text: "“While we are encouraged that a candidate like Mr. Galera, with his wealth of experience, would be interested in applying for the superintendent position, we know that there are many qualified candidates out there, and we hope that they are encouraged to consider applying,” BOE member Patricia Bergin said at Tuesday’s meeting. “Mr. Galera will have to go through the same screening process as all other applicants, and every applicant will be considered on an equal playing field.”
  
  if this is true, then what would the most logical reason be for the foundation to rescind its funding commitment?  by withholding the funds, would the selection "playing field" not be more uneven in favor of a Galera?  decreased financial resources might actually hamper the best and widest search efforts.  there is an enigmatic irony here! ..... unless the Castle Foundation actually prefers Galera?????  hmmm.......!