TITLE: A Question in May's Concise Algebraic Topology
QUESTION [8 upvotes]: I am trying to follow May's proof of the above proposition, but I a do not quite understand one of his conclusions. Namely, he makes states the following during his proof:

By HEP for $j$, there is a homotopy inverse $g'$ for $f$ such that $g'\circ j=i\circ e$.

How does May conclude this based on the fact $j$ is a cofibration? He is hiding a few steps and I just cannot connect the dots, especially since the definition of a cofibration involves always being able to complete a certain type of diagram. I have been trying for a while to find the right diagram, but to no avail. If possible, could someone help illuminate what is happening here?
Here is the whole proof for context:

REPLY [4 votes]: Actually one can say more: if $d'$ is a homotopy inverse of $d$ and (omitting the $\circ$'s) $h:d'  d\simeq 1, k: d  d' \simeq 1$, then there is a homotopy inverse $f'$ of $f$ with  homotopies
$h':f' f \simeq 1, k': f f' \simeq 1$ such that $f'$ extends $d'$, $h'$ extends $h$, while $k'$ extends the composite of the homotopies 
$$ d' d  = d' d 1_A \simeq d'd d' d \simeq d'1_Bd \simeq 1_A$$
determined by $h,k$. 
Comments: 1) This result was arrived at by generalising the classic proof that a homotopy equivalence of spaces induces an isomorphism of homotopy groups.  (The point is that the homotopy equivalence is not given as a homotopy equivalence of spaces with  base points.) A crucial technique in the proof is the operation of the fundamental groupoid on the higher homotopy groups. When the base point in a  sphere is replaced by a cofibration  $i: A \to X$ one  replaces a fundamental groupoid of $Y$ by the track groupoid $\pi_1 Y^A $ of homotopy classes of homotopies $A \to X$, and let this act on the family of homotopy classes $[(X,i),(Y,u)]$ for all $u:A \to Y$.  
2) The advantage of stating  the precise control of the homotopies is that it makes it easy to glue homotopy equivalences along the spaces $A,B$. That was how I found the Gluing Lemma for homotopy equivalences for the 1968 edition of Topology and Groupoids, and which is in Section 7.4 of T&G also it is easy to generalise from gluing two spaces to gluing $n$ spaces (Exercise 1 of Section 7.4). 
3) The curious composite of homotopies is related to the elementary lemma in category theory that a right inverse of an isomorphism is itself an isomorphism. This can be applied to homotopy equivalences of spaces instead of isomorphisms, but the relevance comes when you try to identify the homotopies. I expect  that the above statement on $k'$ can be recovered from Peter May's proof.
4) I don't think it is possible to get in general the homotopy $k'$ to extend $k$ but I do not have a counterexample. (One has been given in the dual fibration case.)