Sync ParaSkill amplify-genuine-strengths
Browse files- LICENSE +21 -0
- README.md +56 -0
- SKILL.md +115 -0
- agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
LICENSE
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
MIT License
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
Copyright (c) 2026 bhxdianzhang
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
|
| 6 |
+
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
|
| 7 |
+
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
|
| 8 |
+
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
|
| 9 |
+
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
|
| 10 |
+
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
|
| 11 |
+
|
| 12 |
+
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
|
| 13 |
+
copies or substantial portions of the Software.
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
|
| 16 |
+
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
|
| 17 |
+
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
|
| 18 |
+
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
|
| 19 |
+
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
|
| 20 |
+
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
|
| 21 |
+
SOFTWARE.
|
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: mit
|
| 3 |
+
language:
|
| 4 |
+
- zh
|
| 5 |
+
- en
|
| 6 |
+
tags:
|
| 7 |
+
- codex-skill
|
| 8 |
+
- ai-agent
|
| 9 |
+
- scientific-writing
|
| 10 |
+
- research-workflow
|
| 11 |
+
- paraskill
|
| 12 |
+
- paradoxgpt
|
| 13 |
+
- writer
|
| 14 |
+
pretty_name: AmplifyGenuineStrengths
|
| 15 |
+
---
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
# AmplifyGenuineStrengths
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
`amplify-genuine-strengths` is a ParaSkill research workflow skill for the `writer` family.
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
## Purpose
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
Make the paper's REAL strengths visible to the reviewer — articulate them clearly and place them where they count. Grounded in ARGAR's finding that highlighting strengths is the stable, effective lever (impress > convince), but applied HONESTLY: only amplify strengths that are backed by evidence in the paper; flag any "strength" with no supporting evidence so it is NOT inflated. Output is a placement/phrasing plan, not a rewrite of evidence.
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
## Metadata
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
- Family: `writer`
|
| 28 |
+
- Owner model: `ParadoxGPT-Writer-4B`
|
| 29 |
+
- Output type: `revision`
|
| 30 |
+
- Version: `0.1`
|
| 31 |
+
- Default language: `zh`
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
## Included Files
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
```text
|
| 36 |
+
AmplifyGenuineStrengths/
|
| 37 |
+
SKILL.md
|
| 38 |
+
agents/openai.yaml
|
| 39 |
+
README.md
|
| 40 |
+
LICENSE
|
| 41 |
+
```
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+
`SKILL.md` is the executable skill instruction. `README.md` is the Hugging Face card.
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
## Installation
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
Copy this folder into a Codex-discoverable skills directory, or reference `SKILL.md` directly from an agent workflow.
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
```bash
|
| 50 |
+
mkdir -p ~/.codex/skills
|
| 51 |
+
cp -r AmplifyGenuineStrengths ~/.codex/skills/amplify-genuine-strengths
|
| 52 |
+
```
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
## Source
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
This skill is part of the ParaSkill library for ParadoxGPT. The full routing table is maintained in `SKILL_INDEX.json` in the source bundle.
|
SKILL.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
name: amplify-genuine-strengths
|
| 3 |
+
description: >-
|
| 4 |
+
Make the paper's REAL strengths visible to the reviewer — articulate them
|
| 5 |
+
clearly and place them where they count. Grounded in ARGAR's finding that
|
| 6 |
+
highlighting strengths is the stable, effective lever (impress > convince), but
|
| 7 |
+
applied HONESTLY: only amplify strengths that are backed by evidence in the
|
| 8 |
+
paper; flag any "strength" with no supporting evidence so it is NOT inflated.
|
| 9 |
+
Output is a placement/phrasing plan, not a rewrite of evidence.
|
| 10 |
+
metadata:
|
| 11 |
+
owner_model: ParadoxGPT-Writer-4B
|
| 12 |
+
skill_family: writer
|
| 13 |
+
version: "0.1"
|
| 14 |
+
output_type: revision
|
| 15 |
+
default_language: zh
|
| 16 |
+
trigger_keywords: [strength, strengths, highlight, 放大优点, contribution, selling point, impress, 卖点, contribution list]
|
| 17 |
+
required_inputs: [paper_context, strengths_evidence]
|
| 18 |
+
optional_inputs: [target_section]
|
| 19 |
+
handoff_to: [revise-by-criterion, enforce-content-preservation-zones, diagnose-aha-moment]
|
| 20 |
+
---
|
| 21 |
+
|
| 22 |
+
# Amplify Genuine Strengths
|
| 23 |
+
|
| 24 |
+
## Purpose
|
| 25 |
+
|
| 26 |
+
把论文**真实存在、有证据支撑**的优点,清楚地讲出来、放到该放的位置,让审稿人能看到。依据 ARGAR 的 strength-weakness asymmetry:**让 strengths 显眼是稳定有效的杠杆**(86.1% 的轮次有效,远超消 weakness)。但本 skill 只做诚实放大——无证据的"优点"必须标出、不得夸大,否则就是 ARGAR 揭露的 presentation gaming。
|
| 27 |
+
|
| 28 |
+
## When to Use
|
| 29 |
+
|
| 30 |
+
- 论文有真东西,但 strengths 被埋没、写得弱、或没放进 contribution list。
|
| 31 |
+
- 想在不加实验的前提下,让审稿人更容易看到价值。
|
| 32 |
+
- 投稿前把卖点显式化。
|
| 33 |
+
|
| 34 |
+
## Do Not Use
|
| 35 |
+
|
| 36 |
+
- 优点本身没证据支撑 → 不要放大(应转 `detect-presentation-gaming` 或补实验)。
|
| 37 |
+
- 想通过夸大措辞提升 perceived merit → 禁止(这是 gaming)。
|
| 38 |
+
- 需要改具体段落文本 → 用 `revise-by-criterion` 执行。
|
| 39 |
+
|
| 40 |
+
## Required Inputs
|
| 41 |
+
|
| 42 |
+
- `paper_context`: 全文(够定位证据)
|
| 43 |
+
- `strengths_evidence`: 候选优点清单,每条尽量带论文内证据(section/figure/数字)
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
## optional Inputs
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
- `target_section`: 想在哪里显眼化(abstract / intro contribution list / discussion)
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
## Output Contract
|
| 50 |
+
|
| 51 |
+
输出必须包含:
|
| 52 |
+
|
| 53 |
+
1. **genuine_strengths** — 每条:优点 + 论文内证据 + 当前是否被埋没。
|
| 54 |
+
2. **placement_plan** — 每条优点该出现在哪、怎么措辞(动词化、具体化,但不夸大)。
|
| 55 |
+
3. **unsupported_flags** — 无证据支撑、**不应**放大的"优点",标注原因(防 gaming)。
|
| 56 |
+
4. **protected_strengths** — 审稿人已认可的优点,后续修改不得削弱(ARGAR 的 protected 机制)。
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
## Procedure
|
| 59 |
+
|
| 60 |
+
1. 逐条核对 strengths_evidence 是否有论文内真实证据。
|
| 61 |
+
2. 有证据的 → 判断是否被埋没 → 给 placement + 措辞建议(具体、可核查,不堆 "novel/comprehensive")。
|
| 62 |
+
3. 无证据的 → 进 unsupported_flags,明确说不要放大。
|
| 63 |
+
4. 标出应被保护的已有优点。
|
| 64 |
+
|
| 65 |
+
## Quality Bar
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+
一个好的输出必须:
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
- 每条 genuine_strength 都指向论文内可核查的证据。
|
| 70 |
+
- 措辞建议是"把已有事实讲清楚",不是拔高。
|
| 71 |
+
- unsupported_flags 诚实标注,防止 gaming。
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
一个差的输出:
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
- 把无证据的点当优点放大。
|
| 76 |
+
- 用 "first/fundamental/comprehensive" 等词拔高。
|
| 77 |
+
- 笼统说"加强贡献"而不指具体证据。
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
## Failure Modes
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
- **strength inflation**:把局部结果包装成普遍贡献(= ARGAR 的 strength inflation,应转 `detect-presentation-gaming`)。
|
| 82 |
+
- **parroting self-positioning**:照搬论文自我标定词当优点。
|
| 83 |
+
- **削弱已认可优点**:改写时丢了 reviewer 认可的 strength。
|
| 84 |
+
|
| 85 |
+
## Handoff
|
| 86 |
+
|
| 87 |
+
- 要把 placement 落到具体段落文本 → `revise-by-criterion`
|
| 88 |
+
- 担心某条优点其实越界/无依据 → `enforce-content-preservation-zones`
|
| 89 |
+
- 想先诊断 strengths 是否对得上核心 realization → `diagnose-aha-moment`
|
| 90 |
+
|
| 91 |
+
## Example
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
Input:
|
| 94 |
+
|
| 95 |
+
```
|
| 96 |
+
paper_context: <interaction scaling 论文>
|
| 97 |
+
strengths_evidence:
|
| 98 |
+
- "长程任务曲线不饱和" (exp Fig2)
|
| 99 |
+
- "方法简单" (method)
|
| 100 |
+
target_section: introduction (contribution list)
|
| 101 |
+
```
|
| 102 |
+
|
| 103 |
+
Output(节选):
|
| 104 |
+
|
| 105 |
+
```
|
| 106 |
+
genuine_strengths:
|
| 107 |
+
- 优点: interaction scaling 带来不饱和提升。证据: Fig2 三任务曲线。当前: 埋在 exp,intro 未提。
|
| 108 |
+
- 优点: 机制简单(仅累积)。证据: method §3.2。当前: 未强调。
|
| 109 |
+
placement_plan:
|
| 110 |
+
- intro contribution list 第1条: "We show interaction rounds are a scalable resource,
|
| 111 |
+
yielding unsaturated gains on long-horizon tasks (Fig2)." —— 具体到 Fig2,不拔高。
|
| 112 |
+
- 第2条: "The gain is obtained by a simple accumulation mechanism." —— 如实。
|
| 113 |
+
unsupported_flags: []
|
| 114 |
+
protected_strengths: ["不饱和提升"] # 后续修改不得削弱
|
| 115 |
+
```
|
agents/openai.yaml
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
interface:
|
| 2 |
+
display_name: "Amplify Genuine Strengths"
|
| 3 |
+
short_description: "Make the paper's REAL strengths visible to the reviewer — articulate them clearly and plac"
|
| 4 |
+
default_prompt: "Use $amplify-genuine-strengths for this research-writing task."
|