BEIRUT: Free Patriotic Movement MP Alain Aoun suspended his participation in the subcommittee tasked with studying a new electoral law Thursday while some Christian lawmakers voiced fierce opposition to the Orthodox Gathering proposal.
“I suspended my participation in protest at [lawmakers'] refusal to finalize the minutes of the meeting [and refer it to Parliament] in order to highlight the draft electoral laws that have been agreed on,” Aoun told reporters following the end of the session in Nejmeh Square.
MP Robert Ghanem, the chairman of the subcommittee, said he would finalize and send the minutes of the meeting to Parliament after the second round of Thursday’s session which is scheduled to begin at 4:30 p.m.
For the past three days, lawmakers debated three electoral proposals without reaching consensus on any of them. However, media reports said Thursday that voting took place inside the committee and that the Orthodox Gathering law was the only proposal that received majority of the votes.
The draft law, which has received the backing of most Christian parties including the FPM and the Lebanese Forces, sees Lebanon as one single district based on proportional representation with each sect electing its own MPs.
The Future parliamentary bloc, MP Walid Jumblatt’s party, and President Michel Sleiman have rejected the Orthodox proposal, arguing that such a law would strengthen sectarian divides in the country and allow for the rise of extremists.
Future bloc MP Ahmad Fatfat and Lebanese Forces MP George Adwan commented on Aoun’s suspension, with the former accusing the FPM lawmaker of disrupting the session.
During a chat with reporters, Fatfat said: “Alain Aoun requested that we finalize the minutes of the meeting immediately, refusing to discuss common issues among us. There was an intention to prevent any agreement and he disrupted the session.”
Adwan said that he and Kataeb MP Sami Gemayel attempted to convince Aoun to back down on his decision during a private meeting held between the three.
Meanwhile, some Christian lawmakers blasted the proposal by the Orthodox Gathering proposal, saying in a statement read by March 14 MP Butros Harb that it holds many dangers to the presence of Christians in Lebanon.
“We should be frank with the Lebanese that an electoral law that has each sect electing its own MP will topple the idea of partnership [between Muslim and Christians],” Harb said after a meeting between six lawmakers including MP Dori Chamoun along with eight other Christian figures.
Harb explained that such a law would create a division of power between Shiites, Sunnis and Christians as it would highlight the disparity in number among the sects.
Harb said the law would be “destructive to the Christian presence in Lebanon because it highlights the disparity in the number of Lebanese from each sect and so increases extremism, tearing up the sectarian fabric.”
“This draft law is not that of the Orthodox sect and the Maronite patriarchate did not adopt it,” Harb said.
Both the Future Movement and the Progressive Socialist Party renewed their opposition to the Orthodox Gathering draft law with Future MP Mohammad Qabbani describing it as a “new political system.”
“It is not a new law but it is a new political system that contradicts the constitution and coexistence,” Qabbani said during a news conference in Parliament.
“Our current internal system is based on the Taif Accord which has not been fully implemented therefore moving to a whole new system is not within the prerogative of a subcommittee and cannot be simply voted on during a normal legislative session,” he added.
Fatfat, Future bloc’s representative in the subcommittee, said Thursday that such a proposal is "aimed at inciting strife."
"There is no Christian consensus on that proposal and the president along with some Christian parties has rejected it," Fatfat told reporters before stepping into the subcommittee.
He also voiced his party's opposition to the proposal drafted by the Cabinet and discussed during Wednesday's session saying: "It is malicious without national values."
The Cabinet’s draft law divides Lebanon into 13 medium-sized districts based on proportional representation.
Both Future Movement and the PSP are against proportionality but have shown leniency when it comes to the March 14 coalition’s proposal, which divides Lebanon into 50 small districts based on a winner-takes-all system.
The draft law by the March 14 was discussed during Wednesday’s session amid fierce opposition from the Free Patriotic Movement and Hezbollah.
Speaking to reporters prior to the start of Thursday's session, Loyalty to the Resistance MP Ali Fayyad commented on President Michel Sleiman’s opposition to the Orthodox Gathering law.
"It is up to the president to reject the Orthodox Gathering law and it is a mistake to judge the work of the subcommittee now,” Fayyad said.
"That proposal received the highest level of support,” he added.
Media reports said Thursday that Jumblatt's MP Akram Shehayeb was the only lawmaker to vote in favor of the amended 1960s law during the sessions.
The law, amended during the Doha Accord, has been opposed by most of the country's parties.
U.N. Special Coordinator for Lebanon Derek Plumbly welcomed the parliamentary discussions on a new electoral law during his meetings with head of Future parliamentary bloc MP Fouad Siniora and Speaker Nabih Berri.
"I warmly welcomed the discussions that are now taking place between the representatives of the different political parties, at the Speaker’s initiative, on the electoral law and underscored the importance of the elections taking place on time in line with Lebanon’s constitutional requirements," Plumbly told reporters after his meeting with Berri.
He added that he also discussed a range of issues in both of these meeting including the ongoing conflict in Syria and its impact on Lebanon, in particular with regard to refugees.


text:
The weather was threatening to rain but that didn't stop me. I loaded my bike in the back of the truck, filled a small water bottle, packed my bike bag with electrolytes for the water, two clementines, mp3 player (that I ended up not using), paper towels and a zip lock baggie (for juicy oranges and trash). I put on my Garmin, grabbed my helmet and headed out the door.
My goal this year is to be able to ride between 25-30 miles so I can do some of the fun rides in the Houston area. My longest ride to date was a 13 miler. And boy am I ever slow! I like to stop and smell the roses, so to speak.
Today my goal was to take that 13 miles and add another two miles to it. Start slow, right?
Arrived at Brazos Bend State Park and unloaded my gear. The place was pretty empty. The skies were gray and the temps were in the mid 60s with a breeze blowing.
I got to see ducks and alligators and lots of little birds. Rode past my favorite camping spot:
Rode over a bridge where Big Creek flowed.
|Shelley, that's my Armadillo Dash 5K shirt. :)|
Snack time! Water with electrolytes and clementines. "Oh, my darlin, clementine"
Rode on some back trails where I came across a man walking his dog. I rode slowly past and he smiled and told me Happy New Year. I smiled and returned the happy wishes. I always look people in the eyes and I could follow his eyes checking me out. Thanks, stranger dude! Made my day. And creeped me out at the same time.
Saw some beautiful old live oaks.
Some trails made me feel like I was on the set of Legend of Sleepy Hollow. It was kind of weird how quiet some areas are. And a few of the trails had kidney busting bumps. I even had my shocks switched on the bike but it didn't help. Still nice to see all of the scenery.
I rode to the very back of the park where equestrian camping is allowed. Someone was camping with their horses and had obviously not heard of the leash rules for dogs because his dogs came chasing after me and barking and growling. I thought the little dog was about to bite me so I yelled at it. The guy finally called his dogs off. Ticks me off good too. I reported it to the front office. What if some kids had been back there riding? MY kids?
In all I rode 18.26 miles. I exceeded my goal and am that much closer to my 30 mile goal. It took me a looooong time though.
I learned that it is much easier to ride on roads than trails. I also learned that long rides require some sort of quick energy like GU or sport jelly beans...or something like that. At the end of the ride I could feel that all energy had left my muscles. I was tired and not a good tired. I needed some fuel. Lesson learned.
Got home and unloaded then had a 100 calorie Muscle Milk for some protein. Let it settle then headed out the door for a run.
I took it very slow as my hammies were hurting from working in the yard on Monday. My run intervals were in the 11s and 12 min miles. That's ok. I did it. Ended up with 3.63 miles. Slow miles. :)
I'm not sure of the mileage involved in an official duathlon but mine consisted of 18.26 on the bike and 3.63 on the feet. Where's my tee shirt?!
Chuck and I got salads from Freebirds. They forgot to put the steak on our salads so I had to drive back and get them to fix our orders. Oh, and the floor was wet so I slipped and almost fell and further aggravated my hamstring. Call me Grace. LOL
Watched Biggest Loser last night. Did anyone else have your jaw drop when they mentioned a guy losing 41 pounds that first week? Holy crap!! One week? I know he's big but still. And one lady got sent home for losing 9 pounds in a week? 9 pounds! I would do a back flip if I lost 9 pounds in a week. The weight loss on that show amazes me.
I know not every one likes the show for various reasons. I don't like the game play but I love watching the people transform their lives. And they are so happy about it too. It encourages me to keep going.
Calorie deficit for Tuesday: 1740
If you want to get thinner, eat a little less dinner. :)

domain: hobby


text:
Equilibrium Collapse is a manga issue in the Resident Evil: The Marhawa Desire series.
The two zombified students approach a girl at the Marhawa festival. Grabbing her shoulder, one of the zombies forces her to the ground trying to bite her. A male student shouts at the zombie, demanding he let her go; the other zombie approaches him from behind. Tahir; Ricky and Doug here the commotion from the roof, and rush down to investigate.
The girl is freed from her attacker by Bindi, who kills it with her crossbow. The other students are confused by her actions, but she explains to them that they are zombies (albeit skirting around the word). As Class President, she orders her fellows to run into hiding and alert others. The zombie she shot gets back up. With everyone else gone, the two zombies only have her to focus on. Bindi arms her crossbow again and comments that she recognises them as formerly being two troublemakers. She shoots them again as the hooded girl looks down from another roof.
Tahir splits from the group to handle something, giving Ricky and Doug directions to the central garden. Mother Gracia is in a meeting with her fellow staff members regarding the sudden panic as Tahir barges in. Ricky and Doug arrive in the central garden to find Bindi standing besides two corpses filled with crossbow bolts, and herself covered in blood. She tells Ricky that the sanctuary Mother Gracia was maintaining is falling apart.
|This section is empty. You can help out the Resident Evil Wiki by adding to it. (May 2018)|

domain: literature


The W-KING 50W Super Loud Portable Bluetooth Speaker is on sale right now at Amazon for $58.13. Normally selling for $100, today’s offer allows you to save directly 35 percent on the original price and clip the on-page coupon to score an extra 10 percent discount.
Get a 50W output power and the most recent state-of-the-art technology. The loud bluetooth speaker has four drivers (2 passive subwoofers and two tweeters) and two passive bass radiators on the right and left sides, producing punchy and deep bass. You’ll feel like you’re at a live concert with the loud Bluetooth speaker’s clear high notes, deep bass, and true HD sound.
Simply connect two portable speakers to form left and right channels. Immediately upgrade to 100W stereo surround sound. The portable speaker brings sound to life, resulting in a fantastically dynamic audio experience.
The waterproof Bluetooth speaker is not only strong and shockproof, but it is also waterproof, dustproof, and Sandproof according to IPX6 standards. There is a massive 8000mAh built-in power bank that will charge your iPhone, Android smartphone, tablet, iPad, or action camera for up to 24 hours of playtime. Bring it along on your next camping trip or beach party!
Never worry about Bluetooth disconnection while using the V5.0 outdoor Bluetooth speaker! With a wireless connection range of 100 feet, you can create a fast and stable signal transmission. The built-in microphone also allows you to make a call while remaining hands-free. 3.5mm audio jacks and a TF-Card slot are included. To charge your outdoor Bluetooth speaker, please use a 5V 2.0A power adapter (not included).
With the built-in equalizer, you can control the quality of your sound (indoor and outdoor mode). You can enjoy deep bass, clear mids, and crisp treble by adjusting your audio signal and finding the right balance. By simply touching it, you can pair your smartphone with your portable speaker via NFC.


The Pattullo Bridge is getting a new early warning system to protect drivers from the effects of wind storms and earthquakes.
The bridge is 82 years old, and was not built to current wind and seismic standards, leaving it — and the approximately 65,000 vehicles that cross the span each day — vulnerable.
tap here to see other videos from our team.
“The seismic warning and monitoring system will help improve safety of the current bridge by closing it to vehicles and pedestrians during a seismic or high-wind event,” said TransLink spokesperson Dan Mountain. “This work is part of TransLink’s mandate to maintain the safety and functionality of the Pattullo Bridge until its replacement.”
The warning system consists of seismic activity and wind warning sensors, bridge closure devices (traffic control gates and fibre-optic cables), and lights and signs.
The sensors measure wind velocity and amplitude of seismic compressional waves, Mountain said. High-wind warnings are given for velocities between 70 and 89 kilometres per hour, and alarms at or above 90 kph. A compressional wave with an amplitude of at least 0.005 metres per second would trigger a bridge closure.
In either of these cases, the gates, which are similar to those at railway crossings, will block the entrances, and warning lights and digital signs will alert users to the closure.
The sensors are not visible, and Mountain would not reveal their locations, in an effort to prevent vandalism.
Construction was completed in December, and testing has been ongoing since, however the bridge will be closed on Jan. 31 and Feb. 1 from 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. for a full-system test. Drivers should take the Port Mann or Alex Fraser bridges instead, and N19 bus trips will be re-routed over the Queensborough bridge.
The system cost TransLink $5.6 million.
The Pattullo will be the only TransLink-owned and maintained bridge that has such a system, but the project will allow the transit authority to test the technology and evaluate how it could be used for other assets and projects.
TransLink is also responsible for the Knight Street, Golden Ears, Westham Island and Canada Line bike and pedestrian bridges.
Mayors’ Council chair Jonathan Coté said that under normal conditions, the bridge is safe, but if there is an earthquake or high-wind event, such as a hurricane, there is risk to the aging bridge structure.
“What this system does is actually makes it a lot easier to quickly close down the bridge in the event of those more serious events happening in the region, to really ensure that the public’s safety is taken into consideration,” Coté said.
Even though the bridge is set to be replaced within a few years, Coté said it is important to have the warning system in place.
“I think we have a duty to make sure that we are protecting public safety as much as we can, so even though it is only for a short period of three to four years that this will be operational, given that we know that that risk exists, I think it actually is prudent that we are protecting public safety,” he said.
The provincial government will build a new $1.377-billion, four-lane Pattullo Bridge just upstream of the existing bridge. The goal is to have it built by 2023, which is when TransLink has said the Pattullo must close for safety reasons.
Fraser Crossing Partners, a consortium of seven companies, was chosen to enter into discussions to finalize an agreement to design, build and partially finance the bridge during construction. The contract is expected to be awarded early this year.
Although the province has taken lead on the bridge replacement project, TransLink is responsible for maintaining the old bridge until it is torn down. The transit authority spends about $1 million annually on maintenance.
The Pattullo isn’t the only major bridge in Metro Vancouver equipped with seismic systems, although it doesn’t appear there are others with a system to detect strong winds.
The province has seismic sensors on the George Massey Tunnel and 14 of its bridges, including the Port Mann, Ironworkers Memorial, Pitt River and Queensborough.
According to City of Vancouver structures engineer Natalia Myles, none of the city’s bridges have early warning systems. However, the city expects to have the first phase of a seismic monitoring system done for the Granville Bridge by mid-2021, and is in the design stage for a system on the Cambie Bridge.
TransLink to repair or replace 20 per cent of Pattullo Bridge's railing posts
NDP rules could boost Pattullo Bridge replacement by $100 million
Province scaling back Surrey road connections to new Pattullo Bridge
Pattullo Bridge to be replaced with province-owned $1.4 billion bridge
TransLink may add earthquake and wind sensors to Pattullo Bridge


text:
Do you like Ben Affleck?
Now you can subscribe to his updates on Facebook! The 39-year-old actor and father of two (soon to be three!) joined the social-media sphere with a Facebook Timeline page showing his nearly three-decade acting career and philanthropic work in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
So just what is Affleck sharing with his extended network of friends?
No family snapshots just yet. But, he has included several touching photos of children benefited by the Eastern Congo Initiative, the U.S. based advocacy and grant-making initiative he founded in 2010 that's focused no working with and for the people of eastern Congo.
He's also included some of his movie milestones, like Gigli in 2003 (Bennifer, anyone?) and of course winning an Academy Award in 1998 for Best Writing – Screenplay with Matt Damon for Good Will Hunting.
Affleck's Facebook Timeline goes all the way back to 1972, when he was born in Boston.
Very cool, Ben—you'll have a million friends in no time.

domain: celebrity


text:
Daniela Obertas is a Rome-based photographer that specialises in food photography. She creates professional photographs, cinemagraphs, stop-motion video and concepts to help companies better market their products and services. Daniela works in her studio or on-location and uses Canon gear and prime lenses.
“I'm very creative and I love to experiment, learn, create new things and work with others who have the same passion. Creativity is what makes me happy. I firmly believe in the transformative power of photography and its ability to streamline communications as it can convey emotions and tell stories.
Before starting a project, I think it’s important to understand its essence, so I work with mood boards in order to get a good idea of what my clients are looking for. From there I can create a concept or follow any brief from an agency or art director.
So why should you work with me? I am well prepared, very patient, very focused and I put my heart into everything I do. I have a clean style and the ability to capture the beauty of food through its textures, colours and shapes. I have good editing skills and always study to improve and learn new techniques.
I want to help you tell a story through food photography. Whether it be a blogger recipe, a restaurant presentation or menu dish, a chef portrait, food industry or a magazine cover, I can find the perfect solution for you.”
Tag your comment using @productionparadise to share with us!

domain: artistic


text:
Family medicine physicians with obstetrics treat patients of all ages
A woman who is pregnant or planning to become pregnant has choices when selecting a physician to see her through all the stages of pregnancy. She may choose a specialist in obstetrics and gynecology, or she may prefer to partner with a family medicine physician with obstetrics.
Family medicine physicians are knowledgeable about a broad spectrum of care and work with a patient’s medical specialists to provide integrated care when it is needed. They get to know their patients well, understand each individual’s medical needs, and provide comprehensive services for everything from a sore throat to depression or diabetes.
Every family medicine physician receives training in prenatal, labor and delivery, and postpartum care during residency, and can provide these services to their patients. They also care for newborns and children, and can be the primary care doctor for your entire family.
At ProHealth Medical Group, family medicine with obstetrics physicians routinely screen pregnant women and new mothers for depression, too. The nationally recommended screening helps physicians determine whether a patient may be in need of behavioral health care. Mild or moderate depression can be treated by a physician providing obstetric care, or they can refer the patient to a behavioral health specialist.
Over time, the family physician gets to know each patient’s concerns, health issues and communication preferences. The patient also becomes more familiar with the physician and more comfortable about sharing information and asking questions – essential aspects of high-quality care. Doctor’s visits can be even more comprehensive, clear and productive when communication is open and complete.
Additionally, when a parent and child have the same physician, the doctor has more information to use when making health and lifestyle recommendations.
When a woman is pregnant, the family doctor and patient have several months of prenatal visits in which to discuss health concerns, labor and birth, and the expectations of the mother-to-be. The patient knows the doctor who will be with her in the delivery room and follow up with her and her baby after the birth.
It is important for pregnant patients to discuss their needs and questions with the doctor in early pregnancy. For example, the patient needs to know about access to her physician and medical team after office hours, what it means when her doctor is on call, and what she can expect if she should need an unplanned medical procedure or Cesarean section.
Every woman deserves a trusted, knowledgeable health care professional who can ensure seamless, dedicated patient care throughout her pregnancy. Family medicine with obstetrics physicians offer this level of care as providers for both mother and child – from the child’s infancy through adulthood.

domain: medical


Express WiFi is a new program being developed by the social media giants which lets Indian phone users buy data from local internet service providers. On their website, Facebook claims to be working with carriers, internet service providers and local entrepreneurs to help expand internet connectivity to the remotest of locations around the world. Although they are starting with India, they plan to expand to other regions of the world as well. As per reports from the BBC, Express WiFi has already completed trial runs with local state-run telecom companies and 125 rural WiFi hotspots.
Well, Facebook wants to empower local entrepreneurs to make use of a steady internet connection which will help them run their businesses better apart from just providing a better internet connection for everybody across the country. Or, to put it quite bluntly, more people on Facebook's internet would mean more people on Facebook. Which is awesome for companies relying heavily on Facebook for marketing and lots of money for Facebook.
Will this mark the return of Free Basics?
Thankfully, no! India did its best to let the Telecom Regulatory Authority Of India (TRAI) know that we did not want to curb the freedom of choice for Free Basics. After much hullabaloo over it, Free Basics was officially banned in the country.
Details on the pricing are yet to be unveiled by the good people at Facebook.


Follow these tips for protecting your privacy on social media.
Wall Street dealt with several major issues in the first quarter of 2022.
Before we can start talking about NFTs, it's necessary first to understand, what are fungible and nonfungible assets?
The year 2021 was one of extreme change.
Five ways to refine your plan for the future.
When it comes to the versatile health savings account, misunderstandings abound.


text:
New Line Cinema Corp. v. Bertlesman Music Group, 693 F. Supp. 1517 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)
August 29, 1988
BERTLESMAN MUSIC GROUP, INC. Zomba Enterprises, Inc., Zomba Recording Corp., D.J. Jazzy Jeff and the Fresh Prince, W. Smith, J. Townes, and P. Harris, Defendants.
United States District Court, S.D. New York.
*1518 Solin & Breindel, P.C. (Kenneth I. Schacter, Alan Seife, of counsel), Blumenthal & Lynne, P.C. (Benjamin Zinkin, of counsel), New York City, for plaintiffs.
Berger & Steingut (Robert A. Weiner, Kenneth Anderson, Jonathan Barzilay, of counsel), New York City, for defendants.
ROBERT J. WARD, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, New Line Cinema Corporation, The Elm Street Venture and the Fourth New Line-Heron Venture ("New Line"), have moved pursuant to Rule 65, Fed.R. Civ.P., for a preliminary injunction enjoining defendants, Bertlesman Music Group, Inc., Zomba Enterprises, Inc., Zomba Recording Corp., D.J. Jazzy Jeff and the Fresh Prince, W. Smith, J. Townes and P. Harris ("Zomba"), from manufacturing, advertising, distributing, selling, or releasing for public broadcast, telecast or other exhibition during the pendency of this litigation, a music video entitled "A Nightmare on My Street." For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs' motion is granted.
Beginning in 1984, New Line produced and distributed a series of motion pictures ("the Nightmare series") featuring a distinctive character named Freddy Krueger. The films were entitled "A Nightmare on Elm Street" ("Nightmare I"), "A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 2 Freddy's Revenge" ("Nightmare II"), and "A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 3 Dream Warriors" ("Nightmare III"). Most recently, on August 19, 1988, New Line released a fourth film in this series entitled "A Nightmare on Elm Street Part 4 Dream Master" ("Nightmare IV"). New Line is the undisputed owner of the copyrights in the Nightmare series.
The principal element of the films in the Nightmare series is the character of Freddy Krueger ("Freddy"), the only character appearing in all four Nightmare films. Transcript of Preliminary Injunction Hearing held August 17, 1988 ("Tr."), at 9. Plaintiffs have spent a significant amount of money creating, developing and marketing Freddy. Tr. at 10. Freddy, who is played by actor Robert Englund in the films, is a vicious and frightening killer who is responsible for the deaths of many of the other characters in the Nightmare series. Freddy has a distinctive physical appearance: his face is exceptionally scarred and distorted by severe burns; he wears a battered fedora hat which partially obscures his burned face and a dirty red and green striped sweater; he speaks in a low, rasping terrifying voice; and on his right hand he wears a leather glove whose fingers consist of razor-sharp knives. Freddy utilizes his gloved hand to slash to death other characters in the films.
The Nightmare series is distinctive in a number of other ways. The series is set in an old, abandoned house on Elm Street, with many of the murders occurring there at night. In addition, the series involves the interaction of reality and dreams. Freddy appears to inhabit the characters' dreams but he frequently transcends their dream states and becomes real. This is somewhat distinctive because, according to the plot line, the real Freddy, a murderer of twenty children, was burned alive a number of years before by the parents of children on Elm Street.
The Nightmare series has been extraordinarily successful and is indeed the core of *1519 New Line's business. New Line has spent millions in producing, distributing and marketing the series and its characters. Tr. at 10. As a result of New Line's efforts, Freddy is a well-recognized character who is readily identifiable with the Nightmare series.
Due to the popularity of Freddy, New Line has been able to further promote Freddy and the series with a number of licensed products. New Line has authorized Nightmare series posters, T-shirts, dolls, action figures, blow-up dolls, cards, tops, chewing gum, stickers, and Freddy killer gloves and has obtained approximately $2 million per year in licensing fees and royalties. Tr. at 18. New Line decides which products it will authorize based on the quality and type of product as well as the financial package.
During the latter part of 1987 and early 1988, in anticipation of the release of Nightmare IV in late summer, New Line decided to authorize the production of a music video based on the Nightmare series. The video was to be released in conjunction with the release of the fourth movie. New Line wished to use the music video as a marketing tool to promote the newest movie. It had used a music video to promote the Nightmare series previously because such videos are a common way to enhance penetration of the 15-24 year age market. Tr. at 19-20. New Line decided that because 40 percent of the Nightmare series audience was Black, it would be giving something back to this audience by producing a Rap music video. Tr. at 14, 21.
As early as October 1987, New Line began looking for an appropriate rap group to appear in the video. New Line communicated with a number of rap groups independently as well as a rap group agency. Tr. at 21-22. In December of 1987, New Line began negotiating with the manager of the "Fat Boys," a popular rap group. Tr. at 22. The negotiations led to a proposed written agreement, which was neither signed nor finalized, by early March of 1988. Tr. at 23.
Meanwhile, in January of 1988, Barry Weiss, vicepresident of marketing/operations of Jive Records (which is affiliated with Zomba), contacted New Line to discuss the possibility of D.J. Jazzy Jeff and the Fresh Prince ("D.J. Jazzy Jeff"), a popular rap group, doing a video based on the Nightmare series, which would be jointly marketed with the movie. Tr. at 31. The music for the proposed video featured a song written by D.J. Jazzy Jeff entitled "A Nightmare on My Street," which was recorded in the winter of 1987. Weiss sent Michael Harpster, the New Line senior vice-president for marketing, a tape of the song.
In March of 1988, Weiss met with Kevin Benson, New Line's director of licensing and director of music, to discuss the music video proposal. Tr. at 33. At this meeting, Benson informed Weiss that New Line was also negotiating with the Fat Boys to do a song about the fourth Nightmare series movie. Benson, however, continued to express interest in Weiss's proposal and suggested Weiss inform others at New Line about the potential benefits of using D.J. Jazzy Jeff. Accordingly, Weiss sent letters to a number of New Line employees, describing his ideas for the project. On March 30, 1988, Weiss and Benson discussed further the business aspects of the *1520 proposal. Weiss reduced his proposal to writing on April 4, 1988. Benson orally responded to the proposal by informing Weiss that the proposal was financially unacceptable to New Line. Tr. at 35-37. Weiss indicated that he would not improve the proposal. Tr. at 38-39.
On April 5, 1988, Zomba released the album "He's the DJ, I'm the Rapper," which contained the song "A Nightmare on My Street." The album became an immediate hit. Concerned about possible copyright infringement, New Line solicited an opinion of counsel. Tr. at 65-66.
Subsequently, New Line finalized the agreement with the Fat Boys. Tr. at 39. The contract between New Line and the Fat Boys provides that in exchange for authorizing the use of the Nightmare themes and characters, New Line will share in the royalties earned by the Fat Boys' song and video. When Weiss contacted Benson on May 18, 1988, Benson informed him that the Fat Boys had been selected to produce the music video. Tr. at 110. Weiss immediately sent Benson and Harpster a memorandum in an attempt to get New Line to change its mind. The memorandum indicated that MTV was interested in doing a music video of "A Nightmare on My Street." Weiss telephoned Harpster the following day to inquire about the status of his proposal and Harpster apparently indicated that the Fat Boys deal was not yet finalized and that he would get back to Weiss. Tr. at 110. Harpster did not do so and on June 15, 1988, Weiss sent Benson a mailgram asking for a response to his proposal and indicated that if he did not hear from Benson by the following day, he would assume that the Fat Boys deal had been closed. Tr. at 112.
Weiss received no response from Benson and learned that New Line had entered into a music video agreement with the Fat Boys by reading an advertisement in the June 25th issue of Billboard Magazine. Tr. at 119.
On July 18, 1988, Weiss received a letter from Seth Willinson, senior vice-president of New Line, informing him that New Line believed that "A Nightmare on My Street" infringed New Line's copyright. Willinson demanded that Zomba cease producing records containing the song and withdraw existing records from the market place.
On July 25, 1988, New Line commenced the instant action against Zomba asserting copyright infringement pursuant to the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. ("the Copyright Act" or "the Act"); false designation of origin, unfair competition, injury to reputation, and dilution and appropriation of property rights pursuant to the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a); and unfair competition pursuant to § 368-d of New York General Business Law. In this action, New Line seeks both monetary damages and equitable relief. On July 26, 1988, Zomba, while not admitting liability, proposed to add a disclaimer sticker to the packaging of their compact disks, cassette, albums and singles containing "A Nightmare on My Street." New Line informed Zomba that it was not interested in working with Zomba to develop a disclaimer.
In the first week of August, New Line learned that Zomba had produced and was seeking to broadcast a rap music video of "A Nightmare on My Street." Unbeknownst to New Line, this video had been produced on July 25 and 26, even though the negotiations between New Line and Zomba had fallen through and even though Zomba was fully aware of New Line's agreement to produce an authorized rap video with the Fat Boys. Tr. at 123, 127. Believing that the unauthorized music video *1521 infringed its copyright and would create confusion, especially due to the impending release of Nightmare IV and the authorized Fat Boys video entitled "Are You Ready for Freddy?" ("Fat Boys video"), New Line on August 12, 1988 moved by order to show cause for a preliminary injunction and sought a temporary restraining order to enjoin the release and broadcast of the unauthorized video. On August 12, 1988, the Court heard argument on the temporary restraining order at which point the Court viewed part of Nightmare I and the "A Nightmare on My Street" video. Although it did not grant the temporary restraining order, the Court was made aware that MTV had been informed of the litigation and would probably not broadcast the "Nightmare on My Street" video before the preliminary injunction hearing.
On August 17, 1988, the Court held an evidentiary hearing on New Line's motion for a preliminary injunction. In preparation for the hearing, the Court had viewed Nightmare I in its entirety and again watched the "A Nightmare on My Street" video. At the hearing, Benson and Harpster testified on behalf of New Line and Weiss and Claudia Ann Carli, Vice-President of Artist Development of Jive Records, testified on behalf of Zomba. On August 22, 1988, the Court granted a temporary restraining order which was to be followed by a decision on the motion within ten days.
In this Circuit, preliminary injunctive relief will be granted only upon "a showing of (a) irreparable harm and (b) either (1) likelihood of success on the merits or (2) sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation and a balance of hardships tipping decidedly toward the party requesting the preliminary relief." Roso-Lino Beverage Distributors v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 749 F.2d 124, 125 (2d Cir. 1984) (quoting Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H.P. Hood & Sons, 596 F.2d 70, 72 (2d Cir.1979)).
I. Irreparable Harm
The first element that this Court must find to issue a preliminary injunction is that unless the injunction issues, New Line will be irreparably injured. In the instant case, the Court finds both that a presumption of irreparable injury exists and that New Line presented credible evidence that it would suffer irreparable harm if the "A Nightmare on My Street" music video was released.
In this Circuit, a presumption of irreparable injury exists for the purpose of a preliminary injunction determination once plaintiffs have made out a prima facie case of copyright infringement. Wainwright Securities, Inc. v. Wall Street Transcript Corp., 558 F.2d 91, 94 (2d Cir.1977), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 1014, 98 S. Ct. 730, 54 L. Ed. 2d 759 (1978); Craft v. Kobler, 667 F. Supp. 120, 130 n. 13 (S.D.N.Y.1987). To establish a prima facie case of copyright infringement for the purposes of obtaining an injunction, the movant must show ownership of a valid, existing copyright and copying of the copyrighted material by the defendant. Novelty Textile Mills v. Joan Fabrics Corp., 558 F.2d 1090 (2d Cir.1977) (citing 2 M. Nimmer, The Law of Copyright § 141 at 611 (1976) ("Nimmer")).
Exhibits introduced at the preliminary injunction hearing establish that New Line has valid, existing copyrights in the Nightmare series. Tr. at 70. Thus, pursuant to the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 106, New Line has the exclusive right "to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work." A derivative work is defined as "a work based upon one or more preexisting works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgement, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted." 17 U.S.C. § 101.
*1522 The Court also finds that copying of the Nightmare series has been established by the fact that the D.J. Jazzy Jeff music video is substantially similar to Nightmare I. Because there are so many similarities, the Court will limit its discussion to the similarities that are the most obvious and important.
Initially, the title of the allegedly infringing video and song, "A Nightmare on My Street," closely parallels the title of the copyrighted work, "A Nightmare on Elm Street." In both works, the central character is a villainous individual named "Freddy" who has a burnt face. Both Freddys have a low, raspy, and frightening voice.
Most significantly, each Freddy has a gloved hand with sharp implements protruding from the fingers. It is this characteristic that is most identified with Freddy in the Nightmare series because Freddy uses this glove, out of which razor sharp blades protrude, to attack and slash his victims. In the D.J. Jazzy Jeff video, the lyrics of the song refer to the sharp implements as "claws" and "nails." In actuality, the makers of the video utilized phonograph tonearms with protruding needles. During the music video, these tonearms are used to slash Prince and Jeff, other characters in the music video. However, the construction of both leather gloves is quite similar. Tr. at 70.
The imagery, setting, and plot of the D.J. Jazzy Jeff video are also substantially similar to the imagery, setting, and plot of Nightmare I. In much of the video, Prince's room is aflame and as described by the lyrics "burning like an oven." Similarly, Nightmare I uses heat and fire imagery throughout. As noted above, Freddy in Nightmare I had been burned alive by parents of the twenty children he had murdered. Freddy brought his child victims to a boiler room. The opening sequence of the film occurs in this boiler room with smoke and flames. Both the video and Nightmare I are set in an abandoned, poorly lit, and highly threatening old house.
In Nightmare I, Freddy inhabits the dreams of all of the characters but transcends their dream state to become real. Similarly, Freddy in the D.J. Jazzy Jeff video inhabits Prince's dream but when Prince awakens he realizes Freddy is real. When Tina, Freddy's first victim, awakes from her dream of Freddy, she realizes Freddy is real because her nightgown has slash marks. When Prince awakes from his dream of Freddy, he realizes Freddy is real because his sheet has slash marks. In both the movie and video, Freddy attacks the victims when they are in bed asleep and is capable of appearing and disappearing instantaneously.
In another scene in Nightmare I, Nancy, the heroine of Nightmare I, is awakened from her nightmare by the ringing of her alarm clock. She believes that the danger to her has passed, but then she is attacked by Freddy. Similarly, in the music video, Prince's alarm clock rings and awakens him from his nightmare. He believes that it was all a dream, but then he is attacked by Freddy. At a different point in the film, Nancy wakes up and finds Freddy's hat in her bed which leads her to conclude that Freddy is not just a dream. In the music video, Prince finds Freddy's necklace in his bed when he awakes, forcing him to conclude that Freddy is not just a dream.
Towards the end of the film, Nancy attempts to alert her friend Glen to warn him about Freddy, but Glen's parents prevent her from speaking with him. In the music video, Prince calls his friend Jeff to warn him about Freddy. Prince yells at Jeff not to fall asleep just as Nancy begged Glen not to fall asleep. Ultimately, Jeff is murdered by Freddy in the video and Tina, Glen and others are murdered by Freddy in *1523 the movie. Following Jeff's murder, Freddy taunts Prince by saying "I'm your D.J. now, Princey." Similarly, in Nightmare I, following Glen's death, Freddy taunts Nancy by saying "I'm your boyfriend now, Nancy."
Additional references to the movie in the video include Jeff going to the movies with Tina, his girlfriend, who shares the same name as Freddy's first victim in Nightmare I. The lyrics indicate that Freddy wears the same sweater and hat all the time. In the Nightmare series, Freddy always appears in a dirty red and green striped sweater and fedora hat. In the music video, Prince, Jeff, and their dates see the movie "Elm Street" which features "Fred" and "Nancy." This obviously refers to Nightmare I, which features Freddy Krueger and Nancy. Finally, although New Line did not heavily rely on this similarity at the hearing, it is clear to the Court that the D.J. Jazzy Jeff music video very heavily borrows from the theme music of Nightmare I.
At the hearing, Zomba claimed that the Court should not find substantial similarity between the two works because the two Freddys are different in many ways. Zomba argued that their Freddy was intentionally designed to be different so not as to infringe the copyrighted Freddy of the Nightmare series. Tr. at 128, 131. In support of this contention, Zomba cites the change in Freddy's appearance, such as a leather jacket and sneakers instead of a sweater, and the rap aspects of the video, including phonograph tonearms, speaker units in Freddy's ear, the fade box haircut, sunglasses, and a gold chain. Zomba also conceded, however, that it was always its intention for the Freddy in its music video to represent the Freddy of the Nightmare series. Tr. at 103-104, 139. As noted by the Second Circuit:
Ultimately, care must be taken to draw the elusive distinction between a substantially similar character that infringes a copyrighted character despite slight differences in appearance behavior, or traits, and a somewhat similar though non-infringing character whose appearance, behavior, or traits, and especially their combination, significantly differ from those of a copyrighted character, even though the second character is reminiscent of the first one. Stirring one's memory of a copyrighted character is not the same as appearing to be substantially similar to that character, and only the latter is infringement.
Warner Bros. Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., 720 F.2d 231, 242 (2d Cir.1983).
In light of the numerous significant similarities between the two works, many of which go to the heart of the Nightmare series, the Court concludes that this is not a case of similar non-infringing character, but rather a situation where the Freddy character and the music video of "A Nightmare on My Street" are substantially similar to the original Freddy and the movie "Nightmare on Elm Street."
Although Zomba has lamely argued that the two works are not substantially similar, Zomba has not denied that the many similarities described above exist. Tr. at 159. Rather, Zomba has made the argument that "A Nightmare on My Street" is a parody of "A Nightmare on Elm Street." As discussed below, the Court does not believe that "A Nightmare on My Street" falls within the ambit of fair use. Accordingly, New Line has established a prima facie case of copyright infringement and irreparable injury is presumed. Wainwright Securities Inc. v. Wall Street Transcript Corp., supra, 558 F.2d at 94.
Although it is unnecessary to make such a finding, the Court also believes a finding of irreparable injury is supported by the facts. New Line presented evidence that it would suffer irreparable harm by the effect the "A Nightmare on My Street" video is likely to have on the sales of the Fat Boys song. Testimony established that the songs promoted by the two videos are in direct competition in the rap music market. Tr. at 102-3. Certainly, with two competing videos in the music marketplace, each video will get less promotional time on MTV. The decrease in air time of the Fat Boys video will undoubtedly result in lower *1524 album sales for the Fat Boys single. Fewer sales of the record will result in lower profits for New Line. The situation is particularly egregious in light of the fact that, unless enjoined, the planned release of the D.J. Jazzy Jeff video will occur within a week of the release of Nightmare IV. Zomba will be unjustly enriched if it is permitted to benefit at New Line's expense from the massive promotional campaign on behalf of Nightmare IV. Again, because there is no way of calculating a damage award to reflect the extent of lowered Fat Boy album sales due to the D.J. Jazzy Jeff video, the harm to New Line is irreparable.
In addition, testimony established that, in many ways, the video has the potential to denigrate rather than promote the Nightmare series. Tr. at 51. It is more cheaply made and less professionally done than the Fat Boys video and portrays Freddy as a character somewhat different in behavior and appearance from the original Freddy. Tr. at 52, 79-81. However, because of the many similarities between Nightmare I and the D.J. Jazzy Jeff video, the public is likely to believe that the video is somehow related to the Nightmare series. Tr. at 52. As a result, the lower quality of the music video, in combination with the changed Freddy, could dissuade potential viewers from going to see the movie. The harm would be irreparable because there would be no way of calculating how many people would decide not to see the movie based on watching the music video.
II. Serious Questions with Respect to the Merits
In the Court's view, there is no doubt that this case presents sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation. The primary issue before the Court is to what extent the fair use doctrine protects a parody promoting a product that is in direct competition with a derivative parody promoting a derivative product produced by the owners of a copyrighted work.
A. The Fair Use Doctrine
The doctrine of fair use establishes a limited privilege "in others than the owner of a copyright to use the copyrighted material in a reasonable manner without his consent, notwithstanding the monopoly granted to the owner." Wainwright Securities Inc. v. Wall Street Transcript Corp., supra, 558 F.2d at 94 (quoting Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc., 366 F.2d 303, 306 (2d Cir.1966), cert. denied, 385 U.S. 1009, 87 S. Ct. 714, 17 L. Ed. 2d 546 (1967)); Fisher v. Dees, 794 F.2d 432, 435 (9th Cir.1986). The fair use doctrine "balances the public interest in the free flow of ideas with the copyright holder's interest in the exclusive use of his work." Warner Bros. Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., supra, 720 F.2d at 242. As described by the Second Circuit, fair use distinguishes between "a true scholar and chiseler who infringes a work for personal profit." Wainwright Securities Inc. v. Wall Street Transcript Corp., supra, 558 F.2d at 94 (quoting Hearings on Bills for the General Revision of the Copyright Law Before the House Comm. on the Judiciary, 89th Cong. 1st Sess., ser. 8, pt 3, at 1706 (1966) (Statement of John Schulman)).
The Copyright Act enunciates the fair use doctrine as follows:
*1525 [T]he fair use of copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by [section 106], for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching ... scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright.
17 U.S.C. § 107. In the legislative notes accompanying this section, Congress listed examples of the "sort of activities the Courts might regard as fair use under the circumstances." 17 U.S.C. § 107 (Historical Note) (quoting Notes of Committee on the Judiciary, House Report No. 94-1476), U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News 1976, p. 5659. One of these activities is "use in a parody of some of the content of the work parodied." Id. Parody, however, was "not classified as a presumptively fair use" and thus, an assertion of the parody defense "must be considered individually, in light of the statutory factors, reason, experience, and, of course, the general principles developed in past cases." Fisher v. Dees, supra, 794 F.2d at 435. See also Elsmere Music, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc., 482 F. Supp. 741, 745 (S.D. N.Y.1980), aff'd, 623 F.2d 252 (2d Cir.1980) (court must examine the facts of each case).
B. Nature of a Parody
Zomba asserts that "A Nightmare on My Street" is a protected fair use because the purpose and nature of its copying of Nightmare I and Freddy was parody. Courts have found that more extensive use of another's copyrighted work is permitted in creating a parody than in creating other types of fictional and dramatic works. Elsmere Music, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc., supra, 482 F. Supp. at 745. The reason for this is that functional differentiation between a serious work and a satire based upon it normally prevents the parody from fulfilling the demand for the original. Id. Moreover, parody is believed to be a socially useful literary genre notwithstanding the fact that many authors of serious works do not like to be parodied. Nimmer, The Law of Copyright, § 1305[D], at 13.90.10.
A workable definition of parody that has been suggested by one district court is that "a parody is a work in which the language or style of another work is closely imitated or mimicked for comic effect or ridicule." Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. v. Showcase Atlanta Cooperative Productions, Inc., 479 F. Supp. 351, 356 (N.D.Georgia 1979) (quoting Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders v. Pussycat Cinema, Ltd., 467 F. Supp. 366, 376 (S.D.N.Y.1979), aff'd, 604 F.2d 200 (2d Cir.1979)). The court, however, goes on to quite properly point out that:
[I]n order to constitute the type of parody eligible for fair use protection, parody must do more than merely achieve comic effect. It must also make some critical comment or statement about the original work which reflects the original perspective of the parodist thereby giving the parody social value beyond its entertainment function. Otherwise, any comic use of an existing work would be protected, removing the "fair" aspect of the "fair use" doctrine and negating the underlying purpose of copyright law of protecting original works from unfair exploitation by others.
Id. at 357.
The Court has serious doubts about whether the D.J. Jazzy Jeff video constitutes a parody under this definition. The work does not appear to make a critical comment or statement about Nightmare I reflecting a unique perspective. In fact, the video does not appear even to be making fun of the movies themselves. Rather, the video serves solely an entertainment and promotional function for Zomba's song. However, it is undisputed that the music video contains some comic elements and "pokes fun" at Freddy. Tr. at 84. Thus, at least for the purposes of this motion, the Court will assume that the D.J. Jazzy Jeff video is a parody.
C. The Statutory Factors
Even considering the D.J. Jazzy Jeff video as a parody, the Court does not believe that it constitutes a fair use of Nightmare I. Congress has set forth certain factors to be considered in determining whether *1526 the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use, namely:
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for non-profit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
17 U.S.C. § 107. The Court will discuss each of these factors below.
1. Purpose and Character of the Use
In evaluating the purpose and character of the alleged infringing use, the Court should consider whether the motivation for the work is commercial or non-profit educational. The Supreme Court has indicated that "every commercial use of copyrighted material is presumptively an unfair exploitation of the monopoly privilege that belongs to the owner of the copyright." Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539, 562, 105 S. Ct. 2218, 2231, 85 L. Ed. 2d 588 (1985). The Second Circuit has also acknowledged the importance of this factor: "While commercial motivation and fair use can exist side by side, the court may consider whether the alleged infringing use was primarily for public benefit or for private commercial gain." MCA, Inc. v. Wilson, 677 F.2d 180, 182 (2d Cir.1981). See also Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. General Signal Corp., 724 F.2d 1044, 1049 (2d Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 823, 105 S. Ct. 100, 83 L. Ed. 2d 45 (1984) (commercial use alone does not defeat a fair use defense); Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., 621 F.2d 57, 61 (2d Cir.1980) (it is "relevant" to fair use whether work was used for "commercial exploitation"). The essence of the commercial/non-profit distinction is "not whether the sole motive of the use is monetary gain but whether the user stands to profit from exploitation of the copyrighted material without paying the customary price." Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises, supra, 471 U.S. at 562, 105 S. Ct. at 2231.
In this case, there is no question that the purpose of the D.J. Jazzy Jeff music video is purely commercial. It is undisputed that the video exists solely as an vehicle to promote Zomba's song. Tr. at 122-23. Thus, Zomba stands to profit financially by using Freddy without making the usual licensing arrangements, which in fact were made by the Fat Boys before they produced their video. The Court's findings with respect to this factor weigh against fair use.
2. Nature of the Copyrighted Work
When considering the nature of the copyrighted work, the Court "may consider, among other things, whether the work was creative, imaginative, and original, ... and whether it represented a substantial investment of time and labor made in anticipation of a financial return." MCA, Inc. v. Wilson, supra, 677 F.2d at 182. In addition, the Supreme Court has observed that a fair use defense is more easily upheld with respect to fact works because the law "generally recognizes a greater need to disseminate factual works than works of fiction or fantasy." Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises, supra, 471 U.S. at 563, 105 S. Ct. at 2232.
It is undisputed that the Nightmare series and the character of Freddy Krueger are creative, imaginative and original and represent a substantial investment of time and money by New Line. Tr. at 168. There is also no question that the series is a work of fiction or fantasy as opposed to a factual work. The Court must conclude that this factor also weighs against a finding of fair use.
3. The Amount and Substantiality of Use
This factor concerns the extent of the defendant's copying. "Use of copyrighted material without the owner's consent generally will not be considered reasonable if it extensively copies or paraphrases the original or bodily appropriates the research upon which the original was based." MCA, Inc. v. Wilson, supra, 677 F.2d at 183. In *1527 the case of a parody, this factor is interpreted more liberally: "A parody is entitled at least to `conjure up' the original. Even more extensive use would still be fair use, provided the parody builds upon the original, using the original as a known element of modern culture and contributing something new for humorous effect or commentary." Elsmere Music, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Company, 623 F.2d 252, 253 n. 1 (2d Cir.1980).
There are three factors to consider in determining whether a taking is excessive: 1. the degree of public recognition of the original work; 2. the ease of conjuring up the original work in the chosen medium; and 3. the focus of the parody. Fisher v. Dees, supra, 794 F.2d at 432 (adopting Second Circuit approach but adding three factors described above).
Even under the Second Circuit's liberal approach with respect to parody, the Court believes that Zomba appropriated more than is permitted. Because Freddy is a widely recognized major character in the Nightmare series, very little would have been needed to bring the image of Freddy and the Nightmare series into the minds of the music video viewers. See Walt Disney Productions v. Air Pirates, 581 F.2d 751, 757 (9th Cir.1978), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 1132, 99 S. Ct. 1054, 59 L. Ed. 2d 94 (1979) (due to widespread public recognition of Disney characters, very little was necessary to conjure them up). Instead of using just the claw or just the slash marks or just the music or just the plot or just the imagery or just the murderous personality or just the dream sequences, Zomba appropriated them all and thereby attempted to make money not on the strength of its own imagination and originality but rather by trading on the imagination and originality of the creators of the Nightmare series.
Moreover, because the medium of video is so similar to the medium of motion pictures in that they both share audio and video, it would have been a simple matter to utilize one or two aspects of the Nightmare series to conjure it up. Instead, Zomba's appropriation of so many different elements of New Line's work, which as a whole constitute the heart of Nightmare I, appears to have no purpose other than to capitalize financially on New Line's original work. See Walt Disney Productions v. Air Pirates, supra, 581 F.2d at 758.
Although the Court is not clear what focus the music video has apart from attempting to promote the single "A Nightmare on My Street," the Court finds that assuming that the focus is to poke fun at Freddy, Zomba has taken much more "from the original than is necessary to accomplish reasonably its parodic purpose." Fisher v. Dees, supra, 794 F.2d at 439. It is quite clear that much less appropriation of New Line's work could have easily brought the Nightmare series into the general audience's mind. In view of Freddy's recognition, the music video medium, and the focus of the parody, the Court believes that Zomba's taking was excessive. Accordingly, this factor also weighs against fair use.
4. Effect of Use upon the Potential Market
Under this factor, the Court must consider the effect of the alleged infringing use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. This factor is "widely accepted to be the most important." Consumers Union of United States, Inc. v. General Signal Corp., supra, 724 F.2d at 1050 (quoting Triangle Publications, Inc. v. Knight-Ridder Newspapers, Inc., 626 F.2d 1171, 1177 (5th Cir. 1980)). See Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises, supra, 471 U.S. at 566, 105 S. Ct. at 2234 (effect on the market is "undoubtedly the single most important element of fair use"). Because the copyright laws exist to stimulate artistic creativity for the benefit of the public, care must be taken to ensure the artist has sufficient financial motivation for creativity. MCA, Inc. v. Wilson, supra, 677 F.2d at 183. See also Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises, supra, 471 U.S. at 546, 105 S. Ct. at 2223 ("The rights conferred by copyright are designed to assure contributors to the store of knowledge a fair return for their labors.").
*1528 Where a claim of fair use is asserted, "a balance must sometimes be struck between the benefit the public will derive if the use is permitted and the personal gain the copyright owner will receive if the use is denied." MCA, Inc. v. Wilson, supra, 677 F.2d at 183. Essentially, "[t]he less adverse effect that an alleged infringing use has on the copyright owner's expectation of gain, the less public benefit need be shown to justify the use." Id.
In evaluating the effect of the allegedly infringing use upon the market for the copyrighted work, a court is not limited to the copyrighted work itself, but should also consider plaintiff's derivative works, either already in existence or potential, that may be adversely affected by the allegedly infringing work. See Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises, supra, 471 U.S. at 568, 105 S. Ct. at 2235 ("This inquiry must take account not only of harm to the original but also of harm to the market for derivative works."); Fisher v. Dees, supra, 794 F.2d at 438 ("infringement occurs when a parody supplants the original in markets the original is aimed at, or in which the original is, or has reasonable potential to become, commercially valuable"); Roy Export Company v. Columbia Broadcasting System, 503 F. Supp. 1137, 1146 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd, 672 F.2d 1095 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 826, 103 S. Ct. 60, 74 L. Ed. 2d 63 (1982) (concept of "effect upon ... the copyrighted work" must also apply to derivative work even if original work not harmed).
As described by Nimmer, a "functional test" is applied:
In determining the effect of the defendant's use upon the potential market for or value of the plaintiff's work, a comparison must be made not merely of the media in which the two works may appear but rather in terms of the function of each such work regardless of media. The irrelevance of media in making this determination is apparent in the following example. Suppose A is the copyright owner of a published novel. B produces a motion picture copied from and substantially similar to A's novel. The motion picture may well not adversely affect the sale of A's novel. In fact it almost certainly will have the opposite effect. It is nevertheless clear that B may not invoke the defense of fair use. B's motion picture has not prejudiced the sale of A's work in the book medium, but it has certainly prejudiced the sale of A's work in the motion picture medium. If the defendant's work adversely affects the value of any of the rights in the copyrighted work (in this case the adaptation right) the use is not fair even if the rights thus affected have not as yet been exercised by the plaintiff.
Nimmer, § 13.05[B], at 13-84-85.
In the instant case, the Court finds that Zomba's video, if released, is likely to harm the value of the derivative use of Nightmare I in the rap video market. There is no doubt that defendants' parody would supplant or at the very least compete with a derivative version of Nightmare I in the music video market, a market in which Nightmare I has reasonable potential to become commercially valuable. In fact, testimony at the hearing unequivocally established that the songs "Nightmare on My Street" and "Are You Ready for Freddy?" are in direct competition. Tr. at 102. Applying Nimmer's functional analysis, the Court believes that the two music videos and the singles they promote fulfill the same function in terms of potential consumer demand. Tr. at 102-3. Thus, the unauthorized video could have a detrimental impact upon the sales of the Fat Boys song that would result in direct financial loss to New Line. Because the D.J. Jazzy Jeff video will harm the market for the authorized Fat Boy video and single, this factor as well weighs in favor of New Line and against a finding of fair use.
The Second Circuit reached the same result in a case closely analogous to the *1529 instant case. In MCA, Inc. v. Wilson, supra, 677 F.2d 180, defendants were accused of utilizing portions of the copyrighted song "Boogie Woogie Bugle Boy" in their show. Defendants composed a song entitled "Cunnilingus Champion of Company C" that was substantially similar to plaintiff's song. In deciding that the defendants were not protected by the parody branch of fair use, the Court distinguished previous cases upholding the parody defense on the ground that the case before it involved competition:
In the instant case, plaintiffs and defendants were competitors in the entertainment field. Both Bugle Boy and Cunnilingus Champion were performed on the stage. Both were sold as recordings. Both were sold in printed copies. Testimony, accepted as credible by the trial court, indicated that Cunnilingus Champion was made to sound like Bugle Boy to create publicity. ... This state of facts is a far cry [from previous cases in which the parody defense was upheld].
Id. at 185. Concluding that Cunnilingus Champion was not a parody of Bugle Boy, the Court stated:
We are not prepared to hold that a commercial composer can plagiarize a competitor's copyrighted song, substitute dirty lyrics of his own, perform it for commercial gain, and then escape liability by calling the end result a parody or satire on the mores of society. Such a holding would be an open-ended invitation to musical plagiarism. We conclude that defendants did not make fair use of plaintiff's song.
Id. Similarly, in D.C. Comics, Inc. v. Unlimited Monkey Business, 598 F. Supp. 110 (N.D.Ga.1984), the Court focused on the issue of competition in the fair use analysis. In D.C. Comics, the holder of the copyrights to "Superman" and "Wonder Woman" brought suit against a singing telegram franchiser and franchisee on the ground that the defendants' skits featuring "Super Stud" and "Wonder Wench" violated plaintiffs copyrights. In rejecting the parody defense and finding that defendants' use was not fair, the Court found that defendants' business infringed on plaintiff's potential market:
Plaintiff and defendants conduct similar business, notwithstanding the different sizes of their enterprises. Plaintiff engages in licensing and the selling of entertainment. Defendants engage in franchising and the selling of entertainment.... There is a clear potential market for genuine SUPERMAN singing telegrams ... and plaintiff has the ability to exploit that market. Whether or not plaintiff now exploits that market, the effect of defendants' practices upon plaintiff's potential market is clear: they satisfy demand, at least in part, and create competition for plaintiff as a potential entrant.
Id. at 118. See also Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. v. Showcase Atlanta Cooperative Productions, Inc., supra, 479 F. Supp. at 361 (defendant's play "Scarlett Fever" could harm a potential market for stage version of plaintiff's book "Gone with the Wind").
The Court finds Elsmere Music, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Company, supra, 623 F.2d 252, a case strongly relied upon by Zomba, to be easily distinguishable. In Elsmere, defendant appropriated the advertising jingle "I Love New York" by performing a comedy sketch on Saturday Night Live that lasted 18 seconds in which "I Love Sodom" was sung to the same melody. Although the court found that defendant had appropriated the heart of plaintiff's jingle, the court held that the copying fell under the parody exception to fair use. Crucial to the court's decision was the finding that defendant's use did not interfere with the value of the copyrighted work:
The song has not affected the value of the copyrighted work. Neither has it had nor could it have the "effect of fulfilling the demand for the original." ... Just as imitation may be the sincerest form of flattery, parody is an acknowledgement of the importance of the thing parodied. In short, the defendant's version of the jingle has not in the least competed with or detracted from plaintiff's work.
*1530 Elsmere Music, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Company, Inc., supra, 482 F. Supp. at 745.
Unlike Elsmere and similar to MCA, Inc., D.C. Comics, and Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., the instant action involves a situation where defendants' work and the song it promotes directly competes with a derivative work produced by plaintiffs. Under these facts, particularly when combined with the other factors discussed above, the Court believes that the parody defense is inapplicable.
D. Propriety of the Defendants' Conduct
The Court's conclusion is also bolstered by examining the propriety of Zomba's conduct in this case. The Second Circuit has indicated that the Court may also properly consider whether the copying was "done in good faith or with evasive motive." MCA, Inc. v. Wilson, supra, 677 F.2d at 183. The Supreme Court has noted that fair use presupposes conduct amounting to good faith and fair dealing. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises, supra, 471 U.S. at 562, 105 S. Ct. at 2231. In the Court's view, the testimony indicated that Zomba's use of the copyrighted material was not done in good faith. The undisputed facts indicate that New Line and Zomba actively negotiated with respect to a music video about Freddy Krueger. Tr. at 34-37. The testimony also established that New Line decided that the deal presented by the Fat Boys was financially superior to the proposal presented by Zomba. Tr. at 39. There is no dispute that Zomba was informed throughout its negotiations with New Line that New Line was also considering doing a rap video with the Fat Boys. The record also clearly reflects the fact that Zomba was well aware that New Line had entered into a deal with the Fat Boys to do a music video about Freddy when Zomba produced their own Freddy video. Tr. at 123.
Thus, the Court believes that Zomba's conduct was willful and done to directly compete with the music video New Line was producing about Freddy. Tr. at 124. While Zomba claims that the D.J. Jazzy Jeff music video was always intended to be a parody, the testimony elicited at the hearing indicated that the term "parody" was only applied to the work after an awareness of the possibility of litigation. Tr. at 35, 105. Under the circumstances, the Court believes that Zomba's making the unauthorized rap video of Freddy with full knowledge that New Line had entered into a contract with another to make an authorized rap video constitutes bad faith.
As articulated in its discussion above, the Court believes that plaintiffs have established a likelihood of success on the merits. At the very least, however, plaintiffs have surely raised sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation.
III. Balance of Hardships
The final element required for granting a preliminary injunction is a finding that the balance of hardships tips decidedly in favor of the party seeking the injunctive relief. Based on the affidavits and testimony, the Court concludes that this standard is met, in that the balance of hardships in this case tips decidedly in favor *1531 of New Line. Of significance to the Court's decision is that this month marks the premiere of Nightmare IV. This premiere is being accompanied by a massive advertising and promotional campaign, including the release of the Fat Boys video. Tr. at 13. It is in this month that many individuals will make their decision whether Nightmare IV is a film that they are interested in viewing. Thus, the telecast of the lower quality D.J. Jazzy Jeff video with the somewhat silly and less frightening Freddy could dissuade an unspecified number of individuals from seeing the film.
Moreover, the Court believes that Zomba will not be significantly harmed if they are forced to wait a few months before being able to release their music video. The Court has every intention of having this matter tried without significant delay and will place the parties on an expedited discovery and pretrial order track. Although Zomba might be financially better off if they were permitted to release the music video now and thereby obtain the benefits of New Line's massive promotional campaign, the Court believes that Zomba is not entitled to this benefit, particularly because it would result in unjust enrichment of Zomba at New Line's expense.
Finally, a failure to grant an injunction now will essentially be denying New Line ultimate relief, because once the D.J. Jazzy Jeff music video is released on MTV the injury to Nightmare IV and to the sale of "Are You Ready for Freddy?" will be irreparable. On the other hand, a slight delay in the release of the D.J. Jazzy Jeff music video will not result in significant harm to Zomba.
Inasmuch as New Line has adequately demonstrated irreparable injury, that the case presents sufficiently serious questions going to the merits to make them a fair ground for litigation, and that the balance of hardship is on its side, New Line's motion for a preliminary injunction is granted. Zomba is enjoined from manufacturing, advertising, distributing, selling or releasing for public broadcast, telecast or other exhibition, the music video entitled "A Nightmare on My Street," performed by D.J. Jazzy Jeff, during the pendency of this action. The parties are directed to complete discovery by September 30, 1988 and file a joint pretrial order by October 21, 1988.
Settle preliminary injunction on notice.NOTES
 Testimony by Kevin Benson, Director of Licensing and Director of Music at New Line indicated that Nightmare I had a production cost of $1.8 million and grossed $26 million, Nightmare II had a production cost of $2.4 million and grossed $32 million, and Nightmare III had a production cost of $4.7 million and grossed $44 million. Nightmare IV, which was recently released, had a production cost of $6.0 million. Transcript of Preliminary Injunction Hearing held August 17, 1988 ("Tr.") at 8.
 As explained by Kevin Benson,
We maintain that we have a character that we would like to keep as long as possible and so we adhere to stringent guidelines in terms of how the character looks, how people reproduce the character. We also are very concerned about making sure that each and every person who purchases something related to our character gets a value for their dollar spent, because what we do not want to do is have people out there associate things with the character that are not of a value that keep them pleased and supportive of the character. Tr. at 18-19.
 Specifically, the deal between New Line and the Fat Boys provides that the Fat Boys give New Line 4 percent of retail sales on 12-inch singles, 4 percent of retail sales on the 7-inch singles, override of pro rata 4 percent over 10 sides on the album, and a third of the publishing with administration in perpetuity. Tr. at 26.
 The proposed disclaimer reads as follows:
"Nightmare on My Street" is not part of and has not been embodied in the soundtrack of any "Nightmare on Elm Street" motion picture. This record is not authorized, licensed or affiliated with the "Nightmare on Elm Street" films, New Line Cinema Corp., The Elm Street Venture or the Fourth New Line/Heron Venture.
 Because New Line has valid copyrights in the Nightmare series, it is clear that it has acquired copyright protection as well for the character of Freddy. See Warner Brothers, Inc. v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc., 720 F.2d 231, 235 (2d Cir.1983) (citing Detective Comics, Inc. v. Bruns Publications, Inc., 111 F.2d 432 (2d Cir. 1940)).
 Zomba essentially conceded access to the material by admitting that the individuals who wrote the lyrics to the "A Nightmare on My Street" had viewed the movie. Tr. at 114.
 Although Zomba contends that their make-up man was instructed not to make their Freddy with a burnt face, the Court finds that the heavily wrinkled face nonetheless appears to be burnt in the music video. Tr. at 129. Moreover, the lyrics to the song indicate that Freddy is "burnt like a wienie." Prince, a character in the D.J. Jazzy Jeff video, tells Freddy that "your face is all burnt" as he gives Freddy a mirror.
 While the D.J. Jazzy Jeff video includes a disclaimer at the end, this Court does not believe that a disclaimer is an adequate remedy. First, there is no guarantee that MTV would run the tape through to its end. Even if the tape was played in its entirety, interruptions, such as commentaries by the hosts regarding upcoming songs, would distract the attention of the audience from the disclaimer. Moreover, the nature of music video channels is to present in rapid succession a number of songs. Thus, the audience is likely to have a short attention span and be doing other things during the presentation of the video. Consequently, a disclaimer would have little, if any, effect.
 The fair use doctrine was originally developed by the courts as an equitable defense to copyright infringement. This doctrine was later codified by Congress in 17 U.S.C. § 107. Section 107 requires a case-by-case determination whether a particular use is fair, and the statute supplies four nonexclusive factors to be considered. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises, 471 U.S. 539, 549, 105 S. Ct. 2218, 2225, 85 L. Ed. 2d 588 (1985).
 As noted in the irreparable harm section of this decision, defendants' video may also harm the market for Nightmare IV, another derivative work. The Court believes that the video is unlikely to harm Nightmare I because this work, while presently running on pay television and available in video stores, is not currently being promoted by New Line.
 Although normally being refused permission to make a parody would not be bad faith because parodists, due to the very nature of their work, are seldom able to get permission from those whose works are parodied, Fisher v. Dees, 794 F.2d 432, 437 (9th Cir.1986), in this case, New Line's refusal's was not due to a concern over being parodied, but rather due to the fact it had chosen another group to make the rap video. Zomba's decision to make the rap video notwithstanding the fact that it was aware that New Line was making its own video demonstrates bad faith. See Roy Export Company v. Columbia Broadcasting System, 503 F. Supp. 1137, 1146 (S.D.N.Y.1980), aff'd, 672 F.2d 1095 (2d Cir.1982) (defendants were guilty of bad faith where plaintiffs denied permission to use copyrighted material because they were using it themselves and defendants used material anyway).
In addition, the Court believes that the fact that Zomba sought an opinion of counsel with respect to their Freddy does not necessarily indicate good faith because counsel was apparently not asked to consider the issue of whether the planned video or music infringed the Nightmare series but only whether the Freddy character (which Zomba apparently told the law firm was called "Teddy") was infringing.
 Having granted New Line's motion for a preliminary injunction under the copyright law, the Court need not consider New Line's arguments for an injunction under the Lanham Act.

domain: law


The quantification of plutonium in technological streams during spent nuclear fuel (SNF) reprocessing is an important practical task that has to be solved to ensure the safety of the process. Currently applied methods are tedious, time-consuming and can hardly be implemented in on-line mode. A fast and simple quantitative plutonium (IV) analysis using a potentiometric sensor array based on extracting agents is suggested in this study. The response of the set of specially designed PVC-plasticized membrane sensors can be related to plutonium content in solutions simulating real SNF-reprocessing media through multivariate regression modeling, providing 30% higher precision of plutonium quantification than optical spectroscopy.
Keywords: PUREX; plutonium; potentiometric sensors; sensor array; spent nuclear fuel.


Joe Biden has no options left. Because his administration refuses to reverse policies that have wrecked the economy, Biden’s only game left is to pretend like everything’s going alright. He will be going to Ohio soon to talk up an economy that most say is already in a recession, racked by historic inflation and skyrocketing gas prices.
But this little photo op won’t do much to polish Biden’s rapidly-tarnishing reputation. Every approval poll has him in negative territory. The administration can pretend like that’s not the truth. Actions speak louder than words though. And while Biden tries to pull a fast one in Ohio, one of his own surrogates will not show his face.
Biden 2020 surrogate and Ohio U.S. Senate candidate Rep. Tim Ryan (D-OH) is dodging the president during his planned visit to the Buckeye State on Wednesday.
While the country is suffering from skyrocketing inflation which recently hit a 40-year high, Biden will visit Ohio to use the union training center in Cleveland as a backdrop to tell workers he believes his policies would help troubled pension funding…
Biden currently has a 30 percent job approval rating and a 58 percent disapproval nationally with the CIVIQS rolling job-approval average on July 3. In Ohio, Biden is worse off, with only 26 percent approval and 63 percent disapproval…
[A] spokesman for Ryan, who is looking to win in November, told Cleveland.com the congressman “won’t attend because of campaign events he’d previously scheduled in Southern Ohio.” [Source: Breitbart]
Oh, sure, he’s not attending because he’s just too busy. That’s tracks. Biden’s only the “President” of the United States. Why wouldn’t a man from his own party, running for an important seat, do everything in his power to avoid being associated with him?
How pathetic is that? Joe Biden will be going to Ohio to push his failed agenda. But his own surrogate, a man who once endorsed him in 2020, refuses to appear alongside him.
This is the kind of event candidates normally rush to participate in. They need this kind of exposure, being seen with the president. But Biden is doing so poorly, this Democrat knows going to that event will only hurt his chances.
Ohio is generally considered a battleground state. There are plenty of blue-collar folks who might vote Democrat, if they think a liberal candidate can help them.
But they’ve been watching Biden sell out the country again and again. They are watching prices rise as their salaries drop.
No self-respecting Ohio native would vote for Joe right now. And anyone seen standing beside this failed “president” is sure to lose.
Not that Ryan is safe at the moment. He is facing a tough battle against a Trump-backed candidate. Any slip-up can seal his fate. So, of course, he won’t stand beside Joe Biden.
Author: Bo Dogan


text:
FREE UPS SHIPPING ON ORDERS $100+
Indigenous Art Sacred Feather Earrings
Experience elegance and grace with these Sacred Feather drop earrings. These beautiful earrings are engraved with traditional Sacred Feather artwork and serve as a reminder of the deep spiritual connection in Indigenous culture. The antique copper plating evokes a vintage charm, while the 5mm diameter crystals add a touch of sophistication. These lightweight earrings are designed for all-day comfort. In addition to their stunning beauty, these earrings make a meaningful impact. Partial proceeds from the Sacred Feather Jewelry Collection go towards supporting Indigenous women and children in their wellness and healing journey. Embrace the beauty and significance of Indigenous culture with the Sacred Feather drop earrings.
Discover the vibrant world of Native Northwest, a Vancouver, BC company that fosters meaningful connections to Indigenous cultures. Talented Indigenous artists thoughtfully design every piece of art featured. Their journey began four decades ago, sparked by a social worker, a rack of postcards, and a powerful vision to bridge the gap between cultures. At the core of this brand are values rooted in Native arts and cultures, infused with respect and authenticity. They provide a platform for Indigenous artists to share their community's stories and traditions through their unique designs, blending tradition with bold new concepts.
Operating on the unceded traditional territory of xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (Musqueam First Nation) and Coast Salish Peoples, they recognize and honour their sovereignty by establishing respectful relationships, employing Musqueam staff, and prioritizing local community partnerships. Join us in celebrating and connecting with Indigenous cultures through meaningful and authentic artwork.

domain: sociology


Voice may be the last frontier for cloud, or it may be the best.
While the industry in general has been focused on cloud computing since the turn of the century, voice continues to be the most popular form of communications, becoming even more popular with the advent of voice activated assistants, natural voice technologies, AI integrations and more.
In other words, voice is still the sexiest app on the planet.
Voice became IP n the 1990s, and while many of the world’s largest carriers, operators and service providers hid the fact the VoIP was driving more and more sessions for less and less expense, at the time (say the year 2000) dropped calls, jitter, and other issues plagued the user experience so “mum” was the word.
In the world of financial services, voice trading and other collaborations based on real time human voice transmissions could drive millions of dollars a minute, or a fraction of a minute. As the buy-side and sell-side talked things over before executing large trades, the market kept moving and there was nothing more immediate than an instant conference call via a “hoot and holler” or “ring down” service.
This technology created multi-billion-dollar value businesses like IPC Trading Systems which connects hundreds of banks over their trader voice platform, even as that company evolves to bring more and more high value digital services, like voice recording, market data, and more to their embedded base while attracting growth categories like hedge funds and alternative trading systems.
While voice applications like “voice mail” may have a bad rep compared to instant messaging and other channels – the fact is voice is growing, even as “landlines” are collapsing, and voice is growing “over-the-top” meaning voice sessions that happen over the Internet, and in ways we could not have imagined in 2000.
These digital conversations are being baked into workflow and business applications in very creative ways, and yet, they will not flourish with good old-fashioned quality of service. This is particularly important in industries like trading, emergency response, and other mission critical real time communications use cases.
Can you hear me now?
Recently, GreenKey, an innovator in secure, quality voice delivered over IP within the context of fully secure private “extranets” joined the FINOS initiative to further grow multi-vendor support for “open voice collaboration.”
This is an important moment, as voice continues to join the open source community, which is become the rule rather than the exception.
FINOS (the Fintech Open Source Foundation) is a nonprofit foundation promoting open innovation in financial services seems to understand this and roped in GreenKey along with Cloud9 Technologies (already partners) to announce the contribution of the GreenKey SDK to the FINOS Voice Program.
GreenKey’s open source SDK is a key building block that furthers the current work already underway in the FINOS Voice Program to define open voice standards for the development community and, according to the companies’ announcement, “embodies the collaborative spirit between developers and the finserv community to make this new voice SDK easily accessible to an open ecosystem of development teams.”
“We are proud to facilitate the connection between open source developers and the financial services community for the benefit of the entire financial ecosystem,” said Gabriele Columbro, FINOS’ Executive Director. “This contribution to the FINOS Voice Program is a perfect example of industry wide collaboration to build a truly open ecosystem based on common standards across end users and even competitive technology providers.”
Leo Papadopoulos, Program Management Committee Lead for the Voice Program and CTO of Cloud9 Technologies commented, “It’s gratifying to see new contributions from other leading firms like GreenKey to FINOS’ Voice Program. We look forward to working alongside other vanguards in this space to provide creative and effective solutions within financial services voice technology.”
A deeper voice dive and competitive spirit
Columbro said, “We believe that voice, like any other communication channel critical to the financial services workflow, is bound to become an open ecosystem,along the lines of what we have previously seen with text-based collaboration on Symphony. Leading vendors including IPC have an amazing strategic opportunity to join and play a leadership role in our Voice Program, leveraging their existing extensive network to attract and integrate with partners in this open ecosystem, with the net result of a better and more complete offering to their end users in financial services institutions. This is the reason with our Board we are actively recruiting leading vendors in the space, including but not limited to IPC, and we welcome them to our Community.”
Asked about the real value in future voice applications, including running AI analyses over voice sessions, Papadopoulos said, “Future value will be gained by the ability to run analytics and machine learning on the call metadata. Call metadata includes the call detail records as well as the transcriptions of the recordings. This will allow customers to better understand what business is occurring within in their voice communications and how to better optimize their business because of this understanding.” And while we didn’t contact IPC, a competitor of both GreenKey and Cloud9 about their take, given that they were not included in the announcement, we did pursue more detail about how "open voice" will change the way voice recording is conducted, including live recording, storage, retrieval and analysis of conversations.
This is becoming a pressing issue for firms, particularly given the onerous task of recording voice sessions over the last few decades. To quote one source who preferred to remain unnamed, “there are still people in the basement with headphones listening to recorded voice conversations to comply with regulations.”
Papadopoulos, a pioneer in the voice trading and voice recording space said, “Voice is already open. Google helped everyone with that when they open sourced WebRTC in 2011. The barrier to voice recording is standardizing on how call metadata and recordings are delivered to systems that want to consume that data. To that end FINOS has a created a ‘Call Metadata Standardization Working Group.’ If we all agree to put out data from our voice system in the same way, it will allow companies the ability to focus on the data instead of different integrations to get the data.”
Aha moment: so this is not just about open voice but potentially open voice recording, which companies like NICE are certainly looking into.
When asked about regulatory evolution, Columbro said, “Improvements and standardization in the way voice data is both stored and accessed means that voice data can be more readily available to help firms meet regulatory requirements. Being able to uniformly feed systems can help general AML (anti-money laundering) and supervisory control systems improve oversight and regulatory compliance as well as assist with parts of specific regulations such as MiFID II (transparency), Dodd Frank (call traceability and integrity) or the Senior managers Regime (demonstrate greater oversight).”
All voice data stored, whether transcribed or not, is subject to the same high level of security as other data, Columbro further explained.
Asked about the risks of opening voice transmissions and sharing voice records and its security vulnerabilities, Columbro said, “Whilst there’s still an ongoing debate on this topic, we believe open source and open standards deliver a superior level of long term security, especially as vibrant communities are able to address vulnerabilities with a greater transparency and typically in a much shorter timeframe than any single proprietary vendor. Additionally, if vendors are able to collaborate on common standards and components of their platform, that in turn reduces the overall attack surface, by simply consolidating and reducing the overall amount of code end users have to interact with in their voice-based workflow. Having said that, FINOS will focus on common tooling and standards, while it remains up to the individual voice providers to leverage the work products of our Community to deliver ever more secure commercial offerings to their customers.”
Even as the financial services industry and particularly trading is being reimagined (to put it lightly) by the advent of blockchain technologies which will have a massive impact on how trades are executed, cleared and otherwise recorded, high value voice technologies and automation through AI and “augmented” apps is just beginning.
Papadopoulos also opined on offerings like the Google Cloud Platform (GCP) and Amazon's Amazon Web Service (AWS), both of whom are offering amazing tools to enable voice command technology.
“They are making it easier and easier to integrate this into platforms. I think we will see these types of technologies move more and more into business applications instead of just using them to turn on the lights at home.”
In the future, more sophisticated software will be brought to bear, including voice biometrics.
“Security is added in layers,” Papadopoulos said, “Voice biometrics can be another security layer but should not be used alone. On the other hand, when transcribing voice where there are multiple parties talking, biometrics can help identify the talker and can be used to add even more meta-data to a transcribed call.”
If you think voice is over, think again. Voice is and always will be the best way to convey information in real time, given the many layers of meaning, including emotion, embedded in human voices. Voice is just getting restarted.
Edited by Ken Briodagh


text:
ACL Live, AustinComedian Brian Regan announces spring tour dates in his 10-year, non-stop theater tour with tickets going on sale Friday, October 3, 2014...
Selma austin shows and events events
Saturday, Jan 24 7:00p
Saturday, Oct 25 6:15p
Friday, Nov 7 11:30a
Courtyard New Braunfels River Village, New Braunfels2014 Legislative Luncheon 2014 Election Day Wrap-Up And 2015 Legislative Session Transportation Priorities For The State Of Texas & Austin-San Antonio CORRIDOR WITH State Representative Drew Dar...
Thursday, Oct 23 8:00a
Pearl Stable, San AntonioBi-Annual meeting of the Texas Land & Mineral Owners Association a statewide non-profit legislative advocacy association located in Austin working to preserve the rights of the land and mineral own...
Sunday, Nov 16 2:00p
Olmos Basin Park, San AntonioOfficial Site: www.GreatAmazingRace.com. “Where Family Smiles & Health Rule the Day!” A fun obstacle/adventure race modeled after the show The Amazing Race...
Sunday, Nov 16 4:00p
Mission Concepción, San AntonioAfter their initial invasion of the Western Hemisphere, the Spanish sought to recreate their portion of the New World in their own image, and in the process created a new mestizo culture that was s...
Saturday, Oct 25 8:30a
San Antonio Training Center, San Antonio4 days Objective This course is the starting point for all new Inventor users...
Saturday, Oct 25 9:00a
Wednesday, Nov 5 8:00a
Embassy Suites San Marcos, San MarcosThe Greater San Marcos region is rapidly becoming a hub of innovation for the Austin-San Antonio Corridor...
Selma austin shows and events Related Topics
arts & crafts | community | business & tech | dance | fairs & festivals | food & dining | music | performing arts | sports & outdoors | visual arts | other | comedy | shopping | holiday | education/campus | tech events | conferences | shows | car show | free | ballet | comedy | dia de los muertos | music | austin oct 19 | free trick or treat austin texas malls | 6th annual tits or treats berlesque austin tx | austin christmas dinner | christmas in austin | today | lunch | austin performing arts | austin event | 10/23/2014 | trick or treating
Hot Tickets More »
ON SALE NOW
Sat 1/24 7:00p
Sat 11/1 9:00a
Thu 10/23 9:00a
Sun 11/16 4:00p
Sat 10/25 8:30a
Upcoming Holiday Events More »
Sat 10/25 12:00p
Project Halloween (Party Bus to Cowboys Dance Hall)
Wed 10/29 10:00p
Zombie Apocalypse Murder Mystery & Halloween Party
Sat 11/1 7:00p
Project Angel Fares Turkey Bowl!
Sat 11/8 1:00p

domain: entertainment


text:
Summertime means fun in the sun, splashing and laughing and sunblock galore. If you're a kid, it's a stretch of halcyon days that you cherish for a lifetime.
For some kids, though, fun in the sun is a restricted thing. Most beaches and waterparks aren't meant for wheelchairs or walkers, and these kids are often restricted to watching from a blanket nearby as their siblings and friends have a blast.
That's all changing thanks to Morgan's Inspiration Island in San Antonio, Texas!

domain: geography