text: The Court's answer is ludicrous.  It does not go through standard equal protection, due process, or fundamental rights analysis.  It simply declares, without a shred of grounding in the Constitution, that a man has a right to marry a man.  You have yet to answer the objection that the Framers of the 14th A. never dreamed that their amendment would REQUIRE the States to re-define marriage so as to allow SSM, this at a time when sahdemy was a crime in virtually every State.  Don't give me any BS this time, just try to wreck my argument.  Let's see what you have besides name-calling and ad hominems.