Sync ParaSkill interactively-refine-idea
Browse files- LICENSE +21 -0
- README.md +56 -0
- SKILL.md +127 -0
- agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
LICENSE
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
MIT License
|
| 2 |
+
|
| 3 |
+
Copyright (c) 2026 bhxdianzhang
|
| 4 |
+
|
| 5 |
+
Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
|
| 6 |
+
of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
|
| 7 |
+
in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
|
| 8 |
+
to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
|
| 9 |
+
copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
|
| 10 |
+
furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
|
| 11 |
+
|
| 12 |
+
The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
|
| 13 |
+
copies or substantial portions of the Software.
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
|
| 16 |
+
IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
|
| 17 |
+
FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
|
| 18 |
+
AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
|
| 19 |
+
LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
|
| 20 |
+
OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
|
| 21 |
+
SOFTWARE.
|
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: mit
|
| 3 |
+
language:
|
| 4 |
+
- zh
|
| 5 |
+
- en
|
| 6 |
+
tags:
|
| 7 |
+
- codex-skill
|
| 8 |
+
- ai-agent
|
| 9 |
+
- scientific-writing
|
| 10 |
+
- research-workflow
|
| 11 |
+
- paraskill
|
| 12 |
+
- paradoxgpt
|
| 13 |
+
- creator
|
| 14 |
+
pretty_name: InteractivelyRefineIdea
|
| 15 |
+
---
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
# InteractivelyRefineIdea
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
`interactively-refine-idea` is a ParaSkill research workflow skill for the `creator` family.
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
## Purpose
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
Turn a vague research idea seed into a clearer research direction through clarification, axes, assumptions, risks, and next-step recommendations. Use when a user has an early idea and needs an idea partner rather than a list of ten brainstormed topics. Output is interactive guidance with questions and 2-3 concrete directions.
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
## Metadata
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
- Family: `creator`
|
| 28 |
+
- Owner model: `ParadoxGPT-Creator-4B`
|
| 29 |
+
- Output type: `interactive`
|
| 30 |
+
- Version: `0.1`
|
| 31 |
+
- Default language: `zh`
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
## Included Files
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
```text
|
| 36 |
+
InteractivelyRefineIdea/
|
| 37 |
+
SKILL.md
|
| 38 |
+
agents/openai.yaml
|
| 39 |
+
README.md
|
| 40 |
+
LICENSE
|
| 41 |
+
```
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+
`SKILL.md` is the executable skill instruction. `README.md` is the Hugging Face card.
|
| 44 |
+
|
| 45 |
+
## Installation
|
| 46 |
+
|
| 47 |
+
Copy this folder into a Codex-discoverable skills directory, or reference `SKILL.md` directly from an agent workflow.
|
| 48 |
+
|
| 49 |
+
```bash
|
| 50 |
+
mkdir -p ~/.codex/skills
|
| 51 |
+
cp -r InteractivelyRefineIdea ~/.codex/skills/interactively-refine-idea
|
| 52 |
+
```
|
| 53 |
+
|
| 54 |
+
## Source
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
This skill is part of the ParaSkill library for ParadoxGPT. The full routing table is maintained in `SKILL_INDEX.json` in the source bundle.
|
SKILL.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
name: interactively-refine-idea
|
| 3 |
+
description: >-
|
| 4 |
+
Turn a vague research idea seed into a clearer research direction through
|
| 5 |
+
clarification, axes, assumptions, risks, and next-step recommendations. Use
|
| 6 |
+
when a user has an early idea and needs an idea partner rather than a list of
|
| 7 |
+
ten brainstormed topics. Output is interactive guidance with questions and
|
| 8 |
+
2-3 concrete directions.
|
| 9 |
+
metadata:
|
| 10 |
+
owner_model: ParadoxGPT-Creator-4B
|
| 11 |
+
skill_family: creator
|
| 12 |
+
version: "0.1"
|
| 13 |
+
output_type: interactive
|
| 14 |
+
default_language: zh
|
| 15 |
+
trigger_keywords: [idea seed, refine idea, research direction, clarify, brainstorm, 交互, 科研想法, 创新]
|
| 16 |
+
required_inputs: [user_idea_seed]
|
| 17 |
+
optional_inputs: [constraints, research_context, target_venue, user_goal]
|
| 18 |
+
handoff_to: [generate-idea-variants, identify-fatal-concerns, map-claims-to-experiments, build-intro-argument-chain]
|
| 19 |
+
---
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
# Interactively Refine Idea
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
## Purpose
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
和用户一起把模糊想法推进成可写论文的 research direction。Creator 不应立刻生成十个点子,而要先澄清研究空间、关键假设、约束条件、风险和可验证路径。
|
| 26 |
+
|
| 27 |
+
## When to Use
|
| 28 |
+
|
| 29 |
+
- 用户说“我想做 X,但不知道怎么创新”。
|
| 30 |
+
- 用户有一个 seed,但没有清楚 gap、insight 或实验路径。
|
| 31 |
+
- 需要在 novelty、feasibility、evaluation risk 之间做取舍。
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
## Do Not Use
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
- 输入是一篇完整论文,要反推 idea → 用 `reverse-engineer-paper-idea`。
|
| 36 |
+
- 用户已经有明确 seed,只需要多个版本 → 用 `generate-idea-variants`。
|
| 37 |
+
- 需要完整实验计划 → 用 `map-claims-to-experiments` 或 Designer skill。
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
## Required Inputs
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
- `user_idea_seed`: 用户的模糊想法。
|
| 42 |
+
- `constraints`: optional,预算、模型规模、数据、时间、目标会议。
|
| 43 |
+
- `research_context`: optional,相关工作或已知背景。
|
| 44 |
+
- `target_venue`: optional。
|
| 45 |
+
|
| 46 |
+
## Output Contract
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
输出必须至少包含:
|
| 49 |
+
|
| 50 |
+
1. **clarifying_questions** - 先问 3-5 个关键问题。
|
| 51 |
+
2. **research_axes** - 把方向拆成可选择的轴。
|
| 52 |
+
3. **current_risk_reading** - novelty、feasibility、evaluation、claim risk。
|
| 53 |
+
4. **candidate_directions** - 2-3 个可推进方向,每个含 insight、method sketch、test。
|
| 54 |
+
5. **recommended_next_step** - 下一步最值得做什么。
|
| 55 |
+
|
| 56 |
+
## Procedure
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
1. 先复述 seed 的核心意图,不急着生成 idea。
|
| 59 |
+
2. 拆研究轴:对象、机制、评估、数据、约束、失败模式。
|
| 60 |
+
3. 找最可能被 reviewer 批的点,尤其是 novelty 和 evaluation。
|
| 61 |
+
4. 生成 2-3 个方向,每个方向必须有 tension、core insight 和验证路径。
|
| 62 |
+
5. 推荐一个下一步,说明为什么不是另外几个。
|
| 63 |
+
|
| 64 |
+
## Quality Bar
|
| 65 |
+
|
| 66 |
+
一个好的输出必须:
|
| 67 |
+
|
| 68 |
+
- 有交互感:先澄清,再提出方向。
|
| 69 |
+
- 不列 10 个泛泛 topic。
|
| 70 |
+
- 每个方向都能解释为什么 nontrivial 和怎么测。
|
| 71 |
+
- 推荐下一步考虑用户 constraints。
|
| 72 |
+
|
| 73 |
+
一个差的输出:
|
| 74 |
+
|
| 75 |
+
- 直接堆 brainstorm 列表。
|
| 76 |
+
- 只追求 novelty,忽略可实验性。
|
| 77 |
+
- 对 reviewer risk 没有预判。
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
## Failure Modes
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
- **过早收敛**:没问约束就选方案。
|
| 82 |
+
- **泛化方向**:方向像 grant topic,不像 paper idea。
|
| 83 |
+
- **忽视已有工作拥挤度**:热门方向 novelty 风险很高。
|
| 84 |
+
- **实验不可行**:idea 好听但用户资源无法验证。
|
| 85 |
+
|
| 86 |
+
## Handoff
|
| 87 |
+
|
| 88 |
+
- 如果用户要多个风险/成本版本 → `generate-idea-variants`
|
| 89 |
+
- 如果候选 idea 需要投稿前风险扫描 → `identify-fatal-concerns`
|
| 90 |
+
- 如果要把 idea 转成实验闭环 → `map-claims-to-experiments`
|
| 91 |
+
- 如果方向已定,需要写 intro 论证链 → `build-intro-argument-chain`
|
| 92 |
+
|
| 93 |
+
## Example
|
| 94 |
+
|
| 95 |
+
Input:
|
| 96 |
+
|
| 97 |
+
```
|
| 98 |
+
user_idea_seed: 我想做一个关于 LLM agent memory 的 idea,但不知道怎么创新。
|
| 99 |
+
constraints: 只能用 7B 以下模型,2 周实验。
|
| 100 |
+
```
|
| 101 |
+
|
| 102 |
+
Output:
|
| 103 |
+
|
| 104 |
+
```
|
| 105 |
+
clarifying_questions:
|
| 106 |
+
1. 你想优化 memory 的 representation、retrieval、update,还是 evaluation?
|
| 107 |
+
2. 目标 agent 是科研、代码、网页还是通用任务?
|
| 108 |
+
3. 你能否构造错误记忆或长期一致性测试?
|
| 109 |
+
|
| 110 |
+
research_axes:
|
| 111 |
+
- memory objective: recall-oriented vs argument-state-oriented
|
| 112 |
+
- update policy: append-only vs contradiction-aware
|
| 113 |
+
- evaluation: recall accuracy vs decision/evidence consistency
|
| 114 |
+
|
| 115 |
+
current_risk_reading:
|
| 116 |
+
novelty: high, memory-augmented agent 已很拥挤。
|
| 117 |
+
evaluation: high, 需要避免只做 toy recall。
|
| 118 |
+
|
| 119 |
+
candidate_directions:
|
| 120 |
+
D1: argument-state memory for research agents.
|
| 121 |
+
insight: 科研 agent 更需要维护 claim-decision-evidence 一致性,而不只是 recall。
|
| 122 |
+
method sketch: memory slot 存储 claim/evidence/status 三元组。
|
| 123 |
+
test: 构造跨轮 claim consistency benchmark。
|
| 124 |
+
|
| 125 |
+
recommended_next_step:
|
| 126 |
+
先做 D1 的低成本诊断 benchmark,确认现有 memory 系统是否真的在 argument consistency 上失败。
|
| 127 |
+
```
|
agents/openai.yaml
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
interface:
|
| 2 |
+
display_name: "Interactively Refine Idea"
|
| 3 |
+
short_description: "Turn a vague research idea seed into a clearer research direction through clarification, a"
|
| 4 |
+
default_prompt: "Use $interactively-refine-idea for this research-writing task."
|