text: firstly, i deleted all the censorship comments except the original in a thread explaining my "error" - so i don't know why any of these are still posted.  diane dietz replied as well as another commenter - darn...can't remember which, and the upshot is when the guard puts the story in the paper, same story, updated...it starts a new comments section. except i've seen stories that have carried over with a few select comments.    - but that's her story and i'm sure she's got to stick to it...
   secondly ...it happens selectively and conveniently.  an example... an in -the- loop fellow businessman to the bakers gets dinged pretty bad in comments - put a "new story" in the paper-  words in different order basically is what it is and that first mess goes away.
  thirdly - the story i believed were the comments were being censored is the phil knight story..surprise! nike's projected revenue for 2017 is is projected to be $3.4 billion.  from memory because the comment is not in the thread now :O