TITLE: What are the differences between classical Yang-Baxter Equation and quantum Yang-Baxter Equation?
QUESTION [6 upvotes]: what are the differences between classical Yang-Baxter Equation and quantum Yang-Baxter Equation? Thank you very much.

REPLY [6 votes]: This is basically a comment to the answer of Mariano Suárez-Alvar,  but it's too long for a comment. I want to say what is the connection of classical and quantum YBE and to correct a little omition.
A solution of Yang-Baxter equation is called an R-matrix.
In the quantum YBE, $R$ is an element of $H\otimes H$, where $H=U_h\mathfrak{g}$ is a quantum group, i.e. a deformation of the enveloping algebra $U\mathfrak{g}$. ($R$ is supposed to make the category of $H$-modules to a braided monoidal category. In particular it should give a representation of the braid group $B_n$ on the $n$-fold tensor power of any module $V$; quantum YBE is just the relevant relation in $B_3$.)
Classical YBE is a 1st order approximation of the quantum YBE. It is an equation for an element $r\in\mathfrak{g}\otimes\mathfrak{g}$, it says $[r_{12}, r_{13}] + [r_{12}, r_{23}] + [r_{13}, r_{23}] = 0$. If $r$ is skew-symmetric then it's the equation written by Mariano. If not (and in the interesting cases it is not skew-symmetric) it can be written as $[r_{skew},r_{skew}]=\phi$ where $r_{skew}$ is the skew-symmetric part of $r$ and $\phi\in\wedge^3\mathfrak{g}$ is obtained from the symmetric part and from the structure constants of $\mathfrak{g}$.
By a theorem of Etingof and Kazhdan (building upon Drinfeld's results), any classical R-matrix can be extended to a quantum one.