Datasets:
Tasks:
Text Generation
Modalities:
Text
Sub-tasks:
language-modeling
Languages:
English
Size:
100K - 1M
License:
Download books/stacks/exercises.tex from hoskinson-center/proof-pile: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 232 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/hoskinson-center/proof-pile/resolve/0443587416a1dfc2eee009ee18cfe4fda4e3ffb3/books/stacks/exercises.tex
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/hoskinson-center/proof-pile@0443587416a1dfc2eee009ee18cfe4fda4e3ffb3/books/stacks/exercises.tex
-
curl -L -o exercises.tex https://huggingface.co/datasets/hoskinson-center/proof-pile/resolve/0443587416a1dfc2eee009ee18cfe4fda4e3ffb3/books/stacks/exercises.tex
232 kB
| \input{preamble} | |
| % OK, start here. | |
| % | |
| \begin{document} | |
| \title{Exercises} | |
| \maketitle | |
| \phantomsection | |
| \label{section-phantom} | |
| \tableofcontents | |
| \section{Algebra} | |
| \label{section-algebra} | |
| \noindent | |
| This first section just contains some assorted questions. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-isomorphism-localizations} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring, and ${\mathfrak m}$ a maximal ideal. In $A[X]$ | |
| let $\tilde {\mathfrak m}_1 = ({\mathfrak m}, X)$ and | |
| $\tilde {\mathfrak m}_2 = ({\mathfrak m}, X-1)$. Show | |
| that | |
| $$ | |
| A[X]_{\tilde {\mathfrak m}_1} \cong A[X]_{\tilde {\mathfrak m}_2}. | |
| $$ | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-coherent} | |
| Find an example of a non Noetherian ring $R$ such that every | |
| finitely generated ideal of $R$ is finitely presented as an $R$-module. | |
| (A ring is said to be {\it coherent} if the last property holds.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-flat-ideals-pid} | |
| Suppose that $(A, {\mathfrak m}, k)$ is a Noetherian local ring. For any | |
| finite $A$-module $M$ define $r(M)$ to be the minimum number | |
| of generators of $M$ as an $A$-module. This number equals | |
| $\dim_k M/{\mathfrak m} M = \dim_k M \otimes_A k$ by NAK. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that $r(M \otimes_A N) = r(M)r(N)$. | |
| \item Let $I\subset A $ be an ideal with $r(I) > 1$. Show that | |
| $r(I^2) < r(I)^2$. | |
| \item Conclude that if every ideal in $A$ is a flat module, then | |
| $A$ is a PID (or a field). | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-not-isomorphic} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Show that the following pairs of | |
| $k$-algebras are not isomorphic: | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $k[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ and $k[x_1, \ldots, x_{n + 1}]$ for any | |
| $n\geq 1$. | |
| \item $k[a, b, c, d, e, f]/(ab + cd + ef)$ and $k[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ | |
| for $n = 5$. | |
| \item $k[a, b, c, d, e, f]/(ab + cd + ef)$ and $k[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ | |
| for $n = 6$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-simple-geometric} | |
| Of course the idea of this exercise is to find | |
| a simple argument in each case rather than applying a ``big'' theorem. | |
| Nonetheless it is good to be guided by general principles. | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-silly} | |
| Algebra. (Silly and should be easy.) | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Give an example of a ring $A$ and a nonsplit | |
| short exact sequence of $A$-modules | |
| $$ | |
| 0 \to M_1 \to M_2 \to M_3 \to 0. | |
| $$ | |
| \item Give an example of a nonsplit sequence of $A$-modules | |
| as above and a faithfully flat $A \to B$ such that | |
| $$ | |
| 0 \to M_1\otimes_A B \to M_2\otimes_A B \to M_3\otimes_A B \to 0. | |
| $$ | |
| is split as a sequence of $B$-modules. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-field-kummer} | |
| Suppose that $k$ is a field having a primitive $n$th root | |
| of unity $\zeta$. This means that $\zeta^n = 1$, but $\zeta^m\not = 1$ for | |
| $0 < m < n$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that the characteristic of $k$ is prime to $n$. | |
| \item Suppose that $a \in k$ is an element of $k$ which is not | |
| an $d$th power in $k$ for any divisor $d$ of $n$ for $n \geq d > 1$. Show that | |
| $k[x]/(x^n-a)$ is a field. (Hint: Consider a splitting field for | |
| $x^n-a$ and use Galois theory.) | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-valuation} | |
| Let $\nu : k[x]\setminus \{0\} \to {\mathbf Z}$ be a map | |
| with the following properties: $\nu(fg) = \nu(f) + \nu(g)$ whenever | |
| $f$, $g$ not zero, and $\nu(f + g) \geq min(\nu(f), \nu(g))$ whenever | |
| $f$, $g$, $f + g$ are not zero, and $\nu(c) = 0$ for all $c\in k^*$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that if $f$, $g$, and $f + g$ are nonzero and | |
| $\nu(f) \not = \nu(g)$ then we have equality $\nu(f + g) = min(\nu(f), \nu(g))$. | |
| \item Show that if $f = \sum a_i x^i$, $f\not = 0$, then | |
| $\nu(f) \geq min(\{i\nu(x)\}_{a_i\not = 0})$. When does equality hold? | |
| \item Show that if $\nu$ attains a negative value then | |
| $\nu(f) = -n \deg(f)$ for some $n\in {\mathbf N}$. | |
| \item Suppose $\nu(x) \geq 0$. Show that | |
| $\{f \mid f = 0, \ or\ \nu(f) > 0\}$ is a prime ideal of $k[x]$. | |
| \item Describe all possible $\nu$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \noindent | |
| Let $A$ be a ring. An {\it idempotent} is an element $e \in A$ | |
| such that $e^2 = e$. The elements $1$ and $0$ are always idempotent. | |
| A {\it nontrivial idempotent} is an idempotent which is not | |
| equal to zero. Two idempotents $e, e' \in A$ are called {\it orthogonal} | |
| if $ee' = 0$. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-product} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring. Show that $A$ is a product of two nonzero rings if | |
| and only if $A$ has a nontrivial idempotent. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-lift-idempotents} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring and let $I \subset A$ be a locally nilpotent ideal. | |
| Show that the map $A \to A/I$ induces a bijection on idempotents. | |
| (Hint: It may be easier to prove this when $I$ is nilpotent. Do this first. | |
| Then use ``absolute Noetherian reduction'' to reduce to the nilpotent case.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Colimits} | |
| \label{section-colimits} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-directed-poset} | |
| A {\it directed set} is a nonempty set $I$ endowed with a preorder $\leq$ | |
| such that given any pair $i, j \in I$ there exists a $k \in I$ such that | |
| $i \leq k$ and $j \leq k$. A {\it system of rings} over $I$ is given by a | |
| ring $A_i$ for each $i \in I$ and a map of rings $\varphi_{ij} : A_i \to A_j$ | |
| whenever $i \leq j$ such that the composition $A_i \to A_j \to A_k$ is equal to | |
| $A_i \to A_k$ whenever $i \leq j \leq k$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \noindent | |
| One similarly defines systems of groups, modules over a fixed ring, | |
| vector spaces over a field, etc. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-directed-colimit} | |
| Let $I$ be a directed set and let | |
| $(A_i, \varphi_{ij})$ be a system of rings over $I$. | |
| Show that there exists a ring $A$ and maps $\varphi_i : A_i \to A$ | |
| such that $\varphi_j \circ \varphi_{ij} = \varphi_i$ for all $i \leq j$ | |
| with the following universal property: Given any ring $B$ | |
| and maps $\psi_i : A_i \to B$ such that | |
| $\psi_j \circ \varphi_{ij} = \psi_i$ for all $i \leq j$, then | |
| there exists a unique ring map $\psi : A \to B$ such that | |
| $\psi_i = \psi \circ \varphi_i$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-colimit} | |
| The ring $A$ constructed in Exercise \ref{exercise-directed-colimit} | |
| is called the {\it colimit} of the system. Notation $\colim A_i$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-prime-in-colimit} | |
| Let $(I, \geq)$ be a directed set and let | |
| $(A_i, \varphi_{ij})$ be a system of rings over $I$ with colimit | |
| $A$. Prove that there is a bijection | |
| $$ | |
| \Spec(A) = \{(\mathfrak p_i)_{i \in I} \mid | |
| \mathfrak p_i \subset A_i \text{ and } | |
| \mathfrak p_i = \varphi_{ij}^{-1}(\mathfrak p_j)\ \forall i \leq j\} | |
| \subset \prod\nolimits_{i \in I} \Spec(A_i) | |
| $$ | |
| The set on the right hand side of the equality is the limit of the sets | |
| $\Spec(A_i)$. Notation $\lim \Spec(A_i)$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-colimit-surjective} | |
| Let $(I, \geq)$ be a directed set and let | |
| $(A_i, \varphi_{ij})$ be a system of rings over $I$ with colimit | |
| $A$. Suppose that $\Spec(A_j) \to \Spec(A_i)$ is | |
| surjective for all $i \leq j$. Show that | |
| $\Spec(A) \to \Spec(A_i)$ is surjective for all $i$. | |
| (Hint: You can try to use Tychonoff, but there is also a basically trivial | |
| direct algebraic proof based on | |
| Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-in-image}.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-integral-colimit-finite} | |
| Let $A \subset B$ be an integral ring extension. Prove that | |
| $\Spec(B) \to \Spec(A)$ is surjective. | |
| Use the exercises above, the fact that this holds for a finite ring | |
| extension (proved in the lectures), and by proving that | |
| $B = \colim B_i$ is a directed colimit of finite extensions $A \subset B_i$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-colimit-tensor} | |
| Let $(I, \geq)$ be a directed set. | |
| Let $A$ be a ring and let $(N_i, \varphi_{i, i'})$ be a directed system of | |
| $A$-modules indexed by $I$. Suppose that $M$ is another $A$-module. Prove | |
| that | |
| $$ | |
| \colim_{i\in I} M \otimes_A N_i\cong | |
| M \otimes_A \Big( \colim_{i\in I} N_i\Big). | |
| $$ | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-finite-presentation} | |
| A module $M$ over $R$ is said to be of {\it finite presentation} over | |
| $R$ if it is isomorphic to the cokernel of a map of finite free modules | |
| $ R^{\oplus n} \to R^{\oplus m}$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-colimit-modules} | |
| Prove that any module over any ring is | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item the colimit of its finitely generated submodules, and | |
| \item in some way a colimit of finitely presented modules. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Additive and abelian categories} | |
| \label{section-additive} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-filtered-vector-spaces} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be the category of filtered vector | |
| spaces over $k$, see | |
| Homology, Definition \ref{homology-definition-filtered} | |
| for the definition of a filtered object of any category. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that this is an additive category (explain carefuly what the | |
| direct sum of two objects is). | |
| \item Let $f : (V, F) \to (W, F)$ be a morphism of $\mathcal{C}$. | |
| Show that $f$ has a kernel and cokernel (explain precisely | |
| what the kernel and cokernel of $f$ are). | |
| \item Give an example of a map of $\mathcal{C}$ such that | |
| the canonical map $\Coim(f) \to \Im(f)$ is not an isomorphism. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-torsion-free} | |
| Let $R$ be a Noetherian domain. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be the category of | |
| finitely generated torsion free $R$-modules. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that this is an additive category. | |
| \item Let $f : N \to M$ be a morphism of $\mathcal{C}$. | |
| Show that $f$ has a kernel and cokernel (make sure you define precisely | |
| what the kernel and cokernel of $f$ are). | |
| \item Give an example of a Noetherian domain $R$ and a map of | |
| $\mathcal{C}$ such that the canonical map $\Coim(f) \to \Im(f)$ | |
| is not an isomorphism. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-other} | |
| Give an example of a category which is additive and has kernels | |
| and cokernels but which is not as in | |
| Exercises \ref{exercise-filtered-vector-spaces} and | |
| \ref{exercise-torsion-free}. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Tensor product} | |
| \label{section-tensor-product} | |
| \noindent | |
| Tensor products are introduced in Algebra, Section | |
| \ref{algebra-section-tensor-product}. | |
| Let $R$ be a ring. Let $\text{Mod}_R$ be the category of $R$-modules. | |
| We will say that a functor $F : \text{Mod}_R \to \text{Mod}_R$ | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item is additive if | |
| $F : \Hom_R(M, N) \to \Hom_R(F(M), F(N))$ | |
| is a homomorphism of abelian groups | |
| for any $R$-modules $M, N$, see | |
| Homology, Definition \ref{homology-definition-preadditive}. | |
| \item $R$-linear if $F : \Hom_R(M, N) \to \Hom_R(F(M), F(N))$ is $R$-linear | |
| for any $R$-modules $M, N$, | |
| \item right exact if for any short exact sequence | |
| $0 \to M_1 \to M_2 \to M_3 \to 0$ the sequence | |
| $F(M_1) \to F(M_2) \to F(M_3) \to 0$ is exact, | |
| \item left exact if for any short exact sequence | |
| $0 \to M_1 \to M_2 \to M_3 \to 0$ the sequence | |
| $0 \to F(M_1) \to F(M_2) \to F(M_3)$ is exact, | |
| \item commutes with direct sums, if given a set | |
| $I$ and $R$-modules $M_i$ the maps | |
| $F(M_i) \to F(\bigoplus M_i)$ induce an isomorphism | |
| $\bigoplus F(M_i) = F(\bigoplus M_i)$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-characterize-tensor-functor} | |
| Let $R$ be a ring. With notation as above. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Give an example of a ring $R$ and an additive functor | |
| $F : \text{Mod}_R \to \text{Mod}_R$ which is not $R$-linear. | |
| \item Let $N$ be an $R$-module. Show that the functor | |
| $F(M) = M \otimes_R N$ is $R$-linear, | |
| right exact, and commutes with direct sums, | |
| \item Conversely, show that any functor $F : \text{Mod}_R \to \text{Mod}_R$ | |
| which is $R$-linear, | |
| right exact, and commutes with direct sums is of the | |
| form $F(M) = M \otimes_R N$ for some $R$-module $N$. | |
| \item Show that if in (3) we drop the assumption | |
| that $F$ commutes with direct sums, then the conclusion no | |
| longer holds. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Flat ring maps} | |
| \label{section-flat} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-localization-flat} | |
| Let $S$ be a multiplicative subset of the ring $A$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item For an $A$-module $M$ show that $S^{-1}M = S^{-1}A \otimes_A M$. | |
| \item Show that $S^{-1}A$ is flat over $A$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-examples-not-flat} | |
| Find an injection $M_1 \to M_2$ of $A$-modules such that | |
| $M_1\otimes N \to M_2 \otimes N$ is not injective in the following | |
| cases: | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $A = k[x, y]$ and $N = (x, y) \subset A$. (Here and below $k$ is a field.) | |
| \item $A = k[x, y]$ and $N = A/(x, y)$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-flat-not-projective} | |
| Give an example of a ring $A$ and a finite $A$-module $M$ | |
| which is a flat but not a projective $A$-module. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-flat-not-projective} | |
| If $M$ is of finite presentation and flat over $A$, | |
| then $M$ is projective over $A$. Thus your example will have to | |
| involve a ring $A$ which is not Noetherian. I know of an example | |
| where $A$ is the ring of ${\mathcal C}^\infty$-functions on ${\mathbf R}$. | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-flat-not-free-dvr} | |
| Find a flat but not free module over ${\mathbf Z}_{(2)}$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-flat-deformations} | |
| Flat deformations. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Suppose that $k$ is a field and $k[\epsilon]$ is the ring of | |
| dual numbers $k[\epsilon] = k[x]/(x^2)$ and $\epsilon = \bar x$. Show that for | |
| any $k$-algebra $A$ there is a flat $k[\epsilon]$-algebra $B$ such that | |
| $A$ is isomorphic to $B/\epsilon B$. | |
| \item Suppose that $k = {\mathbf F}_p = {\mathbf Z}/p{\mathbf Z}$ and | |
| $$ | |
| A = k[x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4, x_5, x_6]/ | |
| (x_1^p, x_2^p, x_3^p, x_4^p, x_5^p, x_6^p). | |
| $$ | |
| Show that there exists a flat ${\mathbf Z}/p^2{\mathbf Z}$-algebra $B$ such | |
| that $B/pB$ is isomorphic to $A$. (So here $p$ plays the role of $\epsilon$.) | |
| \item Now let $p = 2$ and consider the same question for | |
| $k = {\mathbf F}_2 = {\mathbf Z}/2{\mathbf Z}$ and | |
| $$ | |
| A = k[x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4, x_5, x_6]/ | |
| (x_1^2, x_2^2, x_3^2, x_4^2, x_5^2, x_6^2, x_1x_2 + x_3x_4 + x_5x_6). | |
| $$ | |
| However, in this case show that there does {\it not} exist a flat | |
| ${\mathbf Z}/4{\mathbf Z}$-algebra $B$ such that $B/2B$ is isomorphic to | |
| $A$. (Find the trick! The same example works in arbitrary characteristic | |
| $p > 0$, except that the computation is more difficult.) | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-flat-given-residue-field-extension} | |
| Let $(A, {\mathfrak m}, k)$ be a local ring and let $k'/k$ be | |
| a finite field extension. Show there exists a flat, local map of | |
| local rings $A \to B$ such that ${\mathfrak m}_B = {\mathfrak m} B$ and | |
| $B/{\mathfrak m} B$ is | |
| isomorphic to $k'$ as $k$-algebra. (Hint: first do the case where | |
| $k \subset k'$ is generated by a single element.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-flat-given-residue-field-extension-general} | |
| The same result holds for arbitrary field extensions $K/k$. | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \section{The Spectrum of a ring} | |
| \label{section-spectrum-ring} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-spec-Z} | |
| Compute $\Spec(\mathbf{Z})$ as a set and describe its topology. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-basis-opens-standard} | |
| Let $A$ be any ring. For $f\in A$ we define | |
| $D(f):= \{\mathfrak p \subset A \mid f \not \in \mathfrak p\}$. | |
| Prove that the open subsets $D(f)$ form a basis of the topology of | |
| $\Spec(A)$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-radical-ideals-closed} | |
| Prove that the map $I\mapsto V(I)$ | |
| defines a natural bijection | |
| $$ | |
| \{I\subset A\text{ with }I = \sqrt{I}\} | |
| \longrightarrow | |
| \{T\subset \Spec(A)\text{ closed}\} | |
| $$ | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-quasi-compact} | |
| A topological space $X$ is called {\it quasi-compact} | |
| if for any open covering $X = \bigcup_{i\in I} U_i$ there is a finite | |
| subset $\{i_1, \ldots, i_n\}\subset I$ such that $X = U_{i_1}\cup\ldots | |
| U_{i_n}$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-spec-quasi-compact} | |
| Prove that $\Spec(A)$ is quasi-compact for any ring $A$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-Hausdorff} | |
| A topological space $X$ is said to verify the separation axiom $T_0$ | |
| if for any pair of points $x, y\in X$, $x\not = y$ there is an open | |
| subset of $X$ containing one but not the other. | |
| We say that $X$ is {\it Hausdorff} if for any pair $x, y\in X$, $x\not = y$ | |
| there are disjoint open subsets $U, V$ such that $x\in U$ | |
| and $y\in V$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-not-hausdorff} | |
| Show that $\Spec(A)$ is {\bf not} Hausdorff in general. | |
| Prove that $\Spec(A)$ is $T_0$. Give an example of a topological | |
| space $X$ that is not $T_0$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-not-hausdorff} | |
| Usually the word compact is reserved for quasi-compact and | |
| Hausdorff spaces. | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-irreducible} | |
| A topological space $X$ is called {\it irreducible} if $X$ is not empty | |
| and if $X = Z_1\cup Z_2$ with $Z_1, Z_2\subset X$ closed, then either | |
| $Z_1 = X$ or $Z_2 = X$. A subset $T\subset X$ of a topological space | |
| is called {\it irreducible} if it is an irreducible | |
| topological space with the topology induced from $X$. | |
| This definition implies $T$ is irreducible if and only | |
| if the closure $\bar T$ of $T$ in $X$ is irreducible. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-irreducible-spec} | |
| Prove that $\Spec(A)$ is irreducible if and only if | |
| $Nil(A)$ is a prime ideal and that in this case it is the unique | |
| minimal prime ideal of $A$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-irreducible-prime} | |
| Prove that a closed subset $T\subset \Spec(A)$ | |
| is irreducible if and only if it is of the form $T = V({\mathfrak p})$ for | |
| some prime ideal ${\mathfrak p}\subset A$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-generic-point} | |
| A point $x$ of an irreducible topological space $X$ is called | |
| a {\it generic point} of $X$ if $X$ is equal to the closure of | |
| the subset $\{x\}$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-irreducible-T0-at-most-one-generic} | |
| Show that in a $T_0$ space $X$ every irreducible closed | |
| subset has at most one generic point. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-spec-sober} | |
| Prove that in $\Spec(A)$ every | |
| irreducible closed subset {\it does} have a generic point. | |
| In fact show that the map | |
| ${\mathfrak p} \mapsto \overline{\{{\mathfrak p}\}}$ is | |
| a bijection of $\Spec(A)$ with the set of irreducible closed | |
| subsets of $X$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-irreducible-subset-not-generic} | |
| Give an example to show that an irreducible | |
| subset of $\Spec(\mathbf{Z})$ does not necessarily have a generic point. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-Noetherian-space} | |
| A topological space $X$ is called {\it Noetherian} if any | |
| decreasing sequence $Z_1\supset Z_2 \supset Z_3\supset \ldots$ | |
| of closed subsets of $X$ stabilizes. | |
| (It is called {\it Artinian} if any increasing sequence of closed | |
| subsets stabilizes.) | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-Noetherian-spec} | |
| Show that if the ring $A$ is Noetherian then | |
| the topological space $\Spec(A)$ is Noetherian. Give an | |
| example to show that the converse is false. (The same for | |
| Artinian if you like.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-irreducible-component} | |
| A maximal irreducible subset $T\subset X$ is called an | |
| {\it irreducible component} of the space $X$. Such an irreducible | |
| component of $X$ is automatically a closed subset of $X$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-irreducible-in-irreducible} | |
| Prove that any irreducible subset | |
| of $X$ is contained in an irreducible component of $X$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-Noetherian-finite-nr-irreducible} | |
| Prove that a Noetherian topological space $X$ | |
| has only finitely many irreducible components, say $X_1, \ldots, X_n$, | |
| and that $X = X_1\cup X_2\cup\ldots\cup X_n$. (Note that | |
| any $X$ is always the union of its irreducible components, but that | |
| if $X = {\mathbf R}$ with its usual topology for instance then the irreducible | |
| components of $X$ are the one point subsets. This is not | |
| terribly interesting.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-irreducible-components-minimal-primes} | |
| Show that irreducible components of $\Spec(A)$ | |
| correspond to minimal primes of $A$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-closed} | |
| A point $x\in X$ is called {\it closed} if $\overline{\{x\}} = \{ x\}$. | |
| Let $x, y$ be points of $X$. We say that $x$ is a {\it specialization} | |
| of $y$, or that $y$ is a {\it generalization} of $x$ if | |
| $x\in \overline{\{y\}}$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-closed-maximal} | |
| Show that closed points of $\Spec(A)$ | |
| correspond to maximal ideals of $A$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-generalization} | |
| Show that ${\mathfrak p}$ is a generalization of ${\mathfrak q}$ | |
| in $\Spec(A)$ if and only if ${\mathfrak p}\subset {\mathfrak q}$. | |
| Characterize closed points, | |
| maximal ideals, generic points and minimal prime ideals in terms of | |
| generalization and specialization. (Here we use the terminology that a point | |
| of a possibly reducible topological space $X$ is called a generic point | |
| if it is a generic points of one of the irreducible components of $X$.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-disjoint-closed-spec} | |
| Let $I$ and $J$ be ideals of $A$. | |
| What is the condition for $V(I)$ and $V(J)$ to be disjoint? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-connected-component} | |
| A topological space $X$ is called {\it connected} if it is nonempty and not the | |
| union of two nonempty disjoint open subsets. A {\it connected component} | |
| of $X$ is a maximal connected subset. Any point of $X$ is contained | |
| in a connected component of $X$ and any connected component of $X$ is | |
| closed in $X$. (But in general a connected component need not be open in $X$.) | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-disconnected-spec} | |
| Let $A$ be a nonzero ring. | |
| Show that $\Spec(A)$ is disconnected | |
| iff $A\cong B \times C$ for certain nonzero rings $B, C$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-connected-component-stable-generalization} | |
| Let $T$ be a connected component | |
| of $\Spec(A)$. Prove that $T$ is stable under generalization. | |
| Prove that $T$ is an open subset of $\Spec(A)$ if $A$ is Noetherian. | |
| (Remark: This is wrong when $A$ is an infinite product of copies of | |
| ${\mathbf F}_2$ for example. The spectrum of this ring consists of infinitely | |
| many closed points.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-primes-kx} | |
| Compute $\Spec(k[x])$, i.e., describe | |
| the prime ideals in this ring, describe the possible specializations, and | |
| describe the topology. (Work this out when $k$ is algebraically closed but | |
| also when $k$ is not.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-primes-kxy} | |
| Compute $\Spec(k[x, y])$, where $k$ is algebraically | |
| closed. | |
| [Hint: use the morphism | |
| $\varphi : \Spec(k[x, y]) \to \Spec(k[x])$; if | |
| $\varphi({\mathfrak p}) = (0)$ then localize with respect to | |
| $S = \{f\in k[x] \mid f \not = 0\}$ and use result of lecture | |
| on localization and $\Spec$.] | |
| (Why do you think algebraic geometers call this affine 2-space?) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-primes-Zy} | |
| Compute $\Spec(\mathbf{Z}[y])$. | |
| [Hint: as above.] (Affine 1-space over $\mathbf{Z}$.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Localization} | |
| \label{section-localization} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-submodule-localization} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring. Let $S \subset A$ be a multiplicative subset. | |
| Let $M$ be an $A$-module. Let $N \subset S^{-1}M$ be an $S^{-1}A$-submodule. | |
| Show that there exists an $A$-submodule $N' \subset M$ such that | |
| $N = S^{-1}N'$. (This useful result applies in particular to ideals | |
| of $S^{-1}A$.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-localize-zero} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring. Let $M$ be an $A$-module. Let $m \in M$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that $I = \{a \in A \mid am = 0\}$ is an ideal of $A$. | |
| \item For a prime $\mathfrak p$ of $A$ show that the image of $m$ | |
| in $M_\mathfrak p$ is zero if and only if $I \not \subset \mathfrak p$. | |
| \item Show that $m$ is zero if and only if the image of $m$ is zero | |
| in $M_\mathfrak p$ for all primes $\mathfrak p$ of $A$. | |
| \item Show that $m$ is zero if and only if the image of $m$ is zero | |
| in $M_\mathfrak m$ for all maximal ideals $\mathfrak m$ of $A$. | |
| \item Show that $M = 0$ if and only if $M_{\mathfrak m}$ is zero | |
| for all maximal ideals $\mathfrak m$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-localization-is-field} | |
| Find a pair $(A, f)$ where $A$ is a domain with three or more pairwise | |
| distinct primes and $f \in A$ is an element such that the principal | |
| localization $A_f = \{1, f, f^2, \ldots \}^{-1}A$ is a field. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-localize-finite-module-zero} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring. Let $M$ be a finite $A$-module. Let $S \subset A$ | |
| be a multiplicative set. Assume that $S^{-1}M = 0$. Show that there | |
| exists an $f \in S$ such that the principal localization | |
| $M_f = \{1, f, f^2, \ldots \}^{-1}M$ is zero. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-localization-is-quotient} | |
| Give an example of a triple $(A, I, S)$ where $A$ is a ring, | |
| $0 \not = I \not = A$ is a proper nonzero ideal, and $S \subset A$ | |
| is a multiplicative subset | |
| such that $A/I \cong S^{-1}A$ as $A$-algebras. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Nakayama's Lemma} | |
| \label{section-nakayama} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-nakayama} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring. | |
| Let $I$ be an ideal of $A$. | |
| Let $M$ be an $A$-module. | |
| Let $x_1, \ldots, x_n \in M$. | |
| Assume that | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $M/IM$ is generated by $x_1, \ldots, x_n$, | |
| \item $M$ is a finite $A$-module, | |
| \item $I$ is contained in every maximal ideal of $A$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| Show that $x_1, \ldots, x_n$ generate $M$. (Suggested solution: | |
| Reduce to a localization at a maximal ideal of $A$ using | |
| Exercise \ref{exercise-localize-zero} and exactness of localization. | |
| Then reduce to the statement of Nakayama's lemma in the lectures | |
| by looking at the quotient of $M$ by the submodule generated by | |
| $x_1, \ldots, x_n$.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Length} | |
| \label{section-length} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-length} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring. Let $M$ be an $A$-module. The | |
| {\it length} of $M$ as an $R$-module is | |
| $$ | |
| \text{length}_A(M) | |
| = | |
| \sup | |
| \{ | |
| n | |
| \mid | |
| \exists\ 0 = M_0 \subset M_1 \subset \ldots \subset M_n = M, | |
| \text{ }M_i \not = M_{i + 1} | |
| \}. | |
| $$ | |
| In other words, the supremum of the lengths of chains of submodules. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-length-is-one} | |
| Show that a module $M$ over a ring $A$ has length $1$ if and only if | |
| it is isomorphic to $A/\mathfrak m$ for some maximal ideal $\mathfrak m$ | |
| in $A$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-length-easy} | |
| Compute the length of the following modules over the following rings. | |
| Briefly(!) explain your answer. (Please feel free to use additivity of | |
| the length function in short exact sequences, see | |
| Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-length-additive}). | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item The length of $\mathbf{Z}/120\mathbf{Z}$ over $\mathbf{Z}$. | |
| \item The length of $\mathbf{C}[x]/(x^{100} + x + 1)$ over $\mathbf{C}[x]$. | |
| \item The length of $\mathbf{R}[x]/(x^4 + 2x^2 + 1)$ over $\mathbf{R}[x]$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-compute-length} | |
| Let $A = k[x, y]_{(x, y)}$ be the local ring of the affine plane at | |
| the origin. Make any assumption you like about the field $k$. Suppose | |
| that $f = x^3 + x^2y^2 + y^{100}$ and $g = y^3 - x^{999}$. What is the length | |
| of $A/(f, g)$ as an $A$-module? (Possible way to proceed: think about the | |
| ideal that $f$ and $g$ generate in quotients of the form $A/{\mathfrak m}_A^n= | |
| k[x, y]/(x, y)^n$ for varying $n$. Try to find $n$ such that | |
| $A/(f, g)+{\mathfrak m}_A^n \cong A/(f, g)+{\mathfrak m}_A^{n + 1}$ | |
| and use NAK.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Associated primes} | |
| \label{section-ass} | |
| \noindent | |
| Associated primes are discussed in | |
| Algebra, Section \ref{algebra-section-ass} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-compute-ass} | |
| Compute the set of associated primes for each of the following modules. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $R = k[x, y]$ and $M = R/(xy(x + y))$, | |
| \item $R = \mathbf{Z}[x]$ and $M = R/(300x + 75)$, and | |
| \item $R = k[x, y, z]$ and $M = R/(x^3, x^2y, xz)$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| Here as usual $k$ is a field. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-prime-power-not-primary} | |
| Give an example of a Noetherian ring $R$ and a prime ideal $\mathfrak p$ | |
| such that $\mathfrak p$ is not the only associated prime of $R/\mathfrak p^2$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-product-primes-not-only-associated} | |
| Let $R$ be a Noetherian ring with incomparable prime ideals | |
| $\mathfrak p$, $\mathfrak q$, i.e., $\mathfrak p \not \subset \mathfrak q$ | |
| and $\mathfrak q \not \subset \mathfrak p$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that for $N = R/(\mathfrak p \cap \mathfrak q)$ | |
| we have $\text{Ass}(N) = \{\mathfrak p, \mathfrak q\}$. | |
| \item Show by an example that the module | |
| $M = R/\mathfrak p \mathfrak q$ can | |
| have an associated prime not equal to $\mathfrak p$ or $\mathfrak q$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Ext groups} | |
| \label{section-ext} | |
| \noindent | |
| Ext groups are defined in Algebra, Section \ref{algebra-section-ext}. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-compute-ext-abelian-groups} | |
| Compute all the Ext groups $\Ext^i(M, N)$ of the given modules | |
| in the category of $\mathbf{Z}$-modules | |
| (also known as the category of abelian groups). | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $M = \mathbf{Z}$ and $N = \mathbf{Z}$, | |
| \item $M = \mathbf{Z}/4\mathbf{Z}$ and $N = \mathbf{Z}/8\mathbf{Z}$, | |
| \item $M = \mathbf{Q}$ and $N = \mathbf{Z}/2\mathbf{Z}$, and | |
| \item $M = \mathbf{Z}/2\mathbf{Z}$ and $N = \mathbf{Q}/\mathbf{Z}$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-compute-in-regular} | |
| Let $R = k[x, y]$ where $k$ is a field. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show by hand that the Koszul complex | |
| $$ | |
| 0 \to R | |
| \xrightarrow{ | |
| \left( | |
| \begin{matrix} | |
| y \\ | |
| -x | |
| \end{matrix} | |
| \right) | |
| } | |
| R^{\oplus 2} \xrightarrow{(x, y)} R \xrightarrow{f \mapsto f(0, 0)} k \to 0 | |
| $$ | |
| is exact. | |
| \item Compute $\Ext^i_R(k, k)$ where $k = R/(x, y)$ as an $R$-module. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-infinitely-many-nonzero-ext} | |
| Give an example of a Noetherian ring $R$ and finite modules $M$, $N$ | |
| such that $\Ext^i_R(M, N)$ is nonzero for all $i \geq 0$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-infinite-ext} | |
| Give an example of a ring $R$ and ideal $I$ such that | |
| $\Ext^1_R(R/I, R/I)$ is not a finite $R$-module. | |
| (We know this cannot happen if $R$ is Noetherian by | |
| Algebra, Lemma \ref{algebra-lemma-ext-noetherian}.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Depth} | |
| \label{section-depth} | |
| \noindent | |
| Depth is defined in Algebra, Section \ref{algebra-section-depth} | |
| and further studied in | |
| Dualizing Complexes, Section \ref{dualizing-section-depth}. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-compute-depth} | |
| Let $R$ be a ring, $I \subset R$ an ideal, and $M$ an $R$-module. | |
| Compute $\text{depth}_I(M)$ in the following cases. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $R = \mathbf{Z}$, $I = (30)$, $M = \mathbf{Z}$, | |
| \item $R = \mathbf{Z}$, $I = (30)$, $M = \mathbf{Z}/(300)$, | |
| \item $R = \mathbf{Z}$, $I = (30)$, $M = \mathbf{Z}/(7)$, | |
| \item $R = k[x, y, z]/(x^2 + y^2 + z^2)$, $I = (x, y, z)$, $M = R$, | |
| \item $R = k[x, y, z, w]/(xz, xw, yz, yw)$, $I = (x, y, z, w)$, | |
| $M = R$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| Here $k$ is a field. In the last two cases feel free to localize | |
| at the maximal ideal $I$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-depth-not-inherited-localization} | |
| Give an example of a Noetherian local ring $(R, \mathfrak m, \kappa)$ | |
| of depth $\geq 1$ and a prime ideal $\mathfrak p$ such that | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $\text{depth}_\mathfrak m(R) \geq 1$, | |
| \item $\text{depth}_\mathfrak p(R_\mathfrak p) = 0$, and | |
| \item $\dim(R_\mathfrak p) \geq 1$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| If we don't ask for (3) then the exercise is too easy. Why? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-depth-torsion-free} | |
| Let $(R, \mathfrak m)$ be a local Noetherian domain. | |
| Let $M$ be a finite $R$-module. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item If $M$ is torsion free, show that $M$ has depth at least $1$ over $R$. | |
| \item Give an example with depth equal to $1$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-depth-examples} | |
| For every $m \geq n \geq 0$ give an example of a Noetherian local | |
| ring $R$ with $\dim(R) = m$ and $\text{depth}(R) = n$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-make-depth-1} | |
| Let $(R, \mathfrak m)$ be a Noetherian local ring. | |
| Let $M$ be a finite $R$-module. | |
| Show that there exists a canonical short exact sequence | |
| $$ | |
| 0 \to K \to M \to Q \to 0 | |
| $$ | |
| such that the following are true | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $\text{depth}(Q) \geq 1$, | |
| \item $K$ is zero or $\text{Supp}(K) = \{\mathfrak m\}$, and | |
| \item $\text{length}_R(K) < \infty$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| Hint: using the Noetherian property show that | |
| there exists a maximal submodule $K$ as in (2) | |
| and then show that $Q = M/K$ satisfies (1) and $K$ satisfies (3). | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-make-depth-2} | |
| Let $(R, \mathfrak m)$ be a Noetherian local ring. | |
| Let $M$ be a finite $R$-module of depth $\geq 2$. | |
| Let $N \subset M$ be a nonzero submodule. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that $\text{depth}(N) \geq 1$. | |
| \item Show that $\text{depth}(N) = 1$ if and only if the | |
| quotient module $M/N$ has $\text{depth}(M/N) = 0$. | |
| \item Show there exists a submodule $N' \subset M$ with | |
| $N \subset N'$ of finite colength, i.e., | |
| $\text{length}_R(N'/N) < \infty$, such that $N'$ has | |
| depth $\geq 2$. Hint: Apply Exercise \ref{exercise-make-depth-1} to $M/N$ | |
| and choose $N'$ to be the inverse image of $K$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-Hartshorne-reduced} | |
| Let $(R, \mathfrak m)$ be a Noetherian local ring. | |
| Assume that $R$ is reduced, i.e., $R$ has no nonzero | |
| nilpotent elements. Assume moreover that $R$ has two | |
| distinct minimal primes $\mathfrak p$ and $\mathfrak q$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that the sequence of $R$-modules | |
| $$ | |
| 0 \to R \to R/\mathfrak p \oplus R/\mathfrak q \to | |
| R/\mathfrak p + \mathfrak q \to 0 | |
| $$ | |
| is exact (check at all the spots). The maps are | |
| $x \mapsto (x \bmod \mathfrak p, x \bmod \mathfrak q)$ | |
| and $(y \bmod \mathfrak p, z \bmod \mathfrak q) \mapsto | |
| (y - z \bmod \mathfrak p + \mathfrak q)$. | |
| \item Show that if $\text{depth}(R) \geq 2$, then | |
| $\dim(R/\mathfrak p + \mathfrak q) \geq 1$. | |
| \item Show that if $\text{depth}(R) \geq 2$, then | |
| $U = \Spec(R) \setminus \{\mathfrak m\}$ is a connected | |
| topological space. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| This proves a very special case of Hartshorne's connectedness | |
| theorem which says that the punctured spectrum $U$ of a local | |
| Noetherian ring of $\text{depth} \geq 2$ is connected. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-depth-2} | |
| Let $(R, \mathfrak m)$ be a Noetherian local ring. | |
| Let $x, y \in \mathfrak m$ be a regular sequence of length $2$. | |
| For any $n \geq 2$ show that there do not exist $a, b \in R$ with | |
| $$ | |
| x^{n - 1}y^{n - 1} = a x^n + b y^n | |
| $$ | |
| Suggestion: First try for $n = 2$ to see how to argue. | |
| Remark: There is a vast generalization of this result | |
| called the monomial conjecture. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Cohen-Macaulay modules and rings} | |
| \label{section-CM} | |
| \noindent | |
| Cohen-Macaulay modules are studied in | |
| Algebra, Section \ref{algebra-section-CM} | |
| and Cohen-Macaulay rings are studied in | |
| Algebra, Section \ref{algebra-section-CM-ring}. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-examples-CM} | |
| In the following cases, please answer yes or no. | |
| No explanation or proof necessary. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Let $p$ be a prime number. | |
| Is the local ring $\mathbf{Z}_{(p)}$ a Cohen-Macaulay local ring? | |
| \item Let $p$ be a prime number. | |
| Is the local ring $\mathbf{Z}_{(p)}$ a regular local ring? | |
| \item Let $k$ be a field. | |
| Is the local ring $k[x]_{(x)}$ a Cohen-Macaulay local ring? | |
| \item Let $k$ be a field. | |
| Is the local ring $k[x]_{(x)}$ a regular local ring? | |
| \item Let $k$ be a field. | |
| Is the local ring $(k[x, y]/(y^2 - x^3))_{(x, y)} = | |
| k[x, y]_{(x, y)}/(y^2 - x^3)$ a Cohen-Macaulay local ring? | |
| \item Let $k$ be a field. | |
| Is the local ring $(k[x, y]/(y^2, xy))_{(x, y)} = | |
| k[x, y]_{(x, y)}/(y^2, xy)$ a Cohen-Macaulay local ring? | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Singularities} | |
| \label{section-singularities} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-singularities} | |
| Let $k$ be any field. Suppose that $A = k[[x, y]]/(f)$ and | |
| $B = k[[u, v]]/(g)$, where $f = xy$ and $g = uv + \delta$ with | |
| $\delta \in (u, v)^3$. Show that $A$ and $B$ are isomorphic rings. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-singularities} | |
| A singularity on a curve over a field $k$ is called an | |
| ordinary double point if the complete local ring of the curve at the | |
| point is of the form $k'[[x, y]]/(f)$, where (a) $k'$ is a finite separable | |
| extension of $k$, (b) the initial term of $f$ has degree two, i.e., it | |
| looks like $q = ax^2 + bxy + cy^2$ for some $a, b, c\in k'$ not all zero, and | |
| (c) $q$ is a nondegenerate quadratic form over $k'$ (in char 2 this means that | |
| $b$ is not zero). In general there is one isomorphism class of such rings for | |
| each isomorphism class of pairs $(k', q)$. | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-periodic-resolution} | |
| Let $R$ be a ring. Let $n \geq 1$. Let $A$, $B$ be $n \times n$ matrices with | |
| coefficients in $R$ such that $AB = f 1_{n \times n}$ | |
| for some nonzerodivisor $f$ in $R$. Set $S = R/(f)$. Show that | |
| $$ | |
| \ldots \to | |
| S^{\oplus n} \xrightarrow{B} | |
| S^{\oplus n} \xrightarrow{A} | |
| S^{\oplus n} \xrightarrow{B} | |
| S^{\oplus n} \to \ldots | |
| $$ | |
| is exact. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Constructible sets} | |
| \label{section-constructible} | |
| \noindent | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field, for example the field $\mathbf{C}$ | |
| of complex numbers. Let $n \geq 0$. A polynomial $f \in k[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ | |
| gives a function $f : k^n \to k$ by evaluation. A subset $Z \subset k^n$ | |
| is called an {\it algebraic set} if it is the common vanishing set of a | |
| collection of polynomials. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-finite-nr-equations} | |
| Prove that an algebraic set can always be written as the zero locus | |
| of finitely many polynomials. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \noindent | |
| With notation as above a subset $E \subset k^n$ is called | |
| {\it constructible} if it is a finite union of sets of the form | |
| $Z \cap \{f \not = 0\}$ where $f$ is a polynomial. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-constructible-classical} | |
| Show the following | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item the complement of a constructible set is a constructible set, | |
| \item a finite union of constructible sets is a constructible set, | |
| \item a finite intersection of constructible sets is a constructible set, and | |
| \item any constructible set $E$ can be written as a finite disjoint union | |
| $E = \coprod E_i$ with each $E_i$ of the form $Z \cap \{f \not = 0\}$ | |
| where $Z$ is an algebraic set and $f$ is a polynomial. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-division-with-remainder} | |
| Let $R$ be a ring. Let | |
| $f = a_d x^d + a_{d - 1} x^{d - 1} + \ldots + a_0 \in R[x]$. | |
| (As usual this notation means $a_0, \ldots, a_d \in R$.) Let $g \in R[x]$. | |
| Prove that we can find $N \geq 0$ and $r, q \in R[x]$ such that | |
| $$ | |
| a_d^N g = q f + r | |
| $$ | |
| with $\deg(r) < d$, i.e., for some $c_i \in R$ we have | |
| $r = c_0 + c_1 x + \ldots + c_{d - 1}x^{d - 1}$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Hilbert Nullstellensatz} | |
| \label{section-Hilbert-Nullstellensatz} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-uncountable} | |
| {\it A silly argument using the complex numbers!} | |
| Let ${\mathbf C}$ be the complex number field. Let $V$ be a vector | |
| space over ${\mathbf C}$. The spectrum of a linear operator | |
| $T : V \to V$ is the set of complex numbers $\lambda \in {\mathbf C}$ | |
| such that the operator $T - \lambda \text{id}_V$ is not invertible. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that $\mathbf{C}(X)$ | |
| has uncountable dimension over ${\mathbf C}$. | |
| \item Show that any linear operator on $V$ has a | |
| nonempty spectrum if the dimension of $V$ is finite or | |
| countable. | |
| \item Show that if a finitely generated ${\mathbf C}$-algebra | |
| $R$ is a field, then the map ${\mathbf C}\to R$ is an isomorphism. | |
| \item Show that any maximal ideal ${\mathfrak m}$ of | |
| ${\mathbf C}[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ is of the form | |
| $(x_1-\alpha_1, \ldots, x_n-\alpha_n)$ for some $\alpha_i \in {\mathbf C}$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-HNSS} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Then for every integer $n\in {\mathbf N}$ and | |
| every maximal ideal ${\mathfrak m} \subset k[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ | |
| the quotient $k[x_1, \ldots, x_n]/{\mathfrak m}$ is a finite field | |
| extension of $k$. This will be shown later in the course. Of course | |
| (please check this) it implies a similar statement for maximal ideals | |
| of finitely generated $k$-algebras. The exercise above proves | |
| it in the case $k = {\mathbf C}$. | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-Hilbert-Nullstellensatz} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Please use Remark \ref{remark-HNSS}. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Let $R$ be a $k$-algebra. Suppose that $\dim_k R < \infty$ | |
| and that $R$ is a domain. Show that $R$ is a field. | |
| \item Suppose that $R$ is a finitely generated $k$-algebra, and | |
| $f\in R$ not nilpotent. Show that there exists a maximal ideal | |
| ${\mathfrak m} \subset R$ with $f\not\in {\mathfrak m}$. | |
| \item Show by an example that this statement fails when $R$ | |
| is not of finite type over a field. | |
| \item Show that any radical ideal $I \subset {\mathbf C}[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ | |
| is the intersection of the maximal ideals containing it. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-Hilbert-Nullstellensatz} | |
| This is the Hilbert Nullstellensatz. Namely it says | |
| that the closed subsets of $\Spec(k[x_1, \ldots, x_n])$ | |
| (which correspond to radical ideals by a previous exercise) | |
| are determined by the closed points contained in them. | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-product-matrices-ring} | |
| Let $A = | |
| {\mathbf C}[x_{11}, x_{12}, x_{21}, x_{22}, y_{11}, y_{12}, y_{21}, y_{22}]$. | |
| Let $I$ be the ideal of $A$ generated by the entries of the | |
| matrix $XY$, with | |
| $$ | |
| X = \left( | |
| \begin{matrix} | |
| x_{11} & x_{12}\\ | |
| x_{21} & x_{22} | |
| \end{matrix} | |
| \right) | |
| \quad\text{and}\quad | |
| Y = \left( | |
| \begin{matrix} | |
| y_{11} & y_{12}\\ | |
| y_{21} & y_{22} | |
| \end{matrix} | |
| \right). | |
| $$ | |
| Find the irreducible components of the closed subset $V(I)$ of | |
| $\Spec(A)$. | |
| (I mean describe them and give equations for each of them. You do not have | |
| to prove that the equations you write down define prime ideals.) Hints: | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item You may use the Hilbert Nullstellensatz, and it suffices to find | |
| irreducible locally closed subsets which cover the set of closed points of | |
| $V(I)$. | |
| \item There are two easy components. | |
| \item An image of an irreducible set under a continuous map is | |
| irreducible. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Dimension} | |
| \label{section-dimension} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-dimension-bigger-one-finite-nr-primes} | |
| Construct a ring $A$ with finitely many prime ideals having dimension $> 1$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-hypersurface-in-A2-dimension-one} | |
| Let $f \in \mathbf{C}[x, y]$ be a nonconstant polynomial. | |
| Show that $\mathbf{C}[x, y]/(f)$ has dimension $1$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-dimension-polynomial-ring} | |
| Let $(R, \mathfrak m)$ be a Noetherian local ring. | |
| Let $n \geq 1$. Let $\mathfrak m' = (\mathfrak m, x_1, \ldots, x_n)$ | |
| in the polynomial ring $R[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$. | |
| Show that | |
| $$ | |
| \dim(R[x_1, \ldots, x_n]_{\mathfrak m'}) = \dim(R) + n. | |
| $$ | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Catenary rings} | |
| \label{section-catenary} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-catenary} | |
| A Noetherian ring $A$ is said to be {\it catenary} | |
| if for any triple of prime ideals | |
| ${\mathfrak p}_1 \subset {\mathfrak p}_2 \subset {\mathfrak p}_3$ | |
| we have | |
| $$ | |
| ht({\mathfrak p}_3 / {\mathfrak p}_1) = ht({\mathfrak p}_3/{\mathfrak p}_2) + | |
| ht({\mathfrak p}_2/{\mathfrak p}_1). | |
| $$ | |
| Here $ht(\mathfrak p/\mathfrak q)$ means the height of | |
| $\mathfrak p/\mathfrak q$ in the ring $A/\mathfrak q$. | |
| In a formula | |
| $$ | |
| ht(\mathfrak p/\mathfrak q) = | |
| \dim(A_\mathfrak p/\mathfrak qA_\mathfrak p) = | |
| \dim((A/\mathfrak q)_\mathfrak p) = | |
| \dim((A/\mathfrak q)_{\mathfrak p/\mathfrak q}) | |
| $$ | |
| A topological space $X$ is {\it catenary}, if given $T \subset T' \subset X$ | |
| with $T$ and $T'$ closed and irreducible, then there exists a maximal chain | |
| of irreducible closed subsets | |
| $$ | |
| T = T_0 \subset T_1 \subset \ldots \subset T_n = T' | |
| $$ | |
| and every such chain has the same (finite) length. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-catenary-the-same} | |
| Show that the notion of catenary defined in | |
| Algebra, Definition \ref{algebra-definition-catenary} | |
| agrees with the notion of Definition \ref{definition-catenary} | |
| for Noetherian rings. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-Noetherian-local-domain-dim-2-catenary} | |
| Show that a Noetherian local domain of dimension $2$ is catenary. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-finite-type-over-field-catenary} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. | |
| Show that a finite type $k$-algebra is catenary. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-example-no-dim-function} | |
| Give an example of a finite, sober, catenary topological space | |
| $X$ which does not have a dimension function $\delta : X \to \mathbf{Z}$. | |
| Here $\delta : X \to \mathbf{Z}$ is a dimension function if | |
| for $x, y \in X$ we have | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $x \leadsto y$ and $x \not = y$ implies $\delta(x) > \delta(y)$, | |
| \item $x \leadsto y$ and $\delta(x) \geq \delta(y) + 2$ implies | |
| there exists a $z \in X$ with $x \leadsto z \leadsto y$ and | |
| $\delta(x) > \delta(z) > \delta(y)$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| Describe your space clearly and succintly explain why there | |
| cannot be a dimension function. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Fraction fields} | |
| \label{section-fraction-fields} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-find-fraction-field} | |
| Consider the domain | |
| $$ | |
| {\mathbf Q}[r, s, t]/(s^2-(r-1)(r-2)(r-3), t^2-(r + 1)(r + 2)(r + 3)). | |
| $$ | |
| Find a domain of the form ${\mathbf Q}[x, y]/(f)$ with isomorphic | |
| field of fractions. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Transcendence degree} | |
| \label{section-transcendence} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-algebraic-extension} | |
| Let $K'/K/k$ be field extensions with $K'$ | |
| algebraic over $K$. Prove that $\text{trdeg}_k(K) = \text{trdeg}_k(K')$. | |
| (Hint: Show that if $x_1, \ldots, x_d \in K$ are algebraically independent | |
| over $k$ and $d < \text{trdeg}_k(K')$ then $k(x_1, \ldots, x_d) \subset K$ | |
| cannot be algebraic.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-growth-powers-subvector-space} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $K/k$ be a finitely generated extension | |
| of transcendence degree $d$. | |
| If $V, W \subset K$ are finite dimensional $k$-subvector spaces | |
| denote | |
| $$ | |
| VW = \{f \in K \mid f = \sum\nolimits_{i = 1, \ldots, n} v_i w_i | |
| \text{ for some }n\text{ and }v_i \in V, w_i \in W\} | |
| $$ | |
| This is a finite dimensional $k$-subvector space. | |
| Set $V^2 = VV$, $V^3 = V V^2$, etc. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show you can find $V \subset K$ and $\epsilon > 0$ such that | |
| $\dim V^n \geq \epsilon n^d$ for all $n \geq 1$. | |
| \item Conversely, show that for every finite dimensional $V \subset K$ | |
| there exists a $C > 0$ such that $\dim V^n \leq C n^d$ for all $n \geq 1$. | |
| (One possible way to proceed: | |
| First do this for subvector spaces of $k[x_1, \ldots, x_d]$. | |
| Then do this for subvector spaces of $k(x_1, \ldots, x_d)$. | |
| Finally, if $K/k(x_1, \ldots, x_d)$ is a finite extension | |
| choose a basis of $K$ over $k(x_1, \ldots, x_d)$ and | |
| argue using expansion in terms of this basis.) | |
| \item Conclude that you can redefine the transcendence degree in terms | |
| of growth of powers of finite dimensional subvector spaces of $K$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| This is related to Gelfand-Kirillov dimension of (noncommutative) | |
| algebras over $k$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Dimension of fibres} | |
| \label{section-dimension-fibres} | |
| \noindent | |
| Some questions related to the dimension formula, see | |
| Algebra, Section \ref{algebra-section-dimension-formula}. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-nr-components-fibre} | |
| Let $k$ be your favorite algebraically closed field. | |
| Below $k[x]$ and $k[x, y]$ denote the polynomial rings. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item For every integer $n \geq 0$ find a finite type extension | |
| $k[x] \subset A$ of domains such that the spectrum of $A/xA$ | |
| has exactly $n$ irreducible components. | |
| \item Make an example of a finite type extension $k[x] \subset A$ | |
| of domains such that the spectrum of $A/(x - \alpha)A$ | |
| is nonempty and reducible for every $\alpha \in k$. | |
| \item Make an example of a finite type extension $k[x, y] \subset A$ | |
| of domains such that the spectrum of $A/(x - \alpha, y - \beta)A$ | |
| is irreducible\footnote{Recall that irreducible implies nonempty.} | |
| for all $(\alpha, \beta) \in k^2 \setminus \{(0, 0)\}$ | |
| and the spectrum of $A/(x, y)A$ is nonempty and reducible. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-codim-1} | |
| Let $k$ be your favorite algebraically closed field. | |
| Let $n \geq 1$. | |
| Let $k[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ be the polynomial ring. | |
| Set $\mathfrak m = (x_1, \ldots, x_n)$. | |
| Let $k[x_1, \ldots, x_n] \subset A$ be a finite type extension of | |
| domains. Set $d = \dim(A)$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that $d - 1 \geq \dim(A/\mathfrak m A) \geq d - n$ | |
| if $A/\mathfrak mA \not = 0$. | |
| \item Show by example that every value can occur. | |
| \item Show by example that $\Spec(A/\mathfrak m A)$ can | |
| have irreducible components of different dimensions. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Finite locally free modules} | |
| \label{section-finite-locally-free} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-finite-locally-free} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring. Recall that a {\it finite locally free} $A$-module | |
| $M$ is a module such that for every ${\mathfrak p} \in \Spec(A)$ | |
| there exists an | |
| $f\in A$, $f \not \in {\mathfrak p}$ such that $M_f$ is a finite free | |
| $A_f$-module. We say $M$ is an {\it invertible module} if | |
| $M$ is finite locally free of rank $1$, i.e., for every | |
| ${\mathfrak p} \in \Spec(A)$ there exists an | |
| $f\in A$, $f \not \in \mathfrak p$ such that $M_f \cong A_f$ | |
| as an $A_f$-module. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-tensor-finite-locally-free} | |
| Prove that the tensor product of finite locally free modules | |
| is finite locally free. Prove that the tensor product of two | |
| invertible modules is invertible. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-class-group} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring. The {\it class group of $A$}, sometimes called | |
| the {\it Picard group of $A$} is the set $\Pic(A)$ | |
| of isomorphism classes of invertible $A$-modules endowed with | |
| a group operation defined by tensor product (see | |
| Exercise \ref{exercise-tensor-finite-locally-free}). | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \noindent | |
| Note that the class group of $A$ is trivial exactly when every invertible | |
| module is isomorphic to a free module of rank 1. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-class-group-trivial} | |
| Show that the class groups of the following rings are trivial | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item a polynomial ring $A = k[x]$ where $k$ is a field, | |
| \item the integers $A = \mathbf{Z}$, | |
| \item a polynomial ring $A = k[x, y]$ where $k$ is a field, and | |
| \item the quotient $k[x, y]/(xy)$ where $k$ is a field. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-class-group-not-trivial} | |
| Show that the class group of the ring | |
| $A = k[x, y]/(y^2 - f(x))$ where $k$ is a field of characteristic not $2$ | |
| and where $f(x) = (x - t_1) \ldots (x - t_n)$ with $t_1, \ldots, t_n \in k$ | |
| distinct and $n \geq 3$ an odd integer is not trivial. (Hint: Show that the | |
| ideal $(y, x - t_1)$ defines a nontrivial element of $\Pic(A)$.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-trace-det} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Suppose that $M$ is a finite locally free $A$-module, and | |
| suppose that $\varphi : M \to M$ is an endomorphism. Define/construct | |
| the {\it trace} and {\it determinant} of $\varphi$ and prove that your | |
| construction is ``functorial in the triple $(A, M, \varphi)$''. | |
| \item Show that if $M, N$ are finite locally free $A$-modules, | |
| and if $\varphi : M \to N$ and $\psi : N \to M$ then | |
| $\text{Trace}(\varphi \circ \psi) = \text{Trace}(\psi \circ \varphi)$ and | |
| $\det(\varphi \circ \psi) = \det(\psi \circ \varphi)$. | |
| \item In case $M$ is finite locally free show that | |
| $\text{Trace}$ defines an $A$-linear map $\text{End}_A(M) \to A$ and | |
| $\det$ defines a multiplicative map $\text{End}_A(M) \to A$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-trace-det-rings} | |
| Now suppose that $B$ is an $A$-algebra which is finite | |
| locally free as an $A$-module, in other words $B$ is a finite locally | |
| free $A$-algebra. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Define $\text{Trace}_{B/A}$ and $\text{Norm}_{B/A}$ using | |
| $\text{Trace}$ and $\det$ from Exercise \ref{exercise-trace-det}. | |
| \item Let $b\in B$ and let $\pi : \Spec(B) \to \Spec(A)$ be | |
| the induced morphism. Show that $\pi(V(b)) = V(\text{Norm}_{B/A}(b))$. | |
| (Recall that $V(f) = \{ {\mathfrak p} \mid f \in {\mathfrak p}\}$.) | |
| \item (Base change.) Suppose that $i : A \to A'$ is a ring map. Set | |
| $B' = B \otimes_A A'$. Indicate why $i(\text{Norm}_{B/A}(b))$ equals | |
| $\text{Norm}_{B'/A'}(b \otimes 1)$. | |
| \item Compute $\text{Norm}_{B/A}(b)$ when | |
| $B = A \times A \times A \times \ldots \times A$ | |
| and $b = (a_1, \ldots, a_n)$. | |
| \item Compute the norm of $y-y^3$ under the finite flat | |
| map ${\mathbf Q}[x] \to {\mathbf Q}[y]$, $x \to y^n$. (Hint: use | |
| the ``base change'' | |
| $A = {\mathbf Q}[x] \subset A' = {\mathbf Q}(\zeta_n)(x^{1/n})$.) | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Glueing} | |
| \label{section-glueing} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-cover} | |
| Suppose that $A$ is a ring and $M$ is an $A$-module. | |
| Let $f_i$, $i \in I$ be a collection of elements of $A$ such that | |
| $$ | |
| \Spec(A) = \bigcup D(f_i). | |
| $$ | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that if $M_{f_i}$ is a finite $A_{f_i}$-module, | |
| then $M$ is a finite $A$-module. | |
| \item Show that if $M_{f_i}$ is a flat $A_{f_i}$-module, | |
| then $M$ is a flat $A$-module. | |
| (This is kind of silly if you think about it right.) | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-cover} | |
| In algebraic geometric language this means that the property | |
| of ``being finitely generated'' or ``being flat'' is local for the Zariski | |
| topology (in a suitable sense). You can also show this for the property | |
| ``being of finite presentation''. | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-cover-ring-map} | |
| Suppose that $A \to B$ is a ring map. | |
| Let $f_i \in A$, $i \in I$ and $g_j \in B$, $j \in J$ be collections of | |
| elements such that | |
| $$ | |
| \Spec(A) = \bigcup D(f_i) | |
| \quad\text{and}\quad | |
| \Spec(B) = \bigcup D(g_j). | |
| $$ | |
| Show that if $A_{f_i} \to B_{f_ig_j}$ is of finite type for all $i, j$ | |
| then $A \to B$ is of finite type. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Going up and going down} | |
| \label{section-going-up} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-GU-GD} | |
| Let $\phi : A \to B$ be a homomorphism of rings. We say | |
| that the {\it going-up theorem} holds for $\phi$ if the | |
| following condition is satisfied: | |
| \begin{itemize} | |
| \item[(GU)] for any ${\mathfrak p}, {\mathfrak p}' \in \Spec(A)$ such that | |
| ${\mathfrak p} \subset {\mathfrak p}'$, and for any $P \in \Spec(B)$ lying | |
| over ${\mathfrak p}$, there exists $P'\in \Spec(B)$ lying | |
| over ${\mathfrak p}'$ such that $P \subset P'$. | |
| \end{itemize} | |
| Similarly, we say that the {\it going-down theorem} holds for $\phi$ | |
| if the following condition is satisfied: | |
| \begin{itemize} | |
| \item[(GD)] for any ${\mathfrak p}, {\mathfrak p}' \in \Spec(A)$ such that | |
| ${\mathfrak p} \subset {\mathfrak p}'$, and for any | |
| $P' \in \Spec(B)$ lying | |
| over ${\mathfrak p}'$, there exists $P\in \Spec(B)$ lying | |
| over ${\mathfrak p}$ such that $P \subset P'$. | |
| \end{itemize} | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-GU-GD} | |
| In each of the following cases determine whether | |
| (GU), (GD) holds, and explain why. (Use any Prop/Thm/Lemma you can find, | |
| but check the hypotheses in each case.) | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $k$ is a field, $A = k$, $B = k[x]$. | |
| \item $k$ is a field, $A = k[x]$, $B = k[x, y]$. | |
| \item $A = {\mathbf Z}$, $B = {\mathbf Z}[1/11]$. | |
| \item $k$ is an algebraically closed field, $A = k[x, y]$, | |
| $B = k[x, y, z]/(x^2-y, z^2-x)$. | |
| \item $A = {\mathbf Z}$, $B = {\mathbf Z}[i, 1/(2 + i)]$. | |
| \item $A = {\mathbf Z}$, $B = {\mathbf Z}[i, 1/(14 + 7i)]$. | |
| \item $k$ is an algebraically closed field, $A = k[x]$, | |
| $B = k[x, y, 1/(xy-1)]/(y^2-y)$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-image} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring. Let $B = A[x]$ be the polynomial algebra in | |
| one variable over $A$. Let $f = a_0 + a_1 x + \ldots + a_r x^r \in B = A[x]$. | |
| Prove carefully that the image of $D(f)$ in $\Spec(A)$ is equal to | |
| $D(a_0) \cup \ldots \cup D(a_r)$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-images} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Compute the image in | |
| $\Spec(k[x, y])$ | |
| of the following maps: | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $\Spec(k[x, yx^{-1}]) \to \Spec(k[x, y])$, where | |
| $k[x, y] \subset k[x, yx^{-1}] \subset k[x, y, x^{-1}]$. | |
| (Hint: To avoid confusion, give the element $yx^{-1}$ another name.) | |
| \item $\Spec(k[x, y, a, b]/(ax-by-1))\to \Spec(k[x, y])$. | |
| \item $\Spec(k[t, 1/(t-1)]) \to \Spec(k[x, y])$, induced by $x | |
| \mapsto t^2$, | |
| and $y \mapsto t^3$. | |
| \item $k = {\mathbf C}$ (complex numbers), | |
| $\Spec(k[s, t]/(s^3 + t^3-1)) \to \Spec(k[x, y])$, where | |
| $x\mapsto s^2$, $y \mapsto t^2$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-elimination-theory} | |
| Finding the image as above usually is done by using elimination theory. | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \section{Fitting ideals} | |
| \label{section-fitting-ideals} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-fitting} | |
| Let $R$ be a ring and let $M$ be a finite $R$-module. | |
| Choose a presentation | |
| $$ | |
| \bigoplus\nolimits_{j \in J} R \longrightarrow R^{\oplus n} | |
| \longrightarrow M \longrightarrow 0. | |
| $$ | |
| of $M$. Note that the map $R^{\oplus n} \to M$ is given by a sequence | |
| of elements $x_1, \ldots, x_n$ of $M$. The elements $x_i$ | |
| are {\it generators} of $M$. The map $\bigoplus_{j \in J} R \to R^{\oplus n}$ | |
| is given by a $n \times J$ matrix $A$ with coefficients in $R$. | |
| In other words, $A = (a_{ij})_{i = 1, \ldots, n, j \in J}$. | |
| The columns $(a_{1j}, \ldots, a_{nj})$, $j \in J$ of $A$ | |
| are said to be the {\it relations}. Any vector $(r_i) \in R^{\oplus n}$ | |
| such that $\sum r_i x_i = 0$ is a linear combination of the columns of $A$. | |
| Of course any finite $R$-module has a lot of different presentations. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that the ideal generated by the $(n - k) \times (n - k)$ minors of | |
| $A$ is independent of the choice of the presentation. | |
| This ideal is the {\it $k$th Fitting ideal of $M$}. Notation $Fit_k(M)$. | |
| \item Show that | |
| $Fit_0(M) \subset Fit_1(M) \subset Fit_2(M) \subset \ldots$. | |
| (Hint: Use that a determinant can be computed by expanding along a column.) | |
| \item Show that the following are equivalent: | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $Fit_{r - 1}(M) = (0)$ and $Fit_r(M) = R$, and | |
| \item $M$ is locally free of rank $r$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Hilbert functions} | |
| \label{section-hilbert} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-numerical-polynomial} | |
| A {\it numerical polynomial} is a polynomial $f(x) \in {\mathbf Q}[x]$ | |
| such that $f(n) \in {\mathbf Z}$ for every integer $n$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-graded-module} | |
| A {\it graded module} $M$ over a ring $A$ is an $A$-module $M$ | |
| endowed with a direct sum decomposition | |
| $ | |
| \bigoplus\nolimits_{n \in {\mathbf Z}} M_n | |
| $ | |
| into $A$-submodules. We will say that $M$ is {\it locally finite} if all of | |
| the $M_n$ are finite $A$-modules. Suppose that $A$ is a Noetherian ring and | |
| that $\varphi$ is a {\it Euler-Poincar\'e function} on finite $A$-modules. | |
| This means that for every finitely generated $A$-module $M$ we are given an | |
| integer $\varphi(M) \in {\mathbf Z}$ and for every short exact sequence | |
| $$ | |
| 0 | |
| \longrightarrow | |
| M' | |
| \longrightarrow | |
| M | |
| \longrightarrow | |
| M'' | |
| \longrightarrow | |
| 0 | |
| $$ | |
| we have $\varphi(M) = \varphi(M') + \varphi(M'')$. The {\it Hilbert function} | |
| of a locally finite graded module $M$ (with respect to $\varphi$) is the | |
| function $\chi_\varphi(M, n) = \varphi(M_n)$. We say that $M$ has a | |
| {\it Hilbert polynomial} if there is some numerical polynomial | |
| $P_\varphi$ such that $\chi_\varphi(M, n) = P_\varphi(n)$ for all sufficiently | |
| large integers $n$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-graded-algebra} | |
| A {\it graded $A$-algebra} is a graded $A$-module | |
| $B = \bigoplus_{n \geq 0} B_n$ together with an $A$-bilinear map | |
| $$ | |
| B \times B \longrightarrow B, \ (b, b') \longmapsto bb' | |
| $$ | |
| that turns $B$ into an $A$-algebra so that $B_n \cdot B_m \subset B_{n + m}$. | |
| Finally, a {\it graded module $M$ over a graded $A$-algebra $B$} is given | |
| by a graded $A$-module $M$ together with a (compatible) $B$-module structure | |
| such that $B_n \cdot M_d \subset M_{n + d}$. Now you can define | |
| {\it homomorphisms of graded modules/rings}, {\it graded submodules}, | |
| {\it graded ideals}, {\it exact sequences of graded modules}, etc, etc. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-Euler-Poincare-field} | |
| Let $A = k$ a field. What are all possible Euler-Poincar\'e functions | |
| on finite $A$-modules in this case? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-Euler-Poincare-Z} | |
| Let $A ={\mathbf Z}$. What are all possible Euler-Poincar\'e functions | |
| on finite $A$-modules in this case? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-Euler-Poincare-node} | |
| Let $A = k[x, y]/(xy)$ with $k$ algebraically closed. What are all | |
| possible Euler-Poincar\'e functions on finite $A$-modules in this case? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-kernel-locally-finite} | |
| Suppose that $A$ is Noetherian. Show that the kernel of a map | |
| of locally finite graded $A$-modules is locally finite. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-no-hilbert} | |
| Let $k$ be a field and let $A = k$ and $B = k[x, y]$ with grading | |
| determined by $\deg(x) = 2$ and $\deg(y) = 3$. Let $\varphi(M) = \dim_k(M)$. | |
| Compute the Hilbert function of $B$ as a graded $k$-module. Is there | |
| a Hilbert polynomial in this case? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-no-hilbert-or-is-there} | |
| Let $k$ be a field and let $A = k$ and $B = k[x, y]/(x^2, xy)$ with grading | |
| determined by $\deg(x) = 2$ and $\deg(y) = 3$. Let $\varphi(M) = \dim_k(M)$. | |
| Compute the Hilbert function of $B$ as a graded $k$-module. Is there | |
| a Hilbert polynomial in this case? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-hilbert-to-compute} | |
| Let $k$ be a field and let $A = k$. Let $\varphi(M) = \dim_k(M)$. | |
| Fix $d\in {\mathbf N}$. Consider the graded $A$-algebra | |
| $B = k[x, y, z]/(x^d + y^d + z^d)$, where $x, y, z$ each have degree $1$. | |
| Compute the Hilbert function of $B$. Is there a Hilbert polynomial | |
| in this case? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Proj of a ring} | |
| \label{section-proj-ring} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-homogeneous-ideal} | |
| Let $R$ be a graded ring. A {\it homogeneous} ideal is simply an ideal | |
| $I \subset R$ which is also a graded submodule of $R$. Equivalently, | |
| it is an ideal generated by homogeneous elements. Equivalently, if | |
| $f \in I$ and | |
| $$ | |
| f = f_0 + f_1 + \ldots + f_n | |
| $$ | |
| is the decomposition of $f$ into homogeneous pieces in $R$ then $f_i \in I$ | |
| for each $i$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-Proj-R} | |
| We define the {\it homogeneous spectrum $\text{Proj}(R)$} | |
| of the graded ring $R$ to be the set of homogeneous, prime ideals | |
| ${\mathfrak p}$ of $R$ such that $R_{+} \not \subset {\mathfrak p}$. | |
| Note that $\text{Proj}(R)$ is a subset of $\Spec(R)$ and hence has a | |
| natural induced topology. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-Dplus-Vplus} | |
| Let $R = \oplus_{d \geq 0} R_d$ be a graded ring, let $f\in R_d$ and | |
| assume that $d \geq 1$. We define {\it $R_{(f)}$} to be the subring of | |
| $R_f$ consisting of elements of the form $r/f^n$ with $r$ homogeneous and | |
| $\deg(r) = nd$. Furthermore, we define | |
| $$ | |
| D_{+}(f) = \{ {\mathfrak p} \in \text{Proj}(R) | f \not\in {\mathfrak p} \}. | |
| $$ | |
| Finally, for a homogeneous ideal $I \subset R$ we define | |
| $V_{+}(I) = V(I) \cap \text{Proj}(R)$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-topology-proj} | |
| On the topology on $\text{Proj}(R)$. With definitions and notation as | |
| above prove the following statements. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that $D_{+}(f)$ is open in $\text{Proj}(R)$. | |
| \item Show that $D_{+}(ff') = D_{+}(f) \cap D_{+}(f')$. | |
| \item Let $g = g_0 + \ldots + g_m$ be an element | |
| of $R$ with $g_i \in R_i$. Express $D(g) \cap \text{Proj}(R)$ | |
| in terms of $D_{+}(g_i)$, $i \geq 1$ and $D(g_0) \cap \text{Proj}(R)$. | |
| No proof necessary. | |
| \item Let $g\in R_0$ be a homogeneous element of degree $0$. | |
| Express $D(g) \cap \text{Proj}(R)$ in terms of $D_{+}(f_\alpha)$ | |
| for a suitable family $f_\alpha \in R$ of homogeneous elements of | |
| positive degree. | |
| \item Show that the collection $\{D_{+}(f)\}$ of opens forms a | |
| basis for the topology of $\text{Proj}(R)$. | |
| \item | |
| \label{item-bijection} | |
| Show that there is a canonical bijection $D_{+}(f) \to \Spec(R_{(f)})$. | |
| (Hint: Imitate the proof for $\Spec$ but at some point thrown in the | |
| radical of an ideal.) | |
| \item Show that the map from (\ref{item-bijection}) is a homeomorphism. | |
| \item Give an example of an $R$ such that $\text{Proj}(R)$ is not | |
| quasi-compact. No proof necessary. | |
| \item Show that any closed subset $T \subset \text{Proj}(R)$ is of | |
| the form $V_{+}(I)$ for some homogeneous ideal $I \subset R$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-continuous-proj-spec} | |
| There is a continuous map $ \text{Proj}(R) \longrightarrow \Spec(R_0) $. | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-iso-polynomial-ring-one-variable} | |
| If $R = A[X]$ with $\deg(X) = 1$, show that the natural map | |
| $\text{Proj}(R) \to \Spec(A)$ is a bijection and in fact | |
| a homeomorphism. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-blowing-up-I} | |
| Blowing up: part I. | |
| In this exercise $R = Bl_I(A) = A \oplus I \oplus I^2 \oplus \ldots$. | |
| Consider the natural map $b : \text{Proj}(R) \to \Spec(A)$. | |
| Set $U = \Spec(A) - V(I)$. Show that | |
| $$ | |
| b : b^{-1}(U) \longrightarrow U | |
| $$ | |
| is a homeomorphism. | |
| Thus we may think of $U$ as an open subset of $\text{Proj}(R)$. | |
| Let $Z \subset \Spec(A)$ be an irreducible closed subscheme | |
| with generic point $\xi \in Z$. Assume that $\xi \not\in V(I)$, | |
| in other words $Z \not\subset V(I)$, in other words | |
| $\xi \in U$, in other words $Z\cap U \not = \emptyset$. We define | |
| the {\it strict transform} $Z'$ of $Z$ to be the closure of the unique | |
| point $\xi'$ lying above $\xi$. Another way to say this is that | |
| $Z'$ is the closure in $\text{Proj}(R)$ of the locally closed subset | |
| $Z\cap U \subset U \subset \text{Proj}(R)$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-blowing-up-II} | |
| Blowing up: Part II. | |
| Let $A = k[x, y]$ where $k$ is a field, and let $I = (x, y)$. | |
| Let $R$ be the blowup algebra for $A$ and $I$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that the strict transforms of $Z_1 = V(\{x\})$ and | |
| $Z_2 = V(\{y\})$ are disjoint. | |
| \item Show that the strict transforms of $Z_1 = V(\{x\})$ and | |
| $Z_2 = V(\{x-y^2\})$ are not disjoint. | |
| \item Find an ideal $J \subset A$ such that $V(J) = V(I)$ | |
| and such that the strict transforms of $Z_1 = V(\{x\})$ and | |
| $Z_2 = V(\{x-y^2\})$ in the blowup along $J$ are disjoint. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-proj-when-empty} | |
| Let $R$ be a graded ring. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that $\text{Proj}(R)$ is empty if $R_n = (0)$ for all $n >> 0$. | |
| \item Show that $\text{Proj}(R)$ is an irreducible topological space | |
| if $R$ is a domain and $R_{+}$ is not zero. (Recall that the empty | |
| topological space is not irreducible.) | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-blowing-up-III} | |
| Blowing up: Part III. | |
| Consider $A$, $I$ and $U$, $Z$ as in the definition of strict transform. | |
| Let $Z = V({\mathfrak p})$ for some prime ideal ${\mathfrak p}$. Let $\bar A = | |
| A/{\mathfrak p}$ and let | |
| $\bar I$ be the image of $I$ in $\bar A$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that there exists a surjective ring map | |
| $R: = Bl_I(A) \to \bar R: = Bl_{\bar I}(\bar A)$. | |
| \item Show that the ring map above induces a bijective map | |
| from $\text{Proj}(\bar R)$ onto the strict transform $Z'$ of $Z$. (This | |
| is not so easy. Hint: Use 5(b) above.) | |
| \item Conclude that the strict transform $Z' = V_{+}(P)$ where | |
| $P \subset R$ is the homogeneous ideal defined by | |
| $P_d = I^d \cap {\mathfrak p}$. | |
| \item Suppose that $Z_1 = V({\mathfrak p})$ and | |
| $Z_2 = V({\mathfrak q})$ are irreducible | |
| closed subsets defined by prime ideals such that $Z_1 \not \subset Z_2$, | |
| and $Z_2 \not \subset Z_1$. Show that blowing up the ideal | |
| $I = {\mathfrak p} + {\mathfrak q}$ separates the | |
| strict transforms of $Z_1$ and $Z_2$, | |
| i.e., $Z_1' \cap Z_2' = \emptyset$. (Hint: Consider the homogeneous | |
| ideal $P$ and $Q$ from part (c) and consider $V(P + Q)$.) | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Cohen-Macaulay rings of dimension 1} | |
| \label{section-CM-dim-1} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-CM} | |
| A Noetherian local ring $A$ is said to be {\it Cohen-Macaulay} | |
| of dimension $d$ if it has dimension $d$ and there exists a system | |
| of parameters $x_1, \ldots, x_d$ for $A$ such that $x_i$ is a nonzerodivisor | |
| in $A/(x_1, \ldots, x_{i-1})$ for $i = 1, \ldots, d$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-CM-dim-1-I} | |
| Cohen-Macaulay rings of dimension 1. Part I: Theory. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Let $(A, {\mathfrak m})$ be a local Noetherian with $\dim A = 1$. | |
| Show that if $x\in {\mathfrak m}$ is not a zerodivisor then | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $\dim A/xA = 0$, in other words $A/xA$ is Artinian, | |
| in other words $\{x\}$ is a system of parameters for $A$. | |
| \item $A$ is has no embedded prime. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \item Conversely, let $(A, {\mathfrak m})$ be a local Noetherian ring of | |
| dimension $1$. Show that if $A$ has no embedded prime then there exists | |
| a nonzerodivisor in ${\mathfrak m}$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-CM-dim-1-II} | |
| Cohen-Macaulay rings of dimension 1. Part II: Examples. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Let $A$ be the local ring at $(x, y)$ of $k[x, y]/(x^2, xy)$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that $A$ has dimension 1. | |
| \item Prove that every element of ${\mathfrak m}\subset A$ is a | |
| zerodivisor. | |
| \item Find $z\in {\mathfrak m}$ such that $\dim A/zA = 0$ | |
| (no proof required). | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \item Let $A$ be the local ring at $(x, y)$ of $k[x, y]/(x^2)$. | |
| Find a nonzerodivisor in ${\mathfrak m}$ (no proof required). | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-embedding-dim-1} | |
| Local rings of embedding dimension $1$. | |
| Suppose that $(A, {\mathfrak m}, k)$ is a Noetherian local ring | |
| of embedding dimension $1$, i.e., | |
| $$ | |
| \dim_k {\mathfrak m}/{\mathfrak m}^2 = 1. | |
| $$ | |
| Show that the function $f(n) = \dim_k {\mathfrak m}^n/{\mathfrak m}^{n + 1}$ | |
| is either constant with value $1$, or its values are | |
| $$ | |
| 1, 1, \ldots, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, \ldots | |
| $$ | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-regular-local-dim-1} | |
| Regular local rings of dimension $1$. | |
| Suppose that $(A, {\mathfrak m}, k)$ is a regular Noetherian local ring of | |
| dimension $1$. Recall that this means that $A$ has dimension $1$ | |
| and embedding dimension $1$, i.e., | |
| $$ | |
| \dim_k {\mathfrak m}/{\mathfrak m}^2 = 1. | |
| $$ | |
| Let $x\in{\mathfrak m}$ be any element whose class in ${\mathfrak m}/{\mathfrak | |
| m}^2$ is not zero. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that for every element $y$ | |
| of ${\mathfrak m}$ there exists an integer $n$ such that $y$ can be written as | |
| $y = ux^n$ with $u\in A^\ast$ a unit. | |
| \item Show that $x$ is a nonzerodivisor in $A$. | |
| \item Conclude that $A$ is a domain. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-nonzerodivisor-graded} | |
| Let $(A, {\mathfrak m}, k)$ be a Noetherian local ring with associated | |
| graded $Gr_{\mathfrak m}(A)$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Suppose that $x\in {\mathfrak m}^d$ maps to a nonzerodivisor | |
| $\bar x \in {\mathfrak m}^d/{\mathfrak m}^{d + 1}$ in degree $d$ of | |
| $Gr_{\mathfrak m}(A)$. | |
| Show that $x$ is a nonzerodivisor. | |
| \item Suppose the depth of $A$ is at least $1$. | |
| Namely, suppose that there exists a nonzerodivisor $y \in {\mathfrak m}$. | |
| In this case we can do better: assume just that $x\in {\mathfrak m}^d$ maps to | |
| the element $\bar x \in {\mathfrak m}^d/{\mathfrak m}^{d + 1}$ in degree $d$ | |
| of $Gr_{\mathfrak m}(A)$ which is a nonzerodivisor on sufficiently | |
| high degrees: $\exists N$ such that for all $n \geq N$ the map | |
| of multiplication by $\bar x$ | |
| $$ | |
| {\mathfrak m}^n/{\mathfrak m}^{n + 1} \longrightarrow | |
| {\mathfrak m}^{n + d}/{\mathfrak m}^{n + d + 1} | |
| $$ | |
| is injective. Then show that $x$ is a nonzerodivisor. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-embedding-2-dim-1} | |
| Suppose that $(A, {\mathfrak m}, k)$ is a Noetherian local ring of | |
| dimension $1$. Assume also that the embedding dimension of $A$ is | |
| $2$, i.e., assume that | |
| $$ | |
| \dim_k {\mathfrak m}/{\mathfrak m}^2 = 2. | |
| $$ | |
| Notation: $f(n) = \dim_k {\mathfrak m}^n/{\mathfrak m}^{n + 1}$. | |
| Pick generators $x, y \in {\mathfrak m}$ | |
| and write $Gr_{\mathfrak m}(A) = k[\bar x, \bar y]/I$ for some | |
| homogeneous ideal $I$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that there exists a homogeneous element | |
| $F\in k[\bar x, \bar y]$ such that $I \subset (F)$ with equality | |
| in all sufficiently high degrees. | |
| \item Show that $f(n) \leq n + 1$. | |
| \item Show that if $f(n) < n + 1$ then $n \geq \deg(F)$. | |
| \item Show that if $f(n) < n + 1$, then $f(n + 1) \leq f(n)$. | |
| \item Show that $f(n) = \deg(F)$ for all $n >> 0$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-CM-dim-1-embedding-dim-2} | |
| Cohen-Macaulay rings of dimension 1 and embedding dimension 2. | |
| Suppose that $(A, {\mathfrak m}, k)$ is a Noetherian local ring which is | |
| Cohen-Macaulay | |
| of dimension $1$. Assume also that the embedding dimension of $A$ is | |
| $2$, i.e., assume that | |
| $$ | |
| \dim_k {\mathfrak m}/{\mathfrak m}^2 = 2. | |
| $$ | |
| Notations: $f$, $F$, $x, y\in {\mathfrak m}$, $I$ as in Ex.\ 6 above. Please | |
| use any results from the problems above. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Suppose that $z\in {\mathfrak m}$ is an element whose class | |
| in ${\mathfrak m}/{\mathfrak m}^2$ is a linear form | |
| $\alpha \bar x + \beta \bar y \in k[\bar x, \bar y]$ | |
| which is coprime with $f$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that $z$ is a nonzerodivisor on $A$. | |
| \item Let $d = \deg(F)$. | |
| Show that ${\mathfrak m}^n = z^{n + 1-d}{\mathfrak m}^{d-1}$ | |
| for all sufficiently large $n$. (Hint: First show | |
| $z^{n + 1-d}{\mathfrak m}^{d-1} \to {\mathfrak m}^n/{\mathfrak m}^{n + 1}$ | |
| is surjective by what you know about $Gr_{\mathfrak m}(A)$. Then use NAK.) | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \item What condition on $k$ guarantees the existence of | |
| such a $z$? (No proof required; it's too easy.) | |
| \noindent | |
| Now we are going to assume there exists a $z$ as above. This turns out | |
| to be a harmless assumption (in the sense that you can reduce to | |
| the situation where it holds in order to obtain the results in | |
| parts (d) and (e) below). | |
| \item Now show that ${\mathfrak m}^\ell = z^{\ell - d + 1} {\mathfrak m}^{d-1}$ | |
| for all $\ell \geq d$. | |
| \item Conclude that $I = (F)$. | |
| \item Conclude that the function $f$ has values | |
| $$ | |
| 2, 3, 4, \ldots, d-1, d, d, d, d, d, d, d, \ldots | |
| $$ | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-CM-dim-1-embedding-dim-2} | |
| This suggests that a local Noetherian Cohen-Macaulay ring of dimension 1 | |
| and embedding dimension 2 is of the form $B/FB$, where $B$ is a 2-dimensional | |
| regular local ring. This is more or less true (under suitable ``niceness'' | |
| properties of the ring). | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \section{Infinitely many primes} | |
| \label{section-many-primes} | |
| \noindent | |
| A section with a collection of strange questions on rings where | |
| infinitely many primes are not invertible. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-not-in-Q} | |
| Give an example of a finite type ${\mathbf Z}$-algebra $R$ | |
| with the following two properties: | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item There is no ring map $R \to {\mathbf Q}$. | |
| \item For every prime $p$ there exists a maximal ideal | |
| ${\mathfrak m} \subset R$ such that $R/{\mathfrak m} \cong {\mathbf F}_p$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-strange-fp-1} | |
| For $f \in {\mathbf Z}[x, u]$ we define $f_p(x) | |
| = f(x, x^p) \bmod p \in {\mathbf F}_p[x]$. Give an example | |
| of an $f \in {\mathbf Z}[x, u]$ such that the following two | |
| properties hold: | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item There exist infinitely many $p$ such that $f_p$ | |
| does not have a zero in ${\mathbf F}_p$. | |
| \item For all $p >> 0$ the polynomial $f_p$ either has | |
| a linear or a quadratic factor. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-strange-fp-2} | |
| For $f \in {\mathbf Z}[x, y, u, v]$ we define $f_p(x, y) | |
| = f(x, y, x^p, y^p) \bmod p \in {\mathbf F}_p[x, y]$. Give an ``interesting'' | |
| example of an $f$ such that $f_p$ is reducible for all $p >> 0$. | |
| For example, $f = xv-yu$ with $f_p = xy^p-x^py = xy(x^{p-1}-y^{p-1})$ is | |
| ``uninteresting''; any $f$ depending only on $x, u$ is ``uninteresting'', | |
| etc. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-strange-fp} | |
| Let $h \in {\mathbf Z}[y]$ be a monic polynomial of degree $d$. | |
| Then: | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item The map $A = {\mathbf Z}[x] \to B ={\mathbf Z}[y]$, | |
| $x \mapsto h$ is finite locally free of rank $d$. | |
| \item For all primes $p$ the map | |
| $A_p = {\mathbf F}_p[x]\to B_p = {\mathbf F}_p[y]$, | |
| $y \mapsto h(y) \bmod p$ is finite locally free of rank $d$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-strange-fp-3} | |
| Let $h, A, B, A_p, B_p$ be as in the remark. For $f \in {\mathbf Z}[x, u]$ we | |
| define $f_p(x) = f(x, x^p) \bmod p \in {\mathbf F}_p[x]$. For | |
| $g \in {\mathbf Z}[y, v]$ we define | |
| $g_p(y) = g(y, y^p) \bmod p \in {\mathbf F}_p[y]$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Give an example of a $h$ and $g$ such that | |
| there does not exist a $f$ with the property | |
| $$ | |
| f_p = Norm_{B_p/A_p}(g_p). | |
| $$ | |
| \item Show that for any choice of $h$ and $g$ as above | |
| there exists a nonzero $f$ such that for all $p$ we have | |
| $$ | |
| Norm_{B_p/A_p}(g_p)\quad\text{divides}\quad f_p . | |
| $$ | |
| If you want you can restrict to the case $h = y^n$, even with $n = 2$, | |
| but it is true in general. | |
| \item Discuss the relevance of this to Exercises 6 and 7 of the previous | |
| set. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-strange-fp-unsolved} | |
| Unsolved problems. They may be really hard or they may be easy. | |
| I don't know. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Is there any $f \in {\mathbf Z}[x, u]$ such that $f_p$ is | |
| irreducible for an infinite number of $p$? (Hint: Yes, this happens for | |
| $f(x, u) = u - x - 1$ and also for $f(x, u) = u^2 - x^2 + 1$.) | |
| \item Let $f \in {\mathbf Z}[x, u]$ nonzero, and suppose | |
| $\deg_x(f_p) = dp + d'$ for all large $p$. (In other words $\deg_u(f) = d$ | |
| and the coefficient $c$ of $u^d$ in $f$ has $\deg_x(c) = d'$.) Suppose we | |
| can write $d = d_1 + d_2$ and $d' = d'_1 + d'_2$ with $d_1, d_2 > 0$ | |
| and $d'_1, d'_2 \geq 0$ such that for all sufficiently large $p$ | |
| there exists a factorization | |
| $$ | |
| f_p = f_{1, p} f_{2, p} | |
| $$ | |
| with $\deg_x(f_{1, p}) = d_1p + d'_1$. Is it true that $f$ comes about via a | |
| norm construction as in Exercise 4? (More precisely, are there a $h$ and | |
| $g$ such that $Norm_{B_p/A_p}(g_p)$ divides $f_p$ for all $p >> 0$.) | |
| \item Analogous question to the one in (b) but now with | |
| $f \in {\mathbf Z}[x_1, x_2, u_1, u_2]$ irreducible and just assuming that | |
| $f_p(x_1, x_2) = f(x_1, x_2, x_1^p, x_2^p) \bmod p$ factors for all | |
| $p >> 0$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Filtered derived category} | |
| \label{section-filtered-derived} | |
| \noindent | |
| In order to do the exercises in this section, please read the material | |
| in Homology, Section \ref{homology-section-filtrations}. We will say | |
| $A$ is a filtered object of $\mathcal{A}$, to mean that $A$ comes endowed | |
| with a filtration $F$ which we omit from the notation. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-split-injective} | |
| Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. | |
| Let $I$ be a filtered object of $\mathcal{A}$. | |
| Assume that the filtration on $I$ is finite | |
| and that each $\text{gr}^p(I)$ is an injective object of $\mathcal{A}$. | |
| Show that there exists an isomorphism | |
| $I \cong \bigoplus \text{gr}^p(I)$ with filtration | |
| $F^p(I)$ corresponding to $\bigoplus_{p' \geq p} \text{gr}^p(I)$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-filtered-injective} | |
| Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. | |
| Let $I$ be a filtered object of $\mathcal{A}$. | |
| Assume that the filtration on $I$ is finite. | |
| Show the following are equivalent: | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item For any solid diagram | |
| $$ | |
| \xymatrix{ | |
| A \ar[r]_\alpha \ar[d] & B \ar@{-->}[ld] \\ | |
| I & | |
| } | |
| $$ | |
| of filtered objects with | |
| (\romannumeral1) the filtrations on $A$ and $B$ are finite, | |
| and (\romannumeral2) $\text{gr}(\alpha)$ injective the | |
| dotted arrow exists making the diagram commute. | |
| \item Each $\text{gr}^p I$ is injective. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \noindent | |
| Note that given a morphism $\alpha : A \to B$ of filtered objects | |
| with finite filtrations to say that $\text{gr}(\alpha)$ injective | |
| is the same thing as saying that $\alpha$ is a {\it strict monomorphism} | |
| in the category $\text{Fil}(\mathcal{A})$. Namely, | |
| being a monomorphism means $\Ker(\alpha) = 0$ and strict means that | |
| this also implies $\Ker(\text{gr}(\alpha)) = 0$. | |
| See Homology, Lemma \ref{homology-lemma-characterize-strict}. | |
| (We only use the term ``injective'' for a morphism in an abelian category, | |
| although it makes sense in any additive category having kernels.) | |
| The exercises above justifies the following definition. | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-injective-filtered} | |
| Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. | |
| Let $I$ be a filtered object of $\mathcal{A}$. | |
| Assume the filtration on $I$ is finite. | |
| We say $I$ is {\it filtered injective} if each $\text{gr}^p(I)$ is | |
| an injective object of $\mathcal{A}$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \noindent | |
| We make the following definition to avoid having to keep saying | |
| ``with a finite filtration'' everywhere. | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-finite-filtration-category} | |
| Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. | |
| We denote {\it $\text{Fil}^f(\mathcal{A})$} the full subcategory | |
| of $\text{Fil}(\mathcal{A})$ whose objects consist of | |
| those $A \in \Ob(\text{Fil}(\mathcal{A}))$ | |
| whose filtration is finite. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-inject-into-injective} | |
| Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. | |
| Assume $\mathcal{A}$ has enough injectives. | |
| Let $A$ be an object of $\text{Fil}^f(\mathcal{A})$. | |
| Show that there exists a strict monomorphism $\alpha : A \to I$ | |
| of $A$ into a filtered injective object $I$ of $\text{Fil}^f(\mathcal{A})$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-filtered-quasi-isomorphism} | |
| Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. | |
| Let $\alpha : K^\bullet \to L^\bullet$ be a morphism of | |
| complexes of $\text{Fil}(\mathcal{A})$. We say that | |
| $\alpha$ is a {\it filtered quasi-isomorphism} if | |
| for each $p \in \mathbf{Z}$ the morphism | |
| $\text{gr}^p(K^\bullet) \to \text{gr}^p(L^\bullet)$ is | |
| a quasi-isomorphism. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-filtered-acyclic} | |
| Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. | |
| Let $K^\bullet$ be a complex of $\text{Fil}^f(\mathcal{A})$. | |
| We say that $K^\bullet$ is {\it filtered acyclic} if | |
| for each $p \in \mathbf{Z}$ the complex $\text{gr}^p(K^\bullet)$ is | |
| acyclic. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-filtered-quasi-isomorphism} | |
| Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. | |
| Let $\alpha : K^\bullet \to L^\bullet$ be a morphism of bounded below | |
| complexes of $\text{Fil}^f(\mathcal{A})$. (Note the superscript $f$.) | |
| Show that the following are equivalent: | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $\alpha$ is a filtered quasi-isomorphism, | |
| \item for each $p \in \mathbf{Z}$ the map | |
| $\alpha : F^pK^\bullet \to F^pL^\bullet$ is a quasi-isomorphism, | |
| \item for each $p \in \mathbf{Z}$ the map | |
| $\alpha : K^\bullet/F^pK^\bullet \to L^\bullet/F^pL^\bullet$ | |
| is a quasi-isomorphism, and | |
| \item the cone of $\alpha$ (see | |
| Derived Categories, Definition \ref{derived-definition-cone}) | |
| is a filtered acyclic complex. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| Moreover, show that if $\alpha$ is a filtered quasi-isomorphism | |
| then $\alpha$ is also a usual quasi-isomorphism. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-injective-resolution} | |
| Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. | |
| Assume $\mathcal{A}$ has enough injectives. | |
| Let $A$ be an object of $\text{Fil}^f(\mathcal{A})$. | |
| Show there exists a complex | |
| $I^\bullet$ of $\text{Fil}^f(\mathcal{A})$, | |
| and a morphism $A[0] \to I^\bullet$ such that | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item each $I^p$ is filtered injective, | |
| \item $I^p = 0$ for $p < 0$, and | |
| \item $A[0] \to I^\bullet$ is a filtered quasi-isomorphism. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-injective-resolution-complex} | |
| Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. | |
| Assume $\mathcal{A}$ has enough injectives. | |
| Let $K^\bullet$ be a bounded below complex of objects of | |
| $\text{Fil}^f(\mathcal{A})$. Show there exists a | |
| filtered quasi-isomorphism $\alpha : K^\bullet \to I^\bullet$ | |
| with $I^\bullet$ a complex of $\text{Fil}^f(\mathcal{A})$ | |
| having filtered injective terms $I^n$, and bounded below. | |
| In fact, we may choose $\alpha$ such that each $\alpha^n$ is | |
| a strict monomorphism. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-morphisms-lift} | |
| Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. | |
| Consider a solid diagram | |
| $$ | |
| \xymatrix{ | |
| K^\bullet \ar[r]_\alpha \ar[d]_\gamma & L^\bullet \ar@{-->}[dl]^\beta \\ | |
| I^\bullet | |
| } | |
| $$ | |
| of complexes of $\text{Fil}^f(\mathcal{A})$. Assume | |
| $K^\bullet$, $L^\bullet$ and $I^\bullet$ are bounded below and | |
| assume each $I^n$ is a filtered injective object. | |
| Also assume that $\alpha$ is a filtered quasi-isomorphism. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item There exists a map of complexes $\beta$ making the diagram | |
| commute up to homotopy. | |
| \item If $\alpha$ is a strict monomorphism in every degree | |
| then we can find a $\beta$ which makes the diagram commute. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-acyclic-is-zero} | |
| Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. | |
| Let $K^\bullet$, $K^\bullet$ be complexes of $\text{Fil}^f(\mathcal{A})$. | |
| Assume | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $K^\bullet$ bounded below and filtered acyclic, and | |
| \item $I^\bullet$ bounded below and consisting of filtered injective objects. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| Then any morphism $K^\bullet \to I^\bullet$ is homotopic to zero. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-morphisms-equal-up-to-homotopy} | |
| Let $\mathcal{A}$ be an abelian category. | |
| Consider a solid diagram | |
| $$ | |
| \xymatrix{ | |
| K^\bullet \ar[r]_\alpha \ar[d]_\gamma & L^\bullet \ar@{-->}[dl]^{\beta_i} \\ | |
| I^\bullet | |
| } | |
| $$ | |
| of complexes of $\text{Fil}^f(\mathcal{A})$. | |
| Assume $K^\bullet$, $L^\bullet$ and $I^\bullet$ bounded below and | |
| each $I^n$ a filtered injective | |
| object. Also assume $\alpha$ a filtered quasi-isomorphism. | |
| Any two morphisms $\beta_1, \beta_2$ making the diagram commute | |
| up to homotopy are homotopic. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Regular functions} | |
| \label{section-regular-functions} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-extra-function} | |
| Consider the affine curve $X$ given by the equation | |
| $t^2 = s^5 + 8$ in $\mathbf{C}^2$ with coordinates $s, t$. | |
| Let $x \in X$ be the point with coordinates $(1, 3)$. | |
| Let $U = X \setminus \{x\}$. Prove that there is a | |
| regular function on $U$ which is not the restriction | |
| of a regular function on $\mathbf{C}^2$, i.e., is not | |
| the restriction of a polynomial in $s$ and $t$ to $U$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-no-extra-function} | |
| Let $n \geq 2$. Let $E \subset \mathbf{C}^n$ be a finite subset. | |
| Show that any regular function on $\mathbf{C}^n \setminus E$ | |
| is a polynomial. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-cone} | |
| Let $X \subset \mathbf{C}^n$ be an affine variety. Let us say $X$ is a | |
| {\it cone} if $x = (a_1, \ldots, a_n) \in X$ and $\lambda \in \mathbf{C}$ | |
| implies $(\lambda a_1, \ldots, \lambda a_n) \in X$. | |
| Of course, if $\mathfrak p \subset \mathbf{C}[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ | |
| is a prime ideal generated by homogeneous polynomials in $x_1, \ldots, x_n$, | |
| then the affine variety $X = V(\mathfrak p) \subset \mathbf{C}^n$ is a cone. | |
| Show that conversely the prime ideal | |
| $\mathfrak p \subset \mathbf{C}[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ | |
| corresponding to a cone can be generated by homogeneous polynomials | |
| in $x_1, \ldots, x_n$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-extra-function-cone} | |
| Give an example of an affine variety $X \subset \mathbf{C}^n$ | |
| which is a cone (see Exercise \ref{exercise-cone}) | |
| and a regular function $f$ on $U = X \setminus \{(0, \ldots, 0)\}$ | |
| which is not the restriction of a polynomial | |
| function on $\mathbf{C}^n$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-regular-functions} | |
| In this exercise we try to see what happens with regular functions | |
| over non-algebraically closed fields. Let $k$ be a field. | |
| Let $Z \subset k^n$ be a Zariski locally closed subset, i.e., there | |
| exist ideals $I \subset J \subset k[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ such that | |
| $$ | |
| Z = \{a \in k^n \mid | |
| f(a) = 0\ \forall\ f \in I,\ \exists\ g \in J,\ g(a) \not = 0\}. | |
| $$ | |
| A function $\varphi : Z \to k$ is said to be {\it regular} if for every | |
| $z \in Z$ there exists a Zariski open neighbourhood $z \in U \subset Z$ | |
| and polynomials $f, g \in k[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ such that | |
| $g(u) \not = 0$ for all $u \in U$ and such that | |
| $\varphi(u) = f(u)/g(u)$ for all $u \in U$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item If $k = \bar k$ and $Z = k^n$ show that regular functions are | |
| given by polynomials. (Only do this if you haven't seen this argument | |
| before.) | |
| \item If $k$ is finite show that (a) every function $\varphi$ is regular, | |
| (b) the ring of regular functions is finite dimensional over $k$. | |
| (If you like you can take $Z = k^n$ and even $n = 1$.) | |
| \item If $k = \mathbf{R}$ give an example of a regular function on | |
| $Z = \mathbf{R}$ which is not given by a polynomial. | |
| \item If $k = \mathbf{Q}_p$ give an example of a regular function on | |
| $Z = \mathbf{Q}_p$ which is not given by a polynomial. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Sheaves} | |
| \label{section-sheaves} | |
| \noindent | |
| A morphism $f : X \to Y$ of a category $\mathcal{C}$ is an {\it monomorphism} | |
| if for every pair of morphisms $a, b : W \to X$ we have | |
| $f \circ a = f \circ b \Rightarrow a = b$. A monomorphism in the category | |
| of sets is an injective map of sets. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-mono-sheaves-sets} | |
| Carefully prove that a map of sheaves of sets is an monomorphism | |
| (in the category of sheaves of sets) if and only if the induced maps on | |
| all the stalks are injective. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \noindent | |
| A morphism $f : X \to Y$ of a category $\mathcal{C}$ is an {\it isomorphism} | |
| if there exists a morphism $g : Y \to X$ such that $f \circ g = \text{id}_Y$ | |
| and $g \circ f = \text{id}_X$. An isomorphism in the category of sets | |
| is a bijective map of sets. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-isomorphism-sheaves-sets} | |
| Carefully prove that a map of sheaves of sets is an isomorphism | |
| (in the category of sheaves of sets) if and only if the induced maps on | |
| all the stalks are bijective. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \noindent | |
| A morphism $f : X \to Y$ of a category $\mathcal{C}$ is an {\it epimorphism} | |
| if for every pair of morphisms $a, b : Y \to Z$ we have | |
| $a \circ f = b \circ f \Rightarrow a = b$. An epimorphism in the | |
| category of sets is a surjective map of sets. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-epi-sheaves-sets} | |
| Carefully prove that a map of sheaves of sets is an epimorphism | |
| (in the category of sheaves of sets) if and only if the induced maps on | |
| all the stalks are surjective. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-adjoint-push-pull} | |
| Let $f : X \to Y$ be a map of topological spaces. | |
| Prove pushforward $f_\ast$ and pullback $f^{-1}$ for sheaves of {\bf sets} | |
| form an adjoint pair of functors. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-j-shriek} | |
| Let $j : U \to X$ be an open immersion. Show that | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Pullback $j^{-1} : \Sh(X) \to \Sh(U)$ has a left adjoint | |
| $j_{!} : \Sh(U) \to \Sh(X)$ called {\it extension by the empty set}. | |
| \item Characterize the stalks of $j_{!}({\mathcal G})$ for | |
| $\mathcal{G} \in \Sh(U)$. | |
| \item Pullback $j^{-1} : \textit{Ab}(X) \to \textit{Ab}(U)$ has a left adjoint | |
| $j_{!} : \textit{Ab}(U) \to \textit{Ab}(X)$ called {\it extension by zero}. | |
| \item Characterize the stalks of $j_{!}({\mathcal G})$ for | |
| $\mathcal{G} \in \textit{Ab}(U)$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| Observe that extension by zero differs from extension by the | |
| empty set! | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-not-locally-generated-by-sections} | |
| Let $X = \mathbf{R}$ with the usual topology. | |
| Let $\mathcal{O}_X = \underline{\mathbf{Z}/2\mathbf{Z}}_X$. | |
| Let $i : Z = \{0\} \to X$ be the inclusion and let | |
| $\mathcal{O}_Z = \underline{\mathbf{Z}/2\mathbf{Z}}_Z$. | |
| Prove the following (the first three follow from the definitions but if you | |
| are not clear on the definitions you should elucidate them): | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $i_*\mathcal{O}_Z$ is a skyscraper sheaf. | |
| \item There is a canonical surjective map from | |
| $\underline{\mathbf{Z}/2\mathbf{Z}}_X \to | |
| i_*\underline{\mathbf{Z}/2\mathbf{Z}}_Z$. | |
| Denote the kernel $\mathcal{I} \subset \mathcal{O}_X$. | |
| \item $\mathcal{I}$ is an ideal sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_X$. | |
| \item The sheaf $\mathcal{I}$ on $X$ cannot be locally generated | |
| by sections (as in | |
| Modules, Definition \ref{modules-definition-locally-generated}.) | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-quotient-j-shriek-Z} | |
| Let $X$ be a topological space. | |
| Let ${\mathcal F}$ be an abelian sheaf on $X$. Show | |
| that ${\mathcal F}$ is the quotient of a (possibly very large) direct sum | |
| of sheaves all of whose terms are of the form | |
| $$ | |
| j_{!}(\underline{{\mathbf Z}}_U) | |
| $$ | |
| where $U \subset X$ is open and $\underline{{\mathbf Z}}_U$ denotes the | |
| constant sheaf with value ${\mathbf Z}$ on $U$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-direct-sum-stalk-abelian} | |
| Let $X$ be a topological space. | |
| In the category of abelian sheaves the direct sum of | |
| a family of sheaves $\{{\mathcal F}_i\}_{i\in I}$ is the sheaf associated to | |
| the presheaf $U \mapsto \oplus {\mathcal F}_i(U)$. Consequently the stalk of | |
| the direct sum at a point $x$ is the direct sum of the stalks of the | |
| ${\mathcal F}_i$ at $x$. | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-product-over-points} | |
| Let $X$ be a topological space. Suppose we are given a collection of | |
| abelian groups $A_x$ indexed by $x \in X$. Show that the rule | |
| $U \mapsto \prod_{x \in U} A_x$ with obvious restriction mappings | |
| defines a sheaf $\mathcal{G}$ of abelian groups. Show, by an example, | |
| that usually it is not the case that $\mathcal{G}_x = A_x$ for $x \in X$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-modified-product-over-points} | |
| Let $X$, $A_x$, $\mathcal{G}$ be as in | |
| Exercise \ref{exercise-product-over-points}. | |
| Let $\mathcal{B}$ be a basis for the topology of $X$, see | |
| Topology, Definition \ref{topology-definition-base}. | |
| For $U \in \mathcal{B}$ let $A_U$ be a subgroup | |
| $A_U \subset \mathcal{G}(U) = \prod_{x \in U} A_x$. Assume that for | |
| $U \subset V$ with $U, V \in \mathcal{B}$ the restriction | |
| maps $A_V$ into $A_U$. For $U \subset X$ open set | |
| $$ | |
| \mathcal{F}(U) = | |
| \left\{ | |
| (s_x)_{x \in U} | |
| \middle| | |
| \begin{matrix} | |
| \text{ for every }x\text{ in }U\text{ there exists } V \in \mathcal{B} \\ | |
| x \in V \subset U\text{ such that } (s_y)_{y \in V} \in A_V | |
| \end{matrix} | |
| \right\} | |
| $$ | |
| Show that $\mathcal{F}$ defines a sheaf of abelian groups on $X$. | |
| Show, by an example, that it is usually not the case that | |
| $\mathcal{F}(U) = A_U$ for $U \in \mathcal{B}$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-exact-but-not-a-stalk-functor} | |
| Give an example of a topological space $X$ and a functor | |
| $$ | |
| F : \Sh(X) \longrightarrow \textit{Sets} | |
| $$ | |
| which is exact (commutes with finite products and equalizers and commutes | |
| with finite coproducts and coequalizers, see Categories, Section | |
| \ref{categories-section-exact-functor}), but there is no point $x \in X$ | |
| such that $F$ is isomorphic to the stalk functor | |
| $\mathcal{F} \mapsto \mathcal{F}_x$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Schemes} | |
| \label{section-schemes} | |
| \noindent | |
| Let $LRS$ be the category of locally ringed spaces. | |
| An affine scheme is an object in $LRS$ isomorphic in $LRS$ to | |
| a pair of the form $(\Spec(A), {\mathcal O}_{\Spec(A)})$. | |
| A scheme is an | |
| object $(X, {\mathcal O}_X)$ of $LRS$ such that every point $x\in X$ | |
| has an open neighbourhood $U \subset X$ such that the pair | |
| $(U, {\mathcal O}_X|_U)$ is an affine scheme. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-one-point} | |
| Find a $1$-point locally ringed space which is not a scheme. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-two-points} | |
| Suppose that $X$ is a scheme whose underlying | |
| topological space has 2 points. Show that $X$ is an affine scheme. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-discrete-finite-set-points} | |
| Suppose that $X$ is a scheme whose underlying topological space is a | |
| finite discrete set. Show that $X$ is an affine scheme. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-three-points} | |
| Show that there exists a non-affine scheme having three points. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-quasi-compact-closed-point} | |
| Suppose that $X$ is a nonempty quasi-compact scheme. | |
| Show that $X$ has a closed point. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-open-immersion} | |
| When $(X, {\mathcal O}_X)$ is a ringed space and $U \subset X$ | |
| is an open subset then $(U, {\mathcal O}_X|_U)$ is a ringed space. Notation: | |
| ${\mathcal O}_U = {\mathcal O}_X|_U$. There is a canonical morphisms | |
| of ringed spaces | |
| $$ | |
| j : (U, {\mathcal O}_U) \longrightarrow (X, {\mathcal O}_X). | |
| $$ | |
| If $(X, {\mathcal O}_X)$ is a locally ringed space, so is | |
| $(U, {\mathcal O}_U)$ and | |
| $j$ is a morphism of locally ringed spaces. If $(X, {\mathcal O}_X)$ | |
| is a scheme | |
| so is $(U, {\mathcal O}_U)$ and $j$ is a morphism of schemes. We say | |
| that | |
| $(U, {\mathcal O}_U)$ is an {\it open subscheme} of $(X, {\mathcal O}_X)$ | |
| and that | |
| $j$ is an {\it open immersion}. More generally, any morphism | |
| $j' : (V, {\mathcal O}_V) \to (X, {\mathcal O}_X)$ that is {\it isomorphic} | |
| to a | |
| morphism $j : (U, {\mathcal O}_U) \to (X, {\mathcal O}_X)$ as above is | |
| called an | |
| open immersion. | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-open-affine-not-affine} | |
| Give an example of an affine scheme $(X, {\mathcal O}_X)$ | |
| and an open $U \subset X$ such that $(U, {\mathcal O}_X|U)$ is not an affine | |
| scheme. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-morphism-does-not-extend} | |
| Given an example of a pair of affine schemes | |
| $(X, {\mathcal O}_X)$, $(Y, {\mathcal O}_Y)$, | |
| an open subscheme $(U, {\mathcal O}_X|_U)$ | |
| of $X$ and a morphism of schemes | |
| $(U, {\mathcal O}_X|_U) \to (Y, {\mathcal O}_Y)$ | |
| that does not extend to a morphism of schemes | |
| $(X, {\mathcal O}_X) \to (Y, {\mathcal O}_Y)$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-closed-subscheme-does-not-extend} | |
| (This is pretty hard.) | |
| Given an example of a scheme $X$, and open subscheme $U \subset X$ | |
| and a closed subscheme $Z \subset U$ such that $Z$ does not extend | |
| to a closed subscheme of $X$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-not-morphism-schemes} | |
| Give an example of a scheme $X$, a field $K$, and a | |
| morphism of ringed spaces $\Spec(K) \to X$ which | |
| is NOT a morphism of schemes. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-just-kidding} | |
| Do all the exercises in \cite[Chapter II]{H}, | |
| Sections 1 and 2...\ \ Just kidding! | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-integral} | |
| A scheme $X$ is called {\it integral} if $X$ is nonempty and | |
| for every nonempty affine open $U \subset X$ the ring | |
| $\Gamma(U, \mathcal{O}_X) = \mathcal{O}_X(U)$ is a domain. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-morphism-integral-schemes-surjective-stalks-not-closed} | |
| Give an example of a morphism of {\it integral} | |
| schemes $f : X \to Y$ such that the induced maps ${\mathcal O}_{Y, f(x)} | |
| \to {\mathcal O}_{X, x}$ are surjective for all $x\in X$, but $f$ | |
| is not a closed immersion. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-fibre-product-affines-not-affine} | |
| Give an example of a fibre product $X \times_S Y$ such that $X$ and $Y$ | |
| are affine but $X \times_S Y$ is not. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-separated-base-fibre-product-affines-affine} | |
| It turns out this cannot happen with $S$ separated. Do you know why? | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-not-geometrically-integral} | |
| Give an example of a scheme | |
| $V$ which is integral 1-dimensional scheme of finite type | |
| over ${\mathbf Q}$ such that | |
| $\Spec({\mathbf C}) \times_{\Spec({\mathbf Q})} V$ | |
| is not integral. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-not-geometrically-reduced} | |
| Give an example of a scheme | |
| $V$ which is integral 1-dimensional scheme of finite type | |
| over a field $k$ such that $\Spec(k') \times_{\Spec(k)} V$ | |
| is not reduced for some finite field extension $k'/k$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-affine-dimension} | |
| If your scheme is affine then dimension is the | |
| same as the Krull dimension of the underlying ring. So you can | |
| use last semesters results to compute dimension. | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \section{Morphisms} | |
| \label{section-morphisms} | |
| \noindent | |
| An important question is, given a morphism $\pi : X \to S$, | |
| whether the morphism has a section or a rational section. | |
| Here are some example exercises. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-no-section} | |
| Consider the morphism of schemes | |
| $$ | |
| \pi : | |
| X = \Spec(\mathbf{C}[x, t, 1/xt]) | |
| \longrightarrow | |
| S = \Spec(\mathbf{C}[t]). | |
| $$ | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show there does not exist a morphism $\sigma : S \to X$ | |
| such that $\pi \circ \sigma = \text{id}_S$. | |
| \item Show there does exist a nonempty open $U \subset S$ and | |
| a morphism $\sigma : U \to X$ such that $\pi \circ \sigma = \text{id}_U$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-no-rational-section} | |
| Consider the morphism of schemes | |
| $$ | |
| \pi : | |
| X = \Spec(\mathbf{C}[x, t]/(x^2 + t)) | |
| \longrightarrow | |
| S = \Spec(\mathbf{C}[t]). | |
| $$ | |
| Show there does not exist a nonempty open $U \subset S$ and | |
| a morphism $\sigma : U \to X$ such that $\pi \circ \sigma = \text{id}_U$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-has-rational-section} | |
| Let $A, B, C \in \mathbf{C}[t]$ be nonzero polynomials. | |
| Consider the morphism of schemes | |
| $$ | |
| \pi : | |
| X = \Spec(\mathbf{C}[x, y, t]/(A + Bx^2 + Cy^2)) | |
| \longrightarrow | |
| S = \Spec(\mathbf{C}[t]). | |
| $$ | |
| Show there does exist a nonempty open $U \subset S$ and | |
| a morphism $\sigma : U \to X$ such that $\pi \circ \sigma = \text{id}_U$. | |
| (Hint: Symbolically, write $x = X/Z$, $y = Y/Z$ for some | |
| $X, Y, Z \in \mathbf{C}[t]$ of degree $\leq d$ for some $d$, | |
| and work out the condition that this solves the equation. | |
| Then show, using dimension theory, that if $d >> 0$ you can find | |
| nonzero $X, Y, Z$ solving the equation.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-tsen} | |
| Exercise \ref{exercise-has-rational-section} | |
| is a special case of ``Tsen's theorem''. | |
| Exercise \ref{exercise-no-section-curve} shows that the | |
| method is limited to low degree equations (conics when the base and | |
| fibre have dimension 1). | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-no-section-curve} | |
| Consider the morphism of schemes | |
| $$ | |
| \pi : | |
| X = \Spec(\mathbf{C}[x, y, t] | |
| /(1 + t x^3 + t^2 y^3)) | |
| \longrightarrow | |
| S = \Spec(\mathbf{C}[t]) | |
| $$ | |
| Show there does not exist a nonempty open $U \subset S$ and | |
| a morphism $\sigma : U \to X$ such that $\pi \circ \sigma = \text{id}_U$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-no-section-surface} | |
| Consider the schemes | |
| $$ | |
| X = \Spec(\mathbf{C}[\{x_i\}_{i = 1}^{8}, s, t] | |
| /(1 + s x_1^3 + s^2 x_2^3 + | |
| t x_3^3 + st x_4^3 + s^2t x_5^3 + | |
| t^2 x_6^3 + st^2 x_7^3 + s^2t^2 x_8^3)) | |
| $$ | |
| and | |
| $$ | |
| S = \Spec(\mathbf{C}[s, t]) | |
| $$ | |
| and the morphism of schemes | |
| $$ | |
| \pi : X \longrightarrow S | |
| $$ | |
| Show there does not exist a nonempty open $U \subset S$ and | |
| a morphism $\sigma : U \to X$ such that $\pi \circ \sigma = \text{id}_U$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-for-number-theorists} | |
| (For the number theorists.) Give an example of a closed subscheme | |
| $$ | |
| Z \subset \Spec\left({\mathbf Z}[x, \frac{1 }{ x(x-1)(2x-1)}]\right) | |
| $$ | |
| such that the morphism $Z \to \Spec({\mathbf Z})$ is finite | |
| and surjective. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-quasi-section} | |
| If you do not like number theory, you can try the | |
| variant where you look at | |
| $$ | |
| \Spec\left({\mathbf F}_p[t, x, \frac{1 }{ x(x-t)(tx-1)}]\right) | |
| \longrightarrow | |
| \Spec({\mathbf F}_p[t]) | |
| $$ | |
| and you try to find a closed subscheme of the top scheme | |
| which maps finite surjectively to the bottom one. (There is a | |
| theoretical reason for having a finite ground field here; although | |
| it may not be necessary in this particular case.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-interpretation-skolem-noether} | |
| The interpretation of the results of | |
| Exercise \ref{exercise-for-number-theorists} and \ref{exercise-quasi-section} | |
| is that given the morphism $X \to S$ all of whose fibres are nonempty, | |
| there exists a finite surjective morphism $S' \to S$ such that | |
| the base change $X_{S'} \to S'$ does have a section. | |
| This is not a general fact, but it holds if the base is the spectrum of a | |
| dedekind ring with finite residue fields at closed points, and | |
| the morphism $X \to S$ is flat with geometrically irreducible generic | |
| fibre. See Exercise \ref{exercise-no-quasi-section} below for an example | |
| where it doesn't work. | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-no-quasi-section} | |
| Prove there exist a $f \in \mathbf{C}[x, t]$ which is not divisible | |
| by $t - \alpha$ for any $\alpha \in \mathbf{C}$ such that | |
| there does not exist any $Z \subset \Spec(\mathbf{C}[x, t, 1/f])$ | |
| which maps finite surjectively to $\Spec(\mathbf{C}[t])$. | |
| (I think that $f(x, t) = (xt - 2)(x - t + 3)$ works. To show any candidate | |
| has the required property is not so easy I think.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-finite} | |
| Let $A \to B$ be a finite type ring map. Suppose that | |
| $\Spec(B) \to \Spec(A)$ factors through a closed | |
| immersion $\Spec(B) \to \mathbf{P}^n_A$ for some $n$. | |
| Prove that $A \to B$ is a finite ring map, i.e., that | |
| $B$ is finite as an $A$-module. | |
| Hint: if $A$ is Noetherian (please just assume this) | |
| you can argue using that $H^i(Z, \mathcal{O}_Z)$ for $i \in \mathbf{Z}$ | |
| is a finite $A$-module for every closed subscheme | |
| $Z \subset \mathbf{P}^n_A$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-projective-finite} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. | |
| Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of projective | |
| varieties such that $f^{-1}(\{y\})$ is finite for | |
| every closed point $y \in Y$. | |
| Prove that $f$ is finite as a morphism of schemes. | |
| Hints: (a) being finite is a local property, | |
| (b) try to reduce to Exercise \ref{exercise-finite}, and | |
| (c) use a closed immersion $X \to \mathbf{P}^n_k$ to get | |
| a closed immersion $X \to \mathbf{P}^n_Y$ over $Y$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Tangent Spaces} | |
| \label{section-tangent-space} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-dual-numbers} | |
| For any ring $R$ we denote $R[\epsilon]$ the ring | |
| of {\it dual numbers}. As an $R$-module it is free with | |
| basis $1$, $\epsilon$. The ring structure comes from setting | |
| $\epsilon^2 = 0$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-tangent-space-Zariski} | |
| Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. | |
| Let $x \in X$ be a point, let $s = f(x)$. | |
| Consider the solid commutative diagram | |
| $$ | |
| \xymatrix{ | |
| \Spec(\kappa(x)) \ar[r] \ar[dr] \ar@/^1pc/[rr] & | |
| \Spec(\kappa(x)[\epsilon]) \ar@{.>}[r] \ar[d]& | |
| X \ar[d] \\ | |
| & | |
| \Spec(\kappa(s)) \ar[r] & | |
| S | |
| } | |
| $$ | |
| with the curved arrow being the canonical morphism of | |
| $\Spec(\kappa(x))$ into $X$. | |
| If $\kappa(x) = \kappa(s)$ show that the set of dotted | |
| arrows which make the diagram commute are in one to one correspondence | |
| with the set of linear maps | |
| $$ | |
| \Hom_{\kappa(x)}( | |
| \frac{\mathfrak m_x}{\mathfrak m_x^2 + \mathfrak m_s\mathcal{O}_{X, x}}, | |
| \kappa(x)) | |
| $$ | |
| In other words: describe such a bijection. | |
| (This works more generally if $\kappa(x) \supset \kappa(s)$ is a | |
| separable algebraic extension.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-tangent-space} | |
| Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. | |
| Let $x \in X$. We dub the set of dotted arrows | |
| of Exercise \ref{exercise-tangent-space-Zariski} | |
| the {\it tangent space of $X$ over $S$} | |
| and we denote it $T_{X/S, x}$. An element of this | |
| space is called a {\it tangent vector} of $X/S$ at $x$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-simple-push-out} | |
| For any field $K$ prove that the diagram | |
| $$ | |
| \xymatrix{ | |
| \Spec(K) \ar[r] \ar[d] & \Spec(K[\epsilon_1]) \ar[d] \\ | |
| \Spec(K[\epsilon_2]) \ar[r] & | |
| \Spec(K[\epsilon_1, \epsilon_2]/(\epsilon_1\epsilon_2)) | |
| } | |
| $$ | |
| is a pushout diagram in the category of schemes. | |
| (Here $\epsilon_i^2 = 0$ as before.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-tangent-space-vectors-space} | |
| Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. | |
| Let $x \in X$. Define addition of tangent vectors, | |
| using Exercise \ref{exercise-simple-push-out} | |
| and a suitable morphism | |
| $$ | |
| \Spec(K[\epsilon]) | |
| \longrightarrow | |
| \Spec(K[\epsilon_1, \epsilon_2]/(\epsilon_1\epsilon_2)). | |
| $$ | |
| Similarly, define scalar multiplication of tangent vectors (this is easier). | |
| Show that $T_{X/S, x}$ becomes a $\kappa(x)$-vector space with your | |
| constructions. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-compute-TS} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Consider | |
| the structure morphism $f : X = \mathbf{A}^1_k \to \Spec(k) = S$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Let $x \in X$ be a closed point. What is the dimension of | |
| $T_{X/S, x}$? | |
| \item Let $\eta \in X$ be the generic point. What is the dimension | |
| of $T_{X/S, \eta}$? | |
| \item Consider now $X$ as a scheme over $\Spec(\mathbf{Z})$. | |
| What are the dimensions of $T_{X/\mathbf{Z}, x}$ and | |
| $T_{X/\mathbf{Z}, \eta}$? | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-tangent-space-relative} | |
| Exercise \ref{exercise-compute-TS} explains why it is necessary | |
| to consider the tangent space of $X$ over $S$ to get a good notion. | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-compute-TS-field} | |
| Consider the morphism of schemes | |
| $$ | |
| f : X = \Spec(\mathbf{F}_p(t)) | |
| \longrightarrow | |
| \Spec(\mathbf{F}_p(t^p)) = S | |
| $$ | |
| Compute the tangent space of $X/S$ at the unique point of $X$. | |
| Isn't that weird? What do you think happens if you take the morphism | |
| of schemes corresponding to $\mathbf{F}_p[t^p] \to \mathbf{F}_p[t]$? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-compute-TS-cusp} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. | |
| Compute the tangent space of $X/k$ at the point $x = (0, 0)$ | |
| where $X = \Spec(k[x, y]/(x^2 - y^3))$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-map-tangent-spaces} | |
| Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes over $S$. | |
| Let $x \in X$ be a point. Set $y = f(x)$. | |
| Assume that the natural map $\kappa(y) \to \kappa(x)$ is | |
| bijective. Show, using the definition, | |
| that $f$ induces a natural linear map | |
| $$ | |
| \text{d}f : T_{X/S, x} \longrightarrow T_{Y/S, y}. | |
| $$ | |
| Match it with what happens on local rings via | |
| Exercise \ref{exercise-tangent-space-Zariski} in case $\kappa(x) = \kappa(s)$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-Jacobian} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. | |
| Let | |
| \begin{eqnarray*} | |
| f : \mathbf{A}_k^n & \longrightarrow & \mathbf{A}^m_k \\ | |
| (x_1, \ldots, x_n) & \longmapsto & (f_1(x_i), \ldots, f_m(x_i)) | |
| \end{eqnarray*} | |
| be a morphism of schemes over $k$. This is given by | |
| $m$ polynomials $f_1, \ldots, f_m$ in $n$ variables. | |
| Consider the matrix | |
| $$ | |
| A = \left( \frac{\partial f_j}{\partial x_i} \right) | |
| $$ | |
| Let $x \in \mathbf{A}^n_k$ be a closed point. | |
| Set $y = f(x)$. Show that the map on tangent spaces | |
| $T_{\mathbf{A}^n_k/k, x} \to T_{\mathbf{A}^m_k/k, y}$ | |
| is given by the value of the matrix $A$ at the point $x$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Quasi-coherent Sheaves} | |
| \label{section-quasi-coherent} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-quasi-coherent} | |
| Let $X$ be a scheme. | |
| A sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules is {\it quasi-coherent} | |
| if for every affine open $\Spec(R) = U \subset X$ the restriction | |
| $\mathcal{F}|_U$ is of the form $\widetilde M$ for some $R$-module | |
| $M$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \noindent | |
| It is enough to check this conditions on the members of an | |
| affine open covering of $X$. | |
| See Schemes, Section \ref{schemes-section-quasi-coherent} | |
| for more results. | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-specialization} | |
| Let $X$ be a topological space. Let $x, x' \in X$. | |
| We say $x$ is a {\it specialization} of $x'$ | |
| if and only if $x \in \overline{\{x'\}}$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-quasi-coherent-specialization-points} | |
| Let $X$ be a scheme. Let $x, x' \in X$. Let $\mathcal{F}$ be | |
| a quasi-coherent sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules. | |
| Suppose that (a) $x$ is a specialization of $x'$ and (b) | |
| $\mathcal{F}_{x'} \not = 0$. Show that $\mathcal{F}_x \not = 0$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-O-module-specialization-points} | |
| Find an example of a scheme $X$, points $x, x' \in X$, | |
| a sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules | |
| $\mathcal{F}$ such that (a) $x$ is a specialization of $x'$ and (b) | |
| $\mathcal{F}_{x'} \not = 0$ and $\mathcal{F}_x = 0$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-Noetherian-scheme} | |
| A scheme $X$ is called {\it locally Noetherian} if and only if | |
| for every point $x \in X$ there exists an affine open | |
| $\Spec(R) = U \subset X$ such that $R$ is Noetherian. | |
| A scheme is {\it Noetherian} if it is locally Noetherian and quasi-compact. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \noindent | |
| If $X$ is locally Noetherian then any affine open of $X$ | |
| is the spectrum of a Noetherian ring, see | |
| Properties, Lemma \ref{properties-lemma-locally-Noetherian}. | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-coherent} | |
| Let $X$ be a locally Noetherian scheme. | |
| Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a quasi-coherent sheaf of | |
| $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules. We say $\mathcal{F}$ is {\it coherent} | |
| if for every point $x \in X$ there exists an affine open | |
| $\Spec(R) = U \subset X$ such that $\mathcal{F}|_U$ | |
| is isomorphic to $\widetilde M$ for some finite $R$-module $M$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-extend-quasi-coherent} | |
| Let $X = \Spec(R)$ be an affine scheme. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Let $f \in R$. Let $\mathcal{G}$ be a | |
| quasi-coherent sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_{D(f)}$-modules | |
| on the open subscheme $D(f)$. | |
| Show that $\mathcal{G} = \mathcal{F}|_{D(f)}$ for some | |
| quasi-coherent sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules | |
| $\mathcal{F}$. | |
| \item Let $I \subset R$ be an ideal. | |
| Let $i : Z \to X$ be the closed subscheme of $X$ corresponding | |
| to $I$. Let $\mathcal{G}$ be a | |
| quasi-coherent sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_Z$-modules | |
| on the closed subscheme $Z$. | |
| Show that $\mathcal{G} = i^*\mathcal{F}$ for some | |
| quasi-coherent sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules $\mathcal{F}$. | |
| (Why is this silly?) | |
| \item Assume that $R$ is Noetherian. | |
| Let $f \in R$. Let $\mathcal{G}$ be a | |
| coherent sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_{D(f)}$-modules | |
| on the open subscheme $D(f)$. | |
| Show that $\mathcal{G} = \mathcal{F}|_{D(f)}$ for some | |
| coherent sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules $\mathcal{F}$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-extend-off-open} | |
| If $U \to X$ is a quasi-compact immersion then any | |
| quasi-coherent sheaf on $U$ is the restriction of a | |
| quasi-coherent sheaf on $X$. | |
| If $X$ is a Noetherian scheme, and $U \subset X$ is open, | |
| then any coherent sheaf on $U$ is the restriction of a | |
| coherent sheaf on $X$. | |
| Of course the exercise above is easier, and shouldn't use these general facts. | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \section{Proj and projective schemes} | |
| \label{section-proj} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-graded-ring-specified-result} | |
| Give examples of graded rings $S$ such that | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $\text{Proj}(S)$ is affine and nonempty, and | |
| \item $\text{Proj}(S)$ is integral, nonempty but not isomorphic | |
| to ${\mathbf P}^n_A$ for any $n\geq 0$, any ring $A$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-nonconstant-morphism-proj} | |
| Give an example of a nonconstant morphism | |
| of schemes ${\mathbf P}^1_{\mathbf C} \to {\mathbf P}^5_{\mathbf C}$ over | |
| $\Spec({\mathbf C})$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-isomorphism-P1-conic} | |
| Give an example of an isomorphism of schemes | |
| $$ | |
| {\mathbf P}^1_{\mathbf C} \to | |
| \text{Proj}({\mathbf C}[X_0, X_1, X_2]/(X_0^2 + X_1^2 + X_2^2)) | |
| $$ | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-family-special-fibre-different} | |
| Give an example of a morphism of schemes | |
| $f : X \to {\mathbf A}^1_{\mathbf C} = \Spec({\mathbf C}[T])$ | |
| such that the (scheme theoretic) fibre $X_t$ of $f$ over | |
| $t \in {\mathbf A}^1_{\mathbf C}$ is | |
| (a) isomorphic to ${\mathbf P}^1_{\mathbf C}$ when $t$ | |
| is a closed point not equal to $0$, and | |
| (b) not isomorphic to ${\mathbf P}^1_{\mathbf C}$ when $t = 0$. | |
| We will call $X_0$ the {\it special fibre} of the morphism. | |
| This can be done in many, many ways. Try to give examples that | |
| satisfy (each of) the following additional restraints (unless | |
| it isn't possible): | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Can you do it with special fibre projective? | |
| \item Can you do it with special fibre irreducible and projective? | |
| \item Can you do it with special fibre integral and projective? | |
| \item Can you do it with special fibre smooth and projective? | |
| \item Can you do it with $f$ a flat morphism? | |
| This just means that for every affine open $\Spec(A) \subset X$ the | |
| induced ring map $\mathbf{C}[t] \to A$ is flat, which in this case means | |
| that any nonzero polynomial in $t$ is a nonzerodivisor on $A$. | |
| \item Can you do it with $f$ a flat and projective morphism? | |
| \item Can you do it with $f$ flat, projective and special fibre reduced? | |
| \item Can you do it with $f$ flat, projective and special fibre irreducible? | |
| \item Can you do it with $f$ flat, projective and special fibre integral? | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| What do you think happens when you replace | |
| ${\mathbf P}^1_{\mathbf C}$ with another variety over ${\mathbf C}$? | |
| (This can get very hard depending on which of the variants above you | |
| ask for.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-affine-onto-projective-space} | |
| Let $n \geq 1$ be any positive integer. | |
| Give an example of a surjective morphism | |
| $X \to {\mathbf P}^n_{\mathbf C}$ with $X$ affine. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-morphism-proj} | |
| Maps of $\text{Proj}$. Let $R$ and $S$ be graded rings. | |
| Suppose we have a ring map | |
| $$ | |
| \psi : R \to S | |
| $$ | |
| and an integer $e \geq 1$ such that $\psi(R_d) \subset S_{de}$ | |
| for all $d \geq 0$. (By our conventions this is not a homomorphism | |
| of graded rings, unless $e = 1$.) | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item For which elements $\mathfrak p \in \text{Proj}(S)$ is | |
| there a well-defined corresponding point in $\text{Proj}(R)$? In other words, | |
| find a suitable open $U \subset \text{Proj}(S)$ such that $\psi$ defines | |
| a continuous map $r_\psi : U \to \text{Proj}(R)$. | |
| \item Give an example where $U \not = \text{Proj}(S)$. | |
| \item Give an example where $U = \text{Proj}(S)$. | |
| \item (Do not write this down.) Convince yourself that | |
| the continuous map $U \to \text{Proj}(R)$ comes canonically with | |
| a map on sheaves so that $r_\psi$ is a morphism of schemes: | |
| $$ | |
| \text{Proj}(S) \supset U \longrightarrow \text{Proj}(R). | |
| $$ | |
| \item What can you say about this map if | |
| $R = \bigoplus_{d \geq 0} S_{de}$ (as a graded ring with | |
| $S_e$, $S_{2e}$, etc in degree $1$, $2$, etc) and $\psi$ | |
| is the inclusion mapping? | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \noindent | |
| {\bf Notation.} Let $R$ be a graded ring as above and | |
| let $n \geq 0$ be an integer. Let $X = \text{Proj}(R)$. Then there is a unique | |
| quasi-coherent ${\mathcal O}_X$-module ${\mathcal O}_X(n)$ on $X$ such that | |
| for every homogeneous element $f \in R$ of positive degree we have | |
| ${\mathcal O}_X |_{D_{+}(f)}$ is the quasi-coherent sheaf associated to the | |
| $R_{(f)} = (R_f)_0$-module $(R_f)_n$ ($ = $elements homogeneous of degree | |
| $n$ in $R_f = R[1/f]$). See \cite[page 116+]{H}. Note that there are | |
| natural maps | |
| $$ | |
| {\mathcal O}_X(n_1) \otimes_{{\mathcal O}_X} {\mathcal O}_X(n_2) | |
| \longrightarrow | |
| {\mathcal O}_X(n_1 + n_2) | |
| $$ | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-pathologies-proj} | |
| Pathologies in $\text{Proj}$. | |
| Give examples of $R$ as above such that | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item ${\mathcal O}_X(1)$ is not an invertible ${\mathcal O}_X$-module. | |
| \item ${\mathcal O}_X(1)$ is invertible, but the | |
| natural map ${\mathcal O}_X(1) \otimes_{{\mathcal O}_X} {\mathcal O}_X(1) \to | |
| {\mathcal O}_X(2)$ is NOT an isomorphism. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-finitely-many-points-in-affine} | |
| Let $S$ be a graded ring. | |
| Let $X = \text{Proj}(S)$. | |
| Show that any finite set of points of $X$ is contained in a standard | |
| affine open. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-prepare-glueing} | |
| Let $S$ be a graded ring. | |
| Let $X = \text{Proj}(S)$. | |
| Let $Z, Z' \subset X$ be two closed subschemes. | |
| Let $\varphi : Z \to Z'$ be an isomorphism. | |
| Assume $Z \cap Z' = \emptyset$. | |
| Show that for any $z \in Z$ there exists an affine | |
| open $U \subset X$ such that $z \in U$, $\varphi(z) \in U$ and | |
| $\varphi(Z \cap U) = Z' \cap U$. | |
| (Hint: Use Exercise \ref{exercise-finitely-many-points-in-affine} | |
| and something akin to | |
| Schemes, Lemma \ref{schemes-lemma-standard-open-two-affines}.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Morphisms from the projective line} | |
| \label{section-from-P1} | |
| \noindent | |
| In this section we study morphisms from $\mathbf{P}^1$ | |
| to projective schemes. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-from-generic-point} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $k[t] \subset k(t)$ be the | |
| inclusion of the polynomial ring into its fraction field. | |
| Let $X$ be a finite type scheme over $k$. | |
| Show that for any morphism | |
| $$ | |
| \varphi : \Spec(k(t)) \longrightarrow X | |
| $$ | |
| over $k$, there exist a nonzero $f \in k[t]$ and a morphism | |
| $\psi : \Spec(k[t, 1/f]) \to X$ over $k$ | |
| such that $\varphi$ is the composition | |
| $$ | |
| \Spec(k(t)) \longrightarrow \Spec(k[t, 1/f]) \longrightarrow X | |
| $$ | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-from-generic-point-Pn} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $k[t] \subset k(t)$ be the | |
| inclusion of the polynomial ring into its fraction field. | |
| Show that for any morphism | |
| $$ | |
| \varphi : \Spec(k(t)) \longrightarrow \mathbf{P}^n_k | |
| $$ | |
| over $k$, there exists a morphism $\psi : \Spec(k[t]) \to \mathbf{P}^n_k$ | |
| over $k$ such that $\varphi$ is the composition | |
| $$ | |
| \Spec(k(t)) \longrightarrow \Spec(k[t]) \longrightarrow \mathbf{P}^n_k | |
| $$ | |
| Hint: the image of $\varphi$ is in a standard open $D_+(T_i)$ | |
| for some $i$; then show that you can ``clear denominators''. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-from-generic-point-projective} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $k[t] \subset k(t)$ be the | |
| inclusion of the polynomial ring into its fraction field. | |
| Let $X$ be a projective scheme over $k$. | |
| Show that for any morphism | |
| $$ | |
| \varphi : \Spec(k(t)) \longrightarrow X | |
| $$ | |
| over $k$, there exists a morphism $\psi : \Spec(k[t]) \to X$ | |
| over $k$ such that $\varphi$ is the composition | |
| $$ | |
| \Spec(k(t)) \longrightarrow \Spec(k[t]) \longrightarrow X | |
| $$ | |
| Hint: use Exercise \ref{exercise-from-generic-point-Pn}. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-from-generic-point-P1-to-projective} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $X$ be a projective scheme over $k$. | |
| Let $K$ be the function field of $\mathbf{P}^1_k$ (see hint below). | |
| Show that for any morphism | |
| $$ | |
| \varphi : \Spec(K) \longrightarrow X | |
| $$ | |
| over $k$, there exists a morphism $\psi : \mathbf{P}^1_k \to X$ | |
| over $k$ such that $\varphi$ is the composition | |
| $$ | |
| \Spec(k(t)) \longrightarrow \mathbf{P}^1_k \longrightarrow X | |
| $$ | |
| Hint: use Exercise \ref{exercise-from-generic-point-projective} | |
| for each of the two pieces of the affine open covering | |
| $\mathbf{P}^1_k = D_+(T_0) \cup D_+(T_1)$, use that | |
| $D_+(T_0)$ is the spectrum of a polynomial ring and that | |
| $K$ is the fraction field of this polynomial ring. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Morphisms from surfaces to curves} | |
| \label{section-from-surfaces-to-curves} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-points-projective-space} | |
| Let $R$ be a ring. | |
| Let $R \to k$ be a map from $R$ to a field. | |
| Let $n \geq 0$. | |
| Show that | |
| $$ | |
| \Mor_{\Spec(R)}(\Spec(k), \mathbf{P}^n_R) | |
| = | |
| (k^{n + 1} \setminus \{0\})/k^* | |
| $$ | |
| where $k^*$ acts via scalar multiplication on $k^{n + 1}$. | |
| From now on we denote $(x_0 : \ldots : x_n)$ the | |
| morphism $\Spec(k) \to \mathbf{P}^n_k$ corresponding | |
| to the equivalence class of the element | |
| $(x_0, \ldots, x_n) \in k^{n + 1} \setminus \{0\}$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-curve-projective-plane} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $Z \subset \mathbf{P}^2_k$ be an | |
| irreducible and reduced closed subscheme. | |
| Show that either (a) $Z$ is a closed point, or (b) there exists | |
| an homogeneous irreducible $F \in k[X_0, X_1, X_2]$ of degree $> 0$ | |
| such that $Z = V_{+}(F)$, or (c) $Z = \mathbf{P}^2_k$. | |
| (Hint: Look on a standard affine open.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-bezout} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $Z_1, Z_2 \subset \mathbf{P}^2_k$ be | |
| irreducible closed subschemes of the form $V_{+}(F)$ | |
| for some homogeneous irreducible $F_i \in k[X_0, X_1, X_2]$ of degree $> 0$. | |
| Show that $Z_1 \cap Z_2$ is not empty. | |
| (Hint: Use dimension theory to estimate the dimension of | |
| the local ring of $k[X_0, X_1, X_2]/(F_1, F_2)$ at $0$.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-no-nonconstant-morphism-proj} | |
| Show there does not exist a nonconstant morphism of schemes | |
| $\mathbf{P}^2_{\mathbf{C}} \to \mathbf{P}^1_{\mathbf{C}}$ | |
| over $\Spec(\mathbf{C})$. Here a {\it constant morphism} is | |
| one whose image is a single point. | |
| (Hint: If the morphism is not constant consider the fibres over | |
| $0$ and $\infty$ and argue that they have to meet to get a contradiction.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-nonconstant-morphism} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. | |
| Suppose that $X \subset \mathbf{P}^3_k$ is a closed subscheme | |
| given by a single homogeneous equation $F \in k[X_0, X_1, X_2, X_3]$. | |
| In other words, | |
| $$ | |
| X = \text{Proj}(k[X_0, X_1, X_2, X_3]/(F)) \subset \mathbf{P}^3_k | |
| $$ | |
| as explained in the course. Assume that | |
| $$ | |
| F = X_0 G + X_1 H | |
| $$ | |
| for some homogeneous polynomials $G, H \in k[X_0, X_1, X_2, X_3]$ | |
| of positive degree. Show that if $X_0, X_1, G, H$ have no common zeros | |
| then there exists a nonconstant morphism | |
| $$ | |
| X \longrightarrow \mathbf{P}^1_k | |
| $$ | |
| of schemes over $\Spec(k)$ | |
| which on field points (see Exercise \ref{exercise-points-projective-space}) | |
| looks like $(x_0 : x_1 : x_2 : x_3) \mapsto (x_0 : x_1)$ whenever | |
| $x_0$ or $x_1$ is not zero. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Invertible sheaves} | |
| \label{section-invertible-sheaves} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-invertible-sheaf} | |
| Let $X$ be a locally ringed space. | |
| An {\it invertible ${\mathcal O}_X$-module} on $X$ | |
| is a sheaf of ${\mathcal O}_X$-modules ${\mathcal L}$ such that every point | |
| has an open neighbourhood $U \subset X$ such that ${\mathcal L}|_U$ | |
| is isomorphic to ${\mathcal O}_U$ as ${\mathcal O}_U$-module. | |
| We say that ${\mathcal L}$ is trivial if it is isomorphic to | |
| ${\mathcal O}_X$ as a ${\mathcal O}_X$-module. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-general-facts-invertible} | |
| General facts. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that an invertible ${\mathcal O}_X$-module on | |
| a scheme $X$ is quasi-coherent. | |
| \item Suppose $X\to Y$ is a morphism of locally ringed spaces, | |
| and ${\mathcal L}$ an invertible ${\mathcal O}_Y$-module. | |
| Show that $f^\ast {\mathcal L}$ is an invertible ${\mathcal O}_X$ module. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-invertible-algebra} | |
| Algebra. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that an invertible ${\mathcal O}_X$-module on | |
| an affine scheme $\Spec(A)$ corresponds to an $A$-module $M$ which is | |
| (i) finite, (ii) projective, (iii) locally free of rank 1, | |
| and hence (iv) flat, and (v) finitely presented. (Feel free to | |
| quote things from last semesters course; or from algebra books.) | |
| \item Suppose that $A$ is a domain and that $M$ is | |
| a module as in (a). Show that $M$ is isomorphic as an $A$-module | |
| to an ideal $I \subset A$ such that $IA_{\mathfrak p}$ is principal for | |
| every prime ${\mathfrak p}$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-invertible-module} | |
| Let $R$ be a ring. An {\it invertible module $M$} is an $R$-module | |
| $M$ such that $\widetilde M$ is an invertible sheaf on the | |
| spectrum of $R$. We say $M$ is {\it trivial} if $M \cong R$ as | |
| an $R$-module. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \noindent | |
| In other words, $M$ is invertible if and only if | |
| it satisfies all of the following conditions: | |
| it is flat, of finite presentation, projective, and | |
| locally free of rank 1. (Of course it suffices for it | |
| to be locally free of rank 1). | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-simple-examples-invertible} | |
| Simple examples. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item | |
| \label{item-affine-line} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $A = k[x]$. | |
| Show that $X = \Spec(A)$ has only trivial invertible | |
| ${\mathcal O}_X$-modules. In other words, show that every | |
| invertible $A$-module is free of rank 1. | |
| \item | |
| \label{item-affine-line-with-0-and-1-identified} | |
| Let $A$ be the ring | |
| $$ | |
| A = \{ f\in k[x] \mid f(0) = f(1) \}. | |
| $$ | |
| Show there exists a nontrivial invertible $A$-module, unless | |
| $k = {\mathbf F}_2$. (Hint: Think about $\Spec(A)$ as identifying | |
| $0$ and $1$ in ${\mathbf A}^1_k = \Spec(k[x])$.) | |
| \item | |
| \label{item-affine-line-with-cusp} | |
| Same question as in (\ref{item-affine-line-with-0-and-1-identified}) | |
| for the ring $A = k[x^2, x^3] \subset k[x]$ | |
| (except now $k = {\mathbf F}_2$ works as well). | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-higher-dimension-invertible} | |
| Higher dimensions. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Prove that every invertible sheaf on two dimensional | |
| affine space is trivial. More precisely, let | |
| ${\mathbf A}^2_k = \Spec(k[x, y])$ where $k$ is a field. | |
| Show that every invertible sheaf on ${\mathbf A}^2_k$ is trivial. | |
| (Hint: One way to do this is to consider the corresponding | |
| module $M$, to look at $M \otimes_{k[x, y]} k(x)[y]$, and | |
| then use | |
| Exercise \ref{exercise-simple-examples-invertible} (\ref{item-affine-line}) | |
| to find a generator for this; then you still have to think. | |
| Another way to is to use | |
| Exercise \ref{exercise-invertible-algebra} | |
| and use what we know about ideals of the | |
| polynomial ring: primes of height one are generated by an irreducible | |
| polynomial; then you still have to think.) | |
| \item Prove that every invertible sheaf on any open | |
| subscheme of two dimensional affine space is trivial. More precisely, let | |
| $U \subset {\mathbf A}^2_k$ be an open subscheme where $k$ is a field. | |
| Show that every invertible sheaf on $U$ is trivial. Hint: Show that every | |
| invertible sheaf on $U$ extends to one on ${\mathbf A}^2_k$. Not easy; | |
| but you can find it in \cite{H}. | |
| \item Find an example of a nontrivial | |
| invertible sheaf on a punctured cone over a field. More | |
| precisely, let $k$ be a field and let $C = \Spec(k[x, y, z]/(xy-z^2))$. | |
| Let $U = C \setminus \{ (x, y, z) \}$. Find a nontrivial | |
| invertible sheaf on $U$. Hint: It may be easier to compute the | |
| group of isomorphism classes of invertible sheaves on $U$ than to | |
| just find one. Note that $U$ is covered by the opens | |
| $\Spec(k[x, y, z, 1/x]/(xy-z^2))$ and | |
| $\Spec(k[x, y, z, 1/y]/(xy-z^2))$ | |
| which are ``easy'' to deal with. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-picard-group} | |
| Let $X$ be a locally ringed space. | |
| The {\it Picard group of $X$} is the set $\Pic(X)$ | |
| of isomorphism classes of invertible $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules | |
| with addition given by tensor product. | |
| See Modules, Definition \ref{modules-definition-pic}. | |
| For a ring $R$ we set $\Pic(R) = \Pic(\Spec(R))$. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-traverso} | |
| Let $R$ be a ring. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that if $R$ is a Noetherian normal domain, then | |
| $\Pic(R) = \Pic(R[t])$. [Hint: There is a map | |
| $R[t] \to R$, $t \mapsto 0$ which is a left inverse to the map | |
| $R \to R[t]$. Hence it suffices to show that any invertible | |
| $R[t]$-module $M$ such that $M/tM \cong R$ is free of rank $1$. | |
| Let $K$ be the fraction field of $R$. | |
| Pick a trivialization $K[t] \to M \otimes_{R[t]} K[t]$ which is possible by | |
| Exercise \ref{exercise-simple-examples-invertible} (\ref{item-affine-line}). | |
| Adjust it so it agrees with the trivialization | |
| of $M/tM$ above. Show that it is in fact a trivialization of | |
| $M$ over $R[t]$ (this is where normality comes in).] | |
| \item Let $k$ be a field. Show that | |
| $\Pic(k[x^2, x^3, t]) \not = \Pic(k[x^2, x^3])$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{{\v C}ech Cohomology} | |
| \label{section-cech-cohomology} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-cech-cohomology} | |
| {\v C}ech cohomology. Here $k$ is a field. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Let $X$ be a scheme with an open covering | |
| ${\mathcal U} : X = U_1 \cup U_2$, with $U_1 = \Spec(k[x])$, | |
| $U_2 = \Spec(k[y])$ | |
| with $U_1 \cap U_2 = \Spec(k[z, 1/z])$ and with open immersions | |
| $U_1 \cap U_2 \to U_1$ resp.\ $U_1 \cap U_2 \to U_2$ determined | |
| by $x \mapsto z$ resp.\ $y \mapsto z$ (and I really mean this). | |
| (We've seen in the lectures that such an $X$ exists; it is the affine | |
| line with zero doubled.) Compute ${\check H}^1({\mathcal U}, {\mathcal | |
| O})$; | |
| eg.\ give a basis for it as a $k$-vectorspace. | |
| \item For each element in | |
| ${\check H}^1({\mathcal U}, {\mathcal O})$ | |
| construct an exact sequence of sheaves of ${\mathcal O}_X$-modules | |
| $$ | |
| 0 \to {\mathcal O}_X \to E \to {\mathcal O}_X \to 0 | |
| $$ | |
| such that the boundary $\delta(1) \in {\check H}^1({\mathcal U}, | |
| {\mathcal O})$ | |
| equals the given element. (Part of the problem is to make sense of this. | |
| See also below. | |
| It is also OK to show abstractly such a thing has to exist.) | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-delta} | |
| (Definition of delta.) Suppose that | |
| $$ | |
| 0 \to {\mathcal F}_1 \to {\mathcal F}_2 \to {\mathcal F}_3 \to 0 | |
| $$ | |
| is a short exact sequence of abelian sheaves on any topological space $X$. | |
| The boundary map | |
| $\delta : H^0(X, {\mathcal F}_3) \to {\check H}^1(X, {\mathcal F}_1)$ | |
| is defined as follows. Take an element $\tau \in H^0(X, {\mathcal F}_3)$. | |
| Choose an open covering ${\mathcal U} : X = \bigcup_{i\in I} U_i$ such | |
| that for each $i$ there exists a section $\tilde \tau_i \in {\mathcal F}_2$ | |
| lifting the restriction of $\tau$ to $U_i$. Then consider the assignment | |
| $$ | |
| (i_0, i_1) \longmapsto | |
| \tilde \tau_{i_0}|_{U_{i_0i_1}} - \tilde \tau_{i_1}|_{U_{i_0i_1}}. | |
| $$ | |
| This is clearly a 1-coboundary in the {\v C}ech complex | |
| ${\check C}^\ast({\mathcal U}, {\mathcal F}_2)$. But we observe that | |
| (thinking of ${\mathcal F}_1$ as a subsheaf of ${\mathcal F}_2$) the RHS | |
| always is a section of ${\mathcal F}_1$ over $U_{i_0i_1}$. Hence we | |
| see that the assignment defines a 1-cochain in the complex | |
| ${\check C}^\ast({\mathcal U}, {\mathcal F}_2)$. The cohomology | |
| class of this 1-cochain is by definition {\it $\delta(\tau)$}. | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \section{Cohomology} | |
| \label{section-cohomology} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-cohomology-not-zero} | |
| Let $X = \mathbf{R}$ with the usual Euclidean topology. | |
| Using only formal properties of cohomology (functoriality | |
| and the long exact cohomology sequence) show that there | |
| exists a sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $X$ with nonzero $H^1(X, \mathcal{F})$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-mayer-vietoris} | |
| Let $X = U \cup V$ be a topological space written as the | |
| union of two opens. Then we have a long exact | |
| Mayer-Vietoris sequence | |
| $$ | |
| 0 \to | |
| H^0(X, \mathcal{F}) \to | |
| H^0(U, \mathcal{F}) \oplus H^0(V, \mathcal{F}) \to | |
| H^0(U \cap V, \mathcal{F}) \to | |
| H^1(X, \mathcal{F}) \to \ldots | |
| $$ | |
| What property of injective sheaves is essential for the construction | |
| of the Mayer-Vietoris long exact sequence? Why does it hold? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-cohomology-two-point-space} | |
| Let $X$ be a topological space. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that $H^i(X, \mathcal{F})$ is zero for $i > 0$ | |
| if $X$ has $2$ or fewer points. | |
| \item What if $X$ has $3$ points? | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-cohomology-spec-local-ring} | |
| Let $X$ be the spectrum of a local ring. Show that | |
| $H^i(X, \mathcal{F})$ is zero for $i > 0$ and any | |
| sheaf of abelian groups $\mathcal{F}$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-affine-morphism} | |
| Let $f : X \to Y$ be an affine morphism of schemes. | |
| Prove that $H^i(X, \mathcal{F}) = H^i(Y, f_*\mathcal{F})$ | |
| for any quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module $\mathcal{F}$. | |
| Feel free to impose some further conditions on $X$ and $Y$ | |
| and use the agreement of {\v C}ech cohomology with cohomology | |
| for quasi-coherent sheaves and affine open coverings of separated schemes. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-affine-morphism-to-Pn} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring. Let $\mathbf{P}^n_A = \text{Proj}(A[T_0, \ldots, T_n])$ | |
| be projective space over $A$. Let | |
| $\mathbf{A}^{n + 1}_A = \Spec(A[T_0, \ldots, T_n])$ and let | |
| $$ | |
| U = \bigcup\nolimits_{i = 0, \ldots, n} D(T_i) \subset \mathbf{A}^{n + 1}_A | |
| $$ | |
| be the complement of the image of the closed immersion | |
| $0 : \Spec(A) \to \mathbf{A}^{n + 1}_A$. | |
| Construct an affine surjective morphism | |
| $$ | |
| f : U \longrightarrow \mathbf{P}^n_A | |
| $$ | |
| and prove that $f_*\mathcal{O}_U = | |
| \bigoplus_{d \in \mathbf{Z}} \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^n_A}(d)$. | |
| More generally, show that for a graded $A[T_0, \ldots, T_n]$-module $M$ | |
| one has | |
| $$ | |
| f_*(\widetilde{M}|_U) = | |
| \bigoplus\nolimits_{d \in \mathbf{Z}} \widetilde{M(d)} | |
| $$ | |
| where on the left hand side we have the quasi-coherent sheaf | |
| $\widetilde{M}$ associated to $M$ on $\mathbf{A}^{n + 1}_A$ | |
| and on the right we have the quasi-coherent sheaves | |
| $\widetilde{M(d)}$ associated to the graded module $M(d)$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-compute-Pn} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring and let $\mathbf{P}^n_A = \text{Proj}(A[T_0, \ldots, T_n])$ | |
| be projective space over $A$. | |
| Carefully compute the cohomology of the Serre twists | |
| $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^n_A}(d)$ of the structure | |
| sheaf on $\mathbf{P}^n_A$. Feel free to use {\v C}ech cohomology | |
| and the agreement of {\v C}ech cohomology with cohomology | |
| for quasi-coherent sheaves and affine open coverings of separated schemes. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-cohomology-hypersurface} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring and let $\mathbf{P}^n_A = \text{Proj}(A[T_0, \ldots, T_n])$ | |
| be projective space over $A$. Let | |
| $F \in A[T_0, \ldots, T_n]$ be homogeneous of degree $d$. | |
| Let $X \subset \mathbf{P}^n_A$ be the closed subscheme | |
| corresponding to the graded ideal $(F)$ of $A[T_0, \ldots, T_n]$. | |
| What can you say about $H^i(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-characterize-finite-product-fields} | |
| Let $R$ be a ring such that for any left exact functor | |
| $F : \text{Mod}_R \to \textit{Ab}$ we have | |
| $R^iF = 0$ for $i > 0$. Show that $R$ is a finite product | |
| of fields. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{More cohomology} | |
| \label{section-more-cohomology} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-cohomology-coordinate-axes} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $X \subset \mathbf{P}^n_k$ | |
| be the ``coordinate cross''. Namely, let $X$ be | |
| defined by the homogeneous equations | |
| $$ | |
| T_i T_j = 0\text{ for }i > j > 0 | |
| $$ | |
| where as usual we write $\mathbf{P}^n_k = \text{Proj}(k[T_0, \ldots, T_n])$. | |
| In other words, $X$ is the closed subscheme corresponding to the quotient | |
| $k[T_0, \ldots, T_n]/(T_iT_j; i > j > 0)$ of the polynomial ring. | |
| Compute $H^i(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$ for all $i$. Hint: use {\v C}ech cohomology. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-compute-cohomology-punctured} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring. Let $I = (f_1, \ldots, f_t)$ | |
| be a finitely generated ideal of $A$. | |
| Let $U \subset \Spec(A)$ be the complement of $V(I)$. | |
| For any $A$-module $M$ write down a complex | |
| of $A$-modules (in terms of $A$, $f_1, \ldots, f_t$, $M$) | |
| whose cohomology groups give $H^n(U, \widetilde{M})$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-compute-cohomology-affine-space-punctured} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $U \subset \mathbf{A}^d_k$ be the | |
| complement of the closed point $0$ of $\mathbf{A}^d_k$. | |
| Compute $H^n(U, \mathcal{O}_U)$ for all $n$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-find-curve-genus-one-hundred} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Find explicitly a scheme $X$ projective over $k$ | |
| of dimension $1$ with $H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_X) = k$ and | |
| $\dim_k H^1(X, \mathcal{O}_X) = 100$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-degree-2-cover} | |
| Let $f : X \to Y$ be a finite locally free morphism of degree $2$. | |
| Assume that $X$ and $Y$ are integral schemes and that $2$ is invertible | |
| in the structure sheaf of $Y$, i.e., $2 \in \Gamma(Y, \mathcal{O}_Y)$ | |
| is invertible. Show that the $\mathcal{O}_Y$-module map | |
| $$ | |
| f^\sharp : \mathcal{O}_Y \longrightarrow f_*\mathcal{O}_X | |
| $$ | |
| has a left inverse, i.e., there is an $\mathcal{O}_Y$-module map | |
| $\tau : f_*\mathcal{O}_X \to \mathcal{O}_Y$ | |
| with $\tau \circ f^\sharp = \text{id}$. | |
| Conclude that $H^n(Y, \mathcal{O}_Y) \to H^n(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$ | |
| is injective\footnote{There does exist a finite locally free morphism | |
| $X \to Y$ between integral schemes of degree $2$ where the map | |
| $H^1(Y, \mathcal{O}_Y) \to H^1(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$ is not injective.}. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-pic} | |
| Let $X$ be a scheme (or a locally ringed space). The rule | |
| $U \mapsto \mathcal{O}_X(U)^*$ defines a sheaf of groups | |
| denoted $\mathcal{O}_X^*$. | |
| Briefly explain why the Picard group of $X$ | |
| (Definition \ref{definition-picard-group}) is | |
| equal to $H^1(X, \mathcal{O}_X^*)$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-pic-nontrivial} | |
| Give an example of an affine scheme $X$ with nontrivial $\Pic(X)$. | |
| Conclude using Exercise \ref{exercise-pic} that $H^1(X, -)$ is not the | |
| zero functor for any such $X$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-kill-cohomology-complement} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring. Let $I = (f_1, \ldots, f_t)$ be a finitely generated ideal | |
| of $A$. Let $U \subset \Spec(A)$ be the complement of $V(I)$. | |
| Given a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_{\Spec(A)}$-module $\mathcal{F}$ | |
| and $\xi \in H^p(U, \mathcal{F})$ with $p > 0$, show that there exists | |
| $n > 0$ such that $f_i^n \xi = 0$ for $i = 1, \ldots, t$. | |
| Hint: One possible way to proceed is to use the complex | |
| you found in Exercise \ref{exercise-compute-cohomology-punctured}. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-h0-complement} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring. Let $I = (f_1, \ldots, f_t)$ be a | |
| finitely generated ideal of $A$. Let $U \subset \Spec(A)$ | |
| be the complement of $V(I)$. Let $M$ be an $A$-module | |
| whose $I$-torsion is zero, i.e., | |
| $0 = \Ker((f_1, \ldots, f_t) : M \to M^{\oplus t})$. | |
| Show that there is a canonical isomorphism | |
| $$ | |
| H^0(U, \widetilde{M}) = \colim \Hom_A(I^n, M). | |
| $$ | |
| Warning: this is not trivial. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-Noetherian} | |
| Let $A$ be a Noetherian ring. Let $I$ be an ideal of $A$. | |
| Let $M$ be an $A$-module. Let $M[I^\infty]$ be the set of | |
| $I$-power torsion elements defined by | |
| $$ | |
| M[I^\infty] = \{x \in M \mid | |
| \text{ there exists an }n \geq 1\text{ such that }I^nx = 0\} | |
| $$ | |
| Set $M' = M/M[I^\infty]$. Then the $I$-power torsion of $M'$ is zero. | |
| Show that | |
| $$ | |
| \colim \Hom_A(I^n, M) = \colim \Hom_A(I^n, M'). | |
| $$ | |
| Warning: this is not trivial. Hints: (1) try to reduce to $M$ finite, | |
| (2) show any element of $\Ext^1_A(I^n, N)$ | |
| maps to zero in $\Ext^1_A(I^{n + m}, N)$ for some $m > 0$ | |
| if $N = M[I^\infty]$ and $M$ finite, (3) show the same thing | |
| as in (2) for $\Hom_A(I^n, N)$, (3) consider the long exact | |
| sequence | |
| $$ | |
| 0 \to \Hom_A(I^n, M[I^\infty]) \to \Hom_A(I^n, M) \to \Hom_A(I^n, M') | |
| \to \Ext^1_A(I^n, M[I^\infty]) | |
| $$ | |
| for $M$ finite and compare with the sequence for $I^{n + m}$ to conclude. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Cohomology revisited} | |
| \label{section-more-more-cohomology} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-nonkillable} | |
| Make an example of a field $k$, a curve $X$ over $k$, | |
| an invertible $\mathcal{O}_X$-module $\mathcal{L}$ and | |
| a cohomology class $\xi \in H^1(X, \mathcal{L})$ with | |
| the following property: for every surjective | |
| finite morphism $\pi : Y \to X$ of schemes the element $\xi$ | |
| pulls back to a nonzero element of $H^1(Y, \pi^*\mathcal{L})$. | |
| Hint: construct $X$, $k$, $\mathcal{L}$ such that | |
| there is a short exact sequence | |
| $0 \to \mathcal{L} \to \mathcal{O}_X \to i_*\mathcal{O}_Z \to 0$ | |
| where $Z \subset X$ is a closed subscheme consisting of | |
| more than $1$ closed point. Then look at what happens when you | |
| pullback. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-cohomology-cycle-curves} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. | |
| Let $X$ be a projective $1$-dimensional scheme. | |
| Suppose that $X$ contains a cycle of curves, i.e., suppose | |
| there exist an $n \geq 2$ and pairwise distinct | |
| $1$-dimensional integral closed subschemes | |
| $C_1, \ldots, C_n$ and pairwise distinct closed points | |
| $x_1, \ldots, x_n \in X$ such that $x_n \in C_n \cap C_1$ | |
| and $x_i \in C_i \cap C_{i + 1}$ | |
| for $i = 1, \ldots, n - 1$. | |
| Prove that $H^1(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$ is nonzero. | |
| Hint: Let $\mathcal{F}$ be the image of the map | |
| $\mathcal{O}_X \to \bigoplus \mathcal{O}_{C_i}$, | |
| and show $H^1(X, \mathcal{F})$ is nonzero | |
| using that $\kappa(x_i) = k$ and $H^0(C_i, \mathcal{O}_{C_i}) = k$. | |
| Also use that $H^2(X, -) = 0$ by Grothendieck's theorem. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-surface} | |
| Let $X$ be a projective surface over an algebraically closed field $k$. | |
| Prove there exists a proper closed subscheme $Z \subset X$ such that | |
| $H^1(Z, \mathcal{O}_Z)$ is nonzero. Hint: Use | |
| Exercise \ref{exercise-cohomology-cycle-curves}. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-surface-better} | |
| Let $X$ be a projective surface over an algebraically closed field $k$. | |
| Show that for every $n \geq 0$ | |
| there exists a proper closed subscheme $Z \subset X$ such that | |
| $\dim_k H^1(Z, \mathcal{O}_Z) > n$. | |
| Only explain how to do this by modifying the arguments | |
| in Exercise \ref{exercise-surface} and | |
| \ref{exercise-cohomology-cycle-curves}; don't give all the details. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-surface-h2-nonzero} | |
| Let $X$ be a projective surface over an algebraically closed field $k$. | |
| Prove there exists a coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module $\mathcal{F}$ | |
| such that $H^2(X, \mathcal{F})$ is nonzero. Hint: Use the result | |
| of Exercise \ref{exercise-surface-better} and a cleverly chosen | |
| exact sequence. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-kunneth} | |
| Let $X$ and $Y$ be schemes over a field $k$ (feel free to assume | |
| $X$ and $Y$ are nice, for example qcqs or projective over $k$). | |
| Set $X \times Y = X \times_{\Spec(k)} Y$ with projections | |
| $p : X \times Y \to X$ and $q : X \times Y \to Y$. For | |
| a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module $\mathcal{F}$ and | |
| a quasi-coherent $\mathcal{O}_Y$-module $\mathcal{G}$ prove that | |
| $$ | |
| H^n(X \times Y, | |
| p^*\mathcal{F} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{X \times Y}} q^*\mathcal{G}) = | |
| \bigoplus\nolimits_{a + b = n} | |
| H^a(X, \mathcal{F}) \otimes_k H^b(Y, \mathcal{G}) | |
| $$ | |
| or just show that this holds when one takes dimensions. | |
| Extra points for ``clean'' solutions. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-Oab} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $X = \mathbf{P}|^1 \times \mathbf{P}^1$ | |
| be the product of the projective line over $k$ with itself | |
| with projections $p : X \to \mathbf{P}^1_k$ and $q : X \to \mathbf{P}^1_k$. | |
| Let | |
| $$ | |
| \mathcal{O}(a, b) = p^*\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^1_k}(a) | |
| \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} q^*\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^1_k}(b) | |
| $$ | |
| Compute the dimensions of $H^i(X, \mathcal{O}(a, b))$ | |
| for all $i, a, b$. Hint: Use Exercise \ref{exercise-kunneth}. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Cohomology and Hilbert polynomials} | |
| \label{section-cohomology-hilbert-polynomials} | |
| \begin{situation} | |
| \label{situation-hilbert-polynomial} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $X = \mathbf{P}^n_k$ be | |
| $n$-dimensional projective space. Let $\mathcal{F}$ | |
| be a coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-module. Recall that | |
| $$ | |
| \chi(X, \mathcal{F}) = | |
| \sum\nolimits_{i = 0}^n (-1)^i \dim_k H^i(X, \mathcal{F}) | |
| $$ | |
| Recall that the {\it Hilbert polynomial} of $\mathcal{F}$ is the function | |
| $$ | |
| t \longmapsto \chi(X, \mathcal{F}(t)) | |
| $$ | |
| We also recall that | |
| $\mathcal{F}(t) = \mathcal{F} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} \mathcal{O}_X(t)$ | |
| where $\mathcal{O}_X(t)$ is the $t$th twist of the structure sheaf | |
| as in Constructions, Definition \ref{constructions-definition-twist}. | |
| In Varieties, Subsection \ref{varieties-subsection-hilbert} we have | |
| proved the Hilbert polynomial is a polynomial in $t$. | |
| \end{situation} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-hilbert-pol-easy} | |
| In Situation \ref{situation-hilbert-polynomial}. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item If $P(t)$ is the Hilbert polynomial of $\mathcal{F}$, | |
| what is the Hilbert polynomial of $\mathcal{F}(-13)$. | |
| \item If $P_i$ is the Hilbert polynomial of $\mathcal{F}_i$, | |
| what is the Hilbert polynomial of $\mathcal{F}_1 \oplus \mathcal{F}_2$. | |
| \item If $P_i$ is the Hilbert polynomial of $\mathcal{F}_i$ and | |
| $\mathcal{F}$ is the kernel of a surjective map | |
| $\mathcal{F}_1 \to \mathcal{F}_2$, what is the Hilbert polynomial of | |
| $\mathcal{F}$? | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-find-given-hilbert-pol-dim-1} | |
| In Situation \ref{situation-hilbert-polynomial} assume $n \geq 1$. | |
| Find a coherent sheaf whose Hilbert polynomial is $t - 101$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-find-given-hilbert-pol-dim-2} | |
| In Situation \ref{situation-hilbert-polynomial} assume $n \geq 2$. | |
| Find a coherent sheaf whose Hilbert polynomial is | |
| $t^2/2 + t/2 - 1$. (This is a bit tricky; it suffices | |
| if you just show there is such a coherent sheaf.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-bound-genus-in-degree} | |
| In Situation \ref{situation-hilbert-polynomial} assume $n \geq 2$ | |
| and $k$ algebraically closed. | |
| Let $C \subset X$ be an integral closed subscheme of dimension $1$. | |
| In other words, $C$ is a projective curve. | |
| Let $d t + e$ be the Hilbert polynomial of $\mathcal{O}_C$ | |
| viewed as a coherent sheaf on $X$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Give an upper bound on $e$. (Hints: Use that | |
| $\mathcal{O}_C(t)$ only has cohomology in degrees $0$ and $1$ | |
| and study $H^0(C, \mathcal{O}_C)$.) | |
| \item Pick a global section $s$ of $\mathcal{O}_X(1)$ | |
| which intersects $C$ transversally, i.e., such that there | |
| are pairwise distinct closed points $c_1, \ldots, c_r \in C$ and | |
| a short exact sequence | |
| $$ | |
| 0 \to \mathcal{O}_C \xrightarrow{s} \mathcal{O}_C(1) \to | |
| \bigoplus\nolimits_{i = 1, \ldots, r} k_{c_i} \to 0 | |
| $$ | |
| where $k_{c_i}$ is the skyscraper sheaf with value $k$ in $c_i$. | |
| (Such an $s$ exists; please just use this.) | |
| Show that $r = d$. (Hint: twist the sequence and see what you get.) | |
| \item Twisting the short exact sequence gives a $k$-linear map | |
| $\varphi_t : \Gamma(C, \mathcal{O}_C(t)) \to \bigoplus_{i = 1, \ldots, d} k$ | |
| for any $t$. Show that if this map is surjective for $t \geq d - 1$. | |
| \item Give a lower bound on $e$ in terms of $d$. (Hint: show that | |
| $H^1(C, \mathcal{O}_C(d - 2)) = 0$ using the result of (3) and use | |
| vanishing.) | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-three-quadrics-in-plane} | |
| In Situation \ref{situation-hilbert-polynomial} assume $n = 2$. | |
| Let $s_1, s_2, s_3 \in \Gamma(X, \mathcal{O}_X(2))$ be three | |
| quadric equations. Consider the coherent sheaf | |
| $$ | |
| \mathcal{F} = \Coker\left(\mathcal{O}_X(-2)^{\oplus 3} | |
| \xrightarrow{s_1, s_2, s_3} \mathcal{O}_X\right) | |
| $$ | |
| List the possible Hilbert polynomials of such $\mathcal{F}$. | |
| (Try to visualize intersections of quadrics in the projective plane.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Curves} | |
| \label{section-curves} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-closed-subset-vanshing} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $X$ be a projective curve | |
| over $k$. Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an invertible $\mathcal{O}_X$-module. | |
| Let $s_0, \ldots, s_n \in H^0(X, \mathcal{L})$ | |
| be global sections of $\mathcal{L}$. | |
| Prove there is a natural closed subscheme | |
| $$ | |
| Z \subset | |
| \mathbf{P}^n \times X | |
| $$ | |
| such that the closed point | |
| $((\lambda_0 : \ldots : \lambda_n), x)$ | |
| is in $Z$ if and only if the section | |
| $\lambda_0 s_0 + \ldots + \lambda_n s_n$ | |
| vanishes at $x$. (Hint: describe $Z$ affine locally.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-diagonal-cartier} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $X$ be a smooth curve over $k$. | |
| Let $r \geq 1$. Show that the closed subset | |
| $$ | |
| D \subset X \times X^r = X^{r + 1} | |
| $$ | |
| whose closed points are the tuples $(x, x_1, \ldots, x_r)$ with | |
| $x = x_i$ for some $i$, has an invertible ideal sheaf. In other words, | |
| show that | |
| $D$ is an effective Cartier divisor. Hints: reduce to $r = 1$ and | |
| use that $X$ is a smooth curves to say something about the diagonal | |
| (look in books for this). | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-one-divisor-in-another} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $X$ be a smooth projective curve | |
| over $k$. Let $T$ be a scheme of finite type over $k$ and let | |
| $$ | |
| D_1 \subset X \times T | |
| \quad\text{and}\quad | |
| D_2 \subset X \times T | |
| $$ | |
| be two effective Cartier divisors such that for $t \in T$ the | |
| fibres $D_{i, t} \subset X_t$ are not dense (i.e., do not contain | |
| the generic point of the curve $X_t$). | |
| Prove that there is a canonical closed subscheme | |
| $Z \subset T$ such that a closed point $t \in T$ is in $Z$ | |
| if and only if for the scheme theoretic fibres $D_{1, t}$, $D_{2, t}$ | |
| of $D_1$, $D_2$ we have | |
| $$ | |
| D_{1, t} \subset D_{2, t} | |
| $$ | |
| as closed subschemes of $X_t$. | |
| Hints: Show that, possibly after shrinking $T$, you may | |
| assume $T = \Spec(A)$ is affine and there is an affine open $U \subset X$ | |
| such that $D_i \subset U \times T$. Then show that | |
| $M_1 = \Gamma(D_1, \mathcal{O}_{D_1})$ is a finite locally free $A$-module | |
| (here you will need some nontrivial algebra --- ask your friends). | |
| After shrinking $T$ you may assume $M_1$ is a free $A$-module. | |
| Then look at | |
| $$ | |
| \Gamma(U \times T, \mathcal{I}_{D_2}) \to M_1 = A^{\oplus N} | |
| $$ | |
| and you define $Z$ as the closed subscheme cut out by the ideal generated | |
| by coefficients of vectors in the image of this map. Explain why this works | |
| (this will require perhaps a bit more commutative algebra). | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-closed-subset-vanshing-r} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $X$ be a smooth projective curve | |
| over $k$. Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an invertible $\mathcal{O}_X$-module. | |
| Let $s_0, \ldots, s_n \in H^0(X, \mathcal{L})$ | |
| be global sections of $\mathcal{L}$. Let $r \geq 1$. | |
| Prove there is a natural closed subscheme | |
| $$ | |
| Z \subset | |
| \mathbf{P}^n \times X \times \ldots \times X = \mathbf{P}^n \times X^r | |
| $$ | |
| such that the closed point | |
| $((\lambda_0 : \ldots : \lambda_n), x_1, \ldots, x_r)$ | |
| is in $Z$ if and only if the section | |
| $s_\lambda = \lambda_0 s_0 + \ldots + \lambda_n s_n$ | |
| vanishes on the divisor $D = x_1 + \ldots + x_r$, i.e., | |
| the section $s_\lambda$ is in $\mathcal{L}(-D)$. | |
| Hint: explain how this follows by combining then results of | |
| Exercises \ref{exercise-diagonal-cartier} and | |
| \ref{exercise-one-divisor-in-another}. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-effective} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $X$ be a smooth projective curve | |
| over $k$. Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an invertible $\mathcal{O}_X$-module. | |
| Show that there is a natural closed subset | |
| $$ | |
| Z \subset X^r | |
| $$ | |
| such that a closed point $(x_1, \ldots, x_r)$ of $X^r$ is in $Z$ | |
| if and only if $\mathcal{L}(-x_1 - \ldots -x_r)$ has a nonzero | |
| global section. Hint: use Exercise \ref{exercise-closed-subset-vanshing-r}. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-difference-effective} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $X$ be a smooth projective curve | |
| over $k$. Let $r \geq s$ be integers. Show that there is a natural closed | |
| subset | |
| $$ | |
| Z \subset X^r \times X^s | |
| $$ | |
| such that a closed point $(x_1, \ldots, x_r, y_1, \ldots, y_s)$ of | |
| $X^r \times X^s$ is in $Z$ | |
| if and only if $x_1 + \ldots + x_r - y_1 - \ldots - y_s$ | |
| is linearly equivalent to an effective divisor. | |
| Hint: Choose an auxilliary invertible module $\mathcal{L}$ | |
| of very high degree so that $\mathcal{L}(-D)$ has a nonvanshing | |
| section for any effective divisor $D$ of degree $r$. | |
| Then use the result of Exercise \ref{exercise-effective} twice. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-genus-7} | |
| Choose your favorite algebraically closed field $k$. | |
| As best as you can determine all possible $\mathfrak g^r_d$ | |
| that can exist on some curve of genus $7$. | |
| While doing this also try to | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item determine in which cases the $\mathfrak g^r_d$ is base point free, and | |
| \item determine in which cases the $\mathfrak g^r_d$ gives a closed | |
| embedding in $\mathbf{P}^r$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| Do the same thing if you assume your curve is ``general'' (make | |
| up your own notion of general -- this may be easier than the question above). | |
| Do the same thing if you assume your curve is hyperelliptic. | |
| Do the same thing if you assume your curve is trigonal | |
| (and not hyperelliptic). Etc. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Moduli} | |
| \label{section-moduli} | |
| \noindent | |
| In this section we consider some naive approaches to moduli of | |
| algebraic geometric objects. | |
| \medskip\noindent | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Suppose that $M$ is a | |
| moduli problem over $k$. We won't define exactly what this means | |
| here, but in each exercise it should be clear what we mean. | |
| To understand the following it suffices to know | |
| what the objects of $M$ over $k$ are, what the isomorphisms between | |
| objects of $M$ over $k$ are, and what the families of object of $M$ | |
| over a variety are. Then we say the {\it number of moduli of $M$} | |
| is $d \geq 0$ if the following are true | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item there is a finite number of families $X_i \to V_i$, $i = 1, \ldots, n$ | |
| such that every object of $M$ over $k$ is isomorphic to a fibre of one | |
| of these and such that $\max \dim(V_i) = d$, and | |
| \item there is no way to do this with a smaller $d$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| This is really just a very rough approximation of better notions in | |
| the literature. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-number-moduli-lines-conics} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $d \geq 1$ and $n \geq 1$. | |
| Let us say the moduli of hypersurfaces of degree $d$ in $P^n$ is given by | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item an object is a hypersurface $X \subset \mathbf{P}^n_k$ | |
| of degree $d$, | |
| \item an isomorphism between two objects $X \subset \mathbf{P}^n_k$ | |
| and $Y \subset \mathbf{P}^n_k$ is an element $g \in \text{PGL}_n(k)$ | |
| such that $g(X) = Y$, and | |
| \item a family of hypersurfaces over a variety $V$ is a closed | |
| subscheme $X \subset \mathbf{P}^n_V$ such that for all $v \in V$ | |
| the scheme theoretic fibre $X_v$ of $X \to V$ is | |
| a hypersurfaces in $\mathbf{P}^n_v$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| Compute (if you can -- these get progressively harder) | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item the number of moduli when $n = 1$ and $d$ arbitrary, | |
| \item the number of moduli when $n = 2$ and $d = 1$, | |
| \item the number of moduli when $n = 2$ and $d = 2$, | |
| \item the number of moduli when $n \geq 1$ and $d = 2$, | |
| \item the number of moduli when $n = 2$ and $d = 3$, | |
| \item the number of moduli when $n = 3$ and $d = 3$, and | |
| \item the number of moduli when $n = 2$ and $d = 4$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-number-moduli-hyperelliptic} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $g \geq 2$. | |
| Let us say the moduli of hyperelliptic curves of genus $g$ is given by | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item an object is a smooth projective hyperelliptic curve $X$ | |
| of genus $g$, | |
| \item an isomorphism between two objects $X$ and $Y$ is an | |
| isomorphism $X \to Y$ of schemes over $k$, and | |
| \item a family of hyperelliptic curves of genus $g$ over a variety $V$ is a | |
| proper flat\footnote{You can drop this assumption without changing | |
| the answer to the question.} morphism $X \to Y$ such that all scheme | |
| theoretic fibres of $X \to V$ are smooth projective hyperelliptic curves | |
| of genus $g$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| Show that the number of moduli is $2g - 1$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Global Exts} | |
| \label{section-global-exts} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-ext-line-plane-p3} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $X = \mathbf{P}^3_k$. Let $L \subset X$ | |
| and $P \subset X$ be a line and a plane, viewed as closed subschemes | |
| cut out by $1$, resp., $2$ linear equations. Compute | |
| the dimensions of | |
| $$ | |
| \Ext^i_X(\mathcal{O}_L, \mathcal{O}_P) | |
| $$ | |
| for all $i$. | |
| Make sure to do both the case where $L$ is contained in $P$ and the | |
| case where $L$ is not contained in $P$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-ext-point} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $X = \mathbf{P}^n_k$. Let $Z \subset X$ | |
| be a closed $k$-rational point viewed as a closed subscheme. | |
| For example the point with homogeneous coordinates | |
| $(1 : 0 : \ldots : 0)$. Compute the dimensions of | |
| $$ | |
| \Ext^i_X(\mathcal{O}_Z, \mathcal{O}_Z) | |
| $$ | |
| for all $i$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-ext-pairings} | |
| Let $X$ be a ringed space. Define cup-product maps | |
| $$ | |
| \Ext^i_X(\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{H}) | |
| \times | |
| \Ext^j_X(\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{G}) | |
| \longrightarrow | |
| \Ext^{i + j}_X(\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{H}) | |
| $$ | |
| for $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules $\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{G}, \mathcal{H}$. | |
| (Hint: this is a super general thing.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-move-out-locally-free} | |
| Let $X$ be a ringed space. Let $\mathcal{E}$ be a finite locally free | |
| $\mathcal{O}_X$-module with dual | |
| $\mathcal{E}^\vee = \SheafHom_{\mathcal{O}_X}(\mathcal{E}, \mathcal{O}_X)$. | |
| Prove the following statements | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $\SheafExt^i_{\mathcal{O}_X}( | |
| \mathcal{F} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} \mathcal{E}, \mathcal{G}) = | |
| \SheafExt^i_{\mathcal{O}_X}( | |
| \mathcal{F}, | |
| \mathcal{E}^\vee \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} \mathcal{G}) = | |
| \SheafExt^i_{\mathcal{O}_X}( | |
| \mathcal{F}, \mathcal{G}) \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} \mathcal{E}^\vee$, and | |
| \item $\Ext^i_X( | |
| \mathcal{F} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} \mathcal{E}, \mathcal{G}) = | |
| \Ext^i_X(\mathcal{F}, | |
| \mathcal{E}^\vee \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} \mathcal{G})$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| Here $\mathcal{F}$ and $\mathcal{G}$ are $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules. Conclude | |
| that | |
| $$ | |
| \Ext^i_X(\mathcal{E}, \mathcal{G}) = | |
| H^i(X, \mathcal{E}^\vee \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} \mathcal{G}) | |
| $$ | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-trace-on-ext} | |
| Let $X$ be a ringed space. Let $\mathcal{E}$ be a finite locally free | |
| $\mathcal{O}_X$-module. Construct a trace map | |
| $$ | |
| \Ext^i_X(\mathcal{E}, \mathcal{E}) \to H^i(X, \mathcal{O}_X) | |
| $$ | |
| for all $i$. Generalize to a trace map | |
| $$ | |
| \Ext^i_X(\mathcal{E}, \mathcal{E} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} \mathcal{F}) | |
| \to H^i(X, \mathcal{F}) | |
| $$ | |
| for any $\mathcal{O}_X$-module $\mathcal{F}$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-duality} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $X = \mathbf{P}^d_k$. Set | |
| $\omega_{X/k} = \mathcal{O}_X(-d - 1)$. | |
| Prove that for finite locally free modules | |
| $\mathcal{E}$, $\mathcal{F}$ the cup product on Ext | |
| combined with the trace map on Ext | |
| $$ | |
| \Ext^i_X(\mathcal{E}, \mathcal{F} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} \omega_{X/k}) | |
| \times | |
| \Ext^{d - i}_X(\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{E}) | |
| \to | |
| \Ext_X^d(\mathcal{F}, \mathcal{F} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} \omega_{X/k}) | |
| \to | |
| H^d(X, \omega_{X/k}) = k | |
| $$ | |
| produces a nondegenerate pairing. Hint: you can either reprove duality | |
| in this setting or you can reduce to cohomology of sheaves and apply the | |
| Serre duality theorem as proved in the lectures. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Divisors} | |
| \label{section-divisors} | |
| \noindent | |
| We collect all relevant definitions here in one spot for convenience. | |
| \begin{definition} | |
| \label{definition-divisor} | |
| Throughout, let $S$ be any scheme and let | |
| $X$ be a Noetherian, integral scheme. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item A {\it Weil divisor} on $X$ is a formal linear combination | |
| $\Sigma n_i[Z_i]$ of prime divisors $Z_i$ with integer coefficients. | |
| \item A {\it prime divisor} is a closed subscheme $Z \subset X$, | |
| which is integral with generic point $\xi \in Z$ such that | |
| ${\mathcal O}_{X, \xi}$ has dimension $1$. We will use the notation | |
| ${\mathcal O}_{X, Z} = {\mathcal O}_{X, \xi}$ | |
| when $\xi \in Z \subset X$ is as above. Note that ${\mathcal O}_{X, Z} \subset | |
| K(X)$ is a subring of the function field of $X$. | |
| \item The {\it Weil divisor associated to a rational function | |
| $f \in K(X)^\ast$} is the sum $\Sigma v_Z(f)[Z]$. Here $v_Z(f)$ is | |
| defined as follows | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item If $f \in {\mathcal O}_{X, Z}^\ast$ then $v_Z(f) = 0$. | |
| \item If $f \in {\mathcal O}_{X, Z}$ then | |
| $$ | |
| v_Z(f) = \text{length}_{{\mathcal O}_{X, Z}}({\mathcal O}_{X, Z}/(f)). | |
| $$ | |
| \item If $f = \frac{a}{b}$ with $a, b \in {\mathcal O}_{X, Z}$ | |
| then | |
| $$ | |
| v_Z(f) = \text{length}_{{\mathcal O}_{X, Z}}({\mathcal O}_{X, Z}/(a)) - | |
| \text{length}_{{\mathcal O}_{X, Z}}({\mathcal O}_{X, Z}/(b)). | |
| $$ | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \item An {\it effective Cartier divisor} on a scheme $S$ | |
| is a closed subscheme $D \subset S$ such that every point $d\in D$ | |
| has an affine open neighbourhood $\Spec(A) = U \subset S$ in $S$ | |
| so that $D \cap U = \Spec(A/(f))$ with $f \in A$ a nonzerodivisor. | |
| \item The {\it Weil divisor $[D]$ associated to an effective | |
| Cartier divisor $D \subset X$} of our Noetherian integral | |
| scheme $X$ is defined as the sum $\Sigma v_Z(D)[Z]$ where | |
| $v_Z(D)$ is defined as follows | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item If the generic point $\xi$ of $Z$ is not in $D$ | |
| then $v_Z(D) = 0$. | |
| \item If the generic point $\xi$ of $Z$ is in $D$ | |
| then | |
| $$ | |
| v_Z(D) = \text{length}_{{\mathcal O}_{X, Z}}({\mathcal O}_{X, Z}/(f)) | |
| $$ | |
| where $f \in {\mathcal O}_{X, Z} = {\mathcal O}_{X, \xi}$ is the nonzerodivisor | |
| which defines $D$ in an affine neighbourhood of $\xi$ (as in (4) above). | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \item Let $S$ be a scheme. The {\it sheaf of total quotient | |
| rings ${\mathcal K}_S$} is the sheaf of ${\mathcal O}_S$-algebras which is | |
| the sheafification of the pre-sheaf ${\mathcal K}'$ defined as follows. | |
| For $U \subset S$ open we set ${\mathcal K}'(U) = S_U^{-1}{\mathcal O}_S(U)$ | |
| where $S_U \subset {\mathcal O}_S(U)$ is the multiplicative subset | |
| consisting of sections $f \in {\mathcal O}_S(U)$ such that the germ | |
| of $f$ in ${\mathcal O}_{S, u}$ is a nonzerodivisor for every $u\in U$. | |
| In particular the elements of $S_U$ are all nonzerodivisors. | |
| Thus ${\mathcal O}_S$ is a subsheaf of ${\mathcal K}_S$, and we get a | |
| short exact sequence | |
| $$ | |
| 0 \to {\mathcal O}_S^\ast \to {\mathcal K}_S^\ast \to | |
| {\mathcal K}_S^\ast/{\mathcal O}_S^\ast \to 0. | |
| $$ | |
| \item A {\it Cartier divisor} on a scheme $S$ is a global | |
| section of the quotient sheaf ${\mathcal K}_S^\ast/{\mathcal O}_S^\ast$. | |
| \item The {\it Weil divisor associated to a Cartier divisor} | |
| $\tau \in \Gamma(X, {\mathcal K}_X^\ast/{\mathcal O}_X^\ast)$ over our | |
| Noetherian integral scheme | |
| $X$ is the sum $\Sigma v_Z(\tau)[Z]$ where $v_Z(\tau)$ is defined | |
| as by the following recipe | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item If the germ of $\tau$ at the generic point $\xi$ | |
| of $Z$ is zero -- in other words the image of $\tau$ in the stalk | |
| $({\mathcal K}^\ast/{\mathcal O}^\ast)_\xi$ is ``zero'' -- then $v_Z(\tau) = 0$. | |
| \item Find an affine open neighbourhood $\Spec(A) = U \subset X$ | |
| so that $\tau|_U$ is the image of a section $f \in {\mathcal K}(U)$ | |
| and moreover $f = a/b$ with $a, b \in A$. Then we set | |
| $$ | |
| v_Z(f) = \text{length}_{{\mathcal O}_{X, Z}}({\mathcal O}_{X, Z}/(a)) - | |
| \text{length}_{{\mathcal O}_{X, Z}}({\mathcal O}_{X, Z}/(b)). | |
| $$ | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{definition} | |
| \begin{remarks} | |
| \label{remarks-divisors} | |
| Here are some trivial remarks. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item On a Noetherian integral scheme $X$ the | |
| sheaf ${\mathcal K}_X$ is constant with value the function field $K(X)$. | |
| \item To make sense out of the definitions above one needs | |
| to show that | |
| $$ | |
| \text{length}_{\mathcal O}({\mathcal O}/(ab)) = | |
| \text{length}_{\mathcal O}({\mathcal O}/(a)) + | |
| \text{length}_{\mathcal O}({\mathcal O}/(b)) | |
| $$ | |
| for any pair $(a, b)$ of nonzero elements of a Noetherian 1-dimensional | |
| local domain ${\mathcal O}$. This will be done in the lectures. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{remarks} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-effective-cartier-cartier} | |
| (On any scheme.) | |
| Describe how to assign a Cartier divisor to an effective Cartier divisor. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-rational-function-cartier} | |
| (On an integral scheme.) | |
| Describe how to assign a Cartier divisor $D$ to a rational function | |
| $f$ such that the Weil divisor associated to $D$ and to $f$ agree. | |
| (This is silly.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-weil-not-cartier} | |
| Give an example of a Weil divisor on a variety which is not | |
| the Weil divisor associated to any Cartier divisor. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-weil-Q-cartier} | |
| Give an example of a Weil divisor $D$ on a variety which is not | |
| the Weil divisor associated to any Cartier divisor but | |
| such that $nD$ is the Weil divisor associated to a Cartier | |
| divisor for some $n > 1$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-weil-not-Q-cartier} | |
| Give an example of a Weil divisor $D$ on a variety which is not | |
| the Weil divisor associated to any Cartier divisor and | |
| such that $nD$ is NOT the Weil divisor associated to a Cartier | |
| divisor for any $n > 1$. | |
| (Hint: Consider a cone, for example $X : xy - zw = 0$ in | |
| $\mathbf{A}^4_k$. Try to show that $D = [x = 0, z = 0]$ works.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-cartier-not-difference-effective-cartier} | |
| On a separated scheme $X$ of finite type over a field: | |
| Give an example of a Cartier divisor which is not the difference of | |
| two effective Cartier divisors. | |
| Hint: Find some $X$ which does not have any nonempty effective Cartier | |
| divisors for example the scheme constructed in | |
| \cite[III Exercise 5.9]{H}. There is even an example | |
| with $X$ a variety -- namely the variety of | |
| Exercise \ref{exercise-nonprojective}. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-nonprojective} | |
| Example of a nonprojective proper variety. | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $L \subset \mathbf{P}^3_k$ be a line and | |
| let $C \subset \mathbf{P}^3_k$ be a nonsingular conic. Assume that | |
| $C \cap L = \emptyset$. Choose an | |
| isomorphism $\varphi : L \to C$. Let $X$ be the $k$-variety obtained | |
| by glueing $C$ to $L$ via $\varphi$. In other words there is | |
| a surjective proper birational morphism | |
| $$ | |
| \pi : \mathbf{P}^3_k \longrightarrow X | |
| $$ | |
| and an open $U \subset X$ such that $\pi : \pi^{-1}(U) \to U$ is | |
| an isomorphism, $\pi^{-1}(U) = \mathbf{P}^3_k \setminus (L \cup C)$ | |
| and such that $\pi|_L = \pi|_C \circ \varphi$. (These conditions do not | |
| yet uniquely define $X$. In order to do this you need to specify the | |
| structure sheaf of $X$ along points of $Z = X \setminus U$.) | |
| Show $X$ exists, is a proper variety, but is not projective. | |
| (Hint: For existence use the result of | |
| Exercise \ref{exercise-prepare-glueing}. For non-projectivity use that | |
| $\Pic(\mathbf{P}^3_k) = \mathbf{Z}$ to show that $X$ cannot have | |
| an ample invertible sheaf.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Differentials} | |
| \label{section-differentials} | |
| \noindent | |
| {\bf Definitions and results.} K\"ahler differentials. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Let $R \to A$ be a ring map. The {\it module of K\"ahler | |
| differentials of $A$ over $R$} is denoted $\Omega_{A/R}$. | |
| It is generated by the elements $\text{d}a$, $a \in A$ | |
| subject to the relations: | |
| $$ | |
| \text{d}(a_1 + a_2) = \text{d}a_1 + \text{d}a_2,\quad | |
| \text{d}(a_1a_2) = a_1\text{d}a_2 + a_2\text{d}a_1,\quad | |
| \text{d}r = 0 | |
| $$ | |
| The canonical universal $R$-derivation $\text{d} : A \to \Omega_{A/R}$ | |
| maps $a\mapsto \text{d}a$. | |
| \item Consider the short exact sequence | |
| $$ | |
| 0 \to I \to A \otimes_R A \to A \to 0 | |
| $$ | |
| which defines the ideal $I$. There is a canonical derivation | |
| $\text{d} : A \to I/I^2$ which maps $a$ to the class of | |
| $a \otimes 1 - 1 \otimes a$. This is another presentation of | |
| the module of derivations of $A$ over $R$, in other words | |
| $$ | |
| (I/I^2, \text{d}) \cong (\Omega_{A/R}, \text{d}). | |
| $$ | |
| \item For multiplicative subsets $S_R \subset R$ and | |
| $S_A \subset A$ such that $S_R$ maps into $S_A$ we have | |
| $$ | |
| \Omega_{S_A^{-1}A / S_R^{-1}R} = | |
| S_A^{-1}\Omega_{A/R}. | |
| $$ | |
| \item If $A$ is a finitely presented $R$-algebra then | |
| $\Omega_{A/R}$ is a finitely presented $A$-module. Hence in | |
| this case the {\it fitting} ideals of $\Omega_{A/R}$ are defined. | |
| \item Let $f : X \to S$ be a morphism of schemes. There is | |
| a quasi-coherent sheaf of ${\mathcal O}_X$-modules $\Omega_{X/S}$ | |
| and a ${\mathcal O}_S$-linear derivation | |
| $$ | |
| \text{d} : {\mathcal O}_X \longrightarrow \Omega_{X/S} | |
| $$ | |
| such that for any affine opens $\Spec(A) = U \subset X$, | |
| $\Spec(R) = V \subset S$ | |
| with $f(U) \subset V$ we have | |
| $$ | |
| \Gamma(\Spec(A), \Omega_{X/S}) = \Omega_{A/R} | |
| $$ | |
| compatibly with $\text{d}$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-dual-numbers} | |
| Let $k[\epsilon]$ be the ring of dual numbers | |
| over the field $k$, i.e., $\epsilon^2 = 0$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Consider the ring map | |
| $$ | |
| R = k[\epsilon] \to A = k[x, \epsilon]/(\epsilon x) | |
| $$ | |
| Show that the Fitting ideals of $\Omega_{A/R}$ are (starting with the | |
| zeroth Fitting ideal) | |
| $$ | |
| (\epsilon), A, A, \ldots | |
| $$ | |
| \item Consider the map $R = k[t] \to | |
| A = k[x, y, t]/(x(y-t)(y-1), x(x-t))$. Show that the Fitting ideals of | |
| $\Omega_{A/R}$ in $A$ are (assume characteristic $k$ is zero | |
| for simplicity) | |
| $$ | |
| x(2x-t)(2y-t-1)A, \ (x, y, t)\cap (x, y-1, t), \ A, \ A, \ldots | |
| $$ | |
| So the $0$-the Fitting ideal is cut out by a single element of $A$, | |
| the $1$st Fitting ideal defines two closed points of $\Spec(A)$, and | |
| the others are all trivial. | |
| \item Consider the map $R = k[t] \to A = k[x, y, t]/(xy-t^n)$. | |
| Compute the Fitting ideals of $\Omega_{A/R}$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-fitting-omega-not-sings} | |
| The $k$th Fitting ideal of $\Omega_{X/S}$ is commonly used | |
| to define the singular scheme of the morphism $X \to S$ when $X$ has relative | |
| dimension $k$ over $S$. But as part (a) shows, you have to be careful doing | |
| this when your family does not have ``constant'' fibre dimension, e.g., when | |
| it is not flat. As part (b) shows, flatness doesn't guarantee it works either | |
| (and yes this is a flat family). In ``good cases'' -- such as in (c) -- for | |
| families of curves you expect the $0$-th Fitting ideal to be zero and | |
| the $1$st Fitting ideal to define (scheme-theoretically) the singular locus. | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-formally-smooth} | |
| Suppose that $R$ is a ring and | |
| $$ | |
| A = R[x_1, \ldots, x_n]/(f_1, \ldots, f_n). | |
| $$ | |
| Note that we are assuming that $A$ is presented by the same | |
| number of equations as variables. Thus the matrix of partial | |
| derivatives | |
| $$ | |
| ( \partial f_i / \partial x_j ) | |
| $$ | |
| is $n \times n$, i.e., a square matrix. Assume that | |
| its determinant is invertible as an element in $A$. Note that | |
| this is exactly the condition that says that $\Omega_{A/R} = (0)$ | |
| in this case of $n$-generators and $n$ relations. | |
| Let $\pi : B' \to B$ be a surjection of $R$-algebras | |
| whose kernel $J$ has square zero (as an ideal in $B'$). | |
| Let $\varphi : A \to B$ be a homomorphism of $R$-algebras. | |
| Show there exists a unique homomorphism of $R$-algebras | |
| $\varphi' : A \to B'$ such that $\varphi = \pi \circ \varphi'$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-formally-smooth-one-equation} | |
| Find a generalization of the result of Exercise \ref{exercise-formally-smooth} | |
| to the case where $A = R[x, y]/(f)$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-Jacobian-criterion} | |
| Let $k$ be a field, let $f_1, \ldots, f_c \in k[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$, and | |
| let $A = k[x_1, \ldots, x_n]/(f_1, \ldots, f_c)$. | |
| Assume that $f_j(0, \ldots, 0) = 0$. This means that | |
| $\mathfrak m = (x_1, \ldots, x_n)A$ is a maximal ideal. | |
| Prove that the local ring $A_\mathfrak m$ is regular | |
| if the rank of the matrix | |
| $$ | |
| (\partial f_j/ \partial x_i)|_{(x_1, \ldots, x_n) = (0, \ldots, 0)} | |
| $$ | |
| is $c$. What is the dimension of $A_\mathfrak m$ in this case? | |
| Show that the converse is false by giving an example where | |
| $A_\mathfrak m$ is regular but the rank is less than $c$; | |
| what is the dimension of $A_\mathfrak m$ in your example? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Schemes, Final Exam, Fall 2007} | |
| \label{section-final-exam-fall-2007} | |
| \noindent | |
| These were the questions in the final exam of a course on Schemes, | |
| in the Spring of 2007 at Columbia University. | |
| \begin{exercise}[Definitions] | |
| \label{exercise-definitions} | |
| Provide definitions of the following concepts. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $X$ is a {\it scheme} | |
| \item the morphism of schemes $f : X \to Y$ is {\it finite} | |
| \item the morphisms of schemes $f : X \to Y$ is {\it of finite type} | |
| \item the scheme $X$ is {\it Noetherian} | |
| \item the ${\mathcal O}_X$-module ${\mathcal L}$ on | |
| the scheme $X$ is {\it invertible} | |
| \item the {\it genus} of a nonsingular | |
| projective curve over an algebraically closed field | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-kill-global-sections} | |
| Let $X = \Spec({\mathbf Z}[x, y])$, and let ${\mathcal F}$ be a | |
| quasi-coherent | |
| ${\mathcal O}_X$-module. Suppose that ${\mathcal F}$ is zero when restricted to | |
| the | |
| standard affine open $D(x)$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that every global section $s$ of ${\mathcal F}$ is killed by some | |
| power of $x$, i.e., $x^ns = 0$ for some $n\in {\mathbf N}$. | |
| \item Do you think the same is true if we do not assume that ${\mathcal F}$ | |
| is quasi-coherent? | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-empty-fibre-empty} | |
| Suppose that $X \to \Spec(R)$ is a proper morphism and that | |
| $R$ is a discrete valuation ring with residue field $k$. Suppose that | |
| $X \times_{\Spec(R)} \Spec(k)$ is the empty scheme. Show that | |
| $X$ is the empty scheme. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-curve-p1-p1} | |
| Consider the | |
| projective\footnote{The projective embedding is | |
| $((X_0, X_1), (Y_0, Y_1))\mapsto (X_0Y_0, X_0Y_1, X_1Y_0, X_1Y_1)$ | |
| in other words $(x, y)\mapsto (1, y, x, xy)$.} variety | |
| $$ | |
| {\mathbf P}^1 \times {\mathbf P}^1 = {\mathbf P}^1_{{\mathbf C}} | |
| \times_{\Spec({\mathbf C})} {\mathbf P}^1_{\mathbf C} | |
| $$ | |
| over the field of complex numbers ${\mathbf C}$. It is covered by four affine | |
| pieces, | |
| corresponding to pairs of standard affine pieces of ${\mathbf P}^1_{\mathbf | |
| C}$. For example, | |
| suppose we use homogeneous coordinates $X_0, X_1$ on the first factor and | |
| $Y_0, Y_1$ on the second. Set $x = X_1/X_0$, and $y = Y_1/Y_0$. Then the 4 | |
| affine open pieces are the spectra of the rings | |
| $$ | |
| {\mathbf C}[x, y], \quad | |
| {\mathbf C}[x^{-1}, y], \quad | |
| {\mathbf C}[x, y^{-1}], \quad | |
| {\mathbf C}[x^{-1}, y^{-1}]. | |
| $$ | |
| Let $X \subset {\mathbf P}^1 \times {\mathbf P}^1$ be the closed subscheme | |
| which is the | |
| closure of the closed subset of the first affine piece given by the equation | |
| $$ | |
| y^3(x^4 + 1) = x^4 -1. | |
| $$ | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that $X$ is contained in the union of the first and | |
| the last of the 4 affine open pieces. | |
| \item Show that $X$ is a nonsingular projective curve. | |
| \item Consider the morphism $pr_2 : X \to {\mathbf P}^1$ (projection onto | |
| the first factor). On the first affine piece it is the map $(x, y) \mapsto x$. | |
| Briefly explain why it has degree $3$. | |
| \item Compute the ramification points and ramification indices | |
| for the map $pr_2 : X \to {\mathbf P}^1$. | |
| \item Compute the genus of $X$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-finite-type-over-Z} | |
| Let $X \to \Spec({\mathbf Z})$ be a morphism of finite type. | |
| Suppose that there is an infinite number of primes $p$ such that | |
| $X \times_{\Spec({\mathbf Z})} \Spec({\mathbf F}_p)$ is not empty. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that $X \times_{\Spec({\mathbf Z})}\Spec(\mathbf{Q})$ | |
| is not empty. | |
| \item Do you think the same is true if we replace the condition | |
| ``finite type'' by the condition ``locally of finite type''? | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Schemes, Final Exam, Spring 2009} | |
| \label{section-final-exam-spring-2009} | |
| \noindent | |
| These were the questions in the final exam of a course on Schemes, | |
| in the Spring of 2009 at Columbia University. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-Noetherian-coherent} | |
| Let $X$ be a Noetherian scheme. | |
| Let $\mathcal{F}$ be a coherent sheaf on $X$. | |
| Let $x \in X$ be a point. | |
| Assume that $\text{Supp}(\mathcal{F}) = \{ x \}$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that $x$ is a closed point of $X$. | |
| \item Show that $H^0(X, \mathcal{F})$ is not zero. | |
| \item Show that $\mathcal{F}$ is generated by global sections. | |
| \item Show that $H^p(X, \mathcal{F}) = 0$ for $p > 0$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-invertible-projective-space} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. | |
| Let $\mathbf{P}^2_k = \text{Proj}(k[X_0, X_1, X_2])$. | |
| Any invertible sheaf on $\mathbf{P}^2_k$ is isomorphic to | |
| $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_k}(n)$ for some $n \in \mathbf{Z}$. | |
| Recall that | |
| $$ | |
| \Gamma(\mathbf{P}^2_k, \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_k}(n)) = | |
| k[X_0, X_1, X_2]_n | |
| $$ | |
| is the degree $n$ part of the polynomial ring. | |
| For a quasi-coherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $\mathbf{P}^2_k$ set | |
| $\mathcal{F}(n) = | |
| \mathcal{F} | |
| \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_k}} | |
| \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_k}(n)$ | |
| as usual. | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-nonsplit-vectorbundle} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. | |
| Let $\mathcal{E}$ be a vector bundle on $\mathbf{P}^2_k$, i.e., a finite locally | |
| free $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_k}$-module. | |
| We say $\mathcal{E}$ is {\it split} if $\mathcal{E}$ is isomorphic to | |
| a direct sum invertible $\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_k}$-modules. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that $\mathcal{E}$ is split if and only if $\mathcal{E}(n)$ | |
| is split. | |
| \item Show that if $\mathcal{E}$ is split then | |
| $H^1({\mathbf{P}^2_k}, \mathcal{E}(n)) = 0$ | |
| for all $n \in \mathbf{Z}$. | |
| \item Let | |
| $$ | |
| \varphi : | |
| \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_k} | |
| \longrightarrow | |
| \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_k}(1) \oplus | |
| \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_k}(1) \oplus | |
| \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_k}(1) | |
| $$ | |
| be given by linear forms | |
| $L_0, L_1, L_2 \in \Gamma(\mathbf{P}^2_k, \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_k}(1))$. | |
| Assume $L_i \not = 0$ for some $i$. | |
| What is the condition on $L_0, L_1, L_2$ such that | |
| the cokernel of $\varphi$ is a vector bundle? | |
| Why? | |
| \item Given an example of such a $\varphi$. | |
| \item Show that $\Coker(\varphi)$ is not split (if it is | |
| a vector bundle). | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-recall-dimension-theory} | |
| Freely use the following facts on dimension theory | |
| (and add more if you need more). | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item The dimension of a scheme is the supremum of the length of chains | |
| of irreducible closed subsets. | |
| \item The dimension of a finite type scheme over a field is the maximum | |
| of the dimensions of its affine opens. | |
| \item The dimension of a Noetherian scheme is the maximum of the dimensions | |
| of its irreducible components. | |
| \item The dimension of an affine scheme | |
| coincides with the dimension of the corresponding ring. | |
| \item Let $k$ be a field and let $A$ be a finite type $k$-algebra. | |
| If $A$ is a domain, and $x \not = 0$, then $\dim(A) = \dim(A/xA) + 1$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-irreducible-fibres-same-dimension-irreducible} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. | |
| Let $X$ be a projective, reduced scheme over $k$. | |
| Let $f : X \to \mathbf{P}^1_k$ be a morphism of schemes over $k$. | |
| Assume there exists an integer $d \geq 0$ such that | |
| for every point $t \in \mathbf{P}^1_k$ the fibre $X_t = f^{-1}(t)$ | |
| is irreducible of dimension $d$. (Recall that an irreducible space is | |
| not empty.) | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that $\dim(X) = d + 1$. | |
| \item Let $X_0 \subset X$ be an irreducible component of $X$ of dimension | |
| $d + 1$. Prove that for every $t \in \mathbf{P}^1_k$ the fibre | |
| $X_{0, t}$ has dimension $d$. | |
| \item What can you conclude about $X_t$ and $X_{0, t}$ from the above? | |
| \item Show that $X$ is irreducible. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{remark} | |
| \label{remark-chi} | |
| Given a projective scheme $X$ over a field $k$ and | |
| a coherent sheaf $\mathcal{F}$ on $X$ we set | |
| $$ | |
| \chi(X, \mathcal{F}) = | |
| \sum\nolimits_{i \geq 0} (-1)^i\dim_k H^i(X, \mathcal{F}). | |
| $$ | |
| \end{remark} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-complete-intersection} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. | |
| Write $\mathbf{P}^3_k = \text{Proj}(k[X_0, X_1, X_2, X_3])$. | |
| Let $C \subset \mathbf{P}^3_k$ be a | |
| {\it type $(5, 6)$ complete intersection curve}. | |
| This means that there exist $F \in k[X_0, X_1, X_2, X_3]_5$ and | |
| $G \in k[X_0, X_1, X_2, X_3]_6$ such that | |
| $$ | |
| C = \text{Proj}(k[X_0, X_1, X_2, X_3]/(F, G)) | |
| $$ | |
| is a variety of dimension $1$. (Variety implies reduced and irreducible, | |
| but feel free to assume $C$ is nonsingular if you like.) | |
| Let $i : C \to \mathbf{P}^3_k$ be the corresponding closed immersion. | |
| Being a complete intersection also implies that | |
| $$ | |
| \xymatrix{ | |
| 0 \ar[r] & | |
| \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^3_k}(-11) | |
| \ar[r]^-{ | |
| \left( | |
| \begin{matrix} | |
| -G \\ | |
| F | |
| \end{matrix} | |
| \right) | |
| } & | |
| \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^3_k}(-5) \oplus \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^3_k}(-6) | |
| \ar[r]^-{(F, G)} & | |
| \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^3_k} \ar[r] & | |
| i_*\mathcal{O}_C \ar[r] & | |
| 0 | |
| } | |
| $$ | |
| is an exact sequence of sheaves. Please use these facts to: | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item compute $\chi(C, i^*\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^3_k}(n))$ for | |
| any $n \in \mathbf{Z}$, and | |
| \item compute the dimension of $H^1(C, \mathcal{O}_C)$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-glueing} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. | |
| Consider the rings | |
| \begin{align*} | |
| A & = k[x, y]/(xy) \\ | |
| B & = k[u, v]/(uv) \\ | |
| C & = k[t, t^{-1}] \times k[s, s^{-1}] | |
| \end{align*} | |
| and the $k$-algebra maps | |
| $$ | |
| \begin{matrix} | |
| A \longrightarrow C, & | |
| x \mapsto (t, 0), & | |
| y \mapsto (0, s) \\ | |
| B \longrightarrow C, & | |
| u \mapsto (t^{-1}, 0), & | |
| v \mapsto (0, s^{-1}) | |
| \end{matrix} | |
| $$ | |
| It is a true fact that these maps induce isomorphisms | |
| $A_{x + y} \to C$ and $B_{u + v} \to C$. Hence the maps $A \to C$ | |
| and $B \to C$ identify $\Spec(C)$ with open subsets of | |
| $\Spec(A)$ and $\Spec(B)$. Let $X$ be the scheme obtained | |
| by glueing $\Spec(A)$ and $\Spec(B)$ along $\Spec(C)$: | |
| $$ | |
| X = \Spec(A) \amalg_{\Spec(C)} \Spec(B). | |
| $$ | |
| As we saw in the course such a scheme exists and there are affine | |
| opens $\Spec(A) \subset X$ and $\Spec(B) \subset X$ | |
| whose overlap is exactly $\Spec(C)$ identified with an open of | |
| each of these using the maps above. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Why is $X$ separated? | |
| \item Why is $X$ of finite type over $k$? | |
| \item Compute $H^1(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$, or what is its dimension? | |
| \item What is a more geometric way to describe $X$? | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Schemes, Final Exam, Fall 2010} | |
| \label{section-final-exam-fall-2010} | |
| \noindent | |
| These were the questions in the final exam of a course on Schemes, | |
| in the Fall of 2010 at Columbia University. | |
| \begin{exercise}[Definitions] | |
| \label{exercise-definitions-fall-2010} | |
| Provide definitions of the following concepts. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item a separated scheme, | |
| \item a quasi-compact morphism of schemes, | |
| \item an affine morphism of schemes, | |
| \item a multiplicative subset of a ring, | |
| \item a Noetherian scheme, | |
| \item a variety. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-prime-avoidance} | |
| Prime avoidance. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Let $A$ be a ring. Let $I \subset A$ be an ideal and | |
| let $\mathfrak q_1$, $\mathfrak q_2$ be prime ideals such that | |
| $I \not \subset \mathfrak q_i$. Show that | |
| $I \not \subset \mathfrak q_1 \cup \mathfrak q_2$. | |
| \item What is a geometric interpretation of (1)? | |
| \item Let $X = \text{Proj}(S)$ for some graded ring $S$. | |
| Let $x_1, x_2 \in X$. Show that there exists a standard open | |
| $D_{+}(F)$ which contains both $x_1$ and $x_2$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-compose-affine} | |
| Why is a composition of affine morphisms affine? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Examples] | |
| \label{exercise-examples} | |
| Give examples of the following: | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item A reducible projective scheme over a field $k$. | |
| \item A scheme with 100 points. | |
| \item A non-affine morphism of schemes. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-chevalley-hilbert-nullstellensatz} | |
| Chevalley's theorem and the Hilbert Nullstellensatz. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Let $\mathfrak p \subset \mathbf{Z}[x_1, \ldots, x_n]$ | |
| be a maximal ideal. What does Chevalley's theorem imply about | |
| $\mathfrak p \cap \mathbf{Z}$? | |
| \item In turn, what does the Hilbert Nullstellensatz imply about | |
| $\kappa(\mathfrak p)$? | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-P0} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring. Let $S = A[X]$ as a graded $A$-algebra | |
| where $X$ has degree $1$. Show that $\text{Proj}(S) \cong \Spec(A)$ | |
| as schemes over $A$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-finite-is-projective} | |
| Let $A \to B$ be a finite ring map. Show that | |
| $\Spec(B)$ is a H-projective scheme over $\Spec(A)$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-not-geometrically-irreducible} | |
| Give an example of a scheme $X$ over a field $k$ such that | |
| $X$ is irreducible and such that for some finite extension $k'/k$ | |
| the base change $X_{k'} = X \times_{\Spec(k)} \Spec(k')$ | |
| is connected but reducible. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Schemes, Final Exam, Spring 2011} | |
| \label{section-final-exam-spring-2011} | |
| \noindent | |
| These were the questions in the final exam of a course on Schemes, | |
| in the Spring of 2011 at Columbia University. | |
| \begin{exercise}[Definitions] | |
| \label{exercise-definitions-spring-2011} | |
| Provide definitions of the italicized concepts. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item a {\it separated} scheme, | |
| \item a {\it universally closed} morphism of schemes, | |
| \item {\it $A$ dominates $B$} for local rings $A, B$ contained in a | |
| common field, | |
| \item the {\it dimension} of a scheme $X$, | |
| \item the {\it codimension} of an irreducible closed subscheme $Y$ | |
| of a scheme $X$, | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Results] | |
| \label{exercise-results-spring-2011} | |
| State something formally equivalent to the fact discussed | |
| in the course. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item The valuative criterion of properness for a morphism | |
| $X \to Y$ of varieties for example. | |
| \item The relationship between $\dim(X)$ and the function field | |
| $k(X)$ of $X$ for a variety $X$ over a field $k$. | |
| \item Fill in the blank: The category of nonsingular projective curves over | |
| $k$ and nonconstant morphisms is anti-equivalent to $\ldots\ldots\ldots$. | |
| \item Noether normalization. | |
| \item Jacobian criterion. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-genus-plane-curve} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. | |
| Let $F \in k[X_0, X_1, X_2]$ be a homogeneous form of degree $d$. | |
| Assume that $C = V_{+}(F) \subset \mathbf{P}^2_k$ is a smooth curve over $k$. | |
| Denote $i : C \to \mathbf{P}^2_k$ the corresponding closed immersion. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that there is a short exact sequence | |
| $$ | |
| 0 \to \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_k}(-d) | |
| \to \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_k} \to i_*\mathcal{O}_C \to 0 | |
| $$ | |
| of coherent sheaves on $\mathbf{P}^2_k$: tell me what the maps are | |
| and briefly why it is exact. | |
| \item Conclude that $H^0(C, \mathcal{O}_C) = k$. | |
| \item Compute the genus of $C$. | |
| \item Assume now that $P = (0 : 0 : 1)$ is not on $C$. Prove that | |
| $\pi : C \to \mathbf{P}^1_k$ given by $(a_0 : a_1 : a_2) \mapsto (a_0 : a_1)$ | |
| has degree $d$. | |
| \item Assume $k$ is algebraically closed, assume all ramification indices | |
| (the ``$e_i$'') are $1$ or $2$, and assume the characteristic of $k$ | |
| is not equal to $2$. How many ramification | |
| points does $\pi : C \to \mathbf{P}^1_k$ have? | |
| \item In terms of $F$, what do you think is a set of equations of | |
| the set of ramification points of $\pi$? | |
| \item Can you guess $K_C$? | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-Pic-triangle} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $X$ be a ``triangle'' over $k$, i.e., | |
| you get $X$ by glueing three copies of $\mathbf{A}^1_k$ to each other by | |
| identifying $0$ on the first copy to $1$ on the second copy, $0$ on the | |
| second copy to $1$ on the third copy, and $0$ on the third copy to $1$ on | |
| the first copy. It turns out that $X$ is isomorphic to | |
| $\Spec(k[x, y]/(xy(x + y + 1)))$; feel free to use this. | |
| Compute the Picard group of $X$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-birational-morphism-curves-ample} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $\pi : X \to Y$ be a finite birational | |
| morphism of curves with $X$ a projective nonsingular curve over $k$. | |
| It follows from the material in the course that $Y$ is a proper curve and | |
| that $\pi$ is the normalization morphism of $Y$. | |
| We have also seen in the course that there exists a dense open $V \subset Y$ | |
| such that $U = \pi^{-1}(V)$ is a dense open in $X$ and $\pi : U \to V$ | |
| is an isomorphism. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that there exists an effective Cartier divisor $D \subset X$ | |
| such that $D \subset U$ and such that $\mathcal{O}_X(D)$ is ample on $X$. | |
| \item Let $D$ be as in (1). Show that $E = \pi(D)$ is an effective Cartier | |
| divisor on $Y$. | |
| \item Briefly indicate why | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item the map $\mathcal{O}_Y \to \pi_*\mathcal{O}_X$ has a coherent cokernel | |
| $Q$ which is supported in $Y \setminus V$, and | |
| \item for every $n$ there is a corresponding map | |
| $\mathcal{O}_Y(nE) \to \pi_*\mathcal{O}_X(nD)$ | |
| whose cokernel is isomorphic to $Q$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that | |
| $\dim_k H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_X(nD)) - \dim_k H^0(Y, \mathcal{O}_Y(nE))$ | |
| is bounded (by what?) and conclude that the invertible sheaf | |
| $\mathcal{O}_Y(nE)$ has lots of sections for large $n$ (why?). | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Schemes, Final Exam, Fall 2011} | |
| \label{section-final-exam-fall-2011} | |
| \noindent | |
| These were the questions in the final exam of a course on | |
| Commutative Algebra, in the Fall of 2011 at Columbia University. | |
| \begin{exercise}[Definitions] | |
| \label{exercise-definitions-fall-2011} | |
| Provide definitions of the italicized concepts. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item a {\it Noetherian} ring, | |
| \item a {\it Noetherian} scheme, | |
| \item a {\it finite} ring homomorphism, | |
| \item a {\it finite} morphism of schemes, | |
| \item the {\it dimension} of a ring. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Results] | |
| \label{exercise-results-fall-2011} | |
| State something formally equivalent to the fact discussed | |
| in the course. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Zariski's Main Theorem. | |
| \item Noether normalization. | |
| \item Chinese remainder theorem. | |
| \item Going up for finite ring maps. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-dimension-of-ring} | |
| Let $(A, \mathfrak m, \kappa)$ be a Noetherian local ring | |
| whose residue field has characteristic not $2$. | |
| Suppose that $\mathfrak m$ is generated by three elements | |
| $x, y, z$ and that $x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = 0$ in $A$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item What are the possible values of $\dim(A)$? | |
| \item Give an example to show that each value is possible. | |
| \item Show that $A$ is a domain if $\dim(A) = 2$. | |
| (Hint: look at | |
| $\bigoplus_{n \geq 0} \mathfrak m^n/\mathfrak m^{n + 1}$.) | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-localization} | |
| Let $A$ be a ring. | |
| Let $S \subset T \subset A$ be multiplicative subsets. | |
| Assume that | |
| $$ | |
| \{\mathfrak q \mid \mathfrak q \cap S = \emptyset\} = | |
| \{\mathfrak q \mid \mathfrak q \cap T = \emptyset\}. | |
| $$ | |
| Show that $S^{-1}A \to T^{-1}A$ is an isomorphism. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-locus-of-rank-1} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let | |
| $$ | |
| V_0 = \{ A \in \text{Mat}(3 \times 3, k) \mid \text{rank}(A) = 1\} | |
| \subset \text{Mat}(3 \times 3, k) = k^9. | |
| $$ | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that $V_0$ is the set of closed points of a | |
| (Zariski) locally closed subset $V \subset \mathbf{A}^9_k$. | |
| \item Is $V$ irreducible? | |
| \item What is $\dim(V)$? | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-not-complete-intersection} | |
| Prove that the ideal $(x^2, xy, y^2)$ in $\mathbf{C}[x, y]$ | |
| cannot be generated by $2$ elements. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-finite-projection} | |
| Let $f \in \mathbf{C}[x, y]$ be a nonconstant polynomial. | |
| Show that for some $\alpha, \beta \in \mathbf{C}$ the | |
| $\mathbf{C}$-algebra map | |
| $$ | |
| \mathbf{C}[t] \longrightarrow \mathbf{C}[x, y]/(f),\quad | |
| t \longmapsto \alpha x + \beta y | |
| $$ | |
| is finite. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-union-of-two-affines} | |
| Show that given finitely many points $p_1, \ldots, p_n \in \mathbf{C}^2$ | |
| the scheme $\mathbf{A}^2_\mathbf{C} \setminus \{p_1, \ldots, p_n\}$ | |
| is a union of two affine opens. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-surjection-A1-P1} | |
| Show that there exists a surjective morphism of schemes | |
| $\mathbf{A}^1_\mathbf{C} \to \mathbf{P}^1_\mathbf{C}$. | |
| (Surjective just means surjective on underlying sets of points.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-almost-surjective} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $A \subset B$ be an | |
| extension of domains which are both finite type $k$-algebras. | |
| Prove that the image of $\Spec(B) \to \Spec(A)$ | |
| contains a nonempty open subset of $\Spec(A)$ using the following steps: | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Prove it if $A \to B$ is also finite. | |
| \item Prove it in case the fraction field of $B$ is a finite extension | |
| of the fraction field of $A$. | |
| \item Reduce the statement to the previous case. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Schemes, Final Exam, Fall 2013} | |
| \label{section-final-exam-fall-2013} | |
| \noindent | |
| These were the questions in the final exam of a course on | |
| Commutative Algebra, in the Fall of 2013 at Columbia University. | |
| \begin{exercise}[Definitions] | |
| \label{exercise-definitions-fall-2013} | |
| Provide definitions of the italicized concepts. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item a {\it radical ideal} of a ring, | |
| \item a {\it finite type} ring homomorphism, | |
| \item a {\it differential a la Weil}, | |
| \item a {\it scheme}. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Results] | |
| \label{exercise-results-fall-2013} | |
| State something formally equivalent to the fact discussed | |
| in the course. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item result on hilbert polynomials of graded modules. | |
| \item dimension of a Noetherian local ring $(R, \mathfrak m)$ and | |
| $\bigoplus_{n \geq 0} \mathfrak m^n/\mathfrak m^{n + 1}$. | |
| \item Riemann-Roch. | |
| \item Clifford's theorem. | |
| \item Chevalley's theorem. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-surjective-after-localization} | |
| Let $A \to B$ be a ring map. Let $S \subset A$ be a multiplicative subset. | |
| Assume that $A \to B$ is of finite type and $S^{-1}A \to S^{-1}B$ is | |
| surjective. Show that there exists an $f \in S$ such that $A_f \to B_f$ | |
| is surjective. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-injective-local-ring-map-not-surjective} | |
| Give an example of an injective local homomorphism $A \to B$ | |
| of local rings, such that $\Spec(B) \to \Spec(A)$ is not surjective. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{situation}[Notation plane curve] | |
| \label{situation-curve-in-the-plane} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let | |
| $F(X_0, X_1, X_2) \in k[X_0, X_1, X_2]$ be an irreducible polynomial | |
| homogeneous of degree $d$. We let | |
| $$ | |
| D = V(F) \subset \mathbf{P}^2 | |
| $$ | |
| be the projective plane curve given by the vanishing of $F$. | |
| Set $x = X_1/X_0$ and $y = X_2/X_0$ and | |
| $f(x, y) = X_0^{-d}F(X_0, X_1, X_2) = F(1, x, y)$. | |
| We denote $K$ the fraction field of the domain $k[x, y]/(f)$. | |
| We let $C$ be the abstract curve corresponding to $K$. | |
| Recall (from the lectures) that there is a surjective map $C \to D$ | |
| which is bijective over the nonsingular locus of $D$ and an | |
| isomorphism if $D$ is nonsingular. | |
| Set $f_x = \partial f/\partial x$ and $f_y = \partial f/\partial y$. | |
| Finally, we denote $\omega = \text{d}x/f_y = - \text{d}y/f_x$ the | |
| element of $\Omega_{K/k}$ discussed in the lectures. | |
| Denote $K_C$ the divisor of zeros and poles of $\omega$. | |
| \end{situation} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-node-in-the-plane} | |
| In Situation \ref{situation-curve-in-the-plane} assume | |
| $d \geq 3$ and that the curve $D$ has exactly one singular point, | |
| namely $P = (1 : 0 : 0)$. Assume further that we have the expansion | |
| $$ | |
| f(x, y) = xy + h.o.t | |
| $$ | |
| around $P = (0, 0)$. Then $C$ has two points $v$ and $w$ lying over | |
| $P$ characterized by | |
| $$ | |
| v(x) = 1, v(y) > 1 | |
| \quad\text{and}\quad | |
| w(x) > 1, w(y) = 1 | |
| $$ | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that the element | |
| $\omega = \text{d}x/f_y = - \text{d}y/f_x$ of $\Omega_{K/k}$ | |
| has a first order pole at both $v$ and $w$. (The behaviour of | |
| $\omega$ at nonsingular points is as discussed in the lectures.) | |
| \item In the lectures we have shown that $\omega$ vanishes to order | |
| $d - 3$ at the divisor $X_0 = 0$ pulled back to $C$ under the map | |
| $C \to D$. Combined with the information of (1) what is the degree | |
| of the divisor of zeros and poles of $\omega$ on $C$? | |
| \item What is the genus of the curve $C$? | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-smooth-plane-curve-linear-system} | |
| In Situation \ref{situation-curve-in-the-plane} assume $d = 5$ | |
| and that the curve $C = D$ is nonsingular. In the lectures we have shown | |
| that the genus of $C$ is $6$ and that the linear system $K_C$ is given by | |
| $$ | |
| L(K_C) = \{h\omega \mid h \in k[x, y],\ \deg(h) \leq 2\} | |
| $$ | |
| where $\deg$ indicates total degree\footnote{We get $\leq 2$ because | |
| $d - 3 = 5 - 3 = 2$.}. Let $P_1, P_2, P_3, P_4, P_5 \in D$ | |
| be pairwise distinct points lying in the affine open $X_0 \not = 0$. We denote | |
| $\sum P_i = P_1 + P_2 + P_3 + P_4 + P_5$ the corresponding divisor of $C$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Describe $L(K_C - \sum P_i)$ in terms of polynomials. | |
| \item What are the possibilities for $l(\sum P_i)$? | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-rational-curve-high-degree} | |
| Write down an $F$ as in Situation \ref{situation-curve-in-the-plane} | |
| with $d = 100$ such that the genus of $C$ is $0$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-high-degree-curve-quadratic-equation} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $K/k$ be | |
| finitely generated field extension of transcendence degree $1$. | |
| Let $C$ be the abstract curve corresponding to $K$. | |
| Let $V \subset K$ be a $g^r_d$ and let $\Phi : C \to \mathbf{P}^r$ | |
| be the corresponding morphism. Show that the image of $C$ | |
| is contained in a quadric\footnote{A quadric is a degree $2$ hypersurface, | |
| i.e., the zero set in $\mathbf{P}^r$ of a degree $2$ homogeneous | |
| polynomial.} if $V$ is a complete linear | |
| system and $d$ is large enough relative to the genus of $C$. | |
| (Extra credit: good bound on the degree needed.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-surjective-map-a2-p2} | |
| Notation as in Situation \ref{situation-curve-in-the-plane}. | |
| Let $U \subset \mathbf{P}^2_k$ be the open subscheme | |
| whose complement is $D$. Describe the $k$-algebra | |
| $A = \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2_k}(U)$. Give an upper bound for the | |
| number of generators of $A$ as a $k$-algebra. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Schemes, Final Exam, Spring 2014} | |
| \label{section-final-exam-spring-2014} | |
| \noindent | |
| These were the questions in the final exam of a course on | |
| Schemes, in the Spring of 2014 at Columbia University. | |
| \begin{exercise}[Definitions] | |
| \label{exercise-definitions-spring-2014} | |
| Let $(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$ be a scheme. Provide definitions of the | |
| italicized concepts. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item the {\it local ring of $X$ at a point $x$}, | |
| \item a {\it quasi-coherent} sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules, | |
| \item a {\it coherent} sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules (please | |
| assume $X$ is locally Noetherian, | |
| \item an {\it affine open} of $X$, | |
| \item a {\it finite morphism of schemes} $X \to Y$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Theorems] | |
| \label{exercise-results-spring-2014} | |
| Precisely state a nontrivial fact discussed in the lectures related | |
| to each item. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item on birational invariance of pluri-genera of varieties, | |
| \item being an affine morphism is a local property, | |
| \item the topology of a scheme theoretic fibre of a morphism, and | |
| \item valuative criterion of properness. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-miss-curve} | |
| Let $X = \mathbf{A}^2_\mathbf{C}$ where $\mathbf{C}$ is the field | |
| of complex numbers. A {\it line} will mean a closed | |
| subscheme of $X$ defined by one linear equation $ax + by + c = 0$ for | |
| some $a, b, c \in \mathbf{C}$ with $(a, b) \not = (0, 0)$. | |
| A {\it curve} will mean an irreducible (so nonempty) closed subscheme | |
| $C \subset X$ of dimension $1$. | |
| A {\it quadric} will mean a curve defined by one | |
| quadratic equation $ax^2 + bxy + cy^2 + dx + ey + f = 0$ | |
| for some $a, b, c, d, e, f \in \mathbf{C}$ and | |
| $(a, b, c) \not = (0, 0, 0)$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Find a curve $C$ such that every line has nonempty intersection with $C$. | |
| \item Find a curve $C$ such that every line and every quadric has nonempty | |
| intersection with $C$. | |
| \item Show that for every curve $C$ there exists another curve | |
| such that $C \cap C' = \emptyset$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-normal-bundle-exceptional-curve} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $b : X \to \mathbf{A}^2_k$ be the blow | |
| up of the affine plane in the origin. In other words, if | |
| $\mathbf{A}^2_k = \Spec(k[x, y])$, then | |
| $X = \text{Proj}(\bigoplus_{n \geq 0} \mathfrak m^n)$ | |
| where $\mathfrak m = (x, y) \subset k[x, y]$. | |
| Prove the following statements | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item the scheme theoretic fibre $E$ of $b$ over the origin | |
| is isomorphic to $\mathbf{P}^1_k$, | |
| \item $E$ is an effective Cartier divisor on $X$, | |
| \item the restriction of $\mathcal{O}_X(-E)$ | |
| to $E$ is a line bundle of degree $1$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| (Recall that $\mathcal{O}_X(-E)$ is the ideal sheaf of $E$ in $X$.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-surjective-map-affine-variety-projective-variety} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $X$ be a projective variety over $k$. | |
| Show there exists an affine variety $U$ over $k$ and a surjective | |
| morphism of varieties $U \to X$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-vandermonde} | |
| Let $k$ be a field of characteristic $p > 0$ different from $2,3$. | |
| Consider the closed subscheme $X$ of $\mathbf{P}^n_k$ defined by | |
| $$ | |
| \sum\nolimits_{i = 0, \ldots, n} X_i = 0,\quad | |
| \sum\nolimits_{i = 0, \ldots, n} X_i^2 = 0,\quad | |
| \sum\nolimits_{i = 0, \ldots, n} X_i^3 = 0 | |
| $$ | |
| For which pairs $(n, p)$ is this variety singular? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Commutative Algebra, Final Exam, Fall 2016} | |
| \label{section-final-exam-fall-2016} | |
| \noindent | |
| These were the questions in the final exam of a course on | |
| Commutative Algebra, in the Fall of 2016 at Columbia University. | |
| \begin{exercise}[Definitions] | |
| \label{exercise-definitions-fall-2016} | |
| Let $R$ be a ring. | |
| Provide definitions of the italicized concepts. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item the {\it local ring of $R$ at a prime $\mathfrak p$}, | |
| \item a {\it finite} $R$-module, | |
| \item a {\it finitely presented} $R$-module, | |
| \item $R$ is {\it regular}, | |
| \item $R$ is {\it catenary}, | |
| \item $R$ is {\it Cohen-Macaulay}. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Theorems] | |
| \label{exercise-results-fall-2016} | |
| Precisely state a nontrivial fact discussed in the lectures related | |
| to each item. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item regular rings, | |
| \item associated primes of Cohen-Macaulay modules, | |
| \item dimension of a finite type domain over a field, and | |
| \item Chevalley's theorem. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-finite-injective} | |
| Let $A \to B$ be a ring map such that | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $A$ is local with maximal ideal $\mathfrak m$, | |
| \item $A \to B$ is a finite\footnote{Recall that this means $B$ | |
| is finite as an $A$-module.} ring map, | |
| \item $A \to B$ is injective (we think of $A$ as a subring of $B$). | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| Show that there is a prime ideal $\mathfrak q \subset B$ with | |
| $\mathfrak m = A \cap \mathfrak q$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-find-components} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $R = k[x, y, z, w]$. | |
| Consider the ideal $I = (xy, xz, xw)$. | |
| What are the irreducible components of | |
| $V(I) \subset \Spec(R)$ and what are their dimensions? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-no-nonconstant-morphism} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $A = k[x, x^{-1}]$ and $B = k[y]$. | |
| Show that any $k$-algebra map $\varphi : A \to B$ maps $x$ to a constant. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-regular-over-Z} | |
| Consider the ring $R = \mathbf{Z}[x, y]/(xy - 7)$. | |
| Prove that $R$ is regular. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \noindent | |
| Given a Noetherian local ring $(R, \mathfrak m, \kappa)$ | |
| for $n \geq 0$ we let | |
| $\varphi_R(n) = \dim_\kappa(\mathfrak m^n/\mathfrak m^{n + 1})$. | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-hilbert-function-allowed} | |
| Does there exist a Noetherian local ring $R$ with | |
| $\varphi_R(n) = n + 1$ for all $n \geq 0$? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-hilbert-function-prohibited} | |
| Let $R$ be a Noetherian local ring. | |
| Suppose that $\varphi_R(0) = 1$, $\varphi_R(1) = 3$, | |
| $\varphi_R(2) = 5$. Show that $\varphi_R(3) \leq 7$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Schemes, Final Exam, Spring 2017} | |
| \label{section-final-exam-spring-2017} | |
| \noindent | |
| These were the questions in the final exam of a course on schemes, | |
| in the Spring of 2017 at Columbia University. | |
| \begin{exercise}[Definitions] | |
| \label{exercise-definitions-spring-2017} | |
| Let $f : X \to Y$ be a morphism of schemes. | |
| Provide brief definitions of the italicized concepts. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item the {\it scheme theoretic fibre} of $f$ at $y \in Y$, | |
| \item $f$ is a {\it finite morphism}, | |
| \item a {\it quasi-coherent} $\mathcal{O}_X$-module, | |
| \item $X$ is {\it variety}, | |
| \item $f$ is a {\it smooth morphism}, | |
| \item $f$ is a {\it proper morphism}. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Theorems] | |
| \label{exercise-results-spring-2017} | |
| Precisely but briefly state a nontrivial fact discussed in the lectures | |
| related to each item. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item pushforward of quasi-coherent sheaves, | |
| \item cohomology of coherent sheaves on projective varieties, | |
| \item Serre duality for a projective scheme over a field, and | |
| \item Riemann-Hurwitz. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-compute-degree} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. | |
| Let $\ell > 100$ be a prime number different from the | |
| characteristic of $k$. Let $X$ be the nonsingular projective model | |
| of the affine curve given by the equation | |
| $$ | |
| y^\ell = x(x - 1)^3 | |
| $$ | |
| in $\mathbf{A}^2_k$. Answer the following questions: | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item What is the genus of $X$? | |
| \item Give an upper bound for the | |
| gonality\footnote{The gonality is the smallest degree of a nonconstant | |
| morphism from $X$ to $\mathbf{P}^1_k$.} of $X$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-count-components} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $X$ be a reduced, | |
| projective scheme over $k$ all of whose irreducible components | |
| have the same dimension $1$. Let $\omega_{X/k}$ be the | |
| relative dualizing module. Show that if | |
| $\dim_k H^1(X, \omega_{X/k}) > 1$, then $X$ is disconnected. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-sections-L-L-inverse} | |
| Give an example of a scheme $X$ and a nontrivial invertible | |
| $\mathcal{O}_X$-module $\mathcal{L}$ such that both | |
| $H^0(X, \mathcal{L})$ and $H^0(X, \mathcal{L}^{\otimes -1})$ | |
| are nonzero. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-in-product} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $g \geq 3$. | |
| Let $X$ and $X'$ be smooth projective curves over $k$ of | |
| genus $g$ and $g + 1$. Let $Y \subset X \times X'$ | |
| be a curve such that the projections $Y \to X$ and $Y \to X'$ | |
| are nonconstant. Prove that the nonsingular projective model | |
| of $Y$ has genus $\geq 2g + 1$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-finitely-many} | |
| Let $k$ be a finite field. Let $g > 1$. Sketch a proof of the following: | |
| there are only a finite number of isomorphism classes of | |
| smooth projective curves over $k$ of genus $g$. | |
| (You will get credit for even just trying to answer this.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Commutative Algebra, Final Exam, Fall 2017} | |
| \label{section-final-exam-fall-2017} | |
| \noindent | |
| These were the questions in the final exam of a course on commutative algebra, | |
| in the Fall of 2017 at Columbia University. | |
| \begin{exercise}[Definitions] | |
| \label{exercise-definitions-fall-2017} | |
| Provide brief definitions of the italicized concepts. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item the {\it left adjoint} of a functor $F : \mathcal{A} \to \mathcal{B}$, | |
| \item the {\it transcendence degree} of an extension $L/K$ of fields, | |
| \item a {\it regular function} on a classical affine variety | |
| $X \subset k^n$, | |
| \item a {\it sheaf} on a topological space, | |
| \item a {\it local ring}, and | |
| \item a morphism of schemes $f : X \to Y$ being {\it affine}. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Theorems] | |
| \label{exercise-results-fall-2017} | |
| Precisely but briefly state a nontrivial fact discussed in the lectures | |
| related to each item (if there is more than one then just pick | |
| one of them). | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Yoneda lemma, | |
| \item Mayer-Vietoris, | |
| \item dimension and cohomology, | |
| \item Hilbert polynomial, and | |
| \item duality for projective space. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-compute-dimension} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Consider the closed subset | |
| $X$ of $k^5$ with Zariski topology and coordinates $x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4, x_5$ | |
| given by the equations | |
| $$ | |
| x_1^2 - x_4 = 0,\quad | |
| x_2^5 - x_5 = 0,\quad | |
| x_3^2 + x_3 + x_4 + x_5 = 0 | |
| $$ | |
| What is the dimension of $X$ and why? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-can-there-be} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $X = \mathbf{P}^1_k$ be the projective space | |
| of dimension $1$ over $k$. Let $\mathcal{E}$ be a finite locally free | |
| $\mathcal{O}_X$-module. For $d \in \mathbf{Z}$ denote | |
| $\mathcal{E}(d) = \mathcal{E} \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} \mathcal{O}_X(d)$ | |
| the $d$th Serre twist of $\mathcal{E}$ and | |
| $h^i(X, \mathcal{E}(d)) = \dim_k H^i(X, \mathcal{E}(d))$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Why is there no $\mathcal{E}$ with | |
| $h^0(X, \mathcal{E}) = 5$ and $h^0(X, \mathcal{E}(1)) = 4$? | |
| \item Why is there no $\mathcal{E}$ with | |
| $h^1(X, \mathcal{E}(1)) = 5$ and $h^1(X, \mathcal{E}) = 4$? | |
| \item For which $a \in \mathbf{Z}$ can there exist a vector bundle | |
| $\mathcal{E}$ on $X$ with | |
| $$ | |
| \begin{matrix} | |
| h^0(X, \mathcal{E})\phantom{(1)} = 1 & | |
| h^1(X, \mathcal{E})\phantom{(1)} = 1 \\ | |
| h^0(X, \mathcal{E}(1)) = 2 & | |
| h^1(X, \mathcal{E}(1)) = 0 \\ | |
| h^0(X, \mathcal{E}(2)) = 4 & | |
| h^1(X, \mathcal{E}(2)) = a | |
| \end{matrix} | |
| $$ | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| Partial answers are welcomed and encouraged. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-banana} | |
| Let $X$ be a topological space which is the union | |
| $X = Y \cup Z$ of two closed | |
| subsets $Y$ and $Z$ whose intersection is denoted $W = Y \cap Z$. | |
| Denote $i : Y \to X$, $j : Z \to X$, and $k : W \to X$ the inclusion | |
| maps. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that there is a short exact sequence of sheaves | |
| $$ | |
| 0 \to \underline{\mathbf{Z}}_X \to | |
| i_*(\underline{\mathbf{Z}}_Y) \oplus | |
| j_*(\underline{\mathbf{Z}}_Z) \to | |
| k_*(\underline{\mathbf{Z}}_W) \to 0 | |
| $$ | |
| where $\underline{\mathbf{Z}}_X$ denotes the constant sheaf | |
| with value $\mathbf{Z}$ on $X$, etc. | |
| \item What can you conclude about the relationship between the | |
| cohomology groups of $X$, $Y$, $Z$, $W$ with $\mathbf{Z}$-coefficients? | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-cohomology-infinite-punctured} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $A = k[x_1, x_2, x_3, \ldots]$ be the polynomial | |
| ring in infinitely many variables. | |
| Denote $\mathfrak m$ the maximal ideal of $A$ generated by | |
| all the variables. Let $X = \Spec(A)$ and $U = X \setminus \{\mathfrak m\}$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show $H^1(U, \mathcal{O}_U) = 0$. Hint: {\v C}ech | |
| cohomology computation. | |
| \item What is your guess for $H^i(U, \mathcal{O}_U)$ for $i \geq 1$? | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-principal} | |
| Let $A$ be a local ring. Let $a \in A$ be a nonzerodivisor. | |
| Let $I, J \subset A$ be ideals such that $IJ = (a)$. Show that | |
| the ideal $I$ is principal, i.e., generated by one element | |
| (which will turn out to be a nonzerodivisor). | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Schemes, Final Exam, Spring 2018} | |
| \label{section-final-exam-spring-2018} | |
| \noindent | |
| These were the questions in the final exam of a course on schemes, | |
| in the Spring of 2018 at Columbia University. | |
| \begin{exercise}[Definitions] | |
| \label{exercise-definitions-spring-2018} | |
| Provide brief definitions of the italicized concepts. | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. | |
| Let $X$ be a projective curve over $k$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item a {\it smooth} algebra over $k$, | |
| \item the {\it degree} of an invertible $\mathcal{O}_X$-module on $X$, | |
| \item the {\it genus} of $X$, | |
| \item the {\it Weil divisor class group} of $X$, | |
| \item $X$ is {\it hyperelliptic}, and | |
| \item the {\it intersection number} | |
| of two curves on a smooth projective surface over $k$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Theorems] | |
| \label{exercise-results-spring-2018} | |
| Precisely but briefly state a nontrivial fact discussed in the lectures | |
| related to each item (if there is more than one then just pick | |
| one of them). | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Riemann-Hurwitz theorem, | |
| \item Clifford's theorem, | |
| \item factorization of maps between smooth projective surfaces, | |
| \item Hodge index theorem, and | |
| \item Riemann hypothesis for curves over finite fields. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-hyperelliptic} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $X \subset \mathbf{P}^3_k$ | |
| be a smooth curve of degree $d$ and genus $\geq 2$. Assume $X$ | |
| is not contained in a plane and that there is | |
| a line $\ell$ in $\mathbf{P}^3_k$ meeting $X$ in $d - 2$ points. | |
| Show that $X$ is hyperelliptic. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-singular} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $X$ be a projective | |
| curve with pairwise distinct singular points $p_1, \ldots, p_n$. | |
| Explain why the genus of the normalization of $X$ is at most | |
| $-n + \dim_k H^1(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-how-many-blowups} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $X = \Spec(k[x, y])$ be affine $2$ space. | |
| Let | |
| $$ | |
| I = (x^3, x^2y, xy^2, y^3) \subset k[x, y]. | |
| $$ | |
| Let $Y \subset X$ be the closed subscheme corresponding to $I$. | |
| Let $b : X' \to X$ be the blowing up of the ideal $(x, y)$, i.e., | |
| the blow up of affine space at the origin. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that the scheme theoretic inverse image $b^{-1}Y \subset X'$ | |
| is an effective Cartier divisor. | |
| \item Given an example of an ideal $J \subset k[x, y]$ | |
| with $I \subset J \subset (x, y)$ such that if $Z \subset X$ | |
| is the closed subscheme corresponding to $J$, then the scheme theoretic | |
| inverse image $b^{-1}Z$ is not an effective Cartier divisor. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-rational-surface} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Consider the following | |
| types of surfaces | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $S = C_1 \times C_2$ where $C_1$ and $C_2$ are smooth projective curves, | |
| \item $S = C_1 \times C_2$ where $C_1$ and $C_2$ are smooth projective curves | |
| and the genus of $C_1$ is $> 0$, | |
| \item $S \subset \mathbf{P}^3_k$ is a hypersurface of degree $4$, and | |
| \item $S \subset \mathbf{P}^3_k$ is a smooth hypersurface of degree $4$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| For each type briefly indicate why or why not the class of surfaces of | |
| this type contains rational surfaces. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-self-square-line} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $S \subset \mathbf{P}^3_k$ | |
| be a smooth hypersurface of degree $d$. Assume that $S$ contains a | |
| line $\ell$. What is the self square of $\ell$ viewed as a divisor on $S$? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Commutative Algebra, Final Exam, Fall 2019} | |
| \label{section-final-exam-fall-2019} | |
| \noindent | |
| These were the questions in the final exam of a course on commutative algebra, | |
| in the Fall of 2019 at Columbia University. | |
| \begin{exercise}[Definitions] | |
| \label{exercise-definitions-fall-2019} | |
| Provide brief definitions of the italicized concepts. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item a {\it constructible subset} of a Noetherian topological space, | |
| \item the {\it localization} of an $R$-module $M$ at a prime $\mathfrak p$, | |
| \item the {\it length} of a module over a Noetherian local ring | |
| $(A, \mathfrak m, \kappa)$, | |
| \item a {\it projective module} over a ring $R$, and | |
| \item a {\it Cohen-Macaulay} module over a | |
| Noetherian local ring $(A, \mathfrak m, \kappa)$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Theorems] | |
| \label{exercise-results-fall-2019} | |
| Precisely but briefly state a nontrivial fact discussed in the lectures | |
| related to each item (if there is more than one then just pick | |
| one of them). | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item images of constructible sets, | |
| \item Hilbert Nullstellensatz, | |
| \item dimension of finite type algebras over fields, | |
| \item Noether normalization, and | |
| \item regular local rings. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \noindent | |
| For a ring $R$ and an ideal $I \subset R$ recall that $V(I)$ | |
| denotes the set of $\mathfrak p \in \Spec(R)$ with $I \subset \mathfrak p$. | |
| \begin{exercise}[Making primes] | |
| \label{exercise-infinitely-many-primes} | |
| Construct infinitely many distinct prime ideals | |
| $\mathfrak p \subset \mathbf{C}[x, y]$ | |
| such that $V(\mathfrak p)$ contains $(x, y)$ and $(x - 1, y - 1)$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[No prime] | |
| \label{exercise-no-prime} | |
| Let $R = \mathbf{C}[x, y, z]/(xy)$. Argue briefly there does not exist | |
| a prime ideal $\mathfrak p \subset R$ such that | |
| $V(\mathfrak p)$ contains $(x, y - 1, z - 5)$ and $(x - 1, y, z - 7)$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Frobenius] | |
| \label{exercise-frobenius} | |
| Let $p$ be a prime number (you may assume $p = 2$ to simplify the formulas). | |
| Let $R$ be a ring such that $p = 0$ in $R$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that the map $F : R \to R$, $x \mapsto x^p$ is a ring homomorphism. | |
| \item Show that $\Spec(F) : \Spec(R) \to \Spec(R)$ is the identity map. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \noindent | |
| Recall that a {\it specialization} $x \leadsto y$ of points of a topological | |
| space simply means $y$ is in the closure of $x$. We say $x \leadsto y$ is an | |
| {\it immediate specialization} if there does not exist a $z$ different | |
| from $x$ and $y$ such that $x \leadsto z$ and $z \leadsto y$. | |
| \begin{exercise}[Dimension] | |
| \label{exercise-dimension} | |
| Suppose we have a sober topological space $X$ containing $5$ distinct points | |
| $x, y, z, u, v$ having the following specializations | |
| $$ | |
| \xymatrix{ | |
| x \ar[d] \ar[r] & u & v \ar[l] \ar[dl] \\ | |
| y \ar[r] & z | |
| } | |
| $$ | |
| What is the minimal dimension such an $X$ can have? If $X$ is the spectrum | |
| of a finite type algebra over a field and $x \leadsto u$ is an | |
| immediate specialization, what can you say about the | |
| specialization $v \leadsto z$? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Tor computation] | |
| \label{exercise-tor-computation} | |
| Let $R = \mathbf{C}[x, y, z]$. Let $M = R/(x, z)$ and $N = R/(y, z)$. | |
| For which $i \in \mathbf{Z}$ is $\text{Tor}_i^R(M, N)$ nonzero? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-depth-goes-up} | |
| Let $A \to B$ be a flat local homomorphism of local Noetherian rings. | |
| Show that if $A$ has depth $k$, then $B$ has depth at least $k$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Algebraic Geometry, Final Exam, Spring 2020} | |
| \label{section-final-exam-spring-2020} | |
| \noindent | |
| These were the questions in the final exam of a course on Algebraic Geometry, | |
| in the Spring of 2020 at Columbia University. | |
| \begin{exercise}[Definitions] | |
| \label{exercise-definitions-spring-2020} | |
| Provide brief definitions of the italicized concepts. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item a {\it scheme}, | |
| \item a {\it morphism of schemes}, | |
| \item a {\it quasi-coherent module} on a scheme, | |
| \item a {\it variety} over a field $k$, | |
| \item a {\it curve} over a field $k$, | |
| \item a {\it finite morphism} of schemes, | |
| \item the {\it cohomology} of a sheaf of abelian groups $\mathcal{F}$ | |
| over a topological space $X$, | |
| \item a {\it dualizing sheaf} on a scheme $X$ of dimension $d$ | |
| proper over a field $k$, and | |
| \item a {\it rational map} from a variety $X$ to a variety $Y$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Theorems] | |
| \label{exercise-results-spring-2020} | |
| Precisely but briefly state a nontrivial fact discussed in the lectures | |
| related to each item (if there is more than one then just pick | |
| one of them). | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item cohomology of abelian sheaves on a Noetherian topological space | |
| $X$ of dimension $d$, | |
| \item sheaf of differentials $\Omega^1_{X/k}$ of a smooth variety | |
| over a field $k$, | |
| \item dualizing sheaf $\omega_X$ of a smooth projective variety $X$ | |
| over the field $k$, | |
| \item a smooth proper | |
| genus $0$ curve over an algebraically closed field $k$, and | |
| \item the genus of a plane curve of degree $d$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-coh-P1-infty-doubled} | |
| Let $k$ be a field. Let $X$ be a scheme over $k$. Assume $X = X_1 \cup X_2$ | |
| is an open covering with $X_1$, $X_2$ both isomorphic to $\mathbf{P}^1_k$ | |
| and $X_1 \cap X_2$ isomorphic to $\mathbf{A}^1_k$. (Such a scheme exists, | |
| for example you can take $\mathbf{P}^1_k$ with $\infty$ doubled.) | |
| Show that $\dim_k H^1(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$ is infinite. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-no-morphism} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $Y$ be a smooth projective | |
| curve of genus $10$. Find a good lower bound for the | |
| genus of a smooth projective | |
| curve $X$ such that there exists a nonconstant morphism $f : X \to Y$ | |
| which is not an isomorphism. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-element-order-n-in-pic} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field of characteristic $0$. | |
| Let | |
| $$ | |
| X : T_0^d + T_1^d - T_2^d = 0 \subset \mathbf{P}^2_k | |
| $$ | |
| be the Fermat curve of degree $d \geq 3$. Consider the closed points | |
| $p = [1 : 0 : 1]$ and $q = [0 : 1 : 1]$ on $X$. Set $D = [p] - [q]$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that $D$ is nontrivial in the Weil divisor class group. | |
| \item Show that $d D$ is trivial in the Weil divisor class group. | |
| (Hint: try to show that both $d[p]$ and $d[q]$ are the intersection | |
| of $X$ with a line in the plane.) | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-number-equations} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Consider the $2$-uple embedding | |
| $$ | |
| \varphi : \mathbf{P}^2 \longrightarrow \mathbf{P}^5 | |
| $$ | |
| In terms of the material/notation in the lectures this is the morphism | |
| $$ | |
| \varphi = \varphi_{\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2}(2)} : | |
| \mathbf{P}^2 | |
| \longrightarrow | |
| \mathbf{P}(\Gamma(\mathbf{P}^2, \mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^2}(2))) | |
| $$ | |
| In terms of homogeneous coordinates it is given by | |
| $$ | |
| [a_0 : a_1 : a_2] \longmapsto | |
| [a_0^2 : a_0a_1 : a_0a_2 : a_1^2 : a_1a_2 : a_2^2] | |
| $$ | |
| It is a closed immersion (please just use this). | |
| Let $I \subset k[T_0, \ldots, T_5]$ be the homogeneous ideal | |
| of $\varphi(\mathbf{P}^2)$, i.e., the elements of the | |
| homogeneous part $I_d$ are the | |
| homogeneous polynomials $F(T_0, \ldots, T_5)$ of degree $d$ which | |
| restrict to zero on the closed subscheme $\varphi(\mathbf{P}^2)$. | |
| Compute $\dim_k I_d$ as a function of $d$. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise} | |
| \label{exercise-dualizing-sheaf-rank-1} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. Let $X$ be a proper scheme of | |
| dimension $d$ over $k$ with dualizing module $\omega_X$. | |
| You are given the following information: | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item $\text{Ext}^i_X(\mathcal{F}, \omega_X) \times | |
| H^{d - i}(X, \mathcal{F}) \to H^d(X, \omega_X) \xrightarrow{t} k$ | |
| is nondegenerate for all $i$ and for all coherent $\mathcal{O}_X$-modules | |
| $\mathcal{F}$, and | |
| \item $\omega_X$ is finite locally free of some rank $r$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| Show that $r = 1$. (Hint: see what happens if you take $\mathcal{F}$ | |
| a suitable module supported at a closed point.) | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Commutative Algebra, Final Exam, Fall 2021} | |
| \label{section-final-exam-fall-2021} | |
| \noindent | |
| These were the questions in the final exam of a course on commutative algebra, | |
| in the Fall of 2021 at Columbia University. | |
| \begin{exercise}[Definitions] | |
| \label{exercise-definitions-fall-2021} | |
| Provide brief definitions of the italicized concepts. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item a {\it multiplicative subset} of a ring $A$, | |
| \item an {\it Artinian ring} $A$, | |
| \item the {\it spectrum of a ring} $A$ as a topological space, | |
| \item a {\it flat ring map} $A \to B$, | |
| \item the {\it height} of a prime ideal $\mathfrak p$ in $A$, and | |
| \item the functors {\it $\text{Tor}^A_i(-, -)$} over a ring $A$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Theorems] | |
| \label{exercise-results-fall-2021} | |
| Precisely but briefly state a nontrivial fact discussed in the lectures | |
| related to each item (if there is more than one then just pick | |
| one of them). | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Artinian rings, | |
| \item flatness and prime ideals, | |
| \item lengths of $A/\mathfrak m^n$ for $(A, \mathfrak m)$ Noetherian local, | |
| \item the dimension formula for universally catenary Noetherian rings, | |
| \item completion of a Noetherian local ring, and | |
| \item Matlis duality for Artinian local rings. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Units] | |
| \label{exercise-simple-units} | |
| What is the structure of the group of units of $\mathbf{Z}[x, 1/x]$ | |
| as an abelian group? No explanation necessary. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Ideals] | |
| \label{exercise-ideals} | |
| Let $A = \mathbf{F}_2[x, y]/(x^2, xy, y^2)$ and denote | |
| $\overline{x}$ and $\overline{y}$ the images of $x$ and $y$ in $A$. | |
| List the ideals of $A$. No explanation necessary. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Tor and Ext] | |
| \label{exercise-compute-tor-ext} | |
| Let $(A, \mathfrak m, \kappa)$ be a Noetherian local ring. | |
| Set $\varphi(n) = \dim_\kappa \mathfrak m^n/\mathfrak m^{n + 1}$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Show that $\text{Tor}_1^A(A/\mathfrak m^n, \kappa)$ | |
| has dimension $\varphi(n)$ as a $\kappa$-vector space. | |
| \item Show that $\text{Ext}^1_A(A/\mathfrak m^n, \kappa)$ | |
| has dimension $\varphi(n)$ as a $\kappa$-vector space. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Two vectors] | |
| \label{exercise-two-vectors} | |
| Let $A = \mathbf{Z}[a_1, a_2, a_3, b_1, b_2, b3]$. Set | |
| $a = (a_1, a_2, a_3)$ and $b = (b_1, b_2, b_3)$ in $A^{\oplus 3}$. | |
| Consider the set | |
| $$ | |
| Z = \{\mathfrak p \in \Spec(A) \mid a, b | |
| \text{ map to linearly dependent vectors of } | |
| \kappa(\mathfrak p)^{\oplus 3}\} | |
| $$ | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Prove the $Z$ is a closed subset of $\Spec(A)$. | |
| \item What is the dimension $\dim(Z)$ of $Z$? | |
| \item What would happen to $\dim(Z)$ if we replaced $\mathbf{Z}$ by a field? | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Injectives] | |
| \label{exercise-injective-artinian-local} | |
| Let $(A, \mathfrak m, \kappa)$ be an Artinian local ring. | |
| Assume $A$ is injective as an $A$-module. Show that | |
| $\Hom_A(\kappa, A)$ has dimension $1$ has a | |
| $\kappa$-vector space. | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \section{Algebraic Geometry, Final Exam, Spring 2022} | |
| \label{section-final-exam-spring-2022} | |
| \noindent | |
| These were the questions in the final exam of a course on Algebraic Geometry, | |
| in the Spring of 2022 at Columbia University. | |
| \begin{exercise}[Definitions] | |
| \label{exercise-definitions-spring-2022} | |
| Provide brief definitions of the italicized concepts. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item a {\it scheme}, | |
| \item a {\it quasi-coherent module} on a scheme $X$, | |
| \item a {\it flat} morphism of schemes $X \to Y$, | |
| \item a {\it finite} morphism of schemes $X \to Y$, | |
| \item a {\it group scheme} $G$ over a base scheme $S$, | |
| \item a {\it family of varieties} over a base scheme $S$, | |
| \item the {\it degree} of a closed point $x$ on a variety $X$ | |
| over the field $k$, | |
| \item the usual {\it logarithmic height} of a point | |
| $p = (a_0 : \ldots : a_n)$ in $\mathbf{P}^n(\mathbf{Q})$, and | |
| \item a {\it $C_i$ field}. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Theorems] | |
| \label{exercise-results-spring-2022} | |
| Precisely but briefly state a nontrivial fact discussed in the lectures | |
| related to each item (if there is more than one then just pick | |
| one of them). | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item morphisms from a scheme $X$ to the affine scheme $\Spec(A)$, | |
| \item cohomology of a quasi-coherent module $\mathcal{F}$ on | |
| an affine scheme $X$, | |
| \item the Picard group of $\mathbf{P}^1_k$ where $k$ is a field, | |
| \item the dimensions of fibres of a flat proper morphism | |
| $X \to S$ for $S$ Noetherian, | |
| \item $\mathbf{G}_m$-equivariant modules on a scheme $S$, and | |
| \item Bezout's theorem on intersections (restrict to | |
| a special case if you like). | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Cubic hypersurfaces] | |
| \label{exercise-cubics} | |
| Let $F \in \mathbf{C}[T_0, \ldots, T_n]$ be homogeneous of degree $3$. | |
| Given $3$ vectors $x, y, z \in \mathbf{C}^{n + 1}$ consider the condition | |
| $$ | |
| (*)\quad | |
| F(\lambda x + \mu y + \nu z) = 0 \text{ in } \mathbf{C}[\lambda, \mu, \nu] | |
| $$ | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item What is the dimension of the space of all choices of $x, y, z$? | |
| \item How many equations on the coordinates of $x$, $y$, and $z$ | |
| is condition (*)? | |
| \item What is the expected dimension of the space of all triples | |
| $x, y, z$ such that (*) is true? | |
| \item What is the dimension of the space of all triples such that | |
| $x, y, z$ are linearly dependent? | |
| \item Conclude that on a hypersurface of degree $3$ in $\mathbf{P}^n$ | |
| we expect to find a linear subspace of dimension $2$ provided | |
| $n \geq a$ where it is up to you to find $a$. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Heights] | |
| \label{exercise-heights} | |
| Let $K$ be a field. Let $h_n : \mathbf{P}^n(K) \to \mathbf{R}$, $n \geq 0$ | |
| be a collection of functions satisfying the $2$ axioms we discussed | |
| in the lectures. Let $X$ be a projective variety | |
| over $K$. Let $\mathcal{L}$ be an invertible $\mathcal{O}_X$-module | |
| and recall that we have constructed in the lectures an associated | |
| height function $h_\mathcal{L} : X(K) \to \mathbf{R}$. | |
| Let $\alpha : X \to X$ be an automorphism of $X$ over $K$. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item Prove that $P \mapsto h_\mathcal{L}(\alpha(P))$ | |
| differs from the function $h_{\alpha^*\mathcal{L}}$ | |
| by a bounded amount. (Hint: recall that if there is a morphism | |
| $\varphi : X \to \mathbf{P}^n$ with | |
| $\mathcal{L} = \varphi^*\mathcal{O}_{\mathbf{P}^n}(1)$, then by construction | |
| $h_\mathcal{L}(P) = h_n(\varphi(P))$ and play around with that. | |
| In general write $\mathcal{L}$ as a difference of two of these.) | |
| \item Assume that $h_\mathcal{L}(P) - h_\mathcal{L}(\alpha(P))$ | |
| is unbounded on $X(K)$. Show that | |
| $h_\mathcal{N}$ with | |
| $\mathcal{N} = \mathcal{L} \otimes \alpha^*\mathcal{L}^{\otimes -1}$ | |
| is unbounded on $X(K)$. | |
| \item Assume $X$ is an elliptic curve and that | |
| $\mathcal{L}$ is a symmetric ample invertible module on $X$ | |
| such that $h_\mathcal{L}$ is unbounded on $X(K)$. Show | |
| that there exists an invertible module $\mathcal{N}$ of degree $0$ | |
| such that $h_\mathcal{N}$ is unbounded. | |
| (Hints: Recall that $X$ is an abelian variety of dimension $1$. | |
| Thus $h_\mathcal{L}$ is quadratic up to a constant by results | |
| in the lectures. Choose a suitable point $P_0 \in X(K)$. | |
| Let $\alpha : X \to X$ be translation by $P_0$. Consider | |
| $P \mapsto h_\mathcal{L}(P) - h_\mathcal{L}(P + P_0)$. | |
| Apply the results you proved above.) | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Monomorphisms] | |
| \label{exercise-monomorphisms} | |
| Let $f : X \to Y$ be a monomorphism in the category of schemes: | |
| for any pair of morphisms $a, b : T \to X$ of schemes if | |
| $f \circ a = f \circ b$, then $a = b$. Show that $f$ is injective | |
| on points. Does you argument say anything else? | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \begin{exercise}[Fixed points] | |
| \label{exercise-fix-points} | |
| Let $k$ be an algebraically closed field. | |
| \begin{enumerate} | |
| \item If $G = \mathbf{G}_{m, k}$ show that if $G$ acts on a | |
| projective variety $X$ over $k$, then the action has a fixed point, i.e., | |
| prove there exists a point $x \in X(k)$ such that $a(g, x) = x$ for | |
| all $g \in G(k)$. | |
| \item Same with $G = (\mathbf{G}_{m, k})^n$ equal to the product of | |
| $n \geq 1$ copies of the multiplicative group. | |
| \item Give an example of an action of a connected group scheme $G$ | |
| on a smooth projective variety $X$ which does not have a fixed point. | |
| \end{enumerate} | |
| \end{exercise} | |
| \input{chapters} | |
| \bibliography{my} | |
| \bibliographystyle{amsalpha} | |
| \end{document} | |