text: You seize on the minor details of my analogy and twist them into a vicious reply. Perhaps my analogy was somewhat inept. However, my point was simply that just because an organization supports a particular person, doesn't mean that the person supported has any control over the supporting organization or agrees with them.
  I could and do look at "crazy white Republicans" for terrorist tendencies, as you suggest. They concern me as they are not potential immigrants. They're already citizens.
  Including them in my scrutiny doesn't mean that I should stop looking at Muslims for the same thing and for the same reasons I posted earlier.
  Your allegation that I'm likely a racist is unfair and unfounded. I could just as easily and unfairly say that your vicious reply is just an attempt to cover your own racial prejudices. That's most likely ridiculous.
  You obviously have some very strong feelings on this topic. That doesn't excuse the incivility of your response. Can't we just disagree?