id
stringlengths
6
43
group_id
stringlengths
4
41
text
stringlengths
22
95
label
stringclasses
2 values
source
stringclasses
2 values
review_status
stringclasses
1 value
language
stringclasses
1 value
length_bucket
stringclasses
1 value
position
stringclasses
1 value
slice
stringlengths
9
22
candidate_set
stringclasses
1 value
partition
stringclasses
1 value
settled_outcome_candidate
bool
2 classes
outcome_pattern
stringclasses
13 values
rationale
stringlengths
54
83
⌀
context-pattern-16-narrow-exception-1
context-pattern-16-narrow-exception
We approved a one-time exception to redact personal identifiers from the register.
DECISION_EXPRESSED
assistant-authored-synthetic; user-provided-context-log-patterns
human-review-pending
en
short
standalone
narrow_exception
context-patterns-v1
train
true
exception
An approved scoped exception is settled; discussion is not approval.
context-pattern-16-narrow-exception-0
context-pattern-16-narrow-exception
A one-time exception to redact personal identifiers is under discussion.
NO_DECISION_EXPRESSED
assistant-authored-synthetic; user-provided-context-log-patterns
human-review-pending
en
short
standalone
narrow_exception
context-patterns-v1
train
false
no_expressed_choice
An approved scoped exception is settled; discussion is not approval.
context-pattern-17-preserve-boundary-1
context-pattern-17-preserve-boundary
We agreed to waive the stale-link check while retaining the separate privacy review.
DECISION_EXPRESSED
assistant-authored-synthetic; user-provided-context-log-patterns
human-review-pending
en
short
standalone
preserve_boundary
context-patterns-v1
train
true
policy
The first adopts an exception boundary; the second only explains a distinction.
context-pattern-17-preserve-boundary-0
context-pattern-17-preserve-boundary
Waiving the stale-link check does not automatically waive the privacy review.
NO_DECISION_EXPRESSED
assistant-authored-synthetic; user-provided-context-log-patterns
human-review-pending
en
short
standalone
preserve_boundary
context-patterns-v1
train
false
no_expressed_choice
The first adopts an exception boundary; the second only explains a distinction.
context-pattern-18-evidence-gate-1
context-pattern-18-evidence-gate
We decided to require a controlled trial before committing to the new backend.
DECISION_EXPRESSED
assistant-authored-synthetic; user-provided-context-log-patterns
human-review-pending
en
short
standalone
evidence_gate
context-patterns-v1
train
true
policy
An adopted gate is a decision even though the backend choice remains open.
context-pattern-18-evidence-gate-0
context-pattern-18-evidence-gate
A controlled trial would help us assess the new backend.
NO_DECISION_EXPRESSED
assistant-authored-synthetic; user-provided-context-log-patterns
human-review-pending
en
short
standalone
evidence_gate
context-patterns-v1
train
false
no_expressed_choice
An adopted gate is a decision even though the backend choice remains open.
context-pattern-19-measurement-controls-1
context-pattern-19-measurement-controls
We agreed to hold the evaluation settings fixed across both candidate runs.
DECISION_EXPRESSED
assistant-authored-synthetic; user-provided-context-log-patterns
human-review-pending
en
short
standalone
measurement_controls
context-patterns-v1
train
true
experiment
Chosen experimental controls differ from a reported confound.
context-pattern-19-measurement-controls-0
context-pattern-19-measurement-controls
The evaluation settings differed across both candidate runs.
NO_DECISION_EXPRESSED
assistant-authored-synthetic; user-provided-context-log-patterns
human-review-pending
en
short
standalone
measurement_controls
context-patterns-v1
train
false
no_expressed_choice
Chosen experimental controls differ from a reported confound.
context-pattern-20-quality-gate-1
context-pattern-20-quality-gate
We selected agreement with the reference labels as the release criterion.
DECISION_EXPRESSED
assistant-authored-synthetic; user-provided-context-log-patterns
human-review-pending
en
short
standalone
quality_gate
context-patterns-v1
train
true
policy
An adopted criterion counts; a measured result alone does not.
context-pattern-20-quality-gate-0
context-pattern-20-quality-gate
The latest run agreed with most of the reference labels.
NO_DECISION_EXPRESSED
assistant-authored-synthetic; user-provided-context-log-patterns
human-review-pending
en
short
standalone
quality_gate
context-patterns-v1
train
false
no_expressed_choice
An adopted criterion counts; a measured result alone does not.
context-pattern-21-reported-decision-1
context-pattern-21-reported-decision
The review group chose to keep the original interface after comparing the alternatives.
DECISION_EXPRESSED
assistant-authored-synthetic; user-provided-context-log-patterns
human-review-pending
en
short
standalone
reported_decision
context-patterns-v1
train
true
reported_choice
Reported choices count; conducting a comparison does not establish an outcome.
context-pattern-21-reported-decision-0
context-pattern-21-reported-decision
The review group compared the original interface with the alternatives.
NO_DECISION_EXPRESSED
assistant-authored-synthetic; user-provided-context-log-patterns
human-review-pending
en
short
standalone
reported_decision
context-patterns-v1
train
false
no_expressed_choice
Reported choices count; conducting a comparison does not establish an outcome.
context-pattern-22-quotation-trap-1
context-pattern-22-quotation-trap
After the review, we decided to keep the public interface unchanged.
DECISION_EXPRESSED
assistant-authored-synthetic; user-provided-context-log-patterns
human-review-pending
en
short
standalone
quotation_trap
context-patterns-v1
train
true
quotation
Affirming a decision differs from mentioning its wording as an example.
context-pattern-22-quotation-trap-0
context-pattern-22-quotation-trap
The handbook uses "we decided to keep the public interface unchanged" as an example sentence.
NO_DECISION_EXPRESSED
assistant-authored-synthetic; user-provided-context-log-patterns
human-review-pending
en
short
standalone
quotation_trap
context-patterns-v1
train
false
no_expressed_choice
Affirming a decision differs from mentioning its wording as an example.
context-pattern-23-process-read-1
context-pattern-23-process-read
I will read the draft next and then summarize the open questions.
DECISION_EXPRESSED
assistant-authored-synthetic; user-provided-context-log-patterns
human-review-pending
en
short
standalone
process_read
context-patterns-v1
train
false
process_intention
A firm process intention is positive under the broad pilot; a request is negative.
context-pattern-23-process-read-0
context-pattern-23-process-read
Could you read the draft next and summarize the open questions?
NO_DECISION_EXPRESSED
assistant-authored-synthetic; user-provided-context-log-patterns
human-review-pending
en
short
standalone
process_read
context-patterns-v1
train
false
no_expressed_choice
A firm process intention is positive under the broad pilot; a request is negative.
context-pattern-24-process-run-1
context-pattern-24-process-run
I commit to running the comparison this afternoon and reporting what I find.
DECISION_EXPRESSED
assistant-authored-synthetic; user-provided-context-log-patterns
human-review-pending
en
short
standalone
process_run
context-patterns-v1
train
false
process_intention
A process commitment counts under the broad pilot; usefulness alone does not.
context-pattern-24-process-run-0
context-pattern-24-process-run
Running the comparison this afternoon would be useful.
NO_DECISION_EXPRESSED
assistant-authored-synthetic; user-provided-context-log-patterns
human-review-pending
en
short
standalone
process_run
context-patterns-v1
train
false
no_expressed_choice
A process commitment counts under the broad pilot; usefulness alone does not.