TITLE: Dimension of spaces of bi/linear maps
QUESTION [6 upvotes]: For $V$  a finite dimensional vector space over a field $\mathbb{K}$, I have encountered the claim that
$$
\dim(\mathrm{Hom}(V,V)) = \dim(\mathrm{Hom}(V \times V, \mathbb{K}))
$$
where $\mathrm{Hom}(V,V)$ denote the vector spaces, respectively, of all linear maps from $V$ to $V$ and all bilinear maps from $V\times V$ to the ground field $\mathbb{K}$. I'm sure I'm overlooking something elementary, but I don't see this.
There is a theorem that, in general, for any finite-dimensional vector spaces $V$ and $W$ that $$
\dim(\mathrm{Hom}(V,W)) = \dim(V)\dim(W)
$$
But, $\dim(V \times W) = \dim(V) + \dim(W)$ and therefore
$$
\dim(\mathrm{Hom}(V \times V, \mathbb{K})) = (\dim(V) + \dim(V))\cdot \dim(K) = 2\dim(V)\cdot 1
$$
which is obviously not equal to $\dim(\mathrm{Hom}(V,V)) = \dim(V)\cdot\dim(V)$
Where is my mistake?

REPLY [3 votes]: I would not write $\operatorname{Hom}(V \times V, \mathbb K)$ for the space of bilinear maps, since there is nothing to distinguish this from your old notation for the space of linear maps. I've seen $L^2(V, V; \mathbb K)$ used, but $\operatorname{Bilin}(V, V; \mathbb K)$ has the advantage of being obvious. In any case, it never hurts to specify your notation.
Now to calculate the dimension. Let $\{e_1, \ldots, e_n\}$ be a basis for $V$, and let $\{f_i\}$ be the corresponding dual basis. Then I claim that the set of $n^2$ bilinear maps
\[
F_{ij}(x, y) = f_i(x)f_j(y) \qquad i, j = 1, \ldots, n
\]
is a basis for $L^2(V, V; \mathbb K)$. To remember this fact, it might help to recall how bilinear forms correspond to matrices after one has chosen a basis.