| # Reviewer Path | |
| Start here: | |
| 1. Run `python3 scripts/smoke_test.py`. | |
| 2. Run `python3 scripts/scan_identity.py`. | |
| 3. Run `python3 scripts/score_contract.py examples/toy_predictions.jsonl examples/toy_targets.jsonl` to inspect answer parsing, box parsing, IoU, and Joint@0.5 mechanics on redistribution-safe toy rows. | |
| 4. Run `python3 scripts/recompute_bootstrap.py` and `python3 scripts/recompute_failure_taxonomy.py` to summarize reviewer-safe validation exports. | |
| 5. Open `croissant.json` and `metadata/rai_metadata.json`. | |
| 6. Inspect the frozen contract in `eval/frozen_downstream_eval_20260322/contract.json`. | |
| 7. Inspect paper-facing table exports under `eval/frozen_downstream_eval_20260322/analysis_20260326/paper_tables/`. | |
| 8. Inspect paired uncertainty in `eval/frozen_downstream_eval_20260322/analysis_20260326/bootstrap_report.md` and `pairwise_branch_comparisons.csv`. | |
| 9. Inspect tradeoff/failure summaries in `analysis/failure_taxonomy_primary_residual.csv`. | |
| 10. Inspect endpoint harshness diagnostics in `analysis/endpoint_diagnostics/`. | |
| The core branch comparison should be read as a within-contract measurement problem. Joint@0.5 is an intentionally strict exact-answer/single-box endpoint; it supports paired comparison under a frozen contract, not a calibrated clinical endpoint. | |
| The primary residual is source-ID-disjoint from the visible-rationale pool but is not verified at patient/study level. The supplemental VinDr diagnostic is not training-disjoint and is included only as a source-coverage diagnostic. | |