TITLE: Why are the irreducible components of a subspace of Noetherian space just the intersection with the irreducible components?
QUESTION [8 upvotes]: Suppose you have a Noetherian topological space $X$, and its finitely many irreducible components are $X_1,\dots,X_n$. If $U\subseteq X$ is open, why are the irreducible components of $U$ precisely the intersections $U\cap X_i$ which aren't empty?
The thing that's tripping me up is I don't see how to go from components in $U$ to those in $X$. For suppose $U\cap X_i=(U\cap Z_1)\cup(U\cap Z_2)$, where $Z_1,Z_2$ are closed in $X$. To show $U\cap X_i$ is irreducible, it has to be either $U\cap Z_1$ or $U\cap Z_2$. If not, there exist points $x,y\in U$ where $x\in X_i\setminus Z_1$ and $y\in X_i\setminus Z_2$. My hunch says there should be a way to go up and find a proper decomposition of $X_i$ in $X$ as a union of closed sets to get a contradiction.
I run into the same issue trying to show $U\cap X_i$ is maximal among irreducible sets in $U$. 
What's the right way to see this property?

REPLY [5 votes]: Let $X$ be any topological space.
The irreducible components of $X$ meeting $U$ correspond to the irreducible components of any open subset $U$ of $X$, via intersecting with $U$.
In this paragraph, we will give a bijection between irreducible closed subsets of $X$ meeting $U$ and the irreducible closed subsets of $U$.

If $Z$ is an irreducible closed subset of $X$ meeting $U$, then
$Z\cap U$ is irreducible. This is obvious because a nonempty space
is irreducible if and only if any two nonempty open subspaces have
nonempty intersection, by definition.
If $T = Z\cap U$ is irreducible, where $Z\subset X$ closed, then the
closure $\overline{T}$ of $T$ in $X$ is irreducible. This is obvious
because the closure of an irreducible set is irreducible as well, by
Exercise 3.6.B(b).
If $Z$ is an irreducible closed subset of $X$ meeting $U$, then the
closure of $Z\cap U$ in $X$ is just $Z$. This is true because in an
irreducible topological space, any nonempty open subspace is dense.
If $T = Z\cap U$ irreducible, where $Z\subset X$ closed, then
    $\overline{T}\cap U = T$, where $\overline{T}$ is the closure of $T$
    in $X$. On one hand, $\overline{T} = \overline{Z\cap U}\subset Z$
    and thus $\overline{T}\cap U\subset Z\cap U = T$. On the other hand,
    $T\subset\overline{T}$ and $T\subset U$ and thus
    $T\subset\overline{T}\cap U$.

In this paragraph, we will show that the bijection above maps components to components in both directions.

If $Z$ is an irreducible component of $X$ meeting $U$, then $Z\cap U$
is an irreducible component of $U$. Let $S$ be an irreducible closed
subset of $U$ containing $Z\cap U$. Then, $\overline{S}$ is an
irreducible closed subset of $X$ containing $\overline{Z\cap U} = Z$.
Since $Z$ is an irreducible component, $\overline{S} = Z$. Thus, $S =
   \overline{S}\cap U = Z\cap U$.
If $T$ is an irreducible component of $U$, then $\overline{T}$ is an
irreducible component of $X$. Let $Y$ be an irreducible closed subset
of $X$ containing $\overline{T}$. Then, $Y\cap
   U\supset\overline{T}\cap U = T$. Since $T$ is an irreducible
component of $U$, $Y\cap U = T$. Thus, $Y = \overline{Y\cap U} =
   \overline{T}$.