text:
In discussions of religion in modern society, commentators of all political persuasions often share a common assumption that Americans are generally more religious than their European counterparts, indeed more religious than any other people in the industrialized world. This assumption is apparently substantiated by surveys showing a higher percentage of Americans professing belief in a God who answers prayer, in the special creation of the universe, and other putative benchmarks of religious belief. The vast majority of Americans still identify themselves as Christians, and tens of millions of these regard themselves as “evangelical” or “born-again” or “charismatic,” giving the misleading impression that the United States is a veritable bulwark of Christianity against modern secularism, much to the chagrin of secular liberals and the praise of conservatives.
This picture of religion in the United States is fundamentally flawed, and does not adequately take into account those qualities of American religion which depart radically from traditional Christianity and other ancient concepts of religion. When we consider these heterodox qualities in full detail, we can only conclude with Harold Bloom that, “Most religious Americans are not Christians in any traditional sense.” There are several aspects of mainstream American religion that are fundamentally incompatible with historic Christianity or any other traditional form of religion. As a derivative of its pietistic origins, American religion has reduced the locus of divine activity into the domain of human emotion, resulting in a subjectivist, pseudo-psychological, fideistic belief system that is divorced from the historical claims of the Scriptures and the Church, as well as from external rituals and hierarchical authority. This tendency goes beyond even the most extreme sects of the Reformation era, as the psychotherapeutic aspects of religion have assumed an importance previously reserved for the revelation in Scripture. This emphasis on the therapeutic aspects of religion effectively inverts the basic order of religious worship, as now God serves man instead of man serving God. In order to reconcile the new theology with the Bible, most mainstream Christians have adopted an essentially Gnostic approach to the New Testament, claiming to have found a secret meaning of the Gospel that somehow eluded the Christian church for most of its history. Even the more "conservative" Christians have little qualms about retrojecting modern notions of democracy, social egalitarianism, and feminism into a first-century document.
We will find that the tendencies just described are rooted not only in Protestant pietism and its philosophical offshoots, but also in the political culture of the United States, which was the first nation in Christendom to emphatically exclude the Christian religion from the constitution of its form of government. The anti-establishment clause of the First Amendment is so firmly entrenched in the American civic religion, that to oppose it would be considered an unpatriotic act. This has forced the ancient churches to suppress or even amend their teachings on the relationship between church and state, in order to conform to the First Amendment principles which Americans believe to be among their greatest contributions to civilization. The problem is particularly acute in the case of the Catholic religion, whose pontiffs have repeatedly condemned the American idea of church-state separation.
In the last half-century, all of the above-mentioned problems have become accentuated due to a radicalization of American individualism extending to all moral and social concerns. Religion, like almost everything else in modern America, is understood in terms of personal choice. Since a religion needs only to be helpful to people in their individual concerns, it does not necessarily have to explain the cosmos, so it need not be true for everyone. The extension of individualism has also radicalized interpretations of the First Amendment. The Constitution is now generally understood to require a "separation of church and state", interpreted in a way that forbids any civic manifestation of religion even in its most generalized form.
In sum, the mainstream American concept of Christianity, and religion in general, is circumscribed by deistic, pietistic, and consumeristic ideas that are arguably every bit as subversive of traditional religion as open atheism. It is therefore a calamitous mistake for social conservatives to advocate the American model as the world's best hope for Christianity, when the “Christianity” professed is of such dubious authenticity. This advocacy can be especially ruinous when well-meaning “conservative” American Christians, ignorant of historic Christianity, attempt to “correct” the pious practices of traditional Christians from other cultures, and impose on them the bastardized American form of Christianity as though it were the more authentic form. In such instances, American hubris dovetails with evangelical zeal to produce disastrous results.
In any treatment of a social phenomenon, it is often necessary to paint with broad strokes. Naturally, there are still many Americans who adhere to Christianity in one of its historic manifestations, and even among those who do not, there are many who seek historic Christianity but fail to find it, due to innocent ignorance or cultural influences. For the latter, this discussion may help sharpen their thinking, and appreciate a clearer distinction between the kingdom of God and the kingdom of man which is preached by far too many pseudo-Christians.
Several important aspects of American Christianity can be traced to seventeenth-century England. As the Catholic religion was violently suppressed by the monarchy, an increasingly Protestantized culture eliminated nearly all loci of the supernatural save God Himself, as beliefs in the apparitions of saints, angels, and demons, as well as the effects of sacraments and other rituals, were harshly derided as papist superstition and priestcraft. In a significant departure from continental Protestantism, English theology, following Berkeley, came to focus on the act of belief rather than God in history. Arguments for the existence of God followed the stoic philosophers instead of Aquinas, using the argument from design, which relied on subjective perception instead of objective metaphysics. English religion became grounded in subjectivity, rather than objective historical or philosophical claims. This was a dangerous approach, as it made no appeal to the continuity between generations responsible for the perpetuation of a common sense of duty, truth and goodness.
At the end of the seventeenth century, a more intensely subjectivist form of Christianity known as “pietism” arose in Germany, when Lutheran preacher Philipp Jakob Spener (1635-1705) proclaimed a radically antidogmatic and antiecclesiastical Christianity, which was condemned by Lutheran churches. Spener's emphasis on the “attitude” and religious “sentiment” of Christians as more important than any formula for belief or ecclesiastical organization was foreign to any major form of Christianity that had hitherto existed. Here was born the familiar American evangelical idea that Christianity is essentially and primarily a “relationship,” not a "religion," and that this relationship is more important than dogmatic orthodoxy or ecclesiastical obedience or ritual orthopraxis. Intellectually barren pietism did not succeed in Germany, but one of its offshoots, quakerism, found fertile soil in the United States. Pietism also found favor among some of the eighteenth-century English, in the form of Wesley's Methodism, which focused on emotional responses as proofs of spirituality, so that the educated classes regarded Methodists as fanatics. Methodist fervor was famously satirized in Wuthering Heights in the character of the Rev. Jabes Branderham, though we can see that Methodists still had a strong belief in objective norms of behavior, their professed anti-dogmatism notwithstanding.
The widely influential German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), raised in a Pietist household, turned religion completely inward toward the realm of human subjectivity, appealing to man's supposedly innate capacity to sense the Infinite. His thought has had a profound effect on religion in the English-speaking world, which has largely retreated into fideism and abandoned the project of expounding the objective reality of religious truths. Most have adopted Kant's belief that religious feeling and ethics are more important than cosmological explanations and ritual. Kant was so convinced that the human mind was the only locus of the divine on earth, that he would not enter a Catholic church, because he was convinced that the Sacrament was the one place where God was not. Ironically, many American Catholics, while assenting to the Real Presence, nevertheless espouse a Kantian form of religion that, carried to its logical conclusion, would restrict divine action to the human soul.
The theology of Friedrich Schleiermacher (1768-1834) went a step beyond Kant, and removed religion even from the moral sphere. For Schleiermacher, 'essential religion' consisted not in ethical norms, but in a mystical contemplation beyond analysis. In Schleiermacher's cosmology, morality pertained to the practical sphere of man's life, while the contemplative life was ruled by science, leaving only the domain of emotion and feeling for the religious. This fideistic capitulation to the pretensions of atheistic philosophers relegated religion to an anti-intellectual ghetto, where piety is nothing more than consciousness of one's dependence on God, or being in relation to God. According to Schleiermacher, the superiority of Christianity with respect to other religions consisted simply in its greater emphasis on man's absolute dependence on God. His theology has had far-reaching influence among English-speaking Christians, even penetrating Catholicism in the late twentieth century.
Schleiermacher's concept of religion discreetly makes God the servant of man, serving the function of fulfilling man's emotional needs. This sort of religion is precisely the opiate that Marx said it was. The philosopher Ludwig Feuerbach (1804-1872) took this theology to its logical conclusion, “God is essentially a being who fulfills man's desires,” in particular the desire not to die. Feuerbach, effectively an atheist, considered nature to be the first object of religion, and that the mastery of nature caused the replacement of pagan gods with monotheism.
While few Anglophone Christians would extend their theology to the extreme of Feuerbach, mainstream Christianity in North America and Britain carries tendencies in this direction. Reducing God to a means of fulfilling man's desires, the new Christianity is essentially paganism with the benefit of personal immortality. This sort of religion was ridiculed by Kierkegaard as 'tweaking God's nose', living as self-indulgently as any pagan, yet looking forward to the additional reward of Christian immortality. This desire to have your cake and eat it too dominates contemporary American religion, which is permeated with the expectation that God will pardon even those who not repent of their self-indulgent ways. It is only natural, therefore, that many more Americans believe in heaven than in hell. Those who believe only in heaven are essentially agnostics who fear death, and Feuerbach's critique describes their religion accurately.
Since the founding of the United States, the nation's cultural development has been heavily informed by the bourgeois ethics of liberal capitalism, a system of political economy developed in direct opposition to traditional Christian institutions. Ironically, the most "conservative" elements in the United States tend to advocate liberal capitalism most strenuously, so that American conservatism founders on an internal contradiction. The same people who strive to preserve traditional culture, society, religion, and ethics also advocate the most culturally corrosive agent in existence. Liberal capitalism, the belief that human relations should be primarily defined by market relations, has done more to destroy traditional religion than any dictatorship. The Christian in the United States faces an extraordinary challenge, since in his country the ethics of capitalism is practically taken for granted.
Economic liberalism first developed among the Protestant nations, particularly England, where the monarchy was especially weak. The liberals, or Whigs, were opposed by aristocratic interests who sought to control commerce through corporations possessing privileges from the state. The American Revolution essentially represented a triumph of Whig politics in the American continent. This was reflected by the complete abolition of corporations, trade guilds, and aristocratic titles or privileges. By dismantling traditional means of regulating the economy, the way was opened to allow market relations to dominate society. Prior to the eighteenth century, the regulation of prices and wages to an amount that was "just" was a universal phenomenon. With the feudal system dismantled, a new form of coercion developed through unbridled competition.
In the United States, laissez faire capitalism did not reach its full potential until the last half of the nineteenth century. During the Civil War era, most of the Revolutionary-era prohibitions against corporate entities were abolished, enabling the creation of a new privileged class which entrenched itself through the ruthless logic of the markets. This was the era of classical liberalism, when economists unashamedly asserted that a bare subsistence wage was the "natural wage" for unskilled labor, and large market shares allowed massive corporations to drive competition out of business. Entire towns were built by companies for their workers, who spent their meager wages at company stores. This neo-feudal culture lasted until the trusts were broken up at the turn of the century.
The end of the robber baron era did not put an end to its cultural legacy. To this day, many of its giants are remembered as philanthropists. The legends of these millionaires rising out of poverty have evolved into the modern myth that all wealth is rightfully earned. More importantly, the close relationship between the government and the business community that developed during this era remained long after the trusts had been abolished. This corporativist political system has successfully retarded the development of workers' rights compared with the rest of the industrialized world. Although American workers have far fewer rights than their foreign counterparts, they are much less likely to protest or strike, and, on the contrary, more likely to defend the capitalist system in its present form.
The ultra-capitalist culture of the United States renders non-economic forms of social organization less relevant, and tends to reduce social relations to self-interest. This facilitates what Christopher Lasch called a "culture of narcissism," a society that lives for the moment and for itself, not its predecessors nor posterity. This erodes any sense of continuity with the past, resulting in a breathtaking ignorance of one's own history and culture, and even the values of one's immediate ancestors. In terms of cultural amnesia, we are in many respects more primitive than the most barbarous cultures. Catholics have little inkling about Catholicism of only fifty years ago; the same is true for other subcultures. Even when confronted with the facts of recent history, people of this culture will reject them as irrelevant or outmoded; all that matters is here and now. If a distinctive characteristic of man is his ability to act in the present while considering the experience of the remote past and the consequences of the remote future, it must be admitted that our temporal horizon is collapsing to ever shorter intervals, converging to an almost ape-like consciousness. This forgetfulness of even the immediate past currently passes for enlightenment.
Liberal capitalism, considered as an ideology, and not mere relations of production, is subversive of Christianity in its detachment from social justice, its ethics of self-interest, its inherent subjectivism, its focus on the temporal present, and its utilitarian view of humanity and all social norms. When market relations are the dominant social relations, all values are negotiable. The Catholic will note that the liberal capitalist ideology was soundly condemned on doctrinal and rational grounds by the papal encyclicals Rerum Novarum (1891), Quadragesimo Anno (1931), and Centesimus Annus (1991).
In the United States, the capitalist religion is not effectively challenged by even the most "fundamentalist" Christian sects. Not only do most Christians try to reduce the saying about the rich man and the eye of the needle to a dead letter, but the churches themselves internalize capitalist ethics in marketing their denominations. Since there is no public recognition of any religion, the churches must compete for adherents as private institutions, seeking markets for anxious souls. The medicine showman and the preacher were scarcely distinguishable in their techniques in the nineteenth century, and the fastest growing sect of the end of that century was Christian Science, which began as a moneymaking scheme selling Christianity as a medical practice. Evangelical preachers in that era regularly employed therapeutic language, as though Christianity were a medicine or vitamin designed to cheer people up. This new Christianity without the Cross would filter its way into the mainline denominations in the twentieth century.
The saturation of the consumer market in the last fifty years has forced companies to create an infinity of fictitious needs to be satisfied for a price. Immersed in consumerism and bombarded by advertising around the clock, the modern American has learned to value most things in terms of what it can do for him or how it will make him feel. When such a mentality is applied to religion, it results in the exact opposite of religion, God serving man.
The striking contradiction inherent in the conservative American's capitalist ethos is most easily seen in the deluge of banalities and smut generated by the capitalist behemoth and exported abroad, while evangelical, Pentecostal, or Mormon missionaries in the Third World preach against the evils that their beloved free enterprise system has forced into foreign markets. In the "conservative" American gospel, one can indeed serve both God and Mammon, and in Calvinist fashion, wealth, power, and prosperity are proof of God's favor.
The United States of America was the first nation in Christendom to deliberately exclude the Christian religion from its political constitution. All the nations of Europe and America then recognized Christianity in some form. The King of England was the head of the Church of England. The King of France was the "most Christian king," while the king of Spain was the "most Catholic king," and the Holy Roman Emperor was the Protector of the Church. The United States consciously banished Christianity from its political identity, confirming this intention in the Treaty of Tripoli (1797): "the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion." This treaty was unanimously approved by the Senate and proclaimed by President John Adams.
While the revelation that the United States was not founded on Christianity may be scandalous to conservative evangelicals who would like to remake the Founding Fathers in their own image, it is not at all surprising to those familiar with the religious and philosophical beliefs of the Founders, who commonly indulged in deism and freemasonry. While few of them would have supported the radical secularism of today's liberal judges who ban any religious expression at public expense, they were all wary of institutionalized churches like the Church of England, and wished to prevent any sect from having privilege over others.
The result, of course, was that no church in America was ever powerful enough to challenge the authority of the state, which did not regard itself as bound by any Christian principle. This conceit infects even social conservatives, who do not consider constitutional interpretations to be bound by natural law, nor regard foreign policy as constrained by just war criteria. This political liberalism, espoused even by so-called conservatives, is the natural complement of economic liberalism. American culture is so thoroughly indoctrinated with the belief that religion ought to play no role in politics, that we are incapable of appreciating what a radically heterodox idea that was only two centuries ago.
Many Americans consider the separation of church and state to be among their greatest contributions to the world, as if it cured the problem of religious warfare. The reality is that religious wars had already ended by the early eighteenth century, while the secularist movement, begun in France, created untold bloodshed in the name of enlightenment and democracy. To this day, many nations in Europe and America give state recognition to one or more churches, yet none of these nations have had religious warfare in centuries. The religious wars of the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries were in large part the result of the ruinous principle that a people should follow the confession of its prince. This all-or-none approach to religious belief in a literate age was a recipe for conflict, so even the most theologically rigorous recognized the need to at least tolerate religious minorities.
The American model of church-state relations, or the lack thereof, is particularly at odds with Catholic teaching, and the history of American Catholic treatments of this question provides a revealing example of how traditional Christianity was forced to yield to the American civic religion.
Catholic bishops in America had long recognized a tension between the civic religion and Catholic moral teaching, particularly on such precepts as the uncensored freedom of speech and the press, without regard for natural or divine law. The church-state question was ameliorated by the fact that the U.S. government was not openly hostile to the Church, so it was licit for Catholics to vote in American elections. Such was not the case, for example, in parts of Italy, where supposed advocates of democracy resorted to assassination, coups, and other political intrigues to divest the Pope of his lawful authority over the papal states. The 1891 version of the Baltimore Catechism plainly affirmed that the Pope was unjustly deprived of his temporal authority (Q 540), which was necessary to his government of the Church and provided the material basis for many of the Church's good works. (Q 541) Catholics were encouraged to pray for the restoration of the Pope's temporal power in Rome.
In response to the nakedly violent and anticlerical spirit of the secular democratic movements of continental Europe, Pope Pius IX (reigned 1846-1878), formerly solicitous of political liberals, issued sweeping condemnations of the errors of liberal democracy in his encyclical Quanta Cura (1864), accompanied by a Syllabus of Errors which, despite its notoriety, is actually restrained in its scope, condemning only the more egregiously anti-ecclesiastical forms of liberalism. In the encyclical, the Pope condemns the principle, then called "naturalism," that "the best constitution of public society and (also) civil progress altogether require that human society be conducted and governed without regard being had to religion any more than if it did not exist; or, at least, without any distinction being made between the true religion and false ones."
The Pope also condemns, as contrary to Scripture, the Church, and the Fathers, the belief that it is best for civil society when the civil government has no duty "of restraining by enacted penalties, offenders against the Catholic religion, except so far as public peace may require." While a religiously neutral state is tolerable, it is to be regarded as inferior to a Christian state, and it is heretical to assert that the Church was wrong to ask the civil government of Christian states to punish heretics, on the historically false assumption that this was an innovation of the Middle Ages. Indeed, the use of civil force against religious offenses is as ancient as civilization, and the idea that such practice is always inherently unjust was the innovation of anticlerical philosophes of the eighteenth century.
Pope Pius' teaching was thoroughly consistent with that of his predecessors, as a cursory review of Western history would easily show, but the spirit of liberalism was so widely propagated by his time, that he seemed to be a reactionary. This venerable pope has been widely slandered as being motivated by a thirst for temporal power, when in fact he forsook the opportunity to become the constitutional ruler of all Italy for the sake of his principles, as he refused to attack Catholic Austria, bravely resisting the racial nationalism of the day. On the other hand, the throat-slitting cabals of the Italian revolutionaries have been forgiven and even praised for their service of the god Democracy, though all they served in effect was the ambition of the Piedmontese kings.
Pius' successor, Pope Leo XIII (1878-1903), is best remembered for his social teaching and his advocacy of the legitimate concerns of the working poor against the tyrannical liberal capitalism that would rationalize everything under the law of markets. Those familiar with Pope Leo's social doctrines know the he was far from a simpleminded reactionary, so it is of especial import that he re-affirmed Pope Pius' teaching on church-state relations, declaring plainly in his encyclical Immortale Dei (1885):
It is not lawful for the State, any more than for the individual, either to disregard all religious duties or to hold in equal favor different kinds of religion. (Immortale Dei, 35)
Pope Leo confirmed that Pius' Syllabus was for Catholics "a light which they might safely follow" (34) to avoid error. Later in the encyclical, he elaborates:
The Church, indeed, deems it unlawful to place the various forms of divine worship on the same footing as the true religion, but does not, on that account, condemn those rulers who, for the sake of securing some great good or of hindering some great evil, allow patiently custom or usage to be a kind of sanction for each kind of religion having its place in the State. (36)
Although the Church can tolerate religious neutrality by the state, she rejects as incompatible with the Catholic faith the idea ("naturalism") that such neutrality is the preferable condition of civil society:
...the integrity of Catholic faith cannot be reconciled with opinions verging on naturalism or rationalism, the essence of which is utterly to do away with Christian institutions and to install in society the supremacy of man to the exclusion of God (47)
Pope Leo even goes so far as to address the ill-informed slanders against the medieval Church in its relation to temporal rulers, praising the accomplishments of the Christian states of old:
The State, constituted in this wise, bore fruits important beyond all expectation, whose remembrance is still, and always will be, in renown, witnessed to as they are by countless proofs which can never be blotted out or ever obscured by any craft of any enemies. Christian Europe has subdued barbarous nations, and changed them from a savage to a civilized condition, from superstition to true worship. It victoriously rolled back the tide of Mohammedan conquest; retained the headship of civilization; stood forth in the front rank as the leader and teacher of all, in every branch of national culture; bestowed on the world the gift of true and many-sided liberty; and most wisely founded very numerous institutions for the solace of human suffering.
All of our most cherished values, including the love of peace, liberty, and civility, which we take for granted as though they were culturally universal, are the fruit of that period of Church-State cooperation, when laws were formed in conformity with Christian teaching. The noblest aspects of our culture are the residue of that legacy, and to the extent that we return to a purely "naturalistic" or "secular" form of society, we will become indistinguishable from the pagans from which we emerged. Consequently:
To exclude the Church, founded by God Himself, from the business of life, from the power of making laws, from the training of youth, from domestic society, is a grave and fatal error. (32)
The value of this teaching is amply proven by the fact that wherever the Church has been excluded from such roles, Christian mores have eroded. As the populace becomes more secular by virtue of its religiously-neutral civil government, the demand for distinctively Christian morals in public laws and education diminishes even further. This conclusion, so obvious in the light of the irreligion of our day, that challenges even the most basic tenets of natural law, was already foreseen by Pope Leo over a century ago:
To hold, therefore, that there is no difference in matters of religion between forms that are unlike each other, and even contrary to each other, most clearly leads in the end to the rejection of all religion in both theory and practice. And this is the same thing as atheism, however it may differ from it in name. Men who really believe in the existence of God must, in order to be consistent with themselves and to avoid absurd conclusions, understand that differing modes of divine worship involving dissimilarity and conflict even on most important points cannot all be equally probable, equally good, and equally acceptable to God. (31)
Consistent with his condemnation of religious indifferentism, Pope Leo confirms Gregory XVI's encyclical Mirari Vos (1832) in its denunciation of these "sophisms":
...that no preference should be shown for any particular form of worship; that it is right for individuals to form their own personal judgments about religion; that each man's conscience is his sole and all-sufficing guide; and that it is lawful for every man to publish his own views, whatever they may be, and even to conspire against the State. (Immortale Dei, 34)
Here the Church condemns so-called freedom of religion, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press, as understood in the liberal sense, without regard to any preference for the Christian religion. In summary, several of the most sacred phrases of the United States' Constitution's First Amendment "rights" are regarded as merely tolerable by the Church, whereas to uphold these rights as the ideal or preferred condition of civil society is expressly contrary to the Catholic faith, as defined by Scripture, Tradition, the Fathers and the Popes in their solemn dogmatic teachings.
Thus the Church in the United States was confronted with the problem that the principle of the radical separation of Church and state (for the Church perennially taught that the spiritual and temporal powers indeed have separate roles, but are not on that account to be denied interaction with each other), one of the most potent forces corroding Christian mores throughout the world, was practically upheld as an article of faith by all Americans, including Catholics. This was especially the case as immigrants assimilated to the mainstream culture, which had been shaped by Protestants, agnostics, and deists.
Protestants and the non-religious were acutely aware of the Catholic Church's general stance against the liberal Church-state dichotomy, and anti-Catholic polemicists often made reference to papal teachings in order to discredit Catholic political candidates as potential subversives who would usher in a papist theocracy, given the opportunity. In response to these slanders, Catholics were pressured to assert their unwavering loyalty to the Constitution and the First Amendment, and to downplay the importance of the papal teachings, and indeed, any sort of dependence on Rome. The Church also had to wrestle with the perception that it was a foreign entity, ruled from Rome and consisting of various immigrant groups of questionable loyalties.
In response to virulent anti-Catholic bigotry, Catholics defensively professed their reverence for the civic religion. The Third Plenary Council in Baltimore (1884) declared, "We consider the establishment of our country's independence, the shaping of its liberties and laws, as a work of special Providence, its framers 'building better than they knew,' the Almighty's hand guiding them." When Woodrow Wilson brought the nation into the First World War, the American bishops headed by James Cardinal Gibbons formed the National Catholic War Council in order to raise money and personnel for the war effort. This War Council was the precursor to the National Conference of Catholic Bishops.
After the war, Cardinal Gibbons could proclaim in a pastoral letter (Sept. 26, 1919) that Catholics had proved their patriotism and devotion to American liberties. Nevertheless, he faithfully asserted Catholic teaching on the desirability of including religion in political life, quoting Pope Benedict XV:
Let princes and rulers of the people bear this in mind and bethink themselves whether it be wise and salutary, either for public authority or for the nations themselves, to set aside the holy religion of Jesus Christ, in which that very authority may find such powerful support and defense. Let them seriously consider whether it be the part of political wisdom to exclude from the ordinance of the State and from public instruction, the teaching of the Gospel and of the Church. Only too well does experience show that when religion is banished, human authority totters to its fall. (Ad Beatissimi, 1914)
Despite the gentleness with which the bishops asserted Catholic social doctrine, nativist and anti-Catholic bigotry remained strong even after the war, as typified by the revival of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1920s. Immigration became tightly restricted, reducing the influx of Catholics. Catholicism in the U.S. became more self-enclosed culturally, aided by its robust catechesis and parochial school system. It is against this background of anti-Catholic hostility and Catholic defensiveness that the events of 1927-1928 should be understood.
Alfred E. Smith, the governor of New York, became the first Catholic presidential nominee of a major party when he received the Democratic nomination in 1928. He was the target of anti-Catholic polemics in the vein described previously as early as 1927. This controversy brought Catholic social teaching on Church-state relations to the forefront of public discourse. While Smith's opponents often misrepresented and exaggerated the Church's teachings as advocating theocracy, even the authentic teaching of the Church represented a serious stumbling-block to popular acceptance of a Catholic candidate. Since many Catholics by that time had come to accept the American dogma of non-establishment of religion, the public discussion of these issues created conflict and confusion among Catholics. Smith himself did not seem to understand the doctrinal issues, but made clear that he upheld the American civic religion perfectly: "I believe in absolute freedom of conscience for all men and equality of all churches, all sects, and all beliefs before the law as a matter of right and not as a matter of favor. I believe in the absolute separation of church and state..." (Atlantic Monthly, April 1927)
Smith's protestation of civic orthodoxy was insufficient to overcome anti-Catholic paranoia, and he lost in a landslide to Herbert Hoover, losing even several Southern states that had been Democratic strongholds. Some campaign buttons by Hoover supporters read, "A Christian in the White House." It was clear from the Smith debacle that nothing less than total capitulation to the American civic religion would make Catholics acceptable to the general populace, and even that was no guarantee.
The bishops, rather than boldly proclaim the Church's authentic teaching in the face of what would have been a calamitous reaction, instead requested to be dispensed from imposing any teaching on this matter. Rather than risk Catholics being effectively excluded from political life, it was deemed preferable to assent to the American system until some later time when a clear assertion of the Church's doctrine would be practicable. In 1928, the American bishops received a dispensation from teaching some of the Church's doctrines on the unlawful (though tolerable) status of a religiously neutral state, without denying these doctrines. This was permitted as a prudential measure, due to the cultural circumstances just described.
Whatever the merits of such a prudential judgment, the suppression of the Church's teaching on church-state relations produced an entire generation of American Catholics raised in ignorance of this teaching, an ignorance which would be passed to their descendants. Understandably, many considered that the teaching of Leo XIII and his predecessors had been abandoned, not knowing that this doctrine continued to be taught in other Catholic countries. It also reinforced a more general sense that the United States was socially independent of Rome and indeed could teach Rome the error of its ways on matters of political philosophy. In approving this dispensation, the Holy Office departed from the advice of Pope Leo in Testem Benevolentiae (1899):
Far be it, then, for any one to diminish or for any reason whatever to pass over anything of this divinely delivered doctrine; whosoever would do so, would rather wish to alienate Catholics from the Church than to bring over to the Church those who dissent from it. Let them return; indeed, nothing is nearer to Our heart; let all those who are wandering far from the sheepfold of Christ return; but let it not be by any other road than that which Christ has pointed out.
In the 1880s and 1890s, the bishops of the United States had excelled in their obedience to Pope Leo XIII, proclaiming even the Church's more difficult doctrines in the face of cultural adversity. The concession of 1928 would be the beginning of a creeping sense of American exceptionalism among the bishops, akin to that "Americanism" which Pope Leo had condemned in Testem Benevolentiae. The social teaching of the Church regarding the temporal power was omitted from later versions of the Baltimore Catechism, such as the 1941 edition.
Another apparent compromise on Catholic social doctrine would come in 1941, when President Roosevelt proposed to give direct military aid to Joseph Stalin's regime, following Nazi Germany's invasion of the Soviet Union in June of that year. Many American Catholics were alarmed by this decision, since the late Pope Pius XI had prohibited direct aid to any Communist regime in his encyclical letter Divini Redemptoris (1937): "Communism is intrinsically wrong, and no one who would save Christian civilization may collaborate with it in any undertaking whatsoever."
Roosevelt appealed to Pope Pius XII to allay Catholic concerns, so Pope Pius authorized the Auxiliary Bishop of Cleveland, Michael Ready, to interpret Divini Redemptoris as not applying to the current action by the U.S. government, since the intention was to help the Russian people, not the Communist regime.
The attitude of the Holy See with regard to the Communist doctrine is and remains what it has always been. However, the Holy See has nothing whatsoever against the Russian people. It is now the Russian people, which has been unjustly attacked and is suffering greatly as a consequence of this unjust war. This being so, Catholics should not have any objections to collaborating with the United States government to help the Russian people by giving the latter such help as they need.
This interpretation was authorized by the Pope through his apostolic delegate in Washington, Archbishop Amleto Cicognani, but it had the unfortunate appearance of seeming to vindicate the idea that Catholic social doctrine ought to yield before American public policy. The American clergy's close ties with the Democratic party would drive it to increasingly untenable positions as the party drifted to the left.
The wisdom of Pius XI's admonition was proven by history, as the world paid a steep price for its collaboration with the Soviet Union. Eastern Europe suffered under the yoke of Communism for fifty years, while the rest of the world lived under the threat of total annihilation, during a decades-long war of attrition that cost millions of lives.
By the time John F. Kennedy ran for president in 1960, Catholic assimilation to the American civic ideology was practically complete. His candidacy was challenged by several of the same accusations of dual loyalty that troubled Governor Smith in 1928, but this time they were easily dismissed by the liberal senator, who unequivocally denied that Catholic teaching would affect his governance, in order to assuage his skeptics. From this point onward, the civic religion of the United States would take precedence over Catholic teaching for most Catholics, as the bishops as a rule did not dare contradict Kennedy's heterodox understanding of Church-state relations.
The American Jesuit John Courtney Murray attempted to promote the American concept of separation of Church and state in the drafting of the Second Vatican Council's Declaration on Religious Freedom, Dignitatis Humanae. Conservative bishops from the Spanish-speaking world blocked this effort, so the final text stated:
Religious freedom, in turn, which men demand as necessary to fulfill their duty to worship God, has to do with immunity from coercion in civil society. Therefore it leaves untouched traditional Catholic doctrine on the moral duty of men and societies toward the true religion and toward the one Church of Christ. (Dignitatis Humanae, 1)
The teaching of the popes through Leo XIII was not to be repudiated, but to remain intact. Immunity from religious coercion was not a novel principle, but as ancient as the faith, for as St. Augustine observed, it would be impossible to compel belief even if it were lawful. This does not prohibit the Catholic Church from establishing itself as a state-sponsored religion, as in fact remains the case to various extents in many countries to this day. Thus the content of Dignitatis Humanae and the facts of recent history prove the Church has not adopted the American ideal of Church-state relations.
In recent decades, most American bishops have become too timid to impose even ecclesiastical penalties on Catholic politicians who openly defy Church teachings, much less adopt positions on civic matters. When John Cardinal O'Connor in 1984 merely criticized a Catholic politician who tolerated abortion, he was widely condemned as violating the separation of church and state, which was now interpreted in an even more radical sense, to forbid the Church from having any say on public morality. When Cardinal O'Connor in 1990 threatened pro-abortion Catholic politicians with the possibility of excommunication, he was even more widely denounced. The enthronement of civil government as the sole arbiter of public morality was by this point complete.
From the 1970s onward, left-wing social extremism became increasingly mainstream via a series of Supreme Court decisions, which reinterpreted several civil rights in a way that made the enforcement of traditional morality practically impossible. Some popular examples include the banning of school prayer and the display of religious symbols on public grounds, injunctions against laws prohibiting abortion, sodomy, and pornography, and draconian restrictions on indirect state funding of religious institutions. As some of these libertine and antiecclesiastical ideas became part of the Democratic Party's platform, many Catholics drifted to the Republican Party, where they risk becoming ensnared by that party's commitment to militarism and extreme economic liberalism.
The cultural challenges faced by Catholics in the United States might not have been so problematic were it not for the presumption of American exceptionalism, bordering on nationalistic messianism, that pervades the national discourse. It is only to be expected that this ethos should eventually creep into Catholicism, and we can only admire the fortitude of the Church in America to have resisted this tendency for so long.
This tendency to assume that the "American way" of liberal political economy was fully compatible with the Catholic faith was once given the name "Americanism." In the late nineteenth century, a French biography of the deceased American priest Isaac Thomas Hecker portrayed Fr. Hecker as espousing a number of heretical doctrines, including the disparagement of religious vocations. While it is disputable whether Fr. Hecker himself held the heretical views that were imputed to him, Pope Leo XIII took care to specify which of these beliefs were in fact untenable for Catholics. In his 1899 encyclical, Testem Benevolentiae, Pope Leo addressed several "Americanist" heresies, recognizing in these novel opinions a common principle:
...in order to more easily attract those who differ from her, the Church should shape her teachings more in accord with the spirit of the age and relax some of her ancient severity and make some concessions to new opinions... even in regard to doctrines which belong to the deposit of the faith. They contend that it would be opportune, in order to gain those who differ from us, to omit certain points of her teaching which are of lesser importance, and to tone down the meaning which the Church has always attached to them.
Such opinions were clearly contrary to the teaching of the First Vatican Council:
For the doctrine of faith which God has revealed has not been proposed, like a philosophical invention to be perfected by human ingenuity, but has been delivered as a divine deposit to the Spouse of Christ to be faithfully kept and infallibly declared. Hence that meaning of the sacred dogmas is perpetually to be retained which our Holy Mother, the Church, has once declared, nor is that meaning ever to be departed from under the pretense or pretext of a deeper comprehension of them. (Constitutio de Fide Catholica, Chapter iv)
This notion that the Catholic Church must "change with the times" in matters of doctrine arises from the triumphalist American sense of human perfectibility through economic progress and political reform. This ethos, in which the new is invariably an improvement over the old, is in sharp contrast with the Catholic ethos of reverently preserving what has been handed down from antiquity.
The encyclical enumerates several specific heretical opinions which are grounded in this false principle. Among these is the notion that...
...external guidance is set aside for those souls who are striving after Christian perfection as being superfluous or indeed, not useful in any sense - the contention being that the Holy Spirit pours richer and more abundant graces than formerly upon the souls of the faithful, so that without human intervention He teaches and guides them by some hidden instinct of His own.
This excuse of ignoring ecclesiastical authority by direct appeal to the Holy Spirit is just pietistic Protestant presumption. As Pope Leo observes, no man can say whether the Holy Spirit is more or less abundant now than previously, for the Spirit is free to dispense grace as He wishes.
Another heretical opinion is that natural virtues are to be extolled above the supernatural virtues. This is the myth of "being a good person", in the form of philanthropy, industry, and love of family and country, as more important than the virtues of faith, hope, and charity. Along these lines, so-called "active" virtues are deemed more important than supposedly "passive" virtues such as the contemplation and mortification practiced by monks and nuns. This emphasis on the temporal, if taken seriously, would invert the divine order and makes the saints unworthy of veneration. This heresy would place the "kingdom of God" in this world, with salvation achieved through the Pelagian means of "being a good person."
It is easy to see that the Americanist doctrine of "being a good person" denies the reality of original sin and concupiscence and effectively makes man his own savior. This smug, self-satisfied form of Protestantism was mercilessly skewered by Mark Twain in The Man That Corrupted Hadleyburg. It is a rich irony that a predominantly Protestant nation should succumb to a form of Pelagianism, but this only shows how much American culture had deviated from even Protestant "orthodoxy" in the nineteenth century.
Another Americanist opinion condemned by the Pope was the belief that men ought to have the freedom to think, say or print anything without regard to truth. This liberal principle, enshrined as a sacred democratic ideal, presumes that truth is unknowable or of no concern to the state. Such a principle, applied to matters of faith and morals, is inadmissible to a Catholic, for whom it is not lawful to propagate ideas contrary to the received deposit of faith.
The bishops of the United States assured the Pope that such heretical views were not common in their day. If they sound familiar to the modern Catholic, it is because several of these views have come to dominate Catholic discourse since the Second Vatican Council, under the pretext of being endorsed by that ecumenical synod.
For example, as noted previously, it is pretended that the American notion of "freedom of religion" (religious indifferentism of the state) was endorsed by the Council. In fact, the Council defined religious freedom as "immunity from coercion in civil society" in the matter of accepting religious doctrine. This freedom of conscience had been perennially taught by the Church, from St. Augustine through the Scholastic Doctors. Since this freedom only involves not compelling people to change their beliefs, "it leaves untouched traditional Catholic doctrine on the moral duty of men and societies toward the true religion and toward the one Church of Christ." (Dignitatis Humanae, 1) To this day, the Church maintains concordats with numerous Catholic nations, in which the Church claims preferential treatment by the state, even to the extent of being recognized as the state religion, and receiving state funding for religious schools and the stipends of bishops.
None of the Americanist opinions, nor their underlying principle that religious doctrine (as opposed to discipline) should change with the times, can be found in the sixteen documents of the Second Vatican Council, but that has not prevented unscrupulous Catholics from promoting these views in the name of a fictitious "spirit of Vatican II." This "spirit" is really the spirit of Americanism, which, after a century of fermentation, has adopted bolder manifestations in the wake of post-conciliar relaxation of canonical discipline.
The legacy of pietism and Americanism can be seen in the fuzzy appeals to the "work of the Holy Spirit" to rationalize any repudiation of traditional doctrine or practice, the emphasis on "relationship," "community," and the "social Gospel" as being more important than traditional forms of piety, which are derided as sterile and antiquated. Most importantly, the American ethos of preferring novelty for its own sake, what Pope Leo called a "harmful and deplorable passion for innovation" (Immortale Dei, 23), has permeated the liturgical life of the Church and even the theological faculties. These modernist principles adopt a distinctively American character to the extent that the "American Church" views itself as being at the cutting edge of innovation, and even the teacher of Rome on how best to adapt Catholicism to the "needs of the people."
As a result of this assimilation to the general culture, Catholicism in the United States has lost much of its distinctiveness, as Catholics now divorce, abort, contracept, and stop attending church at the same woeful rates as their Protestant counterparts, when such was emphatically not the case only a half-century ago. If, as our Lord said, men are to be known by their fruits, we need only look at these trends, combined with the cataclysmic 90% drop in vocations and religious educators, to declare that the new church of pietistic Americanism is a failure as a Catholic Christian church. Just as the unbelieving Jews, followed by the Nestorians, Monophysites, Eastern Orthodox, Anglicans, Lutherans and Calvinists all withered and decayed as they broke away from the trunk of Christ's fruitful olive tree that is the Catholic Church, so the Church in the United States has withered wherever it departs from the apostolic authority that is the only authentic means by which the Holy Spirit is received.
It would be very erroneous to draw the conclusion that in America is to be sought the type of the most desirable status of the Church. - Pope Leo XIII, Catholicity in the United States
As G.K. Chesterton observed, the United States sees itself as more than a nation, but as the incarnation of a political ideology that is to be a model for the rest of the world. Consequently, acceptance of that ideology is a requisite for all citizens, lest they be regarded as traitors or "un-American". Socialists, internationalists, and monarchists can be Englishmen or Frenchmen, but not Americans, because this last nationality defines itself by its political ideology. Traditional forms of Christianity, such as Anglicanism and Catholicism, or even the state-sanctioned Lutheranism of Scandinavia, also find themselves in fundamental tension with the American civic religion. In order to be accepted as Americans, immigrants who adhere to these faiths have sought to downplay or even compromise their doctrine to conform to the indigenous culture, with its peculiarly pietistic Protestantism and its deistic theory of political economy.
In the case of the Catholic Church, the tension is especially acute, as that Church has a transnational character and openly regards itself as superior to the temporal power. A true Catholic is enjoined to place his ecumenical religious identity above his national identity, but this creates an impossible contradiction in a country where national identity is conceived in almost messianic terms. Much worse, several of the most exalted tenets of the American civic religion are in direct opposition to the historic teaching of the Church. The fact that most American Catholics disregard the latter in order to fully embrace the former does not abolish the contradiction, but represents the superior command of national loyalty, as proven by the shaping of culture through increasingly liberal legislation in open defiance of the impotent churches. We have seen that this hostility to traditional Christianity is not some recent invention of the political left, but extends back to the founding. The conclusion that few American Catholics wish to face is that American culture, from the beginning, in its depths, in its marrow, is fundamentally hostile to Catholicism.
In some respects, it is amazing that such a conclusion should be resisted. For a nation that was founded by deists, freemasons, and assorted Protestants of less established sects, it is hardly any surprise that its political principles and attitude toward ecclesiastical institutions and traditional religion is radically incompatible with Catholicism. It would be a miracle if it were otherwise. Being formed in English culture, there is the additional disadvantage of a legacy of virulent anti-Catholicism and hostility to the Latin peoples. Catholic immigrants, and subgroups such as the Italians, have had to renounce much of their distinctiveness in order to assimilate a Protestant ethos of pragmatism, aesthetic barrenness, and messianic nationalism.
Thus, to hear a Catholic speak of his ancestors will be little different than what a Protestant polemicist might have said a century ago. The rituals and pious practices of Latin Catholicism are signs of ignorance and provinciality, to be supplanted by a more enlightened Anglo-Saxon Catholicism. As Americanism has taken hold over much of the Church in the United States, few would see any absurdity in the American Catholic presuming to correct the practices of other Catholic nationalities, or even of the universal Church itself. It would perhaps be uncharitable to elaborate in detail the level of illiteracy that now passes as enlightened discourse, but anyone familiar with the richness and sophistication of medieval theology and moral philosophy cannot help but regard the modern schools of thought as puerile, pseudo-mystical attempts at profundity. The modern Catholic presumes to find truths his ancestors missed by applying a clumsy understanding of philosophy, logic, and rhetoric to a poorly defined theology. The decay of rigorous classical learning is a subject unto itself, which can hardly be treated here.
To justify the widespread ignorance of the intellectual and spiritual traditions of Christianity, it becomes necessary to affirm that tradition does not matter, if we are to regard ourselves as competent to decide religious questions. This attitude undercuts the need for an ecclesiastical authority to interpret these traditions, and favors the Protestant doctrine of private interpretation, which easily elides into "freedom of conscience" in the heretical sense of making the conscience independent of divine or natural law. Mark Twain deftly ridiculed this belief that everyone is competent to judge questions of religious or political doctrine:
There are seventy-five million men and women among us who do not know how to cut out and make a dress-suit, and they would not think of trying; yet they all think they can competently think out a political or religious scheme without any apprenticeship to the business, and many of them believe they have actually worked that miracle. (Christian Science, Book I, Ch. IX)
Although Twain rejected ecclesiastical authority, he had the good sense to recognize the absurdity of replacing that authority with egalitarian private judgment.
We have seen that the idea that doctrine does not matter comes from the pietistic tradition, which instead proposes subjective experience as the only measure of importance. This effectively reduces "being a good person" to one's subjective judgment, and it is no surprise that most will judge themselves favorably. The very notion of "being a good person" is utterly contrary to the basis of Christianity, which presumes that people are essentially sinful and in need of redemption and mercy, without which they cannot be saved.
While pietism does not always lead to religious indifferentism, it can promote a utilitarian concept of religion, which emphasizes “getting something out of” a religion or using it as a means of fulfillment. This attitude is diametrically opposed to the concept religio, which consists of one's obligations and duties to the gods. This fundamentally anti-religious attitude explains why even some "conservative" evangelicals will say that "Christianity is not a religion", but an "experience" or a "relationship". The latter claims have truth to them, but it is a manifest falsehood to deny a religious dimension to Christianity, as this would declare we have no duties to God.
As I emphasized at the beginning, this discussion paints a sociological picture with broad strokes, making little attempt to identify precisely how widespread is each of the ideas discussed. The reader is undoubtedly aware that there are many admirable exceptions to these critiques, but hopefully now will also be able to identify the pervasive influence of these heterodox ideologies in even the more "conservative" Christian churches.
Nationalist pride comes not from the Son who emptied Himself in infinite humility, but from the Gentiles of Babylon and Rome. Proof of enlightenment is not to be found in military or economic might, but in the Christian virtues. As a sign of hope, the Church in Mexico has adapted to the modern world in a way that respects traditional expressions of personal piety, with veneration of the saints and all the other unseemly Latin practices which are so overtly religious, as opposed to merely "spiritual." What is more, the Church there is growing, with Mass attendance actually increasing to over 50%. Sadly, many Mexican immigrants to the United States find "enlightened" clergy attempting to "correct" their Catholicism into the Protestantized U.S. version. One would think that the American love of capitalism might induce the clergy to follow a successful business model instead of imposing their failed model on others. This only shows that the current "modernist" trend in the Church in the U.S. is motivated more by ideological convictions than genuine pastoral concerns. These convictions do not come not from the Second Vatican Council, as study of the Council's documents will show. Instead, they are the fruit of the historically anti-Catholic culture of the United States of America to which the Catholic Church and other churches have assimilated themselves at the peril of their Christian identity.
© 2007 Daniel J. Castellano. All rights reserved. http://www.arcaneknowledge.org


text:
Photograph of Webb County Courthouse at the corner of Matamoros Street and Flores Avenue in Laredo, Texas. In front of the building a man in a suit is walking in the street near a horse-drawn carriage.
Photograph of buildings destroyed by a tornado in Laredo, Texas in 1904. In Jerry Thompson's book, Laredo: A Pictorial History, this photo is described as remains of the depot and roundhouse of the Mexican National Railway.
Three water vendor carts in front of what appears to be a water tank. Water vendors were called barrileros or aguadores. Correspondence reads, "At Laredo, Going over into Mexico this afternoon, so if I fail to send you a card, the Insurrectos have got me." This card was written and mailed to Miss Mollie Chaney in Longview, Texas on February 13, 1913 in Laredo, Texas.
This dialog allows you to filter your current search.
Each of the Years listed note their name and the number of records that will be limited down to if you choose that option.
The list can be sorted by name or the count.

domain: geography


CAT - S48c with 64GB Memory Cell Phone (Unlocked) - Black
Android 8.0 Oreo4G LTE speed5" screen13.0MP rear- and 5.0MP front-facing camerasCompatible with most major US carriers, including AT&T, T-Mobile, and Verizon Wireless and Sprint
Stay connected in harsh conditions with this CAT S48c rugged waterproof smartphone. The durable chassis and waterproofing survive submersion in water and easily withstand drops, dust and extreme temperatures. This CAT S48c rugged waterproof smartphone has a 5-inch Full HD touch display that responds to commands from wet hands for on-the-job communication.
Height: 5.9 inches
Depth: 0.5 inches
- CAT S48c
- 4000 mAh Battery
- Power adapter


text:
Foursquare © 2015 Lovingly made in NYC & SF
Restaurant · $
40444 Murrieta Hot Springs Rd
"I thought it was delicious!! So much better than getting fast food and their menu is huge! My 10 year old loved her kids meal as well which wasn't the usual burger and chicken strip choice."
Anthony's Lounge & Ristorante
Italian · $$$
24630 Washington Ave
"Everything is fabulous. Love the house dressing, I could drink it! Favs: ravioli, chicken piccata, lasagna... Classy atmosphere."
One Sushi Bar & Grill
Sushi · $$
40461 Murrieta Hot Springs Rd
"Definitely sit at the bar ad order the all you can eat sushi! They'll even make you a decorate monkey made out of an orange for desert! So cute and yummy!"
Make sure your information is up to date. Plus use our free tools to find new customers.

domain: food


text:
OCEAN CITY — For the average equity investor, 2013 was certainly a year to celebrate. As financial markets and the global economy continue to normalize, we outline some key investor resolutions for 2014.
Resolution #1: Pay attention to the economy and the Federal Reserve. The macroeconomic backdrop has been a critical determinant of asset performance in recent years. We think that will continue to be the case in the year ahead.
Resolution #2: Check on corporate America’s earnings. A key feature of this year’s equity market gains has been multiple expansion — an increase in the price/earnings ratio. We are optimistic that improving economic growth should support stronger earnings growth with U.S. and global GDP accelerating in the year ahead.
Resolution #3: Temper enthusiasm for equities. Few investors expected stocks to perform as strongly as they did in 2013. At the beginning of the year even the most bullish sell-side strategists were only looking for gains of around 13%. But after a 30%+ rally, the S&P 500 index is no longer undervalued but rather is closer to fair value, in our opinion. That’s not to say we are not constructive on U.S. equities.
Our expectations are more in line with long-term equity returns. At present, BofAML Global Research forecasts the S&P 500 to finish 2014 at 2000, or just 9.0% higher than its current level, generating less than half the returns for 2013.This brings us to the final resolution.
Resolution #4: Invest according to goals. As past CIO publications have noted, we believe investors should first and foremost invest according to their goals and regularly measure progress toward them. U.S. equities have had a great run, with the S&P 500 rising more than 150% from the lows of 2009. As the global economy and asset markets begin to normalize in 2014, we recommend clients consider rebalancing their portfolios, if need be, and bring them more in line with their strategic asset allocations.
A proper rebalancing plan is one way to reduce the likelihood that such deviations from goals-based allocations could become unintended risks. Happy investing in 2014.
(A Merrill Lynch Wealth Management Advisor who can be reached at 410-213-8520.)

domain: news


text:
Enjoy Playing Online Casino Games in Korea
Online casino Korea is really a place to purchase among the best online casino gambling. It is possible to play poker and blackjack free of charge. Additionally, there are casino games like Roulette and baccarat designed for you. In online casino Korea, you will find many poker games including TEXAS HOLD EM. The slot machines may also be very popular here.
Online casino korea gives you a chance to benefit from the fun without leaving the comforts of your house or office. Blackjack and roulette will be the most popular games 넷마블 바카라 here. Online casinos give you the opportunity to play the games free of charge. In addition, these games may also be highly attractive since apart from that they are also for free to play. Thus, it becomes an extra advantage for players.
Before you start playing, there are certain conditions apply in online casino korea that you have to follow. Quite often, there are welcome bonuses offered aswell. For winning in game blackjack or roulette, you can be given a welcome bonus. This is usually a reward given to you when you are enjoying your time playing.
While in Korea, the rules are different from the traditional online casinos, there are particular similarities too. Before depositing, you have to ensure that you have enough funds in your account to cover the risk. After winning, you must transfer the winnings to your bank account. There is absolutely no faxing of winnings in Korean casinos.
In Korea, gambling is a national pastime. It’s been the most popular pastimes for individuals here. In fact, gambling is a part of the country’s culture for years and years. The influx of foreign players into the country during the past decades in addition has prompted the rise of online casinos in Korea. Nowadays there are several well-known sites designed for players from US and Europe.
Online casinos in Korea have grown to be very popular not only among the Koreans but among many different gaming enthusiasts from all over the world. With their free software along with other bonuses, they attract many different gamers. You can find progressive jackpots for every game, and these increase every year. Many sites also offer members the opportunity to participate in the World Group of Poker. This is a series of card games that allows players from across the world to get involved in a fun activity.
Joining a site will give you usage of online casino korea with various gaming options. The website also offers many types of blackjack games like Omaha, Texas holdem, seven card stud, joker, etc. If you’re looking for an activity to enjoy with your friends, you should think about playing blackjack on the site. Most players are required to open a gaming account before they are able to start playing. After you have a gaming account, it is possible to transfer funds to your Korean currency account through bank cards or PayPal. You may also withdraw your winnings to your Korean currency account.
Another best part about casino korea is that there are several bingo websites that also allow players to win virtual money through the use of vapor cigarettes. These vapor cigarettes, which contain nicotine, do not cause harm to the body like other tobacco products. So, to be able to try something new and exciting, then consider playing some bingo games online in one of the many casino korea locations.
Most sites give you the opportunity to make deposits and also winning prizes. In addition to that, you can also participate in online activities such as for example gambling tournaments and win prizes. If you’ve always wanted to win in the world of gambling, then it’s time that you try to play in one of the best online casinos in Korea. To get the best deal, make certain you look at the entire package. This consists of the welcome bonus, registration bonuses, deposit bonuses, etc.
Apart from playing online casino korea, many tourists also enjoy visiting Korean restaurants and bars. Most of these restaurants accept international bank cards and the best part about any of it is that they do not require you to stand in lines. However, when you do make deposits, make sure that you withdraw them at the same time you receive the winnings. It might be better if you withdraw them right away to enable you to enjoy playing in the casinos.
Since Korean blackjack has grown in popularity recently, more Korean online casinos are being established. These casinos offer exciting top quality games so that you can play. It doesn’t matter if you’re a beginner or perhaps a veteran player, it is possible to always find something that you will surely enjoy. In fact, blackjack is one of the most popular online casino games which are played by people from all walks of life.

domain: entertainment


text:
On January 24, 2016, Hindus, especially Tamils, in Malaysia will observe the annual Thaipusam festival. The festival
On January 24, 2016, Hindus, especially Tamils, in Malaysia will observe the annual Thaipusam festival. The festivalis dedicated to Lord Murugan. The best place to see this festival is the Batu Caves, north of Kuala Lumpur. The caves are a part of a limestone hill said to be millions of years old. From the base of the hill, you have to climb 272 concrete steps to reach the caves. Many devotees pierce their bodies with sharp instruments and even carry a contraption called ‘kavadi’. This ritual attracts a lot of viewers. Be prepared for a huge crowd and piles of floral offerings lying strewn around.
The festival is also held on a grand scale in Singapore.
Where: Malaysia, especially Batu Caves
When: January 24, 2016


text:
There’s a scene in the 1971 film Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory where the title character shows off his “revolutionary, nonpollutionary, mechanical wonder” in action. Willy Wonka, with a twinkle in his eye, pushes a single button, and the entire machine whirs to life, mixing and milling and drilling. After a few seconds of constrained chaos, out pops a flawless, delectable-looking piece of chewing gum.
If only manufacturing were this easy, environmentally friendly, and automated. However, even as emerging technologies allow increasing complexity and fidelity, the state of the manufacturing industry today is far from that fantastical factory—and its future is up for grabs.
Manufacturing in the United States has endured a pretty harrowing trajectory during the past few decades. The segment of Americans working in the industry has fallen from 32.1% of the total workforce at its peak in 1953 to roughly 8.5% in 2017, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. And a report published by McKinsey’s Global Institute found that the median US factory is 25 years old, with machinery averaging nine years old. US manufacturers have been deferring investment and focusing on cutting costs—tactics plagued by short-term thinking.
Fast-forward to 2019, when advances in automation are pushing a new story of disruption in manufacturing. In former industrial regions such as the Midwest, major manufacturers have long since left small towns and cities, abandoning an aging workforce with highly specialized skills. However, encouraging recent growth figures from Rust Belt towns suggest that those smaller population hubs could ultimately drive a manufacturing resurgence.
Willy Wonka’s chocolate factory was impressive because it provided an instantaneous supply to meet endless needs and wants. In the Midwest, issues like skills shortage, an aging population, and a lack of capital are real. But what if the future could operate like something out of a fictional world—and actually work?
Toward a Possible Future
Rather than attempting to re-create the past, the manufacturing industry needs to focus on competing in the future. And the agents for success are emerging—in previously unlikely areas such as construction. Forward-thinking design workflows consider the afterlife of a building before it’s built: selecting low-impact materials and planning for the eventual disassembling of components to be repurposed elsewhere. As construction and manufacturing converge, could this type of innovative process extend to everything that’s made or built?
A speculative scenario developed in Autodesk Research shows one way forward for manufacturing in the Midwest, modeled around a network of configurable microfactories that leverages the manufacturing-as-a-service concept.
Imagine a small fictional town impacted by local plant closures, one with no jobs, no money, and a desolate Main Street resembling a scene from an old Western film. While an aging population nears retirement with few prospects to earn income, younger residents have left town to attend college and seek job opportunities. But as new growth areas emerge, more affordable property values and new types of jobs could slowly bring a younger workforce back to small towns and reinvigorate local economies.
This scenario envisions a future in which microfactories have become agile and broad: Facilities would no longer be constrained by single-use equipment and highly specialized software tools capable of creating only a single product or part. Instead, think about one factory that could virtually upload a new toolset to reconfigure its workflow to meet new demands.
Ride-sharing apps have disrupted transportation, and other industries continue to move away from product ownership toward the “usership” of services. A manufacturing-as-a-service model could look like an agile “Rust Road manufactory network”—a consortium of connected microfactories that major corporations could subscribe to for an access fee.
And as demand for particular products shifts, so could the nature of the manufacturing process. Reconfiguring and connecting capabilities across a system of small factories could more efficiently deliver a final product. The fictional Rust Road manufactory network appropriates a real initiative: China’s “One Belt, One Road,” which calls for a revival of the Silk Road Economic Belt, attempting to leverage greater connectivity and cooperation across geographic borders. Part of this process would mean improving transport infrastructure and initiating policy reforms to reduce costs, leading to increased trade and investment.
New Roles for a New World
Smart infrastructure and emerging technologies such as robotics are already creating new roles in construction—but in future small-town microfactories, what other roles might emerge?
A “cobot site manager” could leverage decades of experience managing workers to oversee robot and human teams on the factory floor and construction sites. A “nomadic systems architect” might mediate complex construction and manufacturing networks, assessing optimal technology solutions and resource constraints and then liaising between designers and builders across regions.
As new products and parts are designed and new methods emerge to meet manufacturing demand, “robot trainers” could be brought in to run simulations, use augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) to gather knowledge from workers, and then leverage those insights, coding them into machine-learning algorithms—ultimately training the robots to work better in partnership with humans.
Half of the world’s population is now considered middle class or wealthier, and the demand for more—more housing, goods, food, and transportation—is driven by these demographic shifts. Increased demands might also increase small towns’ opportunities to reinvigorate their economies by meeting the supply issue.
Architects and builders are already streamlining manufacturing processes to make construction more modular, repeatable, and efficient. And manufacturers are gleaning insights from construction sites, leveraging agile systems for factories that can be restructured to adapt quickly to rapidly changing, customized demands.
Technological advances in artificial-intelligence and tools such as generative design also help designers explore better solutions, optimize for materials and manufacturing methods, and leverage insights from existing builds to ensure a better build next time. VR and AR—originally developed for gaming and film—are being used for design collaboration, helping teams make decisions in real time with better data.
This vision may not be as whimsical as Willy Wonka’s, but perhaps that’s not what’s needed after all. When a manufacturing ecosystem becomes networked and distributed, regional and local entities are better equipped to compete in a constantly changing industry. As we look to the next decade, companies young and old—and cities large and small—will need to find new ways to drive value. Setting up the infrastructure now could ensure that both organizations and employees come out on the winning side.


text:
The retainment agenda to see Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo Addo reelected and Dr Rashid Kwesi Etuaful voted as MP for the Constituency is on course.
V20 Patriots, a volunteer group which seek to campaign for the New Patriotic Party and ensure victory was inaugurated yesterday with the installation of new leadership who were democratically elected to see to all affairs of this vibrant group.
Membership of the group remains teachers and other the professionals who are ready to commit their time and energy to the undoubted winning of NPP 2020.
Mr. John Asante Mensah, the new Chairman assured the members of a clean but sure campaign. “V20 Patriots put the party first in all our dealings and we will ensure that every corner of the Constituency is visited so as to preach the good things the Government is doing and will do to the people in round 2. We shall not allow the NDC to excel in their propaganda against the government” V20 Patriots (formrly V16) contributed to the existing Free SHS, Free water and light and others Nana Addo is rolling and we must be counted among those who worked to bring Rent loan scheme and the Students loans to university graduates without guarantors” he added.
The Constituency 1st Vice Chairman,Mr Stephen Bennett , who doubles as Patron of V20 explained the need for total commitment towards the campaign which will see Nana Addo and Dr Rashid Kwesi Etuaful elected come December 7. “We cannot have our competent government in power and be orphans under this no-direction NDC MP here. We are to double our efforts in 2016 this year to scatter the NDC once and for all”
Ghanaians remember that NDC in central region lost most of their seats in the 2016 elections because their campaign manager was made a confused man and so he kept all resources meant for other Constituencies. V16 Teachers who are now V20 Patriots were one of the groups that masterminded the agenda and they are here again with full assurance to Nana Addo and Dr Rashid of their unflinching support.
“We have to wish that history has us in its indelible records that it was during our time that after 12 years of being under the chop chop NDC in Ajumako Enyan Essiam,we recovered the seat for the NPP with Dr Rashid Kwesi Etuaful as our member of parliament. The beautiful thing to do is to have an orientation of hope. We shall not rest till the very last day when we have victory in our hands on December 8. It’s a year where our collective efforts is going to win us the seat after 12 years of subjectiving the Constituency to ‘slavery’ under NDC” Hon. Ransford Kwesi Nyarko ,DCE of Ajumako Enyan Essiam District, declared.
Outgoing Chairman,Mr Victor Buabeng who’s been nominated as V20 coordinator for election 2020 assured the team of his continuous support. “We did it together and we are doing it again this year. We are the ones to preach the truth to render useless the unmatched lies of NDC. Yes, together we shall fight a battle of ideas in order to win the seat” Policies are what drive every election campaign and I am pretty sure we have done enough for the good people of the Constituency to reward us with a massive win both Parliamentary and presidential.
According to the group, they’re not in any competition with the NDC. How can we compete with liars , propagandists, vision free and stomach politicians in the NDC?
Other executives include;
Mr Kojo Fosu.
Our revolution scheme is on course and come what may, victory will be ours” they chanted.
Abraham Papa AYESU
Communicator- V20 Patriots.


Iron Ore Crushing,Primary Crusher,Secondary Crusher,Iron Ore Secondary Crusher. Secondary Crusher is crusher that is used in primary crushing process ie gyratory or cone crusher , impact crusher. Impact crusher used for the broken Company, Inc. California Crushing New Thinking About Primary and Secondary Crushing Saves West Coast.
Crusher Mills, Cone Crusher, iron ore primary secondary and tertiary crusher GET . GET . occupation primary secondary tertiary - Gold Ore Crusher. Problem or solution A secondary teacher training initiative for a new era. Free Online Library. Even then graduates who took the one-year course spent part of.
According to the category and characteristic of ore, there are many different processes for iron ore dressing. In general, ore dressing plant may use primary, secondary and tertiary crushing processes for crushing iron ore. Jaw crusher is usually used for primary crushing cone crusher is used for secondary and tertiary crushing.
According to different final products applications, varioustypes of crusher equipment are required, such as jaw crusher for primary crushing, impact crusher and hammer crusher for secondary crushing, cone crusher for secondary and tertiary crushing. Iron ore crusher prices are different according to crusher types and production capacities.
In Mineral Processing Design and Operations (Second Edition), 2016. 5.1 Introduction. Gyratory crushers were invented by Charles Brown in 1877 and developed by Gates around 1881 and were referred to as a Gates crusher .The smaller form is described as a cone crusher. The larger crushers are normally known as primary crushers as they are designed to receive run-on-mine (ROM) rocks.
In general, ore dressing plant may use primary, secondary and tertiary crushing processes for crushing iron ore. Jaw crusher is usually used for primary crushing cone crusher is used for secondary and tertiary crushing. Through primary crushing, and then by secondary and tertiary crushing, ore will be crushed to the suitable size for feeding.
Iron Ore Secondary. iron ore secondary crusher Feldspar iron ore secondary crusher TY excellent mining crushing machinery products or production line design, the company is committed to building the Chinese brand mine . iron ore Search Results China Daily.
China Fine Type Jaw Crusher Secondary Crushing for Pebble, Iron Ore, River Stone (PEX300X1300 PEX1252), Find details about China Fine Jaw Crusher, Iron Ore Crusher from Fine Type Jaw Crusher Secondary Crushing for Pebble, Iron Ore, River Stone (PEX300X1300 PEX1252) - Shanghai Kinglink Industry .
Jaw crusher,Jaw crushers,Primary crushers,Jaw breakers,Mobile . The Jaw crusher is used for Primary crushers and Secondary crushers for crushing all kinds of minerals and rocks with compressive strength less than 320 mpa. There .
Iron Ore Primary Crusher Henan Mining Machinery. Iron Ore Crusher Machine. Being the primary crusher machine the jaw iron ore crusher can break large scale iron ore into small pieces In the secondary crushing stage impact crusher and cone crusher will be able to work According to the specific design impact crusher is much suitable for breaking soft and medium hard iron ore.
Iron ore occurs naturally in a variety of forms, from sand-like iron fines to solid rock masses. Crude ore, or ore mined in the natural state, seldom occurs in a pure state and requires some form using conveyors to transport the crushed ore to the secondary and tertiary crushers or directly to the mills. The crushing stages will reduce the iron.
Iron Ore Crusher, Iron ore crushing machine, Iron. 2014812Iron ore crushing The extracted iron ore will be transported to the primary crusher Oversized and wet ore will be sent to the ROM stockpile for pretreatment before it is sent to the primary crusher Primary and secondary crushing followed by screening will result in lumps and fines sized between 32mm +8mm and 8mm respectively.
Large iron ore is sent to the jaw crusher or mobile jaw crusher for coarse crushing by the vibrating feeder. The coarsely-crushed iron ore is sieved by the vibrating screen and sent by the belt conveyor and secondary crushed by single-cylinder hydraulic cone crusher the crushed iron ore material is fed into HP Series multi-cylinder hydraulic.
Iron ore crushing The extracted iron ore will be transported to the primary crusher Oversized and wet ore will be sent to the ROM stockpile for pretreatment before it is sent to the primary crusher Primary and secondary crushing followed by screening will result in.
Primary Crusher For Iron Ore. Iron Ore Primary Crusher Or 15m The Beneficiation Techniques for 5 Types of Iron Ores ensp 0183 ensp Magnetite iron ore processing flowsheetwet magnetic separation process 1 Iron ore is sent into the jaw crusher for primary crushing and then sent into the vibrating screen for screening and the mesh size is controlled in the range of 35 mm to 75 mm The materials on.
700tph Iron Ore Crushing Plant . 300-400tph limestone mobile crusher production plant . 100tph mobile pebble cone crusher . In mining industry, with primary and secondary crushers handling coarse materials, and tertiary and quaternary crushers reducing ore particles to finer gradations.
Iron Ore Crusher Market Insights, Trends, Competitive Analysis, By Product Type(Primary Crushing, Secondary Crushing, Fine Crushing), By End User Application(Mine, Construction, Others) – Global Forecast to 2020-2025.
Secondary applications are dependent on the primary crusher to provide a targeted feed size, so fluctuations in the run-of-mine (ROM) ore can contribute considerably. Changes in gradation (i.e., feed getting coarser or finer), hardness, moisture or, if the work index increases or decreases, can trigger adjustments in screen panels as well as.
Aug 08, 2019 For high-hardness iron ore, a cone crusher can be used for the secondary crushing equipment. The HXJQ short-headed cone crusher can achieve a fine crushing effect of 3 to 13mm, which can fully meet the requirements of dry selection and grinding.
And then, send the crushed iron ore into cone crusher for secondary crushing. Vibrating Screen is used to separate materials into different sizes. The size which meets the requirement will be transported into the grinding mill for further process, while the rest part will be returned to cone crusher.
The crusher will reduce the ore size from -750mm to -150mm at a rate of 500 tonnes per hour (tph) of ROM ore. The crushed ore from the primary crusher will be fed to the secondary crusher. The cone crushers will be designed to maximise lump production over fines. The material will be transported to a triple-deck screen that will separate the.
Dec 26, 2015 In mineral processing or metallurgy, the first stage of comminution is crushing Depending of the type of rock (geometallurgy) to be crushed, there are 2 largely different techniques at your disposition for crushing rocks. In principle, compression crushing is used on hard and abrasive rocks by placing them between a high wear-resistant plate surface.
CI5X Impact Crusher. To satisfy users' requirements for high profits, low costs, and energy saving, and to overcome the shortcomings of conventional crushing equipment such as complex operation procedures and low crushing efficiency, ASM has developed the new generation of high-efficiency coarse and medium-fine crushing machine – CI5X Impact Crusher.
Iron ore is the key raw material for steel production enterprises. Generally, iron ore with a grade of less than 50 needs to be processed before smelting and utilization. After crushing, grinding, magnetic separation, flotation, and gravity separation, etc., iron is gradually selected from the natural iron ore.


text:
Betrayal Broke Them Once...
We can't afford to indulge in this attraction, but our connection burns too brightly to ignore.
My husband was the second man who betrayed my trust when he left me alone to raise my daughter. Asher was the first. I found solace from both in my novels, writing about the hero I'd lost. But in those bestselling books, Asher-I mean my hero-didn't shatter my heart the way he had in real life.
There were so many things I couldn't say to Dahlia when she was seventeen. But I've never forgotten the only girl I ever loved. My voice and song-writing talent made me a star. Fame extracted its price. Now I have another chance—the chance to restore her faith in love. The chance to find it for myself.
I'm not letting Dahlia go now that I have her in my arms again.
Perfect for fans of the Kendall Ryan, Carly Phillips, and A. L. Jackson, Sweet Solace and its sequels take readers on an emotional, sexy journey of hot men and their feisty women who are transformed by courage, self-sacrifice, and love.
Praise for Sweet Solace:
"A lovely start to the Seattle Sound series, Sweet Solace immerses the reader in a bittersweet romance between two caring souls. Alexa has injected so much passion and feeling between these two characters that you find yourself wanting more of Asher and Dahlia by the time you get to the end of the book. That's how good her storytelling is." ~ Lisette, book blogger and author
Customer ReviewsSee All
Not your typical second chance romance where some misunderstanding splits the hero and heroine and chance brings them back together. Asher and Dahlia loved each other from afar, were each unavailable to the other and then by chance met again each carrying boatloads of baggage. How they work thru that baggage is the central story line. This book is romantic and heart wrenching and ultimately there is a happy ending for the romance writer and the song writer. The supporting cast is fantastic, especially sassy teenager Abbi. Thank you for the atypical second chance romance and the atypical rock star romance. I read this in a day because I just couldn't stop.
Title: Sweet Solace
Review: Loved this book.

domain: artistic


text:
Let’s continue from part 1. The next type of water filter media I’ll discuss is known as Kinetic Degradation Fluxion®(KDF). This is a patented technology that works by way of biochemical reactions known as oxidation and reduction (or redox) using a copper-zinc media. Essentially, it works via either copper or zinc transferring one or more electrons to the toxin, in turn causing a chemical reaction that converts the toxin into a different non-toxic compound. For example, when KDF contacts chlorine, the zinc loses one electron (oxidation) and the chlorine gains one electron (reduction). As a result, potentially toxic chlorine gets reduced to non-toxic chloride ions. Generally, KDF is used in conjunction with another type of filter, often activated carbon. In addition to chlorine, KDF helps “filter” (really oxidize or reduce) iron; hydrogen sulfide (toxic and has a bad sulfur/rotten egg odor); metals (lead, mercury, copper, nickel, chromium, and other positively-charged metals); and it may also control bacteria, algae, and fungi growth (which is why it’s often used with carbon filters that “trap” and may colonize bacteria).
Now I’ll talk about another type of water purifier called reverse osmosis. This works by forcing the water through a semi-permeable membrane while leaving the contaminants behind. This system requires pressure to push the water through. That’s why it’s called “reverse osmosis”, because osmosis occurs when natural movement causes a solvent to move from an area of low concentration to an area of high concentration. Reverse osmosis is fantastic at removing many different types of contaminants. However, it should be combined with a type of sediment pre-filter and carbon filter because some contaminants (that the others can remove first) can clog or degrade the membrane. OK, so here’s the list of things reverse osmosis can filter: aluminum, arsenic, barium, cadmium, chloride, chromium, copper, fluoride, magnesium, iron, lead, manganese, mercury, nitrate, selenium, silver, sulfate, zinc, asbestos, chemicals (that cause bad tastes, color, and odor), particulates, general turbidity (or cloudiness from particles), radium, bacteria, viruses, salts, sugars, proteins, dyes, volatile organic compounds, and chlorine and its by-products. I’m sure there are some others that I may have missed. Now think about combining that with an activated carbon filter. Three important caveats: 1) bacteria and viruses can still accumulate and also degrade the membrane; 2) by removing minerals the water becomes acidic, meaning it will have a pH below 7 (our blood is between 7.35-7.45) – however high quality salt can be added to raise the pH, more on pH and why consuming alkaline-forming foods and drinks is extremely important for health in another article; and 3) it wastes A LOT of water – at least 3-5x the amount of original water that is filtered for drinking, is wasted.
Ok let’s move on. What do we do about all these bacteria, viruses, parasites, cysts, algae, fungi, and other microorganisms that can be in our water. Chlorine will not always kill everything. And there’s even chlorine-resistant bacteria out there. For these bugs, the best way to kill them is none other than light – ultraviolet light (UV) to be specific. The UV light damages the organisms DNA, making it’s cells incapable of reproducing/dividing – thus making it harmless or killing it. Simple as that! Hmmm, wouldn’t that solve the problem of having to add chlorine to water (which causes the production of toxic by-products). Of course it would, and ozone (a molecule with 3 oxygen atoms) is another alternative for the job. Apparently, there are “more than 400 municipal water treatment ozone systems operating in the U.S. alone.” BY THE WAY, for those of us in NYC – this option (of UV light) has been reported about in 2005, though I don’t know what sort of progress has been made.
Let’s finish with one more – ceramic filters. These use porous ceramic to literally filter the water through, while leaving the contaminants behind. They are especially known for filtering microorganisms, and the US Environmental Protection Agency has even created standards for their effectiveness. Search Google™ for “US EPA Guide Standard and Protocol for Testing Microbiological Water Purifiers” for their report. So if you get a ceramic filter, make sure it’s stamped with their approval. These filters most notably remove parasites and bacteria. It will certainly filter large sediment (that can’t pass through the pores) as well. However, some manufacturers of ceramic filters are certified to be effective in removing chlorine, lead, turbidity and particulates, and bad taste and odor. Additionally, these can be cleaned by hand when they clog up – but be VERY careful as simply handing it can clog the pores, rendering them less effective. They can also break, or get hairline cracks, which will cause particles to pass right through into your drinking water. Follow the instructions very closely.
Wait, really the last – distillation is by far the best way to remove most (and perhaps all) contaminants that can possibly exist. The water is basically boiled and the steam is collected which is then converted back to liquid for use. The contaminants are left behind, not emitted in the steam. However, that doesn’t mean it produces the best water. Some people say it can act as a vacuum and draw minerals out of the body. I haven’t been able to verify that yet.
distilled spring or purified
And, Dr. Masaru Emoto has taken pictures of water from a “pure source” and distilled water. No comment – see the pictures and make your own judgment please. By the way, it’s quite tedious and energy consuming to distill water at home. SmartWater® is distilled, although it has some minerals added back into it. I like that it’s definitely “clean”.
On fluoride — some companies talk about a separate fluoride-removal filter, but fail to disclose the mechanism it uses.
There are some links at the end of the article if you’re interested in buying a water filter. I have no financial connection with any of the companies – although I signed up as a “dealer” with EcoQuest® last year. I haven’t renewed my membership this year, but probably will. It cost me $25 to become a dealer, which saved me around $100 on the filter (Living Water 3® with a fluoride and arsenic pre-filter).
If I were you, I would speak with the companies first to make sure the filter meets your needs. And you may want to call your local municipality to see if they add fluoride to the water – and see if, maybe (hopefully) they use UV light or ozone as a chlorine alternative.
I’m sure there are many more – I just happen to come upon these that “looked good”.
PS – don’t forget a showerhead filter!
Dr. Robert D’Aquila – NYC Chiropractor – Applied Kinesiologist

domain: chemistry