TITLE: Subgroups of $\Bbb{R}^n$ that are closed and discrete
QUESTION [6 upvotes]: I am trying to prove that every closed discrete subgroup of $\Bbb{R}^n$ under addition is a free abelian group of finite rank. I have tried to do this by induction on the dimension $n$. 


Base case: We claim that a subgroup $H \subset \Bbb{R}$ has a least positive element $\alpha$. The completeness axiom tells us that there is a least positive real number $\alpha$ among all positive reals in $H$, and being closed implies that $\alpha \in H$. 


Now assume the inductive hypothesis and consider a closed, discrete subgroup $H$ of $\Bbb{R}^n$. Choose some element $x \in H$ of least positive distance to the origin. This can be done because otherwise we get a contradiction like the above. Now let $L$ be the subspace spanned by $x$ and write $\Bbb{R}^n = L \oplus W$ for some complement $W$. Consider the projection (as a linear map) $p : \Bbb{R}^n \to W$.  Now this is also a group homomorphism and so we have
$$\textrm{Im} (H) \subset W$$
being a subgroup and so by the induction hypothesis is isomorphic to $\Bbb{Z}^l$ for some $1 \leq l \leq n-1$. However from here I am having some trouble concluding that $H$ itself must be isomorphic to $\Bbb{Z}^l \oplus \Bbb{Z}x$. If I know the existence of a map $l : \textrm{Im}(H) \to H$ such that 
$$p \circ l = \textrm{id}_{\textrm{Im}(H)}$$
then by the splitting lemma I can conclude my problem. However, I don't have such a map so how do I conclude the problem? Please do not post complete solutions.
Thanks.
Edit: Perhaps I should add some context. I am trying to conclude that the kernel of the exponential map $\exp : \mathfrak{g} \to G$ where $G$ is a connected abelian matrix Lie group is a free abelian group of finite rank. We know that the assumptions on our matrix Lie group mean that $\exp$ is a group homomorphism, so that $\ker \exp$ is a subgroup of the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$.
Edit: The problem is reduced to showing that the image of $H$ under the projection is indeed discrete, because otherwise we cannot apply the inductive hypothesis.

REPLY [5 votes]: I fully endorse Alex Becker's answer. I just want to address the question of discreteness of $p(H)$ in the original post.
Let $W$ be the orthogonal complement to $L$, so $p$ is the orthogonal projection onto $W$. 
Lemma. For all elements $y\in \left(H\setminus\mathbb{Z}x\right)$ we have $||p(y)||\ge ||x||/2.$
Proof. Let $y\in \left(H\setminus\mathbb{Z}x\right)$  be arbitrary. Let us write
$$
y=rx+w,
$$
where $r\in\mathbb{R}$ and $w\in W$. Because $x$ generates $L\cap H$, we must have $y\notin L$, so $w\neq0$. There exists an integer $m$ such that $|m-r|\le1/2$. Consider the vector
$y'=y-mx=(r-m)x+w\in H$. Because $y\notin L$, $y'\neq0$. Therefore $||y'||\ge ||x||$
as $x$ was selected to be (one of) the shortest non-zero vectors in $H$. By construction
$||(r-m)x||\le ||x||/2$. By triangle inequality
$$
||p(y)||=||w||=||y'-(r-m)x||\ge ||y'||-||(r-m)x||\ge ||x||-\frac{||x||}2=\frac{||x||}2.
$$
Q.E.D.
The discreteness of the image follows immediately from the Lemma. If $p(y)$ and $p(y')$ are two distinct points in the group $p(H)$, then $y-y'\notin\mathbb{Z}x$, and therefore
$$
d(p(y),p(y'))=||p(y)-p(y')||=||p(y-y')||\ge\frac{||x||}2.
$$