text:
Meeting date: Thursday, April 19, 2018
Meeting of the Parliament 19 April 2018
Agenda: General Question Time, First Minister’s Question Time, Royal Air Force (Centenary), Safe Injection Facilities, Decision Time
- General Question Time
- First Minister’s Question Time
- Royal Air Force (Centenary)
- Safe Injection Facilities
- Decision Time
First Minister’s Question Time
No representative of the Scottish Conservative Party or consultant who works for it has ever met the disgraced data-harvesting company Cambridge Analytica or its parent company. [Interruption.] The Scottish National Party does not like it, but, if the question was good enough for Ian Blackford to ask at Prime Minister’s questions, it is good enough for me to ask at First Minister’s question time. Can the First Minister say the same about the Scottish Government and the SNP?
As we said earlier this week, a consultant who was working for the SNP met Cambridge Analytica in February 2016. However, the SNP has never worked with Cambridge Analytica. We have never hired the company or paid it any money to do any work for us, which is surely the fundamental point.
In spite of what Ruth Davidson has said, I am not sure whether the Conservative Party as a whole—or, indeed, the United Kingdom Conservative Government—can say the same. We know that the links between Cambridge Analytica and its parent company, Strategic Communication Laboratories, are legion. For example, a former chairman of Oxford West and Abingdon Conservative Association used to run SCL, and there are reports that he is now the chief executive officer of Cambridge Analytica. Furthermore, SCL’s founding chairman was a former Tory MP, and a director of the company donated more than £700,000 to the Conservative Party.
The UK Government has reportedly had a close working relationship with SCL. The Ministry of Defence paid the company £200,000 for carrying out two separate projects. According to The Guardian, SCL Group was granted by the Ministry of Defence what is called list X status, which means that it can access secret documents. The MOD also paid more than £40,000 to a branch of SCL for data analytics. It has been reported—I can say only what has been reported—that a Cambridge Analytica executive advised the Foreign and Commonwealth Office on lessons that were gleaned from the Trump election campaign. We also know that Alexander Nix, who is the former CEO of Cambridge Analytica, claimed in a letter to, I think, a foreign Government back in 2010 that he had worked with the UK Conservative Party.
I can say two things categorically: the SNP has never worked with Cambridge Analytica, and the Scottish Government has never worked with Cambridge Analytica. I am not sure whether the Conservative Party or the UK Government can say the same.
If the First Minister had bothered to listen to my first question, she would know that the party that I am in charge of has never held any meetings or had any contact with Cambridge Analytica.
Let us get back to the party that she is in charge of, and let us review what we have found out this week. A former Cambridge Analytica director revealed that the SNP had, indeed, met the firm. I know that the SNP has raised sanctimony to an art form, but what stinks here is the reek of hypocrisy. When it comes to the dealings that others have had with Cambridge Analytica, the First Minister and her party have spent weeks demanding full transparency. However, when it comes to the SNP, it took a whistleblower giving evidence to a parliamentary committee before facts began to be dragged out into the open.
The First Minister has demanded full transparency of others but, hand on heart, can she really say that the SNP has shown it this week?
I think that Ruth Davidson has missed something, because Alexander Nix, the former chief executive officer of Cambridge Analytica, told a Westminster committee—not this week, but in February—in response to a question about companies pitching for work:
“It is not uncommon for us to go and speak to political parties. Indeed, in this country I think I have spoken with every political party ... Labour, Liberal Democrats, UKIP, SNP, Conservatives”.
Therefore, Cambridge Analytica has pitched to every political party.
The SNP has been very clear in saying that Cambridge Analytica tried to sell us its services—as I said, that was in the early part of 2016, when a meeting took place. However, back then, before any of the concerns that we are talking about now had come to light, the SNP decided that it was not a company that we wanted to work with. We judged Cambridge Analytica to be “a bunch of cowboys”. If the UK Government had done that, it might not have some of the links that I have read out.
But, First Minister, it was not the UK Conservative Party that was caught out spreading allegations about others—that was all on you.
Let us put the First Minister’s commitment to transparency to the test. Yesterday, she was asked directly when the meeting—or meetings—took place and who attended them, and her party’s leader at Westminster was asked likewise. She failed to answer, and he claims that he never knew. We have got a little bit further today, so let us get answers to those questions. Who was the SNP consultant who held a meeting with Cambridge Analytica? When in February did the meeting take place? Where did it take place? Those are very simple questions for someone who is committed to full transparency.
If Ruth Davidson had listened, she would have heard me say that the meeting took place in February 2016. I am not going to name somebody who was working as a consultant for the SNP, because they have done nothing wrong. There has been no wrongdoing. I am here to answer questions on behalf of the Scottish Government, but I am happy to answer questions on behalf of the SNP. I am the leader of the party, and I am not going to name somebody who was working on behalf of the SNP and who has done nothing wrong in order that a witch hunt can be carried out.
Given that we are talking about transparency, perhaps Ruth Davidson can answer some of the points about the connection between the Conservative Party and Cambridge Analytica. She says that the Conservatives have not done a range of things, but we know—certainly, it has been reported—that the Conservative Party has accepted donations from a director of the parent company of Cambridge Analytica. Does Ruth Davidson think that that is okay?
I will mention another connection that is perhaps closer to home for Ruth Davidson. Another company that is reported to have very close links with Cambridge Analytica is Aggregate IQ. We should remember that it was the Constitutional Research Council—a group run by a former vice-chairman of the Scottish Conservative Party—that gave a donation to the Democratic Unionist Party’s Brexit campaign. We still do not know the source of that donation, but we know that some of it was spent on Aggregate IQ, which has links with Cambridge Analytica.
If Ruth Davidson wants to be transparent, will she tell us the source of the donation that was procured by a former vice-chairman of the Scottish Tory party? I think that it is the Conservative Party and the UK Government that are mired in links to Cambridge Analytica and its various associates. The SNP has never done any work with them because, unlike the Conservatives and the UK Government, when we met them, we realised that they were “a bunch of cowboys”. If only Ruth Davidson’s colleagues had done the same.
Let us get back to questions to the First Minister. Transparency SNP-style is to fling out allegations at opponents, fail to set out your own record, deny that you know anything about it and, when you are caught out, give half-answers to legitimate questions. The First Minister says that she has been up front and transparent, but, given everything that the SNP has done over the past month, including keeping its Westminster leader in the dark, to the rest of us it just looks pretty shifty.
Ruth Davidson has said that all the links that I read out between those companies and the Conservative Party or the UK Government are allegations. I challenge her, when she has had the opportunity to review the Official Report, to come back and tell me which of the links that I have set out between her colleagues and those companies are untrue.
With regard to the SNP, let us cut to the chase and get to the nub of the matter. Yes, two years ago, before the concerns that we are talking about now had come to light, somebody had a meeting with Cambridge Analytica on behalf of the SNP. We decided that we did not want to do any work with the company. As a result, we have never hired it, we have never paid it any money and it has never done any work for the SNP or the Scottish Government. The same cannot be said of the UK Government, and I do not know for sure whether the same can be said of the Conservative Party.
Ruth Davidson started her last question by saying, “Let’s get back to First Minister’s questions.” Well, let us get back to the responsibilities of the First Minister and the Scottish Government. Here are some of the things that Ruth Davidson could have come to the chamber and asked me about today. She could have asked me about the work to save BiFab. She could have asked me about the extra money that was announced yesterday for farmers, to help them with the impact of recent weather. She could have asked me about the extra money for the initiative to combat domestic abuse that was announced this week. She could have asked me about the update report on getting broadband to households across the country. She could have asked me about the major expansion of childcare training places that has been announced in the past few days. However, because Ruth Davidson does not have a leg to stand on with regard to any of those issues, all that she can do is come to the chamber and spread baseless smears.
I think that it is the Conservative Party and the UK Government that have questions to answer, and I look forward to her response with regard to which of the links that I set out is not true.
I recognise the level of political interest in the subject, so I will let the matter go in this case. However, we should try to stick to the First Minister’s responsibilities at First Minister’s question time—that goes for both sides.
NHS Tayside (Finances)
This morning, the Auditor General told Parliament’s Public Audit and Post-legislative Scrutiny Committee that repeated warnings about the finances of NHS Tayside were not taken seriously. Is the Auditor General wrong?
I do not think that it is the case that the Scottish Government has not worked hard to support NHS Tayside. I heard the Auditor General—I think that this is the comment that Richard Leonard is referring to—refer to a statement, from a previous report, about use of endowment funds. There was certainly a line in one of the previous reports recording the fact of the transfer of endowment funds. The point that the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Sport has made, and which I make again today, is that at no point was that flagged up to the Scottish Government as a concern. If it had been, action would have been taken at that time.
The health secretary has exercised her ministerial power, for the right reasons and in the right way, to make sure that the leadership of NHS Tayside is strengthened, and so that it can go on delivering high-quality patient care while undertaking the necessary transformation in its services.
Richard Leonard has at least come to the chamber with a genuine, serious and legitimate issue that is within the responsibilities of the First Minister. However, whatever our differences of opinion about the matter, I hope that he will support the action that the health secretary has rightly taken.
The situation at NHS Tayside did not come as a surprise to anyone who was paying attention. Year after year, the health board sought bail-outs, year after year Audit Scotland warned that that was not sustainable, and year after year the Scottish Government has been in denial about the scale of the problem.
Between repaying loans, repaying the endowment fund and finding other efficiency savings, NHS Tayside now needs to make more than £200 million of cuts over the next five years. Does the First Minister agree that that will mean even longer waiting times and even more cancelled operations for the people of Tayside?
No, I do not agree. The purpose of the Scottish Government providing brokerage is to ensure that patient services are not affected as the board undertakes its transformation plans.
I also do not agree with Richard Leonard’s characterisation of the Scottish Government’s role. There have been issues in Tayside for some time: let me run through the steps that the Scottish Government and the health secretary have taken.
When the five-year transformation plan was launched in 2015-16, the Scottish Government put in place specific support arrangements. In March 2017, it appointed Professor Lewis Ritchie to chair an assurance and advisory group. In June 2017, when Lewis Ritchie produced his first report, the Scottish Government established a transformation support team to provide intensive support for the board between July and December 2017. In February this year, we had the second report of the assurance and advisory group. Shortly after that, the issue of e-health funding came to light. At that point, Grant Thornton UK LLP was appointed by the health secretary to look into that in detail. That report has been published for Parliament. Since the issue of the endowment fund came to light, the health secretary has, of course, taken action.
At every stage, there has been support for NHS Tayside, but when issues culminated as they did, the health secretary rightly decided that the leadership of the board required to be strengthened. That is why steps have been taken in the past two weeks.
None of the steps that have been taken have worked. A health board is raiding charity funds to pay the bills—and that is after fiddling the accounts. What makes it even worse is that that is all happening in Tayside, under the nose of the health secretary, who is the member of the Scottish Parliament for Dundee City East. It is too late for Shona Robison to be an honest broker in the NHS Tayside affair. Will the First Minister reflect on that and face up to the fact that the time has come for her health secretary to go?
I will continue to give my support, as First Minister, to the job that the health secretary is doing to strengthen the leadership of the NHS Tayside board with the new chief executive and chair that have been put in place, and to ensure that that board has support in undertaking the transformation that it needs to undertake. That is what we will continue to focus on.
In the final analysis, it is services to patients that are important. Actually, NHS Tayside provides a very high level of patient service, and our job—the health secretary’s and mine—is to ensure that it continues to do that. I say with the greatest respect to Richard Leonard that that is what the health secretary and I will continue to focus on.
There are a number of supplementaries.
Out-of-hours General Practitioner Services (Fife)
“Monday the 9th of April marked the first time in Glenrothes’s 70 year history that there was no GP on duty at night caring for the town.”
Those are the words of Dr Bob Grant, who is a retired local general practitioner. Fife’s health and social care partnership’s decision to close out-of-hours provision means that people from Glenrothes, Dunfermline and St Andrews are now being made to travel to Kirkcaldy. Does the First Minister share my concerns about the complete absence of public consultation, the costs that that will place on individuals who do not have access to a vehicle, and the resource burden that that move directly forces on staff at the Victoria hospital in Kirkcaldy?
I thank Jenny Gilruth for raising an important local issue.
Recent changes to the out-of-hours primary care services in Fife are a short-term measure to ensure that appropriate levels of patient safety are maintained. I understand that a public consultation on a full range of longer-term options, including maintaining services at the existing four out-of-hours centres, will begin in June. Of course, overnight primary care emergency services will still be available at Victoria hospital in Kirkcaldy. I encourage not just Jenny Gilruth and other Fife members but the local population in Fife to ensure that they make their views known in that public consultation, when it starts.
Mossmorran Ethylene Plant
Last night, the Scottish Environment Protection Agency issued a final warning to the operators of the Mossmorran ethylene plant, almost a year after surrounding communities were kept awake for days by noise and light pollution caused by flaring. There have been even more incidents of illegal flaring in recent months. What is the First Minister’s definition of a final warning?
SEPA is an independent regulatory body, and it is for it to set out what actions it will take when warnings that it issues are not complied with. We have discussed the issue in the chamber before, and I absolutely understand the concerns of local people about Mossmorran and the issues that have caused those concerns.
However, it is absolutely right and proper that SEPA is the organisation that takes the matter forward. I will happily ask it to write directly to Mark Ruskell to set out clearly what its further actions will be, should it deem that Mossmorran has not complied with any conditions that it has set out.
The First Minister will be aware of the case of Olya Merry, who was ordered to leave the United Kingdom by the Home Office, despite being married to a Scottish citizen and having a Scottish daughter. Olya and her family, who are in the gallery today, are delighted that interventions by the Cabinet Secretary for Culture, Tourism and External Affairs and local politicians have led to the Home Office’s decision being paused for review.
Will the First Minister confirm that the Scottish Government will continue to put pressure on the UK Government to ensure that Olya is permitted to remain permanently at her home in Coatbridge with her husband and daughter? Will she also confirm that the Scottish Government will continue to demand the devolution of immigration law, so that Scottish citizens are not affected in a similar way in the future?
First, I welcome the Merry family to the gallery. I am sure that the whole Parliament will also want to welcome them.
Fiona Hyslop raised the case with the Home Secretary last week. We will continue to make appropriate representations in order to give the Merry family the peace of mind that they require about the right of Mrs Merry to remain permanently in Coatbridge with her husband and daughter.
This case, and the appalling treatment of the children of the Windrush generation that has come to light this week, demonstrate more clearly than has perhaps been the case previously that we urgently need a humane immigration system across the whole UK, and not the hostile environment that Theresa May has been so keen to put in place. We need a system that respects human dignity, that recognises individual circumstances and which does not focus on arbitrarily cutting numbers and unjustly forcing people to leave the country that they have come to call home. That is the sort of humane immigration policy that I want to see in place. We will continue to argue very loudly and clearly for that.
West Glasgow Ambulatory Care Hospital Minor Injury Unit
This morning, I received a press release—I believe that it will be issued to the press this afternoon—informing me that the minor injury unit at the Yorkhill hospital will close tomorrow, and that the service will return to the Queen Elizabeth university hospital. That came as a surprise to me; it will be a surprise to my constituents who took part in a consultation and were absolutely sure that the minor injury unit would not go to the former Southern general hospital.
Does the First Minister agree that a press release is not the way to inform elected members or their constituents about such matters? Will she contact Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board to convene a meeting about where in the west of the city of Glasgow the MIU will be based?
First, I am happy to look into how the public information has been communicated. If what Sandra White has outlined is correct—I have no reason to believe that it is not—it strikes me that that is an unacceptable way for the health board to have done it. I am happy to ask the health board to communicate directly with Sandra White.
On the substantive issue of service provision, which is an important one in the city of Glasgow, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde reopened the west Glasgow minor injury unit at Yorkhill from early January as part of its plan to manage winter pressures. The timeframe was extended to cover the Easter holiday period.
The Cabinet Secretary for Health and Sport has made it clear that she expects Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board to ensure that the west of the city has appropriate unscheduled care provision, and I know that the board will soon consider proposals for plans to provide such local services. The health secretary will continue to monitor the progress of that work and provide updates. I will make sure that a message goes to Greater Glasgow and Clyde NHS Board to ask it to contact Sandra White directly.
Perinatal Mental Health Services
A report issued this morning has found that new mothers in half of Scotland cannot access specialist life-saving mental health services. The Maternal Mental Health Alliance says that there is no specialist provision in Tayside, Fife, Dumfries and Galloway, the Western Isles, Orkney or Shetland; only Glasgow meets the required standards in the whole of the country. The First Minister was warned about the situation three years ago, so why is the Government failing mothers and their children?
This is an extremely important issue, and we have taken the step of funding a national managed clinical network on perinatal mental health. As I am sure that Willie Rennie is aware, the MCN brings together specialists in perinatal mental health, nursing, maternity and infant mental health and is designed to improve the treatment of perinatal mental healthcare.
The network is delivering a work plan, which includes assessing provision across all levels of service delivery. The report to which Willie Rennie refers should be taken into account in that. The network is also looking at how it ensures that all women, their children and their families have equity of access to the perinatal mental health services that they need. The work is on-going, and I am happy to provide Willie Rennie with more detail about that and to answer any further questions from him as a result of that further information.
The managed clinical network is a good thing, but it is far from enough. The institutes and the alliance have identified where the gaps in services are. The Government is not doing enough quickly enough. The Royal College of Midwives is scathing about the Government’s record. It says that the consequences of poor services can be fatal. We should not forget that the tragedy of suicide is the leading cause of maternal deaths. Where is the six-week check? Where are the community networks? Why does Scotland lag behind England?
I ask the First Minister about mental health almost every single week in the Parliament and this week is yet another week when we hear of a new report on failures of the Government’s mental health policy. One week, it is young people waiting an age for treatment. The next week, it is adults. Now it is mothers. Is it not the case that mental health is fast becoming this Government’s record of shame?
Willie Rennie asks regularly about mental health and I give him great credit for doing so, because it is an extremely serious issue. However, every week when he asks me, I outline the work that the Scottish Government is doing to address the issues and concerns that have been raised. I guess that it is easy for him to dismiss the managed clinical network as important but not enough, but the work that that network is doing will enable us to address the specific concerns.
The report that has been published today provides further evidence and information that will be very helpful in the work that the MCN is doing. I know, for example, that one of the things that the report calls for—perhaps not surprisingly—is more prioritised funding, which we will consider seriously. In that respect, it is looking particularly at community services.
I have set out in summary the work that the network is doing around its work plan. That work will take forward the actions that address the concerns that Willie Rennie is raising.
I have absolutely no issue with Willie Rennie raising these issues; I encourage members to continue to raise them. However, I also ask and hope that members will appreciate that the range of work that is being done—whether about young people, perinatal mental health or other aspects of mental health provision—under the auspices of our mental health strategy, which was recently praised by the World Health Organization on a recent visit to Scotland, is specifically addressing these important concerns.
Social Security (Scotland) Bill (Terminal Illness)
Just weeks after Gordon Aikman’s death, with his grieving family in the gallery, the Cabinet Secretary for Health and Sport promised a fast-tracked benefit system. She said that she would end the injustice of terminally ill people waiting months for their benefits—and I believed her.
Yesterday, the Scottish Government lodged amendment 111 to the Social Security (Scotland) Bill, the intention of which is to keep the failing system just as it is, reversing changes that were agreed to at stage 2. Given that Marie Curie has described that as very disappointing and that more than 50 leading doctors have expressed their deep concern in today’s edition of The Times, will the First Minister please intervene to ensure that people with less than two years to live get the benefits that they so desperately need?
I will take a bit of time to address this issue properly, because it is a serious one. I spent much of this morning discussing this very issue with the Minister for Social Security in advance of stage 3 of the Social Security (Scotland) Bill, which will take place next week. It is a difficult and sensitive issue and I am sure that Kezia Dugdale would recognise that it is also a complex one. I am sure that all MSPs on the Social Security Committee who have been scrutinising the bill would recognise that. I make it clear that the Government and the Minister for Social Security will continue to listen and discuss the best way forward on this right up to the stage 3 votes next week.
On the time limits, the change from two years, which was amended in at stage 2 of the bill, to six months relates to the difficulties that, according to some clinicians, there are in accurately diagnosing life expectancy over a period as long as two years. However, that is not the fundamental point in this. The fundamental point that I want to make, which I think is alluded to in the open letter that was published today, is that if we have a time limit that is the only basis for determining eligibility, whether that time limit is six months, two years or whatever, we will always have the risk of excluding people who should be included, because time limits, by their nature, are arbitrary.
That is why the most important part of the Scottish Government’s amendment is the second part, whose effect would be that there will be no hard or rigidly applied timeframe. That means that, for somebody who would not be able to fulfil the six-month timeframe requirement, a medical practitioner would still be able to certify their eligibility. Clinicians will still be able to use their judgment on a case-by-case basis. That is the important thing here.
In the discussions that I had with Jeane Freeman this morning, we were talking about how to get away from time limits and focus more on clinical judgment. We will continue to have discussions with anyone who is interested in the issue right up to the final stage of the bill. It is a difficult, sensitive and complex issue. I hope that all members recognise that it is not a party-political issue but one that we all desperately want to get right. I give a commitment today that we will do our best to get it right, because that is what we all want.
NHS Highland (Contracts)
Given Audit Scotland’s report on contracts in NHS Highland, which found that contracts were informal, long running without review, unaudited and not documented, and given the sums of money involved, can the First Minister confirm whether the Scottish Government has complete confidence in the management of NHS Highland? Given NHS Highland’s annual overspend, could the matter be another example of incompetent governance?
I understand that the report that Mr Mountain refers to relates to the provision of two contracts in NHS Highland: one is for healthcare at the Nairn medical practice and the other is for the carrying out of vasectomies across the Highlands. The report states that the contracts date from 1998. It raises issues of procurement. NHS Highland has already said that it is taking the required action to implement the recommendations and will monitor that via its own audit committee.
I expect all health boards to follow relevant procurement regulations to ensure the best use of resources. We have been clear that we expect NHS Highland to address the issues that are raised in the audit report and to fully implement its recommendations—as NHS Highland has already said that it will do.
Clyde Shipyards (Contracts)
In 2013, the unionist parties warned us that Scottish shipyards would lose out on contracts to build Royal Navy ships if Scotland were outside the United Kingdom. However, the Westminster Tory Government is now encouraging overseas shipyards to compete for the latest billion-pound order. Work from that order would create and secure up to 6,500 jobs. Will the First Minister back calls for that work to come to the Clyde?
Yes, I will. That work should be on the Clyde, I argue that that work was promised to the Clyde and should definitely go to the Clyde. We should be very clear. What we are now seeing develop around that work and the future of the shipyards is nothing short of a blatant betrayal of Scottish shipyards. During the referendum, promises were made to those shipyards by the Tories, and indeed, by all the unionist parties—the shipyards were told of promises of work for years to come. The unionist parties specifically said that, if Scotland became independent, it would not be able to secure that work for the Clyde, because contracts could not go to “foreign countries”. It is an absolute betrayal and I hope that we will hear all parties across the Parliament stand up for shipbuilding on the Clyde.
Syrian Refugees (Resettlement)
I remind members that I am a parliamentary liaison officer to the First Minister.
To ask the First Minister how many Syrian refugees have been resettled in Scotland. (S5F-02247)
Scotland has welcomed around 2,150 people under the Syrian resettlement programme since October 2015. We remain committed to welcoming refugees seeking sanctuary from the conflict in Syria and because of that refugees continue to arrive. I hope that they all receive a warm welcome in Scotland.
The Syrian community in Scotland will be worried about the current situation in Syria and particularly worried about their family and friends who remain in the country. My thoughts are with them.
I emphasise that Scotland will continue to provide a home for people who are fleeing war and persecution. We are committed to welcoming as many as we can of those who arrive in the United Kingdom during 2018.
As well as warmly welcoming those from Syria who have made Scotland their home, I would like to take the opportunity to pay tribute to all those organisations that have supported those who are settling into communities across Scotland, including the services provided by Multi-Cultural Family Base in Leith, in my constituency.
Like many others, I think that we should celebrate the positive impact of the resettlement programme in Scotland, but I am also concerned about the welfare of asylum seekers from Syria who are living here outwith that programme and who therefore do not receive adequate support from the Home Office as regards both funding and assistance to settle into communities. Does the First Minister agree that the Home Office must look again at what support it provides to asylum seekers, improve the support that is provided and treat everyone equally?
Yes, I agree very strongly with that. First, I thank local authorities and all organisations that have played their part in welcoming those who have come under the Syrian resettlement programme. Just before Christmas, I attended an event at the Convention of Scottish Local Authorities at which we celebrated the work that had been done to make sure that that welcome was as warm as it has been.
However, that should apply not just to those who come through the resettlement programme but to everybody who seeks asylum in our country. We believe very strongly that integration begins from day 1 of arrival and not just when people have been granted refugee status. The support that the UK Government provides under the Syrian resettlement programme is very good and very welcome, but that also serves to highlight the gulf between it and the minimal support that is provided for asylum seekers. Indeed, it creates a two-tier system. I encourage the UK Government to extend the model of holistic support that we see as part of the resettlement programme and to fund the integration of asylum seekers to give them an equal chance to rebuild their lives here and fulfil the potential that they and their families have.
Last week, in a feeble and misguided attempt to look strong and stable, the UK Government engaged in military action in Syria, on the basis of flimsy evidence, without waiting for the findings of an independent inquiry and at the behest of a presidential tweet. Such action risks increasing the flow of refugees from that war-torn country. Does the First Minister agree that the UK Government needs to do far more to facilitate the arrival of refugees in this country than it has done so far?
That is important because, regardless of anybody’s views on the air strikes that took place last weekend—and there will be differing views in the community at large and, indeed, the Syrian community in Scotland about the efficacy and the rights and wrongs of air strikes—they underline the importance of making sure that we welcome those who are fleeing the conflict in Syria. I have said before, and I will say again, that, for all that the UK Government does good work there, it could do much more.
All of us are appalled by the actions of the Assad regime. If it were to be the case—and I have no difficulty in believing that he is capable of doing so—that he launched chemical weapons attacks against his own population, all of us would be appalled by that. The question is how best to deal with it. My view, which has been borne out by experience, is that isolated air strikes do not help to resolve the underlying situation in Syria. As the United Nations secretary general has said, there is no military solution to the situation and we need to get back to finding a political one. I hope that that is now the priority of all the countries that are involved.
Recent escalations in the Syrian conflict have displaced more people from their homes and only compounded the refugee crisis. Will the First Minister confirm whether the Scottish Government-owned Prestwick airport was used by the United States military in its recent air campaign, which will only serve to compound the conflict?
Look, we have discussed the issue of Prestwick airport, the commercial nature of what it does and the fact that what it does as regards military flights is no different to what it has done all along. As far as the Syrian conflict is concerned, there are two issues. I will not repeat what I have said about my views on air strikes. What all of us need to do is get back to a situation in which the Geneva political process in Syria is given priority. Fundamentally, we need to see a long-term, sustainable political settlement to the situation in Syria. All of us—many greater than those of us in this chamber—have a part to play in encouraging that process.
Sport and Physical Activity (Participation)
To ask the First Minister, in light of Scotland’s success at the Commonwealth games, what the Scottish Government is doing to ensure that there is opportunity for all to participate in sport and physical activity, from grass-roots to elite sport. (S5F-02225)
First, I am sure that—perhaps rarely—everybody will join in agreement when I take this opportunity to congratulate everyone who is involved with Team Scotland on achieving its best-ever away games by winning an amazing 44 medals, which beats the previous medal tally for an overseas games of 29 in Melbourne in 2006. The efforts of not just our athletes but everybody in Team Scotland, their support teams and their families have been absolutely incredible. I want to place on record my congratulations to each and every one of them. They demonstrate that Scottish sport is growing in strength and depth, with Sport Scotland and our governing bodies developing talent in our athletes, and coaching and support staff.
That success does not happen by accident; it comes through sustained investment in and commitment to our whole sporting system. We have created opportunities through the active schools programme, community sports hubs and a comprehensive range of performance and national performance centres. All of that is enabling more people of all ages and backgrounds to regularly take part in sport and physical activity, from grass roots to high-performance level.
I associate myself with the First Minister’s comments on the amazing efforts of our athletes and I take the opportunity to recognise the governing bodies, clubs, coaches and volunteers across the country whose relentless hard work has been instrumental in delivering that success. Does the First Minister agree that success at elite level helps to drive participation, but that that can happen only if there is accessible opportunity? Does she also agree that opening up the school estate for extracurricular and out-of-school activities and aligning those activities with those of local sports clubs is an initiative that would help to deliver sustainable participation?
Yes, I agree with that, and much of that is already happening. Of course, with some private finance initiative schools, some of which were built under previous Tory Governments, there are restrictions on opening up sports facilities in that way. However, we are doing a number of things. We are protecting sportscotland’s budget, we have exceeded our aim of creating 150 community sports hubs as part of the Glasgow Commonwealth games legacy and of course we have been investing in a range of national performance centres, with Oriam in Edinburgh being one of the shining examples.
I agree with the thrust of the question that high-performance success helps to drive and inspire performance generally, which is why we will continue to ensure that our funding and support span mass participation as well as providing more targeted support for our most talented athletes.
I, too, associate myself with the First Minister’s remarks regarding the success of medallists and all who represented Scotland, but there is a “but”. The Government’s final evaluation report on the Glasgow Commonwealth games in 2014, which was published this month, states:
“hosting a major event is not, in and of itself, likely to have an automatic, positive impact on population levels of sports participation and physical activity.”
So not even hosting an event makes a mark. Given the increase in obesity, even in pre-school children, is the First Minister satisfied that the appropriate balance is being struck between elite funding and the humble, but I would suggest more pressing, provision of funding to encourage exercise—I stress the word “exercise”—at a very basic level?
Christine Grahame raises an important issue. That balance will always be important and, inevitably, it will not always be easy to strike. I certainly agree that simply hosting a major event will not deliver benefits, and we have never argued that. We have to work hard to get those benefits, which is what we have been doing since Glasgow 2014, and we will continue to do that during and after the European championships that will take place in Glasgow this summer.
However, we also invest heavily in community activity and sport. For example, on physical education in schools, through our active schools programme, between 2012 and 2016, we invested nearly £12 million in supporting schools to meet our PE commitment, and we have seen massive improvement in that respect. We are also doubling investment in active travel.
We are actually seeing an increase in the number of people taking part in sport, and many of our governing bodies are seeing rises in participation. For example, Scottish Athletics has experienced a 49 per cent increase in athletics club members since 2011; Scottish Swimming has had an increase of 25 per cent; and Scottish Cycling has had an increase of 12 per cent. The number of children meeting the guidelines on physical activity has increased from 71 per cent in 2008 to 76 per cent in 2016.
There is more work to do and we will always need to take care to get that balance right. It is important that we invest in community activity, but it is also important that we invest to give our most talented athletes the best chance possible of going to major competitions such as the Commonwealth games and coming home with medals.
“Local government in Scotland: Challenges and performance 2018”
To ask the First Minister what the Scottish Government’s response is to the recent Accounts Commission report, “Local government in Scotland: Challenges and performance 2018”. (S5F-02240)
We welcome the report, which makes a number of recommendations to help councils to meet the challenges that they face and emphasises the need for councils to develop new ways of working. For example, it says that councils should work with communities to understand their needs and to actively involve them in decision making, which are objectives that the Scottish Government has been promoting through our community empowerment agenda. I encourage all councils to consider the report carefully, as I am sure they are doing, and to take any necessary actions to implement its recommendations.
The First Minister must be worried, as I am, about what the report says about the critical state of local government finances and about the warning that councils are struggling to provide care for our older people. This is really serious. The First Minister has a mandate to govern Scotland for the next three years; does she have the courage to fix the funding and care crisis so that all older people in Scotland receive the care that they need and deserve?
That is what we are doing. We just agreed to a budget—I appreciate that Labour voted against the budget—that delivers a real-terms increase in the revenue budgets for local authorities. We are transferring resources from the national health service into social care, so that we not only build up social care services to help local authorities with what they do but help to relieve the pressure on the NHS. We are taking forward the extension of free personal care to under-65s. We have already taken forward plans to pay the living wage to people who work in our social care services.
We are getting on with that work day in, day out. It might be better if, instead of making constant requests for us to do more and then voting against budgets that we bring forward to do exactly that, Labour were occasionally to bring something more constructive to this chamber.
The First Minister will be aware that the Accounts Commission’s report expresses a number of concerns, not least about the threat that leaving the European Union poses to Scotland’s working-age population. Scotland’s projected population growth is entirely due to inward migration, so does the First Minister share the commission’s concern that leaving the EU could have an impact on the number of working-age people in Scotland, which would mean less money for public spending, through taxation?
Yes, I share that concern and I think that everyone in Scotland should share that concern. Our population continues to increase and is at a record high, but that growth has been driven by migration. The Fraser of Allander institute, too, has highlighted concerns about the impact of Brexit on migration and our long-term growth prospects.
It is clear that not only is United Kingdom policy on immigration inhumane, but it is harming Scotland’s economic interests. That is why this Parliament has backed our call for new powers so that the Scottish ministers can offer migration routes to people who want to make Scotland their home.


text:
Joy rides at the Christmas Fair, Worcester, UK
Ladies at a Christmas Market, Worcester, UK
Toffee treat preparation
Roast Chestnuts at a Christmas Market, Worcester, UK
Travelling to the wonderland exhibition by Xu Bing in the The Victoria and Albert Museum, London
Worcestershire Film Festival - second edition. A young and promising new festival in the heart of UK.
Close the door but open the window.

domain: artistic


text:
Buy Bitcoin Ira – Excitement About Crypto IRA
What Are Bitcoin IRAs? There is not a particular Internal Revenue Service (IRS) account designed for cryptocurrencies. Buy Bitcoin IRA. Therefore, when financiers refer to a “Bitcoin individual retirement account,” they are essentially referring to an individual retirement account that consists of Bitcoin or other digital currencies within its portfolio of holdings. Because 2014, the internal revenue service has considered Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies in pension as home, indicating coins are taxed in the exact same style as stocks and bonds.
Buy Bitcoin IRA. Both Bitcoin IRA and Bit, individual retirement account have actually offered discount rates to clients to promote their services. Self Directed Roth IRA Cryptocurrency. Even with discounts, nevertheless, the possibility of entering an unpredictable area riddled with frauds entirely at your own risk might not be an attractive one for the majority of financiers.
The 20-Second Trick For Crypto IRA Companies – Buy Bitcoin Ira
For tax purposes, the residential or commercial property aspect helps avoid Bitcoin financial investments from having to pay charges or other unique IRS tax charges.; a fortunate couple of saw $1 billion returns on their Bitcoin financial investments.
Ensure your account custodian has years of experience and can identify possible investment bubbles. They should likewise have the ability to quickly recognize trades that may break IRS regulations and trigger you to be punished. Buy Bitcoin IRA. Cryptocurrency Roth IRA. You may have an interest in our post,. A lot of people choose an SDIRA over a typical IRA for 2 reasons: As stated above, there are possibly high-returns that can be gotten through Bitcoin financial investments making it a perfect SDIRA financial investment chance.
Top Guidelines Of I Trust Crypto IRA
While a conventional SDIRA will allow you to invest in Bitcoins with pre-tax dollars, a Roth IRA may be the much better choice. What does this mean concerning Bitcoin investments?
A certified trusted custodian can help you with establishing an LLC and describing how it works for your account and satisfies your particular needs. For an SDIRA, the custodian is just an agent depended act exclusively on your instructions. You are the account owner and the one who makes all decisions regarding your SDIRA account. Crypto IRA Companies.
Buy Bitcoin Ira. The Ultimate Guide To Bitcoin IRA Fees
You need to make sure you look for a respectable, customized company, like Royal Legal Solutions, who will. If you need help, begin with our investor quiz and we’ll take it from there. Buy Bitcoin IRA. Your custodian can not provide financial direction however can help you to understand the policies and discuss anything you have questions about.
Overtime, laws may alter. If you are considering utilizing your Roth individual retirement account to purchase Bitcoins, employ a custodian who understand the subtleties of IRS regulations and Bitcoin trends.
Buy Bitcoin Ira – How I Trust Crypto IRA can Save You Time, Stress, and Money.
What’s a Bitcoin Roth IRA? There are different ways to make the most of cryptocurrencies, and potentially among the greatest ways is with a self-directed Bitcoin Roth individual retirement account. Buy Bitcoin IRA. A Bitcoin Roth individual retirement account on our platform lets people buy cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, and more. Advantages of Investing in Crypto with a Bitcoin Roth individual retirement account There are lots of advantages of Bitcoin Roth IRAs, likewise called cryptocurrency Roth IRAs, however among the main advantages is that they use substantial tax advantages that numerous other types of investment accounts don’t have – Bitcoin IRA Reviews.
Popular Cryptos to Invest In A Bitcoin Roth IRA While Bitcoin and Ethereum are the most popular cryptocurrencies, there are other digital properties that likewise have investing potential. A fascinating way Ethereum is different from Bitcoin is its capability of being set, permitting clever agreements, which are flexible self-created contracts. An example of wise contracts are loans without intermediaries like banks.
0, a significant upgrade in the system, is said to further boost security and give financiers a way to earn interest on Ethereum. Litecoin (LTC): Litecoin was made to compliment other cryptocurrencies, not replace them. It negotiates 4x quicker than Bitcoin and utilizes Seg, Wit to get rid of signature information from transactions.
Buy Bitcoin Ira – Top Guidelines Of Bitcoin IRA Reviews
The benefit of Bitcoin Money compared to Bitcoin is that its network negotiates far quicker, around 2 million deals daily.
Now, if you my own Bitcoin, and you desire to pay the taxes on that mining event by selling a portion of the Bitcoin at a revenue, you’ll now require to pay a 2nd tax (Bitcoin In IRA). Buy Bitcoin IRA. This time, it is available in the kind of capital gains tax on any appreciation in the worth of the Bitcoin between the time you mined (or came into ownership of) it and when you offered it.
Not known Details About Crypto In IRA – Buy Bitcoin Ira
If you own a conventional or Roth IRA, you can invest in almost anything, with the exception of life insurance and antiques, such as antiques. Employer-provided 401(k) and other retirement plans are more restrictive, however some enable you to trade private stocks and specialized funds (see More Choices in Your 401(k)) (Bitcoin IRA Reviews).
Buy Bitcoin IRA. (Significant IRA suppliers, such as Fidelity, Vanguard and Schwab, location restrictions on their customers’ financial investments.) Costs might be greater than you ‘d spend for a conventional IRA, and self-directed Individual retirement accounts have sometimes been pIRAted by monetary criminals to guide investors into fraudulent financial investments. Before buying a self-directed IRA, contact your state securities regulator and the Securities and Exchange Commission to see whether the provider or custodian has been the topic of any enforcement actions. Buy Bitcoin IRA.

domain: economics


text:
H.S. baseball: Barnegat downs Lakewood
A four-run fourth inning enabled Barnegat to break a tie and defeat Lakewood, 7-4, on Friday in its first game since it was announced by the NJSIAA that standout senior left-hander Jason Groome is ineligible because of a violation of the NJSIAA's transfer rules.
Groome is ineligible until either May 1 or Barnegat's 13th game of the season, whichever comes first. Barnegat's 13th game, barring no rainouts, is April 27 at home against Manchester.
He was declared ineligible because he transferred back to Barnegat from IMG Academy in Bradenton, Florida, without a bona fide change of address.
The Bengals (2-4, 2-4 in Shore Conference Class B South) had to forfeit wins against Point Boro and Central - games Groome pitched in.
Errors keyed a key part in the Bengals' fourth inning rally.
Max Ritner had a two-run double in the first for Barnegat.
Tyler Suydam pitched 5 2/3 innings and allowed four runs, two earned, on four hits, struck out four and walked two to pick up the win. Ryan Bush pitched 1 1/3 hitless innings with two strikeouts and one walk to earn the save.
Toms River South 2, Lacey 1: Junior shortstop Tom Campo's single to center in the bottom of the eighth scored senior left fielder Michael Conover with the winning run as the Indians (4-3, 4-2) defeated the Lions (2-3, 2-3) in a Class A South game.
Conover had also scored the tying run in the sixth on a single by Ben Montenegro. He was 2-for-3 and was hit by a pitch.
Junior left-hander Justin Fall pitched a complete-game five-hitter, struck out nine, walked two and made a game-saving play on a slow roller up the third base line with two out in the top of the seventh and the go-ahead run on third. He is now 3-0 on the season.
Don Zellman had an RBI single in the fifth for Lacey.
St. Rose 6, Mater Dei Prep 3: Brenden Hueth delivered two-out RBI single in the top of the sixth put the Purple Roses (5-0, 5-0) ahead to stay and Brody Maypother followed with a run-scoring double to center as St. Rose defeated the Seraphs (3-2, 3-2) and moved into a tie for first-place in Class B Central with Point Pleasant Beach,
Will Gannon and Mike Gowen added a run-scoring single and double respectively in the seventh.
John Crowley scatered eight hits in a complete-game performance to pick up his first varsity win.
Maypother was 2-for-3 with two doubles and Gowen was 2-for-3 with the double.
Red Bank 1, Monmouth 0: Matt Reardon had an RBI single in the top of the third and pitched two innings of one-hit relief to pick up the save and Josh Horowitz pitched three-hit ball over five innings as the Bucs (3-4) defeated the Falcons (4-3) in a nondivisional game.
Garrhet Reedy was 3-for-4 for Monmouth.
Manchester 12, Central 8: Ryan Vanderham went 3-for-4 with a walk, a double three RBI and scored three runs, Darrius Garcia went 3-for-5 with a double, three RBI and scored two runs and Steven Rodriguez was 2-for-4 with a double, a walk, two RBI and scored three runs as the Hawks (4-2, 4-2) defeated the Golden Eagles (4-3, 3-3) in a Class B South game.
Jack Sudia was 3-for-4 with a double and four RBI for Central.
Toms River East 3, Brick 0: Sophomore right-hander Nick Degennaro pitched a three-hitter and struck out six and walked none and Tyler Idzinski had a two-run triple with two out in the bottom of the first as Raiders (1-5, 1-5) defeated the Green Dragons (1-5, 1-5) in a Class A South game.
Keyport 8, Keansburg 4: Christian Smith pitched a four-hitter and struck out eight and walked two, an RBI single by Kenneth Harrigan gave the Red Raiders (2-3, 2-3) the lead for good and Jackson Aumack went 2-for-4 with an RBI and scored two runs as Keyport defeated the Titans (2-3, 2-3) in a Class B Central game.
Toms River North 12, Southern 1: Mike Nyisztor went 4-for-5, scored two runs and had two RBI, Joey Rose had a three-run homer and Dave Cordoma went 3-for-4 with three RBI as the Mariners (2-2, 2-2) defeated the Rams (3-4, 3-4) in a Class A South game.
Point Boro 12, Donovan Catholic 0: Frank Graziano pitched a five-inning one hitter and struck out four and walked none and went 2-for-4 with two RBI and Josiah Gliddon and Mark Leyble each had two-run homers as the Panthers (6-0, 6-0) defeated the Griffins (3-3, 3-3) in a Class B South game.
Ranney 15, Asbury Park 2: Freshman catcher Ryan Batista belted a grand slam in a seven-run fourth inning for his first varsity homer and Corey Natofsky allowed five hits and struck out seven and walked one in five innings as the Panthers (2-3, 2-3) defeated the Blue Bishops (0-5, 0-5) in a Class B Central game.

domain: sports


text:
I’m building some “8-bit” style sprites in Photoshop, and using the pen tool so that I can scale them for different resolutions.
The problem is that they are coming out anti-aliased, which I don’t want. Is there a way to turn off anti-aliasing with the Photoshop pen tool?
Once you have created each shape (I assume that’s what you’re doing — if not, that’s how you should do this so you can see what you’re doing) and scaled to taste, select its path using the Path Selection Tool (black arrow version).
Create a new, empty layer and Paste. You now have a duplicate of the path on a new raster layer and can hide the vector (shape) layer.
From the Paths panel flyout, select either “Fill Path” or “Stroke Path” and clear the “Anti-alias” checkbox.
Source : Link , Question Author : Kevin Whitaker , Answer Author : hitautodestruct


President Trump is seeking more than $75 million for work on the new Soo Lock project in Sault Ste. Marie. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers says the money would be used to start construction of the upstream approach walls, continue the design of the New Soo Lock chamber, and finish construction of the upstream channel deepening. The Corps tells us the upstream approach walls will stabilize the existing approach walls to allow for modern vessels to tie up and wait their turn to pass through the new lock. It’s anticipated the wall designs will be finished in late 2019, and the construction contract will be awarded in summer 2020. Army Corp Lieutenant Colonel Greg Turner says the appropriation keeps the project on track for completion in seven to ten years from the start of construction. You can find out more about the new Soo Lock project right here.


text:
Accreditation & Awards
Licensed for Community-based Services
Maine Behavioral Healthcare is licensed and accredited in Maine to provide an array of services offered to adults, adolescents and children challenged with mental health, developmental disorders, co-occurring and/or substance abuse issues. Our services include outpatient treatment, medication management, residential treatment, supported living, integrated care, psychosocial rehabilitation, intensive outpatient treatment, case management, and behavioral health home, among others.
Behavioral Health Accreditation for Hospital-based Services
We have hospital contracts with Southern Maine Health Care inpatient, Pen Bay Medical Center inpatient, Maine Medical Center outpatient psychiatry and the Maine Medical Center inpatient P6 Unit. These programs are all managed by Maine Behavioral Healthcare and accredited by the joint commission under the hospital contracts.
Spring Harbor Hospital is also accredited by the joint commission.

domain: medical


text:
When it comes to high-quality cookware, Staub and Le Creuset are two renowned brands that have gained immense popularity among home cooks and professional chefs alike. Both brands offer a wide range of kitchen essentials, including their iconic Dutch ovens. If you’re in the market for a versatile and durable Dutch oven, this article will guide you through the differences between Staub and Le Creuset, helping you make an informed decision. From design and performance to price and durability, we’ll explore various aspects of these cookware giants. Let’s dive in!
History and Heritage
- 1 History and Heritage
- 2 Construction and Design
- 3 Staub vs Le Creuset Dutch Oven: Materials Used
- 4 Heat Retention and Distribution
- 5 Cooking Performance
- 6 Lid Design and Features
- 7 Color Options and Aesthetics
- 8 Cleaning and Maintenance
- 9 Price Comparison
- 10 Durability and Warranty
- 11 Conclusion
- 12 Frequently Asked Questions
- 12.1 Are Staub and Le Creuset the same?
- 12.2 Are Staub and Le Creuset Dutch ovens oven-safe?
- 12.3 Can I use Staub and Le Creuset Dutch ovens on different stovetops?
- 12.4 Do Staub and Le Creuset offer a warranty for their Dutch ovens?
- 12.5 Can I use metal utensils with Staub and Le Creuset Dutch ovens?
- 12.6 Are Staub and Le Creuset Dutch ovens dishwasher-safe?
- 12.7 Does Staub scratch easily?
- 12.8 Is Staub lighter than Le Creuset?
Staub: A Legacy of Excellence
Staub, a company with a rich history, has been crafting exceptional cookware for over a century. Founded in 1974 by Francis Staub, the brand has its roots in the Alsace region of France. The company initially specialized in enameled cast iron cookware, which quickly gained recognition for its exceptional quality and performance.
Le Creuset: A Tradition of Craftsmanship
Le Creuset, another prominent name in the culinary world, has a heritage that dates back to 1925. Established in the small town of Fresnoy-le-Grand in France, Le Creuset has been synonymous with craftsmanship and innovation. The brand revolutionized the cookware industry by introducing colorful enameled cast iron cookware, which captivated home cooks and professional chefs alike.
Both Staub and Le Creuset have built a strong reputation for their commitment to excellence, craftsmanship, and tradition. Their legacies are deeply rooted in French culinary heritage, making them highly sought-after brands for discerning cooks around the globe.
Construction and Design
Staub: Innovative Engineering
Staub Dutch ovens are meticulously crafted using innovative engineering techniques. The cookware is made from durable cast iron, known for its excellent heat retention and distribution properties. The cast iron core ensures even cooking and heat retention for delicious, well-cooked meals. Staub’s Dutch ovens feature a tight-fitting lid that helps to seal in moisture and flavor during the cooking process.
Le Creuset: Timeless Elegance
Le Creuset Dutch ovens are renowned for their timeless elegance and impeccable design. The cookware is also constructed from premium quality cast iron, guaranteeing exceptional heat distribution. The Dutch ovens feature an enamel coating that not only adds a pop of color to your kitchen but also provides a smooth, easy-to-clean surface. Le Creuset’s Dutch ovens come with a well-fitted lid that helps to lock in moisture and enhance the flavors of your dishes.
Both Staub and Le Creuset prioritize the construction and design of their Dutch ovens to deliver cookware that not only performs exceptionally but also adds a touch of sophistication to your kitchen. Whether you prefer the innovative engineering of Staub or the timeless elegance of Le Creuset, both brands offer beautifully designed Dutch ovens that are a pleasure to cook with.
Staub vs Le Creuset Dutch Oven: Materials Used
Staub: The Enamel Expert
Staub Dutch ovens are crafted with meticulous attention to detail, using high-quality materials. The cookware features a durable cast iron construction that provides excellent heat retention and distribution. The interior of Staub Dutch ovens is coated with a smooth enamel finish, which not only prevents food from sticking but also makes cleaning a breeze. The enamel coating also enhances the oven’s resistance to rust and allows for the use of acidic ingredients without compromising the integrity of the cookware.
Le Creuset: The Pioneers of Cast Iron
Le Creuset Dutch ovens are also made with top-of-the-line materials to ensure superior performance. Like Staub, Le Creuset uses cast iron for the core of their Dutch ovens, providing excellent heat retention and even heat distribution. The cookware is coated with a vibrant, durable enamel that not only adds aesthetic appeal but also offers protection against staining and chipping. The smooth enamel interior of Le Creuset Dutch ovens is designed to resist sticking and allows for easy release of food.
Both Staub and Le Creuset prioritize the use of high-quality materials in their Dutch ovens. The cast iron construction ensures optimal heat retention and distribution, while the enamel coatings provide a non-stick surface and contribute to the durability and longevity of the cookware. Whether you choose Staub or Le Creuset, you can be confident that you’re investing in Dutch ovens crafted with premium materials that are built to withstand the test of time.
Heat Retention and Distribution
Staub: Superior Heat Retention
One of the standout features of Staub Dutch ovens is their exceptional heat retention capabilities. The cast iron construction of Staub cookware allows it to absorb and retain heat efficiently. This means that once the Dutch oven is heated, it maintains a consistent and even temperature throughout the cooking process. The superior heat retention of Staub Dutch ovens ensures that your dishes are cooked evenly and thoroughly, resulting in deliciously flavorful meals.
Le Creuset: Optimal Heat Distribution
Le Creuset Dutch ovens are also known for their outstanding heat distribution properties. The cast iron core of Le Creuset cookware enables it to distribute heat evenly across the cooking surface. This ensures that every part of your dish receives the same level of heat, promoting uniform cooking and preventing hot spots. The optimal heat distribution of Le Creuset Dutch ovens allows for precise control over cooking temperatures and helps to achieve excellent culinary results.
Both Staub and Le Creuset excel in heat retention and distribution, thanks to the use of high-quality cast iron in their Dutch ovens. Whether you prioritize superior heat retention like Staub or optimal heat distribution like Le Creuset, both brands deliver cookware that allows for precise and consistent cooking performance. With either choice, you can confidently create dishes with even heat distribution and outstanding flavor.
Staub: Culinary Excellence
Staub Dutch ovens are renowned for their exceptional cooking performance. The combination of superior heat retention and even heat distribution allows for precise control over cooking temperatures. Whether you’re braising, stewing, or slow-cooking, Staub Dutch ovens excel in delivering tender, flavorful results. The tight-fitting lid of Staub Dutch ovens helps to seal in moisture, ensuring that your dishes are moist and succulent. The self-basting spikes on the underside of the lid contribute to continuous basting, further enhancing the flavors of your culinary creations.
Le Creuset: Versatility at Its Best
Le Creuset Dutch ovens also offer outstanding cooking performance and versatility. With their optimal heat distribution, these Dutch ovens excel in a variety of cooking techniques. From simmering and sautéing to baking and roasting, Le Creuset Dutch ovens can handle it all. The well-fitted lid helps to retain moisture and flavors, resulting in deliciously cooked meals. Additionally, the ergonomic knob on the lid allows for easy handling and comfortable grip, adding to the overall convenience of cooking with Le Creuset Dutch ovens.
Both Staub and Le Creuset Dutch ovens are designed to deliver exceptional cooking performance. Whether you prioritize the self-basting spikes of Staub or the versatile cooking capabilities of Le Creuset, both brands offer cookware that enables you to create culinary masterpieces with ease. Whichever brand you choose, you can be confident in achieving outstanding cooking results that will impress both yourself and your guests.
Lid Design and Features
Staub: Self-Basting Spikes
Staub Dutch ovens feature a unique lid design with self-basting spikes. These spikes are strategically placed on the interior surface of the lid. As moisture evaporates during the cooking process, it condenses on the spikes and drips back down onto the food. This continuous basting action helps to enhance the flavors and keep your dishes moist and tender. The self-basting spikes are a distinctive feature of Staub Dutch ovens, adding to their exceptional cooking performance.
Le Creuset: Ergonomic Knob
Le Creuset Dutch ovens are equipped with an ergonomic lid knob that offers both functionality and style. The knob is designed for easy handling and a comfortable grip when lifting the lid. It stays cool to the touch, even when the Dutch oven is subjected to high temperatures. The ergonomic knob not only enhances the overall user experience but also adds a touch of elegance to the design of Le Creuset Dutch ovens.
Both Staub and Le Creuset pay attention to the design and functionality of the lids of their Dutch ovens. Whether you prefer the self-basting spikes of Staub or the ergonomic knob of Le Creuset, both brands offer lid features that contribute to the overall cooking experience. These thoughtful design elements add convenience, functionality, and aesthetic appeal to their respective Dutch ovens, making them a joy to use in the kitchen.
Color Options and Aesthetics
Staub: Vibrant and Unique
Staub Dutch ovens are known for their wide range of vibrant color options. The brand offers a diverse selection of hues, from classic and understated to bold and eye-catching. Whether you prefer the timeless elegance of traditional colors like cherry red or the modern flair of vibrant turquoise, Staub has a color option to suit every kitchen decor and personal style. The enamel coating on Staub Dutch ovens not only provides durability but also adds a beautiful glossy finish to the cookware.
Le Creuset: Classic and Timeless
Le Creuset Dutch ovens are synonymous with classic and timeless aesthetics. The brand offers a variety of iconic colors that have become synonymous with Le Creuset’s signature style. From the vibrant Flame orange to the sophisticated Marseille blue, Le Creuset’s color palette exudes elegance and sophistication. The enamel coating not only enhances the durability of the Dutch ovens but also adds a smooth and glossy finish, creating a visually appealing cookware piece for your kitchen.
Both Staub and Le Creuset understand the importance of aesthetics and offer a wide array of color options for their Dutch ovens. Whether you prefer the vibrant and unique colors of Staub or the classic and timeless hues of Le Creuset, both brands ensure that their Dutch ovens not only perform exceptionally but also add a touch of beauty to your kitchen. Choose the color that resonates with your style and enjoy cooking with a Dutch oven that reflects your personal taste.
Cleaning and Maintenance
Staub: Easy to Clean
Staub Dutch ovens are designed with ease of cleaning in mind. The smooth enamel coating on both the interior and exterior surfaces of the cookware makes it resistant to sticking, which helps to facilitate effortless cleanup. After cooking, simply allow the Dutch oven to cool down, and then wash it with warm soapy water and a non-abrasive sponge or cloth. Stubborn food residue can be soaked for a short period before gentle scrubbing. It is important to avoid using harsh abrasives or metal utensils that may damage the enamel coating. With proper care, Staub Dutch ovens can maintain their beautiful appearance and performance for years to come.
Le Creuset: Effortless Maintenance
Le Creuset Dutch ovens are also designed for easy cleaning and simple maintenance. The enamel coating on both the interior and exterior surfaces prevents food from sticking, making it easier to clean after use. To clean, allow the Dutch oven to cool, then wash it with warm water and a mild dish soap. Non-abrasive sponges or cloths should be used to avoid scratching the enamel. If there are any stubborn stains or food residues, you can soak the Dutch oven in warm soapy water for a short period before cleaning. Le Creuset Dutch ovens are dishwasher-safe, but hand washing is recommended to prolong their longevity and preserve their appearance.
Both Staub and Le Creuset prioritize easy cleaning and maintenance for their Dutch ovens. By following the recommended care instructions and using gentle cleaning methods, you can ensure that your Dutch oven remains in top condition. Regular cleaning and proper maintenance will not only keep your Dutch oven looking beautiful but also contribute to its longevity and continued cooking performance.
When it comes to comparing the prices of Staub and Le Creuset Dutch ovens, it’s important to consider the quality, craftsmanship, and reputation that both brands offer. While both brands are known for producing high-quality cookware, there can be variations in pricing based on factors such as size, design, and features. Here’s a general overview of the price ranges for Staub and Le Creuset Dutch ovens:
Staub: Staub Dutch ovens are often considered a premium brand, reflecting their exceptional craftsmanship and innovative features. The price range for Staub Dutch ovens can vary depending on the size and specific model you choose. Generally, Staub Dutch ovens start from around $200 and can go up to $500 or more for larger or specialty designs.
Le Creuset: Le Creuset Dutch ovens are also renowned for their quality and timeless design. The price range for Le Creuset Dutch ovens is comparable to Staub, with variations based on size and features. On average, Le Creuset Dutch ovens start from around $200 and can range up to $500 or more for larger or specialized options.
It’s important to note that prices may vary depending on the retailer, promotions, and specific models available. It’s recommended to compare prices from reputable retailers and consider any additional features or sets that may affect the overall price.
Ultimately, the decision between Staub and Le Creuset Dutch ovens should not solely be based on price but also on personal preferences, cooking needs, and the specific features that each brand offers. Both brands provide exceptional quality and performance, making them worthwhile investments for passionate home cooks and professional chefs alike.
Durability and Warranty
Staub and Le Creuset are renowned for their commitment to producing durable and long-lasting Dutch ovens. Let’s take a closer look at the durability and warranty offerings of both brands:
Staub: Sturdy and Built to Last
Staub Dutch ovens are known for their exceptional durability. Crafted from high-quality materials, including cast iron and enamel coating, Staub cookware is built to withstand the rigors of everyday cooking. The cast iron construction ensures strength and resilience, while the enamel coating provides protection against rust, chipping, and staining. With proper care and maintenance, Staub Dutch ovens can provide years of reliable performance in the kitchen.
In terms of warranty, Staub offers a limited lifetime warranty on its Dutch ovens. This warranty covers manufacturing defects and workmanship issues. It’s important to note that the warranty may vary depending on the region and the specific product. It’s recommended to review the warranty terms and conditions provided by Staub or consult with the retailer for more details.
Le Creuset: Timeless Durability
Le Creuset Dutch ovens are also renowned for their durability and longevity. Constructed from premium cast iron and coated with enamel, Le Creuset cookware is designed to withstand high heat and resist wear and tear. The enamel coating not only provides durability but also adds a layer of protection against stains and scratches. With proper care, Le Creuset Dutch ovens can maintain their beautiful appearance and performance over time.
Le Creuset offers a limited lifetime warranty on its Dutch ovens as well. The warranty covers manufacturing defects and craftsmanship issues. However, it’s essential to review the specific warranty terms and conditions provided by Le Creuset or consult with the retailer for comprehensive information.
Both Staub and Le Creuset prioritize durability in their Dutch ovens and stand behind the quality of their products. However, it’s crucial to handle and care for the Dutch ovens according to the manufacturers’ guidelines to ensure their longevity. Regular maintenance and avoiding harsh cleaning agents or utensils will help preserve the durability and performance of the cookware.
Before making a purchase, it’s recommended to review the warranty details and understand the terms and conditions specific to your region and the product you intend to buy. This will provide you with confidence in the durability and warranty coverage of your chosen Dutch oven.
In conclusion, both Staub and Le Creuset Dutch ovens are exceptional choices for any cooking enthusiast. Staub impresses with its innovative engineering, superior heat retention, and self-basting spikes, while Le Creuset stands out with its timeless elegance, optimal heat distribution, and ergonomic knob. The decision between the two ultimately comes down to personal preferences, cooking style, and budget. Regardless of your choice, you can rest assured that investing in either brand will elevate your culinary creations to new heights.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are Staub and Le Creuset the same?
Staub and Le Creuset are separate brands known for their high-quality Dutch ovens. While they share similarities in terms of material (cast iron) and enamel coating, they are distinct brands with their own unique features, designs, and aesthetics.
Are Staub and Le Creuset Dutch ovens oven-safe?
Yes, both Staub and Le Creuset Dutch ovens are oven-safe and can withstand high temperatures.
Can I use Staub and Le Creuset Dutch ovens on different stovetops?
Absolutely! Staub and Le Creuset Dutch ovens are compatible with all types of stovetops, including gas, electric, and induction.
Do Staub and Le Creuset offer a warranty for their Dutch ovens?
Yes, both brands provide warranties for their products, ensuring customer satisfaction and peace of mind.
Can I use metal utensils with Staub and Le Creuset Dutch ovens?
It is recommended to use wooden or silicone utensils to preserve the enamel coating of the Dutch ovens.
Are Staub and Le Creuset Dutch ovens dishwasher-safe?
While both brands claim that their Dutch ovens are dishwasher-safe, handwashing is recommended to maintain their longevity and appearance.
Does Staub scratch easily?
No, Staub Dutch ovens are designed to be resistant to scratching. The enamel coating on the interior and exterior surfaces helps protect the cookware from scratches and provides a smooth and durable finish. By following proper care and maintenance instructions, you can keep your Staub Dutch oven looking pristine for years to come.
Is Staub lighter than Le Creuset?
In general, Staub and Le Creuset Dutch ovens have a similar weight due to their cast iron construction. The weight of the Dutch ovens may vary depending on the specific size and design, but there is typically no significant difference in weight between Staub and Le Creuset.

domain: food


A century of Finnish state forestry 1859-1959.
This paper is a short presentation in English of the activities of the Finnish Forest Service, organization responsible for the management of the State Forests of Finland, during its first century. The article gives a short history of the Forest Service and description of the forest property, development of the Forest Service, forest conservation work and business activity of the organization.
A complete presentation of the history and activities of the organization since its establishment in 1859 up to the present time is published in Finnish in Silva Fennica No. 107.
Published in 1961


text:
Only 300 copies available.
The soundtrack to story-driven platformer Timespinner is getting a limited release on vinyl.
Music label Yetee Records has announced it will be selling the soundtrack, composed by Jeff Ball, on its online store from 26th February.
The music varies in style and is inspired by the game composers of the ’90s such as Michiru Yamane (of Castlevania: Symphony of the Night) and Yasunori Mitsuda (of Chrono Trigger and Chrono Cross).
This vinyl release is a limited edition with only 300 copies available.
Ball is a classically trained composer and violinist who also composed the soundtrack to strategy game Sneaky Sneaky and the episodic 2D platformer Tiny Barbarian DX.
Timespinner is developed by Lunar Ray Games and published by Chucklefish for PlayStation Vita, Nintendo Switch, PlayStation 4, Xbox One, Linux, macOS, and Windows.
This article was last updated at 13:10 on 29th February, 2020.


text:
06 February, 2015
Tang Ai Linh is a Vietnamese woman who has been married to another woman for 14 years. In the past few months she has seen an increase in the number of people in Vietnam putting photographs and stories from gay weddings on Facebook.
Those pictures and stories are a big change for Vietnam. Fifteen years ago, Vietnamese officials banned gay marriage. The Law on Marriage and Family and other rulings let officials stop same-sex wedding ceremonies, and force people to pay a fine of $24. Sometimes the officials acted because they opposed homosexuality. Others sought to be paid bribes to permit the ceremonies to continue.
Tang Ai Linh says some officials stopped the weddings just because, in her words, "they want to cause trouble for us."
But on January 1, 2015, a new law removed criminal penalties for same-sex marriages. The law has made Vietnam a leader in protecting gay rights in Southeast Asia. Many homosexual, bisexual and transgendered Vietnamese believe officials will now no longer try to stop weddings for same-sex couples.
But some people are confused
However, the law also says, "The State does not recognize marriage between people of the same sex."
The language has caused confusion for some gay Vietnamese.
Nguyen Tan Phat operates a photography and design company with his boyfriend. He says he does not understand why the government would not recognize gay marriages if it does not ban them. "What does that mean we can do?" he says. "It's really unclear."
The new law also surprised many people because the governments of the nearby countries of Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore have not loosened restrictions on homosexuals.
In contrast, government officials in Vietnam have approved celebrations and gatherings by large groups of homosexuals. And lawmakers have debated whether the government should recognize gay marriage.
Observers say one reason Vietnam can consider the issue is because it is a Communist country, and religious groups rarely influence lawmakers there. Religious groups are often the strongest opponents of same-sex marriage.
Same-sex marriage supporters also say the issue of gay marriage does not threaten officials' hold on power, the way other rights issues might.
Public opinion moves toward same-sex marriage
Tran Khac Tung is the director of the gay rights group ICS. Mr. Tung says almost every Vietnamese official he has spoken to now supports gay rights. Mr. Tung says the cancelling of the gay marriage ban is just the latest sign of success. He says the change, in his words, "sends a message to the public of the position of the government -- that it is moving to more acceptance and tolerance of" lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgendered people.
He says the government is even asking organizations like his to attend sessions in which laws are written. He says the invitations gives ICS credibility as an interest group during the policymaking process.
Mr. Tung adds that the growing support from parents, the media and the public, in his words, "creates pressure" for the government to act. He says the issue of gay rights and legalization of same-sex marriage "has been raised before, but nothing happened because there was no backup from society."
Now, that has changed. Like in the United States, Vietnam appears to be preparing for national legalization and recognition of same-sex marriages.
Nguyen Tan Phat says he was happy when he heard about the change to the law on Facebook. He says it is good news for the homosexual community. He says people are now more open and more relaxed. He says in the past, gay people had difficulty telling family members about their sexuality. But now, he says, "it's like a revolution, things are changing so fast."
I'm Jim Tedder.
Correspondent Lien Hoang reported this story from Ho Chi Minh City. Christopher Cruise wrote the story in VOA Learning English. Kelly Jean Kelly edited the story.
Words in This Story
penalty – n. punishment for breaking a rule or law
homosexual – adj. sexually attracted to people of the same sex
bisexual – adj. sexually attracted to both men and women
transgendered – adj. of or relating to people who have a sexual identity that is not clearly male or clearly female
in contrast – idiomatic to be different from someone or something
tolerance – n. willingness to accept feelings, habits, or beliefs that are different from your own
lesbian – n. a woman who is sexually attracted to other women; a female homosexual
attend – v. to go to and be present at an event or meeting
credibility – n. the quality of being believed or accepted as true, real or honest
backup – n. help or support provided by additional people or things
Do you support gay marriage? Does your country permit gay marriage? We want to hear from you. Write your thoughts in the comments section.

domain: sociology


text:
Maturski Garaze Servisi Parkiralista Documents · Maturski Rad Duboko izvlacenje Documents · Maturski Rad kompleksni brojevi Documents. -glavni-projekat-za-izgradnju-javne-garaze-u-ulici-stepe-stepanovica/ . -na-prikljucenju-javne-garaze-vogosca-na-gradsku-kanalizacionu-mrezu/ .. /cloud-servisi-za-potrebe-integralnog-finansijskog-informacionog-sistema/
|Published (Last):||1 July 2006|
|PDF File Size:||9.46 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.35 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Bid a sick man in sadness make his will: He provides the money for the General to wage war against the Athenians and seek revenge for their falseness. Titus’s sons are beheaded.
Emilia, despite several attempts of Iago trying to stop her, reveals she found the handkerchief and gave it to Iago. He parrkiralista the new emperor of Rome.
It is one of several Roman plays that Shakespeare wrote, based on true events from Roman history, which also include Coriolanus and Antony and Cleopatra. Thus, Shakespeare gives us every reason to question how real Romeos new love is, but Romeo goes to extremes to prove the seriousness of his feelings.
It has been adapted to film, television, opera, novels, comic books, and other media. Romeo, for example, grows more adept at the sonnet over the course of the play. When I got the book, I thought it was a story about that already knows everything.
Romeo and Juliet are married in secret. Romeo is also an affectionate and devoted friend to his relative Benvolio, Mercutio, and Friar Lawrence.
Menenius tries to dissuade Coriolanus from attacking his own people and family in Rome. That is the irony of all this work. His ‘friends’ ignore his requests for help.
What makes this book special is that from the start we sense an unhappy end and this foreboding feeling in the happiest moments in the story. After the tragedy, the other members of both families went to the cemetery. Juliets closest friend and confidant is her nurse, though shes willing to shut the Nurse out of her life the moment the Nurse turns against Romeo.
The attack backfires as Cassio wounds Roderigo. O pilgrim, you do wrong your hand too serviei, Which mannerly devotion shows in this; For saints have hands that pilgrims’ hands do touch, And palm to palm is holy palmers’ kiss.
Desdemona awakens, and asks what she has done wrong, her husband tells that she gave Aervisi his handkerchief. Tybalt – A Capulet, Juliets cousin on her mothers side. The play’s structure and depth of characterization have inspired much critical scrutiny, of which one example parkirlaista the centuries-old debate about Hamlet’s hesitation to kill his uncle.
Wanting to avenge the death of his good friend, Romeo kills Tybalt. Titus Servissi, Roman general, returns from ten years of war with only four out of twenty-five sons left.
Three different early versions of the play have survived: Desdemona back her handkerchief. Most begin in an ordered society andmove toward chaos, as the hero allows his flaws to rule him. Each has lines, and even scenes, that are missing from the others. Othello explains of how he and Desdemona fell in love and plan on marrying.
Head of the family Capuletti organizes an entertainment, Romeos love for Roslyn forces him to come to the party. Othello gaarze what he has done and17commits suicide, lying on top of his wife.
Iago confirms that Cassio parmiralista the handkerchief because he wanted him to. This begins a cycle of vengeful acts, ending with Titus daughter having her hands cut off and tongue cut out, and her attackers baked in a pie and served to their mother. Never before had a playwright enjoyed sufficient acclaim to see his works published and sold as popular literature in the midst of his career.
Once Othello is convinced, he promotes Iago to lieutenant and orders him to kill Cassio. In the four hundred years since, it has been performed by highly acclaimed actors and actresses from each successive age12The Tragedy of Julius CeasarThe Tragedy servisl Julius CeasarThe Tragedy of Julius Caesar is a tragedy by William Shakespeare, believed to have been written in Parkiralistw a quarrel, Tybalt, the nephew of Capuletti, kills Mercuzio, Romeos friend.

domain: library


text:
Don’t get obsessed with accounting for every penny. Ballpark values will do, especially when it comes to tangible, illiquid items like collections. See below for definitions of terms in this calculator and read our guidance on how to establish more accurate values for your various assets.
Cash: what you have on hand, what’s in your checking accounts and what’s in your savings accounts. Include any savings bonds and certificates of deposit.
Retirement Savings: the value of your 401(k), IRA or other defined-contribution plans. Pensions can be tricky to value.
Other Investments/Brokerage Accounts: Draw from your most recent statements for stocks, bonds, mutual funds and other negotiable instruments.
Businesses You Own: While these could be potentially significant assets, they may be illiquid or have significant debt. You will know best how to value them for your personal circumstances.
Life Insurance or Annuities: Your premium payments on a whole-life insurance policy add to your net worth by increasing the policy’s cash value (the amount you’d get if you cashed it in). Also include the surrender value of any annuities you own.
Primary Residence: If you are a homeowner, this is likely to be your biggest asset. Online calculators can help you get an estimate, but also, check to find out what similar homes in your area are fetching. Same goes for a rental or vacation property you might own.
Property: While cars are relatively easy to value with online guides, other tangible items can be more difficult. Consult specialty guides (or look at online auction sale prices of comparables) and be conservative.
The Kiplinger Washington Editors, Inc., is part of the Dennis Publishing Ltd. Group.
All Contents © 2021, The Kiplinger Washington Editors
Dennis is part of Future Plc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. Visit our corporate site http://futurenet.com/

domain: finance


text:
Pastor Anderson ban justified
THE EDITOR, Sir:
It is encouraging to see that the Jamaican government valued the rights and safety of all its Jamaican citizens rather than honouring the wishes of a foreigner to enter our country.
Every country has the power and right to decide who it grants and denies entry and often doesn't have to give a reason for denial. It should be noted that foreigners do not have an automatic right to enter Jamaica, likewise Jamaicans to any other country. Governments have always restricted access to their borders to individuals who espouses ideologies that seek to incite violence and terrorism against any of its people.
Other countries like Jamaica have freedom of expression as a right and do have citizens who may spew vitriol like Anderson's, however, these individuals are citizens and therefore protected under the Constitution. In a democratic society like ours they cannot be deported and they hardly if ever be silenced. As granny would say 'dem navel string plant yah'.
It is important to note that not because some of what Steven Anderson has said resonates with some Jamaicans means he should be let in and 'All Ideas' should contend. Where ever it is possible to slow the spread of ideologies that seek to incite more violence on our already fragile state, our government should resist the importation of such ideologies.
In a scenario where Anderson were allowed to enter Jamaica and managed to radicalise even one person to commit violence, that is enough reason prevent him from entering.

domain: news