text: "Randal Wilson" Those of us who have been reading your posts on this issue over the last several months have learned a lot about immigration law and practice.  Your posts have been a very valuable addition to the discussions.  From your earlier posts, I know that you do not believe that parliamentarians should use the notwithstanding clause to suspend, at least temporarily, the Supreme Court's 1985 decision in the Singh case, but readers should be aware that that is an option which is spelled out in our Constitution.  And the notwithstanding clause is not simply symbolic. It was put into the Constitution for precisely this type of situation - to allow Parliament to override, at least temporarily, a Court finding on Charter rights.  If Parliament were to invoke the notwithstanding clause in the case of the Singh decision, the Safe Third Country Agreement could be applied to those who enter Canada at locations which are not Ports of Entry.