text: "It is the dust which becomes heated and inflamed, the entire galaxies burst in all consuming fire resulting in utter destruction..."
  I have no difficulty reading this particular piece of nonsense.  If you meant something different you should have said it differently.  Kaku, in Big Think, confirms what I wrote; not that I needed the confirmation, but you surely did.  I'm not saying you are ignorant of actual science as a "TRAD" (whatever, in your mind, that may be), but as a practicing scientist.  I don't need science-summaries to understand science.  Krauss, Kaku, and Tyson are providing a service to the public in their encapsulations of current theories, but those should all be taken for what they are - making difficult topics accessible to a larger audience - not definitive statements.  Before pointing the "dishonest" finger at anyone, you should probably review how you address replies that point out your manifest errors.  Love to hear back on proof of the aliens at Fatima theory.