TITLE: question regarding the existence of measurable subset with positive measure
QUESTION [5 upvotes]: It is well-known that any measurable set with a positive measure has a non-measurable subset. But how about the related question: whether there always exists a measurable subset with positive measure in a non-measurable set.
Intuitively I would say yes. But not sure how to provide a proof. Please help prove or refute it.
Thanks.

REPLY [4 votes]: A key definition here is "inner measure".  The Lebesgue inner measure of a set $A$ is the supremum of the measures of the Lebesgue measurable subsets of $A$ (equivalently, of the closed subsets of $A$).  You are asking whether every nonmeasurable set has positive inner measure, and as user8268 has shown, the answer is no.  
A set of real numbers $A$ of finite outer measure is measurable if and only if its Lebesgue inner measure $m_*(A)$ is equal to its Lebesgue outer measure $m^*(A)$.  If $m^*(A)=m_*(A)$, then there is a $G_\delta$ set $G$ and an $F_\sigma$ set $F$ such that $F\subseteq A\subseteq G$ and $m(F)=m_*(A)=m^*(A)=m(G)$.  Then $A\setminus F\subseteq G\setminus F$ is a null set, and therefore $A=F\cup(A\setminus F)$ is measurable.
Let $A$ be a nonmeasurable set with finite inner measure.  Let $F\subset A$ be an $F_\sigma$ such that $m(F)=m_*(A)$.  Then $A\setminus F$ is a nonmeasurable set with inner measure $0$.  Thus, every nonmeasurable set contains nonmeasurable subsets with no measurable subsets of positive measure.