TITLE: Meaning of $\mathbb{R}[x]$
QUESTION [6 upvotes]: I ran into this expression in a paper I was reading, and I'm confused about part of the meaning.  Here $u$ and $v$ are two polynomials.
$$u, v \in \mathbb{R}[x]$$
I'm not really familiar with usage of $[x]$ here, but if it means "nearest integer", then isn't this expression equivalent to simply:
$$u, v \in \mathbb{Z}$$

REPLY [5 votes]: Generally, if $\rm\,R \subset S\,$ are rings and $\rm\,s\in S\,$ then $\rm\,R[s]\,$ denotes the ring-adjunction of $\rm\,s\,$ to $\rm\,R,\,$ i.e. the smallest subring of $\rm\,S\,$ containing both $\rm\,R\,$ and $\rm\,s\,.\,$ Equivalently $\,\rm R[s]$ is the image of $\rm\,R[x]\,$ under the evaluation map $\rm\,x\mapsto s,\,$ i.e.  elements of $\rm\,S\,$ writable as a polynomial in $\rm\,s\,$ with coefficents in $\rm\,R.\,$ 
Similarly, if $\rm\,F \subset E\,$ are fields and $\rm\,\alpha\in E\,$ then $\rm\,F(e)\,$ denotes the field-adjunction of $\rm\,\alpha\,$ to $\rm\,F,\,$ i.e. the smallest subfield of $\rm\,E\,$ containing both $\rm\,F\,$ and $\rm\,\alpha.$
The notation for the polynomial ring $\rm\,R[x]\,$ is  the special case where $\rm\,x\,$ is transcendental over $\rm\,R\ $ (an "indeterminate" in old-fashioned language),$\ $ i.e. $\rm\, x\,$ isn't a root of any polynomial with coefficients in $\rm\,R\,$. One may view $\rm\,R[x]\,$ as the most general ring obtained by adjoining to $\rm\,R\,$  of a universal (or generic) element $\rm\,x,\,$ in the sense that any other adjunction $\rm\,R[s]\,$ is a ring-image of $\rm\,R[x]\,$ under the evaluation homomomorphism $\rm\, x\to s\,.\ $ 
For example, if $\rm\,R \subset S\,$  are fields then $\rm\,R[s]\cong R[x]/(f(x))\,$ where $\rm\,f(x)= \,$ minimal polynomial of $\rm\,s\,$ over $\rm\,R.\,$ Essentially this serves to faithfully ring-theoretically model $\rm\,s\,$ as a "generic" root $\rm\,x\,$ of the minimal polynomial $\rm\,f(x)\,$ for $\rm\,s\,.\,$ 
Polynomial rings may be characterized by the existence and uniqueness of such evaluation maps ("universal mapping property"), e.g. see any textbook on Universal Algebra, e.g. Bergman.