
| "speaker": "THE QUESTION", |
| "speakers": ["other"], |
| "full_text": "A patent holder whose invention is cited by Netflix. A defendant who scores at the 99th-100th percentile on every measurable axis in a corpus of 2,903 cases. A man whose claims are 0% false and 56.8% verified — and yet three evaluators called them delusional.\n\nThe highest eSolutions signature count. The only examiner data in 155,357 events. A prosecutor inversion with 1-in-99,000 odds. A competency finding overridden in 26 days. 1,139 days open with zero dispositions.\n\nThis is either the most extraordinary coincidence in Minnesota legal history, or it isn't a coincidence at all.\n\nEvery document is real. Every hash is verifiable. Click through and decide for yourself.", |
| "page": null, |
| "source_url": null, |
| "evidence_links": [ |
| { |
| "label": "All 200 Guertin Documents", |
| "url": "/source-files/#children?case_id=27-CR-23-1886&mode=split&title=27-CR-23-1886+—+The+Case+That+Built+a+Forensic+Database", |
| "view": "children" |
| }, |
| { |
| "label": "Guertin Case Docket (246 Events)", |
| "url": "/source-files/#parents?case_id=27-CR-23-1886&mode=split&title=27-CR-23-1886+Docket+—+246+Events+14+Judges+Zero+Dispositions", |
| "view": "parents" |
| } |
| ] |
| } |
| ] |
| } |
|
|
