text: The logic shown in this article is so like Donald Trump's it's uncanny. Trump wants to ban and restrict Muslims in the US because a tiny minority of them are committing acts of terrorism against US citizens. This article is arguing that men should be banned and restricted from certain venues because of a small minority of them who are committing violent crimes against women.
  
  The only difference between these two positions is of scale and severity but the logic is irrefutably the same. So if you think Trump's stance against Muslims is deplorable how can you possibly support the identical argument when it is used, albeit at a far smaller scale, against men? You'll note that the reaction in the UK to the Manchester bombing of a rock concert was not to ban Muslims from future concerts so perhaps we can all agree that tarring a group with the same brush because of the actions of a minority is deplorable and we should all stop doing it?