Encroachment on City Property
An encroachment is any type of object or item that is constructed, erected, or placed on land that extends on, or over any municipal land.
Encroachments can include, but are not limited to fences, accessory buildings, fire pits, vehicles, hot tubs, recreational vehicles, trampolines and gardens.
In April 2022, Council adopted an Encroachment Bylaw to help address properties that are encroaching on City land and greenspace.
The Encroachment Bylaw can be viewed online, here.
Why is it important to remove encroachments?
Encroachments have the potential to have significant impact on public lands, create safety issues and cost taxpayers money
- Important drainage infrastructure is buried underground. Residents who build, drive, store items, and plant trees in these areas can harm infrastructure. The City has incurred significant costs to repair damage directly caused by encroachment.
- In areas surrounding our dike system, uncontrolled vegetation can affect the structural integrity of dikes, obscure visibility and impede access for inspection and maintenance, and hinder emergency flood fighting operations.
- In all areas, the green space around homes and properties was not intended for personal use.
The City of Fernie is asking all property owners to remove any encroachments on municipal land.
All residents must ensure they understand where their property lines are to avoid encroaching onto City land.
What should I do if I have an encroachment?
Residents must remove any personal property, objects, or structures encroaching on municipal land, and make alternate arrangements for storage moving forward. Failure to comply will require the City of move the encroaching items at the homeowner's expense.
What if the encroachment existed before I bought my house?
Awareness of property boundary lines is essential when buying or selling land. An encroachment is tied to the land and follows ownership of the property, regardless of how long it has been there, or who placed it there. Understanding where your property lines are will ensure you avoid unknowingly placing items outside your property or inheriting an existing encroachment.
How do I find out where my property line is?
Property owners can refer to any maps and documentation received when the property was originally purchased. To further understand if you are currently encroaching on City property, you may review Fernie's Civic Address Map with Imagery. Locate your property on the map and identify if any of personal property extends beyond your marked property line.
If further clarification is needed, please contact Bylaw Services at 250.423.2244 or email firstname.lastname@example.org
How much time do I have to move my encroaching objects?
Bylaw Services has begun enforcing the Encroachment Bylaw and requires properties not in compliance to have all encroaching objects or structures removed by September 1, 2022.
Are there alternate options or exemptions?
In a small number of cases, a resident may apply for an Encroachment Agreement allowing their encroachment to remain on municipal lands.
The application process allows specific property owners to provide an explanation as to why they require the use of City land.
To apply, residents must download complete the following forms:
Applicants can submit completed forms in the following ways:
- Electronically to email@example.com
- By mail to: Bylaw Services, P.O. Box 190, 501-3rd Ave, Fernie B.C. V0B 1M0
- In-person at City Hall front counter
Properties with encroachments onto municipal lands zoned P2 (Parks & Open Spaces) do not qualify to apply for an Encroachment Agreement.
All encroachment applications are reviewed on a case-by-case basis. Applying for an encroachment exemption does not mean it will be approved.


Information about a Samsung smartphone with the code designation SM-G736B has appeared in the database of the popular Geekbench benchmark. This device is expected to hit the commercial market under the name Galaxy Xcover Pro 2.
The test speaks of using Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 778G processor. The chip packs eight Kryo 670 cores clocked up to 2.4GHz, an Adreno 642L graphics accelerator and a Snapdragon X53 5G modem.
The modification of the smartphone that appeared in Geekbench was equipped with 6 GB of RAM. The Android 12 operating system is listed as the software platform (possibly with the proprietary add-on One UI 4.1).
According to the SamMobile resource, the Galaxy Xcover Pro 2 model will get a Super AMOLED display and a battery with a capacity of at least 4000 mAh. We are talking about the presence of a standard headphone jack and a set of additional physical control buttons.
The novelty is enclosed in a protected case made according to IP68 and MIL-STD810H standards. In other words, the device can withstand bumps and falls; He will not be afraid of water, dust and dirt.


text:
He was the youngest member of the team but everybody listened to him and it was like a fresh air, an impulse, which made everyone work harder. Needless to Young people cannot teach old generation, the majority of people who attend those lectures are older than my husband and definitely, they can learn many things from the comparatively young person like my husband.
Article by pujitha reddyJuly 7, Older people can serve as role models for the younger generation if only the young people can see the wisdom and knowledge the elderly possess.
It is very interesting to know about their adventures and the places they travelled to. The phase we are going through now has already been crossed by them and they can guide us to success.
In certain sectors, like research, teaching, banking etc. However, today is different from the past. Although my uncle is younger, they still respect him and learn from him lots of things.
Because the young will be people who have more chances to learn and use these modern devices than the older do. To Learn from their Wisdom and Experience Most of you fail to acknowledge the wisdom of old people but the truth is they are more wise and experienced than you are.
Old people can change your perspective and help you to cultivate acceptance. Older people are generally believed to have better experiences and practical views about life than the young generation. Albeit that, I disagree with the view that young people have nothing to teach them.
Hence, they can help their old generation to use them. Not everything can be learnt from the books but experience and knowledge from youngsters also matters. In conclusion, different generations can learn many things from each other. He is teaching classes which include government officials, who are older than him.
Traveling was a lot different in their time compared to now. Different from them, younger people, today, can communicate and get information quickly by using internet. In some aspects, old people maynot know as much as younger people. From many years there is a generation gap between elders and youngsters regarding many things.
They aspire to succeed professionally which requires vast knowledge and experience these days. In my opinion, it is a bad attitude for several reasons which will be discuss on the following parts of this essay. They tend to correct your moral imperfections and make a good citizen out of you.
Consequently, I totally disagree with the statement that young people can teach older people nothing. Finally, young people often know more about new technologies and how to use these.
Nowadays, information technology is devoloping on over the world. Nonetheless, youth are the product of its upbringing and the representation of its time. A good example would be the hippie movement in the 60s. You can learn a lot from this steadfast spirit of the old people.
They have already faced the things which you are going through now and have attained so much knowledge about them with age.
Family Values Probably the most important thing you will learn from your grandparents. There is nothing like the food prepared by your grandmother as it will taste like home.
They can advice you on how to cope up with the loss and move on in life.
Therefore, old people need help from their younger generation in order to know how to do everything with internet or know about the late technologies.
Furthermore, not only do old people know a little about modern devices but also they donot know much about internet. Use specific reasons and examples to support your position. People learn through their entire lives from the history, life experience, elders as well as from younger people.
For instance, after teaching several times to operate a smart phone, now my dad has become bit familiar to the new technological development. However, there is a statement that only old people teach the young and there is no the opposite direction. The elderly know that tomorrow will vanish soon enough and that young people are unsuccessful in realizing it.
Life stories of elderly people can even be very helpful to know why things are the way they are in the present time. They can learn from books, their predecessor, or even from their offsprings.Because I am 70 years old there are not many older people left, but the younger generation should learn from us that all the drama that goes on in your teens will mostly all be forgotten about when you are older.
10 Things Old People can Teach you. Article by pujitha reddy, July 7, Older people can serve as role models for the younger generation if only the young people can see the wisdom and knowledge the elderly possess. Young people cannot teach old generation anything technologies.
Finally, old generation can learn thoughts, attitudes about modern society from young people. Old generation cannot know how to use these things if they donot have their younger generation to teach them.
Because the young will be people who have more chances to learn and use these modern devices than the older do.
Older people are generally believed to have better experiences and practical views about life than the young generation. Albeit that, I disagree with the view that young people have nothing to teach them.
First of all, young people can adopt technology faster and they can teach their seniors how to. What Older Workers and Younger Workers Can Learn from Each Other Dan Woog, Monster Contributing Writer For the first time ever, four distinct generations share the workplace: the Silents (who are in their mids on up), Baby Boomers (mids to mids), X-ers (mids to mids) and Millennials (the newest workers).Download

domain: sociology


Integrating Digital Eye Tracking With Personnel Optimization Research
Final technical rept. 1 Apr 2002-31 Mar 2003
MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIV MISSISSIPPI STATE DEPT OF PSYCHOLOGY
Pagination or Media Count:
This award funded the purchase of a Digital Eye Tracking Research System DETRS. The DETRS is a state-of- the-art system that allows cognitive scientists at Mississippi State University to integrate eye movement capture into their personnel optimization research. The DETRS enables integration of video and eye tracking data by capturing video data in a digital format, and allows access to several aspects of the same performance, such as pupil measures and point of gaze, and the ability to cross reference data from multiple subjects simultaneously. It includes high precision eye tracking instruments and components that enable the analysis and interpretation of the massive data sets. The non-linear digital data allows the selection of particular frames or crucial moments and this enables focused analysis and display of the data of interest. The DETRS is configured to maintain portability for field experiments and still provide the data storage and processing capacity necessary for archiving, editing and analyzing data. All equipment has been purchased, is in use, and is augmenting the research of multiple DoD and NSF grants.
- Human Factors Engineering and Man Machine Systems


text:
During a captivating episode of The Voice Norway 2023, Viktoria Birkeli showcased her extraordinary singing talents by delivering a stunning rendition of one of Adele’s chart-topping hits. Her outstanding performance has already taken the internet by storm, leaving a lasting impression on both the live audience and numerous online viewers.
Viktoria Birkeli’s show-stopping performance on The Voice Norway 2023 has taken the YouTube platform by storm, garnering over a million views and earning praise for her incredible talent. Her rendition of Adele’s 2011 hit “Set Fire To The Rain” left the judges and audiences in awe, showcasing her remarkable vocal prowess. Don’t miss the chance to witness her amazing singing skills; click to listen and see if she impresses you too!

domain: artistic


text:
SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY
Plant water uptake experiment. Students carrying out an experiment with a potometer to measure water uptake in plants. The apparatus consists of a leafy shoot in a tube (right), a reservoir (left of shoot), and a graduated capillary tube (horizontal). A bubble in the capillary tube marks the zero point. As the plant takes up water through its roots, the bubble will move along the capillary tube. The progress of the bubble is being timed here, along with noting the distance travelled. The tap below the reservoir allows the bubble to be reset to carry out new measurements.
Model release available. Property release not required.

domain: agronomy


text: Find Personal Trainers Near: Washington Naval Anacost Annex Personal Trainers Local Results for Personal Trainers Northwest Sport&Health Get Your Free 1 Day Pass Today! 4001 Brandywine StreetWashington, DC 20016 View Phone Click to View Phone Amenities & Services 202-244-6090 Crossfit Metro Center 1401 New York Ave NW, Suite 100Washington, DC 20005 View Phone Click to View Phone 202-347-3939 Tenley Sport&Health - CLOSED This location is now closed! 4000 Wisconsin Ave., NWWashington, DC 20016 View Phone Click to View Phone Amenities & Services 202-362-8000 Ariel Bright Fitness 1440 n st nw Washington, DC 20005 View Phone Click to View Phone 610-413-6980 FitnessTrainer D.C. Personal Trainers 1300 I Street NW, Suite 400EWashington, DC 20005 View Phone Click to View Phone 202-759-0442 View More Listings Don't Know Who to Call? Searching for a qualified personal trainer in your area? Call Us for Assistance: 1- Return to First-Page Personal Trainers Continue to Basic Listings Unfortunately, no results were found for your request. Please try again.

domain: geography


All football fans know Kenny Dalglish as a legend of Liverpool FC. But his time at Celtic is less talked about. Author Stephen Murray would argue this is unfair, Kenny played with many great players at Celtic Park in a wildly successful team.
Stephen talks to us about the inspiration for his book, why many of the goals were reliant on memory and second hand accounts and how a young kid who took his time to settle as part of the “Quality Street Kids” became one of the best players in the world.
You can buy Kenny Of The Celtic from Amazon here.
The Coach Home is our magazine show looking at teams outside of L4 and talking to their best commentators. It’s just one of a string of shows on TAW Player, our subscription podcast service that offers more than 30 shows about Liverpool FC every month. Find out more here.


text:
Oct. 31, 1988 - Dec. 29, 2012
The Guest Book is expired.
Emily Yvonne Daye
Emily Yvonne Daye, 24, of Harvest, passed away on Saturday. She was employed at Harvest Elementary After School Care. Miss Daye was a 2007 graduate of Sparkman High School and she was attending Athens State College.
Miss Daye is survived by: her mother, Karen King Daye; father, Phillip Daye and wife Bobbie Jo; sister, Anna Grace Daye; brother, Brandon Phillip Daye; grandparents, Lamar and Yvonne King; grandfather, Phillip Daye, Sr. and wife Margaret; grandmother, Anna Puckett; and best friend and companion, Garrett Wilson Jones.
Visitation will be Wednesday, January 2nd from 12 noon -
3:00 p.m. followed by a 3:00 chapel service at Berryhill Funeral Home. Bro. Joey Savell will be officiating and burial will follow at Huntsville Memory Gardens.
Published in The Huntsville Times from December 31, 2012 to January 2, 2013

domain: news


text:
By the end of 2015, an estimated 1,008,616 people had reached Europe by sea. More than 84% of them were from refugee-producing countries including Syria (49%), Afghanistan (21%) and Iraq (9%). An estimated 17% were women and 25% were children under the age of 18 [1
]. In spite of much research on the nature of flows [2
] (and possible incentives to curb irregular migration), there has been little academic work published on conditions in migrant reception centres and even less recorded on the subject of well-being.
International relief and monitoring agencies [8
] have been particularly critical of informal camps where infectious disease and overcrowding present major health risks of epidemic proportions [9
]. However, we know much less about attempts to mitigate health risks inside formal reception centres. Given the extensive coverage of the Mediterranean migration “crisis” and the considerable investment made by donor states to the UNHCR, its partners and the governments of principal receiving states, this omission raises several important questions, not least why have scholars neglected this area of investigation? This question takes on added relevance when we consider that not only is there a significant body of related literature but donor policies, especially in the UK, prioritise vulnerable groups, which are taken to include women and children.
Previous research has found that forcibly displaced people face multiple emotional, psychological and medical hardships, as well as nutritional deficiencies [12
]. Clinical studies of refugees in general reveal that many suffer serious mental health problems as a result of forced displacement, such as depression, schizophrenia, post-traumatic stress disorder, psychosis and suicidal tendencies (see Beiser et al. [12
]). Evidence from past displacement contexts suggests that flaws in the reception system, above all overcrowding, may exacerbate health concerns. As Porter and Haslam record [19
], institutional accommodation in post-displacement situations tends to have a strong and negative impact on health outcomes. Further, Porobić has found that, while displacement generates threats to the well-being of refugees, social interventions and collective responses may in fact mitigate the experience of trauma and promote better health [20
]. Evaluations of health conditions inside reception centres may therefore inform the delivery of humanitarian assistance and ease integration in the host state.
The increased presence of women and children in Mediterranean flows further makes the case for a deeper investigation into the operation of the reception system and its bearing on health outcomes. Previous studies have indicated lower levels of mental health among female refugees which has been attributed to a host of social factors including low socioeconomic status, un- and underemployment, marginalization, discrimination, language barriers, cultural differences, social stigma, and lack of knowledge regarding available mental health services (See Donnelly [19
]). Female refugees are frequently identified in humanitarian reporting as being particularly vulnerable to physical and mental health difficulties and having unique health care needs (see UNHCR [16
]). Hence, the importance of gender for evaluating healthcare provision and allocating resources appropriately.
Moreover, although the mass influx of refugees to Europe in 2015 and 2016 has been described as a “crisis”, there are several important antecedents. For more than a decade, Europe has received boat migrants crossing the Mediterranean. Such flows have informed a small body of relevant scholarship. For example, Padovese et al. (2013) examined the arrival of boat migrants from the Horn of Africa who reached Malta between 2010 and 2011 only to be housed in open centres across the island [22
]. However, to date, few have considered their study of the health determinants of some 2216 migrants, housed in 10 open centres on a European Union state in the Mediterranean [23
]. Padovese’s study explores the prevalence of infectious disease including tuberculosis and also considers the impact of reception conditions on anti-social and addictive behaviours including use of drugs, alcohol and risky sexual practices. They also record diagnoses of skin diseases (21.9%), respiratory (19.8%), and gastro-enteric diseases (14.2%) among a migrant population which bears many similarities to those crossing today. The authors’ conclusion that the social determinants of migrants’ health in Malta are related to poor living conditions, language and cultural differences, physical and social environment, gender as well as the lack of integration policies and their explicit linkage between non-specific physical symptoms, psychosocial stress and mental disorders, is especially relevant to Europe’s latest refugee inflow (p. 373).
This article seeks to address the above gaps. It examines the effects of migration and reception on health outcomes among asylum-seekers and migrants who reached Italy and mainland Greece between January 2015 and October 2016 during the height of the migration “crisis”. Drawing upon research findings from a UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) funded project [24
], it examines the physical and mental health of asylum-seekers in transit and analyses how the closure of borders has engendered health risks for populations in recognised reception centres in Sicily and in Greece. Using mixed methods including a survey and interviews, this study sought to address two principal questions: (1) What is the nature of health provision in formal reception centres in Italy and Greece? (2) What is the impact of the reception system on the well-being of asylum-seekers?
The conceptual framework is informed by Gushulak and MacPherson’s population health-based approach, defined as one that “considers the relationship between migration and health as a progressive, interactive process influenced by temporal and local variables” [25
] (p. 1743). The focus then is on the experiences of migrants and asylum-seekers both in transit and in situ in reception centres. Although the idea of reception has been interpreted in European human rights case law which considers that one enters the reception system from point of submitting an asylum application, and one exits the system once a decision has been made, this definition is far from consistent. We therefore take a pragmatic view and suggest that reception begins not from the point that a claim for asylum is made, but from the point of an individual in need of protection being admitted to the protection system.
Another key concept is the notion of vulnerability. While the European Union’s Reception Conditions Directive has come to specify which groups are in need of addition protection, we note that neither asylum seekers nor refugees in general are treated as “vulnerable persons” [26
]. Rather only certain sub-categories have been singled out as eligible for special protection. In this context, vulnerable persons are listed as minors, unaccompanied minors, pregnant women, single parents of minors, and victims of torture, rape or other forms of physical, psychological and sexual violence. Subsequently vulnerable status was extended to victims of human trafficking and FGM. Vulnerable groups are similarly defined in the Greek legal framework, which has also specified persons suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), such as shipwreck survivors or relatives of victims, and victims of trafficking. For the purposes of this article, we treat vulnerability in terms of those who may be denied protection and are at great risk from both state and non-state forces.
The first part of this article sets out the research context and describes the geo-political developments which shaped the design of the reception systems of Italy and Greece. We then sketch the function and operations of the reception system in each country before turning to the empirical study. While mixed methods are a common approach to refugee-related research, given the urgent basis for funding this research and the shifting political agendas, we briefly explain the design and the choice of research instruments and their adaptation for the purposes of this study. The results presented are based on a survey of 700 asylum-seekers in Sicily and mainland Greece carried out between March 2016 and November 2016; and further semi-structured interviews with 45 migrants and 50 key informants including civil society groups, activists, and officials from international relief agencies, NGOs, and the governments of Sicily and Greece. This is followed by a discussion of the results and reconsideration of the nature of health services provided to those in the reception system between 2015 and 2016.
2. Research Context
2.1. Migration Trends: Flows, Blockages and Arrivals
Between 2015 and the end of 2016, Europe received over 1 million non-EU migrants—nationals originally from Africa, Asia and the Middle East who reached Europe by boat. While the majority of arrivals transited through Greece and Central Europe before making their way to host states, above all Germany, by early 2016 large numbers of migrants were blocked en route. The source of the blockage was two-fold: first, the imposition of national border controls in several EU states bordering the countries of first arrival which prevent migrants from continuing westward; and, second, an arrangement between the EU and Turkey sealed off access to Greece from the Aegean and thus reinforced the external border of the European Union. The effect of internal and external bordering drastically reduced numbers entering Greece but it has not stopped large numbers attempting to cross the central Mediterranean. Of the 71,933 sea arrivals from 1 January to 2 June 2017, there were 7369 in Greece compared to 61,165 in Italy.
The decision by Hungary to build a fence along its borders with Serbia and Croatia in June 2015 was followed by further attempts at border management, often through coercive means. Shortly before the fieldwork began, Austria, Germany, France, Sweden, Denmark and non-EU member Norway introduced passport controls. This was followed by the erection of fences along Bulgaria’s border with Turkey, as well as between Slovenia’s border with Croatia, and then in March 2016, along the Greek-Macedonian border by Eidomeni. By the time the field teams were deployed then there was little movement from Greece to the rest of Europe.
The inflow of migrants into Greece was also curtailed. In March 2016, the European Union and Turkey reached an arrangement (described as the “EU–Turkey deal”), which included several elements: (1) a readmission agreement with Turkey; (2) an agreement to relocate a select number of asylum seekers across the EU; and (3) an agreement to resettle a further 22,000 people from outside the EU to the EU Member States. As a result of the border closures and the EU–Turkey deal, tens of thousands of migrants became contained in frontline states, including the more than 15,000 on Greek island “hot-spots” which functioned as processing and detention centres. In May 2016, Human Rights Watch issued a report following its visits to hotspots on Samos, Lesbos, and Chios which recorded that not only had the police failed to stop incidents of violence against women and children but that facilities in all three centres were overcrowded, with significant shortages of basic shelter and filthy, unhygienic conditions [27
]. For others who had successfully moved from the islands to mainland Greece, they faced an equally precarious fate. Thousands were left in limbo, unable to move along the Western Balkan corridor from Serbia where the situation was no less bleak.
During the research period (March–October 2016), the UNHCR estimated that there were, at its peak, 62,000 migrants on the Greek mainland, though NGOs estimated there may have been as many as 80,000 [31
]. Unlike Greece, however, which was cut off as a result of the closure of the border with Macedonia and as a result of the EU–Turkey deal (implemented March 2016), migrants continued to cross the Central Mediterranean.
above records migration trends during the research period and notes the spike either side of the EU–Turkey deal.
Migrants seeking to cross the Central Mediterranean are intercepted by naval patrols or private search and rescue missions off the coast of Libya, and usually taken to closed hot-spots (Lampedusa, Pozzallo, and Trapani) or other ports in Sicily and occasionally other locations in Calabria. Once migrants are disembarked in Italy, they can begin the process of seeking asylum, although it should be noted that, during the journey, migrants are effectively profiled by age and nationality. Their health is also assessed while on board the ship.
Although secondary movement is not uncommon, data on numbers intercepted and asylum applications provide a rubric to identify those who may have benefitted from the reception system. In Greece, the number of asylum applications in 2016 was 51,092, three times as high as in 2015 (to 13,195). In Italy, an estimated 123,370 individuals applied for asylum in 2016, while a further 99,920 were pending by the end of the year. The UNHCR records that in 2016 there were 176,000 people in reception centres across Italy as of the end of the year.
2.2. The Reception System in Italy and in Greece
In Italy, the formal reception system is multi-layered and includes centres that provide first aid and assistance near sites of disembarkation (CPSA); collective centres set up under a specific Ministerial Decrees for asylum-seekers (CARA); and a second phase where individuals who have already filed an application for asylum are housed in reception centres managed by local authorities (SPRAR). In addition, the Italian government set up Extraordinary Reception Centres (Centri di accoglienza straordinaria) (CAS) to address the shortage of places in first and second reception centres. In practice, however, these extraordinary centres have become the main form of reception. There are an estimated 600 SPRARs hosting 23,000 people while the (CAS) number more than 3000 and host an estimated 137,000 people (February 2017). The reception system in Italy is especially complicated and whereas the Italian Red Cross (Croce Rossa Italiana) screens new arrivals, as migrants enter the reception system, they may come under the operational responsibility of a host of actors. The Italian system relies on sub-contracted service providers working on behalf of national and local authorities.
In Greece, migrants first enter the reception system on the islands, many of which have been designated as hotspots since the EU–Turkey deal. This includes the islands of Chios, Kos, Lesbos, Leros, and Samos. While most migrants are transferred to the mainland (7583 from 1 June 2016 to April 2017), others have found themselves trapped in overcrowded accommodation on the islands which have been the subject of much criticism [32
]. Refugee centres on the mainland, though formerly under governmental control, are operationally managed by a diverse range of actors including both humanitarian agencies (UNHCR, International Rescue Committee, Danish Refugee Council), and other state institutions. Formally, many centres were directed by the Greek army and national air force. Reception centres are spread across the country and their residents tend to be separated by nationality. Figure 2
shows the spread of reception centres during the peak of the crisis.
The management of refugees and migrants proved to be especially challenging in centres which were organised like traditional refugee camp like structures. The UNHCR grades reception conditions based on the following criteria and provisions.
Protection including: safe spaces for children; restoring family link services; legal counselling/information provision; mediation to prevent tensions with host community or between communities on site.
WASH including: the provision of toilets; separate toilet areas for women; showers, including showers with hot water and facilities separated for women; water taps on site; hygiene promoters; regular cleaning of wash facilities; garbage disposal waste management.
Food provision as ranked by: frequency of meals; types of food provided (hot, sandwiches, dry food); nutritional screening; separate facilities for breastfeeding.
Health provision as ranked by: distance to nearest health facility; the availability of psychosocial programmes and health referral service.
Communications including access to internet, charging plugs; two way communications system
Information—including information regarding: health services; relocation; asylum procedures; food distribution; shelter allocation; restoring family links; UNHCR services and local NGO services.
The UNHCR has also recorded marked differences between the above reception structures. Migrants have experienced a range of housing situations, with many complaining of overcrowding, lack of access to separate facilities for washing, in addition to limited access to lawyers and education. Some of the worst accommodation and ad hoc sites such as Elliniko, the old Athens airport, were closed in 2017. Instead, from summer 2016, asylum-seekers have increasingly been placed in shared accommodation, both state-controlled and private. UNHCR has also financed an urban accommodation scheme on the Greek mainland primarily for those waiting to be relocated and/or classified as vulnerable. Since its inception, 27,742 individuals have benefited from the scheme with 17,081 being housed in April 2017 [See UNHCR (27)].
In June 2015, the research team conducted a preliminary visit to Sicily (Catania, Caltanissetta, Lampedusa, Palermo, and Pozzallo) to observe the state of the search and rescue effort and to gain more knowledge about the reception system in Italy. At the time the EVI-MED project was conceived [32
], the nature of flows across the Mediterranean was shifting dramatically and there was a marked rise in spontaneous arrivals across the Eastern Mediterranean. The project team therefore decided to include Greece in its proposed study but to limit their investigation to the mainland, not the islands where much research activity was already taking place.
The research team proposed using mixed methods to explore the impact of reception on health service provision and health outcomes. After an inception period in autumn 2015, training workshops were held in Athens, Thessaloniki and Palermo. All researchers were informed of the requirements outlined in the ESRC Framework for Research Ethics which details procedures for respecting anonymity, confidentiality, consent, and handling data. Consent forms were drafted and translated into several languages. Researchers were alerted to the possibility that it might not be possible to obtain written consent, in which case they would seek verbal consent. All accepted that no pressure should be placed on individuals to participate and that participants could withdraw at any point. It was also agreed that any visual material used or produced would ensure that subjects could not be identified without their consent.
During the first stages of the project the researchers relied on UNHCR’s data and other official sources including Eurostat as well as statistics produced by the national statistical offices of Greece and Italy. Data provided by Frontex, the EU’s border management agency, though useful, came with additional complications. One problem was that their data refer to the previous three-month period and record each and every breach/interception/border crossing. The research team was therefore aware that Frontex’s data carried the risk of over counting arrivals and therefore did not rely on this dataset to estimate arrivals when preparing the sample frame. Many NGOs also produced helpful datasets, above all, MSF. UNHCR’s documentation also became more detailed and while there were some small differences between the data produced by the UNHCR and IOM, these narrowed considerably during the project. However, these data sources also included limitations including the lack of gender disaggregated data, especially in the context of minors.
To address these concerns, an original survey was designed and administered as a face to face questionnaire. At the time the project was conceived (May 2015), more migrants were reaching the Central Mediterranean than crossing the Aegean. The research team had promised the funding body that it would conduct 300 surveys in Greece and 400 in Sicily, though this breakdown did not represent the volume of flows as the project progressed and significantly more arrived via Greece. Despite this change, we recognised that the increase in arrivals to Greece was dominated by Syrians and that the team could still gather a useful picture of inflows by limiting the number of surveys to 300 and by oversampling to include non-Syrian populations.
The sample population included third country nationals who had been unable to move on or were currently in the process of seeking asylum, having received subsidiary protection or were without status. To provide a more representative study, a sampling frame was constructed based on the most recent UNHCR’s data on the nationality of migrants who had arrived. The survey was translated into local languages while field locations were identified by local partners—the Greek Council for Refugees in Greece and Borderline Sicily. In Greece, the research took place in Athens (Elliniko, Eleonas, and Piraeus) and Thessaloniki regions (Diavata and Eidomeni). In Sicily, research was conducted in Aidone-Enna, Bagheria, Caltanissetta, Catania, Cava d’Aliga/Scicli, Chiaramonte Gulfi, Palermo, Piazza Armerina-Enna, Ragusa, Siracusa, and Vittoria.
The aim of the survey was to examine the functioning of formal reception centres and other types of accommodation provided to asylum-seekers in Greece and in Italy. Developing the population health based approach, the project also introduced a temporal dimension which recognised the dynamic nature of flows and provided a further basis for comparing trends in migration. While flows were especially changeable before the closure of borders in March 2016, even after this date, the stock of migrants fluctuated considerably. With this aim in mind the survey research was designed to be conducted over two periods during 2016. The rationale for dividing the research into two periods (wave 1: March–May 2016; wave 2: September–October 2017) was further justified on the grounds that it would provide a methodologically more sophisticated approach to understanding the way geopolitical pressures affected both the entry and exit of third country nationals.
They survey included a mix of multiple choice answers and some open/write-in answers. Survey questions sought to gather information on demographic characteristics, migrant well-being, health and disability; routes taken and last country of residence; the use of agents, smuggling and means of arrival; experiences of the reception process and assistance provided; and plans and expectations for the future. With respect to health specifically, the survey posed five questions. Participants were asked to identify themselves as having a serious health condition, if healthcare was a factor influencing their flight; whether they contracted any illnesses/diseases in transit; if they received health support; and if they received psychological support and/or counselling.
A short pilot study was conducted in December 2015 and full fieldwork began in March 2016. Field teams quickly found that certain populations were difficult to capture in the survey. For example, in Italy, where Eritreans were treated as a privileged group, we found that their experience upon arrival contrasted with other nationals that were processed in hot-spots, upon disembarkation. Most Eritreans were immediately transported from Sicily to centres in mainland Italy and therefore were not available to participate in the survey. We therefore asked the local teams if they could use their local knowledge to identify some Eritreans, recognising that this approach was far from random. We also included in the survey a mapping exercise. All participants were asked to mark their journeys on a map and were questioned regarding their route and transit countries.
In addition to the survey research, the research team conducted in-depth interviews with asylum-seekers (45) to gain more contextual knowledge about the functioning of the reception system. The research team oversampled some understudied foreign nationals in order to gather more information about how their experiences of reception and their prospects of asylum, relocation, resettlement, or eventual return compared to groups that had been prioritised for international protection (above all Syrians). In addition, the research team sought where possible to note gender discrepancies and through the in-depth interviews to explore the role of gender on the experience of reception.
Further interviews were conducted with key informants (50) including representatives of government offices, humanitarian and relief agencies, NGOs and activist organisations, in person and by phone, in Brussels, London and Rome. The stakeholder interviews offered the research team the opportunity to explore how reception operates in each country and feeds into the national asylum system and related policies. We were especially keen to learn about the operation of the EU’s relocation and resettlement programmes, and possibilities for family reunification further to Dublin Regulation. Interviews were conducted with agencies including Frontex, the UNHCR and IOM and their partner NGOs and civil society organisations. We also interviewed government agencies responsible for search and rescue, immigration and asylum, as well as relocation officers from participating EU Member States.
Upon completion of the fieldwork, survey data were entered into a shared online system (QUALTRICS) and were cleaned to remove errors and address missing variables. This produced a dataset of 700 individuals which was analysed using SPSS (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) to identify frequencies and to explore the impact of age, nationality, gender and health, among other variables, on the migrant experience before (i.e., in transit) and during the reception process. Interview data were transcribed and coded to explore key themes, as discussed below.
The section below presents the results from the survey in response to specific questions. The results are organised to inform the nature and national composition of the survey participants, their reasons for leaving and experiences in transit. Responses to the survey on key points are further illustrated with evidence gathered in interview. The issue of health was most relevant in the context of the reception centre setting, though it did also come up in both interviews and in response to specific survey questions and in interview regarding the quality of healthcare provided inside the reception centres.
4.1. General Observations
The survey results provided much information on the composition of groups in both countries. In the case of Italy, migrants were principally from West Africa and Eritrea. In the case of Greece, they included nationals from refugee producing states, above all Syria, Afghanistan, Iran, and Iraq; in addition to Pakistan. Flows to Greece were also less diverse. The top four nationalities in Greece comprise 91% of arrivals in 2016 while in Italy the top seven nationalities comprised 65%.
above records participants in Italy and Greece, respectively and their countries of origin.
One defining characteristic of flows is the spread of nationalities, with Afghans, Iraqis, Iranians and Syrians almost exclusively present in Greece and absent from Sicily. Nationals from Nigeria, Gambia, Mali and Eritrea are heavily present in Sicily and are conversely absent from Greece. The project team also noted the increase in Eritreans and Guineans further to increasing levels of instability of those countries while the number of Nigerians and Syrians also rose. Only Pakistanis are present in large numbers in both Greece and Sicily. However, it is important to point out that the presence of Pakistanis was far from standard. The mapping exercise produced information which suggested that some Pakistanis present in Sicily has not arrived by boat crossing the Central Mediterranean but that they had taken the Aegean route and then travelled down through the Balkans to Italy and eventually to Sicily. Their presence therefore challenges prevailing accounts of Mediterranean migration which emphasises flows along one of two routes.
There were important socio-demographic differences between arrivals in Italy and in Greece as represented in Figure 3
In Sicily, the presence of predominantly single young men between the ages of 18–30 accounts for the majority of arrivals. In Greece, by contrast, both men and women are present in more equal numbers (64% male to 46% female), and the age range is greater. The results show that it was not just that there are more women in Greece, but that they brought with them their children and were likely to travel with family members. The largest presence of migrants by nationality and gender is in Greece where almost 70% of Afghans were male, in contrast to 30.2% females. Syrians by gender appear almost in equal numbers (51% male; 49% female). In Sicily, while overall the population concerned is largely male, there is a sizeable percentage of Nigerian females (almost 40%). In both waves, only three per cent of participants described themselves as pregnant though in each wave a number of women had given birth recently.
There was also a marked shift in the recognition rates for asylum-seekers during the research period. In 2015, an estimated 97.2% of Syrians and 89.8% of Eritreans received asylum. As indicated in Figure 4
below, some countries also prioritised particular nationalities for asylum; for example, Italy recognised a greater percentage of Eritrean claims than other Member States.
As recorded in Table 2
, recognition rates changed as Member States became increasingly more selective with the introduction of both European policies and tighter restrictions on entry.
4.2. Inside the Reception System
The reception systems of the two countries were noticeably different. Living conditions in Italy were relatively better than in in Greece where participants lived in a range of institutions, from insecure camp-like settings to shared accommodation in modern apartment blocks. The research team witnessed some truly shocking living conditions in Elliniko (Athens) where Afghans were housed in the disused airport, football/baseball and hockey stadiums and lived inside tents or makeshift partitioned spaces. While Elliniko was condemned, for some participants, this setting was an improvement. One Afghan participant said she had previously been forced to live in one of 70 tents outside the formal centre because she did not have a “special stamp”. As a result, she and the other tent dwellers were initially denied food and access to the centres in Elliniko. Being moved into the centre, however, brought other challenges. Accounts of violent crime and fears of gender-related violence were also reported. In other parts of mainland Greece, refugees were housed in better conditions; while many had lived in tents, eventually air-conditioning units were installed. During the research period, residents were gradually moved into apartments and shared living spaces with support from NGOs.
In Italy, we found that, in spite of different bases in law, in many cases, there was no difference between certain types of reception centre; for example, the differences between SPRAR and CAS were not always evident. Most of those interviewed had experienced living in multiple types of accommodation until they were settled and could apply for asylum. In Sicily, some participants described how they had been moved from small villages to towns and in some cases cities like Catania where they lived in multiple occupancy rooms which were “good enough”. Many others described how they had been sent to remote villages with very little possibility to do any activity which would advance their integration. For them, there was limited opportunity for language lessons or training. The few unaccompanied minors we observed reported to our NGO partners that they generally fared better and spoke about how they received language instruction in Italian. In addition to activities including sport, they received and phone cards.
4.3. Examining Involuntary Flight
The survey data record that the overwhelming majority of participants were in fact forced migrants fleeing persecution, war, famine, and personal insecurity. This information was further recorded in the interviews where participants often went into great detail to describe their life beforehand and their reasons for fleeing. Most participants gave multiple reasons for leaving and seeking to enter Europe. One Syrian interviewed in Greece put it simply—”I used to live with my wife in Idlib. We had a normal life there until the outbreak of war. Our house was bombed and we lost everything. After that we hadn’t any option but to leave our country” (Syrian man, aged 47). In addition to refugees fleeing Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan, several spoke about how conflicts in Cote d’Ivoire, Mali, Sierra Leone drove them out in search of security. Some participants interviewed in Greece spoke about how they fled Islamic militants including the Taliban in Afghanistan and Daesh/IS in Iraq. Often, insecurity was magnified by other pressures, including inter-ethnic tension and gender-based discrimination and violence. As one Afghan woman from small village reported:
“In June 2015 my father was pressed by the Taliban to offer me or my sister to them. He asked them for a couple of days in order to be prepared and decide which of us had to go. In the meantime I went with my sister to my uncle’s family in Kabul. When the Taliban returned and did not find us, my father was killed. Immediately after this incident my mother joined us and after a few days we left the country to save our lives. We couldn’t think to stay in Afghanistan because now we are a family without a male, which means that we have no protector. We cannot work, we cannot go out alone, we cannot survive without a male”.
(Afghan woman in Greece, aged 26)
As indicated in Table 3
below, fear and insecurity drove our participants to Europe in large measure, only 18% described their motivation as economic and an even smaller number said they came for personal or post-materialist reasons like travel or study. This finding affirms other research which claims that most of those who reached Europe during the research period were drawn by “push” rather than “pull” factors and represent a predominantly asylum-seeking population.
How and why people reached Italy and Greece is a more complicated story and many of those surveyed reported they had no control over their eventual destination. This was especially the case for those who took the Central Mediterranean route and had journeyed via Libya. In particular, we found that several West Africans had hoped to work in Libya which was relatively stable at the time when they began their journey but that then changed. As one Senegalese migrant reported in interview,
“Well I am here (Sicily) but it was not my option to come here. My initial choice was to go to Libya…I found myself stuck in Libya, I could not go home. I can guarantee you that amongst us, whether it be a refugee or an economic migrant, 95% of us are stick against our own will. Once you arrived in Libya it’s better for you to cross the Mediterranean Sea than to turn your back to save your life. He explained that often people were obliged by forced to leave at the risk of death”.
(Senegalese male aged 18)
Some participants were simply caught up in the “crisis” as a result of personal accident. For example, one female from Morocco who married a Syrian in Turkey in 2016 arrived in Greece with her husband where she gave birth. While he was entitled to be relocated and travelled on to France, she was left behind in Greece because of her nationality. Those who reached the Greek islands and were eventually moved onto the mainland considered it to be a transit point. Almost 63% of respondents of our respondents recorded that they never intended to remain in Greece but had hoped to move on.
4.4. Traumatic Experiences: Torture and Exploitation in Transit
The survey results also record shocking instances of abuse, especially for those who had travelled across the Sahara via Libya before boarding vessels for Sicily. Participants who transited through Sicily (52%) reported that they experienced mistreatment during their journey both overland and at sea (in contrast to 16.4% in Greece). One Guinean recalled how Libyan rebels tore up his documentation and threw him in jail for two weeks. As he admitted, “I had no clue that in Libya people were being imprisoned, brutalised, killed and tortured. For example, people who tried to escape from prison were shot dead right away in the most inhumane ways. They were slaughtered. I witnessed people being beaten up to death”.
Accounts of kidnapping, physical and psychological abuse and imprisonment were not uncommon. A man from Cote d’Ivoire who was interviewed in Italy reported that he had spent one year and nine months in a Libyan prison. One West African migrant even recounted how he was stabbed by a policeman in Libya. Explaining to the team interviewers how he received a noticeable scar, he provided the following account:
“I had in while I was in prison; it was a policeman that stabbed me there. He asked me…that was a Thursday morning, on a Thursday morning, there was a 6 square metre room, we were 138 in this room, 138 in a 6 square metre room, 6 square metre I am telling you, we were 138 confined in this room…what we did… there were hours where you would need to go toilets especially around midday, if you needed to go toilet, you would need to wait up to 7 PM or even the next morning”.
(Senegalese man aged 18)
Others were detained upon arrival in Libya. This was most pronounced among migrants from the Horn of Africa who reported arrest or detention in transit. While 31.7% of participants in Sicily had been engaged in paid work as they made the journey across Africa, some 17% of others explained that they were coerced to pay smugglers and to finance their onward travel. The same applied to participants who travelled via Turkey, though in smaller numbers. As one Moroccan graduate in English literature who had left her country in search of a better life, explained:
“We arrived in Turkey in January 2016. In Turkey I had the chance to work for about 2 months as a street seller. The amount of 6000 euros my father had to pay the smugglers, was not enough for me to continue the trip to Europe. So, I had no way but work for a while and find the way to leave”.
(Moroccan woman, aged 26)
, drawn from the survey results, records that many more migrants principally from Africa worked in-kind, often under exploitative conditions, to pay for their journey across the Mediterranean. The prevalence of smuggling and in some reported cases trafficking along the Central Mediterranean route in Libya and elsewhere in Sub-Saharan Africa is further evidenced in the interviews.
4.5. Health Issues as a Motivating Factor and in Transit
A small number of participants listed healthcare as one reason for moving on, though this was not a major factor in their decision to reach Europe. More importantly, participants recorded that their health was directly affected by their journey. Almost 40% of participants recorded that they contracted diseases and illness in transit. This was most evident for those who took the Central Mediterranean route who reported a number of ailments. As illustrated in Table 5
below, the most prominent illness was scabies followed by dehydration, diarrhoea, physical injuries, tuberculosis, and pneumonia.
Many participants wrote in additional medical complaints which tended to be associated with the journey as well as living in camp-like settings. Illnesses reported by our respondents included respiratory issues, cold and flu, dermatological issues and either minor illnesses, often due to the difficult conditions of travel, but also some severe health issues such as leukaemia, hepatitis or Alzheimer’s disease, as well as various degrees of psychological distress.
4.6. Torture, Abuse and Mental Health
The interviews recorded several cases of psychological distress due to torture or severe mistreatment. Some reported that they suffered from mental health problems at various stages of their journey; though more precise information was provided in interview which clarified which events and circumstances most affected their well-being. Many of those who had experienced torture or the direct effects of war and violence, recorded that their mental health was negatively affected. Equally, several identified detention on the Greek islands as negatively affecting them. Such factors were not however limited to those on the islands but were even noted in more open centres on the Greek mainland. As one MSF psychologist explained:
“Prolonged stress causes some symptoms, usually psychosomatic. People come with this kind of problems… I have a headache, I can’t sleep, I don’t have an appetite et cetera. It is a problem of adaption. It is obvious why. Who could adapt to these conditions I mean? And stress about what is going to happen, about my children, are they going to get in? That is why they left Iran. They were second class citizens in Iran, their children couldn’t go to school, they couldn’t get decent jobs so they left to find a better future. And now they are in a halt and what is going to happen. So not being able to sleep due to ruminative thinking about what is going to happen et cetera. This is very common. And then there were people who already had a predisposition to not being mentally healthy which the situation worsened”.
(MSF Ellinko 7 July 2016)
In Italy, we also identified profound mental health challenges among asylum-seekers, though most were not linked directly to the process of reception. Rather, we suggest psychological trauma was inflicted in transit. This finding was supported by a parallel study conducted by MSF during the research period. MSF screened 385 individuals in Ragusa province and found that 193 (50%) presented mental health problems above all, PTSD (31%), and depression (20%). They suggested that, among the many sources of trauma, patients who had been in combat situations at risk of death or had witnessed violence or death and had been in detention were most likely to present symptoms of trauma [33
]. These findings are indicative of the pervasive human rights abuses that confront migrants, especially as they seek to transit via Libya.
4.7. Access to Healthcare and Health Risks within the Centres
In Italy, in many cases, refugees and migrants were housed in institutions where medical staff were not routinely present. Participants did however have access to doctors in the local town and would be escorted by a SPRAR staff member in order to attend appointments. Their situation was considerably better than what was on offer in Greece where, despite a new law which opened up access to the public health system to vulnerable people including beneficiaries of international protection, asylum seekers and their families (Law 4368/2016 of 20 February 2016) [34
], we found much irregularity.
Just over half of participants in Greece received access to health services (57% in contrast to 43% who had no access). Once inside the reception centres participants were forced to rely on an overstretched system [32
]. The way in which medical complaints were addressed depended largely on geography and the resources available within the centres. Though most reception centres in Greece had a medical referral system on call seven days a week, UNHCR recorded significant disparities between the types of services afforded to refugees, again in part due to the location of centres.
In Greece, the government appointed centre manager who was responsible for keeping registries of residents had considerable influence over the allocation of medical and health resources. The manager was often a representative of another organisation, such as the UNHCR, and while they coordinated with the government on a day to day basis, NGOs often initiated additional medical interventions. Medical provision was therefore uneven and access uncertain. The issue was more pronounced in large facilities where it was not simply access to medical assistance and supplies but basic hygiene was challenged by overcrowding. As one MSF worker based in Elliniko explained, one major challenge was keeping new-born babies clean and preventing infectious and diarrheal disease. However, she added, that many of the predominantly Afghan mothers were highly experienced and they “somehow managed” despite the deplorable conditions (MSF Elliniko, 7 July 2016).
4.8. Access to Psychosocial Services
Psychosocial support was especially limited. In Greece just over one quarter of participants surveyed (26%) reported that they had access to psychological services. In Italy, there were also significant discrepancies between the type of services provided. While 74% enjoyed access to health services in Italy, only 35% has access to psychological services. These shortcomings were reflected in responses to the survey with most participants unaware of health and psychological services nominally provided in centres.
“(Participant)—Yes, there is a psychologist here in this centre but I was never introduced to him
(Interviewer) Could you remind me again since you arrived? You said 9 months right? And you still have not been introduced to him?
(Participant)—It is now 1 year and 4 months since I arrived in this refugee centre…but if there is a psychologist here, personally, I do not know him, they never, never introduced me to a psychologist here. The only persons that I know here are these two persons Francesca Pina and the manageress, only them, only these two persons that I know here”.
(Sengalese man, Italy 2016)
Another Gambian man similarly responded that he did not know if there was a doctor on site—”No I don’t know, they told me about the doctor but I don’t know”, (Gambia, Male, 20 Italy). Such uncertainty was reflected across the research sample, as recorded in Table 6
and Table 7
It should be noted that such variation in service provision between reception centres was evident from the point when the reception system was first introduced, as indicated in Table 8
4.9. Gender, Medical and Psychosocial Provision
The relationship between gender and health provision was raised in questions posed to recent mothers and to women who identified as pregnant. In response to the questions “would you describe yourself as being pregnant?” and “do you receive health support?”, all but one participant responded positively. With respect to counselling, however, the participants who were pregnant responded overwhelmingly that they did not have access to psychosocial assistance. In fact, only one out of 14 pregnant respondents recorded that she was receiving counselling and psychological support. Counselling as a service was generally absent and only those who attended clinics outside the camp appeared to have any access to psychosocial support.
4.10. NGOs Filling the Gap
Key organisations such as Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), the Hellenic Red Cross, Women and health Alliance (WAHA), and Médecins du Monde worked to fill the gap. These organisations could be found in reception centres both on the Greek islands and mainland, often working in parallel with other relief providers such as the Danish Refugee Council. MSF in particular had a considerable presence in the centres having 700 staff dedicated to Greece on top of its 27-person national office. For MSF, Greece was its second largest mission after Congo (MSF Interview 4 July 2016). In 2016, MSF medical teams in Greece carried out 72,740 health consultations, including: 8207 mental health consultations, 3195 sexual and reproductive health consultations, 61,338 medical consultations, covering primary healthcare, physiotherapy, treatment for chronic diseases and more [33
]. We found in the Ellinko “Arrivals” on the site of the former airport, MSF had set up two mobile units: one van providing midwife led sexual and reproductive health services, and the other van consisted of three psychologists who provided mental health and psychological services. Following a health promotion campaign, MSF could vaccinate children as young as three weeks up to 15 years of age in the three camps over the course of three days.
However, despite their commitment to Greece, the presence of medical provision by NGOs is far from universal and access to healthcare varies significantly.
The above study was conducted during a period when the agenda of the European Union was changing rapidly. The closure of borders among EU member states and the implementation of the EU–Turkey deal created many operational challenges including the relocation of migrants from the Greek islands to centres on the mainland. While the population appeared to stabilise, in practice we noted that during the research there was increased pressure to move people out of centres and into shared urban dwellings. Similarly, in Sicily, migrants were dispersed across the island. Since asylum-seekers and migrants of the same nationality tended to be housed together, it is possible that, in addition to Eritreans, some nationals of small groups were not identified for inclusion in the research project.
The administration of the survey in waves had many advantages, however we note that the pressure of time and limitations of funding meant that we could only divide the project into two waves. The fact that migrants have continued to cross the Central Mediterranean and that new flows are arriving from Morocco and Egypt affirms the highly dynamic nature of migration and the relevance of comparative research of this nature.
Health was one of several themes explored in the survey and was limited to just five key questions. Although further interviews were conducted to gather more information on this theme, the number was limited on account of time. Further in depth interviews would strengthen the evidence base and also draw out more information about the long term impact of being housed in reception centres.
Despite the above limitations, the above findings present an important record of the functioning of the receptions systems and the provision of health services to asylum-seekers and migrants. In the first place, we note marked variation between the flows of the two main receiving states, Greece and Italy. We identify two distinct sub-systems characterised by significant differences in terms of the national and demographic composition of migrant groups, gender, age, and many social characteristics. The differentiation occurred during a period of marked geopolitical developments which aimed to curb both inflows and outflows of migrants and refugees.
We record that approaches to reception differ across the two states and that these differences may be partially explained by the countries’ experience of asylum management. For example, in contrast to Greece, Italy which has long been a receiving and destination state has had legislation in place for over a decade that provides for the creation of the reception institutions where asylum seekers are housed. However, in practice, there is no uniform reception system in Italy and migrants may be placed in a number of institutions. More telling is the impact shift in gender. In Greece, over summer 2015, the percentage of women and accompanying children began to increase which is reflected in the difference between the two sets of participants (“stock”), where the presence of men in Sicily greatly outnumbers women, the situation in Greece is remarkably dissimilar and reflects a pattern of family migration recorded elsewhere in the surveys.
Although healthcare was one minor reason for moving on, health issues feature at all stages of the journey and throughout migrants’ experience of the reception system. This finding affirms the relevance of Gushulak and MacPherson’s population health-based approach. In this setting, local variables include the widespread abuse of human rights in countries of origin such as Syria, but also in Libya and in Greece where policies of detention have caused significant distress. In terms of physical ailments, participants who had transited via Libya recorded multiple illnesses which is in part informed by the longer and more dangerous journey across the desert. However, in both Italy and Greece, participants recorded that their health was directly affected by their journey. The above findings in Italy also align closely with the earlier study of health determinants in Maltese reception system by Padovese et al. (see [23
]), which found several of the same ailments recorded along the Central Mediterranean route. While the physical diagnoses were dominated by skin diseases such as scabies, the above account clearly provides evidence that the journey to Europe had a negative impact on participants’ health and affirm previous findings note the effects of forced migration and the inter-related sources of morbidity, stress and trauma.
The most enduring problems recorded were psychological and mental health issues, with high incidences of depression. The causes include traumatic experiences pre-flight for example torture both in country of origin and in transit. Further, the devastating effects of losing family and being separated from family and local surroundings exacerbated their trauma. Such conditions appeared to worsen with longer periods spent in the reception process.
The effects of gender on health and access to services requires further consideration, as does the concept of vulnerability. Although female participants presented symptoms of stress and depression associated with their flight from Syria, so did male participants. In Italy, where there was a much larger presence of single males, we also note the effects of torture and bonded labour experienced in Libya. The lack of psychological services was largely universal, though within the centres, women were more vulnerable as a result of gender-related violence, sexual assault and general insecurity and thus may most benefit from counselling and psychological services. In addition, we note that maternal health was compromised by the sub-standard centres in Greece. Afghan mothers who were housed in the worst centres were particularly disadvantaged by the availability of health care. In this setting, we note the limitations of the category of “vulnerability” used by the European Union institutions. In theory, vulnerability criteria establish which individuals may be prioritised for assistance; in practice, access to healthcare is uneven and determined by contextual factors.
The wide variation in terms of health and psychological services offered to those inside the reception system is recorded in both the UNHCR’s reports and in the quantitative studies which show that in both Greece and in Italy, there was a significant lack of access to psychological support and uneven access to medical services. Even though doctors were present in the centres, respondents reported having limited access. The fact that participants may have been unaware of medical services provided by NGOs and contracted agencies working within the reception systems points not only to broader issues of resource management but also the need to raise awareness. One possible point of reform lies in the role of the centre administrator who plays a pivotal role in the allocation of resources including initiating and engaging medical interventions. Moreover, we note that, in Greece, there was a tendency for centres to be run in a top-down manner and those housed in centres therefore relied on a chain of relief workers to provide critical information.
The interviews included above further record that participants were unaware of available services, were often unable to access necessary services, and were simply provided with essential services inside the reception centres. Although the level of service differs markedly between Italy and Greece—Italy providing more services overall—the dearth of psychological and mental health services indicates a major lacunae in the management of reception systems in both states.
Although health features prominently in refugee studies, in the context of Europe’s “refugee crisis”, there has been little attention given to the ways in which health issues have been managed or in the case of psychological services neglected in the context of refugee reception. Given the massive investment by the donor community—the European Commission having allocated €371.16 million to the Greek authorities and international organisations operating in Greece—the uneven provision of medical assistance and especially the dearth of psychosocial support is most alarming [34
]. This is particularly notable given that during the research project the number of asylum-seekers in Greece was estimated to be just 50,000. By contrast, flows of migrants to Italy increased substantially. As the above discussion records, the use of overcrowded centres in both countries and especially closed sites like the hot-spots on the Greek islands may increase vulnerabilities and exacerbate mental and psychological stress, thus indicating an important area for reform.
Demographic differences clearly impact on the health needs of refugees in the two countries. Further, the range and quality of provision in Italy is noticeably better in Greece which suggests that, past experience, including the introduction of specific legislation and the development of an asylum infrastructure, may be responsible for this comparative improvement. In the future, Greece too may benefit from its experience as a refugee hosting state, provided that institutional memory is protected and lessons learned.
The fact that medical provision varies from one centre in Greece to another further begs the question, to what extent is this variation due to the quality of centre management and calls for further investigation of the role played by centre managers. There is clearly a greater need to ensure that information cascades down more effectively. The criteria used by the UNHCR to grade health services in reception centres does not address the substantive issue that, even where services are provided, asylum-seekers are not accessing services available. This suggests there is a great need for more information campaigns and further induction sessions to direct refugees to essential services.
By drawing upon research conducted both inside reception centres and with key stakeholders and across two systems in Italy and in Greece where the largest numbers of refugee arrivals have been contained, this article demonstrates that health provision is not as recorded in official UNHCR reporting. Rather, there are critical gaps between provision, awareness, and access to health and psychological services. Above all, we note that the process of reception in Italy and Greece, just as the protracted detention of asylum-seekers in other host states, does not alleviate mental health problems but rather is a contributing factor in the aggravation of illness and trauma among refugee and asylum-seeking populations.
In light of the above, we offer the following recommendations.
It is essential to make health provision more consistent across the two systems in Italy and Greece. In this context, the first priority must be to ensure a more regular and visible presence of medical staff in all types of reception centres.
There is an urgent need to mainstream psychosocial services across the reception systems of both countries.
Recognising that issues of language and interpretation make it difficult for migrants to interact with doctors and other medical staff, more attention should be placed on language training and cultural integration to enable the delivery of effective medical support.
Information is essential to the effective delivery of services. We therefore recommend that the UNHCR and its partners introduce more information campaigns inside reception centres with a view to directing asylum seekers to the health services they require.
The UNHCR and its partners should gather more analytical data, disaggregated by age and gender, in order to inform the delivery of services and allocation of critical resources.


text:
You just have to ask, yes, that's what I found out today :) Just ask for makeover and pay $0! Amazing! I found myself in Sephora store today and decided to ask, and minute later I was sitting in my "Diva chair". My make-up artist Abby was very pleasant and knowledgeable. I got smokey eye look, that looked super natural and "light". Very simple to duplicate, I even got a cheat sheet. I was surprised how much it made my eye color to pop. I was introduced with some products who's use was new to me. Overall I was and am very impressed and satisfied for service I received. Different and amazing experience. Definitely will go back for more and see their other offers. Today's experience was little step outside my routine and that always feels amazing :)
Products that were used to create this amazing and simple look were:
- Skincare: Fresh Lotus radiance cream, Fresh Lotus eye gel
- Face: YSL Touche Eclate #2
- Eye: Benefit Stay don't stray, Urban Decay Naked Basics 2 (stark, cover, primal, skimp, primal) Stila Stay all day liquid eyeliner, Lancome Grandiose mascara
Thank you Sephora and Abby for the great experience and service you provided for me today.


RUBBERCOMPANY,INC. Quality Industrial Rubber Goods Since 1921 Potomac Rubber Company • 9011 Hampton Overlook • Capitol Heights, MD 20743Tel: 301-336-7400 • Fax: 301-350-6543 • [email protected] • /p>
Indoor fire hose with a fire extinguisher A fire hose (or firehose) is a high-pressure hose that carries water or other fire retardant (such as foam) to a fire to extinguish it. Outdoors, it attaches either to a fire engine or a fire hydrant. Indoors, it can permanently attach to a building''s standpipe or pluing system. The usual working
Industrial Rubber Hose Industrial Rubber Hose MULTIPURPOSE Coil Lengths = 20mt, 40mt & 100mt. Code I.D.mm O.D.mm W.P Bar Weight kg/mt Availability RMD1-0019 5 12 20 0.16 Stocked RMD1-0025 6 13 20 0.17 Stocked RMD1-0031 8 15 20 0.20 Stocked
Nominal Size I.D. O.D Operating Pressure Bend Radius mm inch mm inch bar psi mm inch 1/2" 12.5 0.5 19.6 0.777 8 115 25 0.98 5/8" 16.5 0.625 22.5 0.866 8 115 32 1.26 3/4" 19.5 0.75 26 1 7 100 45 1.78 7/8" 22 0.875 30 1.181 6 87 55 2.16 1" 25.5 1 33.5 6
DREDGE SUCTION NOZZLES By: Dale Russell Suction nozzles can easily be home made , with some ingenuity & a few tools. No matter what size you want to make from 1" up to 6", you can purchase exhaust pipe with that outside diameter (OD) Power jets
Size tolerance: +/- 0.5mm working pressure 0.3-0.9Mpa Bursting Pressure: 2Mpa Working Temperature:-60 C to +260 C Thickness Range: 2mm-5mm Product Keywords Rubber Radiator Hose,Orange Rubber Gas Hose For Gas Stove
PVC Suctions Hoses are available in Cam Lock (Cam and Groove), NH / NST, Storz or NPSH. Fire department flexible suction hose is a specific type of fire hose used in drafting operations, when a fire engine uses a vacuum to draw water from a portable water tank, pool, or other static water source.
# Hose Size 50’ 75’ 100’ AM104 13/ 4” $161.95$338.95 $225.95 BH087 21/ 2” $209.95$375.95 $292.95 D NFPA 1961 Requires less storage space, allowing more room for hose or equipment C B A HOSE
Inside Diameter (Inch) 2-1/2 Outside Diameter (Decimal Inch) 2.9000 Overall Length (Feet) 10 Type Chemical Handling Hose Connection Type Cam and Groove Minimum Temperature (F) -40 Maximum Temperature (F) 250 Material Modified XLPE Fitting Size 2-1/2
25/11/2016· I’ve read somewhere that increasing the fittings and air hose size fr0m 3/8 to 1/2 will give your air tools more power/torque. My craftsman impact wrench says it has 700 lbs of torque… I don’t see it. I have 3/8 hose and fittings, would an increase in size make a
LPG HOSE ( Item Code : 100 L ) Meets or exceeds IS 9573, BS EN 1762, BS 4089, BS 3212, SI 764 S.no Size of Hose Inner Diameter Outer Diameter Maximum Working Pressure Minimum Burst Pressure Minimum Bend Radius mm Inch mm Inch Bar MPa
We have clear, wire reinforced PVC suction and delivery hose, from 3/4" to 4", available in stock now. Order hose online today for next day delivery. egories egories ABS ABS ABS Pipe Inch ABS Pipe Fittings Inch ABS Flanges Inch Backing Rings EPDM
Shop EZ-FLO 1-1/2-in Inner Diameter PVC Spa Flex Hose (By-the-Foot) in the Tubing & Hoses (By-the-Foot) department at Lowe''s. The EZ-FLO Flexible Spa hose is designed for use with swimming pools, jetted hot tubs, spas, water suction, and water transfer
Quality PVC Water Hose manufacturers & exporter - buy Flexible PVC Water Hose Reinforced Helix Suction And Discharge Hose / Pipe / Tube from China manufacturer. Construction: Flexible PVC, rigid PVC helix, synthetic braiding, smooth bore, corrugated O.D.
14/3/2020· Abbott Rubber PVC Pump Suction Hose, 2 in. ID x 20 ft., 1240-2000-20-RP is rated 4.4 out of 5 by 8. Rated 5 out of 5 by Klydej from Tough durable hose Tough durable hose so far, used it three times when it was cold, hopefully the hose will be more flexible during warmer weather.
Pump + Hose + Metering Auto Fuel Nozzle Voltage DC 12V/24V Power 175W Inlet/Outlet Dia BSPT/NPT 3/4''Inch Flow 0-50L/Min Suction/Lift 3m/7m Suction Hose 2m Delivery Hose 4m Packing 1SET/BOX,2SET/CTN N.W/G.W 17/18KGS Carton Size 56 x 45.5
20/7/2020· Reinforced Suction / Delivery Hose Green 10m x 2" Questions - page 2 y_2020, m_8, d_1, h_15CST bvseo_bulk, prod_bvqa, vn_bulk_3.0.10 cp_1, bvpage1 co_hasquestionsanswers, tq_23 loc_en_GB, sid_13658, prod, sort_[SortEntry(order=LOCALE, direction
25/7/2012· Specifics The AN nuers refer to the tubing OD in sixteenths of an inch. For example, 8AN hose has the same ID as a 1/2" nominal tube (8/16 = 1/2). 3AN hose has the same ID as a 3/16" tube. This means that 6AN hose will not introduce any appreciable flow
Big Size Pvc Thransparent Helix Discharge Hose- 6 Inch , Find Complete Details about Big Size Pvc Thransparent Helix Discharge Hose- 6 Inch,Pvc 6 Inch DIA POL PRODUCT HANDLING SUCTION DISCHARGE HOSE Meghna Petroleum : PROCUREMENT OF 3 Inch, 4 Inch 6 Inch DIA POL PROCUREMENT OF 3 6 DIA POL PRODUCT HANDLING SUCTION DISCHARGE HOSE
Insert a 1/2-inch wooden dowel into one end of the hose and check the fit. Try a 5/8-inch wooden dowel and a 3/4-inch dowel until you find the size that has the best fit. There''s no need to purchase dowels specifically to measure a garden hose. If you don''t have
It can be seen that using -08 Hose Size , Flow Velocity will be 18 feet per second, and for -10 Hose Size, Flow Velocity will be 11 feet per second. As the flow is continuous, -10 Hose Size is recommended.
Hydraulic Hose and Hose Asselies,Hydraulic Hose Asselies,T-Bolt , Worm Gear Hose Clamps,Hose Sleeve,Return , Suction Hose,Hose Clamps 1/4" x 12" 1/4 NPTM x 1/4 NPTM SAE 100R17 Hydraulic Hose Assely 3000 PSI Item Nuer: 916-1412 Out of Stock - More on Order
Home » reviews » Top 9 25 Inch Vacuum Hose reviews Tools & Home Improvement Top 9 25 Inch Vacuum Hose redtreegear July 27, 2020 1 0 Save Saved Removed 0 714 reviews analysed Rank Product Name Score Best value 1 2 1/2" x 20′ CLEAR PVC 9.6
George Antaki, Ramiz Gilada, in Nuclear Power Plant Safety and Mechanical Integrity, 2015Challenge 17: Leaking Expansion Joint Two parallel pumps take their suction from a vessel. The vessel-to-pumps suction pipe is 30 inch in diameter and consists of a vertical drop from the vessel bottom nozzle, through a stainless-steel (SS) expansion joint, and then to a header feeding each of the two pumps.
3/4” Myti-Flo® Hose. Extremely lightweight and portable, this all synthetic hose is designed for packing into remote areas, mop-up, hoseline and fire pump loion base protections. Precoupled in 50 foot sections. Hose SizeService/Burst PressureCoil Diameter/50
PARTS: Outer Cover LB(T)800-61 7 3/8" PARTS: Handle PARTS: Shaft Sleeve PARTS: Capacitor 110V-60Hz PARTS: Relay Unit 115V LB-800A-61
14/3/2016· Standardizing on a common suction hose size. Typically this lets you use six-inch hose on all your apparatus with 750- to 2,000-gpm pumps. This maximizes the six-inch hose available on the fireground for an extended horizontal lay, sometimes as long as


text: Prof. Ada Yonath, a world-class molecular biologist at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Rehovot, has been chosen to receive the $100,000 L'Oreal and UNESCO "For Women in Science" Life's Work Prize - one of only five awarded each year to outstanding female scientists on each continent. Yonath is the first Israeli to receive the prestigious prize after being nominated by the Education Ministry's UNESCO committee, which is the government's advisory body on UNESCO activities in Israel. As the recipient of the prize, Yonath is recognized as this year's leading woman scientist in Europe. Education Minister Yuli Tamir sent a message of congratulations to Yonath upon hearing the news Sunday. The five prizes will be awarded at UNESCO headquarters in Paris this March by UNESCO director-general Koichiro Matsuura and World L'Oreal director-general Sir Lindsey Evan-Jones. The prize was established in 1998 with a panel of international judges to promote the advancement of women in science. Yonath, who was born in Jerusalem in 1939, is a crystallographer best known for her pioneering work on the structure of ribosomes. She received her PhD at the Rehovot institute and accepted postdoctoral positions at MIT and Carnegie Mellon University. In 1970 she established what was for nearly a decade the only protein crystallography laboratory in Israel. Her research focuses on the mechanisms underlying protein biosynthesis by ribosomal crystallography, a research line she pioneered more than two decades ago despite much skepticism within the international scientific community. Yonath elucidated the modes of action of over 20 different antibiotics targeting the ribosome, explained the mechanism of drug resistance and the structural basis for antibiotic selectivity and showed how it plays a key role in clinical usefulness and therapeutic effectiveness, thus paving the way for structure-based drug design. Nava Ravid, the managing director of L'Oreal-Israel, the local branch of the international cosmetics company, said, "As a woman, I am proud and excited over the selection of Prof. Yonath in 2008, the 10th anniversary of the prize." She noted that in the 100 years of the Nobel Prize, 514 men and only 12 women have received it, but L'Oreal was committed and honored to support the advancement of women scientists all over the world.

domain: biology


text:
Syria and Regional Food Security
Syria and its neighbors all have a vested interest in resuming agricultural trade to increase food security across the region.
As military activity in Syria winds down, likely resumption of agricultural trade will in turn improve the outlook for food security. This will benefit all parties involved in the conflict in Syria, whether pro-government or pro-rebel, as well as neighboring countries. Restored regional food security does not only mean enhanced and stable access to food for millions of displaced Syrians, but also an improved livelihood for many agricultural and refugee host communities in neighboring countries.
With a unique position as a trade corridor and a trade bottleneck in the Middle East, Syria offers access to regional agricultural markets for Lebanon, Turkey, Iraq and Jordan, all of which have been heavily affected by the Syrian war and continue to host large numbers of refugees. In fact, Syria plays an even larger role in global agricultural trade, connecting supply routes to Eastern Europe, Central Asia, Russia, and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries.
The Syria crisis prompted two major trends that worsened food insecurity in the region. The first is the decline in total agricultural trade with and through Syria. Trade routes shifted to avoid military action and/or closed borders. These longer and often riskier routes—controlled by militias, the Islamic State (IS), or even government forces demanding “passage facilitation fees”—raised transportation costs and disrupted supply chains. In addition, there was a decline in overall agricultural production, not just in Syria but also in neighboring countries due to such factors as population displacement, limited access to water, and military activity. These two trends became a vicious cycle that has had tremendous negative consequences for stakeholders in the agriculture and food supply chains, from producers and consumers to traders and governments. Furthermore, it has led to a shortage of basic foods, price hikes, and a loss in revenues.
Prior to the war, there were several trading routes for food supply to, from, and through Syria. Lebanon exported its agriculture and food produce to Syria primarily through its Masnaa crossing. From there, the food produce journeyed on to Jordan through the Nassib crossing on the Syrian–Jordanian border and then to the GCC. Turkey exported its produce through two major routes: the first to Syria through the Bab al-Hawa crossing and then onto Jordan and the GCC. The second passed through the Nusaybin crossing to the Iraqi border crossings of either Rabia or Abu Kamal. Jordan and Iraq also depended on the Syria corridor to import their food supplies from Europe and Russia via Lebanese and Syrian ports. The Syrian war rerouted the food supply chains for all countries. Lebanon and Turkey had to shift supply routes to the GCC to maritime and aerial freight, while Jordan relied on receiving its imports through Israel and its southern port in Aqaba. Iraq’s imports from Turkey are currently funneled through the Kurdistan Region of Iraq.
Syria continues to be a major trading partner for all its neighboring countries. Consequently, the closing of its borders has severely affected the formal trade that occurs between Syria and Jordan. For example, food and agriculture exports from Jordan to Syria dropped from around $89 million in 2010 to $27 million in 2016, and imports dropped from around $272 million to $64 million over the same period. Syrian farmers and exporters lost an important export destination, while traders and consumers in Jordan lost a major food source. In Jordan, this has contributed to high inflation in food prices—already affected by the influx of around 2 million Syrian refugees—which have fueled recent demonstrations. However, the ongoing normalization of political and trade relations between the two countries, as exemplified by the reopening of borders in 2018 and the resumption of bilateral food trade, will help to relieve these tensions and restore the livelihoods of Syrian families returning to rural agricultural areas, especially in Syria’s south around Daraa and Wadi Hauran.
Restoring the trade routes through Syria would also help the ailing Lebanese economy. Although Lebanon has increased exports, it has not been able to capitalize on this increase due to higher transportation costs. In 2016, Lebanon’s food exports to the GCC, particularly Saudi Arabia and the UAE, rose to $263 million—despite the closure of the Jordanian borders—compared to $214 million in 2012, when the Jordanian border was still open. Iraq, a secondary destination for Lebanese food and agriculture products, imported around $40 million worth of products, up from around $30 million prior to the Syria conflict. Nevertheless, Lebanese exporters shifted their transport routes to maritime and air freight in order to avoid Syrian territory. This method costs around 60 percent more than land transport, eating into the profits of these exports. Although some sporadic trade continued overland into Iraq, traders had to pay more freight insurance in addition to unpredictable costs of paying off local militias.
In addition to higher transportation costs, increased water scarcity, and competition from Syrian smugglers seeking to fetch higher prices in Lebanon, shifting trade routes have contributed to an overall reduction in agricultural production within Lebanon. Not only has this raised domestic food prices, but Syrian refugees—upon whom the Lebanese agricultural sector relies heavily for labor—are losing work opportunities with the decline of agricultural activity. Meanwhile, the Lebanese government is losing both tax revenue from production exports and increasing its trade deficit. Lebanese farmers and food industrialists praised the reopening of the Nassib border crossing between Jordan and Syria in October 2018 and have started to organically export through Syria and Jordan at their own risk. However, the Lebanese government has not yet legislated on this opportunity, as it needs to overcome internal political differences between its pro-regime and anti-regime constituents. Only then will it be able to coordinate with the Syrian government to facilitate passage of Lebanese food exports through Syria.
For Iraq, the resumption of trade is particularly vital in addressing food insecurity in the recently liberated governorates of Anbar, Salahuddin, and Nineveh. Largely cut off from the rest of Iraq when under Islamic State rule between 2014 and 2017, and later cut off from IS-controlled trade routes in eastern Syria, these predominantly Sunni Arab governorates have not yet been able to return to a level of agricultural activity that ensures food security. Large swaths of former agricultural land across Salahuddin, Nineveh, and Kirkuk—the breadbasket provinces of Iraq—still lacked vegetation in the 2017 and 2018 growing and harvesting seasons. This is partly because Iraqi internally displaced persons (IDPs) have been reluctant to return. But even in areas where displaced people have returned, there has not been sufficient government support to resume agricultural activity, whether by rebuilding damaged irrigation canals, providing seeds, or subsidizing the cost of production.
Prior to the Syrian crisis, Syrian agricultural exports—consisting mainly of foodstuffs and animal products—generated $1.1 billion. Since 2014, the Abu Kamal, Tanf, and Rabia border crossings between Syria and Iraq have remained closed to commercial traffic, cutting off this trade apart from some smuggling. Cross-border animal trade and the free movement of herds are particularly essential for safeguarding local sources of food in war-struck provinces such as Anbar and Nineveh. Almost one third of Iraq’s total 13.5 million sheep, cattle, and goats and 39 million poultry was lost in IS-dominated governorates of Nineveh, Salahuddin, Kirkuk, and Anbar. This was due to a number of reasons: livestock was killed during clashes; stolen amid the security vacuum; fell foul to diseases due to lack of veterinary access; or confiscated by IS and sold on local markets to keep meat prices low and accessible to the public. Access to livestock, therefore, would enable local economic activity through dairy production and cottage industries, both of which are a major source of primary income for female-headed households and displaced families. This would help stabilize these provinces in the absence of reconstruction aid from the paralyzed government in Baghdad.
Furthermore, the rest of Iraq would also benefit in the short term from importing food from Syria to make up for diminished production, thereby addressing the poor conditions in these war-torn governorates and also dwindling water supplies caused by dams built by Turkey and Iran. Similarly, Kurdistan would benefit from decreasing its dependency on Turkey, currently its main food supply and trade corridor, and (to a lesser extent) Iran, which has been sealing off its borders with the region due to increased Kurdish guerilla fighting within Iran.
For Turkey, food security for border areas in Anatolia would likewise improve if northern Syria were to become more stable. Even though food and agriculture exports from Turkey to Syria grew from around $200 million in 2010 to around $600 million in 2016—despite the formal closure of borders—stability in northern Syria would likely see refugees return from Turkey. This would not significantly change the national food supply but would bring down the cost, especially in major urban areas and the border towns of Antakya, Gaziantep, Sanliurfa, Hatay, Adana, Mersin, Kilis, and Mardin. While Turkey already exports around $600 million of food informally to rebel-held areas—and through them to the rest of Syria—an open border could restore trade routes for its fresh vegetables, fruits, and meats to the GCC markets. In 2016, these exports were worth at least $1.2 billion and are currently being shipped or flown daily at higher transportation costs.
Above all, Syria itself would benefit the most from restored food trade in the region. Not only could customs and taxes on the transit of food and agriculture products provide much-needed income for reconstruction, the resumption of food exports is necessary to relaunch the agribusiness sector in Syria, the second largest employer after the government. Prior to the war, Syria exported around $3 billion worth of food and agriculture products. Agriculture continues to account for at least 26 percent of Syria’s GDP and provides a social safety net for around 6.7 million Syrians. With increasing focus on reconstruction, investment in agriculture could recoup the $16 billionof damages to the sector accrued during the war.
Syria and its neighbors all have a vested interest in regaining regional food security. Even if a comprehensive political settlement for the Syrian conflict remains elusive, food security—within Syria and regionally—should be the basis for the cessation of hostilities and a common ground for starting reconstruction within Syria, resuming bilateral trade arrangements, and reinvigorating political dialogue.
This article is reprinted with permission of Sada. It can be accessed online here.
Hadi Fathallah is an economist and policy adviser at NAMEA Group; a fellow of the Cornell Institute for Public Affairs; and a member of the Global Shapers Community, an initiative of the World Economic Forum. The designations and data employed in this piece do not necessarily reflect the expression of the author or NAMEA Group concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or political solution to the Syrian crisis. Follow him on Twitter @Hadi_FAO.Read More
Subscribe to Our Newsletter