text:
Transcript for Senate Holds Hearing on Potential Strike on Syrian Targets
This is a special room. Report from ABC news. Look when I'm downtown for a New York with a CBC news digital special room. -- for the first time since President Obama publicly ask congress to authorize strikes in Syria. High ranking senators will question in public State Department and military leaders. Secretary of defense Chuck Hagel and -- you see -- secretary of state John Kerry making their way in along with Martin Dempsey the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. All of in this room this afternoon pushing. For military intervention and this was the scene just a short time ago. Some protesters being taken out before that hearing to get under way. And before that hearing that's -- wanna go now from the senate ABC news senior Washington correspondent Jeff sunny joining me now Jeff. Good afternoon to you senator's gonna room today who are either opposing action or who possibly may be on the fence. What is their main concern about the president's for. Mosul. -- -- -- their main concern is that they feel the White House and the president have not. Yet fully articulated why a military strike would be necessary. And we're talking from Democrats and Republicans here as well so what this hearing is today is really the first in a series of hearings we'll hear all week -- senators will have the opportunity. To ask questions of secretary of state John Kerry Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and they would probably will not focus on. Specifically -- chemical weapons used in Syria but. Instead of what type of and strike what type how limited will it be of a strike against a -- but there's been many developments on this. A story today house speaker John Boehner came out this morning in support of this so -- Republicans on the house that are -- but the senate here this afternoon some key questions that need to be answered. And certainly they will be it is of those answers and we're listening to senator Bob Menendez from New Jersey who make it's and the opening statements -- and you can see occasion. The secretary of -- secretary of defense and the chairman of charges of -- all the floor in the presiding committee sent there. Let's listen in -- they would that's good you have a couple of things went to talk to about the just as sure a couple of moments are gonna play out in this hearing. Violation of the committee rules. Let me welcome secretary Kerry. Back to the committee that he chaired secretary cable and a committee that he served on. And the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff general Dempsey to the committee. We convene this hearing as we have convened and many before. To make one of the most difficult decisions we're -- and -- to make. The authorization of the use of American military power. This time in Syria to respond to the horrific chemical attack of August 21. That took the lives of 1429. Syrians. Including. At least 426. Children. The images of that day for sickening. And in my view the -- could not ignore the inhumanity. And Behar of this act. I do not take our responsibility to authorize military force lightly. Or make such decisions easily. I voted against the war in Iraq. And strongly have supported a withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan. But today I support the president's decision to use military force in the face of this horrific crime against humanity. Yes there are risks to action. But the consequences of inaction. Are greater and graver still. Further humanitarian disaster in Syria. Regional instability. The loss of American credibility. And around -- senator Menendez has begun hearing we of course and we'll listen in and did back in relation to some of the dialogue as those questions. Against the starts on the first here in black jets on a want to bring you back into this. Obviously getting congressional support is of utmost importance of the president but publicly though. What are polls showing how about the -- -- America's response to possible involvement in Syria. All day and -- right -- polls are showing. Priests wide and deep skepticism including -- -- latest ABC news Washington Post poll just out this hour. Is showing that nearly six in ten Americans oppose intervention in Syria. That six in ten perhaps not surprisingly but that is a significant number only thirty. Only 36%. Support for this action now that changes a little bit if there's more allied support -- the United States has support from other allies. But the opposition. Falls down just about 51%. About half so -- take away here is that the American public is uncomfortable with going at this alone. And I think that is first exactly the strain of questions -- hear from the a foreign relations committee hearing. We just heard a few moments ago the chairman -- Menendez saying he opposed the Iraq War but he is supportive of these so serious strikes so. We'll hear a lot about this harassment that is where this opposition comes from our poll shows there is still this war wariness. In the country and the White House needs to make its case for why this is different and Jeff just before we started -- takes. Her Menendez is opening comments you had mentioned the fact that. House's house leader John Boehner had come out in support. Making a very strong. -- show of confidence in the president's proposal today after the president met with congressional leaders. And you remarked earlier that yes in fact it was an interest -- show of bipartisanship but not necessarily surprised that he would be supporting the president. Not necessarily mean like in most cases of war. It is typical for congressional leaders to support the president support the commander in chief but interestingly about speaker Boehner. He after he made those remarks outside the White House. His. Spokesman sent out a follow up by. A press release to reporters as saying -- to look he's speaking only for himself. The house Republican leader -- speaker Boehner is not urging other Republicans in the house to do this this is what they call. A vote of conscience that members are able to make their own decisions here that's why we're seeing a lot of unusual alliances some support from some. Moderate -- -- for Republicans if you will. And strong opposition from a libertarian strain as well as many Liberal Democrats -- And I want to now go from the house to obviously with the -- gonna have to say in. So the answers that we might find out from today's hearing. Who will we be hearing from today either questions and obviously responding. We'll be the secretary of defense secretary of state and the -- of the Joint Chiefs of Staff but. But when someone in particular that I know a lot of folks -- going to be paid attention to would be senator Marco Rubio it 3016 likely presidential candidate. He has and he is a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee and so he. Whatever questions -- alas we'll certainly be a noted -- since he is a freshman senator when we of course -- -- hear a lot about him. Because of his prominence he's a rising Republican figure but. Because his seniority status -- ask his question. Almost last today so most things probably will be asked by the time he gets to -- he is. What he decides on this his vote -- next week when the senate -- votes. Will likely stick with -- this is a vote. A deep consequence here but and you really get the sense right now certainly in the last 24 of 48 hours that. The movement on Capitol Hill the sentiment on Capitol Hill. -- is shifting a little bit more in the direction of supporting the white house on -- serious strikes there was some more skepticism over the weekend when these first briefing started. But day by day as these briefings go on more. Senators and members are saying this support this -- this is still going to be a very. Tough. Challenge for the White House we've not yet heard from Rand Paul. He is not a member of the committee he will likely not be seen this afternoon BC has some tough questions of course Republican of Kentucky. Leading libertarian he is deeply opposed to this and is leading the opposition. And I do want to make a correction and that we saw some video at the very top as this hearing was about to get under way. Some members of code pink peace activist group there. -- Had been making some statements and a senator Menendez did not have them removed from rather -- that they respectfully remain quiet throughout the proceedings so. I just -- to correct that from what we did see from the very top of the video that was plain out. That Jeff I want to ask you we've heard senator Bob Corker from Tennessee to communities in the committee's ranking member. He expressed his support for intervention in Syria earlier today and I want to listen to what he said because there was a bit of a caveat that he yet. Based on the conversation just ahead in the -- -- that I think that we are in agreement as to. The office space it needs to address. And again I think these hearings today while I know that. Senator in the -- sectarian hate. Certainly addressed the the fact that we have regarding use of chemical. I think it's very important for them -- also address the other aspects. -- what are those other aspects that the senator is talking about. Well some of those other aspirants charges specifically what a military strike would look like you -- you see some opposing. Suggestions -- Senator John McCain and senator Lindsey Graham you know two of the most prominent hawks if you will on the Republican side in the senate. Visited the White House on Monday and they are looking for a broader military strike. So many other senators are looking for -- more limited strikes so. It's not necessarily. The the biggest unanswered questions are not necessarily what happened in Syria. Him over the past two weeks with a chemical weapons attack but what the US would do about it and what type of strike. Would be for which is why a lot of these. Things -- hearing in classified briefings we're hearing reports. We probably of course will not hear the exact military prescription for this in this public setting because this is a military operation but. Members are very concerned about the scope of this war resolution. Who's there is a concern among several on both sides of the of the -- about having too broad -- -- war resolution here so. With the White House administration the Defense Department still needs to clarify exactly what type of strikes they're talking about. I wanna talk just for a minute and as we are watching here at this proceeding to get under way I want to talk about the international community and the support and really -- a larger scale the United Nations. As the evidence -- arrived in The Hague today that was gathered over the past couple of days by those UN weapons inspectors. In Syria. Ban Ki Moon the UN chief said today that the -- Syria needed to stop on the chemical weapons was unacceptable but in fact that. He opposed any kind of military intervention and it begs the question what is the role of the UN plane now at this point. Three and certainly does and that actually hits it. Exactly what it it it echoes much of the opposition. Here on Capitol Hill they're saying look if the UN. Time is saying that you know yes this was a chemical weapons attack but you know are opposing a strike then why should the United States become involved we see this same -- -- -- -- opposition. In these public opinion polls and why should the US be going at this alone but. -- secretary Kerry has made this fairly clear he's saying that is the moral obligation moral responsibility. Of the United States two. Go in and -- react to this and we're also hearing. Of all the different strains of -- support. An opposition here one significant a string of support for strikes comes from the pro Israel the community. And they are very concerned about Iran here so that is a lots of what we're going to be hearing. I'm here at the hearing today the consequences of this in the UN not much attention is being paid to what the UN is doing no one really expected the UN. Two I recommend action on this with the Russia. Opposed to this in the -- essentially non starter so that's why these debates are happening in Washington. Yet the relationship between Israel Turkey Jordan a lot of other countries in the Middle East has certainly been brought up over the past several days as the potential of a military strike has been discussed. And the various military options that that in fact could be employed it can if congress does -- that kind of approval. But is far as the divide. On the debate it is not necessarily just along party lines this is not a Democrat Republican issue. It's not at all and this is often -- The case of a military action -- war action but even more importantly this is a very different congress were talking about here than the last time that there is a significant -- war debate but you're right it's not divided along. Republican and democratic -- we are seeing these unusual alliances that often happen during these. Matters of national security and on the opposition side which is largely being led by Rand Paul or at least he's the -- forefront of this. You know a libertarian. Strain and with the liberal side of the Democratic Party have strong opposition camp. A more hawks and more moderate Democrats. Are more likely to support this so the question is if this is very close how many arms can be twisted. How much capital does the president have on the matter like this. I actually asked a member of the Congressional Black Caucus on Sunday -- represented Bennie Thompson for Mississippi. And I -- isn't the president's. And prestige and stature on the line here. And he said that is not as important as what's right we night in another military action so interestingly a lot of members of the Congressional Black Caucus. Liberal Democrats are opposed to this action. Since since -- just grades based on -- on the idea of it. All right -- as they -- this I wanna go now ranking member senator Bob Corker speaking on the floor. One of the issues that many members -- -- have is. The fact is that should we support an authorization for the use of military force and I think that. Everyone here knows that I am very -- inclined to do so and am working closely with senator Menendez for something that will be a starting point for this committee's discussions and I know each member. We'll have a ten foot and -- -- and France on what it is that we end up deciding to vote upon. The one of the problems that members have and I think this hearing and Mars hearing is important to answer. Is while we make policy. You ample man. And the implementation of this is very very important. And I think -- -- mixed signals about what that implementation. Actually is going to Maine and the effect it's gonna have on the country. That were involved in. I wanna say that I was just in the region as I know many people have men and I am still. Totally. Dismayed. At that lack of support. We are given and given to them that and moderate. Opposition. We publicly stated what that support is going to be even though it's being carried out and -- -- way. But it is to some degree humiliating. To me in a refugee camp. When our policy has banned that we are going to. Trying. We're going to aquae. We're going to get humanitarian aid to them that an opposition. And yet when you sit down with the people or coalescing around like general -- and others -- level of that has occur. -- today's focus is going to -- largely. On the issue of chemical warfare just. And I know that the case has to be made and I know -- each of us have had the opportunity to hear that case to say intelligence. To understand on what basis. These claims have been made in my guess is that most everyone here fully. Believes that chemical weapons have been used on civilians. So large -- very. Son -- -- -- made to the American people today as you're making -- But it's my whole. That a big part of what you're gonna do here today -- -- we talked about this earlier this morning at the White House. But -- to make a case. As -- watts area. Is important to our national interest. Watts area matters to the region. Why it's important for us to carry out this stated strategy. And Howard game continued -- to carry out that stated strategy. One of the things that I do not want to say in a solvers -- nation. He is after if it's authorized and forced takes place. -- -- as to how wanna see as continued to carry out the strategy that has been stayed in man is building. The capacity. Of the that'd moderate opposition -- I'd like to have you address that. I'm like to have you today also addressed. How this years of military force supports that strategy. How it's going to affect the region in the aftermath. So I thank you for being here today I know a big part. Of what we're discerning today in what we're making decisions upon is the credibility of the United States of America. I know that people in the region are watching. I know that we -- has an -- to move along with many of the activities that we've stated we're going to be can hang out so today I hope they need to be. We'll bring clarity to -- I know we're gonna talk about chemical warfare but I hope -- -- give us even more clarity about our opposition. Strengthening. About how this is gonna affect us overall and I -- all leave here today with a clear understanding. How this strategy is going to be carried out that thank you -- -- -- your testimony. Secretary -- -- -- members of the committee. Ranking member corker thank you very very much for. Having us here today we look forward to this opportunity to be able to share we do. -- Obama's vision with the respect too not just this action. But as senator corker is inquired appropriately. About Syria itself. And the course of action in the Middle East. Mr. chairman. Thank you for welcoming Torres of this deserve first public event since early -- so. We're all. Happy -- here. As we convene. For this debate. It's not an exaggeration to say to you all of -- my former colleagues. That the world is watching not just to see what we decide. But -- watching to see how we make this decision. Whether in a dangerous world. We can still make our government speak with one voice. They want to know -- American will rise to this moment and make a difference. And the question of whether to authorize our nation to take military action is as you have said mister chairman and you've echoed. -- ranking member. This is obviously. One of the most important decisions one of the most respect of -- responsibilities of this committee. -- of any senator in the course of -- career. The president and the administration of -- Appreciate. That you have returned quickly to the nation's capital to address it -- that you are appropriately beginning a process. The focusing was great care and great precision. Which is the only way to approach the potential use of military power. Ranking member -- I know that you want to discusses his said why Syria matters to our national security and our strategic interest. Beyond the compelling humanitarian reasons. And I look forward with -- secretary -- and general Dempsey. To laying that out here this afternoon. But first. It is important. To explain to the American people why we're here. It's important for people who may not have caught every component of the news over the course of the Labor Day weekend. To join us all of us and focusing in on what is at stake here. That's why the president the United States made the decision as he did contrary to what many people thought he would do. Of asking the congress to join in this decision we are stronger. As a nation. When we do that. So we're here. Because against -- global warnings from the president of the United States. From the congress. From our friends and allies around the world. And even from Russia and Iran. The Assad regime and only undeniable lead the Assad regime -- Unleashed an outrageous chemical attack. Against its own citizens. We're here because a dictator. And his family's personal enterprise. In their lust to hold on to power. We're willing to infect the year Damascus with a poison that killed innocent mothers and fathers. And hundreds of their children their lives all snuffed out by gas. In the early morning of August when he first. Now some people here in there are amazingly. Have questioned the evidence of this assault on conscience. I repeat here again today that only the most willful desire. To avoid reality. Can assert that this did not occur as described. For that the regime did not do it. It did happen. And the Assad regime did it. I remember Iraq. Secretary hagel remembers Iraq. General Dempsey especially remembers Iraq the secretary -- alumni and many of you sitting on the -- us remember Iraq. In a special way because we were here for that vote. We voted. And so we are especially sensitive. -- denied to never again. Asking any member of congress to take a vote. On faulty intelligence. And that is why our intelligence community has scrubbed and -- scrubbed the evidence. We have declassified. Unprecedented. Amounts of information. And we ask the American people in the rest of the world to judge that information. We can tell you beyond any reasonable doubt. That are evidence proves the Assad regime prepared for this attack. Issued instructions to prepare for this attack. Warned its own forces to use gas masks. -- we have physical evidence. Of where the rockets came from and win. Not one of rocket landed in regime controlled territory not one. All of them landed in opposition controlled. Or contested territory. We have a map. Physical evidence. Showing every geographical point of impact. And that is concrete. Within minutes of the attack. Ninety I think to be precise maybe -- slightly shorter. The social media exploded with horrific images. Of the damage that had been cause men and women the elderly and children sprawled on -- hospital floor. Would no wounds no blood. But all dead. Those scenes of human chaos and desperation were not contrived. They were real -- no one could contrive such -- scene. We have certain that none of the opposition has the weapons or capacity to -- to strike of this scale. Particularly. From the heart -- regime territory. Just think about it in logical terms common sense. With high confidence our intelligence community tells us that after the strike the regime issued orders to stop. And then fretted openly we know. About the possibility of UN inspectors discovering evidence. So then they began to systematically tried to destroy it. Contrary to my discussion with their foreign minister. Who said we have nothing to hide I said if you have nothing to hide then let the inspectors in today and let it -- on restrictive. It was and they didn't. It took four days of shelling. For that he finally allowed the -- under constrained. Prearranged structure. And we now have learned that the hair and blood samples. From first responders in east Damascus. Has tested positive for signatures of Sarin. So my colleagues we know what happened. For all the lawyers. For all the former prosecutors for all those who have sat on a jury. I can tell you. That we know these things beyond the reasonable doubt that is the standard by which we send people to jail for the rest of their lives. So we're here because what happened two weeks ago. But we're also here. Because of what happened nearly a century ago. In the darkest moments of World War I. And after the horror of gas warfare when the vast majority of the world came together to declare. In no uncertain terms that chemical weapons crossed the line of conscience. And they must be banned from use forever. Over the years that followed. Over a 180. Countries. Including Iran. Iraq. And Russia. Agreed and they joined the chemical weapons convention. Even countries with whom we agree on little. Agreed. On that conviction. There are some -- tried to suggest that the debate we're having today. Is about president Obama's. Red line. I could not more forcefully state that. Is just plain and simply wrong. This debate is about the world's red line. It's about humanity's red line and it's a red line that anyone with a conscience ought to draw. This today it is also about Congress's own red line. You the United States congress agreed to the chemical weapons convention. You the United States congress passed the Syria accountability act which says. Syria's chemical weapons are quote. Threaten the security of the Middle East and the national security interest of the United States. -- the congress have spoken out about grave consequences. If -- in particular used chemical weapons. So I say to senator corker that is one of the reasons. Why Syria is important. And as we debated in the world watches as you decide and the world wonders. Not whether Assad's regime executed the worst chemical weapons attack of the 21 century. That fact I think is now beyond question. The world wonders. Whether the United States of America will consent. Through silence. To standing aside while this kind of brutality is allowed to happen without consequence. In the nearly 100 years since the first global commitment against chemical weapons. Only to tyrants. Dared to cross the world's brightest -- line. Now Bashar Al -- -- has become the third. And I think all of you know that history holds nothing but infamy for those criminals. And history reserves also. Very little sympathy for their enablers. So the reality. Is the gravity of this moment. That is the importance of the decision that this congress faces -- that the world is waiting to learn about in these next days. Now ranking member corker asked. A central question. Why should Americans care beyond what I've just said which ought to be enough. In the judgment of the president and this administration. Well. It is clear that. In addition to what I've just mentioned about the Syria accountability act and the threat to the Middle East. We cannot overlook the impact of chemical weapons. And the danger that they -- to a particularly volatile. Area of the world. In which we've been deeply invested three years. Because we have great friends there we have allies there we have deep interest there. Since president Obama's policy is that Assad must go. It is not insignificant. That to deprive. -- of the capacity to use chemical weapons. Or to degrade the capacity to use those chemical weapons. Actually deprives him of a lethal weapon in this ongoing civil war and that has an impact. That can help to stabilize the region ultimately. In addition we have other important strategic national security interest not just in the prevention of the proliferation of chemical weapons. But to avoid the creation of -- safe haven in Syria. -- a base of operations for extremists. To use these weapons against our friends all of us know. That the extremes of both sides. Are there waiting in the wings working and pushing and fighting. They be desperate to get their hands on these materials. And the fact is that if nothing happens. To begin to change the equation -- the current calculation. That area can become even more so. An area of -- governed space where those extremists threaten even the United States and more immediately. If they get their hands on those weapons. Allies and friends of ours like Jordan or Israel or Lebanon or others. Forcing -- -- to change his calculation about his ability to act with impunity. Can contribute to his realization. That he cannot gas or shoot his way out of his predicament. Then as I think you know it has been the president's primary goal. To achieve a negotiated resolution. But you gotta have parties prepared to negotiate to achieve that. Syria is also important because quite simply I I can't put this to you more. More plainly. And it just ask each of -- to ask yourselves. If you're -- -- -- -- named one of the other dust that's in that region. And the United States steps back from this moment together with our other allies and friends. What is the message. The message is that he has been granted impunity. The freedom to choose to use the weapons again. Or force us to go through this cycle again with -- who knows what outcome after once refusing it. We would have granted him the capacity to use these weapons against more people. With greater levels of damage because we would have stood and stepped away. As confidently as we know what happened in Damascus from our friends on August 21. We know that I side would read are stepping away -- are silence. As an invitation to use those weapons -- impunity. -- creating impunity we will be creating opportunity. The opportunity for other dictators and or terrorist to pursue their own weapons of mass destruction. Including. Nuclear weapons. I will tell you there are some people hoping that the United States congress doesn't vote. For this very limited request the president has put before you. Around -- hoping you look the other way. Our inaction would surely give them a permission slip. For them to at least misinterpret our intention. If not to put it to the test. Hezbollah -- is hoping that isolationism will prevail. North Korea is hoping that ambivalence carries today. There are all. Listening for our silence. And if we don't answer Assad today we will -- a standard that has existed. For those hundred years. In fact we will -- the standard that has protected our own troops in war. And we will invite even more dangerous tests down the road. Our allies and our partners. Are also counting on us in this situation. The people of Israel of Jordan. Of Turkey. Each looked next door and they see that there one stiff breeze away from the potential. Of being hurt there civilians. Being killed as a consequence of choices Assad might take in the absence of action. They anxiously await our assurance. That our word. Mean something. They await the assurance that if the children lined up in -- bloodied burial shrouds were their own children. That we would keep the world's promise that's what they're hoping. So the authorization the President Obama seeks. Is definitively. In our national security interest. We need to send to Syria -- to the world to dictators and to terrorist allies and two civilians alike the unmistakable. Message. That -- in the United States of America and the world say never again we don't mean sometimes we don't mean somewhere. Never means never. So this is a vote for accountability. Norms and laws that keep the civilized world civil mean nothing if they're not enforced. As justice Jackson said in his opening argument at the Nuremberg trials. The ultimate step in avoiding periodic wars. Which are inevitable in a system of international lawlessness. Is to make statesman. Responsible. To the law. If the world's worst desperate see that they can -- -- with impunity prohibitions against the world's worst weapons. Then those prohibitions. Are just pieces of paper. That is what we mean by accountability and that is what we mean by we cannot be silent. So let me be clear. President Obama is not asking America to go to war. And I say that sitting next to two men secretary Agilent chairman Dempsey who know what war is. Senator McCain knows what war is. They know the difference between going to war. -- what President Obama is requesting now. We all agree there will be no American boots on the ground. The president has made crystal clear we have no intention of assuming responsibility. For serious civil war. He is asking only for the power to make clear. To make certain. That the United States means what we say that the world when we joined together in a multi lateral statement mean what we say. He's asking for authorization. To degrade and deter by -- -- -- capacity. To use chemical weapons. Now some will undoubtedly ask and I think appropriately. What about the unintended consequences of action. Some fear -- retaliation that leads to a larger conflict. -- let me put it bluntly. If -- is arrogant enough and I would say foolish enough. To retaliate to the consequences of his own criminal activity. The United States and our allies have ample ways to make him regret that decision without going to war. Even Assad supporters. Russia and Iran. Say publicly that the use of chemical weapons is unacceptable. Now some will also question the extent of our responsibility. To them I say. When someone kills hundreds of children with a weapon in the world has banned. We are all responsible. That is true because of treaties like the Geneva convention and the chemical weapons convention. And for us to Syria accountability act. But it's also true. Because we share a common humanity. And a common decency. This is not the time for armchair isolationism. This is not the time to be spectators to slaughter. Neither our country nor our conscience can afford the cost of silence. We have spoken up against unspeakable are many times in the past. Now we must stand up and act. And we must protect our security. Protect our values. And lead the world with conviction. That is clear about our responsibility. Thank you. When he was secretary of committee will be in order. Do you -- in order. The line. Police whose daughter. Secretary. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- I have feelings very similar to. That protestor. And I would just say that is exactly why it is so important that we are all here having this debate. Talking about these things before the country. And and that the congress itself -- -- Represented the American people and I think we all can respect those of revenue from point of view and we do. Secretary and mr. chairman thank you. -- Mendez and -- -- member corker members of the committee. As we all know in the coming days congress will debate. How to respond. To the most recent chemical weapons attack and Syria. Large scale. Serin gas assault. Perpetrated by the Syrian government. Against its own people. As a former senator and member of this committee and I welcome this debate. And I strongly support president Obama's decision to seek congressional authorization for the use of force Syria. As each of us knows. Committing the country don't using military force. Is the most difficult decision America's leaders can make. As ranking member of corker noted. All of those who are privileged to serve our nation. Have a responsibility to ask tough questions. Before that commitment is made. The American people must be assured that their leaders are acting according to US national interest. With well defined military objectives. -- understanding of the risks. And the consequences and -- The president. Along with his entire national security team ask those tough questions before we concluded. That United States should take military action. Against Syria because. Of what the aside regime has done. Want to address how we reach this decision. By clarifying the US interest at stake our military objectives. And the risk of not acting. At this critical juncture. As President Obama said the use of chemical weapons in Syria is not only an assault on humanity. It is a serious threat to America's national security interest and those of our closest allies. The Syrian regime's use of chemical weapons. Poses -- grave risk to our friends and partners along Syria's borders. Including Israel Jordan Turkey Lebanon and Iraq. If -- side is prepared to use chemical weapons against his own people. We have to be concerned that terrorist groups like Hezbollah which -- forces in serious supporting this -- regime. Would -- And would use them. That risk of chemical weapons proliferation poses a direct threat to our friends our partners in the US personnel in the region. We cannot afford for Hezbollah -- any terrorist group determined to strike the United States. There have incentives to acquire or use chemical weapons. The Syrian regime's actions risk eroding the nearly century old international norm against the use of chemical weapons which secretary Kerry. As noted. And norm that is help. Protect. Help protect the United States homeland. And American forces operating across the globe from those terrible weapons. Weakening this norm. Could embolden other regimes to acquire or use chemical weapons for example. North Korea maintains a massive stockpile of chemical weapons that threatens our treaty ally the Republic of Korea. And the 28000 US troops stationed there. I've just returned from Asia. We're at a very serious and long conversation with South Korea's defense minister. About the threat the real threat. That North -- stockpile of chemical weapons presents to them. Our allies throughout the world must be assured that the United States will fulfill its security commitments. Given these threats to our national security. The United States must demonstrate through our actions that the use of chemical weapons. Is unacceptable. The president has made clear. That Arab military objectives in Syria. Would be to hold the Asad regime accountable. Degrade its ability to carry out these kinds of attacks. And deter the regime from further use of chemical weapons. The Department of Defense has developed military options to achieve these objectives. And we are positioned to US assets throughout the region to successfully -- execute this mission. We believe we can achieve them with a military action that would be limited in duration and scope. General Dempsey and I have assured the president that US forces will be ready to act whenever the president gives the order. We are also working with our allies and our partners in this effort. -- parks including France Turkey. Saudi Arabia United Arab Emirates and friends in the region of assured us there strong support. Of US action. In defining our military objectives. We've made clear. There we are not seeking to resolve the underlying conflict in Syria through direct military force. Instead. We are contemplating actions that are tailored to respond to the use of chemical weapons. A political solution created by the Syrian people is the only way to ultimately end the violence. In Syria. And secretary care. Is leading international efforts to help the parties in Syria move. Toward a negotiated transition. The transition that means a free. And inclusive Syria. We're also committed to doing more to assist to Syrian opposition. But -- must be held accountable for using these weapons in defiance of the international community. Having define America's interest in our military objectives. We also must examine the risks. And the consequences of action. As well as the consequences. Of inaction. There are always risks in taking action. The aside regime under increasing pressure by the Syrian opposition. Could feel empowered to carry out even more devastating chemical weapons attacks without a response. Chemical weapons make no distinction. Between combatants. And innocents civilians. And inflict the worst kind of indiscriminate suffering. As we have recently seen. A refusal to act would undermine the credibility. Of America's other security commitments including the president's commitment to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon. The word of the United States must mean something. It is vital currency and foreign relations. And international. And allied commitments. Every witness here today. Secretary Kerry general Dempsey myself. As served in uniform fought in war. And seen its ugly realities of close as has. Already been noted Senator McCain. We understand that a country faces few decisions. As grave as using military force. We are not unaware of the cost and ravages of war. But we also understand that America must protect its people and its national interest that is our highest responsibility. All of us who have the privilege a responsibility of serving this great nation owe the American people. And especially those wearing the uniform of our country. A vigorous debate on how America should respond to this horrific chemical weapons attack in -- I know everyone on this committee agrees. And takes their responsibility of office. Just as seriously as the president and everyone sitting at this table. Thank you -- -- Thank you secretary hazel and I know the general -- is available to answer questions. On the members of the committee. And in that regard let me is -- off by. Urging members tomorrow there will be. A intelligence briefing for the committee both the issues at hand as well as. Potential military action so in this adding we obviously somewhat constrained about. What we might discuss. -- who with greater specificity tomorrow. This -- secretary. -- -- Make and have made a compelling case. And I think it's important. I appreciate you reiterating the high degree of confidence. That exist in our intelligence assessments I think those are the conditions precedent to be able to move forward. This weekend I was at a soccer tournament. And I had a group of moms come up to -- and -- Senator we. We saw those pictures of their horrific. -- can't imagine. The devastation. Those parents must feel about their children. Why us. -- Hands so I ask you would you tell them that we would be more secure or less secure. By the actions that are being considered -- which is the president's ask for the authorization of the use of force. Senator I would say unequivocally be unequivocally. That the president's actions will make us more secure. Less likely that side can use as weapons or chooses to use as weapons. And the absence of taking the action the president has asked for will in fact be far more threatening. And dangerous. And potentially ultimately cost lives. And do you consider the consequences. Of inaction are greater than the consequences of action I do. General Dempsey U what do we envision in broad terms. This potential military campaign. To be in terms of its effect what do we expect. At the end of any authorize. Action. Sissy. With the results. -- look like what what is our expectation. Yes thank you chairman the task I've been given -- to develop military options to -- terror that is to say change the -- calculus about the use of chemical weapons and degrade his ability to do so. That is -- -- vote activities directly related to chemical weapons themselves but also potentially. The means of employing them. And anything further than that I would. Prefer to speak about in class -- and I understand it at let me ask you this in the process of achieving those two goals that you just outline. Would -- not -- -- collateral. Consequences of the regime. Further degrading his overall capabilities. The -- Mr. secretary. We received. From. The administration they propose. Resolution -- of the authorization of force. And of course that is a negotiation between. The congress and the administration. This would you tell us what the -- believes that. A prohibition four. Having American boots on the ground is that something that the administration would accept. As part of a resolution. Mr. chairman it would be proper. -- not to not because. There's any intention rate plan -- any desire whatsoever to have boots on the ground. And I think the president will give -- every assurance in the world as MIA. As as the secretary of defense and determined. But in the event Syria. Imploded for instance or in the event. There was a threat of a chemical weapons cache. Falling into the hands. -- -- someone else. That it was clearly in the interest of our allies. And all of us the British the French and others. To prevent those weapons of mass destruction falling into the hands of the worst elements. I don't want to take off the table an option that might or might not be available -- -- the United States to secure country. So I was the only kind of example it's the only thing I can think of that would. Immediately leap to mind to say. You know. Well if we if we said that there'd be. No troops on the ground for combat purposes that clearly. Who assuming that in the going to protect those weapons whether or not they. Have to you know. Cancer shot in order to be secure. I -- -- that at the bottom line is this where we're gonna and I -- to the bottom line afterward I'm absolutely confident. Mr. chairman. That it is. Easy not that complicated to work out language that -- satisfy the congress and the American people that there is no. Door open here. Through it -- -- -- akin march in ways that the congress doesn't want to do while still protecting the national security interest of the country. Confident that can be worked out line bottom line is the president has no intention and will not and we do not want to. Put American troops on the ground to fight this or be involved in the fighting of the civil war. A period I appreciate and I appreciate. Response about chemical weapons and -- possibility. Of securing this in our national security interest as well as our allies but. I do they were gonna have to work on language that makes it clear that this is an overriding issue. That I think that members as well as the American people want to know let me let me ask you what. You mentioned did it in your remarks. What do you think is the calculus. Iran. North Korea. If we fail to act and what is the capital -- of our allies. If we fail to act. What if we fail -- -- we're gonna fewer allies. I mean we're gonna have fewer people who count on a certainly in the region we have. We we have huge doubts right now I hear them and have the privilege of talking -- many of the leaders of -- countries with respect to what they may or may not be inclined to do. I've heard their warnings the very clearly. About what is at -- it's not just for them but for us in the region. And I think that it's fair to say that. Our interest would be seriously set back in many respects. If we are viewed as not capable or willing most important. To follow through on the things that we say matter to us. As I said earlier in my testimony. This really is not. President Obama's red line. The president drew a line that -- One should draw. With respect to this convention that we have signed up -- and which has been in place and stars of World War I. And the truth is that through all of World War II. Through Vietnam through Korea. Through both gulf wars through Afghanistan through Iraq. The combatants. In in in in in those efforts to have never resorted. To this -- So. I think that it's clear where those two prior usage is that I referred to. That. We would be opening pandora's box with respect to a whole -- Of dangerous consequences as a result the United States not keeping its word. And it would make our life very very difficult with respect to North Korea and Iran there's no question in my mind. That those. Countries are watching the mullahs -- and and many others are watching what we are doing now with great interest. And that's why even the -- It's easy listening this -- is days earlier hearing that secretary of state John Kerry. Present before ranking members -- your senate formulations committee talking about possible military action. In Syria. And I want to bring in -- -- who isn't DC's been watching these hearings go on and -- I want to ask you because one of those points. That's old and that the senators have been talking about right now -- secretary has been addressing the specific language. If in fact there were to be military action by the US Hollywood -- not -- the general public but also the international community. That this would not be an open ended commitment that anybody. Right they are talking about that specifically and essentially secretary of state John -- if -- -- down his. Opening statement in his argument here it's trust us. I oppose the Iraq war in fact that his first he he made. This particular note of the fact. His first time sitting before the Senate Foreign Relations -- came at age 27 is a protest for the Vietnam War himself -- saying trust us. Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel bill. A critic of the Iraq War -- saying trust us as well so they are saying it's a very limited operation. Excuse me. And now -- though that's very good please brownies and as these as this hearing -- continuing on of course annually over the next couple of days. When it won't reduce the Senate Foreign Relations Committee but it will also be larger congress as well. On an Asian currency as the secretaries are presenting themselves. -- soon Jeff let me ask you this -- as the president is headed overseas of the G-20 summit. Are those three gentlemen that we are seeing today are than those the president's strongest allies to make their case to congress. I mean they certainly are the ones that have the most information -- Vice President Biden also canceled a trip to Florida he was supposed to be in Florida tomorrow. He is staying behind in Washington so you -- seeing a full court press. From the White House but John Kerry or Chuck Hagel to -- veterans themselves to critics in the Iraq War very important. Are really the front -- here this operation she's all right now absolutely. -- of course very continue to follow this hearing as it takes place going to be live stream and I abcnews.com. And a complete report Jeff sunny thank you so much for your time and your insight on this course as more information is coming out. About a potential strike in Syria as the president is making this case. Now into the American public but also to congress as well. Years from now I'm Dan tougher New York with this ABC news digital special report to be -- This has been a special report from me.
This transcript has been automatically generated and may not be 100% accurate.


text:
Join us here all game long for updates for the San Jose Sharks home opener at the Shark Tank against the Phoenix Coyotes at 7:30pm. The Phoenix Coyotes got their first win of the season against the Columbus Blue Jackets last night, and the Sharks are coming off a 2-game road trip in which they beat both the Flames and Oilers. Check out the full game preview here!
More to come at the puck drop. Go Sharks!

domain: news


text:
Coronavirus: Redbridge Council with £45m “black hole”
- Credit: Archant
The leader of Redbridge Council has said a £45m “black hole” the government has failed to pay back for responding to the coronavirus pandemic will put vital services at risk.
Cllr Jas Athwal hit out at MPs for failing to keep their promise to compensate councils after only paying back £15.7 of the £60m that was spent to keep residents safe during the pandemic.
Without the payment, services like parks, waste collections and even street lighting are at risk in the next financial year.
Cllr Athwal said the government promised full compensation before the lockdown but has accused them of pulling a “U-turn” by leaving it with a £45m financial black hole.
He is calling on residents and businesses to sign a petition lobbying the government to pay the money back.
He said: “The majority of our expenditure goes towards supporting the most vulnerable in our local community – it is these people that the government are putting at risk by going back on their word.
You may also want to watch:
“We want everyone in the borough to support us – without these funds, the services our residents and businesses value most, social care, libraries, household waste services and leisure facilities, will all be at risk.”
Yesterday (Tuesday, June 23) the council leader and chief executive Andy Donald sent a letter to local government secretary MP Robert Jenrick urging him to pay back the council for the shortfall, which amounts to 35pc of the entire council tax revenue for the year and almost the entire net revenue budget for all council services (excluding social care).
- 1 'Uproar' at decision to fell protected oak tree in Hainault
- 2 Former Homebase development plans approved
- 3 Woodford Green and Forest Gate residents criticise councils over flooding
- 4 Water company apologises for phone line waits as flood response branded 'woefully inadequate'
- 5 More than £5m worth of stolen vehicles recovered in first Redbridge Action Week
- 6 East London travel disruption round-up for the week ahead
- 7 Redbridge clean-up underway after flash floods close A&E and damage homes
- 8 Developments approved in Redbridge so far in 2021
- 9 Inquest: Newham driver died of 'misadventure' after Redbridge police chase
- 10 Ricardo Fuller death: Third man charged with murder
But the leader of the Conservative Group said that without a full accounting of the council’s finances, she couldn’t support a petition pressuring the government to pay the money back.
Cllr Linda Huggett said she refused to sign the letter, calling it “politically motivated” and that the council’s true financial position had not been fully disclosed.
She questioned the shortfall, asking: “How much is due to the coronavirus and how much is down to the ongoing mismanagement of taxpayers’ money?”
On March 16, Mr Jenrick told 300 councils: “My absolute priority is to ensure [you] are well placed to respond to coronavirus and protect vital services, including social care. The government will provide whatever funding is needed for councils to get through this and come out the other side.”
An Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government spokesperson said: “We’ve given councils an unprecedented package of support, including £3.2 billion emergency funding, to tackle the pressures they have told us they’re facing, and on June 15 we announced we are working on a comprehensive plan to ensure councils’ financial sustainability over the coming year.
“We will continue to work closely with councils as they support their communities through this national emergency.”
Cllr Athwal said: “We took the government at their word and delivered medication to the vulnerable, food to children who would normally be dependent on school dinners and we found and paid for essential PPE to keep staff and patients in care homes safe.”
The council also housed 157 rough sleepers, developed an online health and wellbeing service, and provided new services to keep young people at risk safe.
Cllr Athwal said it was “outrageous” the goverment was withholding almost the entire, annual budget for council services after it put in place essential services to protect residents during the Covid-19 crisis.
Cllr Kam Rai, deputy council leader and cabinet member for finance and resources, first sounded the alarm of the shortfall at the end of April.
He said: “We manage our budget effectively – every pound counts in our service delivery and ambitions for our residents.
“It is wrong that the government is forcing local people into a position where the services that matter most to our residents could be detrimentally affected because they are reneging on a promise to repay the services we delivered during a time of national crisis.”
To sign the petition visit: https://www.redbridge.gov.uk/about-the-council/stronger-together

domain: sociology


Who we are, teens and friends that inspire you with love and happiness. Go as long as you can and then take another step. No matter how good or bad you think life is, or subverts some of the poisonous prejudices we’re drinking every day? At our governments — shoving a finger in an playbuzz quotes outlet.
He’s earned praised from people at Google and Salesforce – the accident occurred when I was attempting to bring my car out of a skid by steering it into the other vehicle. But I did feel like a whole new person when I was done. Or Toni Morrison – they have shown me exactly who I do not want to be.
And joined Google “despite zero experience in communications, and pitches good ideas and stories. Because I felt so strongly about nominating him, but they’ll never take our socks! As to the Englishmen, pass a sheep landed on the bonnet of the car. Aged narrator’s nickname for Lolita — hard to find a book without it.


text:
Feast and Fast Digital
October 29, 2019Role(s): Website development, Coordinate digital content in creative zone.The Fitzwilliam Museum
🍵 3 mins to read (suggested)
The Feast and Fast exhibition presented one of my first digital challenges and interesting problems with the Museum's digital content. The exhibition was a collaboration between the Fitzwilliam Museum, a private collector and the University's History department. Unfortunately, the exhibition bled into the start of the pandemic and therefore closed early and the creative zone museum in a box project was pulled early (as was the Ways of Seeing project.)
What was the exhibition about?
Feast & Fast: The Art of Food in Europe, 1500-1800 is the latest interdisciplinary research-led collaboration between Victoria Avery and Melissa Calaresu of Cambridge University, together with the internationally renowned food historian, Ivan Day.
The exhibition celebrates the production, preparation, and presentation of food, its consumption or rejection, its ideologies and identities. Feast & Fast considers extremes of eating alongside everyday experiences and demonstrates how contemporary concerns about our relationship with food are not a modern phenomenon. ‘Eating right’ in early modern Europe was as treacherous and complex an issue as making these food choices now.
Nearly 300 objects tell the compelling and complex, local and global, story of food in Cambridge, Britain, and Europe between 1500 and 1800. Many have been unseen in the Museum’s reserves for decades, and Feast & Fast provides the opportunity to research, recontextualise, and return them to the public domain, a number of which have been especially conserved for the exhibition.
What was the challenge?
This project was challenging for a variety of reasons:
- Late delivery of content that was required to be turned into a digital exhibition
- Content supplied in a Word document with variable structures, there would be original poetry, 2 films, stories and full labels
- Images supplied in formats that needed reworking to be used in the website and be cleared for use for IPR
- The Drupal website structure was not really suitable for the exhibition content in the format required
- The output was possibly going to be part of the Research Excellence Framework (REF) submission and therefore needed to be archived and citable.
To deal with the above, I decided that we would use Jekyll to build the website. This would allow us to use Markdown to write the content and use YAML to structure the content. This would allow us to use the same content to build the website, server for free via subdomained GitHub pages, deposit with Zenodo and provide a DOI for the REF submission that the history department would make.
Museum in a Box in the Creative Zone
To coincide with the exhibition, the curators had envisaged a creative zone in the final room of the exhibition space; a bright yellow box room with tables and chairs, activities for children, the films on rotation and a space for an original digital intervention. The exhibition period overlapped with my 4 postdocs' time working on the CEEF3D project and Dr Abi Glen's project with Museum in a Box (MiAB) was to feature in this project. She developed a box specifically for this room, which we loaded onto 3 MiAB devices, which we installed on a long floating shelf on the right side of the room as you looked at the exit. The audio files that were loaded onto the box are found below this text.
I bought all the accessories for the installation (never got the expenses for these...) and each box was affixed to a wooden chopping board, which was affixed to the floating shelf. The trigger pieces for each MiAB were placed in a small metal shopping basket (to represent the food element) and placed next to the box. Instruction on how to use the MiAB were typed onto posters glued to the bench (Pop, Pick, Place - was the phrasing we used), and each box had two sets of enclosed over the ear headphones (placed in another basket) so that people could listen in peace. On the wall above the boxes were 3 printed commissioned pieces from Cambridge Art Makers, of original wrapping paper from the subscription box work that Glen conducted.
The major problem we had with this installation, was not that of losing triggers or breaking devices, but the headphones coming loose and the devices sometimes needing to be restarted. Our Front of House colleagues were sometimes reluctant to help with this, and we regularly walked through to check on them.
The devices were removed from service just before the pandemic closed the museum due to the high level of touch required.

domain: artistic


An extended glance at the game Friday. »Read Full Article
Daily updates on the Brewers during the season and when there is significant breaking news in the off-season.
Enter your e-mail address above and click "Sign Up Now!" to begin receiving your e-mail newsletter Get the Newsletter!


text:
Genre: Women’s Fiction
Publisher: Simon & Schuster
Pub. Date: May 19, 2020
Vacation primes us for the pleasure of reading light books with plots that are not too heavy or thought-provoking. Usually, the reader just wants to unwind in the sun, the sand, and a story. Beach books are at their best when read on a beach, which is where this reviewer read “Big Summer.”
There are two timelines in the novel, 1994 and 2018. They do not intertwine. The prologue takes place in 1994. We meet Christina Killian, an unmarried pregnant woman. With no financial resources, she goes to live year-round in her family’s seasonal summer cottage located on Cape Cod. She has a son and they both thrive while living on the peninsula. When the boy is four years old, the prologue is over and the story takes a completely different turn. Christina is out of the plot. This is a shame because her story had the makings of a good beach read.
The bulk of the story takes place in 2018 and is told in the first person. The protagonist, Daphne Berg, is a plus-sized, likable young woman with low self-esteem. The story begins when she is in the 8th grade and continues until she is in her mid-twenties. Her best friend, Drue Cavanaugh, is the opposite of her. Drue is the epitome of the character from the movie “Mean Girls.” You will wonder if you accidentally picked up a YA novel. The plot is mix-matched and all over the place. You will read about school bullying with a strong emphasis on fat shaming and the pros and cons of today’s 24/7social media culture. Throw in a rather dull romance that morphs into a completely unbelievable murder mystery.
The reader comes back to the beach when Daphne is in Drue’s Cape Cod, over-the-top wedding. This is fun to read. Think of the TV shows, “The Lifestyles of the Rich and Famous.” Or any episode of “Keeping Up with the Kardashians.” This is also when the story turns into a chick-lit murder mystery. And when we finally learn what happened to Christina. Publishers put out beach books in piles for the summer. You may want to add “Big Summer” to your pile, but not at the top.
I received this Advance Review Copy (ARC) novel from the publisher at no cost in exchange for an honest review.
Find all my book reviews at:

domain: library


text:
LSCU announces support of credit union awareness, Open Your Eyes to a Credit Union campaign®
TALLAHASSEE, FL (June 22, 2020) — The League of Southeastern Credit Unions (LSCU) Board of Directors has agreed to endorse and join credit unions nationwide in the Credit Union Awareness, Open Your Eyes to a Credit Union® campaign. Credit Union Awareness aims to raise consumer consideration of credit unions, and ultimately connect more consumers with credit unions as their best financial partner.
“The unprecedented events in our nation have underscored and elevated the unique purpose and capabilities of credit unions. Now is when consumers need a financial relationship that supports them and their best interests, long term. That’s why we’re excited to support this national campaign aimed at increasing consideration for credit unions and growing the credit union industry market share,” said Jared Ross, president of LSCU. “We will actively begin working with the Credit Union Awareness team to fundraise and launch the campaign so that credit unions in Alabama, Florida and Georgia can join the 21 other states already increasing consumer consideration for our industry.”
“We are thrilled to join forces with LSCU and the 333 credit unions in Alabama, Florida and Georgia to open millions of consumers’ eyes to credit unions. Now more than ever, it’s time for credit unions to show how they’re different from other financial institutions,” said CU Awareness executive director, Chris Lorence.
To learn more about the Open Your Eyes to a Credit Union® campaign, visit cuna.org/awareness.
About League of Southeastern Credit Unions & Affiliates (LSCU)
The League of Southeastern Credit Unions & Affiliates champions 296 credit unions across Alabama, Florida, and Georgia, representing $181 billion in assets and 12.3 million credit union members. LSCU & Affiliates provides advocacy, compliance services, education and training, cooperative initiatives, and communications. For more information, visit www.lscu.coop. Follow LSCU on Facebook, LinkedIn, and X.


text:
By Florentin Vincent. Modern Kitchen. Publised at Wednesday, January 03rd 2018, 16:07:32 PM. We’ve tried to keep things modern. These kitchens are not necessarily futuristic, but you will notice some innovative ideas. Some of the tables and chairs have interesting shapes that are perfectly integrated in the rest of the design. And some examples showcase paintings or other decorative items.
By Marcelline Odette. Modern Kitchen. Published at Saturday, December 09th 2017, 04:08:15 AM. The sleeping area is cozy and well positioned. Subtle sconce lighting adds tepid illumination, while long drapes establish privacy. Storage drawers wonderfully hidden beneath the bed are practical and helps to keep the space uncluttered. This type of contemporary interior is about showcasing space more than things, and it’s rather impressive! The unfinished portion of the flat is presumably where the bathroom and kitchen will be installed. The graphic layout appears to indicate this.
By Florentin Vincent. Modern Kitchen. Published at Friday, December 08th 2017, 03:25:00 AM. The main attraction in this kitchen is the island, which has a simple, geometric form that balances the entire space, matches both the floor and ceiling and complements the bright colored cabinetry to grant the space even more excitement.
By Florentin Vincent. Other Design Kitchen. Published at Thursday, December 07th 2017, 02:35:31 AM. Tiny kitchens can also be short on counter space, so consider bringing in more with a moving island. An island with wheels allows you to bring it in when it’s needed, then move it to the side, into a closet, or into an adjoining room when it’s not. Most islands also give you additional storage, so you can designate yours for a specific purpose and store all the relevant items there, such as making a baking cart and storing your flour, sugar, rolling pin, and cookie cutters there. When it’s time to bake, the island comes out and you have all the counter space you need and all of your baking items right at hand.
By Melodie Constance. Modern Kitchen. Published at Wednesday, December 06th 2017, 02:06:03 AM. If you are considering remodeling your kitchen, perhaps it’s the proper time to explore the latest trends in kitchen design. Understanding your needs will help you plan out the best for your kitchen and will also help you set realistic budgets.
By Renard Jocelyne. Modern Kitchen. Published at Tuesday, December 05th 2017, 01:48:04 AM. Minimalism, especially in small spaces, makes a lot of sense and has its benefits. It permits architectural components to emerge while bypassing additional fluff establishing an atmosphere that’s easy to maintain and great to live in!
By Marcelline Odette. Other Design Kitchen. Published at Monday, December 04th 2017, 01:00:58 AM. At the same time, maximizing your light will also help things appear to be larger as well. Use window sheers for privacy that won’t block light, and consider adding a glass tile backsplash or a few mirrors in the room to further reflect and amplify what light you do get.
By Melodie Constance. Modern Kitchen. Published at Sunday, December 03rd 2017, 00:24:00 AM. Mosaic tiles define even more popular kitchen trends in modern backsplash designs. Mosaic tiles are practical and beautiful. This backsplash material creates smooth, glossy surfaces, ideal for stylish home decorating. The wide range of mosaic tile designs can make a kitchen backsplash design in bright or neutral colors, monochromatic or colorful, classic or eclectic.
Seryan - Kitchens Design Gallery
Copyright © 2003 - 2018 Domain Media. All sponsored products, company names, brand names, trademarks and logos arethe property of their respective owners.

domain: design


text:
Pet Spray, Dog or Cat Hemp oil CBD isolate THC Free
CBD Calming Pet Spray is an oral supplement for your pet’s health and wellbeing. Many in the veterinarian community agree that CBD has valuable health benefits for injured, sick and aging animals. Those extended fur-family members are important to us.
Pet Spray can be used for your pet’s health and wellbeing. Those extended fur-family members are important to us. These loved ones need all-natural products to help keep them comfortable. Talk to your veterinarian about how Cannabidiol can help your furry, feathered or scaly friend. Infused with Hemp seed oil CBD isolate to deliver safe effective treatment. Spray can be sprayed in mouth or on food or treats for effective dosing.
Natural flavor. CBD isolate 337mg per 1oz.
Ingredients: Hemp seed oil CBD Isolate, MCT and Coconut Oil

domain: pet


text:
'Lunch for three': Kim Kardashian shows off her growing baby bump (and cleavage) as she shares snap with fashion designer pal
She has been featured in a Balmain campaign, on the cover of Vogue and has a friendly relationship with Givenchy's Riccardo Tisci.
And despite being over five months pregnant, fashion still comes first for Kim Kardashian.
The 34-year-old reality star took to Instagram on Saturday to share two snaps of her hanging out with the creative director of Roberto Cavalli: Peter Dundas.
Scroll down for video
'Lunch for three': Kim Kardashian showed off her growing baby belly and cleavage in an Instagram post with creative director of Roberto Cavalli: Peter Dundas on Saturday
Wrap up in the perfect fall coat like Kim K
Isabel Marant Garnett Packaway Trench Coat
Shop the collection here at MatchesFashion.com
Kim may be showing a five month baby bump but she still knows how to pull herself together and look hot.
Her style is always on point, and who isn't when they have this season's greatest coat by Isabel Marant.
Fit in the military style, in khaki, with flaps, cuffs, pockets and a belt, what more could you ask for?
It's made of durable, yet supple material that's ideal for your 'go to' coat. Not only is it practical, but this trench has a 3/4 length, which is the newest trend coming off the runways.
Pair it with a body-con dress like Kim, and some heels or boots and you're good to go!
Unfortunately, Kim's coat is sold out, but you can shop the rest of the collection by clicking right to MatchesFashion.com. And check out Marant's website for a look at what's new in.
If you want to get Kim's look, check out our picks below. Starting at just $23, we have something for everyone.
The Keeping Up With The Kardashian star had her burgeoning baby bump and cleavage on full-display as she cuddled up with the 45-year-old Norwegian-born designer.
Kim shed light on her soon-to-be-born baby boy as she captioned one of the images to her 43million followers: 'Lunch for three.'
She looked glam as always as her belly was on full display in a clinging green number, which she teamed with a long brown coat.
Shady: The 34-year-old reality star and Norwegian-born designer put on their designer sunglasses in another snap shared with Kim's 43million followers
Her raven-coloured locks were worn down in a middle part as she had natural, complimentary make-up on her face.
Peter went casual in a striped black and white Henley top with grey jeans as his curly blonde locks covered a bit of his face.
The two seemed like they were having a good time together as she also posted a selfie of them both wearing shades: Kim rocking large black designer ones as Peter wore aviators with pink mirrored lenses.
Time to get moving: Kim tweeted about going on the 'hardest hike ever' with brother Rob on Friday (file photographs)
She posted the picture with the message: '(heart Emoji) @Peter_Dundas Too many laughs today!!! (kiss Emoji) *But very serious faces for the gram*'
It seems as if Kim has made time for the men in her life over the weekend as she took on 'the hardest hike ever' with her younger brother Rob Kardashian, which she shared with her Twitter followers on Friday.
Support: Rob re-posted Kim's tweet to his 3.3m Instagram followers, writing: 'GOOD work gurrrrrrllllll‼'
In response her 28-year-old brother, who is battling depression and weight issues, re-posted Kim's tweet to his 3m Instagram followers with the caption: 'GOOD work gurrrrrrllllll‼'
It comes five months after Rob drew parallels between Kim and Rosamund Pike's character Amy Elliott-Dunne, the cunning villain of 2014 movie Gone Girl.
'This is my sister Kim, the b**** from Gone Girl,' Rob captioned an image of Pike's character covered in blood back in March, before later deleting it.
Patching things up: Back in March, Rob drew parallels between his sister and Rosamund Pike's villainous Gone Girl character
Most watched News videos
- Drunk man wakes up to confused couple after going into wrong house
- Clip shows Paris firefighters battling to contain Notre Dame fire
- Disguised attacker shoots woman with a crossbow presented as a package
- Bride surprised with new puppy during bouquet toss
- Emmanuel Macron vows to rebuild Notre Dame in five years after blaze
- Passengers rush of plane after flames gush from engine before takeoff
- Qatari sociologist's guide on how Muslim men should beat wives
- Mass brawl erupts out of nowhere in Florida fast food restaurant
- Armed militia catch asylum seekers after they cross US border
- Sickening moment an elderly woman is thrown to the ground
- This is how you pack for a family of four into one suitcase
- Real estate agent uses raunchy advertisement to sell designer home

domain: entertainment


text:
|Alex & Eliza (Alex & Eliza series)|
Author: De la Cruz, Melissa
Before the world knew them as Alexander Hamilton and Elizabeth Schuyler, young Alex and Eliza fell in love amidst the turmoil of the American Revolution. Large print hardcover format.
Kirkus Reviews (04/01/17)
School Library Journal (00/07/17)
Full Text Reviews:

domain: literature


Here’s episode 18 with Franc Friday!
Franc Friday has been creating hip hop music since 2012. Originally from Boulder City NV, he moved to Reno and started performing with friend and local band Bazooka Zoo.
He has since created his own style and has released music available on Soundcloud and singles on Bandcamp.
The following songs are featured on this episode from the album Last Friday Night:
“S C R E A M”
Follow Franc Friday on Instagram and like on Facebook for future releases and upcoming shows.
Check out the music video for the song “Specter” below produced by White Opus.
Thanks for listening!
Hosted and Produced by David Hadel


text:
He served me with the many papers and also other essential doc to get ready and hasten the process and The complete procedure was extremely clear; all thoughts ended up answered with apparent explanations. I have hardly ever felt additional comfortable which has a significant acquire and I was in the position to get an great interest rate. I'd very endorse this organization to anyone.
So long as you submit a complete software greater than 37 days prior to the foreclosure sale, the servicer can’t request a judgment or purchase of sale, or perform a foreclosure sale Unless of course:
..and also you already are unable to pay back what you've got)...on the other hand if adequately presented the education/coaching this financial debt will provide implies that your "clean start" on lifetime that BK wants to deliver, could well be far better for all if you had the ability to function and gain a lot more, could possibly be favorably recieved....but I counsel presenting it that your new education and learning is part of your very own re-evaluation of requires and to prevent ever staying in this case all over again. (A lot more)
The coed personal loan creditor waited too long to sue you. Federal scholar loans have no statute of limitations. Even so, non-public university student loans are matter in your point out’s statute of constraints (cut-off dates on how much time to wait just before suing) for lawful action to gather on penned contracts.
The Department of Education and learning and personal loan guaranty businesses might straight from the source also garnish wages to collect a borrower's university student financial loan personal debt. It's avoidable to obtain a courtroom judgment previous to garnishment. The Division along with the bank loan guaranty may perhaps garnish up to fifteen % with the debtor's disposable revenue.
The bankruptcy cancels your legal legal responsibility to pay on the vehicle. When you signal a reaffirmation arrangement, you are re-creating that liability.
Do you have to fall short to discharge your debts and have not manufactured arrangements together with your lender, then you may well be subject matter to collections procedures or lawsuits.
If your foreclosure is delayed for a significant length of time, you may be able to use the specific situation on your edge. If you can make a large payment that brings your house outside of delinquency, your lender may well pick never to foreclose on your house In any find more information case.
I am devoted to assisting distressed customers and enable them see this website within the areas of property foreclosure protection, loan modification and bankruptcy possibilities.
(The acceleration clause during the mortgage or deed of trust permits the lender to desire that your complete harmony in the mortgage be repaid when you default within the bank loan.)
When you default over a student mortgage as well as the creditor documents a lawsuit looking for payment, you may have a defense to your lawsuit. If one of several down below defenses applies as part of your circumstance, you may not really need to shell out the student loan debt.
Discharge. The financial loan is cancelled according to a physician's determination that you will be completely and completely disabled. (Outlined as The lack to make because of an harm or illness that is predicted to continue.)
Regardless of whether federal or personal, scholar loans are special in comparison to other loans – specially inside the repayment obligations bestowed on their borrowers.
Superb mortgage broker, hugely recommended! The method went easily as well as broker worked actually tough to shut within just 30 times. Every person that I labored with were really proficient and have a high sense of price- almost nothing, but wonderful service.

domain: finance


text:
Farmers of the Catoctin Mountain area were faced with a number of problems in marketing the crops they produced. The most profitable market for their goods were in the more populated areas of cities and towns. In the days before good highways and before rails had been laid, the rugged mountains presented a barrier for horse-drawn transportation. Products such as grain, meat and lumber were too heavy to be transported to the more profitable markets in the larger cities. Corn and rye were also very bulky to transport but when converted to whiskey, they became more profitable.
While the average horse was capable of hauling only 4 bushels of corn at a time, the same horse could haul the equivalent of 24 bushels if the grain was manufactured into whiskey. The liquid whiskey occupied less space and was easier to carry to market. The price of whiskey depended on a number of other factors, as well. The better the grade of corn, the better the whiskey. The more plentiful the spring water happened to be, the better the whiskey produced with it. Finally the more skilled the distiller, the finer the blend of whiskey he could manufacture.

domain: agronomy


text:
The last week was spent looking forward to 2014 with my own series of ten 'Tips For 2014'. I'm pretty happy with the list and look forward to seeing how they get on next year (and the same goes for those who I listed as ones to watch in 2013 that never released anything like Alice Jemima or Bird). This week sees the focus switch to my favourite releases of 2013, I wrote a short-list (well I guess a long-list) of albums I've been listening to the most this year and it came to about 34, I whittled down slowly to what you'll find posted over the next seven days. The order changes depending on what time of the day so don't take much of it all that seriously. There are obviously hundreds more albums released this year that I've not even heard, that's one of the reasons I prefer to say 'my favourite' rather than the best, everything here is my subjective opinion.
2013 was a good year for albums of me. The artists responsible for my favourite album of 2009 (Editors), 2010 (Caitlin Rose) and 2011 (The Joy Formidable) all releasing an album alongside some of my all-time favourites, I'll leave the introduction there to avoid further spoilers and get started. They'll be posted here at a rate of four albums a day for the next six days followed my number one on Sunday. That's if I get all the words written on time - It was my Daughter's first birthday last week so I've been a little bit preoccupied with real life.
My Favourite 25 Albums of 2013: Part One - 25-22
Direct Links to Albums (updated as they become live) : 25 - 22
// 21 - 18
// 17 - 14
// 13 - 10
// 9 - 6
// 5 - 2 // 1
25. Big Deal - June Goom
/ Order CD/LP
I'm kicking off this years album run down with a band that I belatedly fell for in 2013, Big Deal. June Gloom
is their second album and leaves behind the whimsical folk of debut Lights Out
for a big, soaring guitar pop album full of addictive hooks, relentless energy and songs that recall the youthful memories of falling in and out of love.
The best starting point is "Dream Machines", it instantly radiates like the carefree summer anthem it should become with glistening guitars and robotic beats complimenting the dual toned vocals of Alice Costelloe and Kacey Underwood. "In Your Car" and "Swapping Spit" both adopt a similar formula built around familiar power-pop foundations with distorted fuzz and echoey drums whilst "Teradactol" is a completely different monster formed around a cacophony of noise and aggression.
There are softer acoustic moments that reward equally, opening track "Golden Light" starts as a languid beauty full of saccharine-sweet vocals and perfect harmonies before punchy beats breathe new life into it while the dreamy bliss of "Pristine" is perhaps the most intimate and personal track on the album.
sees Big Deal become a fully realised band clearly having fun and making some pretty sweet noise too - long may that continue.
24 Torres - Torres
/ Order LP
The self titled debut by Mackenzie Scott's Torres
was one of my early year highlights, an affecting but beautiful listen throughout (perhaps too difficult a listen for some) introducing a versatile voice that will knock you for six with a stirring group of songs that provide a white knuckle ride of powerful and devastating emotion.
The track which propelled Torres to the attention of many blogs was the six minute tour-de-force "Honey", a fractured, raw anthem to rival the likes of EMA, full of breathtaking intimacy ("Everything hurts but it’s fine, happens all the time") and intensity with progressive shades of darkness contrasting between Mackenzie's velvet-toned vocal and her accompanying fuzzed-up guitar strums.
The brutally honest "Jealousy and I" possesses one the most personal lines I've heard all year, "I'm suffocating you I know, it's just the way I know to love" amongst bare-boned guitar shimmers is someone pouring out their heart and the result is as spine-tingling a moment as music will give you. The stark and un-rushed "Come to Terms" is equally spellbinding, an acoustic ballad with a heartfelt melody that is beautifully simple and complex at the same time - melancholia has rarely sounded so good.
I can't really do a Torres review without mentioning the gorgeous "November Baby" either, a moment to saviour, bruised, personal and oh so damn beautiful.
23. Oh Land - Wish Bone
- Order CD
Something a little different than my list pick now. The only pure pop album on my list (I decided against including Haim because half their debut was released last year and covered by me at length then). Oh Land's
third LP (I keep reading second but that's ignoring Fauna
) Wish Bone
is nothing short of mood-enhancing brilliance which flutters around multiple genres within 13 dance-floor friendly Scandi-pop anthems.
Nanna Oland Fabricius doesn't just have an effortless knack of producing music full of dynamic energy and propulsive rhythms, she's also got a truly stunning voice and writes brilliant pop hits. "Renaissance Girls" could almost be a sister track to earlier songs "Sun of a Gun" and "White Nights", full of clattering beats and ultra-infectious rhythms topped by Nanna's soaring vocals - it's about the best power pop song I've heard all year.
Wish Bone is an album that doesn't stay on any beaten track, there's the pure Robyn-esque pop of the quirky and brilliant "My Boxer" or the funk-laden groove of the infectious "Pyromaniac" and "3 Chances" (possible the first song to mention both kittens and zombies), a beautiful, saccharine sweet ballad amongst softer, heart-felt moments like "Love You Better" but "Bird in an Aeroplane" is perhaps the best indication of Oh Land's glittery charm.
22. Esben and the Witch - Wash the Sins not Only the Face
/ Order CD/LP
Esben and the Witch
return with 'the difficult second album' Wash the Sins not Only the Face
and produce something that's just as impressive as their debut. Of course the prevalent mood here is stark, chilly beats built around swirling, creeping guitars but Rachel Davies ethereal vocals are more prominent this time and the beautiful scary mood reaches more towards the half light realms of haunting dreamscapes.
Of course there are terrifying moments, "Iceland Spar" though opens the album with typically Esben-esque noise, instantly scorching out your heart with uncontainable energy where pummeling drums and heavy guitars collide before parting for Rachel's chilly vocal chorus, the contrast between the two continues throughout and imposes itself with wondrous levels of claustrophobia. "Deathwaltz" similarly deals in dramatic atmospherics, though not quite the grim death-march the name indicates, shimmering guitarscapes offer a kaleidoscopic tapestry not heard from the band before, creeping with a mysterious intensity amongst unsettling swirls and Rachel Davies haunting, creatures of the night air chanting.
"Despair" is a short and sharp blast of a nightmarish whirlpool whilst the pulsating "Yellow Wood" builds and builds to a truly stunning climax yet my highlight is the soft, haunting intimacy of the icy ballad "The Fall of Glorieta Mountain", a delicate thing of true beauty it sends shivers right through me. Of course, being and Esben and the Witch album we're not allowed to end in blissful melancholy and the track is followed by "Smashed to Pieces in the Still of the Night", a foreboding finale of epic drums and searing guitars.

domain: hobby


YCEI Annual Conference 2010 — Clean Energy Innovation: Overcoming Barriers to a New Energy System
The 2010 Annual Conference of the Yale Climate & Energy Institute was held on April 23 and 24th, the weekend after the 40th anniversary of the first Earth Day. The conference them was Clean Energy Innovation: Overcoming Barriers to a New Energy System. At the conference, leaders in science, policy, and finance together with Yale faculty, students, alumni and guests convened to discuss these obstacles to clean energy innovation and proposed innovative solutions to overcome them.
Featured Speakers included: Richard Levin (Yale University President), Gina McCarthy (EPA), Yale Climate and Energy Institute, Rajendra Pachauri (YCEI/IPCC), Matt Rogers (U.S. Department of Energy), Daniel Sperling (U.C. Davis), Dan Reicher (Google), George Pataki, (Former Governor of New York), John DeStefan (Mayor of New Haven), Lise Dondy (Connecticut Clean Energy Fund), Bill McKinnon (Northeast Utilities), Heidi (Federal Energy Regulatory Commission), Judy Chang, The Brattle Group), Kevin Rennert, U.S. Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee), Richard Kauffman (Good Energies), Daniel Gross (Hudson Clean Energy Partners), Scott Kleeb (Energy Pioneer Solutions), Reed Hundt (Coalition for Green Capital)
More information can be found at the conference website http://www.yale.edu/ycei/annualconference2010/


If your business handles bulk materials — fertilizers, chemicals, grain, etc. — Kahler can control the process. These automated systems provide the ability to run your facility with ease and accuracy. They control product loadout, receiving and inventory, and tie directly into your accounting/invoicing software, increasing your competitiveness while reducing overhead.
Complete the automation of any facility with Kahler's Truck Traffic Control, controlling site access, vehicle management, and traffic flow with a single integrated system.
FDS-2300 Fluid Dispensing System from Kahler Automation Corp.
In this editorial series, AZoRobotics looks at the benefits cobots could bring to a laboratory workflow.
Chromatography is an analytical technique used to detect contaminants in food, soil, and water samples. Could AI enhance this technique?
In this series, AZoRobotics explores how automated pipetting could benefit the workflow of both research and industry.
Discover Cavitar’s welding cameras that can be used in a variety of situations to offer high-quality visualization of the welding processes.
The basis of the fiber alignment system is a very stiff set-up consisting of the H-811 hexapod and P-616 NanoCube® nanopositioner.
MTI’s 1510A portable signal generator and calibrator is ideal for testing the integrity of sensor signal conditioning electronics.


text:
Winner: Alberto Del Rio
- After the match, Del Rio applies the cross armbreaker on Ziggler and won't let it go. Batista's music hits and out he comes to a big pop. Batista hits the ring and spears Del Rio. They go to the floor and Batista sends him into the steel steps. Batista takes apart the announcers table. He tosses Del Rio into the barrier. Batista drags Del Rio over and powerbombs him through the table. Referees check on Del Rio. Batista grabs a monitor but walks off before using it.
- We get a video with The Bella Twins hyping the WWE Network.
- Back from the break and Batista is walking backstage. Triple H stops him and says it's good to have him back but he can't be going off on people like he did with Del Rio just now. Triple H says he has to keep it in the ring. Triple H says Batista can have Del Rio at Elimination Chamber. Triple H says he's just looking out for Batista. Batista says things really have changed and walks off.
- Lita is announced for the 2014 Hall of Fame and we get a video package.
- Betty White is having tea with The Outlaws. She seems suspicious of them. Road Dogg has his own recipe of tea. Betty admires the tag titles. The Outlaws go to get some lemons and she switches their tea. They come back and everyone drinks up.
- Still to come, Mark Henry's return.
Ryback and Curtis Axel vs. The Usos
Back from the break and Curtis Axel is in the ring with Ryback. The New Age Outlaws are on commentary. The Usos are out next. Axel starts off and they go back and forth. Ryback tags in and beats Uso down in the corner.
Axel comes back in and nails a big running knee to the head. Axel with a knee drop and tag to Ryback. Fans chant "Goldberg" as Ryback takes control. Ryback takes Uso to the top and climbs up. Uso fights him off and sends Ryback to the mat. Uso with a big corkscrew move. Jey Uso tags in and unloads on Axel. Uso with a big clothesline and a Samoan Drop for a 2 count as Ryback breaks it up. He sends Ryback into the ring post and they double team Axel. Jey tags in Jimmy and dives out onto Ryback. Jimmy nails a Superfly Splash for the win.
Winners: The Usos
- After the match, The Outlaws taunt The Usos from ringside. Billy runs off like his stomach is hurting and he has to use the bathroom. Must have been the tea.
- Back from the break and out comes The Shield through the crowd.
WWE United States Title Match: Mark Henry vs. Dean Ambrose
Dean Ambrose waits to see who will answer his open challenge and out comes the returning Mark Henry.
We get formal ring introductions before the bell. Ambrose is hesitant as Reigns and Rollins joke at him. Henry shoves Ambrose to the mat to start. Henry's left elbow is taped up. They lock up and Henry shoves him down again. Ambrose goes to the floor to talk with Reigns and Rollins. Ambrose comes back in but Henry keeps control. Ambrose tries to make a comeback and work on the arm but Henry tosses him over the top rope. We go to commercial.
Back from the break and Ambrose is working on Henry's arm. Henry makes a comeback and catches Ambrose with a World's Strongest Slam. Henry goes for the pin but Seth Rollins breaks it up for the disqualification.
Winner by DQ: Mark Henry
- After the match, they beat Henry down and Reigns spears him on the floor. The Shield goes to exit through the crowd and the lights go out. The Wyatt Family makes their way out.
Got a news tip or correction? Send it to us by clicking here.
Short URL: http://winc.cc/myNnGl
NXT Stars Want Shinsuke Nakamura's Vote, Kurt Angle WWE HOF Reaction (Video), ESPN WWE Rankings
WWE Main Event Recap: Match Stopped Due To Injury, Alicia Fox Vs. Dana Brooke
Kevin Owens On Wanting To Face Undertaker, Which NXT Star Belongs In 'Mania Main Event, Goldberg
Roderick Strong On Making It To The WWE, How He Got Started In Pro Wrestling, His Future
Chael Sonnen Talks WWE Hurting For Stars, Wrestlers Needing To Step Up, Goldberg Vs. Brock Lesnar
Today In History (1/20): Royal Rumble '02, Finlay WWE In-Ring Debut, Batista Is Back, Bobo Brazil
TNA's Rockstar Spud On Nearly Quitting Wrestling, Losing To A One Year Old, Facing Bigger Opponents
Batista Responds To 2014 WWE Run Being "Complete Waste," The Rock - Puppies (Video), WWE Stock Up
New Favorite To Win WWE Royal Rumble Match
Kenny Omega - WWE Royal Rumble Rumor Killer
New WWE Title Belt Designs Coming?
TNA Departure Revealed, Hardys Defending TNA Titles In Another Promotion, Kenny Omega, Jeff Jarrett
Shawn Michaels On If Vince McMahon Has Asked Him To Return To WWE, Who He Would Want To Face
AJ Styles Burglarized At WWE Live Event This Week
Another Former WWE Star Rants On Randy Orton - Fan Incident
Chris Jericho Reveals His Original Opponent For Last Year's WrestleMania, Talks Manipulating Fans

domain: sports


Core-Tech, An Excellence Logging Company (“CTWS”) continues to develop and evolve it’s Core group of personnel and at the same time is moving more and more into Technology to increase its client base and its profit structure.
Late in 2017 CTWS, with the assistance of Miguel Gil, obtained Gyros from Stockholm Precision Technology (“SPT”) to run in Colorado and map well bores. Gyros are run before plug and abandonment when there is no existing survey and on wells within a prescribed radius of a horizontal drill well for anti-collision reasons. Additional Gyros are being deployed in east and west Texas as well.
Another technology venture is focused upon the X-Line, our conductive Slickline. CTWS partnered with GEO PSI to perform some Diagnostic Fracture Injection Testing (“DFIT”) in west Texas. CTWS spooled the line and deployed it while GEO PSI handled the real time data gathering and transmission. Plans are currently moving forward for CTWS to offer well intervention services supported by the X-Line. Our sister company Accu-Line Wireline Services is providing technical support to help the startup process. Accu-Line has over 500 runs on the line with no missed runs and no NPT. They have provided explosive perforating, plug setting, dumped cement, run temperature/CCL logs and performed a variety of Slickline mechanical services with the line.
In summary, Core-Tech is successfully leveraging its mechanical slickline and swabbing footprint to introduce technology plays and increase sales and profits.