text:
Yahoo!’s CEO, Marissa Mayer might be known for the 20 startups the conglomerate acquired since over a year ago. However, let’s not forget its firm grip across the globe – in Japan.
According to SD Japan, Yahoo! Japan announced last week that it has acquired local e-commerce group, Venture Republic for an undisclosed amount. This comes after news of it buying over Japanese startup Bluem, which operates Dreampass, an on-demand cinema service in March. Last year, we also reported about its partnering up with GREE, a global mobile social gaming network, and acquiring Community Factory for about US$12.8 million.
Run by CEO Kei Shibata, Venture Republic has been known for its investments in two startups, namely Indonesia-based Telunjuk and Singapore-based Flocations. Interestingly, Telunjuk, a price comparison site, pitched at e27’s Indonesia Satellite earlier this year, and Flocations, a travel booking site, did the same in Singapore the previous year.
Read also: The curious case of Flocations’ pivot
Unsurprisingly so, Venture Republic is also an online portal provider in the travel e-commerce vertical. It offers its services to startups and companies in this space, such as Travel.jp, Hotel.jp and Coneco.net.
Going forward, while the “equity of the comparison shopping business has been acquired by Yahoo! Japan”, Venture Republic will be “bringing the whole team who has been running Coneco.net to the new entity”.
UPDATE: Kei shared via email:
“While our travel business (Travel.jp and Hotel.jp – travel meta search, hotel reviews and destination guide) stays fully independent, the equity of our comparison shopping business is acquired by Yahoo! Japan this time to accelerate the growth. Under the Yahoo! Japan group, the new company Ocenyc Inc. will be led by Kenichi Shibata, co-founder & COO of Venture Republic and the operation will be run by the whole team who has been running coneco.net.”
Travel e-commerce space in Japan is the second largest in market size after shopping and keeps growing constantly. Japan has (arguably) the second largest travel market in the world after the U.S. and the new government eyes on it in its new growth strategy.”
The move will also see users have more flexibility in terms of web search and other Yahoo! services. Kei also said that there will be more details on how this acquisition will bring value to their users soon. He views the travel e-commerce scene in Japan as “promising and exciting”.
Featured Image Credit: Shutterstock

domain: geography


text:
Human supplements of all kinds are now apart of daily life from multivitamins to specialty supplements that are designed to support specific bodily functions. Does that mean you should also add a supplement to your pet’s daily ration of food to keep them healthy? If it’s good for you then why should your furry companion miss out.
Once you have chosen a diet that is ideal for your doggos age and lifestyle, there are supplements that you can consider adding based on the particular health needs of your dog. You should always first discuss with your veterinarian or nutritionist any supplements that you are considering giving to your doggo. This will ensure there are no complications or health concerns with other medications you are giving or medical conditions your dog may have.
Each and every nutrient in your dog’s diet has a purpose. Without adequate nutrition, your dog would not be able to maintain good muscle tone, build and repair those muscles, teeth, bones, whilst going about their normal daily activities with ease or fight-off infection and illness. Proteins provide a source of energy and help with muscle function and growth. Fats provide energy, help the brain function, and keep the skin and hair coat shiny and healthy. Carbohydrates supply a source of quick energy that allow your doggo to be active and energetic. Vitamins and minerals work to prevent disease and are necessary for muscles and nerves.
One example is the supplementation of glucosamine and chondroitin commonly found together in shark cartilage that help protect the joints to prevent or slow the progression of arthritis. They work to increase lubrication within the joint as well as repair cartilage, whilst they will not eliminate arthritis or correct any structural abnormalities these essential supplements can help support the joint function and introduced early in your doggo’s diet is a sure way to ward off any problems in later life.
Another widely used dietary supplement that has many functions and is a great additive to many foods is omega-3 fatty acids such as those found in fish or hemp oil. Omega-3 fatty acids are a powerful anti-inflammatory for the skin and joints and can help support the function of several organs.
Several studies have shown that antioxidants such as vitamins C and E will protect and repair a dog’s brain cells. Supplements containing compounds that maintain good brain function with high levels of antioxidants protect a dog’s aging brain and are a good choice if you notice your older doggo is slowing down.
A high quality, complete and balanced diet formulated and supplemented for your dog’s specific age and lifestyle will meet all the essential nutrients to maintain optimal health. Additional supplements that address certain medical or dietary issues may improve the health of your doggo however, it is always best to first discuss any concerns with your vet or nutritionist and get their recommendations for supplements your doggo may benefit from.
Providing Essential Nutrients
Your dog’s diet might need a lift to provide the essential vitamins and nutrients. While fats and carbohydrates are a basic part of dog food, vitamins, minerals, and fatty acids can be lost during the manufacturing process just like when we overcook vegetables.Holistic vets recommend supplementing with vital ingredients to boost both the efficiency of your dog’s food and replace any missing nutrients. But be careful not to overload your pet with unnecessary ingredients—the best vitamins will replenish and support with maximum efficiency even in the smallest of doses.
Kickstart the immune system
A balanced, robust immune system reduces your dog’s risk of several ailments such as heart disease, inflammation, arthritis, and diabetes. A dog’s body will automatically regulate cells to make sure they’re working properly while eliminating potentially harmful pathogens before they become an issue. However, even a minor glitch in the process can open the door to a host of health problems.Supplements can make sure the immune system is balanced and healthy to ward off an attack. Along with a balanced diet and regular exercise, vitamins with high-quality ingredients will increase your doggos ability to fight illness throughout their life.
Skin and CoatAn issue and often distressing problem for many dogs is irritated or hot skin and hair loss. Several external influences can be the cause of an irritation, a supplement specific to your doggos coat can prevent the onset or spread of a problem. Introducing supplements or shampoos that include oils and minerals can replenish your dog’s immunity that fight common problems:
- Bacterial or fungal infections
- Surface and airborne allergies
- High hair loss or shedding
- Dry and itchy skin
Introducing your doggo to a nutritional supplement can improve their functionality over time. The best supplements will include antioxidants, minerals, protein, and enzymes which all have been linked to improving wellbeing.
Supplements particularly those found in fish can make a long-term difference in overall health inside and out.
Shrimp is packed full of nutrients, antioxidants, low in fat and carbs
Abalone containing a rich source of antioxidants and calcium
Adding supplements or switching to an additive-rich diet, can only enhance a proper nutrition that is suited to your doggos stage of life whilst helping to support and positively influence the aging process. Your doggos diet is a critical part of enhancing and maintaining their overall wellbeing as they grow and enter senior years.

domain: medical


text:
Title X funds organizations offering family planning services, such as birth control and pregnancy tests, to low-income women and men, but has always been criticized by conservatives for its relationship with Planned Parenthood and its treatment of abortion.
The administration says counseling about an abortion would be OK, but referrals would not.
If this sounds familiar, it's because Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump made precisely the same suggestion to then-Planned Parenthood president Cecile Richards after they requested a meeting with her to discuss federal funding for the organization, as she recalled in her recent memoir. This is the second time Trump has taken steps to revoke taxpayer funding for the nation's biggest abortion business - after yanking taxpayer from from International Planned Parenthood during his first week in office.
Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J. Clinics receiving Title X funds also would be required to keep records of "specific actions taken" to encourage family participation in a minor seeking family planning services unless it's suspected that the minor is a victim of sexual abuse.
The poll on the "Protect Life Rule" was conducted by McLaughlin & Associates. "I think the same thing is happening with the Planned Parenthood clinics". This includes the International Planned Parenthood Federation, which received tax dollars under the Obama administration. "No matter what. They won't get it under this rule", Languens explains.
Laguens asserts that Planned Parenthood will continue to fight for reproductive justice: "Planned Parenthood will not stop fighting for our patients".
"In a conservative political state, Planned Parenthood is not going to be able to build the same grassroots structure that has out-worked them politically and legislatively for decades", she said.
In defunding Planned Parenthood alone, Republicans took away preventative care, reproductive services and maternity coverage that almost 15,000 Iowans relied on.
The United States spends about $260 million in Title X funds annually for family planning for low-income individuals, and Planned Parenthood is a huge recipient of those funds, as much as $50-$60 million annually.
The proposal, which was originally expected to come on Friday, was released on Tuesday in advance of the Susan B. Anthony List's Campaign for Life Gala, at which Donald Trump will deliver the keynote address.
The restrictions are just the latest anti-abortion issue tackled by Trump, whom advocates often describe as the most "pro-life president in history".
The proposal comes amid strong pleas from grassroots Americans and members of Congress to defund the abortion giant Planned Parenthood.
Messengers to the 2017 SBC meeting adopted a resolution calling for defunding of Planned Parenthood at all levels of government and denouncing the organization's "immoral agenda and practices".
Other undercover investigations by pro-life organizations in the last several years have shown Planned Parenthood employees demonstrating a willingness to aid self-professed sex traffickers whose prostitutes supposedly were in their early teens, seeking to hide alleged child sex abuse and agreeing to receive donations designated for abortions of African American babies.
Currently, Planned Parenthood of the Heartland is a two-state affiliate overseen by a leadership team in Iowa. Similar regulations were upheld by the Supreme Court in 1991 in Rust v. Sullivan (500 USA 173).
- Musk says the Tesla Model 3 is fast, very fast
- US Threatens Iran With the 'Strongest Sanctions in History'
- Explosion kills 16 in Afghan city of Kandahar
- Stoke in talks to appoint Gary Rowett of Derby as new manager
- Kane Williamson's Sunrisers Hyderabad fall in IPL preliminary final
- Strange Behavior: 'Something Wrong' With Killer Cougar
- Israel launches world's FIRST strikes with 1200mph supersonic F-35 fighter jets
- If You Missed The California Voter Registration Deadline, There's Another Option
- Russian Federation calls for foreign troop pullout from Syria including Iran, Hezbollah
- Gov. Greg Abbott cancels shotgun giveaway after Santa Fe shooting

domain: news


text:
U.S. stock futures were poised for a second day of gains, following the official announcement of a debt and spending deal by the White House and congressional leaders.Morning Briefread more
Coca-Cola topped Wall Street's expectations for earnings and revenue.Food & Beverageread more
Boris Johnson, one of the biggest voices in the Brexit movement, won the Conservative Party leadership race on Tuesday.Europe Politicsread more
U.S. stock index futures were higher Tuesday morning after results from major companies topped expectations.US Marketsread more
Iran is pushing boundaries amid rising tensions in the Gulf, but President Trump has so far not been "compelled" to retaliate militarily, analysts say.World Politicsread more
The largest residential brokerage company in the U.S. is partnering with the largest online retailer in a strategy to boost sales for both.Real Estateread more
Two traders say Boeing's on the path to recovery.Trading Nationread more
The Trump administration on Tuesday will propose a rule to tighten food stamp restrictions that would cut about 3.1 million people from the program, U.S. Department of...Politicsread more
Boris Johnson is to be the U.K.'s next prime minister but the charismatic and controversial figure will already divides the party and British public alike.Europe Politicsread more
The deal could be announced as soon as next week, according to the report.Technologyread more
The deal between the White House and Democrats was earlier expected to raise the debt ceiling for two years and permanently end the sequester.Politicsread more
Investors should give IBM the benefit of the doubt as it transitions from its old business model, CNBC's Jim Cramer said Wednesday.
Shares of Dow component IBM were 4 percent lower on Wednesday after the iconic tech firm reported its 21st-straight quarter of revenue decline.
But Cramer said many on Wall Street are misguided on how fast IBM has to change, especially when it faces stiff competition.
IBM has struggled during the past five years to grow revenues as it transitions from traditional business tools, like mainframes, to new fields like artificial intelligence, cybersecurity and cloud.
The company faces competition from Amazon Web Services, the world's biggest cloud business. Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos said earlier this year his company plans to embrace artificial intelligence to fuel its businesses. Wall Street has also been abuzz about Amazon after it announced its plan to buy Whole Foods, and what that means for the grocery and meal-kit delivery industry.
Regarding IBM's growth, Cramer said a lot of the initiatives the company is doing have not "kicked in yet, so the stock has not kicked in yet." He added, "IBM is really burdened by the old business. And the new business — they're up against these amazing companies."
"It takes so long to remake an organization when you're up against Amazon, when you're up against [Google-parent] Alphabet, when you're up against Microsoft. These are competitors the likes of which IBM has never seen before, " he said.

domain: politics


Safe Carpet Cleaning For Your Carpets,Upholstery and Area Rugs: Carpet Cleaning Castle Rock Co
TLC Carpet Care In Castle Rock Co is a family-owned business with 18 years of experience in the carpet & upholstery cleaning and flood restoration industry.
At TLC Carpet Care we use Pro-Chems state of the art truck-mounted carpet cleaning machines and 100% non toxic, environmentally safe carpet cleaning chemicals to deep-clean all types of carpets, area rugs and upholstery fabrics.
TLC Carpet Care provides many areas of services - whether your carpets or upholstery require steam extraction, dry solvent cleaning, or pet stain and odor treatments. TLC treats every job with the respect and time that our clients deserve - We give our clients options with all our carpet cleaning methods and the different methods for different fabrics and carpets that people have in their home. TLC will recommend how clean your carpets and upholstery fibers will be after using each one of those fibers and we'll test for color fastness as well.
If you are not completely happy with the carpet cleaning service you receive from TLC Carpet Care, we will rush back to your location as soon as possible and at no additional charge re-clean those areas.. If you are still unhappy, we will refund 100% of your money.
TLC Carpet Care in castle Rock Co uses only professional IICRC certified carpet cleaning technicians and friendly office staff to provide you with the best over all service. Cleaning your carpets will promote extended life to your carpets, rugs, and upholstery and provide a more healthy environment to your home or office.
TLC Carpet Care welcomes you to visit our web site at tlccarpetcare.net and we thank you in advance for trusting is us for all of your carpet and upholstery cleaning needs.
For more info on Safe Carpet Cleaning For Your Carpets, Upholstery and Area Rugs call TLC Carpet Care at 720.314.0178


text:
Dedicated to the Preservation of the Art of Leathercraft
Here at Learning Leathercraft we strive to preserve the tradition of the art of Leathercraft.
These days machines can do just about anything and we humans are quickly losing many of the skills that we spent centuries perfecting.
It is the goal of these courses to have you walk out the door with a beautifully hand crafted piece of leather work that with proper care and attention, will last you a lifetime.
A bit of cutting,
A Wide Selection of Courses
Come and learn how to turn a few pieces of leather into a beautiful finished piece using only your hands and a few choice tools.
A bit of hammering,
Bringing Leather to Life
Get lost in the process of leather carving and bring two dimensional artwork into the third dimension.
A beautiful result.
Coming to a Venue near you
Classes will be held on a regular basis at city center venues all over the country, come and join us!

domain: artistic


text:
Registration opens for Iowa exercise program
Registration opens Monday for “The Next Step Challenge” – an initiative by Live Healthy Iowa to promote physical activity for adults of all ages.
For a $10 registration fee, entrants receive a pedometer to measure how many steps your team takes between Sept. 12 and Oct. 21, access to a personal tracking page, healthy recipes and more. Groups can range from two people to 10, and team captains can register at LiveHealthyIowa.org.
The “Challenge” began in 2011 and participation averages nearly 5,000 adults per year. Annually, more than 1.3 billion steps are taken in the program.
Businesses can establish a group/organization ID, allowing multiple teams to register. For more information, e-mail email@example.com or call (888) 777-8881.


text:
CM Shahbaz Sharif responds to the US Defence Secretary statement
LAHORE: Chief Minister Punjab Muhammad Shehbaz Sharif has said that an initiative like One Belt One Road (OBOR) and China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), which aims to end poverty of over 800 million people through shared prosperity, should be welcomed and not rejected by a developed country like the USA.
He said in a statement that ill-founded opposition aimed at creating uncertainty about the grand project was no service to the global peace and development. He said poverty, inequality and underdevelopment were shared challenges of the whole South Asia, adding that OBOR and CPEC promise to address these questions by creating a community of shared prosperity.
He said it is important to avoid raising doubts about these global initiatives that seek empowerment of the people.Highlighting the significance of the OBOR initiative, CM Shehbaz Sharif recalled the Chinese president's reiteration at the recent OBOR summit that the OBOR aims at harmonious coexistence without any geopolitical agenda.
"It is highly unfair to label OBOR as isolationist or with any peculiar agenda and global powers should encourage its development by resolving any regional disputes in its way," he opined.The chief minister dismissed the US defence secretary's apprehensions about OBOR and CPEC and termed these initiatives of China to share knowledge, resources and prosperity with 65 countries in Asia, Europe and Africa as "highly commendable".
Shehbaz Sharif explained that ever since the launch of OBOR, the total trade between China and other Belt and Road countries during 2014-2016 had exceeded US$3 trillion, Chinese investments in the OBOR countries had exceeded US$50 billion and China's total investment under OBOR initiative is envisaged at over US$1 trillion.
He said that CPEC alone was worth over US$60 billion and was estimated to exceed US$100 billion. "Already around 2000-MW electricity under CPEC had been added to the national grid in Pakistan and a total of 19 projects are at different stages of speedy completion including the modern mass transit train system, called the Orange Line," he explained.
The CM Punjab further said that OBOR was now a global reality that was well and truly underway with formal cooperation between over 100 countries and international organisations, which attended the OBOR summit this year including the USA. He said that important resolutions passed by the UN General Assembly and Security Council contain reference to OBOR and the Chinese president in his OBOR summit speech this year had held that OBOR was open to all countries and had invited countries from Asia, Europe and Americas to participate in it.
"This global initiative aimed at economic uplift of all countries should be applauded and facilitated rather than criticised and rejected," he urged.The CM said that the people of Pakistan and all elements of national opinion had complete and unwavering consensus on the CPEC being a game-changer for Pakistan's economy and polity.
He said that the whole nation was ready to foil any conspiracy against this project of vital significance with the power of unity. Shehbaz terms OBOR vital for shared development outcomes.

domain: sociology


text:
by Eva Dean Folkert
Forward Francesca Buchanan, pictured, had a big presence early on in Saturday's Hope vs. Calvin Rivalry women's basketball game, but when the fourth quarter rolled around, she became somewhat larger than life. The senior from Grant (Sparta HS) dominated the final quarter for the Flying Dutch, scoring 10 of her game-high 25 points, and thus half of her team's score, in leading No.9-ranked Hope to a 50-38 win over the Knights at Van Noord Arena.
It was Buchanan's second consecutive double-double as she also pulled down 13 rebounds on Saturday. Her 25 points came on shooting 67 percent from the floor (12-18). It was the most points and rebounds Buchanan has totaled against the Knights in her career.
"There's something about being a senior (in this rivalry)," said head coach Brian Morehouse. "You either run to the moment, or you run away from the moment in the Hope-Calvin game. You're either afraid to lose one of your last games against a big rival, or you refuse to lose one of your last games to your rival. And I thought that Frankie ran to the challenge today from the very beginning. . . I mean that will go down as one of the great games that we've had a post player play against Calvin."
"I did not want to lose," said Buchanan of her mindset in second half. "There was no part of me that wanted to go home and ride the bus thinking we could have won. They had a couple of runs here and there, and I was like, we are not losing this game."
The game was marked by fits and starts of offense for both teams. Every point was precious to score as pressure defense forced shots and errors on both ends of the floor. Hope allowed the fewest points to Calvin since a 59-36 win in 2000. And the Flying Dutch's 50-point total was their lowest offensive output of the season.
"We didn't shoot it well (30.6 percent); they didn't shoot it well (22.8%)," admitted Morehouse. "One of my assistant coaches likened it to a rock fight where two teams were just throwing rocks at the rim and they were bouncing off."
But as the Flying Dutch took at 39-31 lead into the fourth quarter, Buchanan asserted herself as a driving force to the basket. She powered in five layups in a row, accounting for 10 of Hope's final 11 points. Those baskets drove more separation between the Flying Dutch and the Knights and extended Hope's lead to its largest of the game at the final buzzer.
"I do think that we did a very good job rebounding," Morehouse added about the Flying Dutch's eight-rebound advantage (52-44). "That was a huge emphasis for us heading into this week, actually heading into the last two weeks. We did a nice job on that and I think it's one of the big reasons that we won the game."
Sophomore Kenedy Schoonveld of Zeeland (Holland Christian HS) was Hope's second leading scorer with seven points. The rest of her stat line displayed a well-rounded game for the guard who also had 10 rebounds, three assists, three steals and only two turnovers.
Sophomore center Olivia Voskuil of Holland (Holland Christian HS) also had a balanced game, chipping in six points, making three assists, grabbing nine rebounds and blocking five Calvin shots.
Calvin was led by freshman Gabby Timmer, who also had a double-double with 16 points and 13 rebounds.
The Flying Dutch (14-2 overall, 6-1 MIAA) improved to 36-15 against Calvin since 2000. The Knights (8-8, 3-4 MIAA) lead the all-time Rivalry series, 71-51.
The Flying Dutch host Saint Mary's College on Wednesday, January 16 at 7:30 p.m. at DeVos Fieldhouse. Tipoff is at 7:30 p.m.

domain: sports


text:
Terrydale Liquidating Trust v. Barness, 642 F. Supp. 917 (S.D.N.Y. 1986)
August 26, 1986
Herbert BARNESS, et al., Defendants.
SAN FRANCISCO REAL ESTATE INVESTORS, INC., Counterclaimant and Third-Party Plaintiff,
TERRYDALE LIQUIDATING TRUST, et al., Counterdefendants and Third Party Defendants.
United States District Court, S.D. New York.
Leventritt, Lewittes & Bender, Garden City, N.Y., for plaintiff; Sidney Bender, Aaron Lewittes, Janine L. Bender, of counsel.
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom, New York City, for defendants; Douglas M. Kraus, Erskine D. Henderson, Barry H. Garfinkel, Mitchell C. Sockett, of counsel.
*918 SAND, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Terrydale Liquidating Trust ("TLT"), a New York business trust that is the successor in interest to Terrydale Realty Trust ("TRT"), brought an action against San Francisco Real Estate Investors, Inc. ("SFREI") and the individual trustees of San Francisco Real Estate Investors, seeking to hold them liable as aiders and abettors of an alleged breach of fiduciary duty and as constructive trustees of property allegedly sold to them in violation of the seller's fiduciary duties and Declaration of Trust. On November 19, 1984, this Court granted defendants' motion for summary judgment in part and dismissed the claim that they were aiders and abettors of said breach. Terrydale Liquidating Trust v. Barness, 611 F. Supp. 1006 (S.D.N.Y.1984) (hereinafter "Terrydale"). Both defendants' and plaintiff's motions for summary judgment as to plaintiff's equitable claim for restitution were denied, however, because material questions of fact existed as to whether there was a breach of fiduciary obligation or Declaration of Trust and, if so, whether defendants had sufficient notice thereby such that they held the acquired assets as constructive trustees for plaintiff's benefit. Id. at 1012. On June 10, 1986, the action proceeded to trial. For the reasons stated below, we find that plaintiff also has failed to establish any liability on defendants' part with respect to plaintiff's claim for equitable restitution.
This case presents, with some significant variations, what has become a common phenomenon in the securities field: efforts by management to resist and defeat hostile takeovers by enlisting the aid of a "white knight" or other inhibitory tactics. Here, the significant variations relate to both the nature of the target and the relief sought as well as the role defendants played in the subject transaction. First, the target was a Missouri Real Estate Investment Trust ("REIT") which, under relevant IRS provisions, would have lost its preferred tax status and other benefits if five or fewer of its shareholders owned 50% of its stock. Second, having settled its claims against the target's trustees and having had its claims for other relief dismissed, plaintiff now seeks to impose upon the white knightthe entity that purchased most of its assetsa constructive trusteeship over those assets for the benefit of the target's shareholders. Plaintiff premises this claim on a theory that the purchaser knew or should have known that the sale constituted a breach of the TRT Declaration of Trust and of the target's trustees' fiduciary obligation to the target's shareholders. Plaintiff has succeeded in establishing that this Court has personal jurisdiction over the defendants and subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiff's claim for equitable restitution.
The facts underlying this litigation and its complex procedural history already have been articulated in several prior opinions. See Terrydale, 611 F.Supp. at 1012-1014; see also Terrydale Liquidating Trust v. Gramlich, 549 F. Supp. 529 (S.D.N.Y.1982); Bolton v. Gramlich, 540 F. Supp. 822, 827-30 (S.D.N.Y.1982). Familiarity with these prior opinions shall be assumed and the facts will be restated only to the extent necessary to set forth our findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to F.R. Civ.P. 52(a).
Briefly, BCG Associates (hereinafter "BCG"), a New York limited partnership, commenced an unsolicited tender offer for 160,000 TRT shares at a price of $33.50 per share. If successful, the offer would have given BCG virtual majority ownership of TRT. The TRT trustees decided to pursue alternatives to BCG's offer and "met or otherwise communicated with seven other bidders for the purpose of soliciting either a tender offer for all or part of the TRT shares or an offer to purchase the assets of TRT. The trustees also attempted, without success, to persuade BCG to amend its offer to provide for purchase of all outstanding TRT shares." Terrydale, 611 F. Supp. at 1013 (footnote omitted).
*919 After a Canadian company, Unicorp Financial Corporation, decided not to enter into the battle for control of TRT, its president, George Mann, notified SFREI (40% of whose stock was owned by Unicorp) of the TRT opportunity. SFREI eventually proposed to purchase approximately 80% in value of TRT's assets (i.e., four office buildings located in Denver, Colorado) after originally expressing interest in acquiring all of the outstanding TRT shares.
Several meetings of the TRT trustees followed. First, they met as a group on February 2, 1981, to consider the SFREI proposal and other alternatives to the BCG tender offer. The "independent trustees," i.e., those who were not members of the Gramlich family, met on February 5 and concluded that the SFREI offer was in the best interests of all the TRT shareholders. All of the TRT trustees unanimously approved the sale of the Denver properties to SFREI on February 6 and, in addition, adopted and disclosed a liquidation plan whereby the proceeds of the SFREI sale would be distributed to TRT shareholders along with the remaining trust assets. A liquidating dividend of $24 per share would also be distributed on February 23 to all the TRT shareholders of record as of February 19.
1. Breach of Fiduciary Duty
In our most recent opinion involving this litigation, we determined that the business judgment rule/duty of loyalty analysis was applicable to the trustees of a REIT. Terrydale, 611 F. Supp. at 1016. We also noted that plaintiff had submitted sufficient evidence to create issues of fact regarding the self-interest of trustees John Gramlich, J. Russell Gramlich, and J. Harlan Stamper; the Gramlichs' domination and control over trustees Murphy, O'Flaherty, and Stamper (to the extent Stamper was not otherwise self-interested); and the fairness and reasonableness of the transactions at issue. Terrydale, 611 F. Supp. at 1019-32. Thus, for plaintiff to prevail in its remaining claim against defendants, it must prove by a preponderance of the evidence, that, under the applicable analysis, the TRT trustees breached their fiduciary duty.
Where business trustees have acted in good faith and have exercised honest judgment in lawful and legitimate furtherance of the trust's purposes, courts will neither inquire into nor interfere with their actions. See Norlin Corp. v. Rooney, Pace Inc., 744 F.2d 255, 264 (2d Cir. 1984) (quoting Auerbach v. Bennett, 47 N.Y.2d 619, 629, 419 N.Y.S.2d 920, 926, 393 N.E.2d 994, 999 (1979)). This posture of respect is affiliated with the "duty of care" prong of the trustee's duty to the shareholdersi.e., "the responsibility of a ... fiduciary to exercise, in the performance of his tasks, the care that a reasonably prudent person in a similar position would use under similar circumstances." Norlin, supra, 744 F.2d at 264; see also Hanson Trust PLC v. ML SCM Acquisition, Inc., 781 F.2d 264, 273 (2d Cir.1986). The duty of loyalty, the second prong of a trustee's obligation to shareholders, "derives from the prohibition against self-dealing that inheres in the fiduciary relationship." Norlin, 744 F.2d at 264. Once plaintiff has made a prima facie showing that the trustees had a self-interest in the subject transaction, "the duty of loyalty supercedes the duty of care, and the burden shifts to the [trustees] to `prove that the transaction was fair and reasonable to the trust.'" Norlin, 744 F.2d at 265 (quoting Treadway Companies, Inc. v. Care Corp., 638 F.2d 357, 382 (2d Cir.1980); see also Hanson, supra, 781 F.2d at 273.
The Second Circuit has recently written that "[i]t is not enough that [trustees] merely be disinterested and thus not disposed to self-dealing or other indicia of a breach of the duty of loyalty." Hanson, supra, 781 F.2d at 274. Rather, they also must meet the standard of due care "with `conscientious fairness'"i.e., they must *920 make informed decisions after "gathering and considering material information" with "reasonable diligence." Id. (citation omitted). If they adhere to "`methodologies and procedures' [that] are `so restricted in scope, so shallow in execution, or otherwise so pro forma or halfhearted as to constitute a pretext or sham,' then inquiry into their acts is not shielded by the business judgment rule." Id. (quoting Auerbach, supra, 419 N.Y.S.2d at 929, 393 N.E.2d at 1002-003); but see id. at 285-91 (Kearse, J., dissenting).
Plaintiff alleges the two Gramlich trustees' self-interest as predicated upon desired continued management of the properties and the receipt of fees and commissions therefrom as well as their personal debt situation. Defendants seem to have conceded that the two Gramlich trustees were "interested" (see Letter of June 30, 1986 from Attorneys for Defendants at 6), but, more importantly, the remaining trustees perceived the Gramlichs to be "interested" and arranged to meet separately to discuss the SFREI transaction. See, e.g., Tr. 484-85.
We note, however, that although plaintiff contends the Gramlichs' dire financial straits prompted their desperation to consummate the deal with the "white knight" which led to the sacrifice of the best interests of the shareholders (see Terrydale, 611 F.Supp. at 1020-21), this does not appear to have been the case. While it is true the Gramlichs had a $890,872 loan obligation falling due on February 10, 1981 (id.), J. Russell Gramlich testified that the payments on the note could have been met by turning the Gramlichs' stock over to BCG at the last moment if "[they] had no better offer for our stockholders." Tr. 1419-20. Michael Gramlich apparently "was in Kansas City with all [of the] stock ready to tender it to the Grace people in case this deal didn't go through with [SFREI]." Tr. 1431. Although this plan poses certain difficulties regarding John Gramlich's and Michael Gramlich's apparent ignorance of it (see Plaintiff's Supplemental Memorandum of Law of July 29, 1986 at 49-52 ("Plaintiff's Supp. Memo.")), the Gramlichs' prior announcement advising shareholders not to tender their stock, and possible short-swing profit problems, 15 U.S.C. § 78p(b), it at least indicates that the Gramlichs were not as "desperate" as plaintiff intimates. Moreover, J. Russell Gramlich also testified that his other investments could have helped cover the loan. Tr. 1419.
We also reject plaintiff's contention that the Gramlichs' self-interest and bad faith likewise were demonstrated by their decision to announce the consummation of the transaction no later than Friday, February 6, 1981. According to plaintiff, the documentation regarding rent adjustments supports its view that the closing did not take place until Monday, February 9, 1981. Pretrial Order at Exh. 3B ("Plaintiff TLT's Factual Contentions") ¶ 182; Tr. 602. Thus, the Gramlich trustees allegedly accelerated the announcement so that the TRT shareholders would know they would receive a liquidating dividend and thereby defeat the BCG tender offer. This acceleration also allegedly prevented BCG from seeking to enjoin further consummation of the closing because of the latter's belief that the entire deal had been finalized on February 6, 1981.
In fact, as Stamper testified, a title company acting as TRT's agent had received the proceeds of the sale on February 6, 1981 "and they had held it over the weekend because they had no means to transmit it until Monday." Tr. 595; 600-01. It was therefore TRT's position that it had the right to declare the dividend on February 6, 1981. Most importantly, however, on the facts of the case and the state of events at that time, it seems highly improbable that any court would have granted BCG injunctive relief.
Assuming the Gramlich's self-interest, though, "the Board as a whole cannot be charged with having acted from self-interest where less than a majority are found to have done so." Buffalo Forge Co. v. Ogden Corp., 555 F. Supp. 892, 904 (W.D. N.Y.) (emphasis added) (citing Treadway, *921 supra, 638 F.2d at 358), aff'd, 717 F.2d 757 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 1018, 104 S. Ct. 550, 78 L. Ed. 2d 724 (1983); but see Dynamics Corp. v. CTS Corp., 794 F.2d 250, 256 (7th Cir.1986) (a conflict of interest is not cured by vesting the power of decision in a board of directors in which insiders are a minority). We are satisfied as a factual matter that of the non-Gramlich trustees, Stamper was not "improperly influenced by personal considerations or benefits not available to other shareholders generally" (see Terrydale, 611 F. Supp. at 1022 (citations omitted)) and Murphy, O'Flaherty, and Stamper were not so dominated and controlled by the Gramlichs that their independence and financial disinterest were overcome. Id. at 1022 (citing Aronson v. Lewis, 473 A.2d 805, 812 (Del.1984)). Although it was bad judgment to allow the personal attorney for the Gramlichs and TMC, James Polsinelli, Esq., to attend the independent trustees' meeting, we find that Polsinelli's presence at that meeting did not undermine the independent trustees' careful and objective consideration of the SFREI offer and their primary concern for the interests of all of the shareholders.See text infra.
Lack of self-interest alone, as we already have noted, is not enough to satisfy a fiduciary's duty of care. In Hanson, supra, the Second Circuit reversed the district court's denial of a motion for a preliminary injunction restraining the exercise of a lock-up option despite the fact that it agreed that the defendants had not acted fraudulently, in bad faith or out of self interest. 781 F.2d at 274. According to the court, what made out a prima facie case of a breach of the duty of care, shifting the burden of justification to the defendants, was the failure of the directors "to take many of the affirmative directorial steps that underlie the finding of due care." Id. at 275. For example, the directors had voted for the lock-up option with a "paucity of information" after a three hour meeting, thereby not availing themselves of the week's time available before the tender offer deadline. 781 F.2d at 271, 275. Moreover, if they had inquired into the value of the two optioned businesses (which generated half of the target's income but represented only one-third of the purchase price for the entire company) rather than "contented themselves with their financial advisor's conclusory opinion that the option prices were `within the range of fair value,'" they would have learned that the range of fairness had not been calculated and Goldman Sachs had not even prepared a written opinion as to the value of the two optioned businesses. Id. at 275. According to the Second Circuit, other things evidencing the improper exercise of due care included the fact that the target's principal financial advisor indicated that an "orderly sale" could achieve higher prices for the optioned businesses, no opinion had been offered as to what kind of company the target would be without these "core" businesses, and the Board had failed to ensure the negotiations of alternative bids and, in essence, rubberstamped *922 a proposal engineered by management directors holding a potential 15% equity interest in the arrangement. Id. at 276-77; see also id. at 269-70.
This Court finds that in the instant case, the trustees properly exercised their duty of care. The Board in Hanson was faced with an unsolicited tender offer for "any and all shares of [the target's] common stock" for a price per share that was conditionally raised twice without the target's request during the course of leveraged buyout negotiations between the target and a third party. 781 F.2d at 270, 272. In contrast, the TRT trustees faced a partial tender offer replete with potential disadvantages. Like the Board in Hanson, the TRT trustees sought out other alternatives under tremendous time pressures; however, the latter also unsuccessfully sought to negotiate with the tender offeror for the purchase of all outstanding TRT shares while the former ignored the tender offeror's "overtures for discussions." See 781 F.2d at 269, 270.
Although discussions with SFREI did not develop into a final proposal until approximately February 5, 1981, the TRT trustees had been discussing the proposed asset sale as well as other alternatives since February 2, 1981. Thus, their unanimous vote for the final proposal on February 6, 1981 followed four days of consideration compared to the three hours in which the independent trustees in Hanson for the first time learned about and approved the new leveraged buyout merger agreement and the proposed lock-up option. 781 F.2d at 271; see also Dynamics Corp., supra, 794 F.2d at 256-257 (target's management announced its opposition same day unsolicited tender offer was announced without studying any business or financial implications of tender offer or consulting with target's outside directors). Moreover, the transaction at issue in Hanson demanded the Board's "heightened duty of care" in order to ensure that one did not cross the critical line between a price low enough to lure a reluctant potential bidder and one lower than "`reasonable permission w[ould] allow.'" 781 F.2d at 276 (emphasis in original) (citations omitted). Since no lock-up option was at issue in the instant matter, a "heightened duty of care" was not demanded.
Plaintiff emphasizes certain factors as evidencing the TRT trustees' breach of their duty of care. These factors relate to the Gramlichs' self-interest in defeating the BCG tender offer and how this self-interest allegedly led to a sacrifice of the property at distressed prices. See Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law Opposing Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, Under the Business Judgment Rule (June 27, 1986) at 7. According to the Second Circuit in Hanson, to the extent that self-interest impacts upon the duty of care even after a court has determined that there was no fraud, bad faith or self-dealing, it calls upon independent trustees to take "at least some of the prophylactic steps that were identified as constituting due care in Treadway [, supra ]" when a self-interested management has made the proposal at issue. Hanson, 781 F.2d at 277. In Hanson, however, on top of its 15% equity interest, management was discussing a leveraged buyout with the investment banking concern ultimately hired as the Board's advisors before the Board first met to discuss the unsolicited tender offer, and it was management and these advisors who generated a response to the tender offeror's raised bid. 781 F.2d at 277. Confusion over whether the law firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen and Katz represented management or the Board, moreover, continued "[e]ven after [the firm] was formally retained by the Board." Id. Not only were none of these factors present in the TRT transaction, but the Gramlichs certainly *923 did not present the independent trustees with the SFREI proposal "more or less as faits accompli, which [the independent trustees] then quite hastily approved." Id. The Gramlichs also did not do something that was appropriately criticized in Dynamics Corp., supra, 794 F.2d at 256-257 hire an investment advisor to prepare a "fairness opinion" who was to receive a bonus if the tender offeror lost a proxy fight.
Even if the Gramlichs' alleged interests amounted to the same sort present in Hanson, a finding of a breach of the duty of care would not be warranted. In Treadway, supra, the directors, among other things, hired an investment banking firm to negotiate for them and to assist in evaluating the various proposals, asked numerous questions and requested pro forma balance sheets for the combined company, and conditioned their approval of the transaction on obtaining an opinion regarding its fairness. 638 F.2d at 384. Nowhere, however, have these actions been prescribed as the sole means by which this duty can be fulfilled. See Dynamics Corp., supra, 794 F.2d at 258 (particular methodology used by target to analyze tender offer would have been of "little moment" if the defensive tactic adopted had been acceptable because the court had "no desire to force boards of directors into a judicialized mode of proceeding and ... recognize[d] the time pressure under which the board was operating").
Here, the independent trustees called a separate meeting pursuant to their own initiative. See text supra. They also knew that the cash each shareholder would receive was approximately the same under either proposal, but that only a deal struck with SFREI would benefit all the shareholders; that no other "white knight" was willing to offer anything above this value; and that the BCG tender offer might not only wreak havoc with TRT's tax status but also could leave minority shareholders in a very disfavorable position. The independent trustees even considered revaluing the Denver properties and concluded that other problems would obviate the predictability and worth of new appraisals, Plaintiff's Exh. 14A (e.g., the instability of the Denver market; the various encumbrances on the properties; etc.); moreover, the time exigencies created by the BCG tender offer mooted this possibility. Finally, by pledging their approval of the SFREI proposal, they did not foreclose further bidding for TRT. See Hanson, 781 F.2d at 264; see also Dynamics Corp., supra, 794 F.2d at 258. In fact, the BCG tender offer was instead extended and adjusted to reflect the liquidating dividend, by January, 1982, BCG had acquired just under 50% of the outstanding TRT stock, and a slate of BCG nominees was elected to serve as trustees of TLT when it was created on January 28, 1982. Terrydale, 611 F. Supp. at 1014.
Even if we found that the TRT trustees had breached their duty of care, we would need to determine whether the shifted burden of proving the fairness and reasonableness of the transaction has been *924 met. See Hanson, 781 F.2d at 277. We find that such is the case.
It should be noted at the outset that the idea of liquidating TRT was not first promulgated as a response to the BCG tender offer. John Gramlich had been suggesting liquidation "for a couple of years" (Tr. 205; see also Tr. 1264) in order to deal with a problem REITs collectively had been facing the undervaluation of their stock. See Tr. 841; 1237-38; 1843. As Stamper testified at trial,
[W]e had discussed whether there would come a time where we had a duty to the shareholders because of the underlying value to liquidate and give them their money back. The reason we had considered it more than a year before was because the value of our shares had gotten down to somewhere around 12 or 14 dollars, as I recall it, and we wondered whether it was fair to the shareholders to just continue giving them dividends at the level we were able to or whether we ought to actively consider selling the properties and giving them their money back and letting them reinvest in something else.
Tr. 564. Courts generally have treated challenged transactions that facilitate plans which were under consideration before anyone moved to acquire stock more favorably than those "cooked up" solely in response to contests for control. See Norlin, supra, 744 F.2d at 265 n. 7; see also Treadway, supra, 638 F.2d at 383; Crouse-Hinds Co. v. Internorth, 634 F.2d 690, 703-04 (2d Cir.1980). Thus, it does not "strain credulity" to discern merit in the SFREI transaction and subsequent TRT liquidation. Norlin, 744 F.2d at 265.
That such merit conceivably is present is buttressed by a comparison to Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Abrams, 510 F. Supp. 860 (S.D.N.Y.1981). There, a tender offer prompted the board, once legal proceedings collapsed, to announce "a proposed buy-out of a small segment only of stockholders, using the corporate till to accomplish this at a price [$15 per share above the tender offer price] and with a preferred stock issue in the background...." 510 F. Supp. at 861. A "frenzied search for a competitive third party offer" had not as yet panned out and "a proposed selling off of the assets was in contemplation by a plan to seek the sale of [the target's] attractive properties, ... one of ... which yield[ed] 10% of the corporate earnings, and to raise more cash to buy in more stock in that way with the company's treasury." Id. at 861-62. In issuing a temporary restraining order sought by the tender offeror, Judge Pollack opined that "[i]t [wa]s inconceivable that an alleged flourishing enterprise ha[d] authorized its board to subject ... the company to a scorched earth policy ... merely to thwart a change in existing stock ownership which may end the tenure of the present directors and key officers of the company." Id. at 861.
Plaintiff has attempted to show that the sale of the Denver properties was not fair to TRT and its public shareholders because the buildings were grossly undervalued. Specifically, plaintiff has alleged that the June 1980 appraisal of the Lincoln Tower Building prepared by Blain Chase understated its true value as $18,000,000. Plaintiff claims that this undervaluation was evidenced by the November 1982 sale closing of the same building by Lincoln Tower Building Company (when values in the Denver office building market were lower) to Subdale Corporation for $26 million. Plaintiff also points to Chase's "Preliminary Revaluation" of the fee in the amount of $24 million on February 2, 1981. Plaintiff further claims that Chase, inter alia, utilized in his June 1980 report a capitalization rate that was too high and an economic rental rate that was too low.
With respect to the Petroleum Building, sold to SFREI for $6,713,000, plaintiff claims that the revised appraisal of Van Court & Company (October 1980) overlooked both a significant change in rental rates and the sale of the Lincoln Center Building, the same sale that had prompted Chase's "Preliminary Revaluation" of the Lincoln Tower Building. Plaintiff also *925 claims that the market in February 1981, when TRT sold the Petroleum Building, was no different than that in December, 1981, when SFREI did a property analysis and evaluation of its leasehold interest in the building and valued it at $12,400,000 ("almost double what it paid TRT"); Joseph J. Blake & Associates received and concurred with SFREI's estimate of current fair market value. Plaintiff's Exh. 62.
As to the Travelers Building (also known as the "101 University Building"), sold to SFREI for $2,485,000, plaintiff first claims that TRT itself admitted in January, 1981 that it appraised the building to Mid American Bank at $4 million. Plaintiff also claims that the May 1980 Van Court & Company appraisal was obsolete as of February, 1981 due to the fact that the entire building became vacant on July 31, 1980, allowing SFREI to lease the entire building at the then higher current market rates. Finally, plaintiff once again compares the appraisal to SFREI's own December, 1981 property analysis and evaluation, with which J. Blake and Associates concurred, valuing the leasehold interest at $4,950,000. Plaintiff's Exh. 48. With respect to the Century Bank Building, plaintiff also claims that TRT sold its fee interest at a price substantially below the building's fair market value.
Plaintiff's expert witness, Joseph Farber, MAI, CRE, also estimated the value of the leasehold estate interests in three of the subject properties as of February 6, 1981. Mr. Farber concluded in his report that the values were as follows: (a) Lincoln Tower Building$17,150,000; (b) Petroleum Building$11,750,000; (c) Travelers Building $3,875,000. Plaintiff's Exh. 662 at 3. He also concluded that the value of the third mortgage owned by TRT against the Lincoln Tower Building was $6,930,000 and that the value of the leasehold estate interest in this same building may have increased somewhat by the later April 22, 1981 date. Id.
We find that the burden of justification for the transaction has been met primarily by the introduction of "evidence to rebut [plaintiff's] extensive evidence that the [building] prices were undervalued." Hanson, 781 F.2d at 277. The Court's role, of course, is not to ascertain "the `precise value'" of the buildings. Id. at 278; cf. Alpert v. 28 William St. Corp., 63 N.Y.2d 557, 483 N.Y.S.2d 667, 675, 473 N.E.2d 19, 26 (1984). Rather, it is to determine whether the burden of proving that the SFREI transaction was fair and reasonable has been met. For example, in Lewis v. S.L. & E., Inc., 629 F.2d 764 (2d Cir.1980), a shareholder's derivative suit where it was alleged that the corporation's assets were wasted, the Second Circuit held that defendants had failed to prove that the rental paid for the years 1966-72 was fair and reasonable. However, although it noted that defendants' own evidence supported plaintiff's suggested fair rental value, the Court never determined for its own purposes the precise rental rate. Id. at 772.
With respect to the valuation of the four Denver properties sold to SFREI, this Court is convinced that the marketplace at that time was its most faithful indicator. First, the trustees never quarreled with the fairness of the BCG price of $33.50 per share and would have approved the tender *926 offer if they had been successful at convincing BCG to make it available to all TRT stockholders. See, e.g., Tr. 144-45; 147; 195-96; 500; 698; 702; 1249-50. Second, in Murphy's words, "at least seven sophisticated investors [refused] to pay more than, at least offer [sic] $33 and a half a share." Tr. 148; see also Tr. 707-08, 752, 1246-48. As one of the defendants' expert witnesses testified, a "spotlight" was on TRT as early as December, 1981 when the Grace people filed a 13D form, soon followed by a proxy fight and tender offer. Tr. 1813 (testimony of Jeffrey Bloomberg, Managing Director of Bear Stearns & Co.). These events indicated to the world at large that a public company was "in play and anyone interested in acquiring assets for [sic] the company is alerted that the assets or the company will be available and starts to make inquiry." Tr. 1814. Thus, under such circumstances, interested parties tend to surface and the offers tend to approximate the current fair market value. Tr. 1850.
We also do not find any merit in plaintiff's contention that John Gramlich's search for a deal at $35 per share (knowing he would have "to settle somewhere in between 35 and 33.50," Tr. 811) effectively proscribed higher offers. Tr. 1484. Not only were four of the trustees themselves in the real estate business (i.e., the Gramlichs, O'Flaherty, and Murphy), making it extremely doubtful that they would be unaware of the trust's "unburied treasure" (see text infra), but if the value of the stock was as high as plaintiff projects, SFREI would not have been the only bidder.
In Hanson, supra, where one of the businesses was optioned at $350 million, "one of the first potential `white knight' leveraged buyout firms ... contacted ... valued [that particular business] at about $550 million as part of its consideration as to whether it would make a tender offer...." 781 F.2d at 279. No such evidence from other prospective bidders was adduced here. In fact, the principals of BCG themselves declined to bid for the very building (Lincoln Tower) plaintiff now claims was worth at least $24 million when the Lincoln Tower Building Company offered it to them for approximately $19 million on or about February 17, 1981 (the latter was prepared to first exercise its option to acquire the building from SFREI). Pretrial Order at Exh. 10B(i) ("SFREI's Proposed Findings of Fact Relating to Plaintiff's Claims Against SFREI") ¶¶ 148-49; Tr. 1032-35; see also Letter from Defendants' counsel of July 24, 1986 at 8-9.
Defendants' own expert witness, E. Nelson Bowes, MAI, CRE, reviewed the appraisals for the four Denver properties on which the sale price was based and concluded that they were reasonable both at the time they were rendered and on February 6, 1981. We agree with Bowes' conclusion. With respect to the Lincoln Tower Building and Blain Chase's February, 1981 "Preliminary Revaluation," we agree that even if one were to characterize it as a new appraisal, others knowledgeable in real estate may have found it inappropriate to apply the capitalization rate that had been utilized to appraise the Lincoln Center Building, a newer, different class building (i.e., class A, while Lincoln Tower was class B) situated in a better location. Thus, whatever *927 plaintiff's explanation is for Chase's subsequent retraction from his February, 1981 "Preliminary Revaluation," (Pretrial Order at Exh. 3B ("Plaintiff TLT's Factual Contentions") ¶ 102; see also Chase Dep. of May 16, 1984), the bottom line is that it was reasonable for the TRT trustees that knew about it (see, e.g., Tr. 82, 88-89, 556, 816, 829, 832, 835-37; contra Plaintiff's Supp. Memo. at 1-12) not to have relied upon it. In fact, Stamper, John J. Gramlich and J. Russell Gramlich all testified that even if the Lincoln Tower Building had been worth $24 million in February, 1981, they would have voted for the SFREI sale (primarily because it took all of the shareholders out for the most money then offered). See Tr. 556-57, 837-39, 1447; see also text infra.
Plaintiff's criticisms of the methodology and numerical data (e.g., for rental and capitalization rates, Plaintiff's Exh. 662) used in the original appraisals of all of the buildings also have been adequately addressed by the defendants (see generally Defendants' Exh. U (Bowes' Appraisal Review Four Buildings); Tr. 1872-1986) and changes in the Denver rental market from the appraisal dates up until February 6, 1981 seem to have only either compensated for earlier overvaluations or made minor differences in the ultimate price. Moreover, what impresses this Court most with respect to the validity of these original appraisals is that neither the appraisers nor the owners themselves, who were valuing their own property, had any motivation to misstate the value. See Tr. 1882 (Farber himself "did not think that there was any intention of any of these appraisers to in any manner, shape or form come to a conclusion that was made as instructed by a client").
Compared to what the Hanson court found raised a serious question that the assets had been significantly undervalued, the criticisms voiced here, even if justified, seem minor. See Buffalo Forge, supra, 555 F. Supp. at 905 (noting that valuations are not an exact science); see also Tr. 1883 (testimony of Joseph Farber) (stating that real estate appraisal is an art rather than a mathematical science). In addition to what already has been mentioned, the target's principal advisor in Hanson (its investment banker at Goldman Sachs) himself testified that he had utilized tonnage, "`a lousy way to value'" one of the optioned businesses and had employed a very significant measure of valuation, expected earnings, with "the two lowest actual and projected earnings years in a ten-year sequence." 781 F.2d at 278. Moreover, using his own firm's valuation charts and applying what he considered appropriate price-earnings ratios at the evidentiary hearing, he valued one of the target's divisions at a minimum of $70 million above the price it had been optioned for. Id. at 279; see also id. at 280 n. 10. With regard to the other division optioned in the Hanson transaction, "`no document was produced in discovery which reflect[ed] a valuation or divestiture of [it] at less than $100 million prior to the grant of the Lock-Up Option;'" nonetheless, it was optioned for $80 million. Id. at 270, 280; see also Dynamics Corp., supra, 794 F.2d at 258-259 (criticizing poison pill that, among other things, burdened the target with a new, long-term fixed debt and precluded a hostile tender offer).
Probably what is most indicative of the fairness of the SFREI transaction relates to the Gramlich trustees' 30% equity interest in TRT. As Bloomberg testified, the situation at hand did not involve "professional management [which generally] has a different axe to grind; [rather, what was involved was] a trustee group that ha[d] a great economic interest in maximizing the value for all shareholders." Tr. 1822; see also Tr. 1810. If the assets were truly undervalued, the Gramlichs would have been forfeiting a tremendous sum of money for nothing in returni.e., "the sale to San Francisco didn't carry a golden parachute or long-term employment contract so that [the Gramlichs] would get money as opposed to other shareholders." Tr. 1810, *928 1822. There is thus lacking a motivation for allegedly underselling the shareholders. In essence, the interests of the rest of the shareholders were on a par with those of the Gramlichs and everyone concerned received the same benefits from the liquidation.
BCG's own refusal to extend its offer to 100% of the available shares or effectuate any "second step" or "back end" transaction to acquire the shares not purchased pursuant to the tender offer adds support to this conclusion. See Tr. 1803-04. So does the uncertainty of the remaining alternatives. For instance, plaintiff contends that an orderly liquidation in the year following the tender offer would have maximized the return to TRT shareholders. However, there was no guarantee that BCG would choose to liquidate following a successful tender offer; it had previously refrained from committing itself to such a course of action and even a decision to subsequently liquidate may not have been to the remaining shareholders advantage. Tr. 1805; Defendants' Exh. W (Jeffrey Bloomberg's Opinion Letter) at 8. If the TRT trustees had made their own announcement urging shareholders to reject the BCG offer in lieu of a planned liquidation one year down the line, moreover, defeat of the partial tender offer was equally unlikely. Tr. 1801-02, 1849; see also Defendants' Exh. W at 7; Dynamics Corp., supra, 794 F.2d at 254; Lowenstein, Pruning Deadwood in Hostile Takeovers: A Proposal for Legislation, 83 Colum.L. Rev. 249, 254, 307-09 (1983). Its success would have resulted in a loss of REIT status and the resulting diminished value of the company as well as a fall in the stock's market price. See Defendants' Exh. W at 5-6.
This is not an instance where the trustees "`end[ed] the auction with ... little objective improvement'" or wanted SFREI "in the picture at all costs." Hanson, supra, 781 F.2d at 283 (quoting MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc. v. Revlon, 501 A.2d 1239, 1249 (Del.Ch.), aff'd, 505 A.2d 454 (1985)). Rather, the trustees selected the best offer available at a time when some immediate action was mandated. See Buffalo Forge, supra, 555 F. Supp. at 904.
We have scrutinized the transaction with great care because we recognized that certain of its attributes rendered it superficially suspecte.g., the willingness of defendants to purchase the Lincoln Tower Building subject to a right of first refusal; the seller's request that the buyer render an opinion as to the TRT trustees' ability to conduct the transaction. See, e.g., Tr. 1300-01; 1320-23; 1391. Nevertheless, in our view, the transaction has been justified by the fact that the values at which the properties were sold to SFREI were fair and reasonable and the way it served other important trust and shareholder interests. See Norlin, 744 F.2d at 267; see also Defendants' Exh. W at 6 and text supra; Terrydale, 611 F. Supp. at 1025; Alpert, supra, 483 N.Y.S.2d at 676, 473 N.E.2d at 27 (transaction must have involved not only fair dealing and fair price, but must have treated all shareholders equally). Unlike the action taken by the directors in Hanson, this action, viewed in its entirety, "redound[ed] to the benefit of [TLT] and its shareholders." Hanson, 781 F.2d at 281.
2. Knowledge of Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Even if the TRT trustees had breached their fiduciary duty, a duty of restitution could be imposed on SFREI only if the latter knew or should have known that a breach had been committed. Terrydale, 611 F. Supp. at 1031. In other words, the defendants can only be held liable as constructive trustees of the transferred properties if they knew or should have *929 known that a breach of fiduciary duty had occurred. Id. at 1032.
At trial, we noted the burden that would be imposed by holding a purchaser "chargeable with all that goes on in the inner councils of the seller" simply by virtue of the fact that the former either has made a bargain purchase or is aware of the seller's distress. Tr. 765; see also Terrydale, 611 F. Supp. at 1030-31. However, this is a bridge we need not cross as we are convinced that if the values of the TRT properties were such common knowledge that anyone operating in the market would or should have known of them, TRT would have been able to obtain an offer at a higher price than that proposed by SFREI. As we have already rejected other explanations offered for the market's silence, we conclude that SFREI cannot be presumed to have known that the TRT trustees had breached their fiduciary duty.
Other factors also lead to this conclusion. As we noted earlier, defendants made certain "uncontradicted assertions establish[ing] the basis for their belief in the reasonableness of the transaction from TRT's point of view" (Terrydale, 611 F.Supp. at 1029)e.g., legitimate reasons for opposing the BCG tender offer; its offer to purchase TRT's assets was higher than any other offer on a per share basis; instability of the Denver market and risks associated with acquiring the TRT properties derived from "`due on sale provisions,' necessary renovations, [and] long-term leases at unfavorable rents." Id. Thus, to the extent, if any, that defendants were required to make an inquiry, they fulfilled their duty and came up with sufficient facts to reasonably conclude that the trustees had not breached any duty and that SFREI's purchase of the assets would be legitimate. See Pretrial Order at Exh. 10B(ii) ("SFREI's Proposed Conclusions of Law Relating to Plaintiff's Claims Against SFREI") ¶¶ 112-24 and cases cited therein.
Finally, we have previously noted that the Restatement (Second) of Trusts "provides appropriate and helpful guidance in resolving the issue of notice." Terrydale, 611 F. Supp. at 1031 n. 44:
Among the circumstances which are or may be of importance are the following: (1) whether he knows that the person with whom he is dealing is in fact a trustee; (2) the extent to which he has reason to believe that the person with *930 whom he is dealing is or may be a trustee ...; (3) the character of the property dealt with, whether it is land or a chattel or a chose in action, negotiable or non-negotiable; (4) whether the transaction is one in the ordinary course of the business of the trustee; (5) whether the trustee is disposing of the property for much less than its real value; (6) whether the third person knows or has reason to believe that the trustee is dealing with the property for his own benefit; (7) whether the third person is purchasing the property or engaging in some other transaction with the trustee, as for example where he is making a payment or conveyance to the trustee ... or is acting as depository of trust funds ... or is a corporation registering a transfer of securities ... or is engaged in some other dealings with the trustee....
Id. (quoting Restatement (Second) of Trusts § 297, Comment a (1959)).
As defendants point out, factor 5 is absent as "this is not a case in which the disparity in price is so overwhelming and absence of legitimate business purpose so evident that knowledge of irregularity can reasonably be presumed." Terrydale, 611 F. Supp. at 1030-31 (citation omitted); see also Pretrial Order at Exh. 10B(ii) ("SFREI's Proposed Conclusions of Law Relating to Plaintiff's Claims Against SFREI") ¶ 121. In fact, Joseph Farber's testimony confirmed that even if the valuations were understated, they were not so understated as to inadvertently put any purchaser on notice. Rental, vacancy and operating expense rates within ten percent of those utilized by Farber, a margin of error he himself found acceptable, could lead to appraisal values closely approximating those obtained by TRT's original appraisers. See Tr. 1957; 1974. Farber also articulated that "there is room for question in every appraiser's interpretation of the marketplace" (Tr. 1882) and that it was judgment, neither competence nor methodology, which separated his own figures from those derived by Blain Chase and Van Court & Company. Tr. 1877, 1881; 1883-84. Finally, we already have determined that the market place was the best indicator of valuation and that it reflected the fairness of the price paid by SFREI. Compare instant case with Rippey v. Denver United States National Bank, 273 F. Supp. 718 (D.Colo.1967); Estate of Rothko, 84 Misc.2d 830, 379 N.Y.S.2d 923 (1975), decree modified and otherwise aff'd, 56 A.D.2d 499, 392 N.Y.S.2d 870, aff'd, 43 N.Y.2d 305, 401 N.Y.S.2d 449, 372 N.E.2d 291 (1977).
Defendants also note that "the TRT trustees were not dealing with the Denver principals for their own account (factor 6) ... and ... SFREI was negotiating `an arm's length commercial transaction' in which [it] had `an independent duty to obtain the most favorable terms' (Factor 7)." Pretrial Order at Exh. 10B(ii) ("SFREI's Proposed Conclusions of Law Relating to Plaintiff's Claims Against SFREI") ¶ 121; see Terrydale, 611 F. Supp. at 1030; 1032-33. Thus, the inquiry outlined by the Restatement (Second) of Trusts provides additional support for our conclusion that defendants should not be held to have known that the TRT trustees breached their fiduciary duty (if one assumes that said breach has been established).
For the foregoing reasons, this Court finds that by voting for the transaction with SFREI and the liquidation plan, the TRT trustees breached neither TRT's Declaration of Trust nor the fiduciary duty they owed to the REIT's shareholders. Even if they had breached this duty, there would have been no basis upon which to conclude that the defendants should have known that such a breach had occurred and thus held to be constructive trustees of the subject properties. In short, we conclude *931 that, lacking actual knowledge of any breach (see note 10 supra), no circumstances existed here (e.g., extreme undervaluation of assets) which would warrant imposition of liability as a constructive trustee. Complaint dismissed.
 See also Wolgin v. Simon, 722 F.2d 389, 393 (8th Cir.1983). As we already have concluded, Missouri law is applicable in the instant case. Terrydale, 611 F. Supp. at 1015. However, "[t]o the extent that no directly applicable Missouri precedents exist," we utilize the law from other jurisdictions for guidance. Id.; see also id. at 1018.
 We also find credible the independent trustees' testimony on this matter. Murphy, for instance, testified that he did not recall Polsinelli having made any comments and that his presence had not at all affected Murphy's thinking. Tr. 160, 191. O'Flaherty, who himself called for the meeting, testified that Polsinelli had asked Stamper whether or not he could attend the meeting and that Stamper told Posinelli it would probably be all right. Tr. 510. O'Flaherty, in line with his duty as chairman of the meeting, questioned Polsinelli's presence, but "had great trust in Mr. Stamper's judgment." Id. O'Flaherty also did not recall Polsinelli's making any particular statements at the meeting. Id.; see also Tr. 512. Although Stamper "signed the minutes for the meeting which said, `As the attorney for the Gramlich family, Mr. Polsinelli believed that the Gramlichs would have preferred that the trust purchase Stern warrants'" (Tr. 750), he, too, considered Polsinelli's presence "immaterial." Tr. 678, 682.
Moreover, we note that even if the comments made by Polsinelli at this meeting accurately portray his role as one of urging adoption of the SFREI plan, our conclusion remains unaltered. See Plaintiff's Exh. 14A (in addition to what is stated above regarding the Stern warrants, Polsinelli commented twice during the meeting that other potential buyers would not pay what SFREI was offering and stated once that they had to "take a hard look at whether or not we should liquidate").
 In fact, in Hanson, the Board seems never to have made any determination regarding the advantages or disadvantages of the unsolicited tender offer. See 781 F.2d at 268. In the month before the tender offer was first announced at a price of $60 per share, moreover, the target's stock was trading at below $50 per share. Id.
 The Court reserved decision on defendants' motion on June 30, 1986. Tr. 1489.
 Plaintiff alleges that in Dynamics Corp., supra, the Seventh Circuit rejected a similar justification proffered by management. There, CTS's contention that the tender offer could not be considered fair when Dynamics was seeking only 17.9 percent of the shares was rejected because (a) since Dynamics already owned 9.6 percent of the shares, every fifth shareholder would get the price it now offered, and (b) all the shareholders benefited ex ante due to the fact that the announcement of the tender offer caused the stock's price to rise. Dynamics Corp., supra, 794 F.2d at 257. The Seventh Circuit did admit, however, that "some stockholders would not have known about the movement in the price and some who did know would adhere to a buy-and-hold strategy, and so not sell." Id. Finally, as we already have noted, all of this would have been of "little moment" to the Seventh Circuit if the adopted defensive tactic had been "a plausible measure for maximizing shareholder wealth." Id.
 Since we have held that the independent trustees were not so dominated and controlled by the Gramlichs that their affirmative votes for the SFREI transaction and the liquidation plan were rendered invalid, we conclude that the sale to SFREI was not in violation of TRT's Declaration of Trust, Article III, § 14. Terrydale, 611 F. Supp. at 1012, 1032-33; see note 10 infra.
 See also Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law Covering SFREI Liability and Duty of Restitution of July 17, 1986 at note 7.
Plaintiff also alleged at trial that the availability of below-market financing on the properties added value to the transaction and should have been recognized in the cash component of sales proceeds received by the seller. Plaintiff's Exh. 663 (Report prepared by David Kaplan, Senior Vice President of The Harlan Company, Inc.); see also Tr. 1540-43. It is unlikely, however, that after negotiating with a lender over potential assumption of a mortgage with a due on sale clause (negotiations involving payment to the lender, thereby raising the interest rate) that the buyer would reward the seller with a higher purchase price. Tr. 1543-46. More importantly, however, buyers could choose to take what they would have to pay up front to assume the mortgage to open a CD and utilize the considerable interest so generated. See Tr. 1560-65. Down the road, those buyers could refinance at a more favorable rate, id.; thus, they would still have the lump sum available to them that others who had purchased the below-market financing could never recoup. Tr. 1568.
 According to Mr. Farber, there is no definitive description of class A and class B buildings and what is usually meant when these terms are utilized is how a given building competes with others "of the same genre on the same floor plate and the same elevating [sic] system." Tr. 1997-98 ("the basic definition of a class A building is how does his rent compare with his competition"). He also stated that the age of the building would not preclude it from falling into the class A category and that the Lincoln Tower Building, although constructed in 1965, was a class A building. Tr. 1998-99.
Although we accept that this may be the viewpoint of some appraisers, we cannot find any reason to criticize the viewpoint of others in the real estate business who do see age as one of the decisive factors in valuation. Moreover, it appears that it was not only the class differential which led defendants' expert, E. Nelson Bowes, to conclude that the Lincoln Center Building was not a good comparable for the Lincoln Tower Building. See Defendants' Exh. U at 16-17; Tr. 1645-47; 1653.
 Plaintiff intimates that the management fees and commissions received by TMC after the asset sale and liquidation (Terrydale, 611 F.Supp. at 1019) were a "material benefit" not available to other shareholders. See Pretrial Order at Exh. 3B ("Plaintiff TLT's Factual Contentions") ¶ 19; see also Tr. 1822. However, if the properties were truly valued as plaintiff alleges, the Gramlichs would have suffered a tremendous loss by opting instead for these fees and commissions. Moreover, one of defendants' experts testified at trial that he had "looked at the fees involved [and] these people were not overpaying themselves when they adopted the plan of liquidation." Tr. 1822 (testimony of Jeffrey Bloomberg).
 In our most recent prior opinion, we noted that SFREI's actual knowledge of a breach of duty must be proven in order to sustain plaintiff's claim of aiding and abetting. Terrydale, 611 F. Supp. at 1027. We dismissed the claim because no genuine issue had been created "regarding SFREI's alleged knowledge of the unfairness and lack of business purpose surrounding the sale and liquidation transaction." Id. at 1028. Furthermore, since we have concluded that there was no violation of TRT's Declaration of Trust (see note 6 supra), defendants cannot be held as "constructive trustees" under the theory that they "should have known" that the independent trustees were dominated and controlled by the Gramlichs, rendering their votes for the transaction invalid. Terrydale, 611 F. Supp. at 1033. Thus, in order to impose a duty of restitution on SFREI, plaintiff really must prove that SFREI should be presumed to have known that a breach of fiduciary duty had been committed. See Pretrial Order at Exh. 10B(ii) ("SFREI's Proposed Conclusions of Law Relating to Plaintiff's Claims Against SFREI") ¶ 109.
 Our conclusion would be the same whether or not we accepted plaintiff's contention that under Missouri law, "defendants have the burden of proving that they took the properties with no notice of the breaches of trust." See Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law Covering SFREI Liability and Duty of Restitution of July 17, 1986 at 22 and cases cited therein; but see Pretrial Order at Exh. C ("SFREI's Contentions with Respect to Disputed Factual Matters") ¶ 5 (alleging that plaintiff bears burden of proof on issue of defendant's constructive notice).
 See Restatement (Second) of Trusts, § 297, Comment a
"A third person has notice of a breach of trust not only when he knows of the breach, but also when he should know of it; that is when he knows facts which under the circumstances would lead a reasonably intelligent and diligent person to inquire whether the trustee is a trustee and whether he is committing a breach of trust, and if such inquiry when pursued with reasonable intelligence and diligence would give him knowledge or reason to know that the trustee is committing a breach of trust."
(Emphasis added). See also text infra.
 Because of this conclusion, we need not determine certain issues raised by the parties at triale.g., whether individual SFREI trustees should be dismissed as defendants; if SFREI still had to pay for the value of the Lincoln Tower Building even though it was transferred pursuant to a 60-day option-to-purchase and SFREI made no profits on the sale.

domain: finance


text:
- Is drinking tea as good as drinking water?
- What is the best drink for kidney disease?
- What dissolves kidney stones fast?
- Is Tea hard on the kidneys?
- Is lemon water good for kidneys?
- Does black tea detox your body?
- Can I drink black tea at night?
- Is black tea better than green tea?
- Can baking soda reverse kidney failure?
- Does black tea have health benefits?
- Does tea count as water?
- How much tea can you drink a day?
- Can a damaged kidney repair itself?
- How much black tea should I drink a day?
- Is black tea OK for kidney disease?
- What foods help repair kidneys?
- How can I repair my kidneys naturally?
- Is black tea good for your liver?
- What fruit is good for kidneys?
- What tea is good for kidney disease?
- What happens if you drink black tea everyday?
Is drinking tea as good as drinking water?


text:
Jefferson City, MO
Chris and Ria Totsikas, founders of Pizzaria Napolitana, immigrated from Greece in 1974. They eventually chose Jefferson City to raise their family in 1976. They were attracted to the strong family values, the strength of the business community, and of the beauty the Capitol grounds. With his prior business experience, Chris and Ria opened their first Pizzaria Napolitana on the old part of Missouri Boulevard next to McDonald’s in 1978.
A lifelong partnership, we like to say that Ria took care of the customer and register, and Chris ran the kitchen and company. Among some of their early successes were the introductions of both the Greek salad and Gyros to our community. They also established one of the first delivery services. Their strong beliefs and core values allowed them to expand at their second location in 1989.
Beautiful atmosphere. Friendly service. Wonderful wait staff, Gage is amazing! Great wifi. Wonderful food! The best we have had in Jefferson City. We always love coming here to date night or just an easy weekend dinner. The buffet is unbelievably good. Highly recommend!
Oh where to begin. The staff there are so kind and funny. The food is just absolutely amazing and overall its possibly my new favorite restaurant. 11/10 would definitely recommend.

domain: history


text:
All you need to take your chicken to the next level is a simple yet full of Mediterranean flavours marinade! And I have just the perfect Greek marinade for chicken […]
Imam Bayildi (stuffed eggplants) is a simple, delicious vegan dish, packed with so much flavor! An amazing combination of fresh aubergines stuffed with a juicy tomato based filling, caramelised onions, […]
If you are looking for a sweet treat, then this Greek Honey Cake (Melopita Sifnos) is a simple and delicious cake to make that will satisfy your craving. The sweetness […]
Greek cuisine is full of recipes that have meaning and this Vasilopita Tsoureki (Greek New Years bread) is a perfect example. Vasilopita bread is a sweet treat that is served […]
Spanakopita (Greek spinach pie) is one of those delicious Greek dishes that you might think is a bit complicated to make. But the good news? It isn’t that hard to […]
Are you a big fan of Baklava but can’t have a dessert without chocolate? Then you’ll love this recipe! This Chocolate Baklava is the perfect combination of the traditional dessert […]
If you are looking for a classic Greek meat pie, then this recipe for Kreatopita will be just what you need! Combining two different types of meat, it is a […]
So you love moussaka but you are fasting for lent or you are a vegan? That doesn’t mean you have to miss out on your favorite dish anymore! This is […]
Who doesn’t love a deliciously soft tsoureki! This is my super easy tsoureki recipe made using a bread machine. It needs less than 10 minutes hands on time to prepare […]
If you are looking for a classic Greek biscuit, then look no further than these Greek olive oil cookies or koulourakia ladiou. Cookies with olive oil are a little different […]
Greek baked bifteki (beef patties) with lemon potatoes! A staple dish in every Greek household! Juicy and well seasoned minced beef, infused with the flavours of parsley, garlic, onions and oregano, […]
A mouthwatering variation of the traditional Greek galaktoboureko made with kataifi dough (shredded phyllo dough)! Golden crispy kataifi dough wrapped around fluffy aromatic semolina custard and bathed in syrup.. Well one […]
Golden and crispy on the outside fluffy in the inside and amazingly fragrant! This super easy 5 minute recipe for Grandma’s tiropitakia with flour and feta cheese will become your […]
Greek baklava rolls (saragli) made to perfection! An amazing combination of crispy golden phyllo wrapped around flavourful nutty filling, bathed in syrup scented with the aromas of lemon cinnamon and […]
Who said homemade sourdough bread needs to be difficult? This is my super easy sourdough bread recipe with starter (psomi me prozimi) for you to make every day with minimal […]
This Easter try out this super easy and aromatic little Lazarakia (Greek Lazarus breads) recipe and combine tradition with family cooking creating wonderful memories for your family! The tradition of […]
Juicy on the inside and perfectly caramelised and smoky on the outside Greek beef souvlaki skewers! All you need to take your Beef kabobs to the next level is a […]
A mouthwatering Greek style chocolate cake recipe (Sokolatopita) with ingredients you already have in your kitchen! Greek style Chocolate cake ingredients One thing all Greek chocolate cake recipes have in […]
This is my go-to Bread machine sourdough bread recipe. Ever since I bought my bread machine, I was thrilled that I could prepare delicious bread with minimal effort every day. But I […]
An amazing super easy traditional Greek recipe for Moustokouloura (Grape must cookies) made in only 35 minutes from scratch! These Moustokouloura cookies are really delicious and fragrant. While baking them […]
An amazing moist aromatic Fanouropita / Phanouropita cake scented with the aromas and blends of cinnamon and ground clove, with sweet raisins and chopped walnuts! This is the traditional recipe for […]
A super easy Greek village bread recipe (Horiatiko Psomi) that will amaze you! This is a Greek rustic bread recipe, that I’m absolutely certain all you bread lovers will enjoy for its simplicity. For […]
A super easy pizza dough recipe that rivals even the best Italian restaurants! Over the years I’ve tried many homemade pizza dough recipes but none of them managed to give […]
An amazing no knead bread recipe for you to make your own homemade bread with literally no effort! This recipe requires no special equipment, mixer or technique. You will only […]
If you haven’t tried Christopsomo (Greek Christmas bread) before, then you are certainly missing out! Soft, fluffy, with a beautiful crust and unique flavour.. This is the most delicious Christopsomo […]
The very best traditional Greek spanakopita recipe! Spanakopita (Greek spinach pie) is one of the most popular Greek dishes, that is known and loved around the world. A very versatile and delicious […]
An absolutely delicious Greek vegetarian moussaka recipe! Layers of sweet aubergine, comforting potatoes and bechamel with a delicious mushroom based sauce that could happily replace my lamb/beef moussaka on my family table. Discover how to make it to perfection with this delicious Greek recipe.
A super versatile, traditional Greek spanakopita triangles recipe (spanakopitakia)! These little treats are perfect for every time of the day as delicious starter, mid-day snack or light dinner! Discover how to make them to perfection with this traditional Greek recipe here…
A unique Greek inspired pita pizza recipe made with pita bread base! Made in only 15 minutes this is the perfect mid week snack or supper! So go ahead, put that delivery menu down and amaze your friends and family with this super easy pita pizza recipe.
These lovely homemade hamburger buns will definitely become the talk of your next barbecue! Fresh, fluffy with a wonderful golden brown semi-soft crust.. This is our very best homemade hamburger buns recipe, which after you try, you will never go for the store version again!
The perfect greek pork chops recipe! Golden and crusty on the outside and perfectly tender and succulent on the inside. This is my favourite Greek brizola recipe (Greek pork chops recipe)! The […]
An amazingly tender Mediterranean flavoured oven baked stuffed sea bass recipe for the lovers of the Greek cuisine! To prepare this delicious baked stuffed sea bass recipe the fish is […]
The very best traditional Greek lamb kleftiko recipe! Juicy and tender, melt-in-the-mouth lamb cooked in parchment paper with fluffy potatoes and a delicious white wine sauce, infused with the aromas of garlic, sweet onions, roast peppers and juicy tomatoes. Simply irresistible! Discover how to make it to perfection here…
A delicious Greek semolina cake recipe (samali) infused with the aromas and blends of mastic and garnished with a lemon and rosewater scented syrup! Samali is a traditional Greek dessert which falls under the category of ‘Siropiasta’, which means syrupy Greek desserts. Discover all the secrets behind this delicious dessert here…
An absolutely delicious Ekmek Kataifi recipe! Discover how to make this traditional Ekmek dish to perfection with my extensive list of hints and tips and detailed preparation photos! Go ahead, indulge yourself!
Who doesn’t love brownies? Soft, moist and extra fudgy with a shiny slightly crackled crust. A homemade goodness for the whole family. And with this recipe you can enjoy them […]
Discover all the secrets behind the very best Greek lamb chops with this traditional Greek recipe! Greek lamb chops (paidakia) are a staple dish at most Greek tavernas, where the chops are slow cooked over an open charcoal pit for that extra smokey flavor.
The fluffiest and crunchiest Greek Easter cookies (koulourakia) you have ever tasted! These sweet little Greek Easter cookies are super quick to bake, so much fun to make and highly […]
Who doesn’t love this ultimate classic dessert? The flaky crust, the scrumptious juicy filling.. A homemade goodness for the whole family! So the idea of a Lenten apple pie, with no […]
The most moist and rich Lenten chocolate cake that despite being an indulgent delight still complies with the dietary instructions of the Lenten season! If you have ever tried making […]
A traditional Greek sesame seed bread rings recipe! If you’ve ever found yourself walking the streets of Athens or Thessalonikis then you can’t have missed on all the street vendors selling these popular sesame koulouria! Discover how to make your own with this original recipe here!
Simplicity is perfection! This amazing traditional briam recipe (Greek roast vegetables) is the brightest example of how Greek cuisine takes the simplest ingredients and with literally no effort transforms them into a finger licking dish! Discover all the secrets behind this traditional delight here…
Our very best Greek zucchini pie recipe (kolokithopita) for the lovers of Greek cuisine! Juicy zucchinis, tangy feta cheese and creamy Greek yogurt combined into a velvety delight wrapped with […]
Let me start by saying that it’s a shame that Lagana is only eaten once a year! Lagana is a delicious Greek flat-bread, which is very similar to focaccia and is […]
Golden, crispy and amazingly moist! Kataifi is a delicious dessert which like baklava is very popular among Greek, Turkish and Middle Eastern nations. An amazing dessert made with roughly chopped walnuts (and […]
A traditional Greek Easter Bread (tsoureki) recipe! Making your own tsoureki can be challenging even for the experienced cooks, but experience has shown me, that it’s all about having the right recipe. Go ahead, find out all the secrets to make it to perfection!
A unique Greek inspired muffin recipe made with aromatic tsoureki dough! Tsoureki is a very popular Greek sweet bread, which texture resembles a brioche, only much better! If you haven’t tried Greek tsoureki before, then you are certainly missing out!
A delicious traditional Greek ‘Tiropitakia’ recipe suitable for every time of the day, as starter or mid-day snack! To prepare this traditional tiropitakia recipe (Greek feta cheese triangles) we crumble the […]
A delicious Greek yogurt cake recipe, infused with the aromas and blends of oranges and lemons and garnished with a cognac scented syrup! Greek yogurt / yoghurt cake (yiaourtopita) is […]
A unique and impressive traditional Greek cheese pie recipe from the region of Kozani! Crispy phyllo wrapped around a melty mix of feta with hard yellow cheese and baked till golden brown… Sounds yummy? Its because it is!

domain: food