answer: #Person2# tells #Person1# the athlete didn't win because he had drug problems and was disqualified. #Person1# thinks that there's never a good reason to take drugs and #Person2# agrees.
documents: #Person1#: What happened? Why didn't he win?
  #Person2#: Didn't you hear? He was disqualified.
  #Person1#: How did that happen? He's so talented! I thought he had a great chance of winning a gold medal!
  #Person2#: If he didn't have any drug problems, he would have won.
  #Person1#: What? What kind of drugs was he using?
  #Person2#: He was taking steroids to make him stronger and faster.
  #Person1#: I thought that all athletes were supposed to be regularly tested for drugs.
  #Person2#: They are. The only reason they didn't disqualify him until after the race is because the results from the text only came back afterwards.
  #Person1#: That's so disappointing. I don't know why top athletes would feel the need to take drugs.
  #Person2#: I don't think it's right, but I can understand why they might. Imagine how much pressure there would be to win for your country!
  #Person1#: Regardless of how much pressure you're under, there's never a good reason to take drugs.
  #Person2#: I agree. Hopefully with the new regulations, fewer athletes will try to cheat with drugs.
  #Person1#: Let's hope so.