| """Checks that decide whether a build may be published. |
| |
| Splits are the risky half. A wrong ratio does not raise -- it rescales a |
| company's whole per-share history by a factor of two and the result still looks |
| like a price series. So the checks are about the ratios being declared ones, |
| the factors composing consistently, and the inferred set not drifting away from |
| the tagged set that validates it. |
| """ |
|
|
| from __future__ import annotations |
|
|
| import json |
| from dataclasses import dataclass, field |
| from datetime import UTC, datetime |
| from pathlib import Path |
| from typing import Any |
|
|
| import polars as pl |
|
|
| from .splits import KNOWN_RATIOS |
| from .store import read_table |
|
|
| MIN_DIVIDEND_FILERS = 2_000 |
| MIN_SPLIT_FILERS = 800 |
| |
| |
| |
| MIN_METHOD_AGREEMENT = 0.65 |
|
|
|
|
| @dataclass |
| class QualityReport: |
| errors: list[str] = field(default_factory=list) |
| warnings: list[str] = field(default_factory=list) |
| metrics: dict[str, Any] = field(default_factory=dict) |
|
|
| def error(self, message: str) -> None: |
| self.errors.append(message) |
|
|
| def warn(self, message: str) -> None: |
| self.warnings.append(message) |
|
|
| def metric(self, name: str, value: Any) -> None: |
| self.metrics[name] = value |
|
|
| @property |
| def ok(self) -> bool: |
| return not self.errors |
|
|
| def as_dict(self) -> dict[str, Any]: |
| return { |
| "ok": self.ok, |
| "generated_at": datetime.now(UTC).isoformat(), |
| "errors": self.errors, |
| "warnings": self.warnings, |
| "metrics": self.metrics, |
| } |
|
|
| def write(self, path: Path) -> None: |
| path.parent.mkdir(parents=True, exist_ok=True) |
| path.write_text(json.dumps(self.as_dict(), indent=2, default=str), encoding="utf-8") |
|
|
|
|
| def validate(data_dir: Path) -> QualityReport: |
| report = QualityReport() |
| data_dir = Path(data_dir) |
| dividends = read_table(data_dir, "dividends").collect() |
| splits = read_table(data_dir, "splits").collect() |
| factors = read_table(data_dir, "adjustment_factors").collect() |
| pit = read_table(data_dir, "pit").collect() |
|
|
| for name, frame in (("dividends", dividends), ("splits", splits), |
| ("adjustment_factors", factors), ("pit", pit)): |
| report.metric(f"rows_{name}", frame.height) |
|
|
| if dividends.is_empty(): |
| report.error("dividends table is empty") |
| return report |
|
|
| filers = dividends["cik"].n_unique() |
| report.metric("dividend_filers", filers) |
| if filers < MIN_DIVIDEND_FILERS: |
| report.error(f"only {filers} filers pay dividends, below the {MIN_DIVIDEND_FILERS} floor") |
| negative = dividends.filter(pl.col("amount_per_share") < 0).height |
| if negative: |
| report.error(f"dividends: {negative} negative amounts per share") |
| report.metric( |
| "dividends_by_kind", |
| {r["kind"]: r["n"] for r in dividends.group_by("kind").agg(pl.len().alias("n")).iter_rows(named=True)}, |
| ) |
| report.metric( |
| "dividend_subsequent_events", |
| dividends.filter(pl.col("is_subsequent_event")).height, |
| ) |
| restated = dividends.filter(pl.col("revision") > 1).height |
| report.metric("dividend_restated_rows", restated) |
|
|
| if splits.is_empty(): |
| report.error("splits table is empty") |
| return report |
|
|
| split_filers = splits["cik"].n_unique() |
| report.metric("split_filers", split_filers) |
| report.metric( |
| "splits_by_method", |
| {r["method"]: r["n"] for r in splits.group_by("method").agg(pl.len().alias("n")).iter_rows(named=True)}, |
| ) |
| report.metric( |
| "splits_by_confidence", |
| {r["confidence"]: r["n"] for r in splits.group_by("confidence").agg(pl.len().alias("n")).iter_rows(named=True)}, |
| ) |
| if split_filers < MIN_SPLIT_FILERS: |
| report.error(f"only {split_filers} filers have a split, below the {MIN_SPLIT_FILERS} floor") |
|
|
| |
| |
| allowed = [ratio for ratio, _label in KNOWN_RATIOS] |
| stray = splits.filter(~pl.col("ratio").is_in(allowed)).height |
| if stray: |
| report.error(f"splits: {stray} rows carry a ratio that is not a declared one") |
| if splits.filter(pl.col("detected_before") < pl.col("detected_after")).height: |
| report.error("splits: detection windows that end before they start") |
|
|
| |
| |
| strong = splits.filter(pl.col("confidence").is_in(["high", "medium"])) |
| both = strong.filter(pl.col("corroborated_by") == "xbrl_tag+eps_restatement")["cik"].n_unique() |
| tagged_filers = strong.filter(pl.col("method") == "xbrl_tag")["cik"].n_unique() |
| if tagged_filers: |
| agreement = both / tagged_filers |
| report.metric("method_agreement", round(agreement, 4)) |
| if agreement < MIN_METHOD_AGREEMENT: |
| report.error( |
| f"the inferred and tagged methods agree for {agreement:.1%} of tagged filers, " |
| f"below the {MIN_METHOD_AGREEMENT:.0%} floor" |
| ) |
|
|
| if not factors.is_empty(): |
| report.metric("factor_filers", factors["cik"].n_unique()) |
| if factors.filter(pl.col("cumulative_split_factor") <= 0).height: |
| report.error("adjustment_factors: non-positive factor") |
| |
| |
| |
| latest = factors.filter(pl.col("valid_to").is_null()) |
| wrong = latest.filter(pl.col("cumulative_split_factor") != 1.0).height |
| if wrong: |
| report.error(f"adjustment_factors: {wrong} filers whose current factor is not 1.0") |
| report.metric("factor_max", float(factors["cumulative_split_factor"].max())) |
|
|
| if not pit.is_empty(): |
| for column in ("entity_id", "event_date", "knowledge_date"): |
| if pit[column].null_count(): |
| report.error(f"pit.{column}: {pit[column].null_count()} nulls") |
| report.metric( |
| "pit_by_action", |
| {r["action_type"]: r["n"] for r in pit.group_by("action_type").agg(pl.len().alias("n")).iter_rows(named=True)}, |
| ) |
| return report |
|
|
|
|
| __all__ = ["QualityReport", "validate"] |
|
|