duration_ms
int64
833
99.9k
label
stringlengths
1
1.06k
name
stringlengths
50
254
WavPath
stringlengths
50
254
audio
audioduration (s)
0.77
99.9
1,781
well i stand by my statements
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00200.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00200.flac
5,252
i will happily send you the emails that i have exchanged over the last three months
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00201.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00201.flac
4,187
i know that you were in a meeting with me when i spoke with kevin
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00202.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00202.flac
4,283
i know that selectman davelas was also in a meeting with me
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00203.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00203.flac
8,396
and i believe it was at that meeting where kevin told us that he would issue the letter that week and that he understood the deadline
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00204.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00204.flac
9,038
i mean we discussed what would happen in the crisis situation and what if anything we should be doing to protect the town from that crisis
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00205.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00205.flac
3,790
and it was six weeks ago which wasn't a lot of time
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00206.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00206.flac
3,398
and we talked about that but we did talk about it
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00207.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00207.flac
2,187
he did make commitments you were both there
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00208.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00208.flac
3,611
if i'm wrong please tell me because i'm not trying to throw him under the bus
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00209.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00209.flac
5,370
what i am trying to do though is let you know that this group has been working very very diligently
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00210.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00210.flac
6,299
this group has been very very focused on the potential crisis that could result if we miss a deadline
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00211.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00211.flac
6,106
i personally made kevin aware that we don't want to be in that situation
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00212.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00212.flac
2,756
we collectively don't want to be in a crisis situation
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00213.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00213.flac
4,993
we want to have this insurance issue resolved as early in the process as possible
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00214.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00214.flac
2,098
and we didn't we haven't
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00215.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00215.flac
6,048
we're sitting here today on the 27th of june in crisis mode and it didn't have to be that way
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00216.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00216.flac
5,016
but i will send dick gelerman the emails that i have and hopefully he'll provide them with you
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00217.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00217.flac
8,823
but i really do go back to that meeting we had in may that you were both at and we did talk about this issue and we did talk about what needed to be done
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00218.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00218.flac
6,262
and kevin did make commitments to all of us that he would do the authorization letter at a minimum
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00219.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00219.flac
6,483
if he had done it back then we would have had the proposals very very you know a week later ten days later
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00220.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00220.flac
3,471
we would have probably had this meeting in early june
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00221.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00221.flac
7,197
we would have decided upon a particular insurance course of action and we would never have the crisis that we have right now
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00222.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00222.flac
3,728
and that's not throwing someone under the bus but that is a statement of fact
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00223.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00223.flac
2,583
and it is about accountability
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00224.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00224.flac
2,476
tim you wanna yeah again caution the board
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00225.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00225.flac
4,230
and then i understand kevin's not here the meeting that we were at
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00226.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00226.flac
3,992
and please understand kevin is working from the time he's meeting with you on your issue
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00227.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00227.flac
8,224
he's also meeting with meyers he's meeting with the dealing with the weldnerdutton case and he's looking at the town as a whole
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00228.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00228.flac
6,760
so to jump out of that meeting and says that he's gonna do something without considering all the other facets that he's dealing with
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00229.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00229.flac
6,150
again if kevin's not here i just wish we get off this subject and focus on today is the 27th
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00230.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00230.flac
9,675
we've got an event on the 6th all this stuff i'm sure is gonna fall out one way or the other cause nobody wants to be in crisis mode
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00231.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00231.flac
5,208
but if we're gonna focus for the next hour on whose fault it was this is a little bit of uncharted territory
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00232.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00232.flac
4,800
we've got class action suit we've got a stadium with events coming up
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00233.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00233.flac
7,663
and if we don't start working together and stop pointing the fingers especially when a 3rd party is not here we're gonna be spinning a lot of wheels right now
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00234.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00234.flac
6,363
so if we want to get this thing resolved for an event next saturday let's talk about what our options are
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00235.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00235.flac
6,148
now we've spoken about you know individual claims versus claims in aggregate
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00236.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00236.flac
13,200
if there's different options out there and if we can get maybe the good news about that it's crisis mode is people work extra diligently because there's a deadline in a couple of days versus a couple months
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00237.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00237.flac
2,774
we've got to work together on this starting tonight
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00238.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00238.flac
4,413
and if we don't i mean basically we have one day it was the day after the 4th of july
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00239.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00239.flac
2,423
i don't even know who the heck's gonna be here that day
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00240.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00240.flac
8,595
so if we don't leave this room tonight with some type of a consensus i wouldn't be too comfortable about saturday on the 6th so
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00241.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00241.flac
1,371
sean
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00242.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00242.flac
1,420
yeah two questions
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00243.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00243.flac
7,544
one is you had mentioned that the insurance company mentioned that they would prefer to have one policy
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00244.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00244.flac
13,345
is that the way this is going or are we going to have an overlay policy on our existing policy it's going toward one law enforcement policy covering the town townwide as well as at the stadium
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00245.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00245.flac
6,599
and to go back to mark's statement you know if the stadium weren't here foxborough would just be a sleepy town in the boston suburbs
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00246.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00246.flac
3,667
with the stadium here we have these issues
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00247.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00247.flac
14,871
is there an instrument out there that the insurance companies may provide that could cap our liability to a reasonable level because as you mentioned even at the seven thousand five hundred there's still no limit and you take a look at it
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00248.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00248.flac
25,422
and if we were not to prevail in this class action suit we're still open to a substantial amount of payment which the town would have to bear so it's reinsurance okay maybe that's the term but if there's a reinsurance policy that could be an umbrella over the top that could potentially limit our liability i think we'd ...
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00249.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00249.flac
1,333
if i may jim
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00250.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00250.flac
7,095
over the past six months i've actually had the opportunity to learn a lot more about this particular type of insurance than i ever had any interest in learning
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00251.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00251.flac
2,290
and what i've learned is basically the following
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00252.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00252.flac
6,883
every municipality with a police force buys this law enforcement professional liability insurance
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00253.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00253.flac
4,073
and there are a lot of different ways to buy the insurance
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00254.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00254.flac
3,608
the mia policy that you buy is one way
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00255.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00255.flac
5,402
and what i mean by one way your deductible is based upon a per claimant
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00256.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00256.flac
4,123
so every the weldnerdutton case is a wonderful example
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00257.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00257.flac
5,149
every person who was wrongly placed into protective custody has a potential claim for you
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00258.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00258.flac
5,679
and the first seven thousand five hundred of each one of those claims is for your account not for the insurer's account
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00259.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00259.flac
1,689
so that's one way to do this
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00260.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00260.flac
11,170
another way to do it and i actually have a copy of a policy here that's also in place in massachusetts and used by a lot of municipalities is to do it on a per wrongful event basis
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00261.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00261.flac
18,803
and if that were the case in if that policy were in place when the weldnerdutton claimants came into being what would happen is each one of those people would be part of the same wrongful event and they would all fall within the deductible
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00262.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00262.flac
19,630
and the deductibles on those policies are generally speaking and once again i'm a lawyer not an insurance consultant but what i've learned over the last six months is the deductibles on those per wrongful event policies are usually twenty five thousand to fifty thousand and obviously higher deductibles generally result...
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00263.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00263.flac
5,571
there are a lot of variants on those but those are in general the ways to do it
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00264.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00264.flac
18,911
and so municipalities that have a concern about overall exposure as you just expressed they like to go for the per wrongful event where you have a cap and then they decide how much of a premium tolerance they have and they decide whether to buy a twenty five thousand cap or a fifty thousand cap
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00265.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00265.flac
17,313
i understand further that mia has been evolving their law enforcement coverage to a higher deductible that you have had the good fortune of keeping the lower deductible for an extended period of time
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00266.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00266.flac
2,936
and you know that's part of what's going on here
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00267.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00267.flac
4,940
there a little bit of an anachronism going on with respect to your policy to your benefit
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00268.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00268.flac
11,105
but i think the alternatives that we will be able to get will show you that spectrum and you'll be able to choose where on the risk premium spectrum you want to be
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00269.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00269.flac
16,789
and i will also offer the gratuitous comment that when i first looked at your policy i thought that i would personally prefer to have the per wrongful event coverage because i like the catastrophic protection that you get in that circumstance
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00270.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00270.flac
7,538
you know when you have a fifty thousand wrongful event coverage you're not ever looking at millions of dollars of exposure
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00271.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00271.flac
10,633
you may be looking at more nuisances that you prefer not to deal with but you never get into a situation like weldnerdutton or where you suddenly have potentially a million dollars of exposure
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00272.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00272.flac
2,529
jim i'm all set thanks
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00273.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00273.flac
12,561
mark do you have anything to add if i may to try to address your issue mr gray the per person cap the per person deductible
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00274.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00274.flac
11,169
i'm not sure whether there is a mechanism but i have heard of insurers that have said there is a per person deductible but up to a maximum deductible
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00275.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00275.flac
7,088
so whether it's five persons or ten claimants i've heard of insurers that do that
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00276.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00276.flac
8,907
i don't know whether that is an option under the mia policy or under the policies of any of the other insurers that attorney cobery is speaking to
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00277.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00277.flac
6,087
wrongful events i'm aware that gl policies have per occurrence limits
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00278.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00278.flac
3,359
professional liabilities have wrongful events limits
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00279.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00279.flac
8,794
and i can appreciate that that can be for the catastrophic loss a better protection for someone or an insured like the town of foxborough
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00280.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00280.flac
7,319
i think we have to appreciate here that at least with respect to the weldnerdutton case the claimants there are four currently four plaintiffs
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00281.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00281.flac
9,026
counsel for the four plaintiffs has said that there may be in excess of two thousand seven hundred and they're talking about more than just one event
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00282.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00282.flac
5,286
so they're talking about the bruce springsteen concert the country fest events patriots games
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00283.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00283.flac
6,826
so i'm not quite sure how many when they say two thousand seven hundred i'm not quite sure how many events they're talking about
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00284.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00284.flac
6,813
the higher deductible i appreciate that the mia contract right now is at seven thousand five hundred
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00285.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00285.flac
13,825
my understanding was that the rationale for increasing it to fifty thousand was that the protection that both the town and mia thought was in place wasn't turned out not to be in place
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00286.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00286.flac
8,787
so that's why it's going up to fifty thousand and it was conditioned upon that it would stay at seven thousand five hundred if alternative insurance was in place
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00287.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00287.flac
17,660
and i don't know to get to what whether it makes more sense frankly to eliminate the mia law enforcement policy entirely or have it as excess law enforcement coverage over whatever the other alternative policy is
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00288.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00288.flac
3,056
i don't know trying to find out what the mechanics would be
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00289.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00289.flac
1,865
right right right
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00290.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00290.flac
19,445
so potentially you could structure it that if the town re kept that existing law enforcement policy in place that that could apply to all town related events and then this other policy could strictly cover stadiumrelated events i would think so
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00291.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00291.flac
15,765
i mean i'm not an insurance consultant as well but i always thought that there could be a way to define stadium event in such a way that the new policy covers the stadium events and the mia policy covers nonstadium events
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00292.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00292.flac
5,778
i think that sounds like the cleanest and they agree to a common definition so that nothing falls through the cracks
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00293.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00293.flac
2,525
right okay thank you
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00294.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00294.flac
9,237
anybody else on the board at this point bob anything to add i'm just sensitive to the timeframe as jim already mentioned
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00295.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00295.flac
4,459
we have very few days to try to apply for a policy
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00296.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00296.flac
4,280
understand that's the beginning of the process correct yes
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00297.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00297.flac
10,721
and you know tomorrow's friday you get the weekend and then you have 4th of july on thursday and you would need to plan another meeting on the 5th
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00298.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00298.flac
4,879
on the 5th so just i won't be in town on the 5th
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00299.flac
20130627BOS/20130627BOS/2013_06_27BOS_DOT_flac_00299.flac