TITLE: Does $\det(A+xB)$ have a nice form for $3 \times 3$ matrices?
QUESTION [7 upvotes]: I know that if $A,B \in M_2(\mathbb{C})$, then 
$$\det(A+xB)=x^2 \det B +x(\operatorname{Tr}A\cdot \operatorname{Tr}B-\operatorname{Tr}(AB))+\det A.$$
What if $A,B \in M_3(\mathbb{C})$? Can we find a similar relation for $\det(A+xB)$?

REPLY [8 votes]: First notice that setting $x = 0$ gives that the constant term in $x$ is $\det A$, and appealing to symmetry gives that the leading term is $(\det B) x^3$, so it remains to find the two intermediate terms.
Temporarily assume $A$ is invertible---we'll remove this restriction later. Factoring gives $A + x B = A (I + x A^{-1} B),$ and taking the determinant gives
\begin{align}
\det(A + x B)
&= \det A \det (I + x A^{-1} B) \\
&= \det A [1 + x \operatorname{tr}(A^{-1} B) + x^2 \sigma_2(A^{-1} B) + x^3 \det (A^{-1} B)] .
\end{align}
Here we've just exploited the definition of eigenvalues to write $\det (I + C)$ in terms of the usual symmetric polynomials $\operatorname{tr}, \sigma_2, \det$ of the eigenvalues of $\lambda_i$. Explicitly, $$\sigma_2(C) = \lambda_2 \lambda_3 + \lambda_3 \lambda_1 + \lambda_1 \lambda_2 = (c_{22} c_{33} - c_{23} c_{32}) + (c_{33} c_{11} - c_{31} c_{13}) + (c_{11} c_{22} - c_{12} c_{21}) .$$
So, the coefficient of $x$ in $\det (A + x B)$ is $$\det A \operatorname{tr}(A^{-1} B) .$$ We can write this without using the inversion operator, after which we can appeal to continuity to show that our resulting formula doesn't require the condition that $A$ is invertible.
Using the same trick as before lets us expand the characteristic polynomial of $A$ in terms of symmetric polynomials of the eigenvalues of $A$:
$$\phantom{(\ast)} \qquad p_A(t) = \det(t I - A) = t^3 - (\operatorname{tr} A) t^2 + \sigma_2(A) t - \det A . \qquad (\ast)$$
In particular, the Cayley-Hamilton Theorem gives
$$0 = p_A(A) = A^3 - (\operatorname{tr A}) A^2 + \sigma_2(A) A - (\det A) I ,$$
and (using again that $A$ is invertible) rearranging gives
$$A^{-1} = (\det A)^{-1} [A^2 - (\operatorname{tr} A) A + \sigma_2(A) I].$$ Substituting now gives that the coefficient of $x$ in $\det(A + x B)$ is
\begin{align}
\det A \operatorname{tr}(A^{-1} B)
&= \det A \operatorname{tr}[(\det A)^{-1} [A^2 - (\operatorname{tr} A) A + \sigma_2(A) I] B] \\
&= \boxed{\operatorname{tr}(A^2 B) - \operatorname{tr}(AB) \operatorname{tr} A + \sigma_2(A) \operatorname{tr} B} .
\end{align}
The coefficient of $x$ and the boxed expression are continuous functions that agree where $A$ is invertible, and since this is dense in the set of all $3 \times 3$ matrices, continuity implies that they agree everywhere.
We can calculate the coefficient of $x^2$ in $\det(A + x B)$ similarly, but, as we did for the leading and constant terms in $x$ we can just appeal to symmetry, giving $$\boxed{\operatorname{tr}(B^2 A) - \operatorname{tr}(BA) \operatorname{tr} B + \sigma_2(B) \operatorname{tr} A} .$$ Putting this all together and rearranging a little for aesthetic reasons gives
$$\color{#df0000}{\boxed{\det (A + x B) = x^3 \det B + [\operatorname{tr}(A B^2) - \operatorname{tr} B \operatorname{tr}(AB) + (\operatorname{tr} A) \sigma_2(B)] x^2 \\ \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad + [\operatorname{tr}(A^2 B) - \operatorname{tr} A \operatorname{tr}(AB) + \sigma_2(A) \operatorname{tr} B] x + \det A}} .$$
Finally, we have
$$\sigma_2(C) = \lambda_2 \lambda_3 + \lambda_3 \lambda_1 + \lambda_1 \lambda_2 = \frac{1}{2}[(\operatorname{tr} C)^2 - \operatorname{tr} (C^2)],$$ so substituting lets us produce an expression that relies only on the more familiar trace and determinant operators:
$$\color{#df0000}{\boxed{\det (A + x B) = x^3 \det B + \left[\operatorname{tr}(A B^2) - \operatorname{tr} B \operatorname{tr}(AB) + \frac{1}{2} (\operatorname{tr} A) [(\operatorname{tr} B)^2 - \operatorname{tr} (B^2)]\right] x^2 \\ \qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad\qquad + \left[\operatorname{tr}(A^2 B) - \operatorname{tr} A \operatorname{tr}(AB) + \frac{1}{2}[(\operatorname{tr} A)^2 - \operatorname{tr} (A^2)] \operatorname{tr} B\right] x + \det A}} .$$
The general procedure here works just as well for finding the coefficients of $\det(A + x B)$ for matrices of any size.