text: "The quality of the content just had to improve."
  
  "http://www.libertyheadlines.com/study-fake-news-prone-media-emotional-boozy-others/?AID=7236
  
  This is what I meant when in another article you offered, I related that the consumer would vote w/ their eyes and congregate towards the sources of info that THEY trust.  I found this article on one hand very funny, ironic, and somewhat accurate (the pool of those tested was too small and probably could not be replicated) in their description of journalists, in general.  Having said that, I know that there still are intrepid reporters who still desire to do a good job, report accurately, in a timely manner and in a relevant style.  Then I realized that however unbelievable some of the stories found in today's news sources are, people still are lazily retweeting, passing along, forwarding w/out verifying first.  Maybe w/ all this focus on bad journalism, it might compel the consumer to be more discriminating.