text: cont. " In some countries, a victim of hate speech may seek redress under civil law, criminal law, or both. A website which uses hate speech may be called a hate site. Many of these sites contain Internet forums and news briefs that emphasize a particular viewpoint.
  There has been debate over freedom of speech, hate speech and hate speech legislation.[8] Critics have argued that the term "hate speech" is used to silence critics of social policies that have been poorly implemented.[9]"
  
  IMO, and as often is the case, the debate is over "freedom" as defined by our First Amendment and "safety" as represented in possible statutes or, in the case of the University, policies, addressing hate speech.  Mr. Steers clearly favors the "freedom" of open discourse, while Mr. Williams highlights the "dangers" of allowing racists and white supremacists such open forums.  
  
  I would enjoy attending a debate on the UofO between Mr. Steers and Mr. Williams (or other proponents) addressing this topic. GC