answer: #Person1# and #Person2# talk about financial information. #Person1# thinks The Wall Street Journal does the best job of checking facts while #Person2# likes reading Fortune. #Person1# thinks a broadcast company usually does more but #Person2# also mentions its hazards.
documents: #Person1#: Millions of amateur investors like you, have to rely on a dizzying array of financial newspapers, magazines and commentators to get investment information.
  #Person2#: Yes. It's sometimes scary if you think of the tremendous amount of media we face every day.
  #Person1#: It's like information overload, not to mention the reliability of these papers and magazines.
  #Person2#: Which financial magazines and newspapers do you think do the best job of checking facts?
  #Person1#: Well, for example, The Wall Street Journal is very, very good. Even though it's used on occasion ( as all news organizations are ) by Ces or bankers who leak their mergers in advance in order to get a positive spin.
  #Person2#: I like to read Fortune.
  #Person1#: Good. Fortune is usually ahead of the curve. And Business Week is very solid, too.
  #Person2#: Where does a broadcast company get most of their information? I hope it's not just from press releases.
  #Person1#: A good broadcast company usually does far more than press releases. Their people go out and do real reporting, talking to people at the stock exchange, fund managers, analysts, etc.
  #Person2#: But sometimes when a flimsy report, or even a rumor gets on television, there's going to be a terrible'echo chamber'effect.
  #Person1#: You are right about that.