text: Anyone who isn't on Southey's faves list is alt-right?
  
  Is the right to express an opinion limited only to those with whom Tabby agrees?  I thought we had constitutional rights in Canada that are so iron-clad and inalienable we have to pay $10,500,000 to a terrorist who claims his rights were violated.  Surely those constitutional protections extend to those who have a position that Tabby doesn't agree with, don't they?
  
  The G-20 is having a meeting in Hamburg that's being disrupted by thousands of organised hoodlums and malcontents.  Why doesn't Southey decry their actions?  Counter-demonstrations are only offensive when they are by people with whom Southey disagrees politically?