answer: #Person1# got a response letter for #Person2# because Bradford Films might not have #Person2#'s address and sent it to the department head. The letter reads that there was a copy of the agenda but #Person2# doesn't find it. #Person1# suggests #Person2# giving them another call.
documents: #Person1#: Did you see the letter I got from Bradford Films? They sent it in response to your phone call last week.
  #Person2#: If they wanted to say something about my call last week, why didn't they sand it to me?
  #Person1#: I guess they must not have your contact information, so they sent it addressed in care of your department head. Anyhow, they wrote to confirm in writing what you discussed about the Milton contract.
  #Person2#: Can I see it for a second?
  #Person1#: Sure, here it is. . .
  #Person2#: Dear Mr. Clark, Further to our telephone call last Friday, I am writing to confirm our meeting on july 21. As we discusses, our meeting is to review the contract details.
  #Person1#: Did they ask you to send the files beforehand?
  #Person2#: Let's see, ' we would e grateful if you could please send related materials to our office prior to our meeting. ' It looks like. . . hey, was there anything else sent along with this letter?
  #Person1#: I don't think so, why do you ask?
  #Person2#: The letter reads, ' please find enclosed a copy of our agenda for your review. ' I don't see anything else in the envelope. . .
  #Person1#: Maybe they forgot to attach it to the letter. You should give them another call.