text: "The content is serious and compelling. The arguments are grounded in reason, Scripture, and age-old Church teaching. The facts are not disputed."
  
  From your remarks it's clear that you side with the 62 and that is unfortunate because that is grounded in hate of changes that should have been made long ago or never should have been put in place from the start.
  
  One example:  Two married Catholics and one of them is a vile person.  
  They divorce because of that vileness, but the church will not allow the innocent person to remarry for as long as it takes to get an annulment and if that person does marry, he or she can not go to Communion.  In decades past that person was held in contempt by clergy and church members.  That is not what Jesus taught.