text: Yes, absolutely.  In fact, I think he brought much of this ridiculous commentary upon himself.  But my point is that because his comments are personal attacks does not mean that effective arguments against him or his policies should take on the same tone.  I am one who listens keenly to good arguments.  If the premises are factual and can support a conclusion I will accept the conclusion.  Valid arguments whether from President Trump or from those arguing against his policies should attack the argument, never the arguer, otherwise we just wallow in hatred and loathing.  Where does that get us?