text: Actually, I think that he could be breaking some rules with the numbered company that purports to be involved in real estate development and the sale of wood.
  
  If at any time he is  has stayed at the chalet owned by this company, he should be declaring  it as a personal benefit. Has he?
  
  I don't believe that he would own a acreage of land with a house and two lakes and use it only as a rental property .
  
  Or is he claiming an  Arthur Erickson designed house as the sales office for the firewood portion of that company?