text: If you would have READ my response, which is based on experience and reality, you would have UNDERSTOOD that there are MYRIAD delaying tools that prosecutors have available and which they use with wanton frequency. It's cute, however, that you cite to the statute, yet you don't rely on the annotations and cited case law within the same statute.  Since you can't, or won't, I'll just go ahead and do it for you. 
  People V Guenther 740 P.2d 971 (1987) - procedural tolling allowed for newly proffered disclosures (sound familiar?) after erroneous finding of immunity
  893 P.2d 107 (1995) People V Vega - tolling allowed while the people examine evidence proffered for an affirmative defense offered by Vega
  946 P.2d 946 (1997) People V Gallegos - tolling allowed as the INTENT to appeal effectively counts towards the tolling prior to the states appeal, even when none is filed
  .... If I had more space, I'd keep going. See how your dishonesty (or inability) doesn't work. Facts v fiction - very :(