{ "hearing": { "date": "2025-11-18", "case": "27-CR-23-1886", "case_title": "State v. Matthew D. Guertin", "jurisdiction": "Minnesota Fourth Judicial District", "participants": [ { "name": "Matthew Guertin", "role": "defendant" }, { "name": "Raissa Carpenter", "role": "public defender" } ], "clip_count": 50, "description": "Attorney-client meeting between Matthew Guertin and public defender Raissa Carpenter discussing competency proceedings, discovery fraud allegations, and digital forensic findings in MCRO court documents." }, "clips": { "001": { "file": "001__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 26.304, "segment_count": 2, "full_text": "Can you hear me and see me let me see if I can get my camera going yeah how you doing fine", "transcript": [ { "start": 16.44, "end": 22.44, "text": "Can you hear me and see me let me see if I can get my camera going yeah" }, { "start": 22.44, "end": 24.9, "text": "how you doing fine" } ] }, "002": { "file": "002__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 27.584, "segment_count": 4, "full_text": "Do you want to do um I want to move on with my life and stop having to come to these appointments for the last nearly three years is what I would like to do okay how do we make that happen for you uh by dealing with the fraudulent discovery possibly that normally would get a case dismissed that could be one of those options perhaps or else they won't let us litigate", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 7.92, "text": "Do you want to do um I want to move on with my life and stop having to come to these appointments" }, { "start": 7.92, "end": 13.68, "text": "for the last nearly three years is what I would like to do okay how do we make that happen for" }, { "start": 13.68, "end": 21.52, "text": "you uh by dealing with the fraudulent discovery possibly that normally would get a case dismissed" }, { "start": 21.52, "end": 27.44, "text": "that could be one of those options perhaps or else they won't let us litigate" } ] }, "003": { "file": "003__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 111.104, "segment_count": 20, "full_text": "Any of that stuff while you are incompetent. Yeah, but I was competent and then I was found incompetent for trying to address the discovery fraud. If you don't recall, I have transcripts for the hearing. That was after the March 5th hearing with Judge Koch when I was found competent and then I, that was when we discussed the fraudulent discovery materials in great detail and then Emmett Donnelly at the end of the hearing told the judge that he would like to basically bury them and that nothing more happened with it, which is why I filed my motion to dismiss on January 16th prior to the January 17th hearing that took place for the first time in front of Judge Huddleston the next day, which is when I tried to represent myself after being found competent and I wasn't allowed to do that and my motion wasn't ruled on. So the discovery fraud hasn't been dealt with and then for trying to deal with that, then I was found in, I wasn't even found incompetent. I was ruled to go to another competency evaluation. So, so now you're telling me that in order to deal with the fraudulent discovery, I have to go through this again and go to another psych eval, even though that's what I did and I've been trying to deal with the fraudulent discovery since fucking January of 2020, 2024, January 3rd or January 5th when I filed my first motion for it. So on the record, it's discussed, it's went over in great detail and then also I'm sending you an email right now, which I just sent to you and Emmett, which contains all of the, uh, the fraudulent documents that are, uh, I just got sent, contains all the fraudulent documents that, uh, exist in the record.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 6.2, "text": "Any of that stuff while you are incompetent. Yeah, but I was competent and then I was found incompetent" }, { "start": 6.2, "end": 10.78, "text": "for trying to address the discovery fraud. If you don't recall, I have transcripts for the hearing." }, { "start": 11.38, "end": 17.56, "text": "That was after the March 5th hearing with Judge" }, { "start": 17.56, "end": 23.66, "text": "Koch when I was found competent and then I, that was when we discussed the fraudulent" }, { "start": 23.66, "end": 30.64, "text": "discovery materials in great detail and then Emmett Donnelly at the end of the hearing told" }, { "start": 30.64, "end": 35.98, "text": "the judge that he would like to basically bury them and that nothing more happened with it," }, { "start": 36.12, "end": 42.12, "text": "which is why I filed my motion to dismiss on January 16th prior to the January 17th hearing that" }, { "start": 42.12, "end": 48.38, "text": "took place for the first time in front of Judge Huddleston the next day, which is when I tried" }, { "start": 48.38, "end": 54.5, "text": "to represent myself after being found competent and I wasn't allowed to do that and my motion" }, { "start": 54.5, "end": 59.44, "text": "wasn't ruled on. So the discovery fraud hasn't been dealt with and then for trying to deal with that," }, { "start": 59.78, "end": 65.08, "text": "then I was found in, I wasn't even found incompetent. I was ruled to go to another competency evaluation." }, { "start": 65.8, "end": 70.1, "text": "So, so now you're telling me that in order to deal with the fraudulent discovery," }, { "start": 70.38, "end": 76.4, "text": "I have to go through this again and go to another psych eval, even though that's what I did and" }, { "start": 76.4, "end": 80.84, "text": "I've been trying to deal with the fraudulent discovery since fucking January of 2020," }, { "start": 81.38, "end": 85.62, "text": "2024, January 3rd or January 5th when I filed my first motion for it." }, { "start": 85.78, "end": 91.8, "text": "So on the record, it's discussed, it's went over in great detail and then also I'm sending you" }, { "start": 91.8, "end": 96.72, "text": "an email right now, which I just sent to you and Emmett," }, { "start": 96.9, "end": 102.46, "text": "which contains all of the, uh, the fraudulent documents that are," }, { "start": 102.68, "end": 107.74, "text": "uh, I just got sent, contains all the fraudulent documents that," }, { "start": 107.74, "end": 110.5, "text": "uh, exist in the record." } ] }, "004": { "file": "004__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 12.203, "segment_count": 2, "full_text": "Including for your client, Gordon Eugene Sharp, who has a, I don't know, he doesn't look very real. He has, let me give you the count here.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 7.34, "text": "Including for your client, Gordon Eugene Sharp, who has a, I don't know, he doesn't look very real." }, { "start": 9.02, "end": 11.8, "text": "He has, let me give you the count here." } ] }, "005": { "file": "005__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 162.006, "segment_count": 55, "full_text": "Since I have it. Gordon Sharp has 137 documents that have the same metadata create date, and my case has fraud in it too. He has 27 documents, and these are all digitally signed by the court, keep in mind, by their PKI signature. He has 20 documents that have a create date dated after the document e-file date. So the document was e-filed before the document was created, and that's in the metadata that's cryptographically locked into the document and signed by the court's digital watermarking stamp for every file that's downloaded from the MCRO system online. It automatically gets a full document signature. So if any tampering occurs with it, it becomes invalid. I have the certificate authority for that digital signature all locked away, and it's basically a very, very valid and official signature. It's handled and managed by a third party certificate authority it's called. And so my case, for example, I have two documents that were signed after, that were created after the date of filing, and signed after the date of filing. I have two fraudulent documents on, I have a clone set on July 13th of a finding of incompetency in order, and an order other that was then cloned a couple hours later and submitted as a order other of the incompetency order. And that contains multiple clones of the same digital signature. So it's a fraudulent document. And then also I have two documents that have a fraudulent e-Solutions signature on them, which is a 1024-bit RSA key that was deprecated in 2010. It's not even valid on official government. Like NIST has had it deprecated since for nearly 15 years, right? So it's a completely invalid digital signature. So Gordon Sharp has 137 documents that have the same exact create date, time, 130 documents that have the same instance ID, 117 or 115 documents that have the same cloned judicial signature images, 115 documents that have the same exact metadata date. And these are for, he has nine total cases. I have one obviously. And so there's a lot of fraud basically. And so I'm wondering how we can move forward with anything at all in the court when there is tons of fake documents in my case and in others.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 1.04, "text": "Since I have it." }, { "start": 1.04, "end": 4.62, "text": "Gordon Sharp has 137 documents" }, { "start": 4.62, "end": 7.48, "text": "that have the same metadata create date," }, { "start": 7.48, "end": 9.66, "text": "and my case has fraud in it too." }, { "start": 10.56, "end": 13.88, "text": "He has 27 documents," }, { "start": 13.88, "end": 15.56, "text": "and these are all digitally signed by the court," }, { "start": 15.56, "end": 18.2, "text": "keep in mind, by their PKI signature." }, { "start": 18.2, "end": 21.04, "text": "He has 20 documents that have a create date" }, { "start": 21.04, "end": 24.08, "text": "dated after the document e-file date." }, { "start": 24.08, "end": 28.12, "text": "So the document was e-filed" }, { "start": 28.12, "end": 30.44, "text": "before the document was created," }, { "start": 30.44, "end": 31.44, "text": "and that's in the metadata" }, { "start": 31.44, "end": 34.08, "text": "that's cryptographically locked into the document" }, { "start": 34.08, "end": 37.52, "text": "and signed by the court's digital watermarking stamp" }, { "start": 37.52, "end": 38.98, "text": "for every file that's downloaded" }, { "start": 38.98, "end": 41.12, "text": "from the MCRO system online." }, { "start": 41.12, "end": 43.72, "text": "It automatically gets a full document signature." }, { "start": 43.72, "end": 47.16, "text": "So if any tampering occurs with it, it becomes invalid." }, { "start": 47.16, "end": 49.78, "text": "I have the certificate authority" }, { "start": 49.78, "end": 52.62, "text": "for that digital signature all locked away," }, { "start": 52.62, "end": 54.4, "text": "and it's basically a very, very valid" }, { "start": 54.4, "end": 55.7, "text": "and official signature." }, { "start": 55.7, "end": 56.74, "text": "It's handled and managed" }, { "start": 56.74, "end": 58.98, "text": "by a third party certificate authority it's called." }, { "start": 58.98, "end": 61.14, "text": "And so my case, for example," }, { "start": 61.14, "end": 66.14, "text": "I have two documents that were signed after," }, { "start": 67.98, "end": 70.74, "text": "that were created after the date of filing," }, { "start": 70.74, "end": 73.22, "text": "and signed after the date of filing." }, { "start": 73.22, "end": 75.1, "text": "I have two fraudulent documents on," }, { "start": 76.0, "end": 78.38, "text": "I have a clone set on July 13th" }, { "start": 78.38, "end": 80.86, "text": "of a finding of incompetency in order," }, { "start": 80.86, "end": 85.62, "text": "and an order other that was then cloned a couple hours later" }, { "start": 85.62, "end": 90.8, "text": "and submitted as a order other of the incompetency order." }, { "start": 90.8, "end": 93.46, "text": "And that contains multiple clones" }, { "start": 93.46, "end": 94.68, "text": "of the same digital signature." }, { "start": 94.68, "end": 96.6, "text": "So it's a fraudulent document." }, { "start": 96.6, "end": 100.52, "text": "And then also I have two documents that have a fraudulent" }, { "start": 100.52, "end": 102.02, "text": "e-Solutions signature on them," }, { "start": 102.02, "end": 108.02, "text": "which is a 1024-bit RSA key that was deprecated in 2010." }, { "start": 108.02, "end": 111.32, "text": "It's not even valid on official government." }, { "start": 111.32, "end": 117.42, "text": "Like NIST has had it deprecated since for nearly 15 years, right?" }, { "start": 117.42, "end": 120.32, "text": "So it's a completely invalid digital signature." }, { "start": 120.32, "end": 124.56, "text": "So Gordon Sharp has 137 documents" }, { "start": 124.56, "end": 127.08, "text": "that have the same exact create date, time," }, { "start": 127.08, "end": 130.32, "text": "130 documents that have the same instance ID," }, { "start": 130.32, "end": 133.62, "text": "117 or 115 documents" }, { "start": 133.62, "end": 136.96, "text": "that have the same cloned judicial signature images," }, { "start": 136.96, "end": 140.76, "text": "115 documents that have the same exact metadata date." }, { "start": 140.76, "end": 144.76, "text": "And these are for, he has nine total cases." }, { "start": 144.76, "end": 146.86, "text": "I have one obviously." }, { "start": 148.1, "end": 151.62, "text": "And so there's a lot of fraud basically." }, { "start": 151.62, "end": 154.62, "text": "And so I'm wondering how we can move forward" }, { "start": 154.62, "end": 156.6, "text": "with anything at all in the court" }, { "start": 156.6, "end": 160.66, "text": "when there is tons of fake documents" }, { "start": 160.66, "end": 162.16, "text": "in my case and in others." } ] }, "006": { "file": "006__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 4.203, "segment_count": 1, "full_text": "Bernard Sharp, I believe, is your client that you had a hearing with today, if I'm not mistaken.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 3.36, "text": "Bernard Sharp, I believe, is your client that you had a hearing with today, if I'm not mistaken." } ] }, "007": { "file": "007__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 11.414, "segment_count": 3, "full_text": "I did not have a hearing today with anyone named Gordon Chart. Oh, he was on a calendar for the hearing schedule that I have. I have hearing schedules for a lot of people.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 3.1, "text": "I did not have a hearing today with anyone named Gordon Chart." }, { "start": 3.4, "end": 7.58, "text": "Oh, he was on a calendar for the hearing schedule that I have." }, { "start": 8.12, "end": 11.18, "text": "I have hearing schedules for a lot of people." } ] }, "008": { "file": "008__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 7.851, "segment_count": 3, "full_text": "I don't represent someone named Gordon Sharp right now. It doesn't mean that my name's not on their case. Sometimes my name gets put on cases wrongly.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 2.8, "text": "I don't represent someone named Gordon Sharp right now." }, { "start": 2.98, "end": 4.94, "text": "It doesn't mean that my name's not on their case." }, { "start": 5.08, "end": 7.64, "text": "Sometimes my name gets put on cases wrongly." } ] }, "009": { "file": "009__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 17.536, "segment_count": 8, "full_text": "Well, you represent Robert Balsimo when he was at the last hearing. So he's in my, so I have, tell him my information is apparently correct is what I'm saying. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. And that's, I don't think that that's you doing something wrong. I, I'm sure that the court record says that. Oh yeah. I think the court records are wrong a lot.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 2.6, "text": "Well, you represent Robert Balsimo when he was at the last hearing." }, { "start": 2.82, "end": 4.46, "text": "So he's in my, so I have," }, { "start": 5.38, "end": 8.16, "text": "tell him my information is apparently correct is what I'm saying." }, { "start": 8.28, "end": 9.28, "text": "Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah." }, { "start": 9.36, "end": 12.08, "text": "And that's, I don't think that that's you doing something wrong." }, { "start": 12.26, "end": 14.64, "text": "I, I'm sure that the court record says that." }, { "start": 14.92, "end": 15.52, "text": "Oh yeah." }, { "start": 15.52, "end": 17.48, "text": "I think the court records are wrong a lot." } ] }, "010": { "file": "010__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 14.955, "segment_count": 3, "full_text": "That's fine. I understand that. I'm just saying that regardless, Gordon Sharp is a very real case that really does exist, that I really do have signed court documents for. And those really are the stats for him, whether you're representing him or not. It's the same problem.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 6.32, "text": "That's fine. I understand that. I'm just saying that regardless, Gordon Sharp is a very real case that really does exist," }, { "start": 6.48, "end": 11.9, "text": "that I really do have signed court documents for. And those really are the stats for him," }, { "start": 11.96, "end": 14.7, "text": "whether you're representing him or not. It's the same problem." } ] }, "011": { "file": "011__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 3.008, "segment_count": 1, "full_text": "I could look up all this stuff in MCRO, you're right.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 2.64, "text": "I could look up all this stuff in MCRO, you're right." } ] }, "012": { "file": "012__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 27.606, "segment_count": 6, "full_text": "The limitations that I have as your public defender, which is that I can make arguments based on the law. And the problem that we are running into is what the law says is once you're found incompetent, then your case is paused. They can find you competent again, but then if they enter a finding after that, that you're not competent, then it pauses it again. So it's like competent, restart the clock, not competent, pause the clock again. And it can go back and forth and back and forth like that for people for years.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 6.46, "text": "The limitations that I have as your public defender, which is that I can make arguments" }, { "start": 6.46, "end": 11.1, "text": "based on the law. And the problem that we are running into is what the law says is once you're" }, { "start": 11.1, "end": 16.32, "text": "found incompetent, then your case is paused. They can find you competent again, but then if they" }, { "start": 16.32, "end": 20.2, "text": "enter a finding after that, that you're not competent, then it pauses it again. So it's like" }, { "start": 20.2, "end": 25.3, "text": "competent, restart the clock, not competent, pause the clock again. And it can go back and" }, { "start": 25.3, "end": 27.44, "text": "forth and back and forth like that for people for years." } ] }, "013": { "file": "013__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 5.654, "segment_count": 2, "full_text": "We can fight and argue that you're competent to proceed, but we can't do that until we get an updated report.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 3.0, "text": "We can fight and argue that you're competent to proceed," }, { "start": 3.26, "end": 5.54, "text": "but we can't do that until we get an updated report." } ] }, "014": { "file": "014__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 3.947, "segment_count": 2, "full_text": "Yeah, I know. It's a loop. It's a nice, it's a very... This is this terrible loop that we're in.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 2.36, "text": "Yeah, I know. It's a loop. It's a nice, it's a very..." }, { "start": 2.36, "end": 3.9, "text": "This is this terrible loop that we're in." } ] }, "015": { "file": "015__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 6.806, "segment_count": 3, "full_text": "The whole new competency law that was put into effect, I just finally read for the first time yesterday, astonishingly.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 2.7, "text": "The whole new competency law that was put into effect," }, { "start": 2.7, "end": 5.76, "text": "I just finally read for the first time yesterday," }, { "start": 5.76, "end": 6.96, "text": "astonishingly." } ] }, "016": { "file": "016__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 26.688, "segment_count": 12, "full_text": "The whole thing's a fucking loop. When you start at 611 point whatever and go down to the end of it, it points you back and forth to different statutes. And if you literally map those out like I did, because that's what I do apparently, right? I'm very good at mapping things out and figuring stuff out. So if you keep following that and referring to the thing it's pointing you back to, you literally end up in the same circle. So the entire statute itself is a fucking loop.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 1.38, "text": "The whole thing's a fucking loop." }, { "start": 1.92, "end": 4.72, "text": "When you start at 611 point whatever" }, { "start": 4.72, "end": 6.0, "text": "and go down to the end of it," }, { "start": 6.44, "end": 9.14, "text": "it points you back and forth to different statutes." }, { "start": 9.24, "end": 11.86, "text": "And if you literally map those out like I did," }, { "start": 11.94, "end": 13.42, "text": "because that's what I do apparently, right?" }, { "start": 13.42, "end": 15.08, "text": "I'm very good at mapping things out" }, { "start": 15.08, "end": 16.12, "text": "and figuring stuff out." }, { "start": 16.76, "end": 18.34, "text": "So if you keep following that" }, { "start": 18.34, "end": 20.76, "text": "and referring to the thing it's pointing you back to," }, { "start": 20.88, "end": 23.16, "text": "you literally end up in the same circle." }, { "start": 23.64, "end": 26.52, "text": "So the entire statute itself is a fucking loop." } ] }, "017": { "file": "017__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 10.752, "segment_count": 2, "full_text": "Which is good that I read it because I'm still out I was still operating on the the Rule 20 statutes that applied that they modified yeah they modified them all right they modified the fuck out of them you", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 6.02, "text": "Which is good that I read it because I'm still out I was still operating on the the Rule 20 statutes that applied" }, { "start": 6.02, "end": 10.72, "text": "that they modified yeah they modified them all right they modified the fuck out of them you" } ] }, "018": { "file": "018__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 4.971, "segment_count": 1, "full_text": "It looks like an authoritarian Soviet psychiatry manual is what it looks like.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 4.94, "text": "It looks like an authoritarian Soviet psychiatry manual is what it looks like." } ] }, "019": { "file": "019__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 19.307, "segment_count": 4, "full_text": "Literally, it's an infinite loop because every single thing, especially for a felony, you guys can, they can hold on to me for an infinite amount of time. It goes to one statute and then at the bottom it says, oh, disregard all these fucking things if the judge decides to do this, if they decide that you're never going to obtain competence.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 5.88, "text": "Literally, it's an infinite loop because every single thing, especially for a felony," }, { "start": 6.48, "end": 9.72, "text": "you guys can, they can hold on to me for an infinite amount of time." }, { "start": 9.84, "end": 14.9, "text": "It goes to one statute and then at the bottom it says, oh, disregard all these fucking things" }, { "start": 14.9, "end": 19.22, "text": "if the judge decides to do this, if they decide that you're never going to obtain competence." } ] }, "020": { "file": "020__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 27.755, "segment_count": 6, "full_text": "Every time I have a Rule 20 ordered, they also have to put me forward for commitment, do they not? That's part of the rules. Unless you're already under commitment, then yes. Yeah, so you have all of this control and all of this stuff that's a permanent loop. And then the way for me, you're telling me the way to get out of it is to participate in it. You're agreeing that the statute reads like a fucking inescapable logic trap, and it is.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 5.08, "text": "Every time I have a Rule 20 ordered, they also have to put me forward for commitment, do they not?" }, { "start": 5.2, "end": 5.98, "text": "That's part of the rules." }, { "start": 6.82, "end": 8.68, "text": "Unless you're already under commitment, then yes." }, { "start": 9.34, "end": 14.78, "text": "Yeah, so you have all of this control and all of this stuff that's a permanent loop." }, { "start": 15.04, "end": 19.08, "text": "And then the way for me, you're telling me the way to get out of it is to participate in it." }, { "start": 20.3, "end": 27.68, "text": "You're agreeing that the statute reads like a fucking inescapable logic trap, and it is." } ] }, "021": { "file": "021__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 13.12, "segment_count": 3, "full_text": "So tell me how that circle is supposed to help me with my actual legal to actually get my life back and actually be able to put this behind me, something that happened 33, 34 fucking months ago.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 6.48, "text": "So tell me how that circle is supposed to help me with my actual legal to actually" }, { "start": 6.48, "end": 11.44, "text": "get my life back and actually be able to put this behind me, something that happened 33," }, { "start": 11.66, "end": 12.84, "text": "34 fucking months ago." } ] }, "022": { "file": "022__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 23.446, "segment_count": 6, "full_text": "We used to apply this thing called evidence to the law. That's what determines everything is evidence. Evidence of guilt, evidence of innocence, evidence of your incompetence. So that's a sign to someone behind closed doors, and then we can do whatever the fuck we want. And then you'll keep looping back like the statute does, because that's how it's designed. Whoever wrote that statute, it's not an accident that it continuously loops.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 2.2, "text": "We used to apply this thing called evidence to the law." }, { "start": 2.6, "end": 4.6, "text": "That's what determines everything is evidence." }, { "start": 5.66, "end": 9.06, "text": "Evidence of guilt, evidence of innocence, evidence of your incompetence." }, { "start": 9.2, "end": 13.94, "text": "So that's a sign to someone behind closed doors, and then we can do whatever the fuck we want." }, { "start": 14.38, "end": 18.44, "text": "And then you'll keep looping back like the statute does, because that's how it's designed." }, { "start": 18.72, "end": 23.18, "text": "Whoever wrote that statute, it's not an accident that it continuously loops." } ] }, "023": { "file": "023__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 79.979, "segment_count": 13, "full_text": "So what's the whole angle of all this you guys are concerned about my competency because you're concerned about the court's concerned about me right so the whole the whole premise is matt we're we're just concerned about you we're just you know we're just trying to help you understand what a judge is you know we we're just you don't understand the court process so based on the new statute we can send you to jail A jail-based we can send you to a locked jail-based competency program so that you better understand what a judge is so then you can come back and have due process and justice so in between that time though we can send you to jail and then we can keep checking up on you and send you back to jail some more if a or b or go back to fucking section two above and then go back to b and c again so tell me how that is has anything to do at all with anything legal or the law like what the fuck am I looking at here what what am I what did I just read yesterday that keeps getting referred to over and over I heard it five times from the judge already it's called an infinite inescapable loop of authoritarian that's all based on weaponized psychology it has nothing at all to do with due process constitutional rights or what you claim to be an expert in the law", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 6.28, "text": "So what's the whole angle of all this you guys are concerned about my competency because you're concerned about the court's" }, { "start": 6.28, "end": 12.4, "text": "concerned about me right so the whole the whole premise is matt we're we're just" }, { "start": 12.4, "end": 18.8, "text": "concerned about you we're just you know we're just trying to help you understand what a judge is you know we" }, { "start": 18.8, "end": 25.04, "text": "we're just you don't understand the court process so based on the new statute we can send you to jail" }, { "start": 25.04, "end": 31.06, "text": "A jail-based we can send you to a locked jail-based competency program so that" }, { "start": 31.06, "end": 38.1, "text": "you better understand what a judge is so then you can come back and have due process and justice so" }, { "start": 38.1, "end": 44.22, "text": "in between that time though we can send you to jail and then we can keep checking up on you and send you back" }, { "start": 44.22, "end": 50.3, "text": "to jail some more if a or b or go back to fucking section two above and then go back to b" }, { "start": 50.3, "end": 56.34, "text": "and c again so tell me how that is has anything to do at all with anything legal or the law" }, { "start": 56.34, "end": 62.48, "text": "like what the fuck am I looking at here what what am I what did I just read yesterday that keeps" }, { "start": 62.48, "end": 69.42, "text": "getting referred to over and over I heard it five times from the judge already it's called an infinite inescapable loop of authoritarian" }, { "start": 69.42, "end": 75.56, "text": "that's all based on weaponized psychology it has nothing at all to do with due process" }, { "start": 75.56, "end": 79.62, "text": "constitutional rights or what you claim to be an expert in the law" } ] }, "024": { "file": "024__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 48.854, "segment_count": 10, "full_text": "All right I try to be polite with you but look I from a personal standpoint I also don't like this law I don't like how it's written but as a lawyer can I just say fuck this law we don't have to follow it no I can't advise you of that I cannot you know that's not the advice I can give you the advice I can give you is here's ways that we can challenge it and legally right now the position that we are in is we cannot have a substantive legal proceeding while you are found not competent because it has been determined on the record that you don't have the ability to engage in those things so we can't do them until you have the ability to engage that is legally the position that we're in even though you and I have more complex conversations about the law than I do with a lot of my colleagues you", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 6.96, "text": "All right I try to be polite with you but look I from a personal standpoint I also don't like" }, { "start": 6.96, "end": 12.3, "text": "this law I don't like how it's written but as a lawyer can I just say fuck this law we don't have" }, { "start": 12.3, "end": 16.36, "text": "to follow it no I can't advise you of that I cannot you know that's not the advice I can give" }, { "start": 16.36, "end": 22.36, "text": "you the advice I can give you is here's ways that we can challenge it and legally right now the" }, { "start": 22.36, "end": 29.2, "text": "position that we are in is we cannot have a substantive legal proceeding while you are found" }, { "start": 29.2, "end": 35.04, "text": "not competent because it has been determined on the record that you don't have the ability to" }, { "start": 35.04, "end": 40.46, "text": "engage in those things so we can't do them until you have the ability to engage that is legally" }, { "start": 40.46, "end": 46.9, "text": "the position that we're in even though you and I have more complex conversations about the law than" }, { "start": 46.9, "end": 48.46, "text": "I do with a lot of my colleagues" }, { "start": 48.46, "end": 56.3, "text": "you" } ] }, "025": { "file": "025__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 9.344, "segment_count": 2, "full_text": "What about all the fraudulent documents my very first competency order by Judge Lionel Norris I have is doesn't even have real signatures on it", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 4.88, "text": "What about all the fraudulent documents my very first competency order by Judge Lionel Norris" }, { "start": 4.88, "end": 9.28, "text": "I have is doesn't even have real signatures on it" } ] }, "026": { "file": "026__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 21.376, "segment_count": 8, "full_text": "It's just a clone stamp signature. I'm viewing at the foundational level. You're still, what you're discussing is the law. I understand that. But you're pretending like everything before this point has been on the up and up and is legitimate. It's not. I'm telling you the whole fucking thing is illegitimate. And I have digital forensic proof of that now.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 2.3, "text": "It's just a clone stamp signature." }, { "start": 2.96, "end": 4.84, "text": "I'm viewing at the foundational level." }, { "start": 5.08, "end": 6.9, "text": "You're still, what you're discussing is the law." }, { "start": 7.0, "end": 7.68, "text": "I understand that." }, { "start": 8.06, "end": 13.92, "text": "But you're pretending like everything before this point has been on the up and up and is legitimate." }, { "start": 14.26, "end": 14.82, "text": "It's not." }, { "start": 15.22, "end": 18.68, "text": "I'm telling you the whole fucking thing is illegitimate." }, { "start": 18.68, "end": 21.3, "text": "And I have digital forensic proof of that now." } ] }, "027": { "file": "027__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 13.078, "segment_count": 3, "full_text": "So then I think what we do today is we say, Judge, we need a longer hearing. We want to make a record about why it is that Mr. Guertin didn't participate in the eval, and we need a longer hearing in order to make a record about this.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 3.54, "text": "So then I think what we do today is we say, Judge, we need a longer hearing." }, { "start": 4.64, "end": 10.48, "text": "We want to make a record about why it is that Mr. Guertin didn't participate in the eval," }, { "start": 10.58, "end": 13.04, "text": "and we need a longer hearing in order to make a record about this." } ] }, "028": { "file": "028__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 9.174, "segment_count": 5, "full_text": "Because they've got like 100 people scheduled. Yeah, her name is Danielle C. Mercurio. Yes. And so if you want anybody... She's Judge Julia Dayton Klein's partner in crime.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 2.14, "text": "Because they've got like 100 people scheduled." }, { "start": 2.38, "end": 4.6, "text": "Yeah, her name is Danielle C. Mercurio." }, { "start": 5.02, "end": 5.38, "text": "Yes." }, { "start": 5.62, "end": 6.88, "text": "And so if you want anybody..." }, { "start": 6.88, "end": 8.82, "text": "She's Judge Julia Dayton Klein's partner in crime." } ] }, "029": { "file": "029__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 37.12, "segment_count": 6, "full_text": "Want to hear an interesting statistic um DNA evidence right that sends people to death row or you know that sends people to prison for life or death row if their DNA is found in a crime scene well an SHA-256 hash which is the same algorithm that runs bitcoin and it's cryptographic right so you put anything into it that that hash in terms of if you compare it to DNA it makes DNA look like you're flipping a coin the hash is a quintillion quintillion times more of a non-chance than human DNA evidence", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 6.22, "text": "Want to hear an interesting statistic um DNA evidence right that sends people" }, { "start": 6.22, "end": 12.24, "text": "to death row or you know that sends people to prison for life or death row if their DNA is found in a" }, { "start": 12.24, "end": 18.3, "text": "crime scene well an SHA-256 hash which is the same algorithm that runs bitcoin" }, { "start": 18.3, "end": 24.68, "text": "and it's cryptographic right so you put anything into it that that hash in terms of" }, { "start": 24.68, "end": 30.7, "text": "if you compare it to DNA it makes DNA look like you're flipping a coin the hash is a quintillion" }, { "start": 30.7, "end": 36.94, "text": "quintillion times more of a non-chance than human DNA evidence" } ] }, "030": { "file": "030__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 17.11, "segment_count": 4, "full_text": "It's basically just it's a unique digital identifier if you it's the only thing you got to know is that if you put if you put the same thing in you'll get the same code out it doesn't matter what you put into it it spits out a 64-bit character that has billions and billions of possibilities right so it's an identifier it's a digital fingerprint", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 4.08, "text": "It's basically just it's a unique digital identifier if you it's the only thing you got" }, { "start": 4.08, "end": 8.64, "text": "to know is that if you put if you put the same thing in you'll get the same code out it doesn't" }, { "start": 8.64, "end": 13.52, "text": "matter what you put into it it spits out a 64-bit character that has billions and billions of" }, { "start": 13.52, "end": 19.04, "text": "possibilities right so it's an identifier it's a digital fingerprint" } ] }, "031": { "file": "031__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 40.022, "segment_count": 8, "full_text": "And so all this data that I'm talking about is that when you download a document from MCRO, that's when it gets officially signed by the court. So when you download a document from the MCRO, every single document that you download, that's when it gets the court's official stamp on it. And that official stamp is automatically applied. That's that watermarking, right? The watermarking with the Minnesota Judicial Branch? The watermarking is the image you can see, but if you actually look at the document, what it actually does is it takes all the bits of the document, every single byte, the zeros and ones that make up the entire thing, and it stamps the entire document by hashing all those bits.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 6.02, "text": "And so all this data that I'm talking about is that when you download a document from MCRO," }, { "start": 6.42, "end": 11.54, "text": "that's when it gets officially signed by the court. So when you download a document from the MCRO," }, { "start": 11.84, "end": 16.46, "text": "every single document that you download, that's when it gets the court's official stamp on it." }, { "start": 16.56, "end": 20.58, "text": "And that official stamp is automatically applied. That's that watermarking, right?" }, { "start": 20.7, "end": 26.3, "text": "The watermarking with the Minnesota Judicial Branch? The watermarking is the image you can see," }, { "start": 26.36, "end": 32.38, "text": "but if you actually look at the document, what it actually does is it takes all the bits" }, { "start": 32.38, "end": 39.08, "text": "of the document, every single byte, the zeros and ones that make up the entire thing, and it stamps the entire document by hashing" }, { "start": 39.08, "end": 39.76, "text": "all those bits." } ] }, "032": { "file": "032__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 13.952, "segment_count": 3, "full_text": "Documents so the Minnesota Judicial Branch has a certificate authority that manages that's how official this is manages their certificates it only has a two-year lifespan it has an expiration date it's very official right", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 6.12, "text": "Documents so the Minnesota Judicial Branch has a certificate authority that manages that's how" }, { "start": 6.12, "end": 12.44, "text": "official this is manages their certificates it only has a two-year lifespan it has an expiration date" }, { "start": 12.44, "end": 13.52, "text": "it's very official right" } ] }, "033": { "file": "033__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 57.92, "segment_count": 11, "full_text": "So so I don't know if you're in on the gig. I mean, I represent people in court and I file stuff and stuff that I file shows up in MCRO. And the one thing I can tell you is because I remember when you were looking at my metadata of some stuff I file and then you talked about Andrew Ryland. And Andrew Ryland is a manager in my office who, well, at the time I started in this office in August of 2022, he was a manager in this office. And I got a Word document from him that was a motion. And I continued to use that same motion for every pretty much everything I've ever filed in court after that, because it had that heading on it on the top of the Word document. And so I use that and I just changed it. And so I think based on what you were saying, when you were saying all this metadata looks like all the documents were originally created by Andrew Ryland. I'm like, I think all of my Microsoft Word documents are going to show that they were originally created by Andrew Ryland for that reason.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 4.0, "text": "So so I don't know if you're in on the gig. I mean," }, { "start": 4.16, "end": 8.66, "text": "I represent people in court and I file stuff and stuff that I file shows up in MCRO." }, { "start": 8.92, "end": 15.06, "text": "And the one thing I can tell you is because I remember when you were looking at my metadata of some stuff I file and" }, { "start": 15.06, "end": 21.28, "text": "then you talked about Andrew Ryland. And Andrew Ryland is a manager in my office who," }, { "start": 21.48, "end": 26.66, "text": "well, at the time I started in this office in August of 2022, he was a manager in this office." }, { "start": 27.34, "end": 33.36, "text": "And I got a Word document from him that was a motion. And I continued to use that same" }, { "start": 33.36, "end": 39.48, "text": "motion for every pretty much everything I've ever filed in court after that, because it had that heading on it on the top of the Word" }, { "start": 39.48, "end": 45.54, "text": "document. And so I use that and I just changed it. And so I think based on what you were saying," }, { "start": 45.62, "end": 50.38, "text": "when you were saying all this metadata looks like all the documents were originally created by Andrew Ryland. I'm like," }, { "start": 50.48, "end": 56.88, "text": "I think all of my Microsoft Word documents are going to show that they were originally created by Andrew Ryland" }, { "start": 56.88, "end": 57.82, "text": "for that reason." } ] }, "034": { "file": "034__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 15.616, "segment_count": 3, "full_text": "Maybe that's the demands for discovery. I don't file an office assistant files those. So those ones I don't do. But anything that's a motion, the objection that we did for your competency, anything with like, I mean, I could tell you if I filed it and wrote it and it would have started that way.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 4.36, "text": "Maybe that's the demands for discovery. I don't file an office assistant files those." }, { "start": 4.36, "end": 10.16, "text": "So those ones I don't do. But anything that's a motion, the objection that we did for your competency," }, { "start": 10.94, "end": 15.44, "text": "anything with like, I mean, I could tell you if I filed it and wrote it and it would have started that way." } ] }, "035": { "file": "035__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 21.035, "segment_count": 4, "full_text": "There's all sorts of possibilities for various things that could explain some stuff away but there's there's plenty of stuff for other stuff that can't be explained away we're talking about statistical probabilities and one in billions and billions of to the level of being impossible I've broken this down based upon statistical analysis", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 6.08, "text": "There's all sorts of possibilities for various things that could explain some stuff away but there's there's" }, { "start": 6.08, "end": 12.1, "text": "plenty of stuff for other stuff that can't be explained away we're talking about statistical probabilities and" }, { "start": 12.1, "end": 18.22, "text": "one in billions and billions of to the level of being impossible I've broken this" }, { "start": 18.22, "end": 20.74, "text": "down based upon statistical analysis" } ] }, "036": { "file": "036__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 8.811, "segment_count": 2, "full_text": "Why would a client have 36 cases active? I do not have any clients that have 36 open cases.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 3.42, "text": "Why would a client have 36 cases active?" }, { "start": 5.46, "end": 8.72, "text": "I do not have any clients that have 36 open cases." } ] }, "037": { "file": "037__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 9.579, "segment_count": 2, "full_text": "The 163 cases that I downloaded which the whole thing the whole reason for me having all this stuff is a fluke understand that right the fluke is", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 5.84, "text": "The 163 cases that I downloaded which the whole thing the whole reason for me having all this" }, { "start": 5.84, "end": 9.36, "text": "stuff is a fluke understand that right the fluke is" } ] }, "038": { "file": "038__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 331.435, "segment_count": 53, "full_text": "Is that the only reason I downloaded it initially was because I was like why are these same three people controlling every decision right so there was a completely different reason for why I was interested in it and then it was just sort of like a little experiment because I was like oh look ChatGPT can help me code stuff so the so initially because of what was going on in the ambush civil commitment hearing where I was told there was no court and whatever basically I went into a different mode that was after I've narrowly avoided the february 1st 2024 hearing that was scheduled in the civil case right after that is when so before that I was working on my I got patent documents right now from international patent I haven't even opened I don't even care about that anymore I'm trying to get out of this right like that's when my whole focus said okay like that's when my modes shifted right so so because of that and because I was going to file my Minnesota Court of Appeals case I had ChatGPT write a little script initially where I could go on the Minnesota Court of Appeals website and I could download all of the cases it would go pink and open the website and it would download all of them because then I could just use all of them to assemble and to learn about proper structure and language and and case law because there's a ton of case law in them right so I was basically I basically made this downloader to group documents together for the same type of case that I figured out I needed to file to try to deal with what I wanted to deal with right so there there's one piece I have this downloader thing that can just download a bunch of court documents right well then after then all of a sudden I asked myself why my mom after my mom sent the letter address to Judge Qualm and then that was intercepted by Julia Dayton Klein and Lee Qualm or whatever I'm like now they're now the mail's not even fucking getting to I'm like so Judge Qualm is on my case the entire time he never had any part of it and I'm like and now my mom sends a letter and the motherfucking mail the U.S. Postal mail isn't even getting to them that's also going to these same people I'm like what the fuck is going on here right so so that that's the premise why are these three people controlling my case right and that's when I had the bright idea to go on the website and I'm like so and I downloaded basically every hearing for them from January 1st up until august or april 26 of 2024 right to mirror my case and then I only did the three judges all their hearings during that time range the three judges that were in my case so the 163 cases I have is the most precise relevant possible set of data you could ever get as it pertains to me because it's the exact same time range in the exact same three judicial officers and then the 163 cases are only the cases that they all had a hearing for all three of them had a hearing for during that time range and that's out of 4 200 some cases now that I reanalyzed it initially it was just text I wasn't looking at all this stuff I was just like filter these out do this that's what I ended up with so this data set that I have is is not just me going oh I downloaded a bunch of files because I started clicking buttons one night and I found some weird things the data set is directly relevant to me because it connects with all the same three judicial officers so just the data set itself before and then so I download that and my whole trip is uh simply the control aspect I filed it three days later and just said they're they're controlling every aspect of my case and they're not even they're now they're jumping over to the civil side so like what the hell's going on this isn't this isn't justice like why why how can it be fair if the same three people have been bouncing decisions back and forth that was my only thing right and then for one year that was it and there were fake names in it there were weird names but so out of those cases out of those 163 cases there is only 77 defendants Lucas Patrick Crassi who europe europe is one of your clients apparently has 12 cases gordon eugene sharp that was supposed to be on today has nine cases so all these documents are being cloned across all these I call them cluster cases so there's there's nine cases there's five cases so they so it's and they all have slightly different name variations some of them have junior at the end some of them don't have junior some of them have a different middle name and but they're all connected because when I look up the criminal case hearings they're all have the same birthday and they're all tagged because all the documents are cloned so you have basically what's going on is that you have 12 cases for Lucas Patrick Crassi right and so he'll have a filing on march 5th of 2020 let's say and then that same document is submitted at the same exact time across all the cases and has the same exact it's a clone it's a fraudulent it has the same digital signature the same uh date it's for the same type so someone someone makes one filing copies it 12 times and then the only thing that changes is that it has the different case number on it and then they're all submitted like one minute apart into the MCRO how what tell me what legal universe that would be makes sense", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 6.2, "text": "Is that the only reason I downloaded it initially was because I was like why are" }, { "start": 6.2, "end": 12.32, "text": "these same three people controlling every decision right so there was a completely different reason for why I was" }, { "start": 12.32, "end": 18.36, "text": "interested in it and then it was just sort of like a little experiment because I was like oh look ChatGPT can help me code" }, { "start": 18.36, "end": 24.66, "text": "stuff so the so initially because of what was going on in the ambush civil commitment hearing" }, { "start": 24.66, "end": 30.82, "text": "where I was told there was no court and whatever basically I went into a different mode that was after I've narrowly" }, { "start": 30.82, "end": 36.86, "text": "avoided the february 1st 2024 hearing that was scheduled in the civil case right after" }, { "start": 36.86, "end": 43.02, "text": "that is when so before that I was working on my I got patent documents right now from international patent" }, { "start": 43.02, "end": 49.14, "text": "I haven't even opened I don't even care about that anymore I'm trying to get out of this right like that's when my whole" }, { "start": 49.14, "end": 55.2, "text": "focus said okay like that's when my modes shifted right so" }, { "start": 55.2, "end": 61.64, "text": "so because of that and because I was going to file my Minnesota Court of Appeals case I had" }, { "start": 61.64, "end": 67.96, "text": "ChatGPT write a little script initially where I could go on the Minnesota Court of Appeals website and I could download all" }, { "start": 67.96, "end": 74.06, "text": "of the cases it would go pink and open the website and it would download all of them because then I could just use all of them" }, { "start": 74.06, "end": 80.36, "text": "to assemble and to learn about proper structure and language and and case" }, { "start": 80.36, "end": 86.56, "text": "law because there's a ton of case law in them right so I was basically I basically made this downloader to group documents" }, { "start": 86.56, "end": 92.6, "text": "together for the same type of case that I figured out I needed to file to try to deal with what I wanted to deal with right so there" }, { "start": 92.6, "end": 98.94, "text": "there's one piece I have this downloader thing that can just download a bunch of court documents right well then after then" }, { "start": 98.94, "end": 105.36, "text": "all of a sudden I asked myself why my mom after my mom sent the letter address" }, { "start": 105.36, "end": 112.1, "text": "to Judge Qualm and then that was intercepted by Julia Dayton Klein and Lee Qualm or whatever I'm like now" }, { "start": 112.1, "end": 118.24, "text": "they're now the mail's not even fucking getting to I'm like so Judge Qualm is on my case the entire time he never had any" }, { "start": 118.24, "end": 124.58, "text": "part of it and I'm like and now my mom sends a letter and the motherfucking mail the U.S. Postal mail isn't" }, { "start": 124.58, "end": 130.64, "text": "even getting to them that's also going to these same people I'm like what the fuck is going on here right so so that that's the" }, { "start": 130.64, "end": 137.04, "text": "premise why are these three people controlling my case right and that's when I had the bright idea to go on the website and" }, { "start": 137.04, "end": 143.64, "text": "I'm like so and I downloaded basically every hearing for them from" }, { "start": 143.64, "end": 150.24, "text": "January 1st up until august or april 26 of 2024 right to" }, { "start": 150.24, "end": 156.3, "text": "mirror my case and then I only did the three judges all their hearings during that time" }, { "start": 156.3, "end": 163.04, "text": "range the three judges that were in my case so the 163 cases I have is" }, { "start": 163.04, "end": 169.5, "text": "the most precise relevant possible set of data you could ever get as it pertains to me because" }, { "start": 169.5, "end": 176.02, "text": "it's the exact same time range in the exact same three judicial officers and then the 163 cases are" }, { "start": 176.02, "end": 182.08, "text": "only the cases that they all had a hearing for all three of them had a hearing for during that time range" }, { "start": 182.08, "end": 188.4, "text": "and that's out of 4 200 some cases now that I reanalyzed it initially it was just text" }, { "start": 188.4, "end": 194.48, "text": "I wasn't looking at all this stuff I was just like filter these out do this that's what I ended up with so this data set" }, { "start": 194.48, "end": 200.74, "text": "that I have is is not just me going oh I downloaded a bunch of files because I started clicking buttons one night and" }, { "start": 200.74, "end": 206.92, "text": "I found some weird things the data set is directly relevant to me because it connects with" }, { "start": 206.92, "end": 213.06, "text": "all the same three judicial officers so just the data set itself before and then so I download that and" }, { "start": 213.06, "end": 219.82, "text": "my whole trip is uh simply the control aspect I filed it three days later and just said they're" }, { "start": 219.82, "end": 225.9, "text": "they're controlling every aspect of my case and they're not even they're now they're jumping over to the civil side so like" }, { "start": 225.9, "end": 232.0, "text": "what the hell's going on this isn't this isn't justice like why why how can it be fair" }, { "start": 232.0, "end": 238.1, "text": "if the same three people have been bouncing decisions back and forth that was my only thing right and then for one year" }, { "start": 238.1, "end": 244.64, "text": "that was it and there were fake names in it there were weird names but so out of those cases out" }, { "start": 244.64, "end": 251.02, "text": "of those 163 cases there is only 77 defendants Lucas Patrick Crassi" }, { "start": 251.02, "end": 257.32, "text": "who europe europe is one of your clients apparently has 12 cases gordon" }, { "start": 257.32, "end": 263.52, "text": "eugene sharp that was supposed to be on today has nine cases so all these documents are being cloned across" }, { "start": 263.52, "end": 269.82, "text": "all these I call them cluster cases so there's there's nine cases there's five cases" }, { "start": 269.82, "end": 275.92, "text": "so they so it's and they all have slightly different name variations some of them have junior at the end some of them don't have" }, { "start": 275.92, "end": 282.28, "text": "junior some of them have a different middle name and but they're all connected because when I look up the criminal case hearings" }, { "start": 282.28, "end": 288.46, "text": "they're all have the same birthday and they're all tagged because all the documents are cloned so" }, { "start": 288.46, "end": 294.6, "text": "you have basically what's going on is that you have 12 cases for Lucas Patrick Crassi right and so" }, { "start": 294.6, "end": 300.68, "text": "he'll have a filing on march 5th of 2020 let's say and then that same" }, { "start": 300.68, "end": 306.96, "text": "document is submitted at the same exact time across all the cases and has the same exact it's a clone" }, { "start": 306.96, "end": 313.0, "text": "it's a fraudulent it has the same digital signature the same uh date it's for the same" }, { "start": 313.0, "end": 319.02, "text": "type so someone someone makes one filing copies it 12 times and then the only thing" }, { "start": 319.02, "end": 326.4, "text": "that changes is that it has the different case number on it and then they're all submitted like one minute apart into the MCRO how" }, { "start": 326.4, "end": 331.16, "text": "what tell me what legal universe that would be makes sense" } ] }, "039": { "file": "039__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 28.886, "segment_count": 6, "full_text": "I mean, I can show you the e-filing system and when I need to e-file something in multiple cases at once, and I literally upload a document to our system and I click through the button. And so it does end up getting filed like a minute apart. And then a clerk on the other end has to approve it for it to actually show up in MCRO. So my guess is that they get a bunch of notifications and they go through and they click approve, approve, approve, and then it's the same document over and over and over again.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 5.44, "text": "I mean, I can show you the e-filing system and when I need to e-file something in multiple" }, { "start": 5.44, "end": 11.3, "text": "cases at once, and I literally upload a document to our system and I click through the button." }, { "start": 11.64, "end": 14.9, "text": "And so it does end up getting filed like a minute apart." }, { "start": 15.1, "end": 20.08, "text": "And then a clerk on the other end has to approve it for it to actually show up in MCRO." }, { "start": 20.08, "end": 23.34, "text": "So my guess is that they get a bunch of notifications and they go through and they" }, { "start": 23.34, "end": 28.66, "text": "click approve, approve, approve, and then it's the same document over and over and over again." } ] }, "040": { "file": "040__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 65.046, "segment_count": 41, "full_text": "I don't know how it would look. I can just tell you from my end, if I represent somebody, like say I have a client who's in custody and they've got three different cases and they're in jail, right? They pick up one case, they get released on bail, they get rearrested. So they're charged with a new offense. They're back in jail. They let them, they pay bail. They get out again. We still haven't resolved either of the first two cases. They get a third offense. This time the judge says, you know what, I'm setting your bail so high you can't pay it, right? So they're sitting in jail and they've got three cases. If I want their bail to be reviewed, I file something into all three cases saying, hey judge, we need a bail hearing. I'm requesting to review the conditions of release. And so the way I do it on my end is I create a Word document. I retype it, request. I'll honestly probably go find who I filed this for before. So I'll search in my files, request review conditions of release. I'll find a motion I did for somebody else. I'll pull it up. I'll resave it in this client's file. I'll change the name. I'll change the case number. I'll change any of the pertinent facts and then I'll go upload it into their case file in my system. And then I go through our e-file system and it'll click.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 0.9, "text": "I don't know how it would look." }, { "start": 0.96, "end": 2.32, "text": "I can just tell you from my end," }, { "start": 2.84, "end": 4.08, "text": "if I represent somebody," }, { "start": 4.42, "end": 6.18, "text": "like say I have a client who's in custody" }, { "start": 6.18, "end": 7.9, "text": "and they've got three different cases" }, { "start": 7.9, "end": 8.92, "text": "and they're in jail, right?" }, { "start": 9.3, "end": 10.5, "text": "They pick up one case," }, { "start": 10.82, "end": 12.32, "text": "they get released on bail," }, { "start": 12.7, "end": 13.76, "text": "they get rearrested." }, { "start": 13.8, "end": 15.18, "text": "So they're charged with a new offense." }, { "start": 15.36, "end": 16.38, "text": "They're back in jail." }, { "start": 16.94, "end": 18.44, "text": "They let them, they pay bail." }, { "start": 18.56, "end": 19.36, "text": "They get out again." }, { "start": 19.92, "end": 21.92, "text": "We still haven't resolved either of the first two cases." }, { "start": 22.0, "end": 22.84, "text": "They get a third offense." }, { "start": 22.94, "end": 23.84, "text": "This time the judge says," }, { "start": 23.9, "end": 25.02, "text": "you know what, I'm setting your bail so high" }, { "start": 25.02, "end": 25.96, "text": "you can't pay it, right?" }, { "start": 25.96, "end": 26.8, "text": "So they're sitting in jail" }, { "start": 26.8, "end": 28.0, "text": "and they've got three cases." }, { "start": 28.0, "end": 31.34, "text": "If I want their bail to be reviewed," }, { "start": 31.56, "end": 34.24, "text": "I file something into all three cases saying," }, { "start": 34.4, "end": 35.54, "text": "hey judge, we need a bail hearing." }, { "start": 35.68, "end": 37.72, "text": "I'm requesting to review the conditions of release." }, { "start": 38.52, "end": 39.82, "text": "And so the way I do it on my end" }, { "start": 39.82, "end": 41.08, "text": "is I create a Word document." }, { "start": 41.44, "end": 43.08, "text": "I retype it, request." }, { "start": 43.26, "end": 45.16, "text": "I'll honestly probably go find" }, { "start": 45.16, "end": 46.66, "text": "who I filed this for before." }, { "start": 46.78, "end": 47.94, "text": "So I'll search in my files," }, { "start": 48.06, "end": 49.54, "text": "request review conditions of release." }, { "start": 49.62, "end": 51.22, "text": "I'll find a motion I did for somebody else." }, { "start": 51.38, "end": 52.26, "text": "I'll pull it up." }, { "start": 52.34, "end": 54.12, "text": "I'll resave it in this client's file." }, { "start": 54.3, "end": 55.54, "text": "I'll change the name." }, { "start": 55.62, "end": 56.96, "text": "I'll change the case number." }, { "start": 56.96, "end": 59.16, "text": "I'll change any of the pertinent facts" }, { "start": 59.16, "end": 60.82, "text": "and then I'll go upload it" }, { "start": 60.82, "end": 62.72, "text": "into their case file in my system." }, { "start": 62.88, "end": 64.36, "text": "And then I go through our e-file system" }, { "start": 64.36, "end": 64.96, "text": "and it'll click." } ] }, "041": { "file": "041__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 31.04, "segment_count": 6, "full_text": "I understand that there's certainly an aspect of bulk processing you have to deal with that involves, okay, click, click, click, click, click, next, right? I understand that. That's for anything, right? Especially in your world of documents or whatever. The thing that can't be explained away is out of the 3,600 documents I have, there's over 500 that have a creation metadata create date that is later than the e-filing date.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 6.5, "text": "I understand that there's certainly an aspect of bulk processing you have to deal with that" }, { "start": 6.5, "end": 11.48, "text": "involves, okay, click, click, click, click, click, next, right? I understand that." }, { "start": 11.9, "end": 16.1, "text": "That's for anything, right? Especially in your world of documents or whatever." }, { "start": 16.1, "end": 22.12, "text": "The thing that can't be explained away is out of the 3,600" }, { "start": 22.12, "end": 28.28, "text": "documents I have, there's over 500 that have a creation metadata create date that" }, { "start": 28.28, "end": 30.74, "text": "is later than the e-filing date." } ] }, "042": { "file": "042__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 31.254, "segment_count": 9, "full_text": "Yeah, that's, I don't know. I don't know how that, I don't know how any of that stuff works. Yeah, it doesn't work. All that is over my head. It doesn't work because you can't e-file something that hasn't been created yet. That's very, that's the most damning part of all of it. And there's, I have, I have two documents or a document in my own case. And there's other documents that are, have a digital signature, the fraudulent e-Solutions. The digital signature is applied after the document. One of them's five days after the document was e-filed.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 3.38, "text": "Yeah, that's, I don't know. I don't know how that, I don't know how any of that stuff works." }, { "start": 3.4, "end": 4.64, "text": "Yeah, it doesn't work." }, { "start": 4.64, "end": 5.9, "text": "All that is over my head." }, { "start": 5.9, "end": 10.5, "text": "It doesn't work because you can't e-file something that hasn't been created yet." }, { "start": 11.5, "end": 14.24, "text": "That's very, that's the most damning part of all of it." }, { "start": 14.48, "end": 18.72, "text": "And there's, I have, I have two documents or a document in my own case." }, { "start": 18.9, "end": 23.98, "text": "And there's other documents that are, have a digital signature, the fraudulent e-Solutions." }, { "start": 24.74, "end": 27.36, "text": "The digital signature is applied after the document." }, { "start": 27.36, "end": 30.78, "text": "One of them's five days after the document was e-filed." } ] }, "043": { "file": "043__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 18.411, "segment_count": 4, "full_text": "Was it some type of order? Because sometimes what will happen is that they'll submit what they call proposed orders and then the judge will go through and then they'll put an e-signature on the proposed order. And then it gets refiled as a signed one. But I don't know. That's just my best guess at that.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 6.36, "text": "Was it some type of order? Because sometimes what will happen is that they'll submit what they call proposed orders" }, { "start": 6.36, "end": 11.32, "text": "and then the judge will go through and then they'll put an e-signature on the proposed order." }, { "start": 11.48, "end": 16.12, "text": "And then it gets refiled as a signed one. But I don't know." }, { "start": 16.28, "end": 18.02, "text": "That's just my best guess at that." } ] }, "044": { "file": "044__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 6.507, "segment_count": 2, "full_text": "If you look in MCRO, before you see actual signed order, you should see an entry for A proposed order if that's what's happening.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 4.2, "text": "If you look in MCRO, before you see actual signed order, you should see an entry for" }, { "start": 4.2, "end": 6.22, "text": "A proposed order if that's what's happening." } ] }, "045": { "file": "045__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 45.91, "segment_count": 9, "full_text": "I know that you can't create a document after it was, you can't e-file a document before it was created. My two initial documents in my case, the two earliest documents, and I have a fraudulent signature on my initial thing that matches all the other ones. It's a visual signature, right? Yeah. It's not like, oh, maybe that's the same. It's the fucking same. I took five of them, whatever. So, and so the two earliest documents have an e-filing date and then they're created, whatever. So there's not, there's plenty, I understand there's plenty of explanations to say, yeah, there's a lot of people and we click buttons. I get it. Like, that's the only way you're going to have any part of your day left, right? Sometimes. Yeah, but I also.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 5.58, "text": "I know that you can't create a document after it was, you can't e-file a document before it was created." }, { "start": 7.0, "end": 13.02, "text": "My two initial documents in my case, the two earliest documents, and I have a fraudulent signature on my" }, { "start": 13.02, "end": 17.6, "text": "initial thing that matches all the other ones. It's a visual signature, right?" }, { "start": 19.22, "end": 24.76, "text": "Yeah. It's not like, oh, maybe that's the same. It's the fucking same. I took five of them," }, { "start": 24.86, "end": 30.16, "text": "whatever. So, and so the two earliest documents have an e-filing date and then they're created," }, { "start": 30.3, "end": 34.8, "text": "whatever. So there's not, there's plenty, I understand there's plenty of explanations to say," }, { "start": 35.0, "end": 39.6, "text": "yeah, there's a lot of people and we click buttons. I get it. Like," }, { "start": 39.72, "end": 44.38, "text": "that's the only way you're going to have any part of your day left, right? Sometimes." }, { "start": 45.0, "end": 45.8, "text": "Yeah, but I also." } ] }, "046": { "file": "046__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 14.038, "segment_count": 2, "full_text": "Look I don't think it's wrong for you to be pointing out the problems with the Judges just clicking buttons especially when they're doing like serious orders and you know pointing out this order is the exact same and these things mirror Each other and like this is a problem", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 7.38, "text": "Look I don't think it's wrong for you to be pointing out the problems with the Judges just clicking buttons especially when they're doing like serious orders" }, { "start": 7.38, "end": 13.8, "text": "and you know pointing out this order is the exact same and these things mirror Each other and like this is a problem" } ] }, "047": { "file": "047__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 7.168, "segment_count": 4, "full_text": "I carry it on an audit, basically. Yeah, yeah. It's a valid professional one. Yes, it is.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 1.84, "text": "I carry it on an audit, basically." }, { "start": 2.42, "end": 3.48, "text": "Yeah, yeah." }, { "start": 3.48, "end": 5.7, "text": "It's a valid professional one." }, { "start": 6.12, "end": 6.76, "text": "Yes, it is." } ] }, "048": { "file": "048__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 21.568, "segment_count": 5, "full_text": "Mapp versus Ohio and all of the fruit of the poisonous tree I'm sure you know about right it's the most used thing in defense ever you get pulled over 20 pounds of cocaine and guns but the cop didn't have a valid reason to pull you over oops you can't it all gets thrown out right it's the same it's the same concept applied to fraudulent the fraudulent discovery materials being used in the initial competency things", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 4.16, "text": "Mapp versus Ohio and all of the fruit of the poisonous tree I'm sure you know about right" }, { "start": 4.16, "end": 9.52, "text": "it's the most used thing in defense ever you get pulled over 20 pounds of cocaine and guns but the" }, { "start": 9.52, "end": 13.0, "text": "cop didn't have a valid reason to pull you over oops you can't it all gets thrown out right" }, { "start": 13.0, "end": 18.64, "text": "it's the same it's the same concept applied to fraudulent the fraudulent discovery materials" }, { "start": 18.64, "end": 21.44, "text": "being used in the initial competency things" } ] }, "049": { "file": "049__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 6.251, "segment_count": 3, "full_text": "Yeah, so you're telling me to get out of this loop. I need to participate in it. I'm telling you that the loop should have never existed in the first place.", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 2.38, "text": "Yeah, so you're telling me to get out of this loop." }, { "start": 2.44, "end": 3.54, "text": "I need to participate in it." }, { "start": 3.58, "end": 6.12, "text": "I'm telling you that the loop should have never existed in the first place." } ] }, "050": { "file": "050__2025-11-18", "duration_seconds": 52.907, "segment_count": 10, "full_text": "I technically still haven't gotten I still haven't been provided with authentic discovery and I have that's also digital forensic proof because that's that's also just as solid as saying the document was has a create date after it was e-filed because no one can produce the like it's it's all logically mapped out now they're they're stuck right they can't produce the photos because they squished them so they're they were they weren't squished they were squished they it's so they're stuck so now I just don't get any discovery right I got the discovery I'm saying it's fraudulent and then now it's like oh well if we want to if we want to deal with that fraud we have to go through this the same loop you've been trying to escape the entire time that shouldn't have existed in the first place because it was based on this fraudulent discovery as I can prove right so the whole chain the don't all the dominoes knock knock knock", "transcript": [ { "start": 0.0, "end": 5.6, "text": "I technically still haven't gotten I still haven't been provided with authentic discovery" }, { "start": 6.24, "end": 11.2, "text": "and I have that's also digital forensic proof because that's that's also just as solid as saying" }, { "start": 11.2, "end": 18.0, "text": "the document was has a create date after it was e-filed because no one can produce the like it's" }, { "start": 18.0, "end": 23.04, "text": "it's all logically mapped out now they're they're stuck right they can't produce the photos because" }, { "start": 23.04, "end": 28.0, "text": "they squished them so they're they were they weren't squished they were squished they it's" }, { "start": 28.0, "end": 33.84, "text": "so they're stuck so now I just don't get any discovery right I got the discovery I'm saying" }, { "start": 33.84, "end": 38.24, "text": "it's fraudulent and then now it's like oh well if we want to if we want to deal with that fraud" }, { "start": 38.24, "end": 42.16, "text": "we have to go through this the same loop you've been trying to escape the entire time that shouldn't" }, { "start": 42.16, "end": 47.76, "text": "have existed in the first place because it was based on this fraudulent discovery as I can prove" }, { "start": 47.76, "end": 55.6, "text": "right so the whole chain the don't all the dominoes knock knock knock" } ] } } }