--- license: mit task_categories: - image-to-image - image-segmentation - image-classification - image-feature-extraction - zero-shot-image-classification tags: - holography - hologram - inline-holography - inline - reconstruction - synthetic - signal pretty_name: Synthetic Inline Holographical Images v3 (224px Highly Diverse) size_categories: - 10K Real, Imag ``` --- ## Dataset Creation ### Curation Rationale Inline holography involves recording the interference pattern between an object wave and a reference wave. However, collecting large, labelled datasets in laboratory conditions is impractical due to optical setup complexity and noise factors. This dataset provides a **synthetic, physically consistent alternative** that mimics realistic propagation physics using scalar diffraction models. ### Source Data #### Data Collection and Processing Images were generated using numerical wave propagation based on the **Angular Spectrum Method (ASM)**, as implemented in the [Hologen](https://github.com/electricalgorithm/hologen) framework. Objects were synthetically generated using shape primitives, textures, and random phase and amplitude patterns. Each object was propagated through a simulated inline holography setup to produce hologram and reconstruction pairs. #### Who are the source data producers? - All data were generated algorithmically by Gökhan Koçmarlı using simulation code in *Hologen*. - No external or third-party datasets were used. --- ### Annotations No manual annotations are included. Each triplet is automatically labelled by filename correspondence. #### Annotation process Not applicable (fully synthetic, self-labelled data). #### Who are the annotators? All data is generated programmatically. #### Personal and Sensitive Information This dataset contains **no personal, identifiable, or sensitive information**. All images are synthetic and algorithmically generated. --- ## Bias, Risks, and Limitations - As the dataset is fully synthetic, it lacks real-world optical aberrations, noise, and coherence effects that occur in experimental holography. - Models trained purely on this dataset may require fine-tuning on physical hologram data to generalise effectively. - The dataset assumes ideal optical parameters (e.g., monochromatic light, planar sensor). --- ### Recommendations Users should consider: - Augmenting with noise or real holograms for domain adaptation. - Interpreting reconstruction metrics (e.g., PSNR, SSIM) relative to synthetic references. - Avoiding conclusions about physical accuracy without experimental validation. --- ## Article is out! Read HoloPASWIN: Robust Inline Holographic Reconstruction via Physics-Aware Swin Transformers Please find the article proposing deep learning model that uses the dataset to resolve twin-image and noises for holographical backword propogation: [https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04926](https://arxiv.org/abs/2603.04926) ## Citation **BibTeX:** ```bibtex @dataset{kochmarla2026synthetic_inline_holographical_images_v3, author = {Gökhan Koçmarlı}, title = {Synthetic Inline Holographical Images v3 (224px Highly Diverse)}, year = {2026}, url = {https://huggingface.co/datasets/electricalgorithm/inline-digital-holography-v3}, note = {Synthetic dataset for inline holography simulation and reconstruction. Optimized for ViT inputs.} } ```