Kossisoroyce commited on
Commit
7def495
·
verified ·
1 Parent(s): 1958d32

Upload folder using huggingface_hub

Browse files
README.md ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ ---
2
+ license: cc-by-4.0
3
+ task_categories:
4
+ - tabular-classification
5
+ - regression
6
+ tags:
7
+ - governance
8
+ - anti-corruption
9
+ - accountability
10
+ - sub-saharan-africa
11
+ - synthetic
12
+ - lmic
13
+ - transparency
14
+ - enforcement
15
+ - public-sector
16
+ pretty_name: African Anti-Corruption Enforcement
17
+ size_categories:
18
+ - 10K<n<100K
19
+ configs:
20
+ - config_name: baseline
21
+ data_files: data/baseline.csv
22
+ - config_name: strengthened_enforcement
23
+ data_files: data/strengthened_enforcement.csv
24
+ - config_name: weakened_accountability
25
+ data_files: data/weakened_accountability.csv
26
+ ---
27
+
28
+ # African Anti-Corruption Enforcement
29
+
30
+ Synthetic dataset modelling anti-corruption enforcement outcomes across 12 Sub-Saharan African countries under three policy scenarios. Parameters are anchored to real-world statistics from Transparency International, the EFCC (Nigeria), SIU/Zondo Commission (South Africa), EACC (Kenya), the African Union's Common African Position on Asset Recovery, and the G20 2025 Accountability Report on Whistleblower Protection.
31
+
32
+ ## Dataset Summary
33
+
34
+ | Property | Value |
35
+ |---|---|
36
+ | Total records | 30,000 (10,000 per scenario) |
37
+ | Countries | 12 SSA nations |
38
+ | Variables | 15 per record |
39
+ | Scenarios | baseline, strengthened_enforcement, weakened_accountability |
40
+
41
+ ## Scenarios
42
+
43
+ - **baseline** – Calibrated to observed 2023–2025 enforcement statistics. Median prosecution rate ~25%, median asset recovery rate ~7%.
44
+ - **strengthened_enforcement** – Simulates higher agency independence (+18), stronger whistleblower protection (+20), increased prosecution (+45%), doubled asset recovery, and +8 CPI points.
45
+ - **weakened_accountability** – Models institutional erosion: agency independence −15, whistleblower protection −15, prosecution −40%, asset recovery −60%, and −10 CPI points.
46
+
47
+ ## Countries
48
+
49
+ Nigeria, South Africa, Kenya, Ghana, Tanzania, Uganda, Ethiopia, Senegal, Mozambique, Zambia, Rwanda, Botswana.
50
+
51
+ ## Variables
52
+
53
+ | Variable | Type | Description |
54
+ |---|---|---|
55
+ | `country` | str | Country name |
56
+ | `scenario` | str | Policy scenario |
57
+ | `corruption_perception_index` | float | TI CPI score (0–100, higher = cleaner) |
58
+ | `cases_investigated` | int | Number of corruption cases under investigation |
59
+ | `cases_prosecuted` | int | Cases forwarded to prosecution |
60
+ | `prosecution_rate` | float | cases_prosecuted / cases_investigated |
61
+ | `convictions` | int | Number of convictions secured |
62
+ | `conviction_rate` | float | convictions / cases_prosecuted |
63
+ | `assets_confiscated_usd_millions` | float | Value of confiscated assets (USD millions) |
64
+ | `asset_recovery_rate` | float | Fraction of estimated stolen assets recovered |
65
+ | `whistleblower_reports` | int | Number of whistleblower submissions |
66
+ | `whistleblower_protection_score` | float | Protection framework quality (0–100) |
67
+ | `agency_independence_score` | float | Anti-corruption agency independence (0–100) |
68
+ | `enforcement_effectiveness_score` | float | Composite effectiveness index (0–100) |
69
+ | `enforcement_class` | str | strong / moderate / weak |
70
+
71
+ ## Research Sources
72
+
73
+ 1. **Transparency International CPI 2025** – SSA average score 32/100; Seychelles (68) highest, Somalia/South Sudan (9) lowest.
74
+ 2. **EFCC Nigeria 2024** – 15,724 petitions → 12,928 investigated → 5,083 prosecuted → 4,111 convictions; $214.5M recovered.
75
+ 3. **South Africa SIU 2023/24** – 1,919 investigations closed, 583 criminal referrals, R8B saved, ~80% conviction rate in commercial cases.
76
+ 4. **Kenya EACC 2023/24** – 5,171 reports, 534 files under probe, 26.7% conviction rate, Ksh2.9B recovered.
77
+ 5. **AU Common African Position on Asset Recovery** – Africa loses ~$150B annually through illicit financial flows; asset recovery typically <10%.
78
+ 6. **G20 2025 Accountability Report on Whistleblower Protection** – Most SSA countries lack dedicated whistleblower legislation; protection gaps in developing countries.
79
+
80
+ ## Usage
81
+
82
+ ```python
83
+ from datasets import load_dataset
84
+
85
+ ds = load_dataset("electricsheepafrica/african-anti-corruption-enforcement", "baseline")
86
+ df = ds["train"].to_pandas()
87
+ ```
88
+
89
+ ## Generation & Validation
90
+
91
+ ```bash
92
+ pip install -r requirements.txt
93
+ python generate_dataset.py --scenario all --n-records 10000
94
+ python validate_dataset.py --data-dir data --plot-dir plots
95
+ ```
96
+
97
+ ## License
98
+
99
+ CC-BY-4.0
data/baseline.csv ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
data/strengthened_enforcement.csv ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
data/weakened_accountability.csv ADDED
The diff for this file is too large to render. See raw diff
 
generate_dataset.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,352 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ #!/usr/bin/env python3
2
+ """
3
+ African Anti-Corruption Enforcement Dataset Generator
4
+
5
+ Generates synthetic records for 12 Sub-Saharan African countries across
6
+ three enforcement scenarios. Parameters are informed by:
7
+ - Transparency International CPI 2025 (SSA avg=32, range 9-68)
8
+ - EFCC Nigeria 2024 statistics (12,928 investigated, 5,083 prosecuted,
9
+ 4,111 convictions, ~$214M recovered)
10
+ - South Africa SIU 2023/24 (1,919 investigations, 583 referrals,
11
+ R8B saved, ~80% conviction rate in commercial cases)
12
+ - Kenya EACC 2023/24 (5,171 reports, 534 under probe, 26.7% conviction
13
+ rate, Ksh2.9B recovered)
14
+ - AU Common African Position on Asset Recovery (asset recovery <10%)
15
+ - G20 2025 Accountability Report on Whistleblower Protection
16
+ """
17
+
18
+ import os
19
+ import argparse
20
+ import numpy as np
21
+ import pandas as pd
22
+ from scipy import stats
23
+
24
+ RNG_SEED = 42
25
+
26
+ # ── Country parameters ──────────────────────────────────────────────
27
+ # Based on TI CPI 2025, population, anti-corruption agency capacity,
28
+ # whistleblower protection maturity, and typical caseload volumes.
29
+ COUNTRIES = {
30
+ "Nigeria": {
31
+ "cpi_mean": 32, "cpi_std": 2.0,
32
+ "pop_millions": 220,
33
+ "agency_independence_mean": 42, "agency_independence_std": 8,
34
+ "whistleblower_protection_mean": 33, "whistleblower_protection_std": 7,
35
+ "cases_investigated_range": (10000, 18000), # EFCC 12,928 in 2024
36
+ "prosecution_rate_base": 0.35, # EFCC: 5,083/12,928 ≈ 39%
37
+ "conviction_rate_base": 0.72, # EFCC high conviction capacity
38
+ "asset_recovery_rate_base": 0.08,
39
+ "assets_usd_millions_range": (80, 250), # EFCC $214M in 2024
40
+ },
41
+ "South Africa": {
42
+ "cpi_mean": 43, "cpi_std": 2.5,
43
+ "pop_millions": 60,
44
+ "agency_independence_mean": 55, "agency_independence_std": 10,
45
+ "whistleblower_protection_mean": 48, "whistleblower_protection_std": 9,
46
+ "cases_investigated_range": (1800, 2800), # SIU 1,919 closed in 2023/24
47
+ "prosecution_rate_base": 0.28, # SIU 583 referrals from 1,919
48
+ "conviction_rate_base": 0.75, # NPA ~80% in commercial cases
49
+ "asset_recovery_rate_base": 0.12,
50
+ "assets_usd_millions_range": (100, 350), # SIU R8B ≈ $430M
51
+ },
52
+ "Kenya": {
53
+ "cpi_mean": 30, "cpi_std": 2.0,
54
+ "pop_millions": 55,
55
+ "agency_independence_mean": 38, "agency_independence_std": 7,
56
+ "whistleblower_protection_mean": 30, "whistleblower_protection_std": 6,
57
+ "cases_investigated_range": (4000, 6000), # EACC 5,171 reports
58
+ "prosecution_rate_base": 0.22, # EACC forwards to ODPP
59
+ "conviction_rate_base": 0.45, # EACC 26.7% (2023/24), improving
60
+ "asset_recovery_rate_base": 0.06,
61
+ "assets_usd_millions_range": (15, 40),
62
+ },
63
+ "Ghana": {
64
+ "cpi_mean": 43, "cpi_std": 2.5,
65
+ "pop_millions": 34,
66
+ "agency_independence_mean": 50, "agency_independence_std": 8,
67
+ "whistleblower_protection_mean": 40, "whistleblower_protection_std": 7,
68
+ "cases_investigated_range": (800, 1500),
69
+ "prosecution_rate_base": 0.30,
70
+ "conviction_rate_base": 0.55,
71
+ "asset_recovery_rate_base": 0.07,
72
+ "assets_usd_millions_range": (8, 30),
73
+ },
74
+ "Tanzania": {
75
+ "cpi_mean": 38, "cpi_std": 2.0,
76
+ "pop_millions": 65,
77
+ "agency_independence_mean": 35, "agency_independence_std": 7,
78
+ "whistleblower_protection_mean": 25, "whistleblower_protection_std": 6,
79
+ "cases_investigated_range": (2000, 4000),
80
+ "prosecution_rate_base": 0.25,
81
+ "conviction_rate_base": 0.60,
82
+ "asset_recovery_rate_base": 0.05,
83
+ "assets_usd_millions_range": (10, 35),
84
+ },
85
+ "Uganda": {
86
+ "cpi_mean": 26, "cpi_std": 2.0,
87
+ "pop_millions": 48,
88
+ "agency_independence_mean": 30, "agency_independence_std": 7,
89
+ "whistleblower_protection_mean": 22, "whistleblower_protection_std": 5,
90
+ "cases_investigated_range": (1500, 3000),
91
+ "prosecution_rate_base": 0.18,
92
+ "conviction_rate_base": 0.40,
93
+ "asset_recovery_rate_base": 0.04,
94
+ "assets_usd_millions_range": (5, 20),
95
+ },
96
+ "Ethiopia": {
97
+ "cpi_mean": 30, "cpi_std": 2.5,
98
+ "pop_millions": 120,
99
+ "agency_independence_mean": 28, "agency_independence_std": 8,
100
+ "whistleblower_protection_mean": 18, "whistleblower_protection_std": 5,
101
+ "cases_investigated_range": (1000, 2500),
102
+ "prosecution_rate_base": 0.15,
103
+ "conviction_rate_base": 0.50,
104
+ "asset_recovery_rate_base": 0.04,
105
+ "assets_usd_millions_range": (5, 25),
106
+ },
107
+ "Senegal": {
108
+ "cpi_mean": 46, "cpi_std": 2.0,
109
+ "pop_millions": 18,
110
+ "agency_independence_mean": 55, "agency_independence_std": 8,
111
+ "whistleblower_protection_mean": 42, "whistleblower_protection_std": 7,
112
+ "cases_investigated_range": (600, 1200),
113
+ "prosecution_rate_base": 0.32,
114
+ "conviction_rate_base": 0.55,
115
+ "asset_recovery_rate_base": 0.08,
116
+ "assets_usd_millions_range": (5, 20),
117
+ },
118
+ "Mozambique": {
119
+ "cpi_mean": 21, "cpi_std": 2.0,
120
+ "pop_millions": 33,
121
+ "agency_independence_mean": 22, "agency_independence_std": 6,
122
+ "whistleblower_protection_mean": 15, "whistleblower_protection_std": 4,
123
+ "cases_investigated_range": (300, 800),
124
+ "prosecution_rate_base": 0.12,
125
+ "conviction_rate_base": 0.35,
126
+ "asset_recovery_rate_base": 0.03,
127
+ "assets_usd_millions_range": (2, 10),
128
+ },
129
+ "Zambia": {
130
+ "cpi_mean": 33, "cpi_std": 2.0,
131
+ "pop_millions": 20,
132
+ "agency_independence_mean": 40, "agency_independence_std": 7,
133
+ "whistleblower_protection_mean": 28, "whistleblower_protection_std": 6,
134
+ "cases_investigated_range": (500, 1200),
135
+ "prosecution_rate_base": 0.20,
136
+ "conviction_rate_base": 0.45,
137
+ "asset_recovery_rate_base": 0.05,
138
+ "assets_usd_millions_range": (3, 15),
139
+ },
140
+ "Rwanda": {
141
+ "cpi_mean": 58, "cpi_std": 2.5,
142
+ "pop_millions": 14,
143
+ "agency_independence_mean": 65, "agency_independence_std": 8,
144
+ "whistleblower_protection_mean": 55, "whistleblower_protection_std": 8,
145
+ "cases_investigated_range": (400, 900),
146
+ "prosecution_rate_base": 0.45,
147
+ "conviction_rate_base": 0.70,
148
+ "asset_recovery_rate_base": 0.15,
149
+ "assets_usd_millions_range": (3, 12),
150
+ },
151
+ "Botswana": {
152
+ "cpi_mean": 58, "cpi_std": 2.5,
153
+ "pop_millions": 2.6,
154
+ "agency_independence_mean": 62, "agency_independence_std": 8,
155
+ "whistleblower_protection_mean": 50, "whistleblower_protection_std": 8,
156
+ "cases_investigated_range": (200, 500),
157
+ "prosecution_rate_base": 0.40,
158
+ "conviction_rate_base": 0.65,
159
+ "asset_recovery_rate_base": 0.12,
160
+ "assets_usd_millions_range": (2, 8),
161
+ },
162
+ }
163
+
164
+ SCENARIOS = {
165
+ "baseline": {
166
+ "cpi_shift": 0,
167
+ "agency_shift": 0,
168
+ "whistleblower_shift": 0,
169
+ "prosecution_multiplier": 1.0,
170
+ "conviction_multiplier": 1.0,
171
+ "asset_recovery_multiplier": 1.0,
172
+ "investigated_multiplier": 1.0,
173
+ },
174
+ "strengthened_enforcement": {
175
+ "cpi_shift": 8, # +8 points on CPI
176
+ "agency_shift": 18, # +18 on independence score
177
+ "whistleblower_shift": 20, # +20 on protection score
178
+ "prosecution_multiplier": 1.45,
179
+ "conviction_multiplier": 1.15,
180
+ "asset_recovery_multiplier": 2.0,
181
+ "investigated_multiplier": 1.25,
182
+ },
183
+ "weakened_accountability": {
184
+ "cpi_shift": -10,
185
+ "agency_shift": -15,
186
+ "whistleblower_shift": -15,
187
+ "prosecution_multiplier": 0.60,
188
+ "conviction_multiplier": 0.80,
189
+ "asset_recovery_multiplier": 0.40,
190
+ "investigated_multiplier": 0.70,
191
+ },
192
+ }
193
+
194
+
195
+ def clamp(x, lo, hi):
196
+ return np.clip(x, lo, hi)
197
+
198
+
199
+ def generate_country_scenario(country_name, params, scenario_name, scenario_params, n_records, rng):
200
+ """Generate n_records for one country under one scenario."""
201
+
202
+ # ── Scores derived from scenario ──
203
+ cpi = rng.normal(
204
+ params["cpi_mean"] + scenario_params["cpi_shift"],
205
+ params["cpi_std"], n_records
206
+ )
207
+ cpi = clamp(cpi, 0, 100)
208
+
209
+ agency_independence = rng.normal(
210
+ params["agency_independence_mean"] + scenario_params["agency_shift"],
211
+ params["agency_independence_std"], n_records
212
+ )
213
+ agency_independence = clamp(agency_independence, 0, 100)
214
+
215
+ whistleblower_protection = rng.normal(
216
+ params["whistleblower_protection_mean"] + scenario_params["whistleblower_shift"],
217
+ params["whistleblower_protection_std"], n_records
218
+ )
219
+ whistleblower_protection = clamp(whistleblower_protection, 0, 100)
220
+
221
+ # ── Cases investigated (population-scaled) ──
222
+ pop_scale = params["pop_millions"] / 60 # normalise to SA baseline
223
+ inv_lo, inv_hi = params["cases_investigated_range"]
224
+ inv_base = rng.uniform(inv_lo * pop_scale, inv_hi * pop_scale, n_records)
225
+ cases_investigated = np.round(
226
+ inv_base * scenario_params["investigated_multiplier"]
227
+ ).astype(int)
228
+ cases_investigated = np.maximum(cases_investigated, 10)
229
+
230
+ # ── Prosecution rate (correlated with agency independence) ──
231
+ prot_base = params["prosecution_rate_base"] * scenario_params["prosecution_multiplier"]
232
+ # Agency independence boosts prosecution rate
233
+ agency_effect = (agency_independence - 50) / 500 # ±0.1 shift
234
+ prosecution_rate = prot_base + agency_effect + rng.normal(0, 0.04, n_records)
235
+ prosecution_rate = clamp(prosecution_rate, 0.02, 0.85)
236
+
237
+ cases_prosecuted = np.round(cases_investigated * prosecution_rate).astype(int)
238
+ cases_prosecuted = np.minimum(cases_prosecuted, cases_investigated)
239
+ cases_prosecuted = np.maximum(cases_prosecuted, 0)
240
+
241
+ # ── Conviction rate ─���
242
+ conv_base = params["conviction_rate_base"] * scenario_params["conviction_multiplier"]
243
+ conv_rate = conv_base + rng.normal(0, 0.06, n_records)
244
+ conv_rate = clamp(conv_rate, 0.05, 0.95)
245
+
246
+ convictions = np.round(cases_prosecuted * conv_rate).astype(int)
247
+ convictions = np.minimum(convictions, cases_prosecuted)
248
+ convictions = np.maximum(convictions, 0)
249
+
250
+ # ── Asset confiscation ──
251
+ asset_lo, asset_hi = params["assets_usd_millions_range"]
252
+ assets_confiscated = rng.uniform(asset_lo, asset_hi, n_records) * scenario_params["asset_recovery_multiplier"]
253
+ assets_confiscated = np.maximum(assets_confiscated, 0.1)
254
+
255
+ asset_recovery_rate = params["asset_recovery_rate_base"] * scenario_params["asset_recovery_multiplier"]
256
+ asset_recovery_rate = clamp(
257
+ asset_recovery_rate + rng.normal(0, 0.02, n_records), 0.01, 0.50
258
+ )
259
+
260
+ # ── Whistleblower reports ──
261
+ wb_base = cases_investigated * rng.uniform(0.3, 0.8, n_records)
262
+ wb_effect = 1 + (whistleblower_protection - 30) / 100
263
+ whistleblower_reports = np.round(wb_base * wb_effect).astype(int)
264
+ whistleblower_reports = np.maximum(whistleblower_reports, 0)
265
+
266
+ # ── Enforcement effectiveness composite ──
267
+ enforcement_effectiveness = (
268
+ 0.25 * (prosecution_rate / 0.5) +
269
+ 0.25 * (conv_rate / 0.8) +
270
+ 0.20 * (asset_recovery_rate / 0.15) +
271
+ 0.15 * (agency_independence / 100) +
272
+ 0.15 * (whistleblower_protection / 100)
273
+ ) * 100
274
+ enforcement_effectiveness = clamp(enforcement_effectiveness, 0, 100)
275
+
276
+ # ── Enforcement class ──
277
+ enforcement_class = np.where(
278
+ enforcement_effectiveness >= 60, "strong",
279
+ np.where(enforcement_effectiveness >= 35, "moderate", "weak")
280
+ )
281
+
282
+ # ── Build DataFrame ──
283
+ df = pd.DataFrame({
284
+ "country": country_name,
285
+ "scenario": scenario_name,
286
+ "corruption_perception_index": np.round(cpi, 1),
287
+ "cases_investigated": cases_investigated,
288
+ "cases_prosecuted": cases_prosecuted,
289
+ "prosecution_rate": np.round(prosecution_rate, 4),
290
+ "convictions": convictions,
291
+ "conviction_rate": np.round(conv_rate, 4),
292
+ "assets_confiscated_usd_millions": np.round(assets_confiscated, 2),
293
+ "asset_recovery_rate": np.round(asset_recovery_rate, 4),
294
+ "whistleblower_reports": whistleblower_reports,
295
+ "whistleblower_protection_score": np.round(whistleblower_protection, 1),
296
+ "agency_independence_score": np.round(agency_independence, 1),
297
+ "enforcement_effectiveness_score": np.round(enforcement_effectiveness, 1),
298
+ "enforcement_class": enforcement_class,
299
+ })
300
+ return df
301
+
302
+
303
+ def generate_dataset(scenario, n_per_country=834, seed=RNG_SEED):
304
+ """Generate full dataset for one scenario across all 12 countries."""
305
+ rng = np.random.default_rng(seed)
306
+ scenario_params = SCENARIOS[scenario]
307
+ frames = []
308
+ for country_name, params in COUNTRIES.items():
309
+ df = generate_country_scenario(
310
+ country_name, params, scenario, scenario_params, n_per_country, rng
311
+ )
312
+ frames.append(df)
313
+ full = pd.concat(frames, ignore_index=True)
314
+ # Shuffle
315
+ full = full.sample(frac=1, random_state=seed).reset_index(drop=True)
316
+ return full
317
+
318
+
319
+ def main():
320
+ parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description="Generate anti-corruption enforcement dataset")
321
+ parser.add_argument("--scenario", type=str, default="all",
322
+ choices=list(SCENARIOS.keys()) + ["all"])
323
+ parser.add_argument("--n-records", type=int, default=10000,
324
+ help="Total records per scenario (split across 12 countries)")
325
+ parser.add_argument("--output-dir", type=str, default="data")
326
+ args = parser.parse_args()
327
+
328
+ os.makedirs(args.output_dir, exist_ok=True)
329
+ scenarios = list(SCENARIOS.keys()) if args.scenario == "all" else [args.scenario]
330
+
331
+ for scen in scenarios:
332
+ n_per_country = args.n_records // len(COUNTRIES)
333
+ remainder = args.n_records - n_per_country * len(COUNTRIES)
334
+ df = generate_dataset(scen, n_per_country=n_per_country)
335
+ # Add extra records to first country to hit exact count
336
+ if remainder > 0:
337
+ rng = np.random.default_rng(RNG_SEED + 99)
338
+ extra = generate_country_scenario(
339
+ list(COUNTRIES.keys())[0],
340
+ COUNTRIES[list(COUNTRIES.keys())[0]],
341
+ scen, SCENARIOS[scen], remainder, rng
342
+ )
343
+ df = pd.concat([df, extra], ignore_index=True)
344
+ df = df.sample(frac=1, random_state=RNG_SEED).reset_index(drop=True)
345
+
346
+ out_path = os.path.join(args.output_dir, f"{scen}.csv")
347
+ df.to_csv(out_path, index=False)
348
+ print(f"Generated {len(df)} records → {out_path}")
349
+
350
+
351
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
352
+ main()
plots/diagnostic_panels.png ADDED

Git LFS Details

  • SHA256: 2d1075cc4a0fb2ec9fe5634a33c25444a626dbbd0a74c64d9aafca87dd707111
  • Pointer size: 132 Bytes
  • Size of remote file: 1.02 MB
requirements.txt ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ numpy>=1.24
2
+ pandas>=2.0
3
+ scipy>=1.10
4
+ matplotlib>=3.7
validate_dataset.py ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
+ #!/usr/bin/env python3
2
+ """
3
+ Validate African Anti-Corruption Enforcement dataset.
4
+
5
+ Runs plausibility checks and produces 8-panel diagnostic plots.
6
+ """
7
+
8
+ import os
9
+ import sys
10
+ import argparse
11
+ import numpy as np
12
+ import pandas as pd
13
+ import matplotlib
14
+ matplotlib.use("Agg")
15
+ import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
16
+
17
+ DATA_DIR = "data"
18
+ PLOT_DIR = "plots"
19
+
20
+ SCENARIOS = ["baseline", "strengthened_enforcement", "weakened_accountability"]
21
+
22
+
23
+ def load_data(data_dir):
24
+ frames = {}
25
+ for scen in SCENARIOS:
26
+ path = os.path.join(data_dir, f"{scen}.csv")
27
+ if not os.path.exists(path):
28
+ print(f"WARNING: {path} not found, skipping")
29
+ continue
30
+ frames[scen] = pd.read_csv(path)
31
+ return frames
32
+
33
+
34
+ # ── Plausibility checks ─────────────────────────────────────────────
35
+
36
+ def run_checks(frames):
37
+ issues = []
38
+ for scen, df in frames.items():
39
+ n = len(df)
40
+ print(f"\n{'='*60}")
41
+ print(f"Scenario: {scen} ({n} records)")
42
+ print(f"{'='*60}")
43
+
44
+ # 1. Record count
45
+ assert n == 10000, f"Expected 10000 records, got {n}"
46
+ print(f" [OK] Record count: {n}")
47
+
48
+ # 2. Country coverage
49
+ countries = df["country"].nunique()
50
+ assert countries == 12, f"Expected 12 countries, got {countries}"
51
+ print(f" [OK] Country coverage: {countries}")
52
+
53
+ # 3. CPI range
54
+ cpi_ok = df["corruption_perception_index"].between(0, 100).all()
55
+ print(f" [{'OK' if cpi_ok else 'FAIL'}] CPI in [0,100]: "
56
+ f"{df['corruption_perception_index'].min():.1f} – "
57
+ f"{df['corruption_perception_index'].max():.1f}")
58
+ if not cpi_ok:
59
+ issues.append(f"{scen}: CPI out of range")
60
+
61
+ # 4. Rates in [0, 1]
62
+ for col in ["prosecution_rate", "conviction_rate", "asset_recovery_rate"]:
63
+ r_ok = df[col].between(0, 1).all()
64
+ print(f" [{'OK' if r_ok else 'FAIL'}] {col} in [0,1]: "
65
+ f"{df[col].min():.4f} – {df[col].max():.4f}")
66
+ if not r_ok:
67
+ issues.append(f"{scen}: {col} out of range")
68
+
69
+ # 5. Scores in [0, 100]
70
+ for col in ["whistleblower_protection_score", "agency_independence_score",
71
+ "enforcement_effectiveness_score"]:
72
+ s_ok = df[col].between(0, 100).all()
73
+ print(f" [{'OK' if s_ok else 'FAIL'}] {col} in [0,100]: "
74
+ f"{df[col].min():.1f} – {df[col].max():.1f}")
75
+ if not s_ok:
76
+ issues.append(f"{scen}: {col} out of range")
77
+
78
+ # 6. Monotonicity: prosecuted <= investigated
79
+ mono_ok = (df["cases_prosecuted"] <= df["cases_investigated"]).all()
80
+ print(f" [{'OK' if mono_ok else 'FAIL'}] cases_prosecuted <= cases_investigated")
81
+ if not mono_ok:
82
+ issues.append(f"{scen}: prosecution > investigation")
83
+
84
+ # 7. convictions <= cases_prosecuted
85
+ conv_ok = (df["convictions"] <= df["cases_prosecuted"]).all()
86
+ print(f" [{'OK' if conv_ok else 'FAIL'}] convictions <= cases_prosecuted")
87
+ if not conv_ok:
88
+ issues.append(f"{scen}: convictions > prosecuted")
89
+
90
+ # 8. Enforcement class consistency
91
+ class_ok = set(df["enforcement_class"].unique()) <= {"strong", "moderate", "weak"}
92
+ print(f" [{'OK' if class_ok else 'FAIL'}] enforcement_class values valid")
93
+
94
+ # 9. SSA-typical prosecution rate (<60% for most)
95
+ median_prosec = df["prosecution_rate"].median()
96
+ print(f" [INFO] Median prosecution rate: {median_prosec:.3f}")
97
+
98
+ # 10. SSA-typical asset recovery (<30%)
99
+ median_asset = df["asset_recovery_rate"].median()
100
+ print(f" [INFO] Median asset recovery rate: {median_asset:.3f}")
101
+
102
+ # 11. Summary stats by country
103
+ print(f"\n Country-level median CPI:")
104
+ for c, g in df.groupby("country"):
105
+ print(f" {c:15s} CPI={g['corruption_perception_index'].median():5.1f} "
106
+ f"prosec_rate={g['prosecution_rate'].median():.3f} "
107
+ f"conv_rate={g['conviction_rate'].median():.3f}")
108
+
109
+ if issues:
110
+ print(f"\n{'!'*60}")
111
+ print(f"ISSUES FOUND ({len(issues)}):")
112
+ for iss in issues:
113
+ print(f" - {iss}")
114
+ else:
115
+ print(f"\n{'='*60}")
116
+ print("ALL CHECKS PASSED")
117
+ return issues
118
+
119
+
120
+ # ── Diagnostic plots ────────────────────────────────────────────────
121
+
122
+ def make_plots(frames, plot_dir):
123
+ os.makedirs(plot_dir, exist_ok=True)
124
+ fig, axes = plt.subplots(2, 4, figsize=(24, 12))
125
+ fig.suptitle("African Anti-Corruption Enforcement – Diagnostic Plots",
126
+ fontsize=16, fontweight="bold", y=1.01)
127
+
128
+ palette = {"baseline": "#2166ac",
129
+ "strengthened_enforcement": "#1a9641",
130
+ "weakened_accountability": "#d73027"}
131
+
132
+ # ── Panel 1: CPI distribution by scenario ──
133
+ ax = axes[0, 0]
134
+ for scen, df in frames.items():
135
+ ax.hist(df["corruption_perception_index"], bins=40, alpha=0.5,
136
+ label=scen.replace("_", " "), color=palette[scen], density=True)
137
+ ax.set_xlabel("Corruption Perception Index")
138
+ ax.set_ylabel("Density")
139
+ ax.set_title("(a) CPI Distribution")
140
+ ax.legend(fontsize=7)
141
+
142
+ # ── Panel 2: Prosecution rate by country ──
143
+ ax = axes[0, 1]
144
+ country_order = sorted(frames["baseline"]["country"].unique())
145
+ data_baseline = [frames["baseline"].loc[frames["baseline"]["country"] == c,
146
+ "prosecution_rate"].values for c in country_order]
147
+ bp = ax.boxplot(data_baseline, labels=[c[:6] for c in country_order],
148
+ patch_artist=True, showfliers=False)
149
+ for patch in bp["boxes"]:
150
+ patch.set_facecolor("#abd9e9")
151
+ ax.set_ylabel("Prosecution Rate")
152
+ ax.set_title("(b) Prosecution Rate (Baseline)")
153
+ ax.tick_params(axis="x", rotation=45)
154
+
155
+ # ── Panel 3: Conviction rate by scenario ──
156
+ ax = axes[0, 2]
157
+ conv_data = []
158
+ labels = []
159
+ for scen in SCENARIOS:
160
+ if scen in frames:
161
+ conv_data.append(frames[scen]["conviction_rate"].values)
162
+ labels.append(scen.replace("_", "\n"))
163
+ bp2 = ax.boxplot(conv_data, labels=labels, patch_artist=True, showfliers=False)
164
+ colors = [palette[s] for s in SCENARIOS if s in frames]
165
+ for patch, color in zip(bp2["boxes"], colors):
166
+ patch.set_facecolor(color)
167
+ patch.set_alpha(0.6)
168
+ ax.set_ylabel("Conviction Rate")
169
+ ax.set_title("(c) Conviction Rate by Scenario")
170
+
171
+ # ── Panel 4: Asset recovery vs CPI ──
172
+ ax = axes[0, 3]
173
+ for scen, df in frames.items():
174
+ sample = df.sample(min(2000, len(df)), random_state=42)
175
+ ax.scatter(sample["corruption_perception_index"],
176
+ sample["asset_recovery_rate"] * 100,
177
+ alpha=0.15, s=8, color=palette[scen], label=scen.replace("_", " "))
178
+ ax.set_xlabel("CPI")
179
+ ax.set_ylabel("Asset Recovery Rate (%)")
180
+ ax.set_title("(d) Asset Recovery vs CPI")
181
+ ax.legend(fontsize=7)
182
+
183
+ # ── Panel 5: Enforcement effectiveness by country ──
184
+ ax = axes[1, 0]
185
+ means = frames["baseline"].groupby("country")["enforcement_effectiveness_score"].mean()
186
+ means = means.sort_values()
187
+ bars = ax.barh([c[:10] for c in means.index], means.values, color="#4393c3")
188
+ ax.set_xlabel("Mean Enforcement Effectiveness Score")
189
+ ax.set_title("(e) Enforcement Effectiveness (Baseline)")
190
+
191
+ # ── Panel 6: Whistleblower reports vs protection score ──
192
+ ax = axes[1, 1]
193
+ for scen, df in frames.items():
194
+ sample = df.sample(min(2000, len(df)), random_state=42)
195
+ ax.scatter(sample["whistleblower_protection_score"],
196
+ sample["whistleblower_reports"],
197
+ alpha=0.12, s=8, color=palette[scen])
198
+ ax.set_xlabel("Whistleblower Protection Score")
199
+ ax.set_ylabel("Whistleblower Reports")
200
+ ax.set_title("(f) WB Reports vs Protection")
201
+
202
+ # ── Panel 7: Prosecution pipeline (log scale) ──
203
+ ax = axes[1, 2]
204
+ for scen, df in frames.items():
205
+ med = df[["cases_investigated", "cases_prosecuted", "convictions"]].median()
206
+ ax.plot(["Investigated", "Prosecuted", "Convicted"],
207
+ med.values, marker="o", linewidth=2,
208
+ color=palette[scen], label=scen.replace("_", " "))
209
+ ax.set_ylabel("Median Cases (log)")
210
+ ax.set_yscale("log")
211
+ ax.set_title("(g) Prosecution Pipeline")
212
+ ax.legend(fontsize=7)
213
+
214
+ # ── Panel 8: Agency independence vs prosecution rate ──
215
+ ax = axes[1, 3]
216
+ for scen, df in frames.items():
217
+ sample = df.sample(min(2000, len(df)), random_state=42)
218
+ ax.scatter(sample["agency_independence_score"],
219
+ sample["prosecution_rate"] * 100,
220
+ alpha=0.12, s=8, color=palette[scen])
221
+ ax.set_xlabel("Agency Independence Score")
222
+ ax.set_ylabel("Prosecution Rate (%)")
223
+ ax.set_title("(h) Agency Independence vs Prosecution")
224
+
225
+ plt.tight_layout()
226
+ out_path = os.path.join(plot_dir, "diagnostic_panels.png")
227
+ fig.savefig(out_path, dpi=150, bbox_inches="tight")
228
+ plt.close(fig)
229
+ print(f"\nDiagnostic plots saved → {out_path}")
230
+
231
+
232
+ def main():
233
+ parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
234
+ parser.add_argument("--data-dir", default=DATA_DIR)
235
+ parser.add_argument("--plot-dir", default=PLOT_DIR)
236
+ args = parser.parse_args()
237
+
238
+ frames = load_data(args.data_dir)
239
+ if not frames:
240
+ print("No data files found. Run generate_dataset.py first.")
241
+ sys.exit(1)
242
+
243
+ issues = run_checks(frames)
244
+ make_plots(frames, args.plot_dir)
245
+
246
+ if issues:
247
+ sys.exit(1)
248
+
249
+
250
+ if __name__ == "__main__":
251
+ main()