text:
Issue 3: March 2009
Edition 3 - March 2009 includes a summary of the February 2009 decisions.These summaries are prepared by the Presidential Unit and are designed to provide a brief overview of, and introduction to, the most recent Presidential and Court of Appeal decisions.
Welcome to the Third edition of ‘On Appeal’.
Edition 3 - March 2009 includes a summary of the February 2009 decisions.
These summaries are prepared by the Presidential Unit and are designed to provide a brief overview of, and introduction to, the most recent Presidential and Court of Appeal decisions. They are not intended to be a substitute for reading the decisions in full, nor are they a substitute for a decision maker’s independent research.
Please note that the following abbreviations are used throughout these summaries:
Acting Deputy President
Approved Medical Specialist
Application to Resolve a Dispute
Workers Compensation Commission
Certificate of Determination
Medical Assessment Certificate
Reply to Application to Resolve a Dispute
Whole Person Impairment
Workers Compensation Act 1987
Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998
Workers Compensation Commission Rules 2006
Workers Compensation Regulation 2003
Section 40 of the 1987 Act – partial incapacity
(i) Probable earnings - ability to earn
Doyle v Q Catering Riverside Pty Ltd (formerly known as Caterair Airport Services (Sydney) Pty Ltd)  NSWWCCPD 14
9 February 2009
- From September 1996 until 25 October 2007, Ms Doyle worked for Caterair as a catering assistant lifting and carrying goods onto aircraft. In the course of her employment she sustained a variety of injuries including injury to her right shoulder and arm on 29 September 2001 and 28 January 2003; to her right foot and ankle on 10 September 2004 and to her lower back and right leg on 7 September 2007. She performed her usual duties until her resignation on 24 September 2007.
- In a report dated 6 November 2007 Dr Bodel, orthopaedic surgeon, took a history of Ms Doyle’s injuries to her right shoulder in September 2001 and January 2003. He recorded that after each injury she remained on light duties for a number of months but was able to return to normal duties. Dr Bodel concluded that Ms Doyle had rotator cuff pathology in her right shoulder with associated pain and stiffness and that the overall prognosis was reasonable from a musculoskeletal point of view and that she should be capable of a return to her pre-injury style of work should it be available to her. In a separate report dated 6 November 2007, Dr Bodel assessed Ms Doyle to have a 10% permanent loss of efficient use of her right arm at or above the elbow due to her September 2001 injury.
- On 17 January 2008 Dr Bodel clarified his opinion as to Ms Doyle’s fitness for her pre-injury style of work noting that at the time of his assessment in November 2007 he felt that Ms Doyle was “fit for part time light duty activities with a 10-12kg lifting limit initially and over a period of three to four months she may be able to upgrade [to] full time pre injury duties” and that if she was able to do so, she should be able to upgrade to fulltime work in a permanently modified basis with a 15kg maximum lifting limit.
- On 27 June 2008 Ms Doyle settled a claim for lump sum compensation in the sum of $8,000 in respect of an agreed 10% permanent loss of efficient use of her dominant right arm at or above the elbow as a result of her September 2001 injury.
- On 4 July 2008 Ms Doyle filed an ARD in the Commission claiming weekly compensation in the sum of $770.00 from 25 October 2007 to date and continuing (this was amended at the arbitration hearing to date from 14 December 2007).
- The Arbitrator found in favour of Ms Doyle in respect of section 40 and awarded weekly compensation at the rate of $270.00 per week from 14 December 2007 to 6 March 2008 with an award for Caterair thereafter.
- The Arbitrator noted that:
- Ms Doyle’s work with Caterair was a “heavy job” and that she was having difficulties with her employment as a result of her injuries .
- Ms Doyle had accepted the sum of $25,000 upon her resignation and he was not persuaded that Ms Doyle’s resignation was a result of her shoulder injury .
- Ms Doyle was right hand dominant and had a permanent impairment of the right shoulder, therefore alternative duties such as food preparation or as a retail sales assistant may not have been appropriate. Given her specific lifting and overhead use restrictions as set out by Dr Bodel “quite a number of potential job options would not be available to her in the open labour market.”
- Ms Doyle had been fit for normal duties on a full time basis for the period from 24 April 2003 to at least September 2007 regarding her accepted right shoulder and arm injuries .
- Caterair’s submission, that the reason for the lack of medical certification to substantiate Ms Doyle’s claim for on-going incapacity was that there was no support for that contention, was persuasive .
- With the exception of the period from 6 November 2007 to 6 March 2008, Ms Doyle had been at all material times fit “for pre-injury duties” .
- In the period from 14 December 2007 to 6 March 2008 Ms Doyle could reasonably secure earnings of $500.00 per week in some similar work within her specified restrictions , but that, based on Dr Bodel’s evidence, there was no incapacity from 6 March 2008.
Ms Doyle appealed the Arbitrator’s decision alleging error:
- in finding Ms Doyle had no incapacity or could earn her pre-injury earnings as at 6 March 2008;
- in his interpretation of Dr Bodel’s opinion;
- in failing to provide adequate reasons as to how Ms Doyle’s incapacity ceased, or that she was able to earn her pre-injury earnings, and
- in drawing the inference that due to the lack of medical certificates subsequent to Ms Doyle’s termination of employment, she was not incapacitated.
- The Arbitrator’s reasoning disclosed an error in his approach to the assessment of Ms Doyle’s entitlement to weekly compensation. It was not a question of whether Ms Doyle could perform her “usual” or “pre-injury” duties, but whether the injury left her in such a position that in the open labour market her earning capacity was less than before the injury  Workers Compensation in New South Wales, 2nd ed, by C P Mills; Alexander v Ashfield Municipal Council CA 78/8, unreported 27.10.82; Ric Developments t/as Lane Cove Poolmart v Muir  NSWCA 155.
- The Arbitrator’s conclusion assumed that Dr Bodel’s “optimistic” prognosis had become a reality by 6 March 2008. There was no basis for this assumption. Even if Dr Bodel’s alternative scenario, that she “should” be able to upgrade to full time work on a permanently modified basis with a 15kg-lifting limit, was correct, the Arbitrator failed to consider the consequences of such a restriction on the open labour market.
- The Arbitrator failed to acknowledge the difference between actual earnings (whilst employed) and ability to earn (whilst unemployed). When a worker is employed his or her actual earnings will be prima facie evidence of the ability to earn: Aitkin v Goodyear Tyre and Rubber Co (Aust) Ltd (1945) 46 SR (NSW) 20; however, once that employment ceases the Commission is then required to determine what the worker is able to earn in suitable employment in the labour market readily accessible to that worker: Hamilton v Shelton, Iron, Steel and Coal Co (1926) 96 LJKB 295 at 301, applied in Steggles Pty Ltd v Aguirre (1988) 12 NSWLR 693.
- Ms Doyle’s evidence in regards to her lifting duties while working with Caterair; the evidence that Ms Doyle had a permanent 10% loss of efficient use of her dominant arm and Dr Bodel’s evidence of a 15kg lifting restriction suggested that Ms Doyle had a disability that would restrict her ability to find and retain suitable employment in the labour market accessible to her. The Arbitrator failed to properly consider the impact of that restriction.
- The Arbitrator was required to assess Ms Doyle’s ability to earn having regard to the whole of the evidence, including the nature of the injury and disability, her age, education and training, work experience. The Arbitrator failed to properly undertake that exercise and failed to explain why her incapacity ceased on 6 March 2008.
- The Arbitrator erred in drawing an adverse inference from Ms Doyle’s failure to tender any medical certificates to substantiate her claim. That failure was not unexplained . In any event, Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 “licences, but does not compel, the drawing of inferences when a witness is not called” (per Campbell JA in Howell v Macquarie University  CA 26 at ).
- Whilst the state of the medical evidence was most unsatisfactory, it was not open to the Arbitrator to infer that there was no support for Ms Doyle’s “contention” of an ongoing incapacity. Support for Ms Doyle’s incapacity came from the uncontested evidence of Dr Bodel.
Due to the unsatisfactory state of the evidence DP Roche was unable to re-determine the matter and remitted it to a different Arbitrator. He noted that careful consideration be given to the preparation and presentation of the case at the re-determination and that the evidence be updated, expanded and clarified.
11 February 2009
- Mr Ledingham was a cotton farm hand. His duties included tractor driving, maintenance and irrigation work. On 7 February 2001, he injured his back while carrying a drum of weed-killer. He was off work for a period of time before he resumed work on light duties and then returned to his pre-injury duties full-time.
- Mr Ledingham ceased work with Glen Cotton on 27 October 2003 partly because of ongoing back problems. He then worked in a variety of similar farm labouring jobs until February 2005, when he changed to more sedentary work. He remained in employment until July 2007 but has been unemployed since.
- In 2004, he brought proceedings in the Commission seeking lump sum compensation. He settled in May 2005, receiving payment in respect of 5% permanent impairment of his back and a 6% loss of use of his sexual organs.
- In July 2008 Mr Smith filed an ARD in the Commission seeking weekly benefits of compensation from 1 July 2001 to date and continuing (although Mr Ledingham remained at work with Glen Cotton until 27 October 2003).
The Arbitrator’s decision:
- The Arbitrator made findings that Mr Ledingham’s probable weekly earnings were $800.00, adopting the amount he was earning at the date of termination of employment with Glen Cotton. He awarded Mr Ledingham weekly benefits at various rates from 17 February 2005 to date and continuing. He made no award during the period 28 October 2003 to 16 February 2005 on the grounds that Mr Ledingham was able to earn on average $800.00 per week. The evidence disclosed that he was able to earn during that period amounts ranging from approximately $250.00 to $1,300.00 per week.
Issues on appeal:
- Mr Ledingham appealed the Arbitrator’s decision alleging error:
- in the calculation of his probable weekly earnings, and
- in failing to award weekly benefits for the period between 28 October 2003 and 9 February 2005 (changed to 16 February 2005 by ADP Moore on review)
(1) There was no evidence that Mr Ledingham suffered any economic incapacity after being declared fit for pre-injury duties in August 2001 up until his resignation in October 2003.
(2) The Arbitrator’s calculation of probable earnings confirmed.
(3) The calculation of probable earnings was consistent with the decision of President Keating in Plumbers Supplies Cooperative Limited v Behnampirouz  NSWWCCPD 47 at  and also Deputy President Roche in Miller v A & R Pearson Pty Limited  NSWWCCPD 111 where he stated at :
“In determining probable earnings the following principles are applicable:
- it must be assumed that the worker’s pre-injury job continued, even if that is not in fact the case (Nicholson at 54), applied in Singh v TAJ (Sydney) Pty Limited  NSWCA 330. It is a hypothetical calculation;
- a determination must be made of the worker’s probable earnings “as a worker” had he or she remained uninjured and remained employed in the “same or some comparable employment”, and
- regard must be had to the whole of the evidence.”
(4) For the period between 28 October 2003 and 16 February 2005 there was clear evidence that Mr Ledingham had an incapacity on the open labour market (see Ranvet Pty Ltd v Vasilevski  NSWWCCPD 81 at -).
(5) Whilst actual earnings are prima facie evidence of ability to earn regard must still be had to whether that amount is “proper” in all the circumstances. As the Court of Appeal said in Aitkin v Goodyear Tyre & Rubber Co (Aust) Ltd (1945) 46 SR (NSW) 20 at 22:
“As to the phrase ‘is earning’, it has been held that if the partially incapacitated worker is earning something, his actual earnings must prima facie be taken as the basis ….If, however, it is proved that his actual earnings are not a proper test, because there is some reason unconnected with his earning power which makes his earning power lower than should be, the other alternative, what he is ‘able to earn’, must be adopted. This is so where it is shown that he is deliberately taking lower-paid work than he could get, or is idling and on this account receiving less than he could be reasonably expected to obtain…”
(6) There was no suggestion that Mr Ledingham was idling or not using his best endeavours to find suitable work.
(7) In applying section 40(2)(b) of the 1987 Act and also taking into consideration sections 40(3) and 43A of the 1987 Act, the “average” weekly amount which Mr Ledingham was earning in suitable employment during the period under review was $700.00 per week.
Order: Revoked and decision substituted.
(ii) Concurrent employment - true value of labour
25 February 2009
- Mr Mammo received injury in the course of his employment as a security guard with AVS when he was assaulted. At that time he had concurrent employment as an engineer. It was not in dispute that Mr Mammo received injury to his left arm, neck and left leg.
- Mr Mammo alleged that despite his injuries, AVS refused him permission to take time off work and that he was compelled to perform his normal duties, which he continued up until April 2004. At that time he ceased work as a security guard. He was to resume such employment at a later date.
- On 31 May 2006 he underwent surgery on his left shoulder and made a claim for compensation. AVS’ insurer accepted liability in respect of medical expenses and weekly payments were voluntarily paid to Mr Mammo between 31 May 2006 and 15 May 2007.
- On 31 August 2007 Mr Mammo underwent surgery on his left knee. A further claim for compensation was made for weekly benefits from April 2004 and continuing, medical expenses and lump sums pursuant to sections 66 and 67 of the 1987 Act. On 11 June 2008 Mr Mammo filed an ARD in the Commission.
- The Arbitrator ordered AVS to pay Mr Mammo weekly benefits for the periods 31 May 2006 to 7 July 2006 and 31 August 2007 to 28 September 2007 at the rate of $1,079.77 per week with an award for AVS in relation to all other periods claimed.
The Arbitrator, in addressing the issue as to whether Mr Mammo had established that he was partially incapacitated for work during the relevant periods, referred to the decision of the High Court in Arnott’s Snack Products v Yacob (1985) 155 CLR 171 (‘Arnotts’) and the decision of the Court of Appeal in Mitchell v Central West Health Service (1997) 14 NSWCCR 526 (‘Mitchell’).
She found on the evidence, there was no “incapacity” in the Arnott’s sense of a reduction in earning capacity and as a result of performing the Mitchell calculation there was no shortfall between probable and actual post injury earnings and no demonstrable reduction in earning power related to his injuries, save for the two periods following surgery in which Mr Mammo was totally incapacitated.
Mr Mammo appealed submitting that the Arbitrator had erred in:
- her conclusions concerning the existence and extent of any incapacity suffered by him, and
- her determination as to his entitlement to weekly compensation.
(1) The dispute between the parties required a determination of the fundamental question of whether the evidence established that Mr Mammo had suffered physical incapacity for actually doing work in the labour market in which he worked or may reasonable be expected to work.
(2) If such incapacity was found it was then necessary to examine the evidence adduced as to Mr Mammo’s probable earnings but for injury and ability to earn in terms of section 40 of the 1987 Act (see Williams v Metropolitan Coal Co Ltd (1948) 76 CLR 432 per Dixon J at 449) .
(3) Mr Mammo suffered periods of total incapacity following the shoulder surgery from 31 May 2006 to 7 July 2006 and following the knee surgery from 31 August 2007 to 28 September 2007. In substituting his own orders, ADP O’Grady agreed that the weekly rate for the first period was (rounded up) $1,080.00 however, made a finding that during the second period, Mr Mammo, having earlier received voluntary payments for a period exceeding 26 weeks, was entitled to the maximum statutory rate payable to a worker with a dependent wife and two dependent children ($608.70 per week).
(4) Mr Mammo had since April 2004, (excluding the periods from outlined above), suffered partial incapacity up to at least 9 January 2008 based on the nature of the injuries, the resultant disabilities and the restrictions noted by the various medical practitioners. That incapacity was only in respect of the most strenuous duties required of a security officer. Mr Mammo had made no allegation of any incapacity to perform engineering work by reason of the injuries.
(5) In applying Mitchell, in three of the four relevant periods there was no difference between Mr Mammo’s probable earnings and actual earnings or ability to earn. During certain periods Mr Mammo had, for taxation purposes, sought to offset substantial business expenses against his gross income of $1600.00 per week as an engineering sub-contractor.
(6) On the principles in Cage Developments Pty Limited v Schubert (1983) 151 CLR 584, the true value of the labour performed by Mr Mammo in the course of his engineering work at relevant times was $1600.00 per week. That sum exceeded his probable earnings thus he was not entitled to an award of weekly compensation during those periods .
(7) Whilst Mr Mammo had a prima facie entitlement to weekly compensation during the period of 1 July 2005 to 31 May 2006, an analysis of the earning figures for that period revealed a higher figure from security work, than earlier demonstrated and an unexplained low figure generated by his work as an engineer. It was concluded that those actual earnings did not properly demonstrate Mr Mammo’s ability to earn. Mr Mammo’s true ability to earn from both sources of employment was $1250.00 per week, and he had no entitlement to weekly award during that period .
(iii) Evidence - speculative
27 February 2009
- Mr Formosa, after leaving school at the age of 13, worked in the chicken industry performing unskilled manual work. In 1995 he commenced employment with Express Transport (formerly Red Lea Chickens) and worked there until 5 December 2005 when he injured his back while lifting tubs of chickens.
- On 3 October 2007, an Arbitrator determined that Mr Formosa was totally incapacitated for work and an award of weekly compensation was made.
- On 4 September 2008 Express Transport sought a review of the weekly payments because of a change of circumstances, pursuant to section 55 of the 1987 Act, claiming that Mr Formosa was partially incapacitated and no longer totally incapacitated for work.
- Relying on the evidence of Mr Formosa’s gym strengthening training and various medical reports Mr Formosa’s physical condition had improved such that he was no longer totally incapacitated for work and could undertake suitable duties.
- The Arbitrator relied on the opinion of Dr Bodel, dated 11 June 2008, where he stated that Mr Formosa was capable of a wide range of full time work activities, subject to a lifting restriction of 15kgs, for initially a period of four hours a day, five days a week and that “with continued work hardening and appropriately modified duties he may be able to upgrade to full time permanently modified duties within a four month period”. The Arbitrator adopted a longer period of 5.5 months commencing from the date of his determination.
- There had been a ‘change of circumstances’ within the meaning of section 55, since the 3 October 2007 award. He ordered Express Transport to pay Mr Formosa weekly compensation at the statutory rate for a single worker under section 40 from 1 June 2008 to 19 November 2008 and then at the rate of $171.30 from 20 November 2008 and continuing.
- Mr Formosa would be able to secure suitable employment as a process worker within the meaning of section 40(3) and 43A of the 1987 Act, provided there was no requirement for the taking of inventories or checking orders and other limitations. Mr Formosa would have been in a better position to secure a position had he continued with the assistance of a rehabilitation specialist.
- Relying on a report by Recovre, the average weekly amount Mr Formosa would be able to earn in suitable employment after injury would initially be $332.00 and upon commencement of full-time work, $548.70. In applying the five steps in Mitchell v Central West Health Service (1997) 14 NSWWCCR 528 (‘Mitchell’) and noting that the parties had agreed that Mr Formosa’s pre-injury earnings were $720.00 per week, the Arbitrator did not consider it appropriate to further reduce the amount of weekly earning.
Issues on appeal:
Mr Formosa appealed this decision on the sole ground that the Arbitrator had erred in his application of section 40 of the 1987.
(1) The Arbitrator’s finding that Mr Formosa would be in a better position had he continued with rehabilitation assistance was speculative .
(2) There was insufficient evidence before the Arbitrator to enable him to make the finding that Mr Formosa was capable of full time work at the date of the determination (20 November 2008) and in doing so he made an error of fact.
(3) The lack of co-operation by Mr Formosa in terms of training and rehabilitation was not a matter that the Arbitrator should have taken into account in determining his ability to earn in suitable employment (step 2 of Mitchell) and to the extent he did so was an error of law .
Orders: Revoked and remitted to another Arbitrator for determination afresh.
Hearing loss – further loss - estoppel
Boilermaker’s deafness; claim for further hearing loss; section 17 of the 1987 Act; estoppel; effect of prior Medical Panel assessments under section 131 of the 1987 Act and section 122 of the 1998 Act; effect of prior unsuccessful claim for the cost of hearing aids before the former Compensation Court of NSW.
5 February 2009
- Mr Prisk started work with the Department as a member of its ground staff in 1974 and, later, as a driver. His employment exposed him to noise and he first noticed a problem with his hearing in or about 1995.
- In 1996 Mr Prisk claimed compensation for hearing loss. A Medical Panel dated 5 November 1996 assessed him to have 6.7% binaural hearing loss due to boilermaker’s deafness, and a 19% hearing loss in his left ear and 22% hearing loss in his right ear of uncertain origin. He settled his claim for compensation under section 66 of the 1987 Act for $5,761.66 in respect of 6.7% binaural hearing loss in Terms of Settlement filed with the Compensation Court on 24 July 1997. The terms noted his “notional date of injury pursuant to s17” to be 12 October 1995, but made no note about the cause of the hearing loss of uncertain origin.
- In 1998 Mr Prisk was unsuccessful in a claim for hearing aids. Curtis CCJ referred to the Medical Panel finding in the previous claim, which did not establish from which loss the need for the hearing aids arose. His Honour noted the binaural hearing loss of uncertain origin to be 19.7%.
- In 2002 Mr Prisk made a claim for further hearing loss. A Medical Panel dated 19 November 2002 assessed him to have, after adjustment for presbycusis, a binaural hearing loss of 7.6% due to boilermaker’s deafness, and a 21% hearing loss in his left ear and a 23% hearing loss in his right ear of uncertain origin. He settled this claim under section 66 of the 1987 Act for $585.00 in respect of 0.9% further binaural hearing loss in Terms of Settlement filed with the Court on 1 April 2003. The terms noted his “notional date of injury pursuant to s17” to be 21 December 2001, but made no note about the cause of the hearing loss of uncertain origin.
- In 2006 Mr Prisk made a fourth claim for hearing loss in respect of 15% “further WPI” with a deemed date of injury of 7 June 2006. Allianz denied liability on the ground that Mr Prisk was “estopped from claiming that the entirety of [his] hearing loss [was] an injury in the nature of a disease of gradual process caused by exposure to industrial noise.”
- At the arbitration on 28 March 2007, the Arbitrator determined that Mr Prisk suffered an injury on 7 June 2006, being a further hearing loss which was of such a nature as to be caused by a disease of gradual onset. The matter was referred to an AMS, Dr Fernandes, who assessed 11% WPI after finding 29.2% binaural hearing loss, and deducting the 7.6% loss paid in the previous settlements. He made no deduction for hearing loss of uncertain origin. On appeal by the Department, a MAP confirmed the findings and assessments by Dr Fernandes.
- At a further hearing on 31 January 2008, the Department argued that Mr Prisk was bound by an estoppel arising from Curtis CCJ’s decision and the previous Medical Panel certificates to the effect that 19.7% of Mr Prisk’s binaural hearing loss was of uncertain origin and therefore unrelated to his employment. The Arbitrator did not determine the estoppel issue but held that the MAC was not conclusively presumed to be correct because no medical dispute had been properly referred to Dr Fernandes and his certification with respect to those matters was invalid. He referred the matter back to Dr Fernandes for him to assess the degree of permanent impairment as a result of the injury on 7 June 2006 and whether any proportion of that impairment was due to any previous injury or pre-existing condition or abnormality.
- On 14 April 2008 Dr Fernandes issued an Amended MAC with the same assessment as the first MAC, that is, 11% WPI as a result of the further hearing loss deemed to have happened on 7 June 2006, with no deduction for hearing loss of uncertain origin.
- Following a further teleconference and written submissions, the Arbitrator determined on 10 June 2008 that the matter be referred back to Dr Fernandes again to assess permanent impairment from the injury of further hearing loss on 7 June 2006 and directed the AMS to deduct any proportion of permanent impairment resulting from the hearing loss previously identified in 1997, the hearing loss of uncertain origin (19.7%) and the further hearing loss identified in 2002.
- On 25 July 2008, Dr Fernandes’ third MAC, in accordance with the Arbitrator’s decision of 10 June 2008, assessed 1% WPI.
The Arbitrator’s decision:
Mr Prisk appealed the Arbitrator’s decision of 10 June 2008 but leave to appeal was refused because the order was of an interlocutory nature (Prisk v Department of Ageing, Disability and Homecare  NSWWCCPD 106).
The matter was remitted to the same Arbitrator whose final determination, dated 20 October 2008, awarded $1,250 in respect of 1% WPI in accordance with Dr Fernandes’ assessment. Mr Prisk sought leave to appeal the Arbitrator’s determination of 20 October 2008.
Issues on appeal:
Mr Prisk argued that the arbitrator erred in holding an issue estoppel arose from the decision of Curtis CCJ or from the previous Medical Panel assessments.
(1) Curtis CCJ’s finding created an estoppel as to Mr Prisk’s entitlement to hearing aids as at the date of that decision. It created no other estoppel because “where the conclusion is against the existence of a right or claim which in point of law depends upon a number of ingredients or ultimate facts the absence of any one of which would be enough to defeat the claim, the estoppel covers only the actual ground upon which the existence of the right was negatived.” (per Dixon J observed in Blair v Curran (1939) 62 CLR 464). ,
(2) The present claim concerned a separate cause of action, namely, a claim in respect of a further loss of hearing with a deemed date of injury of 7 June 2006. Mr Prisk established that, as at 7 June 2006, he was employed in employment to the nature of which the further loss was due. Given that finding, which was not challenged, the question of the nature and extent of Mr Prisk’s hearing loss resulting from that injury was a matter for the AMS, who’s certification was “conclusively presumed to be correct” as to the degree of permanent impairment as a result of an injury (section 326(1)(a) of the 1998 Act). The AMS was correctly asked, when preparing his Amended MAC, to take into account the prior binaural hearing loss of 7.6% (for which compensation had been paid), which he did. Therefore, there was no basis for a third referral to the AMS .
(3) The conclusive evidence from the AMS was that Mr Prisk’s hearing loss was not of uncertain origin, but was “occupational”. Therefore, what was uncertain at the time of Curtis CCJ’s decision and the previous Medical Panel certificates was certified as certain in a document that is conclusively presumed to be correct under the terms of the 1998 Act . Therefore, even if Curtis CCJ had made a formal finding of the kind urged by the Department as to the cause of Mr Prisk’s hearing loss as at the date of his decision, that finding would not stop the Commission, when dealing with a different cause of action at a later date, from making a different finding on the basis of additional evidence conclusively presumed to be correct .
(4) Terms of settlement can give rise to res judicata estoppels in certain circumstances (Rail Services Australia v Dimovski  NSWCA 267 (2004) 1 DDCR 648 (‘Dimovski’)), though the nature and extent of such an estoppel will depend on the facts and circumstances of each case  and .
(5) Though issue estoppels can arise from Consent Orders (see Rinker Group Limited v Mackell  NSWWCCPD 100), there is no estoppel in a changing situation and a later claim for hearing loss compensation as a result of a further injury is one example of such a situation. (The Doctrine of Res Judicata by Spencer Bower, Turner and Handley at  and ; Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd v The National Competition Council  FCA 598; Cleverley v Gas Light and Coke Co (1907) 24 TLR 93; O’Donel v Commissioner for Road Transport (1938) 59 CLR 744 (‘O’Donel’)) . Applying the principles in O’Donel and Dimovski to the present matter it was clear that there was “much other evidence” (including a binding MAC)relating to the cause of Mr Prisk’s hearing loss at a later date .
(6) Mr Prisk was bound by the previous Terms of Settlement under which he was paid for a binaural hearing loss of 7.6%. That amount was deducted by the AMS in making his calculations .
The Amended MAC was validly issued and the Arbitrator erred in requesting a third MAC. The Arbitrator’s decision was therefore revoked and an award was made for Mr Prisk in accordance with the findings of the Amended MAC for 11% WPI as a result of his injury of further hearing loss deemed under section 17 of the 1987 Act to have happened on 7 June 2006.
Mr Prisk to have costs of the employer’s unsuccessful appeal to the Medical Appeal Panel and the arbitral appeal.
Delay in making claim - failure to discharge onus re: ignorance of rights
4 February 2009
- The Orchestra employed Mr Westlake as a principal clarinettist during the periods 29 June 1954 to 2 December 1954 and between 4 April 1960 and 17 March 1978. In July 2007 Mr Westlake made a claim for industrial deafness, which was disputed by the insurer.
- Mr Westlake lodged an ARD on 2 July 2008 claiming 7.4% binaural hearing loss ($3,848.00) and digital hearing aids, relying on a report from Dr Howison of 12 June 2008. Dr Howison opined that Mr Westlake was exposed to considerable noise, seated in front of the brass section and he was not able to wear any ear protection”.
- The Respondent disputed liability:
- whether Mr Westlake could recover compensation: ss254 and 261 of the 1998 Act
- whether the claim had been duly made: sections 260 and 282 of the 1998 Act
- injury and the deemed date of injury for the purposes of section 17 of the 1987 Act and last noisy employer, and
- to the extent that any of the above were not notified, the Respondent sought for determination of those matters in accordance with section 289A(4) of the 1998 Act
The Arbitrator’s decision:
- An award was made for the Respondent.
- Mr Westlake had failed to comply with the statutory requirements concerning the giving of notice of injury and the making of a claim.
- Mr Westlake’s argument of “ignorance” of relevant matters was rejected.
Issues on appeal were whether the Arbitrator erred:
- in determining that the Appellant was debarred from recovery of compensation due to his failure to comply with the legislative requirements concerning time limitations as to the giving of notice of injury and notice of claim
- with respect to the manner in which relevant provisions of the 1998 Act applied to the facts as proven.
- with respect to her factual findings.
(1) It was not disputed that the alleged injury was deemed to have occurred on 17 March 1978 and it was agreed that the claim was made in July 2007. The provisions of sections 61 to 64 of the 1998 Act apply to Mr Westlake’s obligation to give notice of injury.
(2) Sections 260 and 261 regulate requirements as to the making of a claim stated as being made in July 2007 (applying Toll Pty Limited v Bartimote (2007) NSWWCCPD 153).
(3) The Arbitrator erred in determining that section 254 of the 1998 Act was the relevant provision to be applied .
(4) Notwithstanding the error noted above, the Arbitrator’s ultimate conclusions concerning Mr Westlake’s failure to comply with the notice provisions and her determination that such non-compliance should not, on the facts, be excused  were upheld.
(5) There was little direct evidence on the issue of prejudice. Correspondence between the Respondent and its Insurer, which was before the Commission did not address the question of the existence or otherwise of actual prejudice occasioned by delay in the giving of notice of injury and making a claim. Notwithstanding, it was clear that the mere effluxion of time, and the period exceeding three decades since the date of injury, formed a reasonable basis upon which a presumption of prejudice may be made (see discussion by McHugh J in Brisbane South Regional Health Authority v Taylor  HCA 25; 186 CLR 541). The likelihood was that the Respondent has been prejudiced by such delay and that Mr Westlake had not established entitlement to the benefit of the application of section 61(2)(a) of the 1998 Act .
(6) The concept of ‘ignorance’ was stated by Burke J in Gregson v L and Mr Dimasi Pty Ltd  20 NSWCCR 520 (‘Gregson’) at 61:
“61 The ignorance referred to is ignorance of the rights deriving from the Act and the obligations imposed by it. Effectively the court is required to be satisfied that the applicant was unaware of those rights and obligations and thus failed to make the requisite claim …”
(7) There was no evidence of any weight that addressed the question of Mr Westlake’s state of knowledge concerning his rights and obligations under the relevant compensation law at various times since 1978. The onus was on the Appellant, and such evidence was essential to enable a determination of his entitlement to be relieved, by reason of ignorance, from the obligation of compliance with the notice provisions. The Appellant failed to establish such entitlement .
(8) Appellant barred from recovery of compensation as claimed.
Video surveillance - weight of medical opinion
17 February 2009
- Mr Korunovic worked as a process worker for Stratco from about 1992. In 1998 he had a car accident driving to work. Stratco accepted liability and paid weekly compensation benefits and lump sum compensation under sections 66 and 67 in respect of injury to his neck, back, right leg and right arm.
- In 2002 and in July 2006 he made further claims including allegations that his neck, back, right arm and right leg were aggravated and also that he suffered injury to his left leg, left arm and both feet, due to the nature and conditions of employment from 2000 to date.
- On 27 October 2006 whilst at work, Mr Korunovic “tripped over offset and fell against machine”. He was taken by ambulance to Nepean Hospital, hospital notes indicating he complained of symptoms in the neck, thoracic back, lower back, left elbow, left flank and right knee. The history states he had suffered from chronic back and neck pain since the motor accident in 1998.
- Mr Korunovic was off work from 27 October 2006 until about mid-2007. He resumed work on restricted hours, which he found difficult complaining of aching in his back and neck, headaches and sharp pain in the left knee.
- Stratco made voluntary payments of compensation up to at least 24 June 2007, and perhaps beyond that date, for which they sought credit.
- On 14 September 2007 Stratco wrote to Mr Korunovic asserting that inconsistencies between his version of how he alleged he was injured on 27 October 2006, and CCTV footage of that incident, were such that he had “deliberately sought to mislead” Stratco and the insurer. This constituted serious and willful misconduct, and Mr Korunovic was dismissed on 12 October 2007.
- Surveillance on 1 August 2007, showed Mr Korunovic involved in the demolition of a fence and construction of a new one to replace it. Mr Korunovic said in a later statement that he tried to help out a friend in about August 2007, and again about six or eight weeks later but realised he could not do work of that nature as it was “too hard”.
- Mr Korunovic lodged an ARD in the Commission and at the arbitration on 15 September 2008, the allegations of injury were refined, without objection, to the following:
(i) injury to the neck, back and right knee resulting from the nature and conditions of employment between approximately April 1998 and 14 August 2006;
(ii) aggravation of injury to the neck, back and right knee resulting from the incident of 27 October 2006
(iii) development of pathology in the left knee resulting from the Worker favouring his left knee due to the injuries above.
The Arbitrator’s decision:
(1) The incident of 27 October 2006 did not result in injury.
(2) Mr Korunovic did suffer aggravated injuries as a result of the nature and conditions of his employment.
(3) The employer to pay (under section 40) $274.15 per week from 24 June 2007 to date and continuing with credit for payments already made.
(4) The lump sum claim was remitted to the Registrar for referral to an AMS for assessment of injury to the neck, back, right knee and left knee.
Issues on appeal:
The Appellant argued that the Arbitrator erred in failing to:
(i) consider the medical evidence;
(ii) consider whether Mr Korunovic was a credible witness;
(iii) properly consider the effect of a finding that injury did not occur in the incident of 27 October 2006, on Mr Korunovic’s credit, and
(iv) give adequate reasons.
(1) The CCTV footage of the incident on 27 October 2006 suggested Mr Korunovic was able largely to control his fall, and the level of trauma did not appear great. Considering both that footage, and the medical evidence, which dealt with the incident, the incident was a relatively trivial one and the evidence did not establish that any pathological change occurred .
(2) The Worker’s usual duties were strenuous, and involved heavy lifting, repeated bending, and long periods of standing. This finding was based on Mr Korunovic’s consistent histories about his strenuous activities (some of it pre-dating the allegations of injury in the incident of 27 October 2006), the partial corroboration of Mr Korunovic by Mr Berber (co-worker), and the absence of any convincing evidence to the contrary .
(3) The Arbitrator correctly approached the issue of ‘injury’ on the basis of the ‘disease’ provisions of the 1987 Act. Mr Korunovic suffered injury by way of continuing aggravation to the condition of his cervical spine, lumbar spine and right knee, resulting from the nature and conditions of his employment ,  and .
(4) The surveillance video demonstrated Mr Korunovic carrying out activities that were at marked variance with his complaints and presentation to a number of doctors. This was relevant to the weight to be attached to the doctors’ opinions regarding his capacity to work (see generally Makita (Australia) Pty Limited v Sprowles (2001) 52 NSWLR 705). The level of activity shown in the video was directly relevant to a determination of the Mr Korunovic’s ability to earn.
(5) The probable earnings were agreed at $824.15 per week. Considering the video and medical evidence overall, the worker was capable of significant physical work but probably not fit for heavy labouring work. Having regard to the matters set out in section 43A of the 1987 Act, jobs such as cleaning, security work, many forms of process work, or many stores jobs would be suitable, on a full time basis. The worker’s ability to earn in some suitable employment was $670.00 per week, resulting in a difference of $154.15 per week  and .
(6) The Arbitrator did not give adequate reasons on the issue of the worker’s credit ramifications of the video evidence, especially in circumstances where Stratco conducted its case on the basis the video impugned Mr Korunovic’s credit. However the failure to give adequate reasons on this issue did not affect the orders on this appeal  and .
Interlocutory appeal – AMS referral
20 February 2009
- Ms Moore was employed in a clerical capacity but her duties included periodically organising and setting up functions. On 16 September 2004 she injured her back while moving a very heavy pot plant in the course of a function set up.
- Ms Moore underwent a laminectomy, and fusion surgery. She subsequently resumed carrying out some duties for the Council on a computer from home.
- On 6 September 2007 Ms Moore made a claim on the Council for work injury damages. The Council’s insurer, denied liability, partly on the basis that it did not concede that Worker suffered from at least 15% WPI.
- Ms Moore also made a claim for lump sum compensation pursuant to section 66 and 67 of the 1987 Act. The Council’s insurer in a section 74 Notice, denied liability for the claim from the date of the Notice on the basis that Ms Moore had suffered only a “minor soft tissue injury or strain” in the incident on 16 September 2004 and any incapacity beyond a “few days” from the date of injury resulted from causes other than the work incident.
- Ms Moore filed an ARD on 2 June 2008 claiming lump sum compensation in respect of 22% WPI and pain and suffering.
- On 7 October 2008 the Arbitrator made the following findings:
- Ms Moore had suffered an injury on 16 September 2005 when moving the pot plant;
- prior to that injury Ms Moore suffered from a degenerative back condition including a disc protrusion at L4/5, and
- the ‘injury’ was a strain and did not involve further damage or rupture to the disc.
- The Arbitrator directed that the Registrar refer Ms Moore to an AMS, and that the AMS was to be provided with the findings and reasons, in addition to medical reports, for evaluation of WPI as a result of the injury of 16 September 2004.
Issues on appeal:
- Ms Moore appealed the decision relying on several grounds including:
- that the Arbitrator exceeded his jurisdiction (section 326 of the 1998 Act) in that, having made a formal finding of ‘injury’ he should have referred the matter to an AMS for assessment without embarking upon other findings (Haroun v Rail Corporation New South Wales & Ors  NSWCA 192 (‘Haroun’);
- Council argued on appeal inter alia that the orders made referring the matter for assessment by an AMS were interlocutory within the meaning of section 352(8), and accordingly section 352(1) did not grant a right of appeal.
- On the interlocutory issue, Ms Moore argued that the Arbitrator not only referred the matter to an AMS but also made specific findings of ‘injury’ that would severely limit the assessment by an AMS and that the ‘findings’ appealed against, determined the rights of the parties and were not ’interlocutory’.
(1) ADP Snell referred to P & O Ports Limited v Hawkins  NSWWCCPD 87 at  and after surveying the decided cases on interlocutory appeals and the relationship between Arbitrators and AMSs from  to  he drew some common features as set out in . He concluded that the Arbitrator’s orders on 7 October 2008 were interlocutory.
(2) The current matter was distinguished from Maricic v Medina Serviced Apartments Pty Limited  NSWWCCPD 196, in which there was a finding that the worker had not suffered certain injuries on which she relied because in the current matter the Arbitrator had made a formal finding on the only injury on which Ms Moore relied and then referred the issue of the impairment resulting from that injury to an AMS.
(3) The situation may have been different had the Arbitrator entered an award in the Council’s favour based on his Reasons .
(4) There is a line of Presidential decisions holding that decisions regarding injury, substantial contributing factor and causation are for the Commission to determine and that after the Commission determines such threshold questions, it is appropriate for a matter to be referred (if necessary) to an AMS for assessment pursuant to Chapter 7 Part 7 of the 1998 Act including: Jopa Pty Ltd (t/as Tricia’s Clip-n-Snip) v Edenden (2004) 5 DDCR 321, Issott v North Sydney Leagues Club (t/as Seagulls Club)  NSWWCCPD 38, Davies v Bisaxa Pty Ltd (t/as Sir Joseph Banks Nursing Home)  NSWWCCPD 103, Connor v Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of Sydney (2006) 5 DDCR 337 and Ooi v NEC Business Solutions Ltd (2006) 5 DDCR 461.
(5) These decisions predated the decision of the Court of Appeal in Haroun.
(6) Applying Haroun, ADP Snell noted that an AMS assessing the Worker and issuing a MAC would be at liberty to treat the Arbitrator’s findings as irrelevant, if the AMS independently came to a different conclusion. The findings of the Arbitrator in such circumstances could not finally dispose of the rights of the parties .
Leave to appeal was refused.
Factual evidence – failure to determine factual disputes - effect of voluntary payments - estoppel
Effect of voluntary payment of weekly compensation; whether such payments amount to an estoppel; section 274 of the 1998Act; weight to be given to an admission of liability; credit issues; relevance of worker’s criminal record; failure to determine factual issues in dispute; Clause 43 of the 2003 Regulations; admissibility of a MAC
26 February 2009
- Super Start is a family run wholesale supplier of batteries. It employed Mr Begnell through the Department of Corrective Services in 2001, initially as a storeman, and then promoted him to be the warehouse manager a few months later.
- There was no dispute that Mr Begnell had disc pathology in his low back nor that he was unfit for heavy work. However, how and where Mr Begnell injured his back was hotly disputed and the subject of conflicting evidence from several witnesses.
- According to Mr Begnell, his disc injury had been caused by regularly lifting heavy batteries in the course of his duties and as a result of lifting on 4 July 2003. Super Start alleged that Mr Begnell’s duties were supervisory and that he admitted to hurting his back at home on the morning of 4 July 2003 while picking up dog droppings.
- CGU initially accepted Mr Begnell’s claim and made voluntary compensation payments from a date in September 2003 until 14 February 2006, having declined liability by letter to Mr Begnell dated 2 February 2006.
The Arbitrator’s decision:
The Arbitrator found in favour of Super Start on the grounds that Mr Begnell had failed to discharge the onus of proof.
Issues on appeal:
Whether the Arbitrator erred in:
- Failing to find that the initial acceptance of liability and the making of voluntary payments of compensation amounted to an estoppel that prevented Super Start from denying liability;
- Finding that the MAC was a “forensic medical report” under Clause 43 and therefore inadmissible;
- His factual findings;
- Making no findings in respect of critical factual issues;
- Admitting Mr Begnell’s criminal record into evidence;
- Failing to make any determination as to the credit of key witnesses, and
- Drawing an adverse inference against Mr Begnell for failing to cross-examine witnesses.
(1) The mere acceptance of liability and payment of compensation until February 2006 amounted to no more than an admission to be assessed and weighed with all the other evidence in the case and did not prevent a later denial of liability. (Department of Education and Training v Sinclair  NSWCA 465; Nominal Defendant v Gabriel & anor  NSWCA 52) . This conclusion was not affected by the introduction of “provision liability” in section 274(2) in January 2002.
(2) The circumstances where an estoppel by representation might arise as a result of the voluntary payment of compensation were discussed at  to .
(3) Clause 43 does not apply to MACs (see Clause 47) and a MAC is not a “forensic medical report”  and .
(4) The Arbitrator incorrectly referred to Dr Bodel having been sent extra material by “the Applicant”, which was “not called in evidence by the Applicant.” As Super Start qualified Dr Bodel, it was not open to draw a Jones v Dunkel  HCA 8; (1959) 101 CLR 298) inference against Mr Begnell .
(5) The Arbitrator failed to discharge his duty to consider relevant evidence, weigh that evidence with conflicting evidence and determine which he accepted and which he rejected in reaching his conclusion. It was not open to conclude, without indicating if he accepted or rejected Mr Begnell’s medical and lay evidence, that Mr Begnell had not discharged the onus of proof .
(6) A worker’s criminal record will not normally be admissible in the Commission because it will rarely be relevant to the issues in dispute. However, the present case was exceptional as the case turned on the acceptance or rejection of Mr Begnell’s evidence and, therefore, his credit, and given that he had tendered evidence of his good (or reformed) character, evidence of his criminal record was admissible as it indicated he had been convicted of offences relating to honesty. Whilst such convictions impacted adversely on Mr Begnell’s credit, they were not determinative of the issues in dispute but required that his claim be carefully assessed and weighted against other evidence to determine its consistency and reliability  and .
(7) The Arbitrator did not adequately deal with the significant credit issues relating to several key witnesses or the issues in dispute generally. Merely referring to Mr Begnell’s submissions about certain credit issues relevant to Super Start’s witnesses did not deal with any of the critical issues in dispute, namely, the nature of Mr Begnell’s duties, whether those duties may have caused his injury, and whether the injury had been caused at home on the morning of 4 July 2003, as claimed by Super Start. To determine those issues the Arbitrator had to determine which of the conflicting statements he accepted and which he rejected. He failed to do that .
(8) In a case where neither party sought leave to cross-examine any of the many witnesses, the Arbitrator was not entitled to draw an adverse conclusion against one party from its the failure to cross-examine. The failure to cross-examine was a neutral factor that did not advance or diminish either party’s case. The Arbitrator erred in criticising Mr Begnell for his failure to cross-examine .
(9) The evidence from Mr Begnell’s GP, Liverpool Hospital, Dr Bodel, Dr Milder and two lay witnesses corroborated his claim and added an element of “consistency and reliability” (see point (4) above) to his case that made the acceptance of his evidence reasonable and appropriate notwithstanding the damage to his credit as a result of his past criminal conduct .
(10) Though it was not a specific ground of appeal, the Arbitrator also failed to rule on certain evidentiary objections by Super Start  and .
The Arbitrator’s decision was revoked and an award was made for Mr Begnell for section 40 payments at the statutory rate, which Super Start conceded was appropriate if he was otherwise entitled to an award.
Section 9A – expert evidence – ipse dixits
Substantial contributing factor; journey provisions; whether a worker in the course of employment can also be on a journey; expert evidence; Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles  NSWCA 305; (2001) 52 NSWLR 705
27 February 2009
- On 13 June 2004, Mr Cox, a police officer, was rostered as the “on call officer” for the Forensic Service Group Crime Scene Unit at Albury. He left his home at about 6am in the “on call police vehicle”. He alleged that he turned his head and reached for the police radio and as he did so, he coughed and experienced severe pain in his head, with weakness in the left side of his body. Only two days prior to this incident, Mr Cox had been off work due to a viral infection with a sore throat, headaches and repeated dry cough.
- The Police Force initially accepted the claim, but ultimately disputed liability on the basis that Mr Cox had not turned his head, or reached for the radio, at the time he coughed and felt pain and that, as a result, his employment was not a substantial contributing factor to his injury.
- At the arbitration, Counsel for Mr Cox conceded that his client was in the course of his employment at the time of the incident on 13 June 2004. As a result of that concession, the Arbitrator noted that section 10 did not apply. The Arbitrator identified the issue in dispute to be whether employment was a substantial contributing factor to the injury.
The Arbitrator’s decision:
The Arbitrator found in favour of Mr Cox on the basis that he had sustained a soft tissue injury to his neck with cervicogenic headaches and that employment was a substantial contributing factor to this injury, the incident having occurred as he had a coughing fit whilst bending to adjust the police car radio which was a task performed in the course of employment.
Issues on appeal:
The Police Force argued that the Arbitrator erred in finding employment to be a substantial contributing factor to the injury in circumstances where there was no evidence that Mr Cox turned his head as he coughed until several months after the incident.
Counsel for the worker argued that the Arbitrator’s decision was correct and that Mr Cox was also on a journey within the meaning of section 10 of the 1987 Act and that the requirement that employment be a substantial contributing factor did not apply to such a claim (section 9A(4) of the 1987 Act).
The appeal therefore turned on the following points:
- Did the Arbitrator err in finding employment to be a substantial contributing factor to the injury?
- Could it also be said Mr Cox was on a journey and therefore covered by section 10?
(1) Factual findings can be made notwithstanding the absence of contemporary evidence. Findings depend on an assessment of all the evidence .
(2) The histories recorded by Mr Cox’s treating doctors within days of the incident, which did not mention Mr Cox reaching down or turning his head at the time he coughed, were likely to be a more accurate account of what happened on 13 June 2004, than the histories recorded several months later. It was therefore found that Mr Cox had not reached for, bent towards, or turned his head towards the police radio when he coughed. There was therefore no factual basis for the conclusions reached by the Arbitrator .
(3) Mr Cox’s symptoms were caused by his viral infection and coughing and had nothing to do with his employment .
(4) The assumptions on which the opinions of Drs Bittar and Patrick were based, namely, the rotation of the head (Dr Bittar) and the lateral rotation of the neck to the left with flexion and lateral flexion (Dr Patrick), had not been proved and their opinions were of no weight (Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles  NSWCA 305; (2001) 52 NSWLR 705 (‘Makita’) at 731) . Moreover, Drs Bittar and Patrick did not have a history of Mr Cox’s symptoms caused by his viral infection leading up to 13 June 2004 nor of past unusual neurological symptoms in 1993 .
(5) In the alternative, even if the factual basis for the opinions of Drs Bittar and Patrick was established, the doctors did not explain how it was that coughing with the head turned or flexed while reaching for the radio caused or contributed to the injury. Their conclusions were no more than bare “ipse dixits” (Makita and South Western Sydney Area Health Service v Edmonds  NSWCA 16; (2007) 4 DDCR 421 at  and ) that were unsupported by any reasoning or analysis. The omission of such an analysis can sometimes be overcome by the use of “commonsense” in the evaluation of evidence and the “sequence of events” (Hevi Lift (PNG) Ltd v Etherington  NSWCA 42; (2005) 2 DDCR 271 (‘Hevi Lift’) at ) however, the incident on 13 June 2004 and its consequences were not within “the realm of common knowledge and experience” referred to by Mason J (with whom Barwick CJ and Gibbs J agreed) in Tubemakers of Australia Ltd v Fernandez (1976) 50 ALJR 720 at 724 (cited by McColl JA in Hevi Lift at ) that would enable an arbitrator or a Presidential member to rely on his or her “commonsense” to conclude that there was a connection between coughing while reaching, or coughing with the head turned or rotated, and the development of Mr Cox’s symptoms .
(6) In respect of the journey claim at the time of the incident, Mr Cox’s “place of employment” for the purposes of section 10 was the police car. Having arrived at his “place of employment”, he could no longer be on a journey within the terms of section 10 .
(7) If the point at  above was incorrect, and Mr Cox was on a journey, the claim still failed because his injury resulted from his “medical or other condition” (section 10(1D)), namely, his viral infection and coughing. The journey did not cause or contribute to the injury .
The Arbitrator’s decision was revoked and award was made for the Police Force.

domain: law


text:
Ghana defender, Mohammed Salisu, continues with his impressive form for Southampton in the 2021-22 season.
The former Real Valladolid defender is enjoying a good start to the season under manager Ralph Hasenhuttl.
The 22-year-old has become a top performer for The Saints in the 2021-22 campaign making seven appearances this season.
Mohammed Salisu and Manchester City defender Joao Cancelo are the only two players to have made more tackles and interceptions in the English Premier League so far this season.
Nigeria International Wilfred Ndidi (38) comes third on the list.
The Ghanaian defender has shown his strong athletism since adapting to the English game.
Mohammed Salisu registered his first-ever goal for Southampton against Sheffield United in the EFL Cup.

domain: news


text:
This is an interview with a researcher who attended a Flat Earth convention in Birmingham last week. It’s pretty damn interesting and infuriating to read about the attendees mistrust of not just scientists, but anyone who advocates for science that they disbelieve.
This part especially is interesting:
I know your aim in attending the event wasn’t to change the mind of flat Earthers. But if you were to decide that that is what you wanted to do, is there anything you learned at the convention that could inform about the best way of approaching the task?
Flat Earthers many times raised the point with physicists [who were not flat Earthers] that they were using huge measures of time and space. The flat Earthers said they would only believe it if they are able to see it or experience it. They put a lot of stock and a lot of value in what they could see and what they could observe by themselves. They want physical proof.
We have to approach them on a level of joint understanding. When we don’t agree on basic facts, it becomes very hard to find an entry point. The best way would be to show them something that proves the Earth is not flat. Unfortunately, I do not have the money to send each of them to space. But perhaps showing them a rocket launch might be a step in that direction. They were very skeptical of Elon Musk’s recent Falcon Heavy that put a car in space.
And this part:
What about if the physical proof is presented through the eyes of an observer such as an astronaut?
They are very skeptical. If you believe the Earth is flat, then there has to be some sort of conspiracy to keep that information out of public domain. The conspiracy then goes from the government to scientists, who use false data. For them, there is very little outside evidence that is not explicitly linked to people part of the conspiracy.


text:
Damn it, he was right. The sooner she started serving her sentence, the sooner it would end. She pressed ink to paper and signed away a month of her life. Q Very little had changed in the nine years since June graduated high school and left Sultry County. Wood signs contrasted against faded brick facades, clamoring for the attention of saints and sinners alike, all with one common business principle: in God we trust. All others pay cash. It had taken several years before June understood why he never wanted to play in the abandoned house.
A breeze stirred, and the familiar high, metallic tinkle of wind chimes sang out from above. Heaving a sigh, she set the carrier down and marched to the door with her shoulders firmly squared. Before she lost her nerve, she punched the doorbell and held her breath. Almost instantly, the front door swung open and Grammy Pru glowered from inside, wearing a long floral cotton dress and a scowl. Other grandmothers offered soft hugs and gathered little ones onto their plump laps for story time.
Other grandmothers smiled gently below rosy cheeks. They spoiled and cuddled, bragged and loved, smelled of cookies and hairspray. Armed with a prayer on her lips and a wooden spoon in her hand, Grammy ruled with an iron fist that would make Samson cower in fear. Let me get it. Once they were inside, Gram placed a hand on her hip and took a long, silent look at June.
Gram nodded approvingly and gestured toward the stairs. No griping, no rehashing their last argument. And that was fine by June. It felt like a lifetime ago. Her mama and daddy had laughed and sandwiched her into a hug. It was her favorite. Not now, anyway. Back when Luke still lived here, back before everything fell apart, things had been different. The sounds of laughter and clomping sneakers used to echo in the now silent home. She bit her lip and glanced into the hall. She slipped off her leather pumps and tiptoed down the hall to the last door, then opened it slowly and peeked inside. The same black comforter concealed his mattress, and aside from the pine desk in the corner, the room was empty.
Every single recruiting poster had been removed; every trace of the old Luke was gone. She padded to the desk, wincing when she stepped on a creaky floorboard, and quietly slid open the largest file drawer. Luke smiled at her from inside a simple black lacquer frame. He had his arm around a stunning Sultry with a Twist 21 young woman with tanned skin and cropped blonde hair. Was this his wife? The tips of his hair brushed his shirt collar, and they were reddish brown at the ends, the way his hair always looked at the end of summer. But he was somehow even more attractive now.
All grown up. And up. And good God, those dusty jeans, worn paper thin, practically plastered against his long, muscular legs. Gorgeous or not, Luke Gallagher was off limits. Every single one had been a gift from her. An unexpected warmth blossomed within her chest, and she shoved the shoebox back into the drawer before the warmth had a chance to grow. Off limits. One feeble bar flickered to life and then faded out.
Gram shook the biscuits into a wicker basket and covered them with a clean dish towel. May I use your phone? She already knew the answer. I need you to call me at this number right away. Four places. June opened the maple cabinet and pulled out four sets of dishes and salad bowls and began placing them atop the red and white checkered tablecloth. Her voice rose an octave.
With you? The sounds of bubbling beans and sizzling chicken filled the small kitchen. Then she turned around and pulled off her apron. But he stayed here awhile to get back on his feet. Gram lifted her wooden spoon from the pot and pointed it at June, and her thigh muscles clenched in response.
Or twenty. Ask him yourself. No reason to get worked up. Still, she heard the echo of her inner voice calling off limits, off limits. Distraction on the job was more dangerous than dry rot, and somehow he had to get her out of his head. He leaned back to tuck in his shirt and then joined Trey at the front door. With a smile already in place, he knocked twice and let himself in, but he stopped short on the other side, smile frozen on his face.
Grammy told me about you. What was she still doing here, and more importantly, why was God punishing him? I was beginning to wonder if you were real. His words probably hit too close to home. Trey leaned down and talked to the furball. She bent over and set the thing on the floor, and it pattered away, stepping forward with two front legs and then hopping along with a single hind leg. She cuddled it against her chest and smoothed her cheek over its head. I paid for his amputation and adopted him. I think that makes him lucky.
June set the cat down and they all headed to the kitchen. The air was hot and thick with steam and the walloping scents of fine, fine country cooking. She shook her head and tugged a lock of his hair. Now the roles were reversed. June was the outsider and Pru favored him. Half a grin curved his lips before he could stop it. Luke hurried and did the same for Pru, and they all held hands for grace. What the hell was up with that? June hesitated and her eyes darted to Pru. Then she set down her fork, took a slow drink of iced tea, and sat ramrod straight. She looked at Pru, not him, when she finally answered.
On Sixth Street. Lifting a buttered biscuit to her lips, June continued staring down her grandma, waiting for a reaction like a game of emotional chicken. Totally upscale, romantic, sexy. It took a long time to save enough money for my own place. It was as close as June would get if she wanted approval.
Luke knew his buddy would rather roll naked in a bed of pine cones than spend an hour in a stuffy bar like that. Luke shrugged, pretending like nothing had happened, and lifted his glass to June. But the bad news is pretty bad. Sweet Jesus, a month? It took a solid minute before he could concentrate again. He had it all planned out!
It kills me not to be there. I promise. Yep, exactly. She smoothed her tight black skirt, adjusted her silky blouse, and sat down, flashing an apologetic grin. God love her, Pru asked what they were probably all thinking. But enough about my problems. Then she glanced down and used her fork 32 Macy Beckett to make swirls in her mashed potatoes. Trey had nothing to feel guilty about.
Hell, if anything, Luke was to blame for what happened. Just that Miss Pru had a granddaughter. Then she gave him that look, wrinkling up her forehead and widening those big, brown eyes. Aw, shit. Why did women try so hard to take offense to every little thing? The incestuous implication made him shiver.
Then he came to live with Grammy and me when he was twelve. I assume he told you why. Is that close enough to the truth for you, Junebug? But Luke never told Trey about his little sister. Like he was inferior, not worth keeping. You three take it on the porch while I make a call. A cool night breeze rustled his hair and tickled the back of his neck. The air was sweet with honeysuckle, which brought back memories of other summer nights when he and June used to eat watermelon out here and spit seeds onto the front lawn. His always went farther, and one year a melon plant took root beneath the big pecan tree.
June curled up on the porch swing and tucked her feet underneath her. The moonlight glowed from behind, illuminating the curls of her hair, but leaving her face concealed in shadows. She looked like a dark angel, all soft curves and sensuality. I can work at the church or with some charity that fixes old homes. No thanks. What had he done to deserve this?
No scorpions or rabid raccoons in church. June bit the inside of her cheek and stared into the darkness. Then he grabbed one for himself and joined her on the swing without offering Luke a slice. Was she batting her lashes at Trey, or did she have something in her eye? It was pretty good. Luke fished his keys out of his pocket and skipped down the front porch steps toward the truck. Once he and Trey were on the road headed back to town, his buddy switched off the radio. Just forget about June. You two have a history. What happened? Some things a man just kept private.
They deliver the shingles? June squinted at the digital clock on the cracked gray dashboard. Another scorcher. June glanced out her window at a parched irrigation ditch running alongside an even more parched, withered cornfield. Esteban had phoned that morning, and aside from an argument with the building inspector, things were going more smoothly than either of them expected. Sultry with a Twist 39 A dull thunk sounded from the engine, and June eased up on the accelerator. Time to keep it below fifty. She read the directions Gram had written for her. Only one more mile until the Jenkins house.
June held her breath and tried to calm the nervous flutter inside her belly. What did she know about fixing things? She also hoped Luke had exaggerated about the critters. An old, white colonial came into view, its roof half stripped of shingles and baring the faded plywood underneath. A shirtless man straddled the roof peak, pulling off tar sheets and tossing them behind the house.
As June drove closer, she realized it was Trey. Taking a deep breath, June pulled Bruiser onto a shaded dirt path around the side. Folding her community service time sheet, she pressed it between her lips while stepping out of the car. Flashing a wide, brilliant smile, he strolled forward and pulled her into a crushing hug, the sour, smoky tang of marijuana practically emanating from his pores.
He eyed her up and down like she was a warm slice of cherry pie, or in his case, like she was an oversized bong with boobs. She tugged off her hat and rubbed her throbbing scalp. She could handle the sight of all bodily fluids, with the Sultry with a Twist 41 exception of blood. Or vomit. He busted his nose again. Then a vehicle started and drove away, flinging gravel in its wake.
From somewhere behind the house, the shrill buzz of a saw pierced the air, and she realized the drama was over. Everyone had already gone back to work. From there, her gaze lowered to the hard curves of his bare chest and those broad shoulders. Sweet mother of Stevie Ray. Off limits! In your first five minutes, you managed to send one of my men to the hospital.
Trey runs it for me. I founded it. And twice as ugly. Luke shook his head and pulled his cap back on. You break down, it might take half a day before someone else drives along and finds you.
Sultry Days of Blood and Angels
You already met Karl. At the pond? Not at all. The heat spread to other places too. Probably just her imagination. You hear me? Most of these guys need the experience. There were so many ways to do it. Her favorite option involved the use of a discarded toilet seat protruding from the temporary Dumpster out back.
June picked up another cracked shingle and tossed it in her black trash bag. And painful. She winced and massaged her lower back, stiff from hours of bending. Wanna try? Give me a hand with the ladder, will you? He looked like a stoned, bowlegged cowboy taking ten paces before a showdown at high noon. Between the two of them, they extended the heavy aluminum ladder 46 Macy Beckett and pushed it into position against the chipped siding near the roof.
When June reached the roof, she peeked at the ground, her hands automatically tightening against the top rung. Best not to look down. She focused on watching Trey nail a sheet of new, jet black shingles in place. A battered cowboy hat shaded his face, but his bare back glistened with sweat and had started to turn pink near the shoulders. Trey glanced up and smiled, then hammered one last nail in place before joining her.
It was kind of nice for a change. Trey glanced at the gutter and reached out to curl his fingers around it. Maybe at your place? He chewed his bottom lip and concentrated on pulling clumps of dark debris from the gutter. Did she have tar on her face? Food between her teeth? Trey leaned down to dislodge an old mud dobber nest inside the gutter, and then a loud metallic noise clanked from below and shook the ladder. It separated from the siding with a dry crack.
Trey toppled forward, panic flashing in his eyes as he lurched sideways, trying to steady himself. She reached out to grab his arm, but the sweaty flesh slipped from her fingers, and he went down, feet first. But she recalled running outside and identifying the only person she knew besides Karl. When the ambulance finally arrived, the paramedics let her ride in the back with Trey, and she held his hand the whole ride, apologizing over and over. She waved from her seat in the waiting area to get his attention.
The front of his shirt was slick with sweat, the hollow of his throat pulsing visibly beneath tanned skin. June handed him her Coke. But what happened? June soon understood why. He looked like death warmed over, cooled back down, and then steamrollered. Just a couple cracked ribs and a broken femur. We were both holding on to the gutter when it broke, and I lost my balance. How am I supposed to get my house on the market in time?
I can still supervise the crew from a chair. Come on. Suddenly, she ached for home so badly she almost doubled over, but not wanting to upset Luke any further, she nodded and followed him to his truck. Instead, June rested her forehead against the window and stared outside, seeing nothing but a green and brown blur of landscape. Sultry with a Twist 51 When they reached the Jenkins house, Luke waited to be sure her car started.
Then he stalked away into the back yard. A minute later, she saw him on the roof hammering shingles. June bit her lip and rested her forehead on the steering wheel. Hot tears pressed against her eyelids, but she forced them back. He heard the toilet flush in the hallway bathroom and figured June was up too. The reason behind the dream was obvious. A heavy fog had settled inside his chest ever since. He pulled on his jeans and followed the scent of Sultry with a Twist 53 coffee into the kitchen.
Pru was already working on breakfast, dressed in one of those flowery grandma ensembles. She pressed a steaming mug into his hand. Eyes all puffy. Hard, but soft at the same time. Maybe even sad. In his bare feet, Luke strolled through the cool, damp grass to the garden on the side of the house. Clouds drifted across the sun, and the crisp morning air puckered the skin on his chest into gooseflesh. Then he saw her, and all the oxygen in his lungs vanished. In her long, white nightgown, June looked mystical, like one of those faeries his mama had told him about.
When he approached and cleared his throat, she sucked in a startled breath and dropped everything. She frowned at the scattered peppers. That same Luke is sorry. He knew he should look away, but hell, he was only a man, and she was even more spectacular than he remembered. Sweet Jesus.
- Faith Lehane.
- Judas Kane # 1 (Gun for Hire.
- Performing the Sacred (Engaging Culture): Theology and Theatre in Dialogue.
- Love Narratively? So do we..
- Authentically Catherine--Book 7: All About God?
She gasped, digging her fingernails into the skin on his shoulders. Christ, she smelled delicious, like oranges and cloves, and he could feel her heartbeat through her gown. The soft curves of her breasts, her hot breath panting against his chest, her silky hair tickling his jaw, all the dizzying sensations scrambled his brain into oatmeal. He lowered his lips to her ear and tried to form a coherent sentence.
He cleared his throat and gently pushed her away. God help him, he was hard enough to crack granite. Esteban had done that too. Nothing got between Luke Gallagher and a hearty meal. Luke lifted his hips and scooted forward, and June felt a rush of heat pool between her thighs, remembering how those hips had pressed against her in the garden. Maybe working at church away from him was a good idea after all.
Luke appeared holding something black and greasy. How am I supposed to get around? He drained the whole glass and wiped his mouth on the back of his arm. I need to get a few parts before you can drive that heap again. He reached for the biscuit and his fingertips brushed the inside of her wrist, sending a thrill up the length of her arm. But I wound up working on helicopters when they sent me overseas. It was easy: panic with a dash of stress. This might be my last chance to get it back. If she tipped her head a teeny bit, she could rest against his shoulder.
Instead, she leaned forward and wrapped her arms around her knees. He fidgeted with his own hands, pressing a thumb inside the opposite palm. But he died before the paperwork went through, and everything passed to Mama. Something closer to Sultry with a Twist 59 the pond so I can sit on the front porch with my coffee and look at the water. It had taken nine months and three price reductions before her condo sold.
And fast. So anyway, all I gotta do is finish it up, list it, and let the bidding begin.
zopusalawyky.ga: sultry days of blood and angels by tess nottebohm paperback
Now, can I ask you something? June had never felt entitled to a free education. Not fear of Grammy, but of the disappointment and loathing in her voice. And each year that went by, it got harder to call. She glanced away and swallowed hard. Luke intended to spend his days laboring there before driving an hour and working all night on his investment property? Chapter 6 About fifteen years ago, an argument over whether or not Jazzercise counted as sinful dancing broke out among the Sultry Springs churchgoers, and a few disgruntled members marched their legwarmers over to a new house of worship: Holy Baptism by Water.
The rift had rocked the county, pitting brother against brother, much like the Civil War but far more serious. The Sultry Springs Holy War raged on for six months until the Jazzercise instructor ran off to Vegas with her boyfriend. Then, with their heads hung in defeat, the defectors returned home and rejoined the flock. Nowadays, if a person wanted his soul saved, there was only one option: Holy Baptism by Hellfire. June brushed her fingertips against the shiny oak pew, polished to a high gloss by hundreds of bottoms and decades of use.
Otherwise, nothing had changed. The air inside the church still smelled like dusty silk flowers and arthritis ointment. Apparently, June was a celebrity now. Bicknocker straightened her spine and peered down her long nose. Now she looked just as constipated as everyone else. Bicknocker shook her head disapprovingly. Tough crowd. June decided this was the perfect moment to excuse herself.
And come inside if you get too hot. That glass of iced tea sounded awfully good, but she had too much pride to take a break before actually doing anything. After filling the gas tank, June primed the motor and yanked the start cord a few times, until the engine turned over and rumbled to life. She started near the building and worked her way out, mowing in meticulous, straight lines. An hour later, she stood back and admired her work and then rewarded herself with two tall glasses of tea.
It was dull, monotonous work, so she let her mind wander, imagining opening night at Luquos. But while June tried to decide which outfit to wear, her thoughts drifted to Luke. What was he doing right now? Did he think about her? That person had always been her. But perhaps that was a blessing. She rubbed the side of her sneaker against her leg, but the prickle intensified until it felt like her skin was on fire. A stinging, swarming cloud of yellow and black covered her calves and ankles. They crawled in frantic zigzag patterns higher up the length of her body while some took flight and prepared to attack her face.
She had to get them off, and fast. She was still yelling when she threw open the door and dashed inside. Get the hose. Within seconds, the air was practically impossible to breathe as Gram fogged the fellowship hall with thick, acrid insecticide. Coughing hard enough to hack up a Sultry with a Twist 67 lung, June bent over and braced her hands against her knees. Even Ms. Bicknocker joined in, flicking a dishtowel with the skill of a seasoned locker room jock. Call Doc Noble. Bicknocker said over the top of her bifocals. It really hurts. If anything, it mounted with each passing second.
June grasped the cool edge of her plastic chair and held her breath. She agreed, unable to think of a single excuse not to, and asked for indoor community service hours until her legs healed. Back home, Grammy made June lie in bed with three pillows under her knees. Like a child at bedtime, she grinned in anticipation of the rare morsel to come. She was eat up with welts.
Nobody messed with his little girl, not even Mother Nature. Ever the stoic, Grammy made a noncommittal grunt and tucked the ribbon back into her pocket. She smoothed an imaginary stray hair back into her bun and changed the subject. Gram smiled once again, sending creases and deep folds in motion over the tops of her cheekbones. Was that you? He never needed one from me. Told him to come back home anytime he pleased. June cleared her throat.
What could I do? She probably knew June had fantasized for years about marrying Luke and raising their children together on this farm. For Gram to attend his wedding to someone else seemed like an act of betrayal. You had a boyfriend? Finally, she lowered her head just a fraction Sultry with a Twist 71 and gave June a solemn look. Think on that. June stared into the empty hall.
Teach him to love? Luke knew how to love other women, just not her. But now, as he crossed the threshold into Sultry County Memorial Hospital, he held his breath once again.
Luke hated hospitals. Nothing good happened within these walls. Hell, at that very moment, a dozen people were probably dying all around him. But true, all the same. As he approached the elevators, he slowed his pace, Sultry with a Twist 73 allowing a group of visitors to file inside and head off to their destinations. Hundreds of people pushed that switch every hour, and he knew it was crawling with flu viruses, or worse. When Luke stepped onto the fourth floor, he immediately flinched back.
The odor of bleach and vomit slammed his nostrils with the force of a freight train. After one quick knock that sounded more like a body slam, he tugged open the door and bolted inside. She glanced down and picked a bit of lint off her 74 Macy Beckett designer blouse, then smoothed a set of nonexistent wrinkles from her tan slacks. Luke stood from his seat. For the love of God, it had been five years. How much Sultry with a Twist 75 longer was the sanctimonious fucker going to punish his only son? Trey exhaled, puffing out his cheeks. Though his left eye was barely visible beneath its swollen lid, the expression behind it seemed clearer than yesterday.
Alert and teasing, just like the old Trey. Broken bones were painful, but nothing made a man feel lower than losing the ability to take care of his own personal needs. Bet your nurse loves to get you reeeal clean.
- Resurrection of New Orleans.
- Sultry ZHU and Sinister i_o Take First at Paradiso 12222 | Recap;
- You Deserve Love : Is He Right For You??
- Start Here!
Nothing but junk. Those carnations over there match the wine stains on my sofa. It better not involve bedpans. You practically tore her a new one the other day. Did I strike a nerve? I can tell something happened. You never tell me anything. I think you grew a vadge, my friend. Then eat me. Or you want some of that shit with wings?
Very funny. A pretty, young redhead balanced a plastic tray in one hand, gripped a cup of juice in the other, and pushed the door Sultry with a Twist 79 aside with her hip. Waving a quick goodbye, the redhead left and pulled the door shut behind her. So back off, man. Maybe even a slice of pecan pie. Take a rest. You look like shit, no offense. Get some sleep. Cleanliness is nexta godliness. With one hand on the doorjamb, he leaned his head and shoulders inside and found her resting in bed, reading a Better Homes and Gardens magazine.
For free. Leave them in a pile outside the bathroom. You gonna try to sneak a look? While in the shower, his mind conjured naughty images of June. He needed to finish this repair and get the hell out of here before he died of chronic blue balls. How did they manage to survive? Nobody ever told you this? Did other women smell this good? Had he simply failed to notice all these years? This could save your engine. He shoved the dipstick back into place and wiped his greasy fingers on the rag.
He crawled forward with a grin tugging his lips. Probably not a good idea to say plenty of cushion on that big, gorgeous ass. Scenes from the shower Sultry with a Twist 85 flashed in his mind, tying his stomach in knots, but those sexy mental pictures died awfully quick as her imaginary, silken skin was replaced by oozing, scarlet blotches. Happens to people all the time. Only June could find trouble in a churchyard. She snatched a fallen pecan from the ground and hurtled it at his boot.
This explains the Amish dress. He halted his hand. Not really. Gotta finish tearing out the old cabinets before they deliver the new ones. His shoulders tensed, and a heavy weight settled around his ribs. The new doors would arrive soon, right along with the cabinets, which meant pulling off the old Sultry with a Twist 87 doors, unscrewing all the hinges, filling the holes, and prepping them for new hardware.
June helped him clean up, tossing a screwdriver into his toolbox. And your time. Replacing the fan and all those belts had lifted an invisible burden from his back. Come lie down. June was a terrible liar. And quit fretting. When a yawn threatened to 88 Macy Beckett stretch his lungs, he stifled it, knowing June was still watching him. Pulling out onto the main road, he switched on the radio, smiling when the perfect song filled the cab.
The early morning light streamed in from the side office window and lit up what remained of his bushy, mad scientist hair. And the feel of the cool, dewy grass beneath her bare feet first thing in the morning when she gathered fresh tomatoes. The judge leaned over his desk and glanced at her time sheet. He gave a slow, cautious nod. They spent their evenings rocking on the front porch, sometimes shelling beans or pecans, and sometimes just eating melon and listening to the wind chimes. Even Lucky had warmed up to Gram. You mind if I apply?
That oughta bring enough tips to tide you over.
- Kittens & Cats: A Collection of Cute Kitten and Cuddly Cat Photos (Adorable Animals)?
- Bethlehems Treasure.
- Sultry Days of Blood and Angels - AbeBooks - Tess Nottebohm: ;
- Sexualitat i amor cristià (Catalan Edition)?
- Gulping Miles of Air & Seeing Forever: A Search for Meaning in the College Years, 1964-67 (Young in the Sixties Book 3).
- Johannes Kepler : The Laws of Planetary Motion (A Short Biography for Children)!
- Justice for Hedgehogs.
But June had a plan. She intended to storm the Jenkins place, deliver her presentation, and if necessary, refuse to leave until Luke agreed. June knew she could lighten the load on his shoulders. She just needed to make the stubborn fool see it. I forgot about that. You can help him.
Maybe then he could catch a few winks in the shade when his crew left for the local diner. He tossed the empty soda can into the recycling bin and winced in pain. Damn it, his shoulder hurt like the devil. He wedged a crowbar between two wood planks and levered it back with a grunt, which sent invisible flames lapping at his muscles. Even that jackass Karl stayed on task and kept his head down. Maybe he should hurt himself more often. Luke used his good arm to lift his shirt and wipe the sweat from his eyes.
The sun beat down like a sledgehammer against the back of his neck, and he wondered when this damn heat would let up. Then all of a sudden the crack and creak of boards being pried off the deck was replaced by cat calls and wolf whistles. When Luke turned, he saw what had brought his workers Sultry with a Twist 93 to a dead halt. It was June, and she looked better than a chocolate ice cream cone in hell.
A double scoop. He told the men to get back to work and led June through the side door into the house. She was up to something. It was full of paint colors, pictures of model homes and flower beds, and information on girly stuff like furniture and interior design. And lawn care and landscaping? Now his neck was feeling stiff. Just pulled it last night. Luke laughed dryly and gave her a teasing grin before she disappeared behind him. She moved a little too slowly, sweeping her fingertips over his ribs, and his pulse quickened a beat or two.
Or fifty. Her palm skimmed lightly across the skin on his shoulder. Actually, he could. But this was a close second. Though still tender, the pain in his shoulder nearly evaporated. First guy I ever lived with. He taught me all his tricks. Tsk, tsk. Or warming her bed at night. She laughed and leaned down to use her elbow for more pressure.
Yes, it was really bad. Big mistake. There never had been. How would Pru have reacted to learn his marriage was over in four weeks? Bigger mistake. Almost overnight, Ada had changed. Those magical fingers curled over his shoulders to massage the top of his chest in small circles. He wanted her to keep going lower, to feel her firm touch all over. And when she did go lower, ghosting her palms over his nipples, he sucked in a sharp breath.
Then she leaned down until he felt the soft cushion of her breasts against his shoulders, and she pressed her lips to his ear. His blood turned hot and rushed right between his legs. As she stepped slowly around to face him, she let her fingernails trail along the side of his neck and down the front of his chest. When Luke opened his eyes, she was bent over gazing right into his face. Would the guys outside see if he laid her on the table and pushed up her skirt?
Would she let him? Chapter 9 June never understood why so many people hated hospitals. She adored the gleaming black and white floor tiles that squeaked beneath her sneakers. And the biting, yet oddly pleasant scent of lemon ammonia and disinfectant. She pulled in a long breath through her nose and savored it. More than anything, though, June equated hospitals with tender, loving care.
Someplace you could arrive broken and return home whole. When June was nine and Luke had accidentally knocked her out of the tall pecan tree, Grammy had rushed her to this very emergency room. A sturdy white brace had replaced all the bandages that bound his chest, and the swelling above his left eye had smoothed out and turned the color of a ripe eggplant.
She was a hosebeast. Partly, anyway. He glared at his lap and brushed cookie crumbs onto the floor. I swear to God, June, being a soldier was like a calling to him or something. He shook his head. And how was Trey involved? June was more determined than ever to help Luke finish his investment property. Vacant window boxes contrasted against the clean, white stucco and begged to be filled with colorful pansies. The exposed dark wood beams gave the structure an historic European feel. Gently rolling green hills filled the landscape as far as she could see.
She thought she heard the babble of a creek nearby. No wonder he already had several families interested. The last owner had five dogs, seven cats, and somehow a rodent problem. Like, past tense? Of course I got rid of the vermin. Instead of wayward animals, the home smelled like fresh pine dust and plaster. Luke had removed a few walls to open the floor plan, and he was halfway through renovating the kitchen. In the upcoming weeks, they would need to refinish the wood floors, lay new carpet, paint the bedrooms, tile the bathrooms, and landscape the yard. A tall order, but doable if they worked hard.
Finally, they stopped in the master bedroom, the cleanest space in the house. June pictured Luke snoring there, sleeping on his stomach with his mouth partly open and one arm reaching out to the side like the bronze man atop the Heisman trophy. Afterward, she vacuumed and mopped the wood floors underneath, and wiped down the walls to prep them for painting. When she met Luke in the kitchen, her face felt flushed and swollen, and a plump bead of sweat tickled its way down her back. The abrupt chill swept the sides of her neck and gave her goose bumps. His other hand lingered at her waist a moment while he enjoyed the cool air, and June wondered what he would do if she leaned her head back against his chest.
Just as she began to cover his hand with her own, he moved away. Then, tugging off his cap, he dipped his head under the faucet and sighed loudly, using one hand to splash water onto the back of his neck. When he finished, Luke shook his head like a wet dog and rejoined her. No, strike that. It was a whole wish, not half. Sweet mercy, she needed to get her mind out of the gutter.
June glanced down at her plate and something caught her eye. For those of us who never quite grasped the tragic depth of Hurricane Katrinas inundation of New Orleans, Tess Nottebohms new novel, Sultry Days of Blood and Angels, is a prose poem reminding us how fragile, beautiful, tragic, erotic and utterly sui generis was and is the Crescent City. Sultry Days is confected from the bitter-sweet urban archeology of a place that for three-hundred years has lived a few frightening meters of water away from extinction and lived, therefore, that much closer to the edge.
It is that rich boundary teeming with life, sex, voodoo and death and the inescapable tie to Creole customs and cuisine that is an irreducible part of the richness of 19th Century New Orleans so convincingly captured and elegantly served up in Tess Nottebohms Sultry Days of Blood and Angels. The threadbare pages of an old man's antique journal burst with a Pandora's Box of deep-bayou intriguespurring a modern young adventuress to seek her own destiny through the journal's account of three wildly compelling female characters.
Author Tess Nottebohm brings to vibrant life the mansions and back roads of old New Orleans with exhilaration and gutsy sensuality. Each bodice-ripping, mind-bending escapade is injected with a raw, unconventional twist on relationships, self-awareness, and the elusive nature of time itself. Nottebohm's satisfied readers will end up scouring flea markets everywhere for lace cravats, muslin bloomers, and dusty Cajun talismans!
Under its powerful seduction, and through a chance encounter with a book merchant, she follows clues that lead her to an abandoned cabin in the bayou, where she finds the journal of a fabled recluse, Wellsworth Worthington.

domain: literature