text: "VFJ's court advocates are only allowed to sit in court with the client and offer emotional support."
  Source?  Even the definition provided for "advocacy" indicates more than mere "emotional support" but "process of supporting a cause or proposal" so I don't get where you derive this marginalization of scope in "court advocacy" especially when that more reasonably falls under "accompaniment."  VFJ seems to consider the two distinct enough to list them as two different services, ie. "Court Advocacy and Accompaniment," yet you conflate the two together.