TITLE: Can one represent a generalized hypergeometric function 1F2 as a product of two confluent hypergeometric functions?
QUESTION [6 upvotes]: I am trying to somewhat simplify a series, whose coefficients feature generalised hypergeometric functions ${}_1F_2(1;a,a+1;z)$. I was unable to find useful functional relations for this specific combination of parameters (I tried the new NIST Handbook, third volume of A.P. Prudnikov, Brychkov & Marychev's "Integrals and Series" and all online sources I could get my hands on).
Interestingly, L.J. Slater mentions on p.47 of her book "Generalized Hypergeometric Functions" that
${}_1F_2(a;b,c;z)$ is the product of two confluent hypergeometric functions
and gives a reference to the paper of F.J.W. Whipple (1927) in J. Lond. Math. Soc., 2, p. 85, which is focussed on relationships between functions ${}_3F_2$ and ${}_4F_3$. I must be missing something here, but I cannot figure out how Whipple's paper supports the Slater's statement. Therefore, my question is

Is it really possible to represent generalized hypergeometric functions ${}_1F_2(a;b,c;z)$ with arbitrary (within reason) parameters $a$, $b$ and $c$ as a product of two confluent hypergeometric functions?
If yes, could you please point me in a direction of the relevant book/paper/formula/derivation?

REPLY [3 votes]: It seems the relevant paper is in fact C. T. Preece (1923) in Proceedings of The London Mathematical Society, Volume s2-22, Issue 1, p. 370. Identities such as
$
\left\{ {}_1\mathcal{F}_1\left(a;2a;x\right)\right\}^2 = e^x {}_1\mathcal{F}_2(a;2a,a+1/2;x^2/4)
$
are provided. There don't seem to be any with more than one free parameter, however.