text: part 3 
    Court decisions are unpredictable but it is unlikely on the basis of these decisions that Khadr's lawsuit requesting compensation would  have been successful (and if it were the compensation would have been for breaches under Liberal regimes not Harper's since the Court explicitly stated requesting repatriation was a matter for the Executive to decide. Moreover the Court acknowledged Khadr's detention was under US control. 	Legal doctrine states that a plaintiff will be unable to pursue remedy if it arises in connection with his own illegal act. It's not unreasonable to contend that while Khadr's interrogations by CSIS may have violated the Charter these interrogations weren't unreasonable in the context in which they occured. It's a strong case  that it would have been outrageous dereliction of duty if Canadian intelligence services  had not questioned Mr Khadr following Al Quada's 9/11 attacks  the  biggest terrorist Act in history