TITLE: Is this definite integral positive?
QUESTION [6 upvotes]: I have a doubt and I am not able to prove (or disprove):

Let $f(x)$ be an odd function with $f(x)>0\,\,\,\forall x\in (0,+\infty)$.
Let $g(x)$ be a non-negative function: $g(x)\geq 0\;\forall x\in \mathbb{R}.$
Also suppose $\displaystyle \int_{-\infty}^0g(x)\,dx<\int_{0}^{\infty}g(x)\,dx.$

I wonder if one can assure that:
$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)\,g(x)\,dx>0.$$
EDIT 1: Has been  proved (by Adrian Keister) that my thesis is false.
Now I wonder again if is possible add another hypothesis about $g(x)$ to assure my thesis.
EDIT 2:The problem arrives from here:

blue line is $f(x)= \left(e^{-\frac{\cosh ^2(u-1)}{2 }}-e^{-\frac{\cosh ^2(1+u)}{2 }}\right)$ and orange line is $g(x)=e^{-\frac{u^2}{2 }}\cos ^2\left(\frac{\pi  (u-1)}{4 }\right)$ and the function $f(x)g(x)$ graphic

As we can see in the graph, the integral $\int_{\mathbb{R}}f(x)g(x)\,dx$ seems to be positive.
We can translate the factor $e^{-u^2/2}$ from $g(x)$ to $f(x)$ (in this case the third hypothesis is not fulfilled):

REPLY [2 votes]: If for almost all positive $x$ you have $g(x)\geq g(-x)$ and that there is a non-null set of $x$ such that $g(x)\neq g(-x)$, then this integral will always be positive.
No other hypothesis on $g$ will suffice (for all $f$). If $g(x)=g(-x)$ almost everywhere, then the integral is clearly zero. Otherwise, suppose $A\subseteq [0,\infty)$ is a set of positive measure such that for $x\in A$ we have $g(x)< g(-x)$. We may assume without loss of generality that for all $x\in A$ we have $g(-x)>g(x)+1/n$ for some positive integer $n$.
Now, take for $f$ an odd function such that $f(x)=2n/\lvert A\rvert$ for $x\in A$ and $f(x)<\left(\int_{-\infty}^\infty \lvert g(t)\rvert\,\mathrm{d}t\right)^{-1}$ for positive $x\notin A$.
Then $\int_{A\cup -A} f(t)g(t)\,\mathrm{d}t<-2$ and $\left\lvert \int_{(A\cup -A)^c} f(t)g(t)\,\mathrm{d}t\right\rvert\leq 1$.