text: How does this ad hominem comment respond to the article's content/opinion/argument?  What about it do you take issue with?  Is it the concept of equal opportunity, which is a fundamental principle of democracies and our constitution.  You don't believe in it or you don't believe it exists?  Well, it's true the rich, powerful and famous are more equal than others - take Grace Mugabe and the manner the ANC government speedily granted her immunity to shield her from an assault charge, and Oscar Pistorius' lenient sentence - but that's abuse or undermining of constitutional principles - mostly just politics - and is never right.  I may not necessarily agree with Bernstein's opinions, which I only know from these articles - this one I can't fault.  But generally if I disagree I try and say why, otherwise I'm merely venting pointlessly, which no-one wants to hear.