text: I was replying to GayFordhamPrepGrad who accused Festing of lying to Boeselager.
  I replied suggesting that it might have been Boeselager who was lying.
  You intervened saying that I "was out on a limb there."
  I asked why, because there is no corroboration of Boeselager's accusation.
  Then you suggested that I ought to substantiate my 'accusation/suggestion'.
  It was neither an accusation nor a suggestion it was just to serve as an illustration that it was as much a possibility that Boeselager was lying as it was that Festing was lying.
  Most posters here consider on the www both Festing and Burke to have lied without any evidence that they have yet you don't take them to task, tell them it is unseemly and unchristian. Why should I be surprised at that?