text: 'During the debate, Ms. Khalid said she’s been asked to remove references to Islamophobia in the motion, but refused. “We cannot address a problem if we fail to call it by its true name,” she told the Commons.'
  
  In that case, is it no longer indelicate for a politician to point out that an atrocity, for which a group like ISIS has taken credit, exemplifies "Islamicist extremism"? That sounds like as true a name as you can give it.
  
  Further, if this motion is to be passed, should we also condemn any disagreement with fundamentalist Christian groups (especially criticism that uses inflammatory words such as "fundamentalist Christians"), including those with kooky ideas, as "hatred against Christians"?