TITLE: Semisimple objects in abelian categories
QUESTION [5 upvotes]: Let $\mathcal A$ be any Grothendieck abelian category and $0 \neq M \in \cal A$ an object.
It is true that $M$ admits a simple subquotient?
It is certainly true for $\mathcal A=R-Mod$ since $M$ contains a cyclic module and any (left)ideal is contained in a maximal.
Motivation: In the category of modules over a ring $R$ the following are equivalent for an object $M$.
1) $M$ is a (maybe infinite) direct sum of simple modules.
2) Every short exact equence 
$$0 \rightarrow M'\rightarrow M\rightarrow M''\rightarrow 0$$ 
splits.
I want to generalize this statement to any abelian category and the above seems crucial for $2) \Rightarrow 1)$.
Edit: Hanno Becker informed me, that there are abelian categories without any irreducible objects, see Jeremy Rickards answer to this question. 
I changed my question accordingly.

REPLY [3 votes]: Even with the extra condition that $\mathcal{A}$ is a Grothendieck category, it may still have no simple objects. I think the following is the easiest example I know.
Let $R$ be a (necessarily non-noetherian) commutative local ring with non-zero maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$ satisfying $\mathfrak{m}^2=\mathfrak{m}$. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be the category of $R$-modules and let $\mathcal{D}$ be the full subcategory of modules annihilated by $\mathfrak{m}$; i.e., of semisimple modules.
Then $\mathcal{D}$ is a full abelian subcategory of $\mathcal{C}$ closed under coproducts. An extension in $\mathcal{C}$ of two objects of $\mathcal{D}$ is a module for $R/\mathfrak{m}^2=R/\mathfrak{m}$, and so $\mathcal{D}$ is closed under extensions. So $\mathcal{D}$ is a localizing subcategory of $\mathcal{C}$, which implies that the quotient category $\mathcal{A}=\mathcal{C}/\mathcal{D}$ is a Grothendieck category.
Suppose $M$ is an $R$-module. $M$ has a maximal semisimple quotient $M'=M/M\mathfrak{m}$, and in turn $M\mathfrak{m}$ has a maximal semisimple submodule $M''=\operatorname{soc}(M\mathfrak{m})$. 
Let $N=M\mathfrak{m}/M''$. Then $M\cong M\mathfrak{m}\cong N$ in $\mathcal{A}$. Since we know that semisimple modules are closed under extensions, $N$ can have no non-zero semisimple quotients or submodules without contradicting the maximality of the quotient $M/M\mathfrak{m}$ or the submodule $\operatorname{soc}(M\mathfrak{m})$.
Suppose $N'$ is a proper non-zero $R$-submodule of $N$. Since neither $N'$ nor $N/N'$ can be in $\mathcal{D}$, $N$ is not simple in $\mathcal{A}$.
So $\mathcal{A}$ is a Grothendieck category with no simple objects.