text: . . . but if not, then DEFINITELY assign additional investigation by Mueller (or another special prosecutor) of Trump's relationship with Weinstein, and the facts Trump observed, heard or PARTICIPATED IN, that gave rise to Trump's being "not surprised" about what is coming out agaisnt Weinstein.
  
  Trump's acknowledgement of a relationship with Weinstein, acknowledgement of knowing things sufficient to form a belief, understanding or opinion about allegations, and his former explicit descriptions (with approval) of conduct that is similar to allegations about Weinstein, HAVE to make everyone at least wonder whether Trump was a witness, participant, or after the fact receiver of descriptions of Weinstein's conduct.
  
  p.s.  Thanks lespark, for opening this important issue up.  Without your comment of questionable relevance, I wouldn't have been able to organize into words the troubling buzz Trump's admissions had caused me since I saw them on VIDEO.